Monday, March 16, 2009

A.I.G. Planning Huge Bonuses After $170 Billion Bailout

March 15, 2009

A.I.G. Planning Huge Bonuses After $170 Billion Bailout

New York Times

WASHINGTON — The American International Group, which has received more than $170 billion in taxpayer bailout money from the Treasury and Federal Reserve, plans to pay about $165 million in bonuses by Sunday to executives in the same business unit that brought the company to the brink of collapse last year.

Word of the bonuses last week stirred such deep consternation inside the Obama administration that Treasury Secretary Timothy F. Geithner told the firm they were unacceptable and demanded they be renegotiated, a senior administration official said. But the bonuses will go forward because lawyers said the firm was contractually obligated to pay them.

The payments to A.I.G.’s financial products unit are in addition to $121 million in previously scheduled bonuses for the company’s senior executives and 6,400 employees across the sprawling corporation. Mr. Geithner last week pressured A.I.G. to cut the $9.6 million going to the top 50 executives in half and tie the rest to performance.

The payment of so much money at a company at the heart of the financial collapse that sent the broader economy into a tailspin almost certainly will fuel a popular backlash against the government’s efforts to prop up Wall Street. Past bonuses already have prompted President Obama and Congress to impose tough rules on corporate executive compensation at firms bailed out with taxpayer money.

A.I.G., nearly 80 percent of which is now owned by the government, defended its bonuses, arguing that they were promised last year before the crisis and cannot be legally canceled. In a letter to Mr. Geithner, Edward M. Liddy, the government-appointed chairman of A.I.G., said at least some bonuses were needed to keep the most skilled executives.

“We cannot attract and retain the best and the brightest talent to lead and staff the A.I.G. businesses — which are now being operated principally on behalf of American taxpayers — if employees believe their compensation is subject to continued and arbitrary adjustment by the U.S. Treasury,” he wrote Mr. Geithner on Saturday.

Still, Mr. Liddy seemed stung by his talk with Mr. Geithner, calling their conversation last Wednesday “a difficult one for me” and noting that he receives no bonus himself. “Needless to say, in the current circumstances,” Mr. Liddy wrote, “I do not like these arrangements and find it distasteful and difficult to recommend to you that we must proceed with them.”

An A.I.G. spokeswoman said Saturday that the company had no comment beyond the letter. The bonuses were first reported by The Washington Post.

The senior government official, who was not authorized to speak on the record, said the administration was outraged. “It is unacceptable for Wall Street firms receiving government assistance to hand out million-dollar bonuses, while hard-working Americans bear the burden of this economic crisis,” the official said.

Of all the financial institutions that have been propped up by taxpayer dollars, none has received more money than A.I.G. and none has infuriated lawmakers more with practices that policy makers have called reckless.

The bonuses will be paid to executives at A.I.G.’s financial products division, the unit that wrote trillions of dollars’ worth of credit-default swaps that protected investors from defaults on bonds backed in many cases by subprime mortgages.

The bonus plan covers 400 employees, and the bonuses range from as little as $1,000 to as much as $6.5 million. Seven executives at the financial products unit were entitled to receive more than $3 million in bonuses.

Mr. Liddy, whom Federal Reserve and Treasury officials recruited after A.I.G. faltered last September and received its first round of bailout money, said the bonuses and “retention pay” had been agreed to in early 2008 and were for the most part legally required.

The company told the Treasury that there were two categories of bonus payments, with the first to be given to senior executives. The administration official said Mr. Geithner had told A.I.G. to revise them to protect taxpayer dollars and tie future payments to performance.

The second group of bonuses covers some 2008 retention payments from contracts entered into before government involvement in A.I.G. Indeed, in his letter to Mr. Geithner, Mr. Liddy wrote that he had shown the details of the $450 million bonus pool to outside lawyers and been told that A.I.G. had no choice but to follow through with the payment schedule.

The administration official said the Treasury Department did its own legal analysis and concluded that those contracts could not be broken. The official noted that even a provision recently pushed through Congress by Senator Christopher J. Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, had an exemption for such bonus agreements already in place.

But the official said the administration will force A.I.G. to eventually repay the cost of the bonuses to the taxpayers as part of the agreement with the firm, which is being restructured.

A.I.G. did cut other bonuses, Mr. Liddy explained, but those were part of the compensation for people who dealt in other parts of the company and had no direct involvement with the derivatives.

Mr. Liddy wrote that A.I.G. hoped to reduce its retention bonuses for 2009 by 30 percent. He said the top 25 executives at the financial products division had also agreed to reduce their salary for the rest of 2009 to $1.

Ever since it was bailed out by the government last fall, A.I.G. has been defending itself against accusations that it was richly compensating people who caused one of the biggest financial crises in American history.

A.I.G.’s main business is insurance, but the financial products unit sold hundreds of billions of dollars’ worth of derivatives, the notorious credit-default swaps that nearly toppled the entire company last fall.

A.I.G. had set up a special bonus pool for the financial products unit early in 2008, before the company’s near collapse, when problems stemming from the mortgage crisis were becoming clear and there were concerns that some of the best-informed derivatives specialists might leave. It locked in a total amount, $450 million, for the financial products unit and prepared to pay it in a series of installments, to encourage people to stay.

Only part of the payments had been made by last fall, when A.I.G. nearly collapsed. In documents provided to the Treasury, A.I.G. said it was required to pay about $165 million in bonuses on or before Sunday. That is in addition to $55 million in December.

Under a deal reached last week, A.I.G. agreed that the top 50 executives would get half of the $9.6 million they were supposed to get by March 15. The second half of their bonuses would be paid out in two installments in July and in September. To get those payments, Treasury officials said, A.I.G. would have to show that it had made progress toward its goal of selling off business units and repaying the government.

The financial products unit is now being painstakingly wound down.

Mary Williams Walsh contributed reporting.


Pan-African News Wire said...

Monday, March 16, 2009
07:00 Mecca time, 04:00 GMT

Outrage against AIG set to mount

AIG is the largest recipient of taxpayer bailout money so far at $173bn

Outrage against American International Group (AIG) is set to grow after the ailing insurance giant said that more than half the taxpayer bailout money it has received has been paid to investment firm Goldman Sachs and several European banks.

AIG's disclosure on Sunday that Goldman and the banks had received $90bn out of the $173bn of bailout money it received, came as US government officials and politicians expressed anger at the $165m in bonuses that AIG said it had to pay its employees.

AIG said it paid out $90bn to firms such as Goldman Sachs – formerly led by Henry Paulson, who was treasury secretary at the time of the original AIG bailout - and to European banks such as Deutsche Bank, Societe Generale and Barclays.

While the payments were not illegal, the fact that billions of dollars given to prop up AIG were then transferred to European banks and Goldman Sachs could raise new doubts about whether the bailout was economically necessary.

Through three separate types of transactions, Goldman Sachs received $12.9bn. Among the European banks, Societe Generale was the biggest recipient at $11.9bn, Deutsche Bank got $11.8bn and Barclays was paid $8.5bn, AIG said.

The list was made public by AIG amid growing pressure on the insurer to disclose the true beneficiaries of the bailout, ahead of a congressional hearing on Wednesday at which Edward Liddy, AIG's chairman and chief executive, is expected to testify.

Anger over bonuses

Over the weekend, US government officials and politicians expressed outrage at the $165m in bonuses AIG is paying its employees.

AIG, which has already received US taxpayer bailouts of more than $170bn, argues that if it does not pay, it risks lawsuits by disgruntled employees and risks losing workers trying to clean up the company's financial mess - some $1.6bn in derivatives linked to toxic mortgages.

AIG declared earlier this month that it had suffered a loss of $61.7bn for the fourth quarter of last year, the largest corporate loss in history.

The insurance company says it is paying out the bonuses to meet a Sunday deadline, but it has agreed to requests by the Obama administration to restrain future payments.

The administration expressed unhappiness over the payouts but the US treasury department determined that the government did not have the legal authority to block the current payments.

Lawrence Summers, the director of the National Economic Council, told local media on Sunday that the bonuses were "outrageous".

Summers said Timothy Geithner, the treasury secretary, had
"negotiated very forcefully" with AIG and done all that was "legally permissible" to limit the payments.

But he added: "We are a country of law. There are contracts. The government cannot just abrogate contracts."

The large bulk of the payments at issue cover AIG Financial Products, the unit of the company that sold credit default swaps, the risky contracts that caused massive losses for the insurer.

AIG said it was contractually obligated to pay $165m of previously awarded "retention pay" to employees of the unit by March 15.

'Hands tied'

Geithner has asked AIG to scale back future bonus payments where legally possible, an administration official said.

In a letter to Geithner dated Saturday, Liddy said that "quite frankly, AIG's hands are tied", although he said that in light of the company's current situation he found it "distasteful and difficult" to recommend going forward with the payments.

Liddy said the company had entered into the bonus agreements in early 2008 before AIG got into severe financial straits and took a government bailout last fall.

The company said it would work to reduce the amounts paid for 2009 and believed it could trim those payments by at least 30 per cent.

Bonus programmes at financial companies have come under close scrutiny after the government began loaning them billions of taxpayer dollars to keep them afloat, and AIG is the largest recipient of bailout money so far.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Steven said...

The government owns AIG. Contracts be damned. These execs violated their contracts by moral turpitude. The government can indict a ham sandwich! Send them all to Guantanamo or allow them to commit suicide, once they've made restitution plus damages.

Steven said...

The government owns AIG. Contracts be damned. These execs violated their contracts by moral turpitude. The government can indict a ham sandwich! Send them all to Guantanamo or allow them to commit suicide, once they've made restitution plus damages.

Steven Dalos said...

The government owns AIG. Contracts be damned. These execs violated their contracts by moral turpitude. The government can indict a ham sandwich! Send them all to Guantanamo or allow them to commit suicide, once they've made restitution plus damages.