Tuesday, April 02, 2019

Chicago Votes on a New Mayor. Either Way, an African-American Woman Will Win
Chicagoans headed to the polls Tuesday to elect their next mayor.

By Julie Bosman and Mitch Smith
New York Times
April 2, 2019

CHICAGO — Adrianne Burton, 38, believes that the next mayor of Chicago will have a sharper, more empathetic eye on the public schools. Carolyn Davenport, 62, is confident that the new mayor will be a superior manager, accustomed to running a career and a household without any fuss.

On her lunch break in the Loop, Denise Thompson, 54, had a different view. “We’re making history, sure,” she said. “But a black woman running the city will be just like anybody else.”

On Tuesday, Chicagoans were headed to the polls to vote for a successor to Mayor Rahm Emanuel. Residents were choosing between two African-American women, guaranteeing that Chicago will become the largest American city to elect a black woman as its mayor.

Competing in the runoff election are Lori Lightfoot, a lawyer and former federal prosecutor, and Toni Preckwinkle, the president of the Cook County Board and the chairwoman of the county’s Democratic Party. Both women beat out 12 other candidates in an election in February, a who’s who of well-known names that made up the most crowded ballot in municipal history.

As the voting began, the historic nature of the election was greeted in Chicago with both pride and nonchalance, a sense that electing an African-American woman as mayor would be significant, but not seismic.

Maybe it is because Chicago has already seen such milestones, sending the first African-American president, Barack Obama, to the White House; helping elect the first African-American woman to the United States Senate, Carol Moseley Braun of Illinois, in 1992; and making Harold Washington the city’s first black mayor in 1983.

“It is tremendous,” said Josie Brown Childs, a civic leader who worked for Mr. Washington in the 1980s. “But Chicago has been on the forefront of certain black politics, whether it was with Harold or Obama. We’ve been in the lead on those things.”

In interviews around the city during the run-up to the election, Chicagoans said they were carefully weighing the platforms and promises of Ms. Preckwinkle and Ms. Lightfoot, watching their performances in televised debates and considering what kind of leader the current moment in Chicago demands.

“For me, personally, I’m asking, ‘Who is going to be the break from politics as usual in Chicago?’” said Jordie Davies, a Ph.D. candidate at the University of Chicago whose dissertation focuses on political activism. “I’m excited about two black women. But I’m looking at records. I’m looking at who is going to offer the most holistic platform for addressing problems in Chicago.”

Deidre Baumann, 50, a lawyer who cast her vote Tuesday at a library in the Budlong Woods neighborhood on the North Side, said she would be happy with whichever candidate prevailed.

“Either way, this is a historic election,” she said.

She watched the debates and studied the candidates’ records carefully, she said, deciding in the end to vote for Ms. Lightfoot, who she believed would bring her experience as a federal prosecutor to push for criminal justice reform.

“We have to make this city safe for all the citizens and the police,” Ms. Baumann said. “On the other hand, we cannot continue to incarcerate black and brown people in disparate numbers.”

In her eyes, Ms. Preckwinkle represented an older political model. “I’m disturbed a bit by her ties to the machine,” she said. “She always touted herself as the progressive candidate. She’s had to move away from that as she navigated the political system in Chicago.”

The new mayor must contend with a host of complicated issues in the nation’s third largest city, including a deep pension crisis, persistent violent crime, reform of the police department and the question of how to spur investment and growth in long-neglected and segregated neighborhoods on Chicago’s West and South Sides. Under Mr. Emanuel, the downtown has boomed, flourishing with tech companies, high-rise hotels, a sparkling riverfront and luxury apartments. But many African-American residents have moved out of the city in recent years. Mr. Emanuel, who was elected to two terms, did not seek a third term in office.

Polls have suggested that Ms. Lightfoot has a commanding lead over Ms. Preckwinkle, who entered the race last September after Mr. Emanuel announced that he would not run again. Ms. Preckwinkle garnered endorsements from powerful labor groups — the Chicago Teachers Union and the Service Employees International Union — and from prominent black leaders including Jesse White, the secretary of state.

In the part of Chicago’s South Side that Ms. Preckwinkle once represented in the City Council, voters remembered her tenure fondly. Bob Kurth, 76, a longtime resident of the Kenwood neighborhood, said Ms. Preckwinkle came through years ago when he complained about a hole in the street near his condo building.

“She was approachable: If you had a problem that was part of the ward, you called her and you had a meeting with her,” Mr. Kurth said on Tuesday after voting for Ms. Preckwinkle. “You saw her on the street, she always had time to talk to you.”

Ms. Preckwinkle’s long stint in government was not a deterrent.

“With Toni, she didn’t start as a politician, and that means a lot to me,” said Mr. Kurth, a retired salesman. “She’s learned how to play the game, but I don’t consider her a part of it.”

Others saw Ms. Preckwinkle’s years in political office as a concern. The fact Ms. Lighftoot had not served in elective office helped her earn the vote of Michelle Saulnier, 29, a Ph.D. student.

“It’s a good thing, especially in Chicago where there’s known to be a lot of corruption,” Ms. Saulnier said after casting her ballot in the Logan Square neighborhood, where Ms. Lightfoot lives and her campaign signs abound. “I think that’s really important to try to break some of these cycles that we’re in.”

Ms. Lightfoot had a head start on the campaign trail, declaring her candidacy for mayor in May 2018, when it was widely believed that she would face off against Mr. Emanuel.

A relatively unknown figure who has never held elective office, Ms. Lightfoot has spent time introducing herself to voters as a candidate who would focus on overhauling the police department, curbing street violence and rebuilding neighborhoods beyond the affluent downtown and North Side. Ra Joy, an entrepreneur in Chicago who was a candidate for lieutenant governor in 2018, endorsed Ms. Lightfoot early in the race, he said on Saturday at a candidate forum at the Rainbow PUSH Coalition on the South Side.

A mayoral contest between two African-American women has scrambled the usual political calculus in Chicago, or what Mr. Joy called “tribal voting,” in which politicians could count on support from voters of their own race.

“It’s turned that notion on its head,” he said, adding that the successful candidate would have to build coalitions of Latinos, whites and African-Americans in a city where the population is almost evenly divided among the three groups.

Celestine A. Strain, 46, a hospital technician, brought her granddaughter Kalicia, 9, to the forum at Rainbow PUSH, hoping Kalicia would someday remember seeing two black women running for mayor of Chicago.

“It’s amazing for her to see,” Ms. Strain said, adding that she was hoping Ms. Preckwinkle, who has been a familiar face in county government for years, would emerge victorious on Tuesday. “I really believe that she has the right experience.”

The Rev. Jesse Jackson offered no endorsement in the race, saying that he hoped to be more of a peacemaker after what played out in recent weeks as a bitter campaign. On stage on Saturday, he urged both candidates to sign a statement agreeing to appear together the morning after the election. “I wanted to play a reconciling role,” Mr. Jackson said in an interview in his office at Rainbow PUSH. “The campaign ends. Let the healing begin.”

No comments:

Post a Comment