Wednesday, October 25, 2017

Kenya Supreme Court Quorum Hitch Hits Repeat Election Case
WEDNESDAY OCTOBER 25 2017
   
David Maraga
Chief Justice David Maraga. Only the CJ and Justice Isaac Lenaola out of seven judges were present when the court convened on October 25, 2017.PHOTO | JEFF ANGOTE | NATION MEDIA GROUP 

In Summary
Justice Maraga started off by regretting that the hearing will not proceed as expected.
He said most of the judges were away yet the court requires at least five judges to be properly constituted.
"Following events of last night, Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu is not in a position to come to court.” Judge Maraga said.

By SAM KIPLAGAT
IBRAHIM ORUKO
Daily Nation

The hearing of an application seeking to stop tomorrow’s repeat presidential election has failed to take off after the Supreme Court suffered a quorum hitch.

Only Chief Justice Maraga and Justice Isaac Lenaola out of seven judges were present when the court convened at 11am.

3 VOTERS

Justice Maraga started off by regretting that the hearing will not proceed as expected.

He said most of the judges were away yet the court requires at least five judges to be properly constituted.

"Following events of last night, Deputy Chief Justice Philomena Mwilu is not in a position to come to court.” Judge Maraga said.

“Judge  Mohamed  Ibrahim is unwell  and is out of the country.”

He said Justice Jackton Ojwang and Smoking Wanjala  were not able to attend the court session while Justice Njoki Ndung’u was out of Nairobi and not able to come to court.

APPLICANTS

“The matter is adjourned to a date to be taken at the registry,” Justice Maraga said.

Three three members of the civil society has asked the apex court cancel or reschedule the election

Justice Maraga on Tuesday certified as urgent the case by Khelef Khalifa, Samuel Mohochi and Gacheke Gachihi.

Mr Khalif is the director at Muslim for Huma Rights, Mr Mohiochi is the executive director at the International Commission on Jurists (ICJ) while Mr Gachihi contested and lost the Mathare parliamentary seat.

The three activists argued that the prevailing political environment in the country cannot guarantee a credible poll.

POLL

They alleged that there exists an active sabotage of the fresh election, dealing a blow to IEBC ability and capacity to conduct a credible poll.

Further the three—through their lawyers John Khaminwa and Harun Ndubi— argued that IEBC commissioners are deeply divided and cannot guarantee a fair poll.

The impact of the apex court's decision to call off the sitting was not immediately clear but lawyers argued that it effectively paved way for the repeat poll to proceed as planned.

Since there were no orders issued stopping the repeat election, they argued that the Thursday poll would go on as planned.

They said it was clear that the orders sought by the three applicants could not be granted until after the repeat election.

No comments:

Post a Comment