Sunday, March 17, 2019

Aretha Franklin’s Family Fires Back After Wendy Williams Throws Shade at Upcoming Movie
Brian McCollum
Detroit Free Press
8:37 p.m. ET March 17, 2019

Dwane Casey downplays the Pistons’ three-game season sweep of the Raptors, analyzes 110-107 win on March 17, 2019 in Detroit.Vince Ellis

Aretha Franklin’s estate is blasting Wendy Williams for “irresponsible” and “mocking” remarks after the talk-show host attacked the late singer’s upcoming, long-delayed gospel film.

In a lengthy fact-checking statement Sunday, the Queen of Soul’s family said Williams made “inaccurate and disparaging statements” during a Friday segment about “Amazing Grace.” Shot in 1972, the church performance is set to hit screens nationwide in April.

Departing from widespread critical acclaim for the film, Williams questioned its visual quality, Franklin’s natural look and the motivations behind the movie’s release.

Franklin’s estate said Williams’ commentary “indicates that she has neither seen the documentary nor understands its import or intent.”

Williams also seemed to accuse Franklin’s family of mismanaging the singer's affairs through the years: “When you don’t have real professional people doing real professional things for you, sometimes you lose out.”

The family's response pushed back: “Contrary to Williams’ derisive reference, there is no 'Cousin Junebug' making decisions for the Estate."

“Amazing Grace” will hit theaters nationwide April 19 after events in Detroit and other cities. Shot by Sydney Pollack at an L.A. church while Franklin recorded her top-selling gospel album of the same name, the footage was abandoned for decades before being shaped into a final cut by UCLA music professor Alan Elliott.

Though Franklin told the Detroit Free Press in 2015 “I love the film itself,” she stonewalled the release, securing two court injunctions and saying she had not licensed use of her likeness.

Following her death in August, her estate cleared the way for the film’s premiere, and early screenings have earned glowing reviews from critics.

On Friday’s episode of “The Wendy Williams Show,” Williams set out to sympathize with Franklin resistance to the movie, calling it a “one-camera shot” (Pollack used five cameras) and pointing out Franklin’s unglamorous appearance in the church setting.

The family fired back in its statement.

“1972 was the era of Black Power and Black Is Beautiful," the estate said. "In her short natural hair and simple makeup, Ms. Franklin was in step with the times and appropriate to the occasion. There was no ‘showgirl glamor,’ no ‘pressed hair’ and no ‘eyelashes’ – the lack of which Williams ridiculed on her program. The simplicity of the presentation gives ‘Amazing Grace’ its power.”

Williams also speculated that the film is being released only because Franklin’s estate is in a financial “mess.”

“I would imagine that now the bill collectors are like, ‘OK, rest in peace, Aretha Franklin. But we still need our money for this, we need money for that,’” Williams said, prompting “oohs” from her audience. “So by putting this movie out, I would say the estate is probably going to be paying bills with this.”

Franklin’s estate said the talk-show host was perpetuating falsehoods in the era of "fake news."

“While Franklin had initially imposed an injunction on ‘Amazing Grace,’ her objections had nothing to do with its quality; negotiations were incomplete at the time of her death,” the statement read.

The Free Press was unable to reach Williams or a spokesman for a response on Sunday.

Full response from Aretha Franklin's estate to Wendy Williams on 'Amazing Grace'

Aretha Franklin was an icon, a musical genius, and a much-awarded American cultural treasure. Therefore, it is astounding that on the March 15, 2019, broadcast of The Wendy Williams Show, host Wendy Williams made a series of inaccurate and disparaging statements about the Aretha Franklin concert film “Amazing Grace,” which opens in limited theaters on April 5, 2019, and nationally on April 19, 2019. Her commentary indicates that she has neither seen the documentary nor understands its import or intent.

First, “Amazing Grace” was conceived as a documentary. The footage was shot by Oscar-winning director Sydney Pollack in anticipation of broadcasting a once-in-a-lifetime event – a live gospel album recording – but was never completed for technical reasons. The film remnants were rediscovered, restored and championed over two decades by producer Alan Elliott. As such, the unburnished images capture Aretha Franklin in New Temple Missionary Baptist Church in Los Angeles in 1972, as a premiere R&B and gospel interpreter who had just notched eight consecutive R&B Number One hits. Ms. Franklin had specifically sought to perform in a stripped-down, church-service setting. By showing a brief clip out of context and mocking its quality on her show, Williams inaccurately represented Ms. Franklin and the movie to her audience.

Second, 1972 was the era of Black Power, and Black Is Beautiful. In her short natural hair and simple makeup, Ms. Franklin was in step with the times and appropriate to the occasion. There was no “showgirl glamor,” no “pressed hair” and no “eyelashes” – the lack of which Williams ridiculed on her program.  The simplicity of the presentation gives “Amazing Grace” its power. Scholars, film critics, pop culture experts, and Hollywood stalwarts have raved about the film, including Oscar-winning director Spike Lee, who recently came aboard as a producer and told Variety the film is “mesmerizing and transformative.”

Third, Williams mentioned that Ms. Franklin “made an album from this.” She failed to note that the album is Aretha Franklin’s seminal recording “Amazing Grace,” which sold more than two million copies, earned a Grammy Award, and is still the biggest-selling live gospel album of all time. By not highlighting this fact, Williams further diminished both the documentary and Ms. Franklin’s legacy.

Fourth, Williams’ statement that “Nobody’s going to the movies to see a one-shot deal, like black-and-white,” is punitive and misinformed. Thousands if not millions are clamoring to see this full-color film; many have already enjoyed repeated viewings during last December’s  Oscar-qualifying one-week run in L.A. and N.Y., where the film earned glowing reviews in publications from Rolling Stone to The New York Times. “Amazing Grace” earned a 95-average rating on Metacritic and a 96 critical score at Rotten Tomatoes.

Finally, Williams suggests that the Franklin Estate sought national distribution for “Amazing Grace” to satisfy the singer’s outstanding debts. This is not true. It is only through the approval of the Estate and the efforts of the film’s producers that it is finally being seen. The public rollout for “Amazing Grace” – which includes screenings at African American museums and black churches this month – has received support from African American pastors and fans across the country. And while Franklin had initially imposed an injunction on “Amazing Grace,” her objections had nothing to do with its quality; negotiations were incomplete at the time of her death.  Her family feels this documentary is another prime example of The Queen of Soul’s genius. 

Williams gave additional false information in her March 15 program. Sabrina Owens, Ms. Franklin’s niece and executor of her estate, has never been head of the singer’s security detail. Ms. Owens is a career professional who holds a Master’s degree and is employed as a chief negotiator at one of the nation’s top public universities. Further, she is the personal representative of her mother’s estate, singer and songwriter Erma Franklin. Owens also created the blueprint for Franklin’s Celebration of Life and week-long homegoing services. None of Ms. Franklin’s four sons has ever served as her manager. However, Franklin’s brother, Rev. Cecil Franklin, who was a Morehouse College graduate was her manager for more than 30 years, until his death in December 1989. Contrary to Williams’ derisive reference, there is no “Cousin Junebug” making decisions for the Estate.

Wendy Williams is the host of the most-watched daytime gossip show in syndicated television. However, that does not give her license to offer misleading commentary about a legacy entertainer based on unverified information. In this instance, the show’s research team let Williams down. At a time when the media is fighting a battle against “fake news,” Williams’ continues to perpetuate false facts, and her commentary was irresponsible.

No comments:

Post a Comment