Friday, July 17, 2009

History-making Aid for Palestine Reaches Gaza

History-making aid for Palestine reaches Gaza

Published Jul 15, 2009 8:54 PM
http://www.vivapalestina-us.org

July 15-—The largest humanitarian aid convoy in history to travel from the U.S. to Palestine succeeded in crossing the Rafah border into Gaza late today. After days of delay, the 218-person contingent of activists, buoyed by telegrams, emails and protests from many parts of the world, was finally allowed to pass into the besieged Palestinian enclave with more than $1 million in wheelchairs, walkers and medical supplies for the people of Gaza.

A genocidal attack on Gaza in December and January, on top of a two-year Israeli siege and blockade of the area, prompted British Member of Parliament George Galloway to organize the Viva Palestina caravans as a way to provide essential aid to a people under occupation who have been denied the most basic necessities of life.

The fact that this caravan hails from the U.S. gives it added resonance, as Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. government aid in the world. And Israel uses U.S. weapons and missiles against the Palestinian people on a daily basis.

The delegation received a heroes’ welcome from the people of Gaza. Its members include Galloway, New York City Council Member Charles Barron and former U.S. Congressperson Cynthia McKinney, who was imprisoned just a few weeks earlier by Israeli forces for attempting to bring aid into Gaza by sea with the Free Gaza Movement. Also participating are representatives of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, Middle East Children’s Alliance, Cuba Coalition, Malcolm X Grassroots Movement, Movimiento Estudiantil Chicano de Aztlán (MEChA), International Action Center, the Answer Coalition, International Socialist Organization and Workers World Party.

—Information from John Parker in Gaza
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Articles copyright 1995-2009 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Page printed from:
http://www.workers.org/2009/world/vivapalestina_0723/

Thursday, July 16, 2009

Cynthia McKinney Arrives in Gaza With Viva Palestina

via: Sis. Cynthia McKinney
=====================

The Viva Palestina convoy, led by George Galloway, is about to leave Gaza after having been permitted to enter for a period of 24 hours after waiting 11 days in Cairo for permission to enter Gaza. That in and of itself is a major story when expanded to include the inability of Gazans to exit The Strip--even if only to enter another part of their country, the West Bank or to move about freely in the fictional "Palestinian State."

I say fictional because it continues to dwindle even while peace talks are underway. Fictional, because Palestinian elections deemed by international observers to be free and fair, don't count if the US- and Israel-approved party loses, and the winners get to sit for years in an Israeli jail. Fictional, because they use Israel's currency here, the shekel, and the international roaming on our US cell phones indicates calls are from Israel.

Gaza is beautiful. Gaza is full of life, despite Israel's Operation Cast Lead. And now, I have seen, Gaza has been bombed to smithereens. I think I've mastered my video camera enough to share some images with you. I'll post them on the sites below when I return. In the meantime, my fellow Americans and citizens of the world, we have a lot to do to put right all the wrong things done in our name. Much love to all of you who helped me, guided me, prayed for me, to make this successful entry into Gaza happen.

Viva Palestina!!
Free Gaza!!

http://www.livestream.com/dignity
http://dignity.ning.com/
http://www.twitter.com/dignityaction
http://www.myspace.com/dignityaction
http://www.myspace.com/runcynthiarun
http://www.twitter.com/cynthiamckinney
http://www.facebook.com/CynthiaMcKinney

ACLU Declares Victory for Rev. Pinkney of Benton Harbor Who Was Sentenced to Prison for Criticizing Judge

ACLU Declares Victory for Minister Sentenced to Prison for Criticizing Judge
Court of Appeals Reverses 3-10 Year Sentence

Text of Michigan Appeals Court Decision
http://www.aclumich.org/sites/default/files/file/pinkneydecision.pdf

IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

July 15, 2009

DETROIT – The American Civil Liberties Union of Michigan applauded a unanimous Michigan Court of Appeals decision today upholding the free speech rights of a Benton Harbor minister who was sentenced to 3-10 years in prison for writing a newspaper article that harshly criticized the judge who presided over his trial.

“The Court of Appeals opinion reaffirms the basic American value that citizens cannot be imprisoned for criticizing government officials or expressing their religious beliefs,” said Michael J. Steinberg, ACLU of Michigan Legal Director. “To our knowledge, this case marks the first time in modern history that a preacher has been thrown in prison for predicting what God might do.”

In 2007, Rev. Pinkney was sentenced to probation for violating Michigan election law. But his probation was revoked and he was resentenced to 3-10 years in prison solely because of an article he wrote for a small Chicago newspaper. Quoting a passage from the Bible, Rev. Pinkney predicted that God would “curse” the judge unless he "hearken[ed] unto the voice of the Lord thy God to observe [and] to do all that is right." Rev. Pinkney also expressed his opinion in the article that the judge was racist, dumb, and corrupt.

In its ruling today, the Court of Appeals said that the trial court’s probation condition that prohibited “defamatory and demeaning” communications is unconstitutional.

“To the extent that the prohibition of defamatory and demeaning behavior impinges on defendant’s first amendment rights,” wrote the judges, “the prohibition was not proper, as it was not directly related to defendant’s rehabilitation or to the protection of the public.”

The ACLU of Michigan represented Rev. Edward Pinkney’s first amendment claims; however, the organization was not involved in the underlying voter fraud conviction, which was upheld today. Due to this conviction, Rev. Pinkney’s probation will be reinstated.

Rev. Pinkney is a Baptist minister in Benton Harbor, a predominantly African American community with a troubled relationship with its predominantly white sister city, St. Joseph. Rev. Pinkney has long been an outspoken community activist and advocate, frequently denouncing injustice and racial inequality in Benton Harbor, its local government, and the Berrien County criminal justice system in particular.

In March, three friend-of-the-court briefs were submitted in support of the ACLU position – one from a diverse coalition of more than a dozen national and religious organizations including the National Association of Evangelicals, the American Jewish Congress, the Christian Legal Society and the Baptist Joint Committee for Religious Liberty; one from 18 law professors from all five Michigan law schools; and one from the Thomas Jefferson Center for Freedom of Expression.

In addition to Steinberg, Rev. Pinkney is represented by ACLU staff attorney Dan Korobkin, and ACLU Cooperating Attorneys James J. Walsh and Rebecca O’Reilly of the law firm Bodman LLP. Walsh argued the case in the Court of Appeals.

15th Non-Aligned Movement Summit Opens in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt; President Mugabe of Zimbabwe Delivers Address

NAM summit opens

From Mabasa Sasa in SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt
Courtesy of the Zimbabwe Herald Newspaper

THE 15th Non-Aligned Movement Summit opened here yesterday with heads of state and government expected to pass a resolution rejecting the unilateral imposition of sanctions and calling for the strengthening of the organisation to effectively deal with such challenges as the global economic crisis.

The nearly 60 leaders in attendance, including President Mugabe, are likely to adopt the Sharm El-Sheikh Declaration today, that, among other things, calls for an end to big power practices that undermine international law and the United Nations Charter.

In his address to the summit, outgoing chair of the 118-member bloc Cde Raul Castro, the President of Cuba, said industrialised countries were the source of the economic crisis and called for an "equitable economic system especially in light of the present crisis".

"Every country in the world must seek just solutions to the global economic crisis. We call for a new monetary and economic world order. We must restructure the world financial system to take into consideration the needs of developing countries," he said.

Cde Castro said NAM, by virtue of its huge membership, had the power to take the fight to the West — a message that was echoed by Libyan President Colonel Muammar Gaddafi — who is also African Union chairman — in his address to the summit.

Accepting the NAM chairmanship, host President Hosni Mubarak said a new international trade order was needed to end the unjust system that continuously widened the gap between the rich Western nations that perpetuate it and the poor South.

Earlier in the day, Foreign Affairs ministers handed over the draft Sharm El-Sheikh Declaration for consideration by the heads of state and their representatives.

The ministers approved a declaration, which, if given the nod by NAM leaders, will call for a rejection of "the unilateral sanctions imposed on some countries by the West in contradiction of international law and the principles and purposes of the United Nations Charter".

While there would be no specific declaration on Zimbabwe, it is expected that the Outcome Document would contain a call for the immediate lifting of illegal sanctions imposed on the country by some Western countries.

NAM, in March 2003, condemned the illegal embargo on Zimbabwe.

The final Sharm El-Sheikh Declaration is also expected to touch on issues of peace, security and terrorism; human rights and human trafficking; the reform of the UN; the economic crisis, food security and climate change, among other topical issues.


Reform IMF, WB: President

From Mabasa Sasa in SHARM EL-SHEIKH, Egypt
Zimbabwe Herald Newspaper

PRESIDENT Mugabe has challenged the Non-Aligned Movement to assess its relevance and lead the process of reforming multilateral financial lending institutions and the United Nations in pursuit of a more equitable global order.

Addressing the plenary session of the NAM Heads of State and Government Summit that opened here yesterday, President Mugabe said Western interference in the domestic affairs of smaller nations was on the increase and it was time the developing world used its numerical advantage to institute changes in international relations.

He said it was his hope that the Bretton Woods institutions would soon be brought under the control of the United Nations General Assembly for the sake of fairness in the manner in which the IMF and World Bank deal with developing countries.

"The Movement cannot afford a business-as-usual approach. Hard questions beckon we need to go beyond the current practice of debates and the adoption of action plans that rarely see the light of day.

"Our clear and present challenge is a timeous, effective and unapologetic responsibility of delivering a just, peaceful and equitable world order.

"The Non-Aligned Movement faces renewed attempts by some Western countries to interfere in the internal affairs of NAM member countries. This ‘big brother is watching’ state of affairs is a grave danger to international peace and security.

"The severity of the machinations by the Western world has often manifested itself in a number of ways, including the use of surreptitious and illegal attempts by some Western countries to abuse the UN Security Council to unjustly punish developing countries through the imposition of illegal and unilateral sanctions, and other intimidatory measures," he said.

President Mugabe said Zimbabwe "was a target of these abhorrent machinations" and it was imperative that the entire UN system be reformed and democratised.

"We need to recognise that for as long as the UN retains its present form, it will continue to be abused by the mighty, haughty and militarily powerful to victimise the smaller and weaker nations.

"The international financial system, symbolised by the Bretton Woods institutions in particular, is similarly in dire need of reform," he said.

He said the fact that the global economic crisis had originated in the West demonstrated that these countries could not be trusted to oversee the international financial system.

"I am glad that the high-level meeting on global financial and economic crisis that was recently held at the United Nations headquarters in New York recommended that these institutions (IMF and World Bank) be put under the control of the UN General Assembly.

"This would no doubt make them more accountable and responsive to the needs of the majority of UN members, including developing countries."

President Mugabe pointed out that while the financial crisis started in the West, its effects were most keenly felt in developing countries where there was depressed demand for products, company closures, heightened unemployment and deepening poverty.

As a result, he said, many NAM members were unlikely to meet the Millennium Development Goals.

He said while NAM should pursue development collaborations with everyone, it was in South-South co-operation where real salvation lay because the West sought to divide and weaken developing countries through instruments such as economic partnership agreements.

"The EPAs are threatening our various regional economic integration, thus weakening and eroding the collective negotiating and bargaining positions which we have traditionally held."

President Mugabe briefed his fellow leaders on political developments in the country that led to the formation of the inclusive Government and assured them that the principals of the three parties to the arrangement were committed to making it work.

He, however, said sanctions continued to mitigate against progress, while thanking Sadc, the African Union and NAM for their support for the country.

"They (the West) are still bent on their goal of effecting regime change in my country. We count on your continued solidarity and support in our endeavour to improve the quality of life of our people."

He warned Britain and the United States of America to steer clear of Zimbabwe's internal issues, saying democracy did not work when outsiders subverted the will of indigenous peoples.

On the issue of nuclear proliferation, President Mugabe questioned why countries like North Korea were vilified for developing arms and yet other countries had large stockpiles of the weapons.

He said Zimbabwe’s position was that not only should countries limit their nuclear capability, but they should in fact totally disarm.

The President reiterated his Government’s unwavering support for the people of Palestine and called on Israel to stop the crimes against humanity it was committing in the Middle East.

He expressed his gratitude to NAM members for their co-operation during Zimbabwe's chairmanship of the just-ended Third Preparatory Conference for the 2010 Review of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

President Mugabe congratulated his Egyptian counterpart Hosni Mubarak on assuming the chairmanship of NAM and assured him that Zimbabwe would support him fully, while thanking Cuba's Cde Raul Castro for his sterling work during his leadership of the bloc.

The XV NAM Summit is being held under the theme "International Solidarity for Peace and Development" and ends today.

Washington and the Coup in Honduras: Here's the Evidence

Wednesday, July 15, 2009
http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id855

Eva Golinger: Washington and the Coup in Honduras: Here's the evidence!

The US Department of State had prior knowledge of the coup.

The Department of State and the US Congress funded and advised the actors and organizations in Honduras that participated in the coup.

The Pentagon trained, schooled, commanded, funded and armed the Honduran armed forces that perpetrated the coup and that continue to repress the people of Honduras by force.

Eva Golinger: The US military presence in Honduras, that occupies the Soto Cano (Palmerola) military base, authorized the coup d'etat through its tacit complicity and refusal to withdraw its support of the Honduran military involved in the coup.

The US Ambassador in Tegucigalpa, Hugo Llorens, coordinated the removal from power of President Manuel Zelaya, together with Assistant Secretary of State Thomas Shannon and John Negroponte, who presently works as an advisor to US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

From the first day the coup occurred, Washington has referred to "both parties" involved and the necessity for "dialogue" to restore constitutional order, legitimizing the coup leaders by regarding them as equal players instead of criminal violators of human rights and democratic principles. The US Department of State has refused to legally classify the events in Honduras as a "coup d'etat," nor has it suspended or frozen its economic aid or commerce to Honduras, and has taken no measures to effectively pressure the de facto regime.

Washington manipulated the Organization of American States (OAS) in order to buy time, therefore allowing the coup regime to consolidate and weaken the possibility of President Zelaya's immediate return to power, as part of a strategy still in place that simply seeks to legitimate the de facto regime and wear down the Honduran people that still resist the coup.

Secretary of State Clinton and her spokesmen stopped speaking of President Zelaya's return to power after they designated Costa Rican President Oscar Arias as the "mediator" between the coup regime and the constitutional government; and now the State Department refers to the dictator that illegally took power during the coup, Roberto Micheletti, as the "interim caretaker president."

The strategy of "negotiating" with the coup regime was imposed by the Obama administration as a way of discrediting President Zelaya -- blaming him for provoking the coup -- and legitimizing the coup leaders.

Members of the US Congress -- democrats and republicans -- organized a visit of representatives from the coup regime in Honduras to Washington, receiving them with honors in different arenas in the US capital.

Despite the fact that originally it was Republican Senator John McCain who coordinated the visit of the coup regime representatives to Washington through a lobby firm connected to his office ... The Cormac Group ... now, the illegal regime is being represented by top notch lobbyist and Clinton attorney Lanny Davis, who is using his pull and influence in Washington to achieve overall acceptance -- cross party lines -- of the coup regime in Honduras.

Otto Reich and a Venezuelan named Robert Carmona-Borjas, known for his role as attorney for the dictator Pedro Carmona during the April 2002 coup d'etat in Venezuela, aided in preparing the groundwork for the coup against President Zelaya in Honduras.

The team designated from Washington to design and help prepare the coup in Honduras also included a group of US ambassadors recently named in Central America, experts in destabilizing efforts against the Cuban revolution, and Adolfo Franco, ex administrator for USAID's Cuba "transition to democracy" program.

No one doubts that the fingerprints of Washington are all over the coup d'etat against President Manuel Zelaya that began last June 28. Many analysts, writers, activists and even presidents, have denounced this role.

Nevertheless, the majority coincide in excusing the Obama Administration from any responsibility in the Honduran coup, blaming instead the lingering remains of the Bush-Cheney era and the war hawks that still pace the halls of the White House. The evidence demonstrates that while it is certain that the usual suspects who perpetrate coups and destabilization activities in Latin America are involved, ample proof exists confirming the direct role of the new administration in Washington in the Honduran coup.

The US Department of State

The new form of diplomacy of the United States, known as "smart power," has played a principal role before, during and after the coup in Honduras. During a press briefing on July 1, spokesmen for the Department of State admitted to having prior knowledge of the coup in Honduras, clarifying that US diplomats had been meeting with the groups and actors planning the coup to encourage a different "solution" to their discontent with President Zelaya. [i]

The State Department also confirmed that two high level representatives from the Department, which included Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs Thomas Shannon and Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Craig Kelley, were in Honduras the week prior to the coup and maintained meetings with the civilian and military groups that later participated in the illegal overthrow of a democratically elected president. They state their mission was to "urge against" the coup, but evidently such verbal pressure was insufficient to discourage the actors involved in the coup, particularly considering the actions manifested by Washington contradicted those harsh words.

On the day of the coup, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton published a statement regarding the situation in Honduras. Despite the fact that governments around the world were quickly condemning the actions as a coup d'etat, Clinton's statement did not recognize the events in Honduras as a "coup d'etat" and also did not call for the return of President Zelaya to power.

Curiously, Clinton's statements from day one have referred to "all parties" of situation, legitimizing the coup leaders and somehow placing blame -- publicly -- on President Mel Zelaya for provoking his own overthrow: "The action taken against Honduran President Mel Zelaya violates the precepts of the Inter-American Democratic Charter, and thus should be condemned by all. We call on all parties in Honduras to respect the constitutional order and the rule of law, to reaffirm their democratic vocation, and to commit themselves to resolve political disputes peacefully and through dialogue. Honduras must embrace the very principles of democracy we reaffirmed at the OAS meeting it hosted less than one month ago." [ii]

And ever since, despite different references to a "coup" having occurred in Honduras, the Department of State has refused to legally classify what took place as a coup d'etat. By doing so, the US government would be obligated to suspend economic, diplomatic and military aid to Honduras, which apparently they are unwilling to do, since such a measure would substantially affect US interests in the Central American nation and the region.

On July 1, the spokesmen for the State Department explained their wavering on the coup question: "In regard to the coup itself, I think it would just -- it would be best to say that this was a coordinated effort between the military and some civilian political actors. Obviously, the military was the entity that conducted the forcible removal of the president and has acted as the securer of public order during this process.

"But for the coup to become more than an insurrection or a rebellion, you have to have an effort to transfer power. And in that regard, the congress -- the congress's decision to swear in its president, Micheletti, as the president of Honduras indicates that the congress and key members of that congress played an important role in this coup." [iii]

This position of ambiguity, that condemns the events in Honduras as a violation of constitutional order but doesn't go as far as classifying the situation as a coup d'etat and also doesn't call for the reinstatement of President Zelaya to the presidency, was ratified again after the meeting held between Secretary of State Clinton and President Zelaya on July 7.

Clinton made the following statement, "I just finished a productive meeting with President Zelaya. We discussed the events of the past nine days and the road ahead. I reiterated to him that the United States supports the restoration of the democratic constitutional order in Honduras. We continue to support regional efforts through the OAS to bring about a peaceful resolution that is consistent with the terms of the Inter-American Democratic Charter… We call upon all parties to refrain from acts of violence and to seek a peaceful, constitutional, and lasting solution to the serious divisions in Honduras through dialogue. To that end, we have been working with a number of our partners in the hemisphere to create a negotiation, a dialogue that could lead to a peaceful resolution of this situation." [iv]

Now it was clear, after this meeting, that Washington would no longer consider Zelaya's return to the presidency as a necessary solution but rather would lobby for a "negotiation" with the coup regime, that in the end, favors US interests. Sources that were present at the Organization of American States (OAS) meetings that took place after the coup affirm that the presence of a high-level US delegation intensified the pressure against other States to urge for a "negotiated" solution that didn't necessarily imply the return to power of President Zelaya.

This method of circumventing the main issue, manipulating the outcome and attempting to appear as though one position has been assumed when in reality, actions demonstrate the contrary, forms part of the new Obama doctrine of "smart power," which purports to achieve imperialist objectives without demonizing the government. "Smart Power" es "the capacity to combine ‘hard power' with ‘soft power' to achieve a victorious strategy. ‘Smart Power' strategically uses diplomacy, persuasion, capacity building, military power and economic and political influence, in an effective way with a political and social legitimacy."

Essentially, it's a mix of military force with all forms of diplomacy, with an emphasis in the use of "democracy promotion" as a principal tactic to strongy influence the destiny of societies, instead of a military invasion. [Note: Beware that "smart power" places an emphasis on the use of agencies like USAID and National Endowment for Democracy (NED) to do the ‘dirty work' of silently penetrating and infiltrating civil society organizations in order to promote a US agenda.

This explains Obama's call for an additional $320 million in "democracy promotion" funds for the 2010 budget just for use in Latin America. This is substantially a higher sum than the quantity requested and used in Latin America for "democracy promotion" by the Bush administration in its 8 years of government combined.]

The Ambassador

Journalist Jean-Guy Allard has revealed the origins of the current US Ambassador in Honduras, Hugo Llorens. [v]

Per Allard, Hugo Llorens, a Cuban national from birth who arrived in the United States as part of Operation Peter Pan, is "a specialist in terrorism…In 2002, George W. Bush's White House strategically placed the astute Llorens as Director of Andean Affairs at the National Security Council in Washington, D.C., which converted him into the principle advisor to the President on Venezuela. The coup d'etat in 2002 against Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez occurred during Llorens' tenure, who was working together with Assistant Secretary of State for Western Hemisphere Affairs, Otto Reich, and the very controversial Elliot Abrams. In July 2008, Llorens was named Ambassador to Honduras."

On June 4, 2009, just weeks before the coup d'etat against President Zelaya, Ambassador Llorens declared to the Honduran press that ."..One can't violate the Constitution in order to create another Constitution, because if one doesn't respect the Constitution, then we all live under the law of the jungle."[vi]

Those declarations were made in reference to the national opinion survey on the possibility of convening a constitutional convention during 2010, that would have taken place on June 28th if the coup d'etat against President Zelaya hadn't occurred. The commentaries made by Llorens evidence not only his position against the survey, but also his interference in the internal affairs of Honduras.

But Llorens wasn't alone in the region. After his nomination as US Ambassador in Honduras -- position that he was assigned to due to the urgent necessity to neutralize the growing presence of leftist governments in the region and impede the regional potency of ALBA -- several other US ambassadors were also named in neighboring nations, all experts in destabilizing the Cuban revolution and executing psychological warfare.

The diplomat Robert Blau arrived first to the US Embassy in El Salvador, on July 2, 2008, named as second in command. In January 2009, Blau became the Charge d'Affairs at the Embassy. Before arriving to El Salvador, Blau was Subdirector of Cuban Affairs at the Department of State in Washington, after working for two years at the US Interests Section in Havana, Cuba, as a Political Counselor. His work with Cuban dissidents was so successful that Blau was honored with the Department of State James Clement Dunn Award for Excellence. Llorens and Blau were old friends, after working together as part of Otto Reich's team in the State Department.

Soon after, Stephen McFarland was named as US Ambassador in Guatemala, on August 5, 2008. McFarland, a graduate of the National War College in the US, similar to Hugo Llorens and Robert Blau, and also a former member of Combat Team Number 2 of the US Marines in Iraq, was the second in command at the US Embassy in Venezuela during William Brownfield's tenure. Brownfield is known for achieving a substantial increase in State Department funding and strategic support for the Venezuelan opposition.

After Venezuela, McFarland was sent to the US Embassy in Paraguay to oversee the construction of the large US military base in that country that borders Bolivia. McFarland was also Director of Cuban Affairs at the State Department and his resumé claims he is an expert in "democratic transitions, human rights and security matters."

Ambassador Robert Callahan arrived to Managua, Nicaragua, also at the beginning of August. Callahan has worked at the US embassies in La Paz, Bolivia, and San José, Costa Rica, and was a distinguished professor at the National War College. In 2004, he was sent to Iraq as press attaché at the US Embassy in Baghdad.

Upon his return, he established the press and propaganda office at the newly created Directorate of National Intelligence (DNI) in Washington, which today is the most powerful entity in the US intelligence community.

Together, these ambassadors -- experts in coup d'etats, destabilization and propaganda -- prepared the terrain for the coup against President Zelaya in Honduras.

Funding the coup leaders

Just one month before the coup against President Zelaya occurred, a coalition of different organizations, business associations, political parties, high level members of the Catholic Church and private media outlets, was formed in opposition to Zelaya's policies. The coalition was called the "Democratic Civil Union of Honduras." It's only objective was to oust President Zelaya from power in order to impede the future possibility of a constitutional convention to reform the constitution, which would allow the people a voice and a role in their political process.

The "Democratic Civil Union of Honduras" is composed of organizations including the National Anticorruption Council, the Archbishop of Tegucigalpa, Honduran Council of Private Enterprise (COHEP), Council of University Deans, Worker's Federation of Honduras (CTH), National Convergence Forum, National Federation of Commerce and Industry of Honduras (FEDECAMARA), Association of Communication Media (AMC), the Group Peace & Democracy and the student group Generation for Change.

The majority of these organizations have been the beneficiaries of the more than $50 million annually disbursed by USAID and the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) for "democracy promotion" in Honduras. In fact, a USAID report regarding its funding and work with COHEP, described how the "low profile maintained by USAID in this project helped ensure the credibility of COHEP as a Honduran organization and not an arm of USAID." Which basically means that COHEP is, actually, an arm of USAID.

The spokespeople for the Democratic Civil Union of Honduras representing, according to them, "civil society," declared to the Honduran press on June 23rd -- five days before the coup took place against President Zelaya -- that they "trust the armed forces will comply with their responsibility to defend the Constitution, the Law, peace and democracy."

When the coup took place on June 28, they were the first to immediately claim that a coup had not occurred, but rather "democracy had been saved" from the hands of President Zelaya, whose crime was to attempt to give voice and visibility to the people. Representing the biased middle and upper-classes, the Democratic Civil Union has qualified Zelaya's supporters as "hoards."

The International Republican Institute (IRI), entity that receives funding from the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), received more than $1.2 million in 2009 to work with political groups in Honduras. IRI's work has been dedicated to supporting "think tanks" and "pressure groups" to influence political parties and "support initiatives to implement political positions during the campaigns in 2009." This is a clear example of intervention in the internal politics of Honduras and evidence of NED and IRI funding to those groups involved in the coup.

The Washington Lobby

Republican Senator John McCain, ex US presidential, helped coordinate the visit of a coup regime delegation to Washington last week. McCain is well known for his opposition to governments in Venezuela, Bolivia and other countries in the region considered "anti-imperialist."

McCain also maintains very close ties to the Cuban exile community in Miami. McCain is also Chairman of the Board of the International Republican Institute (IRI) that has funded the coup participants in Honduras. McCain offered the services of a lobby firm in Washington, closely tied to him, the Cormac Group, that organized a press conference for the coup regime delegation at the National Press Club on June 7th. McCain also helped set up several meetings in Congress with the traditional Cuban-American representatives and those general "Chavez-haters," such as Connie Mack, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen and Mel Martinez.

But beyond the Republican connection to the Honduran coup regime, there is a even more damning link to the current Democrat administration in Washington.

Lawyer Lanny Davis was hired by the Business Council of Latin America (CEAL) to lobby in favor of the coup regime and convince the powers in Washington to accept and recognize the de facto government in Honduras. Lanny Davis was special counsel to ex President Bill Clinton from 1996-1998 and he is a close friend and advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Davis is organizing a diplomatic offensive and public relations blitz in favor of the coup regime, including the strategic placement of advertisements in important US media that seek to legitimize the de facto Honduran government, and he is organizing meetings and hearings with members of Congress, the State Department and the White House.

CEAL represents the conservative business community in Latin America, including those that have promoted and participated in previous attempts to oust democratic governments via coup d'etats and/or other forms of sabotage. For example, the Venezuelan representative of CEAL is Marcel Granier, president of RCTV, the television station that heavily participated in the 2002 coup against President Chavez and that consistently has violated Venezuelan law in order to promote its political agenda.

As part of this offensive, Lanny Davis arranged a special hearing before the House Foreign Relations Committee, attended by high level members of Congress and overseen by Democrat Elliot Engel (congressman from New York). Testimonies were given at the hearing by representatives of the coup regime from Honduras and others who have supported the coup -- directly and indirectly -- such as Michael Shifter from the InterAmerican Dialogue, Guillermo Pérez-Cadalso, ex Honduran Foreign Minister and Supreme Court Judge, and the infamous Otto Reich, a Cuban-American well-known for his role in the majority of destabilization activities against leftist and progressive governments in Latin America throughout the eighties.

Reich, who was named Special Advisor on Latin America to President George W. Bush, also played a key role in the 2002 coup against President Chavez. As a result of this hearing, the US Congress is currently trying to pass a resolution that recognizes the coup regime in Honduras as a legitimate government.

Another consequence of Lanny Davis' lobbying efforts was the meeting arranged in the Council of the Americas Washington office on June 9. This event included the participation of Jim Swigert, Director of Programs in Latin America and the Caribbean for the National Democratic Institute (NDI), entity that receives its funding from NED & USAID, Cris Arcos, former US Ambassador to Honduras, and Adolfo Franco, ex USAID Administrator for Latin America and the Caribbean, and the director of the "transition to democracy" program for Cuba.

These three characters are working as advisors to the Obama administration on the Honduran crisis. Franco, who was previously advisor on foreign policy to John McCain during his presidential campaign in 2008, has been accused of corruption for his mismanagement of USAID funds destined for the Cuba "democracy" program. Franco diverted a large quantity of these funds, totaling over $40 million, to groups such as the Committee for a Free Cuba and the Institute for Cuban Studies in Miami, without adhering to a transparent process of funds disbursement.

Negroponte and Reich, again

Many analysts and specialists on Latin American have speculated on the role of former Ambassador to Honduras John Negroponte, who directed the paramilitary forces and death squads known as the "Contra" against leftist movements in Central America during the 1980s. Negroponte held various high level positions during the Bush administration, including US Ambassador to Iraq, US Ambassador to the United Nations, National Director of Intelligence and lastly, Sub-secretary of State, second only to Condoleezza Rice.

After leaving the Department of State in January 2009, Negroponte entered the private sector, as is custom amongst former top government officials. He was offered a job as Vicepresident at the most influential and powerful consulting firm in Washington, McLarty Associates. Negroponte accepted the job. McLarty Associates was founded by Thomas "Mack" McLarty, former chief of staff for President Bill Clinton and also Clinton's Special Envoy to Latin America.

Since the end of the Clinton administration, McLarty has managed the most powerful strategic consulting firm in Washington, which until just last year, was called Kissinger-McLarty Associates due to the merging of Thomas McLarty and Henry Kissinger. This partnership clearly evidenced the bi-partisan unions that truly craft the most important policies in Washington.

In his new role, John Negroponte presently works as Advisor to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Remember, the current US Ambassador to Honduras, Hugo Llorens, has worked closely under Negroponte's domain during the majority of his career. So it would not be a far jump to consider that John Negroponte, expert in crushing leftist movements in Central America, has played a role in the current coup against President Zelaya in Honduras.

Otto Reich has also been investing his energy during the last couple of years in a campaign against President Zelaya. The Honduran President actually threatened to sue Reich for defamation in April 2009, after Reich accused President Zelaya of stealing $100 million from the state-owned telecommunications company, Hondutel.

These accustations were never backed by evidence, and the truth was revealed soon after that explained Reich's interest in Hondutel. Through his consulting and lobbying firm, Otto Reich Associates, the Cuban-American was representing a multinational corporation that was pushing for the privatization of Hondutel, a move that Zelaya opposed. With President Zelaya out of the picture now, Reich is able to pursue the multi-million dollar deal.

Reich also co-founded an organization in Washington named Arcadia Foundation [vii] together with a Venezuelan, Robert Carmona-Borjas, a lawyer specialized in military law who is linked to the April 2002 coup d'etat in Venezuela, per his own resume. Robert Carmona-Borjas was in the Miraflores presidential palace in Caracas, Venezuela, together with the dictator Pedro Carmona, on the days of the coup, from April 11-12, 2002, and escaped, together with Carmona, when the palace was retaken by the presidential guard and constitutional order was restored.

He later fled to the United States after he was brought up on charges for his role in the coup d'etat in Venezuela, and became a university professor at George Washington University in Washington, D.C. (nice to see the warm welcome coup leaders and violators of democracy receive in the United States).

Since last year, Reich and Carmona-Borjas have been conducting a campaign against President Zelaya, accusing him of corruption and limiting private property rights. Through the Arcadia Foundation, they created a series of video clips that have been shown in different media, attempted to portray Zelaya as a corrupt President who violates the basic rights of the Honduran people. [viii]

Carmona-Borjas has traveled frequently to Honduras during the last few months, and even held public meetings where the coup against Zelaya was discussed openly. At one encounter where Carmona-Borjas was present, the Honduran Public Defender, Ramon Custodia, who was involved in the coup d'etat, declared to the press that "Coups are a possibility and can occur in any political environment." After the coup took place, Robert Carmona-Borjas appeared at a rally in support of the de facto regime, on July 3rd, and received the honors and applause from the coup leaders who declared him "an important actor" that "helped make possible" the removal from power of President Zelaya and the installment of the dictator Roberto Micheletti as de facto president. [ix]

Military Power

The United States maintains a large military presence in Honduras in the Soto Cano (Palmerola) base, located about 50 miles from the capital, Tegucigalpa, that has been actively operating since 1981, when it was heavily occupied by the Reagan Administration and used for its operations in Central America.

During the eighties, Soto Cano was used by Colonel Oliver North as a base of operations of the "Contra," the paramilitary forces trained, armed and funded by the CIA, and charged with executing warfare against all leftist movements in Central America, with particular focus on the neighboring Sandinista government in Nicaragua. From Soto Cano, the "Contra" launched terrorist attacks, psychological warfare (overseen by Otto Reich's Office for Public Diplomacy), death squads and special covert missions that resulted in the assassination of tens of thousands of farmers and civilians, thousands of disappeared, tortured, wounded and terrorized all throughout the region.

John Negroponte, US Ambassador at the time in Honduras, together with Oliver North and Otto Reich, directed and oversaw these dirty operations. They later became involved in the Iran-Contra scandal once the US Congress cut the funding for the paramilitary groups and death squads used by the Reagan Administration to neutralize the leftist movements in the region, and the Negroponte-North-Reich team sold arms to Iran to continue funding their covert operations.

The Soto Cano base houses the US Joint Task Force-Bravo military group, composed of members from the Army, Air Force, joint security forces and the First Battalion Regiment 228 of the US Air Force. The current total presence of US forces on the base numbers approximately 600, and includes 18 combat planes, UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters and CH-47 Chinook helicopters, used for special warfare operations. The Honduran Aviation Academy is also located on the Soto Cano Base. More than 650 Honduran and US citizens also live inside the base installations.

The Honduran Constitution does not permit legally the presence of foreign military in the country. A "handshake" agreement was made between Washington and Honduras authorizing the "semi-permanent" important and strategic presence of hundreds -- at times thousands -- of US military personnel on the base.

The agreement was made in 1954, in exchange for the multi-million dollar aid the US provides to the Honduran armed forces, which ranges from training programs, arms and military equipment and joint exercises and operations that take place on the ground in Honduras. The base was first employed by the US military and CIA to launch the coup d'etat against Jacobo Arbenz in Guatemala in 1954.

Each year, Washington authorizes hundreds of millions of dollars in military and economic aid to Honduras, which is the third poorest country in the Western Hemisphere, after Haiti and Nicaragua. This "exchange" securing the US military presence in the Central American nation can be terminated at any time by the Honduran government, without much notice.

On May 31, 2008, President Manuel Zelaya announced that Soto Cano (Palmerola) would be converted into an international civilian airport. The construction of the airport terminal would be financed with a fund from the Bolivarian Alliance of the Americas (ALBA -- of which Bolivia, Cuba, Ecuador, Dominique, Honduras, Nicaragua, St. Vicents, Antigua & Barbados and Venezuela are members). This obviously was a huge threat to the future US military presence in Honduras.

The two generals that have participated in key roles in the coup against President Zelaya are both graduates of the US School of the Americas, famous for training dictators, torturers and repressors in Latin America, and they maintain very close ties with the US military forces based in Honduras.

The Commander of the Honduran Air Force, General Luis Javier Prince Suazo, studied in the famous School of the Americas in 1996. The Head of the Honduran High Military Command, General Romeo Vasquez, who was fired by President Zelaya on June 24, 2009, for disobeying the president's orders, and later appeared as the principal actor in the military coup just days later, is also a graduate of the School of the Americas. These two high level military officers also maintain close contact with the Pentagon and the Southern Command.

The US Ambassador in Honduras through September 2008, when Hugo Llorens was appointed to the position, Charles Ford, was transferred from Honduras to the Southern Command in Florida and charged with providing "strategic advising" to the Pentagon about Latin America, a position he holds today.

The Honduran military are funded, trained, schooled and commanded by the US military. They have been indoctrinated with the anti-leftist, anti-socialist, pro-empire mentality since the beginning of the Cold War. The Generals and high level officers involved in the coup in Honduras have publicly stated that they were "obligated" to remove President Zelaya from power because of the "threat" he posed with his "leftist" ideology and alignment to socialist nations in the region such as Venezuela and Cuba.

Per one Honduran colonel, "'We fought the subversive movements here and we were the only country that did not have a fratricidal war like the others…It would be difficult for us, with our training, to have a relationship with a leftist government. That's impossible. I personally would have retired, because my thinking, my principles, would not have allowed me to participate in that.''[x]

All of the above evidence -- and certainly more to come in the future -- proves the undeniable role of Washington in the coup d'etat against President Zelaya in Honduras.

Eva Golinger
evagolinger@hotmail.com

http://www.chavezcode.com/2009/07/washington-coup-in-honduras-here-is.html
[i] http://wwwstate.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2009/july/125564.htm
[ii] http://wwwstate.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/06/125452.htm
[iii] See note 1.
[iv] http://www.state.gov/secretary/rm/2009a/july/125753.htm
[v] http://wwwradiomundial.com.ve/yvke/noticia.php?28366
[vi] http://www.elheraldo.hn/País/Ediciones/2009/06/05/Noticias/Lo-que-se-haga-debe-ser-legal-y-constitucional
[vii] www.arcadiafoundation.org
[viii] http://www.arcadiafoundation.org/videos.html
[ix] http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ukacM-77lXs .
[x] http://www.miamiherald.com/1506/story/1125872.html

Bury the Never Ending Myth of Michael Jackson as a Child Molester

Bury the Never Ending Myth of Jackson as Child Molester

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Websites, blogs and chatrooms pulsed with garish cracks about it. Legions of commentators and news reporters snuck it in every chance they got. More than a few of Michael Jackson’s fervent admirers and supporters made a dismissive reference to it. Even President Barack Obama in a cautious acknowledgement of Jackson’s towering contributions to American music and artistry still made reference to the “tragedy” in Jackson’s life which was a subtle nod to it. And New York Congressman Pete King skipped the niceties and flatly said it.

The “it” is the never ending myth of Jackson the child molester. It still hangs as a damning indictment that feeds the gossip mills and gives an arsenal of ammunition to Jackson detractors. This is not a small point. In the coming weeks, there will be a push to bestow official commemorative monuments, honors on and a national stamp for Jackson. The taint of scandal could doom these efforts to permanently memorialize Jackson.

The child molester myth doesn’t rest on Jackson’s trial and clean acquittal on multiple child abuse charges in a Santa Maria courthouse in June 2005. Only the most rabid Jackson loathers still finger point to that to taint Jackson. The myth of Jackson as child abuser rests squarely on the charge by a 13 year old boy a decade before the trial and the multi-million dollar settlement out of court. The settlement, then and now, feeds the suspicion that Jackson must have done something unsavory and probably criminal, or else why settle?

16 years later, though, the facts remain unchanged. The charge that Jackson molested the boy was brought by the boy’s father. In interviews the boy repeatedly denied the charges. This changed only after he was administered sodium amytal, an invasive, mind altering drug that medical experts have frowned on and courts have disregarded in witness testimony. Prosecutors, police departments and investigators in Los Angeles and Santa Barbara spent millions of dollars, convened two grand juries and probed nearly 200 witnesses that included 30 children, who knew Jackson to try to substantiate the charge. Not a single corroborating witness was found. Nonetheless, a motley group of disgruntled Jackson’s former housekeepers, attendants and bodyguards still peddled the story to any media outlet willing to shell out the cash that Jackson had engaged in child sexual wrongdoing. Not one of the charges was confirmed. Typical was this exchange between one of Jackson’s attorneys and one of the accusing bodyguards under oath:

“So you don’t know anything about Mr. Jackson and [the boy], do you?”

“All I know is from the sworn documents that other people have sworn to.”

“But other than what someone else may have said, you have no firsthand knowledge about Mr. Jackson and [the boy], do you?”

“That’s correct.”

“Have you spoken to a child who has ever told you that Mr. Jackson did anything improper with the child?”

“No.”

“Where did you get your impressions about Jackson’s behavior?”

“Just what I’ve been hearing in the media and what I’ve experienced with my own eyes.”

“Okay. That’s the point. You experienced nothing with your own eyes, did you?”

“That’s right, nothing.”

When asked at the time about the charges against Jackson, child behavior experts and psychiatrists nearly all agreed that he did not fit the profile of a pedophile. They agreed that the disorder is progressive and there are generally not one but a trail of victims.

The myth of Jackson as child molester never hinged on evidence or testimony to substantiate it, but solely on the settlement. Why then did Jackson agree to it?

No charge stirs more disgust, revulsion, and pricks more emotional hot buttons than the charge of child molestation. The accusation stamps the Scarlet letter of doubt, suspicion, shame and guilt on the accused. The accused can never fully expunge it. There is simply no defense against it. Under the hyper intense media glare and spotlight that Jackson remained under, the allegation no mater how bogus would have been endless fodder for the public gossip mill. This would have wreaked irreparable damage on Jackson’s ever shifting musical career and personal life.

A trial in Los Angeles in the racially charged backdrop of the Rodney King beating, the L.A. riots, and pulsating racial tensions in the mid-1990s would have been risky business. A trial in staid, upscale, and majority white, Santa Barbara County would have been even more risky.

Jackson and his attorneys knew that when it came to the charge of child molestation the presumption of innocence, or even actual innocence, is tossed out the window. Though Jackson did nothing wrong, a trial would have left him, his reputation and his career in shambles. The settlement was the only pragmatic, logical and legal way to end the sordid issue.

The settlement under extreme duress must not sully his name and place as an honored American icon. The myth of Jackson as child molester must finally be buried.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His weekly radio show, “The Hutchinson Report” can be heard on weekly in Los Angeles on KTYM Radio 1460 AM and nationally on blogtalkradio.com.

A Global Week of Solidarity With the Unemployed Surrounding the G20 Summit in Pittsburgh, September 20-25

A Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed

September 20- 25 (During the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh, PA)

Yes to Jobs & Human Needs; No to War & Wall Street Greed

Sunday, September 20 - Rally & March for a Real Jobs Program
Building a Tent City in Pittsburgh for the Unemployed & Supporters the weekend before the G-20 Summit
Organizing Caravans of Unemployed People and Supporters to Converge on Pittsburgh during the week of September 19-26
Marches, Protests and Events Before and During the G20 Summit addressing demands such as: Bring the Troops Home from Iraq & Afghanistan Now! & Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, World-Renown Political Prisoner, Journalist, Activists and 'Voice of the Voiceless!"

In September the eyes of the world will be on Pittsburgh, where the G20 countries will meet to consider what to do about the biggest global economic crisis since the 1930s. The heads of governments, finance ministers and central bankers that will be in Pittsburgh for the summit hear the concerns of bankers and corporate executives all the time. They need to listen to the voices of the millions of people who have lost their jobs and their homes because of the crisis. The Bail out the People Movement, a coalition of community, labor, religious, and grassroots activists, wants to help dramatize the crisis of joblessness, and the need for action both in the U.S. and worldwide to the G20 summit. It is now clear that the stimulus legislation passed by the U.S. Congress in March has done little to stop the loss of jobs. There is no recovery for the unemployed, the underemployed and the poor; and things are only getting worse. This is why we’re asking you to help make the idea of a Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed from September 19 through September 26, the week of the G20 Summit, a reality.

A TENT CITY AND MARCH FOR JOBS On Sunday, Sept. 20, the tent city will open with a rally and march for jobs. The main site for the tent city will be next to the Monumental Baptist Church in an historic section of the African-American community of Pittsburgh called “The Hill.” This location is just a short walk or march from the convention center where the G20 summit will be held, and from the rest of downtown Pittsburgh. Unemployed people and their supporters will inhabit the tent city from Sept 20 through Sept. 25. Additional locations for other encampments in Pittsburgh are being considered as well. This is why we’re asking you to help make the idea of a Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed from September 19 through September 26, the week of the G20 Summit, a reality.

IF YOU ARE STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE – THIS IS A WEEK OF SOLIDARITY WITH YOU The Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed is also a week of solidarity with those who have lost their homes to foreclosures and evictions; those who have been forced to take part-time or temporary jobs because there are no full-time jobs; workers who have seen their wages and hours cut; autoworkers whose plants have been closed; immigrant workers who are fighting for their rights; communities that are fighting gentrification and budget cuts to social programs; students who are being forced out of school because of the debt burden and rising tuition cost; the survivors and displaced victims of the Katrina/Rita hurricanes and the government's criminally negligent response; poor and working people everywhere, especially in poor countries who are bearing the cruel brunt of the economic crisis; workers everywhere fighting for the right to organize and in the U.S. for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act in the U.S.; All who need single payer health care; retirees who need their healthcare & pensions safeguarded; and young people, especially Black and Latina/o youths whom the system has condemned to a jobless future.

IT’S TIME TO BAILOUT THE UNEMPLOYED WITH A REAL JOBS PROGRAM In the days before and during the G20 summit, events and marches will take place to emphasize this central point: More than just another stimulus package is needed. It’s time for a serious, direct and massive jobs program on par with the Works Progress Administration of the 1930s. We must fight for a real jobs program for the unemployed and underemployed that pays a living wage performing socially meaningful work; and an income for those unable to work. Any claim that the resources for a serious jobs program are not available must be rejected. If governments, particularly the U.S. government, can make available trillions of dollars for bailing out banks and corporations as well as funding the Pentagon’s endless wars, & Occupations, they can find the resources to bail out the unemployed and underemployed.

THIS IS A GLOBAL CALL BECAUSE JOBLESSNESS IS A GLOBAL CRISIS Mass unemployment is a global phenomenon. The right to a job at a living wage must be a global demand. Instead of being pitted against each other, unemployed and working people across the world can only improve their conditions by working and fighting together for their common interests. Activists and organizations everywhere are encouraged to support the Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed and organize events in conjunction with it.

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING'S FINAL CAUSE: THE RIGHT OF ALL TO A JOB OR AN INCOME The need and the right of everyone to either a job or a guaranteed income is the cause that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. dedicated the last year of his life to. The present global economic depression has made King’s last cause even more urgent today than it was when he was alive. Dr. King also knew that: no matter the magnitude of suffering, governments do not respond if those who are suffering remain invisible and silent. Even a history-making president like Obama is still not a substitute for the mass movement for social justice. During the depression of the 1930’s, President Franklyn Delano Roosevelt once told labor leaders who were asking him to do more to help workers and the poor “I agree with you, now make me do it”. FDR’s advice applies to President Obama too. The purpose of the Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed is to make sure that people who are usually ignored are seen and heard.

ORGANIZING CARAVANS OF UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE AND SUPPORTERS TO PITTSBURGH Over the next 10 weeks, organizing will be going on in every region of the country to bring caravans of unemployed people and supporters to Pittsburgh in Sept.

THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP:

Have your Union/Community/Religious or Student Organization.endorse - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20endorse.shtml
Donate to help with organizing expenses - http://bailoutpeople.org/donate.shtml
Organize car/s vans/ trucks & buses from your locality to participate in the caravans to Pittsburgh - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20volorgcents.shtml
Have an Organizer address a meeting of your organization - http://bailoutpeople.org/cmnt.shtml
Volunteer your time to work on this project - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20volorgcents.shtml

Congo-Brazzaville Leader Swepts to Power Again

Congo-Brazzaville Leader Swepts to Power Again

By Laudes Martial Mbon
July 16, 2009 03:42am

DENIS Sassou Nguesso, who has ruled Congo with an iron fist for nearly a quarter of a century, swept back into power with 78.61 per cent of the votes, official figures showed.

Sassou Nguesso won 1,055,117 votes in an election Sunday where the turnout was 66.42 per cent, according to provisional figures read out by Territorial Administration Minister Raymond Mboulou.

The former military ruler was officially said easily to have beaten 12 other candidates, six of whom had asked for a boycott of the poll on the grounds that it would be rigged. The opposition also contests the turnout.

Former finance minister Mathias Dzon of the Alliance for Democracy and the Republic, considered to be Sassou Nguesso's main rival, took 2.30 per cent of the votes, the provisional official figures said.

Joseph Kignoumbi Kia Mboungou, an independent candidate, came in second place with 7.46 per cent, and beat Nicephore Fylla de Saint-Eudes of the Liberal Republican Party, who got 6.98 per cent.

But the opposition has widely criticised the conduct of the whole poll by the government ministry and by the electoral commission, which they accuse of being a tool of the regime.

Small teams of monitors from the African Union and the 10-nation Economic Community of Central African States said this year's poll "took place in a calm and serene atmosphere".

However the Congolese Observatory of Human Rights, a non-governmental organisation, said the poll was "neither fair, nor transparent, nor balanced" and had been marked by a "very weak" turnout.

Sassou Nguesso, 66, is one of Africa's long-serving leaders having first come to power three decades ago.

His first stint as president of the former French colony stretched from 1979 to 1992 and he returned to the presidency in 1997 after a civil war.

Sassou Nguesso was re-elected in 2002 in a vote that international observers said fell short of democratic standards.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Africa and the G8 in Italy: Broken Promises and Worsening Poverty

Africa and the G8 in Italy: Broken Promises and Worsening Poverty

Imperialist states continue to place blame on the continent for economic woes

by Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire
Commentary

This year's Group of 8 Summit in L'Aquila, Italy once again demonstrated the failure of capitalist economic policies to bring genuine development to the African continent. Even though the final day of the summit involved dialogue around industrialized states providing aid to Africa for agricultural programs, the fact that previous pledges of $50 billion made at the 2005 meeting in Gleneagles, Scotland have not been met, made African leaders even more sceptical about the role of Europe and the United States in the future of the continent.

With the current economic crisis having a devastating impact on African states, the continuation of the status-quo will widen further the income gap between the western capitalist states and the countries who have emerged from colonial and semi-colonial rule. The declining standard of living and increasing poverty rate in Africa will result in more job losses, greater food insecurity and social instability.

ActionAid spokesperson Meredith Alexander said of the L'Aquila Summit that: "Although the G8 leaders reaffirmed their Gleneagles promises this week, their own accountability report does not even acknowledge how far off track they are. This suggests that the Gleneagles promises are increasingly unlikely to be met. It is another failure for the world's poor." (Independent, July 11)

Alexander pointed out that the G8 leaders stated they will report next year on progress toward meeting the objectives of the United Milennium Development Goals set for 2015 to significantly reduce poverty throughout the world, but this approach is merely designed for "moving the goalposts" since the previous promises will not be realized.

United Nations figures indicate that the number of people who are malnourished around the world has risen since 2007 and by the conclusion of 2009, the number is expected to reach an estimated total of 1.02 billion, which will reverse the declines seen since the 1960s. Consequently, the world economic crisis is effectively eliminating the limited progress made since the triumphs of the national independence movements during the 1960s and 1970s.

Jeremy Hobbs of the British-based aid organization Oxfam said of the G8 Summit that: "For Obama it was 'yes we can.' For Berlusconi's G8, it's 'no we won't. This summit has been a shambles, it did nothing for Africa, and the world is still being cooked. Canada 2010 [the next G8 meeting] is the end of the road for the G8--all the promises they have made are due. They have 12 short months to avoid being remembered as the ones who let the poor and the planet die."(Independent, July 11)

Joanne Green of the Catholic Agency for Overseas Development did welcome the pledge made toward agricultural assistance by the G8 but went on to say that any new offers should be granted in addition to the existing committments already made from the Gleneagles Summit in 2005. She also stressed the need for aid to go directly to the African farmers and not to agribusiness companies.

"Tonight one billion people will go to bed hungry because the food system that rich countries have created isn't working. Climate change will only increase the vulnerability of poor people as land and water are degraded. Supporting small-scale farmers is vital, so that they are less reliant on the peaks and troughs of the global food market and the multinational players who dominate, Green said." (Independent, July 11)

Robert Fox, the executive director of Oxfam Canada said in a blog on July 8 that "Performance on aid varies greatly among G8 members but together they fall $23 billion short of the target they set in 2005. The result? At least three million lives have been lost--women who die needlessly in childbirth; children who fall victim to preventable diseases; persons with AIDS who lives are cut short because they could not get treatment." (All-Africa.com, July 8)

Fox continues by pointing out that "Journalists also complain it's difficult to sift through the G8 commitments to see which are real and which are spin; what is new or additional money and what is recycling a previous unmet promise. The devil is in the details and reporters need to dig to find out if there's any substance behind the rhetoric."

The Crisis in Capitalism and Its Impact on Women

The declining economic and social conditions in Africa and other so-called developing countries will inevitably have a damaging impact on efforts aimed at achieving gender equality. If there is an increase in assistance for agricultural production, it is necessary to ensure that the bulk of resources allocated go directly to women. In many African countries, women are responsible for 80% or more of the production of food.

Sabina Zaccaro, in an article published by the Inter Press Service Agency states that "The problem is funding. According to the World Bank, the economic crisis and the new rise in food prices could lead to 2.8 million more children dying by 2015 if no concrete action is taken. Sixty billion dollars are needed over the next five years to fight infectious diseases and strengthen health systems in the developing world." (IPS, July 8)

Consequently, if there is no direct attention paid to the plight of women and children in the current crisis in global capitalism, there will be more people driven into poverty through shrinking incomes, increases in infant mortality, malnutrition and the decline in labor productivity.

Obama's Message in Ghana Places Blame on the Victims of Neo-colonialism

In the aftermath of the G8 Summit in Italy, U.S. President Barack Obama flew to the west African state of Ghana for an official visit. Media pundits proclaimed that this was his first trip to Africa since taking office, yet his speech in Cairo, Egypt recently was totally overlooked.

These corporate media statements reveal the ongoing racist notions of two Africas, one north of the sahara and so-called sub-saharan Africa. These colonial created divsions and categories have been rejected by the progressive forces on the continent. The African Union (AU) despite all of its challenges, did hold serious discussions at its summit in Libya between July 1-3 around creating greater economic, political and military cooperation on the continent.

Obama's visit to Ghana was well received by both the government and the people. The symbolic return home of the first president of African descent of the United States was well taken. Nonetheless, the substance of Obama's message did not represent a real departure from the traditional post-independence approach to United States foreign policy towards Africa.

The bulk of Obama's remarks criticized corruption and inefficiency on the part of African states with implications that these problems were the root causes of poverty and underdevelopment. Yet very little reference was made to the legacies of slavery, colonialism and neo-colonialism as the real source of underdevelopment among various African states.

The president visited the slave castle at Cape Coast where he reflected on the tragedy of the Atlantic slave trade which went on for four centuries. However, in his address before the Ghana parliament, he stated that although colonialism created division and conflict on the continent, this could no longer be viewed as a major impediment to African progress.

Obama's remark that "the economic problems in Zimbabwe could not be blamed on the west," a statement that received a cool response from parliamentarians, totally missed the mark in regard to the ongoing unequal relations that continue to exist between former colonial states and the imperialist countries. In Zimbabwe, the revolutionary African National Union, Patriotic Front and the western-backed Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) factions have formed an inclusive government, yet the United States and the United Kingdom continues to maintain economic sanctions.

Although Ghana was praised for its ostensible progress related to the notions of "good governance", this state, which achieved national independence from Britain in 1957, fell victim to U.S. imperialist intervention after President Kwame Nkrumah sought to place pan-africanism and socialism as the principle objectives of the nation's domestic and foreign policy. The coup against Nkrumah in 1966 was financed and engineered by U.S. imperialism through the State Department and the Central Intelligence Agency.

Since 1966, the International Monetary Fund and World Bank have sought to remake Ghana in the image of the west. Consequently, it is not surprising that the Obama administration selected this country for the president to visit as opposed to other states such as Sudan and Zimbabwe which have taken a more independent line towards the U.S.

In placing the majority of blame for economic and social problems in Africa on the governments and people themselves, it provides a rationale for the failure of the G8 in regard to honoring its commitments to provide development assistance to the continent.

An article published in the Malaysian Star by Martin Khor took up this issue of "good governance" as a prerequisite to economic development. Khor says that "President Obama compared Kenya to South Korea, saying that both countries once had the same per capita income but Kenya remains poor while South Korea had become an economic powerhouse.

"The implication of all this is that East Asian countries like South Korea did well because they had good governance and democracy while African countries have lagged behind because of undemocratic practices and bad policies. The assumption of the G8 Summit, and of President Obama, are correct only to a limited degree--South Korea's development, for example, took off while the country was under dictatorship."

Khor continues by pointing out that "Of course governance and good policies are crucial elements. But any comparison between the developments in Africa and East Asia must take into account that most African countries were unfortunate enough to come under the influence of World Bank and IMF conditionalities, whereas most East Asian countries did not and were free to adopt their own policies.

"The decline in agriculture in many African countries was due to the structural adjustment policies of the IMF and World Bank. These countries were asked or advised to dismantle marketing boards and guaranteed prices for farmers' products; phase out or eliminate subsidies and support such as fertiliser, machines, agricultural infrastructure, and reduce tariffs of food products to very low levels," Khor continued. (The Star, July 13)

Consequently, the rhetoric of Obama is not fundamentally different than what has been advanced through successive U.S. administrations. What is needed is an independent domestic and foreign policy based on the needs of African people themselves, and not the policy imperatives of the U.S. and European imperialists.

From the G8 to the G20 in Pittsburgh

Plans are now underway for the convening of the G20 Summit in Pittsburgh in September 2009. The G20 represents the attempt by the imperialists to broaden the discussions around economic issues to involve not only the so-called High Income Countries (HICs) but to also engage other states such as China, Brazil, South Africa, etc., which are former colonial and semi-colonial states that have experienced economic development resulting from the evolving international division of labor and economic power.

The fact that the High Income Countries are facing grave economic difficulties provides openings for workers and the oppressed in both the developed and developing regions to open up dialogue and plan joint efforts to tackle the main forces behind the crisis in capitalist globalization. Anti-imperialists, social justice advocates and other mass organizations are mobilizing to come to Pittsburgh in order to advance an alternative agenda that places the workers, nationally oppressed and women at the center of any development program.

Efforts must be made to involve broad forces in the demonstrations surrounding the G20 Summit. Special appeals should be made to the African-American, Latino/a, Asian-American, LGBT communities and other oppressed groups to attend and participate fully in the resistance efforts.

Rank and file workers should be encouraged to come to Pittsburgh and to put forward an agenda that transcends and refutes the failed "buy American" sloganeering that has lead nowhere in regard to preserving workers' jobs and homes in the United States. It is only when the workers and oppressed in the United States recognize the common interests they have with the plight of the peoples of the developing world that a real international movement can be built that will effectively end capitalism and imperialism and create the conditions for socialism on a worldwide scale.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Helicopter Downed by Afghanistan Resistance Forces; Deaths of "Civilian Contractors" Reported

Tuesday, July 14, 2009
16:14 Mecca time, 13:14 GMT

Deaths in Afghan helicopter crash

Thousands of US soldiers backed by Nato and Afghan forces are seeking to root out the Taliban

A military helicopter carrying civilian contractors has been shot down in the southern Afghan province of Helmand, resulting in six deaths, Nato officials say.

The Taliban said it had shot down a Chinook helicopter in the province's Sangin district.

"At around 9am (0430 GMT) this morning, a private helicopter crashed outside Sangin military base ... we have at least six people killed," a spokesman for the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf) said on Tuesday.

"The passengers were all civilians."

Officials earlier told Al Jazeera that "possibly more than two" passengers were killed in the crash.

Fazlul Haq, the district chief of Sangin, said he saw the helicopter before it crashed.

"We are aware of an incident involving a non-British military helicopter in Helmand province," Lieutenant-Colonel Nick Richardson of the Nato-led force told the Reuters news agency by phone from Helmand.

A spokeswoman for the US navy, Lieutenant-Commander Christine Sidenstricker, also acknowledged there had been some casualties.

Helmand is the site of an offensive by around 4,000 US soldiers backed by hundreds of Nato and Afghan forces aimed at driving out the Taliban.

It is part of the main bastion for Taliban fighters and is the main drug-producing region of Afghanistan.

The US-led operation is the biggest by foreign troops since they removed the Taliban from power in 2001.

Crucial elections

The offensive comes in advance of next month's presidential election, which is crucial both for Kabul and for a US administration that has identified Afghanistan and neighbouring Pakistan as its top foreign policy priority.

Zeina Khodr, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Kabul, said: "Security is proving to be a major challenge in the upcoming presidential elections.

"According to the interior ministry, 134 out of 364 districts in the country are deemed unsafe."

"There are more than 28,000 polling stations across Afghanistan, and according to the free and fair election foundation here, 30 per cent of those polling stations will not be secured."

Bloodiest month

Taliban fighters have stepped up their attacks in different parts of Afghanistan against foreign soldiers and the government, making July the bloodiest month for foreign troops for nearly a year.

Two US soldiers from the Isaf were killed on Monday in Helmand, a spokesman for the US military said.

Prior to that, at least 15 foreign soldiers had been killed since the start of the assault in Helmand.

Last week, three foreign soldiers were killed when a Nato helicopter crashed in the southern Zabul province.

Several dozen Taliban fighters have also been killed in Helmand, according to the Afghan government, but there has been no major engagement with the fighters there.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Former Liberian President Charles Taylor Takes the Stand at the Hague

Liberia's Taylor takes the stand

18:53, Tuesday July 14, 2009

Three years after his arrest and two years after his war crimes trial began, Charles Taylor has taken the stand.

The first African head of state to be tried by an international court is charged with 11 counts of murder, torture, rape, sexual slavery, using child soldiers and spreading terror.

Prosecutors at the UN-backed court say he backed Sierra Leone rebels to help gain control of the neighbouring country and strip it of its vast mineral wealth.

Some of the 91 witnesses called so far have claimed Taylor shipped weapons to rebels in rice sacks in contravention of an arms embargo and in return got so-called 'blood diamonds' mined by slave labour.

Taylor, 61, has pleaded innocent.

His attorney Courtenay Griffiths said that on Tuesday the former leader would begin what is expected to be several weeks of testimony at the Special Court for Sierra Leone because he wanted to set the record straight.

Griffiths said Taylor will testify about his 'strenuous efforts to bring peace in Sierra Leone'.

He urged the judges to give Taylor a fair hearing, and not to be overwhelmed by the parade of misery presented by the prosecution since the trial opened 18 months ago.

One prosecution witness took the stand with stumps where his hands had been hacked off.

A woman testified that she was forced to carry a sack full of severed heads including those of her children.

One of Taylor's former aides told judges he was with Taylor when the president ate a human liver.

'No one who has seen the procession through this courtroom of hurt human beings reliving the most grotesque trauma would have been unmoved,' Griffiths, who is from Britain, told the three-judge panel.

'We are human too, even while we declare this accused man to be not guilty of the charges he faces.'

Taylor's trial has been hailed as a groundbreaking example of making an autocrat face responsibility for the human rights violations that occurred on his watch.

Sudan's president, Omar al-Bashir, has refused to answer a summons by the International Criminal Court, which is based in The Hague, to respond to charges of crimes against humanity in Darfur.

Most African leaders have supported al-Bashir in his defiance and refuse to arrest him.

Taylor completed an economics degree in the United States and military training in Libya before rising to power as a rebel warlord in Liberia and being elected president in 1997.

He is accused of supporting the Revolutionary United Front in Sierra Leone, supporting its fight to depose President Joseph Momoh and his successors. Prosecutors say Taylor trained in Libya with the RUF's leader, Foday Sankoh.

About 500,000 people are estimated to have been victims of killings, systematic mutilation and other atrocities in the civil war that lasted until 2002.

Some of the worst crimes were carried out by gangs of child soldiers, who were fed drugs to desensitise them to the horror of their actions.

In an emotional opening statement, Griffiths cast Taylor as a peacemaker who was too busy defending democracy in Liberia to 'micro manage' atrocities committed by rebels during the 1991-2002 civil war in Sierra Leone.

Griffiths said Taylor was not behind the use of children in conflict.

'Child soldiers were not a Charles Taylor invention,' he said.

The former president sat impassively in court wearing a brown double-breasted suit, brown tie and dark glasses.

Since his arrest in 2003, Taylor 'has not said a word in his own defence ... ,' Griffiths said.

'Now he takes the opportunity to put forward his defence, not because in law he has to, but because he feels it is important to set the historical record straight.'

Taylor is being tried in a courtroom rented from the International Criminal Court in The Hague because of fears that trying him in Sierra Leone could spark renewed violence.


Taylor labels Hague case 'lies'

Ex-Liberian President Charles Taylor has dismissed as "lies" the war crimes case against him, as he took the stand for the first time at The Hague.

He denies 11 counts including terrorism, murder, rape and torture, at the Special Court for Sierra Leone.

The 61-year-old is accused of having armed and directed rebel groups from Liberia in order to seize control of Sierra Leone's diamond riches.

Mr Taylor is the first African leader to be tried by an international court.

"It is very, very, very unfortunate that the prosecution, because of disinformation, misinformation, lies, rumours would associate me with such titles or descriptions," he told the packed courtroom.

'Love for humanity'

He denied claims he was involved in atrocities committed by Revolutionary United Front (RUF) rebels during Sierra Leone's 1991-2002 civil war.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHARLES TAYLOR CHARGES
Violation of humanitarian law: Conscripting child soldiers
Crimes against humanity: Terrorising civilians, murder, rape, sexual slavery, enslavement
War crimes: Violence to life and cruel treatment (including hacking off limbs) pillage
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Taking the stand for the first time in his two-year trial, he said he had only wanted to bring peace to Sierra Leone.

Mr Taylor, whose testimony is expected to last several weeks, continued: "I am a father of 14 children, grandchildren, with love for humanity, have fought all my life to do what I thought was right in the interests of justice and fair play."

Wearing a dark suit and tinted spectacles, he told his lawyer, Courtenay Griffiths, that the charges were "false" and "malicious".

Mr Taylor denied providing military assistance to the rebels - who were notorious for using machetes to hack the limbs off civilians - or having plotted to invade Sierra Leone with RUF leader Foday Sankoh.

'Diamond-filled jars'

He also denied having been given coffee jars full of blood diamonds by the RUF.

"Never, ever, did I receive whether it is mayonnaise or coffee or whatever jar, never received any diamonds from the RUF. It's a lie, it's a diabolical lie. Never," he said.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TAYLOR TIMELINE
1989 Launches rebellion in Liberia
1991 RUF rebellion starts in Sierra Leone
1995 Peace deal signed
1997 Elected president
1999 Liberia's Lurd rebels start insurrection to oust Taylor
June 2003 Arrest warrant issued
August 2003 Steps down, goes into exile in Nigeria
March 2006 Arrested, sent to Sierra Leone
June 2007 Trial opens at Hague
Mr Taylor's legal team began setting out its case on Monday. He is the first of 249 witnesses the defence has said it may call to the stand.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
His lawyers say Mr Taylor could not have micro-managed a rebel operation in Sierra Leone while also running affairs of state in Liberia.

The prosecution called 91 witnesses, many of whom provided graphic testimony of amputations, murder of children and cannibalism, before wrapping up its case in February.

Mr Taylor started a civil war in Liberia 1989, before being elected president there in 1997. He was himself overthrown by a rebellion and went into exile in 2003.

After a spell in Nigeria, he was eventually extradited from Liberia in 2006.

The trial at the UN-backed Special Court for Sierra Leone was moved to the Netherlands from Sierra Leone's capital, Freetown, amid fears it could create instability in the country and neighbouring Liberia.

A verdict in the case is expected some time next year.

Were you affected by the civil war in Sierra Leone? If you are willing to speak to the BBC News website about your experiences, please get in touch using the postform below. Your contact details will not be published.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8148993.stm
Published: 2009/07/14 10:07:24 GMT

San Francisco 8 Update: The Final Comment From Political Prisoner Herman Bell

THE FINAL COMMENT ON THE SF8

BY HERMAN BELL - 11 July 2009

It has been said, though unmaliciously, that I pled in the SF8 case because I am ill and have to get out of the county jail and back to New York for medical treatment. Although I’ve been confined in a tank with psychotic individuals more often than not, who often yell and scream 24 7 for days without stopping (oh yeah!), and I’ve not been in fresh air and sunshine the whole two + years I’ve been here, I still can say unequivocally that my health is reasonably okay.

Let there be absolutely no misunderstanding about this plea I took. The SF8 case was complex, and not everyone in the case had the same legal issues. Because of this, I took a plea because I believed it was the right thing to do for me and the case itself. And this could well make my parole chances in New York even more difficult. Still, the plea was well worth taking because it led to Jalil Muntaqim’s plea, which resulted in charges being dismissed against: Hank Jones, Ray Boudreaux, Harold Taylor, and Richard Brown – but unfortunately, not Francisco Torres.

There is hope still that charges against Cisco will be dismissed, and if he should go to trial, we support him. The SF8 comradeship remains unbreakable. I say unequivocally that, individually or collectively, we would never dishonor ourselves or you by doing something so unconscionable as to undermine the interests of our historic struggle.

Thus, I regard the outcome of this case as a People’s victory, as one made all the sweeter by the hard work our supporters and legal team put in to make it so. So we thank our lawyers and investigators for the excellent work and dedication that they devoted to our defense: Soffiyah Elijah, Heather Hardwick, Rai Sue Sussman, Julie de Almeida, Jenny Kang, Mark Rosenbush, Lori Flowers, and our investigators: Adam Raskin, Nancy Pemberton, Patricia de Larios, and Keith MacArthur – you guys are pros.

Special thanks and gratitude to my lawyer, Stuart Hanlon, for the sleepless nights and long hours he devoted to this case (lest you all have forgotten, Stuart also fought for over 20 years to free Geronimo Pratt); we were fortunate to have Stuart on our legal team. In addition to my excellent representation, initially in 2005 when this case was at the beginning grand jury stages, Stuart assembled the very finest criminal defense lawyers in the Bay Area to represent the SF8 on a volunteer basis before the grand jury.

These lawyers then went on to represent us once a grand jury indictment failed and the Attorney General filed the criminal complaint against us. I think Stuart is one of the finest lawyers in the country. Yet, my praise and appreciation is in no way to disparage the quality of service and dedicated commitment the other lawyers on our team devoted to our defense: Daro Inouye, Mark Goldrosen, Chuck Bourdon, Mike Burt, Randy Montesano, John Philipsborn, and Richard Mazer – big ups to you all. Also, very big thanks to Dennis Cunningham, Che Hashim, and Kelly Metters for volunteering to facilitate Jalil’s and my weekly Saturday legal visits for the past two years when our legal team was unavailable.

Finally, my profound gratitude to all our friends and supporters. – Herman
_______________________________________________
Please support these brothers by sending a donation. Make checks payable to CDHR/Agape and mail to the address below or donate on line:

http://www.freethesf8.org/donate.html

Committee for the Defense of Human Rights (CDHR)
PO Box 90221
Pasadena, CA 91109
(415) 226-1120
FreetheSF8@riseup.net
http://www.freethesf8.org

Free the San Francisco Eight!

Committee for the Defense of Human Rights

Charges against four more dropped; Jalil Muntaqim and Herman Bell plead no contest/guilty to reduced charge of conspiracy/manslaughter – no prison sentence – see blog at http://freethesf8.blogspot.com for details.

See photos at www.flickr.com/photos/freethesf8.

After 38 years, the government's case against eight former Black Panther Party members and supporters has almost completely unraveled. The eight were arrested January 23, 2007 in California, New York, and Florida on charges related to the 1971 killing of a San Francisco police officer. Similar charges were brought in 1975, but a California judge tossed out the charges, finding that they were based on statements made by three of the men after police in New Orleans tortured them for several days employing electric shock, cattle prods, beatings, sensory deprivation, plastic bags and hot, wet blankets for asphyxiation.

Last week, Herman Bell and Jalil Muntaqim were sentenced to probation and time served, after Herman agreed to plead to voluntary manslaughter and Jalil to conspiracy to voluntary manslaughter. All charges were then dropped on Richard Brown, Hank Jones, Harold Taylor, and Ray Boudreaux, with the prosecution admitting it had “insufficient evidence” against them. Charges had already been dropped against Richard O'Neal last year.

Francisco Torres, of NYC, is the last person still with charges; he maintains his innocence and will appear in court on August 10. (See profiles on Who Are the SF 8?).

Herman Bell and Jalil Muntaqim have been in prison in New York for almost 40 years on similar charges based on the US Government's COINTELPRO actions to disrupt and destroy radical organizations, especially the Black Panther Party. Showing the weakness of the prosecution's case, Bell and Muntaqim were given no additional prison time, and will be returned to NY where they will continue to fight for parole.

Two and a half years of mass support for the Brothers, including resolutions from the San Francisco Central Labor Council, the Berkeley City Council, and several San Francisco Supervisors, have almost broken the back of a vindictive prosecution organized by Homeland Security, the FBI, and California Attorney General Jerry Brown. The defense committee has vowed to keep up the pressure until charges are dropped against Francisco Torres and Herman and Jalil are back with their families and community.

See also reports in IndyBay Media and the SF Bay Guardian and photos at www.flickr.com/photos/freethesf8.

Background: Murder Charges Against Former Black Panthers Based on Confessions Extracted by Torture

Eight former Black community activists – Black Panthers and others – were arrested January 23, 2007 in California, New York, and Florida on charges related to the 1971 killing of a San Francisco police officer. Similar charges were thrown out after it was revealed that police used torture to extract confessions when some of these same men were arrested in New Orleans in 1973.

Richard Brown, Richard O'Neal, Ray Boudreaux, and Hank Jones were arrested in California. Francisco Torres was arrested in Queens, New York. Harold Taylor was arrested in Florida. Two men charged – Herman Bell and Jalil Muntaqim – have been held as political prisoners for over 30 years in New York State prisons. The men were charged with the murder of Sgt. John Young and conspiracy that encompasses numerous acts between 1968 and 1973.

Harold Taylor and John Bowman (recently deceased) as well as Ruben Scott (thought to be a government witness) were first charged in 1975. But a judge tossed out the charges, finding that Taylor and his two co-defendants made statements after police in New Orleans tortured them for several days employing electric shock, cattle prods, beatings, sensory deprivation, plastic bags and hot, wet blankets for asphyxiation. Such "evidence" is neither credible nor legal.

Support the Defendants

Learn more. Join the e-mail list. Write the defendants. Donate. See their Joint Statement. Distribute flyers. Sign the open letter to the California Attorney General. Host a house party. Organize a video showing. Come to court. Details on these activities and more on our "What You Can Do" page.

Committee for the Defense of Human Rights
P.O. Box 90221
Pasadena, CA 91109
(415) 226-1120
E-mail: freethesf8@riseup.net

Anglo American Appoints Another White Chairman in South Africa

JOHANNESBURG 10 July 2009 Sapa

ANGLO AMERICAN APPOINTS PARKER AS CHAIRMAN

Sir John Parker has been appointed Anglo American's new chairman
in spite of a strong recommendation by the government that a black
candidate be appointed, the company said on Friday.

"Sir John will join the Board of Anglo American plc as a
non-executive director with immediate effect and will become
chairman on 1 August, succeeding Sir Mark Moody-Stuart, who will be retiring from the Board after seven years as chairman," the company said in a statement.

Parker is chairman of National Grid plc and is also joint
chairman of the Mondi Group with Cyril Ramaphosa.

On Thursday, however, Mineral Resources Minister Susan Shabangu
said Anglo American should appoint a black South African as
chairman.

"It should come as no surprise that we feel strongly about this
issue," she told Sapa via email.

"Anglo American has its roots in South Africa and its role in
the South African economy is very significant."

She sad the government had been actively pursuing the
transformation of the country in every aspect "and therefore we
would prefer to have a black South African as the chairperson of
Anglo".

The minister said this would be "a positive signal going
forward" that Anglo was committed to South Africa, to the
transformation of its economy and the development of the country.

However, Anglo appointed Parker who would step down from several
of his board and other commitments. He has recently stepped down as chair of the Court of the Bank of England, the statement said.

"Anglo American's Board appointed a search committee of
independent directors chaired by Peter Woicke, former CEO of the
International Finance Corporation, with members Dr Mamphela
Ramphele, former Vice Chancellor of the University of Cape Town
and former managing director of the World Bank, Sir CK Chow, chief
executive of the Hong Kong MTR, and the late Karel van Miert,
former European Commissioner and member of the European
Parliament," the company stated.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Guinea on Alert For 'Attack Plot'

Guinea on alert for 'attack plot'

The military government of Guinea says it has put the army on high alert at all border posts after uncovering plans for an attack on the country.

The West African state said armed men were gathering on the borders with Guinea-Bissau and Senegal to the north and Liberia to the south.

An announcement on state-run national radio said drugs cartels were believed to be behind the plans.

Guinea is a key transit point for drugs en route from the Americas to Europe.

When the junta led by Captain Moussa Camara seized power some seven months ago, it made the fight against drugs one of its key priorities.

Several leading suspects have been arrested and are awaiting trial, but the regime must have made powerful enemies in the process, correspondents say.

The BBC's Alhassan Sillah in the capital, Conakry, says the announcement of the national alert caught most people off guard and many have reacted with trepidation.

The statement, carried on state radio said "well informed sources" had indicated that the attackers were on the payroll of drug cartels.

"The ministry of defence was informed by the security services and other credible sources of the preparation of an armed attack on Guinea from its borders with Guinea-Bissau and the region of Casamance [in Senegal]," it said.

"These sources have also indicated that there are armed men regrouping on the border with Guinea Bissau to the north and the town of Foya to the south on the border with Liberia."

The BBC's John James in neighbouring Ivory Coast says there is no independent confirmation of the reality of any threat along Guinea's borders.

There are large numbers of small arms in circulation in the region, while along the border with Senegal there is a low-level insurgency by rebels hoping for the Casamance region to break away from Dakar, he adds.

Election pressure

The statement comes as the military government faces increasing pressure from both local political and civil society groups and the international community for it to hold elections.

Captain Camara has said he will stand down after free and fair elections, which he says will take place by the end of 2009.

The African Union suspended Guinea after the coup, which followed the death of long-standing President Lansana Conte. Many Guineans welcomed the coup, seeing it as bringing an end to years of misrule.

Guinea has more than a third of the world's bauxite reserves, and also has large reserves of gold, diamonds, iron and nickel.

COCAINE TRAFFICKING ROUTES INTO EUROPE VIA WEST AFRICA

1. Most of the world's supply of cocaine comes from South America. Venezuela is one of the main departure points for illicit drug consignments leaving the region. Drugs are flown or shipped to West Africa in shipping containers, small boats, or private and commercial aircraft .

2. West Africa has become a major hub for smuggling South American cocaine into Europe as British and American anti-drug efforts have curtailed the use of traditional smuggling routes.

3. In West Africa the drugs are stockpiled and prepared for transport into Europe by South American, European and local drugs gangs.

4. The drugs are smuggled to Europe by shipping container, overland, airfreight or on commercial passenger flights using "mules" via West and East Africa.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8146398.stm
Published: 2009/07/12 09:41:04 GMT

Nigeria Releases Key Rebel Leader in Amnesty Deal

Nigeria releases key rebel leader

One of Nigeria's main rebel leaders, Henry Okah, has been freed from jail as part of a government amnesty.

Mr Okah had been held for more than a year on charges of treason.

He was said to be one of the heads of the Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (Mend), but on leaving jail denied he was the leader.

Mend claims to be fighting for a fairer distribution of Nigeria's oil wealth. The release came hours after it launched a deadly attack in Lagos.

Mr Okah was arrested in Angola in 2007 and charged with treason and gun-running charges.

His release has been a key demand of his group.

At a hearing in the central city of Jos, Judge Mohammed Liman told Mr Okah he was discharged.

"Having reviewed what the attorney general said, you have become a free man at this moment," said the judge.

On his release, Mr Okah said he would hold consultations with the rest of the group.

In a bid to end years of rebel attacks on the oil industry, the government offered militants an amnesty three weeks ago.

Officials said any rebel willing to give up their weapons by October would benefit from a rehabilitation programme, including education and training opportunities.

But Mend leaders said they would reject the amnesty - and have since claimed responsibility for several attacks including one earlier in Lagos, away from its usual area of operation in the Nigeria Delta.

The government's critics say the amnesty is unlikely to work because the unrest is not a straightforward political struggle but involves economic and land rights.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8148535.stm
Published: 2009/07/13 16:08:34 GMT

Nigeria: MEND Takes Oil War Into Lagos

Nigerian rebels take 'oil war' into Lagos

(AFP) - - Nigerian rebels have taken their battle with the government into the country's main city, targetting an oil tanker loading facility in Lagos harbour in an unprecedented attack on the metropolis.

The Movement for the Emancipation of the Niger Delta (MEND) said the attack had left the facility in flames after the sound of an explosion just before midnight on Sunday reverberated across the city of 16 million people.

The government later confirmed the attack which came hours before treason charges against one of MEND's senior leaders were expected to be dropped as part of an amnesty deal.

The MEND campaign against Nigeria's main oil facilities over the past three years have badly hit much needed oil revenues.

MEND said its fighters carried out the "unprecedented attack" on the Atlas Cove Jetty in Lagos harbour on Sunday night. It said in a statement that the "depot and loading tankers moored at the facility are currently on fire".

"We encountered some slight resistance from the Nigerian navy guarding the facility but they were easily over-powered. Over nine may have been injured or killed," said MEND.

Military, police and government spokesmen all confirmed the attack.

"We are aware of the attack on the Atlas Cove Jetty but the details are still sketchy. But we must say that the MEND has exaggerated in its statement," a naval spokesman, Captain Henry Babalola, told AFP.

"We have heard of the attack but we are trying to get facts surrounding it," Lagos State police spokesman, Frank Mba said.

The government has been trying to blunt the rebel campaign with an amnesty deal and treason charges against a top MEND leader, Henry Okah, are expected to be dropped at a court hearing on Monday.

Lawyers for Okah and top government officials agreed on the hearing at a meeting Sunday, Okah's lawyer Femi Falana told AFP.

Okah has detained in September 2007 for gun-running and faces treason charges. His release has been one of the rebels' main demands.

President Umaru Yar'Adua on June 25 declared an unconditional pardon for militants in the Niger Delta, if they "surrender their weapons and renounce militancy." The amnesty offer is vailed until October 4.

Violence in the southern region of the world's eight largest oil exporter has cut output by more than 30 percent over the past three-and-a-half years.

Apart from attacks on oil installations in the Niger Delta, hundreds of oil workers -- foreign and local -- have been kidnapped. Some were held for several months.

The rebels launched their "oil war" in the swamps and creeks of oil-rich southern Nigeria in 2006, demanding that local people get a more equitable share of the oil wealth, but Sunday night's attack marked the first time their campaign had reached Lagos.

MEND said "the problems facing our dear country Nigeria has nothing to do with militant freedom fighters but with the corrupt political leadership and certain arrogant tribes still living on past glory".

The group adopted a pugnacious tone in its Sunday statement, replete with Biblical references.

"The two-pronged approach of combining dialogue and intensifying attacks throughout the course of negotiations, will be the unique characteristics of Moses," MEND said, referring to its latest battles which it has called 'Hurricane Moses.'

State-run Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) has painted a grim picture of the fallout of the violence, saying monthly oil revenue this year dropped to around one billion dollars from an average of 2.2 billion dollars in 2008.

Nigeria, Africa's most populous country, relies on oil for more than 90 percent of its export earnings. Its foreign reserves have plummeted by about 10 billion dollars in six months to 43.19 billion dollars in early June.

African Union Troops Intervene to Prop-up Somalia Transitonal Federal Government

Monday, July 13, 2009
09:01 Mecca time, 06:01 GMT

AU troops 'intervene' in Somalia

Hospital officials say many women and children were among those wounded

African Union peacekeepers have reportedly intervened directly in support of government forces in repelling anti-government fighters in the Somali capital Mogadishu.

A spokesman for the AU force, whose remit allows them only to protect government buildings and defend themselves if attacked, told Al Jazeera its latest actions were a "show of force" and not combat engagement.

At least 40 opposition fighters were reported to have been killed in a day of intense battles in the Somali capital on Sunday as fighters advanced into northern Mogadishu, close to the presidential palace.

Hospital officials say many women and children were among those wounded.

'Show of force'

The 4,300-strong AU peacekeeping force was visible on the streets on Sunday, but an AU spokesman denied engaging in direct combat.

Major Barigye Bahoku told Al Jazeera that his forces were involved in what he called "a show of force".

"We have not been engaged [in fighting]," he said.

"We moved around in our convoy, with our equipment. We are not supposed to be confined ... rather we are supposed to provide security for all of Mogadishu.

"So we moved in, we showed force and we went back to the base and the government forces are continuing with their work."

Government 'retakes' capital

Sheikh Yusuf Mohamed Siad, the Somali defence minister, said government forces had since regained control of central Mogadishu.

"We have defeated the enemy and we have pushed them back from all the areas they had captured," he said.

Witnesses and officials from the interim government said opposition groups advanced so close to the presidential palace that AU peacekeepers guarding it were drawn into the fight for the first time.

"Amisom [the AU peacekeeping force] backed us up in this latest operation because the rebels were only one kilometre to the presidential palace," an official said.

"We lost three soldiers in battle and the other side left more dead bodies behind. I do not know their exact number."

Mohamed Sheikh Nor, a journalist in Mogadishu, told Al Jazeera that the fighting was some of the worst in recent days.

"Somali government officials have been requesting the AU peacekeeping force in Somalia, especially in the capital Mogadishu, to be part of the fighting against the opposition fighters.

"But the AU, up until now, has been declining to comment" on why they have not accepted the government's request, he said.

The peacekeepers - from Burundi and Uganda - generally try to avoid being drawn into the conflict in order to preserve their neutrality.

Their mandate includes the defence of the capital's port, airport and key government buildings.

Fighters belonging to al-Shabab and other anti-government groups control large areas of southern and central Somalia and have boxed in government troops and the AU force into a few blocks of Mogadishu.

Sharif Ahmed, Somalia's president, is struggling to take control over the Horn of Africa nation from the fighters bent on overthrowing his Western-backed government.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Zimbabwe: ZANU-PF Supporters Disrupt Constitutional Conference

Mugabe supporters disrupt conference

Sapa-AP
Jul 13, 2009

Militants from President Robert Mugabe’s party disrupted a conference to draw up a new constitution today, setting off scuffles with supporters of former opposition leader Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai before the meeting collapsed in disarray.

When Mugabe did not arrive at the meeting on time, Parliament Speaker Lovemore Moyo, a member of Tsvangirai’s Movement for Democratic Change, began his opening remarks but was drowned out by militants singing revolutionary songs. Moyowas forced to withdraw.

Under Zimbabwe’s unity government, an agreement that brought Mugabe and Tsvangirai together in February, a new constitution must be drawn up ahead of new elections within two years.

Mugabe has long resisted constitutional reforms, which might loosen his grip on the country he has ruled for nearly three decades.

Many delegates at today’s meeting alleged that the disruption was planned, citing a lack of security at the venue that allowed thousands of Mugabe loyalists to stream in.

"It is outrageous. This is delinquent behaviour," said Philius Njira, a member of a constitutional reform group.

The convention centre, which can hold 5,000 people, was filled to capacity, with hundreds more seated in aisles and on stairways.

Organizers had tried to limit each party to 600 delegates and 240 for veterans of Zimbabwe’s war for independence. Delegates from civil society groups also were invited.

Before the opening, dancing and ululating Mugabe militants showed the clenched fist salute of his ZANU-PF party, while MDC supporters waved their open hands.

Leaflets on constitutional reform were handed out but ZANU-PF supporters tore them up and threw them to the floor.

Mugabe was scheduled to open the conference at 10 am but did not arrive by noon.

Moyo said the conference aimed to begin the process of writing the "supreme law" of the country.

"A constitution is about people deciding how they are governed. It is not about the government or anyone else telling the people how they want to be governed," he said, before he was drowned out.

Eric Matinenga, the minister of constitutional affairs, who withdrew from the dais along with Moyo, told reporters organisers were meeting to try and salvage the conference.

But hundreds of delegates had already streamed out of the convention centre and there was still no sign of Mugabe.

MDC spokesman Nelson Chamisa told reporters that Tsvangirai was meeting with Mugabe to discuss the disruption of the meeting by "well coordinated ZANU-PF cadres."

There was no further information on when proceedings would resume. By late afternoon, police had cordoned off the convention centre and most delegates had left the venue.

Sunday, July 12, 2009

ANC U-Turn on Mining Nationalisation

ANC U-turn on mines

MATUMA LETSOALO | JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA - Jul 12 2009 06:00

Nationalising mines is not a government priority, a member of President Jacob Zuma's executive has told the Mail & Guardian. And Chamber of Mines chief executive Mzolisi Diliza has warned against allowing ideological battles in the ANC-led alliance to dominate debates on nationalising the country's key economic assets.

"Our key strategic agenda at the moment is to maintain the infrastructure development and grow the economy to create decent jobs," the executive member said. "Nationalisation is definitely not on the agenda."

ANC Youth League (ANCYL) president Julius Malema urged Zuma last week to fast-track the implementation of the Freedom Charter, which calls for the country's mineral wealth to be transferred to the ownership of the people.

"The calls for nationalisation must be reasonable, not ideological," Diliza said. And in the current economic crises, the government is unlikely to consider calls to nationalise key economic assets, he said, pointing out that the mining industry alone is worth more than R2-trillion.

"How is the government expected to raise the money to take over the industry while there are more pressing issues that require its attention?" Diliza asked. "Besides, what is it that the state will do better that is not done by the private sector to run the mines? "The executive member questioned the timing of Malema's call, saying the intention was partly driven by a strategy to bail out BEE companies within the industry that are struggling to survive. "We know 80% of the BEE deals in the industry are under pressure," he said.

"The government cannot afford to rescue capitalists by putting citizens in debt. If we take over the mines, we will carry the pain of retrenchments while the companies make billions of rands out of taxpayers' money," he said.

ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe publicly opposed Malema's call, insisting that the party had no plans to nationalise mines and that decisions taken at an ANC national conference "cannot be changed as we wish". But, pressured by the ANCYL and its alliance partners, the ruling party made an about-turn this week and said nationalisation was open to debate.

Young Communist League spokesperson Castro Ngobese said this week the government had used legislation giving the state control of mineral resources to transfer wealth to a few individuals such as Patrice Motsepe, Saki Macozoma and Tokyo Sexwale. "Our people have not had control whatsoever of our mines," he said. "It has been the state elite and its black and white business partners that have control over our mines."

'From the white elite to the black elite by the state elite'
Matuma Letsoalo asked Young Communist League chairperson David Masondo about its call for the nationalisation of mines

The ANC has challenged you by saying there is legislation that returns ownership of mineral deposits to the state.
The Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act is not nationalisation. It is essentially a tool to transfer mining equity from the white elite to the black elite by the state elite.

Is nationalisation feasible given the global economic meltdown?
This is the most appropriate time to nationalise the mines and banks. This will ensure that the state does not depend solely on the whims of private individuals to generate funds for its industrial strategy and social programmes such as free education.

Our mining industry is worth more than R2-trillion.
Our mines must be transferred back to us without any compensation. Business has no moral authority whatsoever to claim a cent for transferring what belongs to the people. And if they refuse to hand over these mines, they must be forced to do so.

Most state-owned enterprises have performed poorly.
It is up to the public through its democratically elected representatives to ensure that they appoint competent people to manage these companies.

Won't the calls for nationalisation chase investors away?
Investment for what and for whom? Investors must invest on our own terms and we must have control over the dividends of our work and resources.

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-07-12-anc-uturn-on-mines

Cheney Is Linked to Concealment of CIA Project

July 12, 2009

Cheney Is Linked to Concealment of C.I.A. Project

By SCOTT SHANE
New York Times

The Central Intelligence Agency withheld information about a secret counterterrorism program from Congress for eight years on direct orders from former Vice President Dick Cheney, the agency’s director, Leon E. Panetta, has told the Senate and House intelligence committees, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said Saturday.

The report that Mr. Cheney was behind the decision to conceal the still-unidentified program from Congress deepened the mystery surrounding it, suggesting that the Bush administration had put a high priority on the program and its secrecy.

Mr. Panetta, who ended the program when he first learned of its existence from subordinates on June 23, briefed the two intelligence committees about it in separate closed sessions the next day.

Efforts to reach Mr. Cheney through relatives and associates were unsuccessful.

The question of how completely the C.I.A. informed Congress about sensitive programs has been hotly disputed by Democrats and Republicans since May, when Speaker Nancy Pelosi accused the agency of failing to reveal in 2002 that it was waterboarding a terrorism suspect, a claim Mr. Panetta rejected.

The law requires the president to make sure the intelligence committees “are kept fully and currently informed of the intelligence activities of the United States, including any significant anticipated intelligence activity.” But the language of the statute, the amended National Security Act of 1947, leaves some leeway for judgment, saying such briefings should be done “to the extent consistent with due regard for the protection from unauthorized disclosure of classified information relating to sensitive intelligence sources and methods or other exceptionally sensitive matters.”

In addition, for covert action programs, a particularly secret category in which the role of the United States is hidden, the law says that briefings can be limited to the so-called Gang of Eight, consisting of the Republican and Democratic leaders of both houses of Congress and of their intelligence committees.

The disclosure about Mr. Cheney’s role in the unidentified C.I.A. program comes a day after an inspector general’s report underscored the central role of the former vice president’s office in restricting to a small circle of officials knowledge of the National Security Agency’s program of eavesdropping without warrants, a degree of secrecy that the report concluded had hurt the effectiveness of the counterterrorism surveillance effort.

An intelligence agency spokesman, Paul Gimigliano, declined on Saturday to comment on the report of Mr. Cheney’s role.

“It’s not agency practice to discuss what may or may not have been said in a classified briefing,” Mr. Gimigliano said. “When a C.I.A. unit brought this matter to Director Panetta’s attention, it was with the recommendation that it be shared appropriately with Congress. That was also his view, and he took swift, decisive action to put it into effect.”

Members of Congress have differed on the significance of the program, whose details remained secret and which even some Democrats have said was properly classified. Most of those interviewed, however, have said that it was an important activity that should have been disclosed to the intelligence committees.

Intelligence and Congressional officials have said the unidentified program did not involve the C.I.A. interrogation program and did not involve domestic intelligence activities. They have said the program was started by the counterterrorism center at the C.I.A. shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, but never became fully operational, involving planning and some training that took place off and on from 2001 until this year.

In the tense months after Sept. 11, when Bush administration officials believed new Qaeda attacks could occur at any moment, intelligence officials brainstormed about radical countermeasures. It was in that atmosphere that the unidentified program was devised and deliberately concealed from Congress, officials said.

Representative Peter Hoekstra of Michigan, the top Republican on the House intelligence committee, said last week that he believed Congress would have approved of the program only in the angry and panicky days after 9/11, on 9/12, he said, but not later, after fears and tempers had begun to cool.

One intelligence official, who would speak about the classified program only on condition of anonymity, said there was no resistance inside the C.I.A. to Mr. Panetta’s decision to end the program last month.

“Because this program never went fully operational and hadn’t been briefed as Panetta thought it should have been, his decision to kill it was neither difficult nor controversial,” the official said. “That’s worth remembering amid all the drama.”

Bill Harlow, a spokesman for George J. Tenet, who was the C.I.A. director when the unidentified program began, declined to comment on Saturday, noting that the program remained classified.

In the eight years of his vice presidency, Mr. Cheney was the Bush administration’s most vehement defender of the secrecy of government activities, particularly in the intelligence arena. He went to the Supreme Court to keep secret the advisers to his task force on energy, and won.

A report released on Friday by the inspectors general of five agencies about the National Security Agency’s domestic surveillance program makes clear that Mr. Cheney’s legal adviser, David S. Addington, had to approve personally every government official who was told about the program. The report said “the exceptionally compartmented nature of the program” frustrated F.B.I. agents who were assigned to follow up on tips it had turned up.

Mr. Addington could not be reached for comment on Saturday.

Questions over the adequacy and the truthfulness of the C.I.A.’s briefings for Congress date to the creation of the intelligence oversight committees in the 1970s after disclosures of agency assassination and mind-control programs and other abuses. But complaints increased in the Bush years, when the C.I.A. and other intelligence agencies took the major role in pursuing Al Qaeda.

The use of harsh interrogation methods, including waterboarding, for instance, was first described to a handful of lawmakers for the first time in September 2002. Ms. Pelosi and the C.I.A. have disagreed about what she was told, but in any case, the briefing occurred only after a terrorism suspect, Abu Zubaydah, had been waterboarded 83 times.

Democrats in Congress, who contend that the Bush administration improperly limited Congressional briefings on intelligence, are seeking to change the National Security Act to permit the full intelligence committees to be briefed on more matters. President Obama, however, has threatened to veto the intelligence authorization bill if the changes go too far, and the proposal is now being negotiated by the White House and the intelligence committees.

Representative Jan Schakowsky, a Democrat of Illinois on the House committee, wrote on Friday to the chairman, Representative Silvestre Reyes, a Democrat of Texas, to demand an investigation of the unidentified program and why Congress was not told of it. Aides said Mr. Reyes was reviewing the matter.

“There’s been a history of difficulty in getting the C.I.A. to tell us what they should,” said Representative Adam Smith, a Democrat of Washington. “We will absolutely be held accountable for anything the agency does.”

Mr. Hoekstra, the intelligence committee’s ranking Republican, said he would not judge the agency harshly in the case of the unidentified program, because it was not fully operational. But he said that in general, the agency had not been as forthcoming as the law required.

“We have to pull the information out of them to get what we need,” Mr. Hoekstra said.

Fighting Kills at Least 43 in Somalia Capital

Fighting kills at least 43 in Somali capital

12 July 2009 MOGADISHU - Somali government troops backed by African Union peacekeepers battled insurgents on Sunday in clashes that killed at least 43 people in north Mogadishu, residents and officials said.

Somalia’s government and a 4,300-strong AU force (AMISOM) have been unable to take control of rebel strongholds in Mogadishu and other parts of the Horn of Africa nation despite international support and training.

“We have killed 40 fighters from al Shabaab group and we continue to repulse them. We have now pushed them back from three northern districts of Mogadishu. AU peacekeepers were assisting us,” said Salad Ali Jelle, a parliamentarian who was involved in Sunday’s fighting.

Rebels were not immediately available for comment.

Mogadishu’s deputy mayor said the insurgents had captured an area near the presidential palace at the weekend. “AMISOM backed us up in this latest operation because the rebels were only one kilometre to the presidential palace,” said Abdifitah Shawey.

“We lost three soldiers in battle.”

Somalia’s interim government has been pushing for a stronger mandate for AMISOM to allow its soldiers to help government forces fight opposition groups. Ugandan and Burundi peacekeepers are only allowed to defend themselves if attacked and protect key sites such as the presidential palace, airport and harbour.

An ambulance driver told Reuters that he had seen eight dead fighters lying on the streets and had picked up 16 wounded. It was not clear if the eight bodies were al Shabaab fighters.

“Shelling into the residential areas is still going on. We do no have access into some areas,” said Ali Muse of Mogadishu Lifeline and Nationlink Ambulance service.

An AMISOM spokesman said, “Our troops were in imminent danger so we had to take some limited action because the rebels crossed the red line where they were not supposed to go to avoid our military action.”

Residents said they saw AU troops in armoured vehicles fighting against insurgents in north Mogadishu.

“I have seen early this morning tanks of AMISOM going towards the frontline of the fighting and after a short while we heard gunshots much louder and heavier than in the past days,” said resident Ahmed Haji.

Fighting in Somalia since Ethiopian troops ousted the Islamic Courts Union in late 2006 has killed at least 18,000 people and sent hundreds of thousands more fleeing from their homes.

On Saturday, clashes between insurgents and government troops killed at least 20 people in the heaviest fighting for a week in the capital.

Republic of Congo-Brazzaville to Hold National Elections

Congo poll to open amid veto call

People in the Republic of Congo are preparing to go to the polls in an election which opposition leaders say will be neither free nor fair.

President Denis Sassou-Nguesso has been in power for most of the past 30 years, and is hoping for another term.

But his opponents have urged voters to stay away, saying the government has inflated the electoral roll figures.

The BBC's Thomas Fessy in the capital Brazzaville says many people have left the city fearing unrest.

Mr Sassou-Nguesso told a rally of his supporters in the capital:
"Fear not and go and vote. There will not be any more war in Congo."

But his main rival, Mathias Dzon, and four other candidates have urged voters to boycott the polls.

Government officials say more than two million people have been registered to vote but Roger Bouka Owoko, head of the Congolese Observatory for Human Rights (OCDH), said that figure was "grotesque".

"Congo cannot have so many electors," he said. "This monstrous electoral register is the drawback of the electoral process."

The head of the European Commission delegation in Congo, Miguel Amado, said he also had concerns about the electoral roll being used and said many people had not received voting cards.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/africa/8146328.stm
Published: 2009/07/12 00:50:31 GMT

Saturday, July 11, 2009

Wellington Commons Tenants Win First Round in Fight Against Illegal Evictions

Wellington Commons Tenants Win First Round in Fight Against Illegal Evictions

Residents can stay for 30 more days, DTE will not shut-off services

by Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire

DETROIT--Residents of the Wellington Commons on Detroit's west side have won the right to remain in their apartments for another month. After receiving an informal letter from management on July 9 stating that they would be required to leave the following day, the tenants began to demand answers for why they would have to move because of financial problems faced by the owners.

On July 9 organizers from the Moratorium NOW! Coaliton to Stop Foreclosures and Evictions went to the apartment building to inform the tenants of their rights and to encourage them to struggle against the eviction. The Coalition issued a press release and attracted the local NBC affiliate, WDIV Channel 4, which covered the struggle extensively from the evening of July 9 through July 10.

When a representative of the management company arrived at Wellington Commons after 11:00 a.m. on July 10, he was questioned by tenants, journalists and members of the Moratroium NOW! Coalition. The management firm now controlling the building said that it was not true that tenants had to leave by July 10.

Also the management firm acknowledged that DTE Energy would not shut-off the utilities services on July 10. The name of the supervising firm is Elite Property Management and a man who called himself Bob spoke for the company saying that they wanted to place the residents in other apartment buildings managed by the company.

Bob told the Pan-African News Wire that the apartment building was owned by a hedge fund from New York and that the firm had decided to go out of business. One resident of the Wellington Commons told the PANW correspondent that a firm called Stillwater Capital was actually the owners.

Later two officers from the Detroit Police Department came on the scene and went into the building to talk with the management. The officers later told the residents that the owners of the building owed over $100,000 in past due utilities bills.

However, the actual amount of the bill could not be substantiated. Moreover, this was not the fault of the tenants who have utility costs included in their monthly rent payments.

Later the representative of the Elite Property Management company, who called himself Bob, said that any resident could move into another building supervised by the firm without paying a deposit.

The epidemic of foreclosure and eviction is a serious problem in Detroit and throughout the United States. In many cases, where people rent homes and apartments, the tenants are not aware of the financial difficulties facing the owners. When they are ordered to move by the management firms that take over operations, many residents are not aware of their rights. A great number of the evictions that are carried out by the private interests controlling the properties are in fact illegal because they are not conducted through the courts.

These problems are reflective of the need for a declaration of an economic state of emergency in Michigan and throughout the country. There needs to be a general moratorium on all foreclosures and evictions in the United States.

According to government statistics, over four million people have lost their jobs since late 2007. Also the rate of foreclosure increased by over 30% during the first quarter of 2009. All together nearly 30 million workers are either unemployed or underemployed in the United States.

Under such circumstances, it is not at all surprising that working people are losing their homes and apartments at a phenomenal rate. This is why there is the need for a broad-based fightback movement to wage a protracted struggle against foreclosure and eviction, for full employment, universal health care and the end to all imperialist wars of aggression and occupation.