Wednesday, November 12, 2025

Democrats Query Millions Trump Paid to Equatorial Guinea to Accept Deportees

Equatorial Guinean president Teodoro Obiang Nguema

Africa News

The U.S. government made a $7.5 million payment to the government of Equatorial Guinea as it seeks to deport people to the West African country and draws closer to heavily prosecuted leaders, according to the top Democratic senator on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen, D-N.H., said in a letter sent Monday to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and obtained by The Associated Press that “this highly unusual payment — to one of the most corrupt governments in the world — raises serious concerns over the responsible, transparent use of American taxpayer dollars."

Shaheen said in her letter that the $7.5 million payment stood out because it would would “far exceed the amount of U.S. foreign assistance provided over the last 8 years combined” to the country.

The payment, made from a fund for migration and refugee assistance, would be the first government-to-government transfer from that account, which was set up by Congress to respond to humanitarian crises. She questioned whether the payment was a permissible use of the money.

The State Department declined to comment on the details of diplomatic communications, but said, “Implementing the Trump Administration’s immigration policies is a top priority for the Department of State. As Secretary Rubio has said, we remain unwavering in our commitment to end illegal and mass immigration and bolster America’s border security.”

As the Trump administration looks to Africa for further deportations, the payment raised questions about how it is enmeshing its deportation agenda with other foreign policy goals, as well as the international leaders it is willing to trust.

The Trump administration, in aiming to ramp up deportations, has sought to forge agreements with countries to take in migrants who are not their citizens. Immigration advocacy groups have criticized the “third country” policy as a reckless tactic that violates due process rights and can strand deportees in countries with long histories of human rights violations and corruption.

Ethiopia Named as Host for 2027 UN Climate Summit

By Africa News

Ethiopia edged Nigeria to emerge as the host country for the 2027 climate summit.

The east African country also hosted this year's Africa Climate Summit in September.

Dubbed the “Africa COP”, the summit is expected to center Africa's role in advancing climate justice and solutions.

African countries, which are disproportionately affected by climate change despite their negligible contribution to greenhouse gas emissions, have long demanded that developed countries pay more for adaptation and mitigation.

This year's summit - COP30 - opened Monday in Belem, Brazil with a call to world leaders and delegates to confront rising global temperatures and push for urgent, coordinated climate action.

The conference also focuses on enhancing emissions reduction and climate resilience, while promoting an inclusive and equitable transition.

The host for next year's talks is yet to be decided as Australia and Turkey continue to vie for the chance.

UN Agency Warns of Displacement Surge, ‘Mass Killings’ in Sudan’s El Fasher

11 November 2025

Displaced people who fled fighting in El Fasher arrive in Tawila, North Darfur, on Oct. 27, 2025.

November 11, 2025 (GENEVA/PORT SUDAN) – The UN’s migration agency (IOM) warned on Tuesday that mass killings, ethnic violence, and extreme insecurity in El Fasher, North Darfur, have triggered a dramatic surge in displacement and worsened Sudan’s humanitarian crisis.

IOM Director General Amy Pope, beginning a five-day visit to the country, said the crisis in El Fasher was the “direct result of nearly 18 months of siege” that has cut families off from essential supplies.

“Our teams are responding, but insecurity and depleted supplies mean we are only reaching a fraction of those in need,” Pope said in a statement. “Without safe access and urgent funding, humanitarian operations risk grinding to a halt.”

In the last two weeks, heavy shelling and ground assaults have displaced nearly 90,000 people from El Fasher. Tens of thousands more remain trapped inside the city facing “famine-like conditions” as hospitals and water systems collapse, the IOM said.

The violence is also spreading, with an estimated 38,990 people fleeing fighting in North Kordofan between October 26 and November 9, many travelling on foot and sleeping outdoors.

The agency noted increasing reports of “alarming protection risks,” including arbitrary detention, looting, and gender-based violence.

Humanitarian operations are now “on the brink of collapse,” the statement warned, with warehouses nearly empty and aid convoys facing significant insecurity and access restrictions.

Despite the challenges, the IOM said a convoy was on its way to Tawila, North Darfur, with shelter and other items for 7,500 people. Its local partners are also implementing emergency projects for 60,000 people across North and South Darfur.

The IOM urged donors and the international community to act immediately to prevent further loss of life and ensure safe humanitarian access.

RSF Detains Women, Children in West Kordofan, Accusing Relatives of Army Ties

11 November 2025

A woman displaced by RSF attacks on the Zamzam camp prepares food in Tawila, North Darfur, on April 16, 2025.

November 11, 2025 (BABANUSA) – The Sudan Doctors Network revealed on Tuesday that the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) arrested children and women near the city of Babanusa, West Kordofan state, accusing their relatives of belonging to the army.

The RSF has sent additional reinforcements to the areas around the besieged Babanusa in preparation for an attack, after previous attempts to seize the city failed.

The network said in a statement that “an RSF-affiliated force detained seven civilian families, including women and children, in the areas surrounding Babanusa city, accusing their relatives of belonging to the armed forces, continuing its approach of arbitrary detention and collective punishment against civilians.”

The network condemned this behavior, stressing that it represents a clear violation of international humanitarian law and a breach of the principles of protecting civilians in times of conflict.

It stated that targeting families based on suspicion or affiliation constitutes a war crime.

The network held the RSF responsible for the safety of the detainees, calling on human rights and UN organizations to intervene immediately to secure their release and to ensure such violations against civilians are not repeated.

However, an advisor to the RSF commander, Al-Basha Tabeeq, denied that the RSF had detained the families in Babanusa.

In a post on the “X” platform, he claimed that Babanusa city has been devoid of civilians since the middle of last year, accusing the Sudan Doctors Network of spreading “rumours to mislead public opinion,” according to the post.

The RSF has been besieging Babanusa from all directions since January 2024, having launched violent attacks aimed at controlling the army command there, but without success in the face of the armed forces’ fierce defence of the city.

The RSF controls most areas of West Kordofan, including the state capital Al Fula, and the cities of Muglad, Meiram, Lagawa, Al-Khawi, Al-Nuhud, and Wad Banda. Meanwhile, the army controls Babanusa and some oil fields in Heglig, adjacent to South Sudan.

Egyptian Foreign Minister Visits Sudan, Says Country Backs Comprehensive Settlement

11 November 2025

Head of the Sudanese Sovereign Council meeting visiting Egyptian Foreign Minister on Nov 11, 2025

November 11, 2025 (PORT SUDAN) – The President of the Sovereignty Council and Army Commander, Abdel Fattah al-Burhan, held a meeting with Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdel-Aty in Port Sudan, eastern Sudan, during which they discussed ways to support bilateral relations.

Abdel-Aty said in a press statement that “Egypt is in contact with all regional and international parties to enhance efforts aimed at reaching a comprehensive settlement of the Sudanese crisis, in a way that preserves the capabilities of the Sudanese people and achieves their aspirations for security and stability.”

He noted that his country is actively engaged in efforts aimed at a ceasefire, whether bilaterally or in regional and international forums, foremost among them the Quad mechanism.

The Quad mechanism, comprising Egypt, the United States, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE, aims to resolve the conflict in Sudan. On September 12, it proposed a roadmap based on securing humanitarian aid for three months, followed by a ceasefire and entry into a political process.

The Sudanese government presented its vision on the truce proposal, welcoming what it calls efforts to end the suffering of the Sudanese people, but stressed at the same time the continuation of general mobilization and mobilization to “defeat the Rapid Support Forces militarily.”

The Egyptian Foreign Minister stated, in a press release published by the Sovereignty Council, that he conveyed a message of support and solidarity from President Abdel Fattah El-Sisi to Abdel Fattah al-Burhan.

He reported that the meeting with al-Burhan addressed bilateral relations and ways to support and develop them in the political, economic, and commercial fields, as well as the common destiny that unites the two countries, especially in the field of water security.

He pointed out that the two countries’ positions are identical regarding the issue of water security, considering it an existential issue for the peoples of both countries.

Abdel-Aty mentioned that he listened to a briefing from the President of the Sovereignty Council on the field conditions on the ground and the humanitarian situation, stressing his country’s support for Sudan and its national institutions, including the armed forces.

He stressed that his country’s principled position supports the unity and sovereignty of Sudan.

Egypt is considered one of the strongest supporters of the Sudanese government and the army in the conflict it has been waging against the Rapid Support Forces since April 15, 2023.

Sudan Shuns ‘Quad’ Mechanism Over UAE Role

11 November 2025

Sudan's FM (C) meets Egyptian counterpart (L) and UN humanitarian chief in Port Sudan on Nov 11, 2025

November 11, 2025 (PORT SUDAN) – Sudanese Foreign Minister Muhieldin Salim confirmed that the government “does not deal officially” with the “Quad” mechanism, explaining that it “was not issued by a decision from the Security Council or any international organization.”

Salim added: “We deal with our brothers in Egypt and Saudi Arabia, and with friends in the United States in bilateral capacities… and we coordinate with them as happened in our coordination today with Egypt and the United Nations.”

The Sudanese government objects to the presence of the UAE in the Quad mechanism, which also includes Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and the United States. It accuses Abu Dhabi of supporting the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) in its war against the Sudanese army. Khartoum says the UAE should not play the role of mediator while it is fuelling the conflict by supporting the other side.

The Sudanese minister’s statements regarding the Quad came after a joint tripartite meeting held in Port Sudan on Tuesday, which included Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty and UN Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs Tom Fletcher.

The tripartite meeting focused on the need for the international community to fulfill its humanitarian responsibilities in Sudan.

The talks come amid the severe deterioration of the humanitarian situation in El Fasher, the capital of North Darfur, since the RSF took control of it on October 26.

Reports indicate the displacement of large numbers of the population amid reports of thousands being subjected to serious violations, while international humanitarian organizations demand to be allowed entry to deliver aid, without success so far.

Salim said the talks focused on “the situations that have arisen after the entry of the rebellious militia into El Fasher city and the subsequent displacement of large numbers of citizens,” using the description the government uses for the RSF.

He added that the meeting “discussed in detail the humanitarian conditions experienced by the displaced in the areas of Al-Dabba and Tawila, as well as the situations of those besieged in Babanusa, Kadugli, and Dilling.”

The Foreign Minister affirmed that opinions “were in complete agreement during the tripartite meeting on the necessity of the international community fulfilling its responsibilities and putting pressure on the rebellious militia and the countries supporting it.”

Salim also noted that the meeting addressed what he described as the “file of mercenaries recruited by the militia,” calling for it to be dealt with “as required by the texts of international law,” and stressing that what is happening is a “direct invasion.”

Sudan Relief Operations Are on the Brink of Collapse, UN Agency Warns

A Sudanese who fled el-Fasher city, after Sudan’s paramilitary forces killed hundreds of people in the western Darfur region, ties her tent at her camp in Tawila, Sudan, Sunday, Nov. 2, 2025. (AP Photo/Mohammed Abaker)

By NOHA ELHENNAWY

10:34 PM EST, November 11, 2025

CAIRO (AP) — The U.N. migration agency warned on Tuesday that humanitarian efforts in Sudan’s war-torn North Darfur region might come to a complete halt unless immediate funding and safe delivery of relief supplies are ensured.

“Despite the rising need, humanitarian operations are now on the brink of collapse,” the International Organization for Migration (IOM) said in a statement. It added: “Warehouses are nearly empty, aid convoys face significant insecurity, and access restrictions continue to prevent the delivery of sufficient aid.”

The IOM said more funding is needed to ease the humanitarian impact of the war between the Sudanese army and its rival, the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. The agency warned of “an even greater catastrophe” if its appeal went unheeded.

“Our teams are responding, but insecurity and depleted supplies mean we are only reaching a fraction of those in need,” IOM Director General Amy Pope said in a statement.

Pope is in Sudan and U.N. humanitarian chief Tom Fletcher arrived Tuesday in Port Sudan where he met with authorities, the U.N.'s humanitarian partners and the diplomatic community, U.N. deputy spokesman Farhan Haq said.

The RSF’s recent capture of North Darfur’s capital, el-Fasher, left hundreds dead and forced tens of thousands of people to flee reported atrocities by the paramilitary force, according to aid groups and U.N. officials. The IOM said nearly 9O,000 people have left el-Fasher and surrounding villages, undertaking a perilous journey through unsafe routes where they have no access to food, water or medical assistance.

The U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs warned that the situation in North Darfur “remains volatile” following the RSF takeover, stressing that while large-scale clashes have subsided, “sporadic fighting and drone activity persist, leaving civilians at risk of looting, forced recruitment and gender-based violence,” Haq said.

Tens of thousands have arrived at overcrowded displacement camps in Tawila, about 70 kilometers (43 miles) from el-Fasher. In the camps, the displaced find themselves in barren areas with few tents and insufficient food and medical supplies.

‘The displaced are too many’

“We have been getting little food from community kitchens here; we only get lunch meals,” Sohaiba Omar, 20, told The Associated Press from a shelter in Diba Nayra camp in Tawila. “We also need a nearby source of water and toilets. Disposing of our wastes in the open can make us fall sick and catch diseases like cholera.”

Batoul Mohamed, a 25-year-old volunteer at the camp, said, “The displaced are too many. They are also hungry. It is very difficult to have people come up to us saying that they could not eat because there not was not enough food.”

Aid group Doctors Without Borders warned that malnutrition in displacement camps has reached “staggering” rates. Over 70% of children under the age of 5 who reached Tawila between the fall of el-Fasher at the end of October and Nov. 3, were acutely malnourished, and more than a third experienced severe acute malnutrition, the group said Tuesday.

“The true scale of the crisis is likely far worse than reported,” it said.

The violence has spread to other parts of Sudan including the regions of Western Darfur and Kordofan, forcing more people to flee. Nearly 39,000 people fled North Kordofan between Oct. 26 and Nov. 9, according to the IOM.

The war between the RSF and the military began in 2023, when tensions erupted between the two former allies that were meant to oversee a democratic transition after a 2019 uprising. The fighting has killed at least 40,000 people, according to the World Health Organization, and displaced 12 million. Aid groups say the true death toll could be many times higher.

Nations press on with ceasefire efforts

Also on Tuesday, Egypt’s Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty met with Sudan’s army chief Gen. Abdel-Fattah Burhan in Port Sudan on the Red Sea as global efforts to reach a ceasefire and avert a humanitarian disaster in Sudan gathered pace.

Abdelatty expressed Egypt’s unequivocal support for Sudan’s armed forces and condemned the atrocities in el-Fasher.

“Standing by Sudan is a matter of principle,” he told reporters in a news conference after the meeting, adding that Egypt supports all of Sudan’s “national state institutions including the armed forces”.

He stressed the need to commit to the peace plan announced in September by a quartet including the U.S., Egypt, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, according to a statement issued by Egypt’s Foreign Ministry. The plan envisages a three-month humanitarian truce, followed by a nine-month political process.

The RSF said last week it agreed to the quartet’s humanitarian truce. The army said it welcomes the proposal, but will only agree to it if the RSF withdraws from civilian areas and gives up its weapons.

—-

Edith M. Lederer contributed to this report from the United Nations

Tuesday, November 11, 2025

Thousands of Africans Returned Home Through an EU Program

The European Union has given a U.N.-affiliated body hundreds of millions of dollars to help thousands of African migrants return from failed journeys to Europe and support them back home. But The Associated Press interviewed several of the returnees and saw a WhatsApp group of dozens more who say they’ve received little or nothing.

By MONIKA PRONCZUK

5:57 AM EST, November 11, 2025

CONAKRY, Guinea (AP) — When Oumar Bella Diallo boarded a plane home to the West African nation of Guinea in July, the weary 24-year-old thought his migration ordeal was over.

He had spent almost a year trying to reach Europe. He said he was attacked by police and scammed for money as he crossed Mali, Algeria and Niger, at one point limping past corpses in the desert. After seeing fellow migrants die from hunger and exhaustion, he gave up.

He is among tens of thousands of Africans returning home with the help of the International Organization for Migration, as Europe spends millions of dollars to deter migrants before they reach its shores. The European Union-funded IOM program pays for return flights and promises follow-up assistance.

But migrants tell The Associated Press that promises by the United Nations-affiliated organization are not fulfilled, leaving them to face trauma, debt and family shame on their own. Desperation could fuel new migration attempts.

The AP spoke to three returnees in Gambia and four in Guinea, and was shown a WhatsApp group of over 50 members founded around returnees’ frustration with the IOM. They described months of reaching out to the IOM with no reply.

Diallo said he told the IOM he wanted to start a small business. But all he has received is a phone number for an IOM counselor and a five-day orientation course on accountability, management and personal development. He said many returnees had trouble grasping it because of low education levels.

“Even yesterday, I called him,” Diallo said. “They said for the moment, we have to wait until they call us. Every time, if I call them, that’s what they tell me.” He said he asked for medical help with a foot injured on his migration attempt but was told it was impossible.

As the oldest child of a single mother, the responsibility for supporting relatives weighs heavily.

“If there’s not so much money, you’re the head of the family too,” he said.

Millions spent but little scrutiny

The IOM program is financed almost completely by the EU and was launched in 2016. Between 2022 and 2025, it repatriated over 100,000 sub-Saharan migrants from north Africa and Niger.

Of the $380 million budget for that period, 58% is allocated for post-return assistance, the IOM said.

Francois Xavier Ada with the IOM regional office in West Africa told the AP that over 90,000 returnees have started, and 60,000 completed, the reintegration process “tailored to individual needs.” Ada said that can “support anything from housing, medical assistance or psychosocial services to business grants, vocational trainings and job placement.”

Migrants told the AP they had not received any of those.

Ada said the IOM was ”concerned” to learn of people kept waiting and “happy to look into these cases.” He added that delays can occur due to high caseloads or incomplete documentation, and medical assistance is not guaranteed.

Experts said there is little insight into how the EU money helps returnees. The European Court of Auditors, an EU body, audited the program’s first phase between 2016 and 2021 and said it failed to demonstrate sustainable reintegration results, monitoring was “insufficient to prove results” and the EU “could not prove value for money.”

“The EU policy is obsessed with returns,” said Josephine Liebl with the Brussels-based European Council on Refugees and Exiles. “The question of how this support actually helps people in very vulnerable situations receives very little public scrutiny, which is due to the fact that there is such a lack of transparency and accountability of how EU funding works outside the EU.”

The EU did not respond to questions on the details of the budget beyond repeating IOM statements.

Moustapha Darboe, a Gambian journalist who interviewed over 50 returnees for an investigation into the IOM program, said they had to wait a long time, often almost a year, and support they eventually received did not match their skills and ambitions.

“The IOM is donor-based,” he told the AP. “Their primary focus is not to help these people, their primary focus is to tick their box.”

Haunted by shame and stigma

The IOM program has coincided with Europe’s other efforts to deter migration, including paying some African governments to intercept migrants, an approach denounced by human rights groups that accuse African authorities of being complicit in abuses.

Europe’s efforts appear to be working. In the first eight months of 2025, it recorded 112,000 “irregular” crossings, over 20% less than the same period last year, and a drop of over 50% from two years ago.

Experts say that while the IOM’s return program helps to extract people from inhumane treatment, the promised follow-up support is often impossible to deliver as most migrants’ home countries have poorly functioning state services.

“The major missing piece is the support for the returnees to get reintegrated, have access to social protection and to labor markets,” said Camille Le Coz, director of the Brussels-based Migration Policy Institute.

Kabinet Kante, a 20-year-old from Guinea who dreamed of being a footballer in Germany, spent almost two years trying to reach Europe. He said he was intercepted at sea and dumped in the desert, and still wakes at night screaming.

He returned to Guinea in July with the IOM’s help. He said he wanted to learn how to drive a bulldozer but the IOM has ignored his calls, and when he went to their office, they told him to stop calling.

He set up the WhatsApp group for over 50 other returned and frustrated migrants. He also records TikTok videos warning against the treacherous route to Europe.

But he has no way to pay back his parents, who supported his journey by sending money to pay smugglers and bribe officials.

“Right now, I am doing nothing,” he said, head bowed with embarrassment.

‘Going on an adventure’

Like many sub-Saharan African countries, Guinea has rich natural resources, including the world’s largest iron ore deposits. But experts say bad governance and exploitation by foreign companies have left most of the population destitute.

Over half of Guinea’s population of 15 million is experiencing “unprecedented levels of poverty,” according to the World Food Program, and cannot read or write. The official monthly minimum wage is less than $65. Most people work in the informal economy and earn even less.

“Those with degrees work as taxi drivers here,” Diallo said. “If there were, like elsewhere, job opportunities in the country, everyone would stay here.”

Diallo and Kante said they are not planning on “going on an adventure” any time soon — a term used widely to describe the migration route to Europe.

But that’s mostly because they don’t have money. They dream of working in Europe legally, but the visa process can cost hundreds of dollars, and applicants from sub-Saharan countries have a high rejection rate.

Elhadj Mohamed Diallo, director of the Guinean Organization for the Fight Against Irregular Migration, is a former migrant who reached Libya before turning back. He now works with the IOM on reintegration activities but indicated doubt about their ability to prevent returnees from migrating again.

He said he doesn’t blame them as life at home becomes more difficult.

“We aren’t helping them so that they can stay. We are helping them so they can take control of their lives again,” he said. “Migration is a natural thing. Blocking a person is like blocking the tide. When you block water, the water will find its way.”

Takeaways from an AP Report on a Europe-funded Program Returning African Migrants

By MONIKA PRONCZUK

11:50 PM EST, November 10, 2025

CONAKRY, Guinea (AP) — The European Union has given the International Organization for Migration hundreds of millions of dollars to help tens of thousands of African migrants return from failed journeys to Europe and support them back home.

But The Associated Press interviewed several of the returnees in Gambia and Guinea and saw a WhatsApp group of dozens more who say they’ve received little or nothing of the promised economic and other support.

Migration experts assert that the IOM, a United Nations-affiliated organization, isn’t giving enough help to people who are often traumatized by migration attempts. Desperation could fuel new attempts. The IOM says it is concerned to hear that people are left waiting but can’t speak about individual cases.

The EU didn’t provide details about where the money goes. The European Court of Auditors, an EU body, audited the program’s first phase between 2016 and 2021 and said the EU “could not prove value for money.”

Here’s what to know.

Aiming to keep migrants out of Europe

The EU-funded IOM program was launched in 2016 and pays for return flights for African migrants and promises follow-up assistance back home. Between 2022 and 2025, it repatriated over 100,000 sub-Saharan migrants from north Africa and Niger.

Of the $380 million budget for that period, 58% is allocated for post-return assistance. The IOM says it can “support anything from housing, medical assistance or psychosocial services to business grants, vocational trainings and job placement.”

The IOM program has coincided with Europe’s other efforts to deter migration, including paying some African governments to intercept migrants, an approach that human rights groups have criticized. Europe’s efforts appear to be working. In the first eight months of 2025, it recorded 112,000 “irregular” crossings, over 20% less than the same period last year, and a drop of over 50% from two years ago.

What returnees say

Returnees tell the AP that IOM promises of support back home are not fulfilled, leaving them to face trauma, massive debt and family shame on their own.

The AP spoke to three returnees in Gambia and four in Guinea, and was shown a WhatsApp group of over 50 members founded around returnees’ frustration with the IOM. They described months of reaching out to the IOM with no reply.

Kabinet Kante, a 20-year-old from Guinea, spent almost two years trying to reach Europe. He said he was intercepted at sea and dumped in the desert, and still wakes at night screaming.

He returned to Guinea in July with the IOM’s help. He said he wanted to learn how to drive a bulldozer but the IOM has ignored his calls, and when he went to their office, they told him to stop calling. He set up the WhatsApp group for over 50 other returned migrants in a similar situation.

He has no way to pay back his parents, who supported his journey, sending money to pay smugglers and bribe officials.

“Right now, I am doing nothing,” he said, head bowed with embarrassment.

What the IOM and EU say

Francois Xavier Ada with the IOM regional office in West Africa told the AP that over 90,000 returnees have started, and 60,000 completed, the reintegration process “tailored to individual needs.”

Ada said the IOM was ”concerned” to learn of people who were kept waiting and “happy to look into these cases.” He said delays can occur due to high caseloads or incomplete documentation. Medical support is provided based on “assessed needs.”

The IOM’s country office in Guinea said it could not speak of individual cases because they were confidential.

The EU did not respond to questions beyond repeating IOM statements.

What experts say

Josephine Liebl with the Brussels-based European Council on Refugees and Exiles said that “the question of how this support actually helps people in very vulnerable situations receives very little public scrutiny, which is due to the fact that there is such a lack of transparency and accountability of how EU funding works outside the EU.”

Experts say that while the IOM’s return program helps to extract people from inhumane treatment, the promised follow-up support is often impossible to deliver as most migrants’ home countries have poorly functioning state services.

“The major missing piece is the support for the returnees to get reintegrated, have access to social protection and to labor markets,” said Camille Le Coz, director of the Brussels-based Migration Policy Institute.

Elhadj Mohamed Diallo, director of the Guinean Organization for the Fight Against Irregular Migration, works with the IOM on reintegration activities. He said he doesn’t blame returnees who try to migrate again.

“We aren’t helping them so that they can stay. We are helping them so they can take control of their lives again,” he said. “Migration is a natural thing. Blocking a person is like blocking the tide. When you block water, the water will find its way.”

European Union and Indian Navies Take Over Ship Used by Pirates off Somalia to Seize Tanker

By JON GAMBRELL

8:36 PM EST, November 11, 2025

DUBAI, United Arab Emirates (AP) — The European Union and Indian navies have taken over a ship used by pirates off the coast of Somalia to seize a Malta-flagged tanker, the EU force said Wednesday.

The Iranian fishing vessel called the Issamohamadi had been abandoned off the coast of Somalia following their seizure last week of the Hellas Aphrodite, which had been carrying a load of gasoline from India to South Africa. The pirates used the Issamohamadi, a type of traditional ship known across the Persian Gulf as a dhow, as a “mother ship” for a series of assaults capped by their taking of the tanker.

A team from the ESPS Victoria, a Spanish frigate, boarded the dhow and said the Issamohamadi’s original crew on board were in “good condition, safe and free.” Iran has not acknowledged the seizure of the ship.

The pirate group “operating in the area has been definitely disrupted,” the EU naval force’s Operation Atalanta said in a statement. EU forces “have gathered evidence and intelligence of the incident that together with the evidence collected on board Merchant Tanker Hellas Aphrodite, will be submitted to support the legal prosecution of the perpetrators.”

Piracy off the Somali coast peaked in 2011, when 237 attacks were reported. Somali piracy in the region that year cost the world’s economy some $7 billion, with $160 million paid out in ransoms, according to the Oceans Beyond Piracy monitoring group.

The threat was diminished by increased international naval patrols, a strengthening central government in Somalia, and other efforts.

However, Somali pirate attacks have resumed at a greater pace over the last year, in part due to the insecurity caused by Yemen’s Houthi rebels launching attacks in the Red Sea corridor over the Israel-Hamas war in the Gaza Strip. The Houthis have signaled they’ve stopped their attacks as a shaky ceasefire holds in Gaza.

In 2024, there were seven reported incidents off Somalia, according to the International Maritime Bureau. So far this year, multiple fishing boats have been seized by Somali pirates. The Hellas Aphrodite represents the first commercial ship seized by pirates off Somalia since May 2024.

JON GAMBRELL

Gambrell is the news director for the Gulf and Iran for The Associated Press. He has reported from each of the Gulf Cooperation Council countries, Iran and other locations across the world since joining the AP in 2006.

Monday, November 10, 2025

Somalian Forces Kill Senior Al-Shabaab Commanders in Bakool, Bay

By Al Mayadeen English

10 Nov 2025 14:24

Somali forces killed senior Al-Shabaab commanders in Bakool and Bay regions, seizing weapons and disrupting terror plans.

The Somali National Army announced on Sunday that it has killed several senior Al-Shabaab leaders in coordinated operations in the Bakool and Bay regions, delivering a significant blow to the terror group.

The Ministry of Defense confirmed that Mohamed Abdi Mohamed Noor, also known as “Gofu,” who was responsible for multiple attacks on civilians, was killed in a precision operation in Abal village, a strategic settlement 21 kilometres south of Hudur, Bakool’s capital. During the operation, Somali forces also seized weapons and documents detailing terror attack plans.

In a separate engagement, two other senior Al-Shabaab members, including Yahya, known as Abu Khalid, a key organizer of attacks, and Sharif Amir, who later succumbed to severe injuries sustained during the clash, were eliminated.

“The Somali Army will continue operations against Al-Shabaab and will not allow safe havens for its members or remnants,” the ministry said. “These operations aim to restore security and stability across Somalia and will continue until all threats are removed.”

Intensified military campaigns

The latest operations come amid an intensified military campaign by Somali forces that began earlier this year. Since February 2025, over 220 raids and airstrikes have targeted Al-Shabaab positions, resulting in more than 860 militant casualties.

Operations have focused on southern and central provinces, as well as Puntland and the northeastern Bari region, with coordination and logistical support from international partners. Somali forces have also strengthened local security presence in recovered areas to prevent the resurgence of Al-Shabaab elements.

Strengthening Somali state authority

By targeting terror leaders and disrupting operational planning, the Somali Army aims to secure strategic locations and prevent attacks on urban centres, including Mogadishu.

“The operations in Bakool and Bay show that the Somali security forces can effectively dismantle Al-Shabab’s networks while safeguarding civilian populations,” the ministry added.

Al-Shabaab, affiliated with al-Qaeda, has waged a sustained insurgency against the Somali state. The group seeks to impose extremist ideology, destabilize governance, and maintain control over rural areas. It has repeatedly targeted civilians and security forces, exploiting weak state presence and local grievances to sustain its operations.

Intense Fighting in Central Sudan Displaces 2,000 People in Just Days, a UN Agency Says

By FATMA KHALED

10:42 AM EST, November 10, 2025

CAIRO (AP) — Intense fighting in central Sudan displaced some 2,000 people over the past three days, the U.N. migration agency said Monday, the latest in a war that has convulsed the country for more than two years and killed tens of thousands.

The International Organization for Migration said the displaced fled from several towns and villages in the area of Bara in North Kordofan province between Friday and Sunday.

Kordofan has been one of two areas, along with the western Darfur region, that recently became the epicenter of the war between the Sudanese army and its rival paramilitary Rapid Support Forces.

The RSF capture of the key city of el-Fasher left hundreds dead and forced tens of thousands to flee to overcrowded camps to escape reported atrocities by the paramilitary force, according to aid groups and U.N. officials. The IOM said nearly 92,000 people have left el-Fasher and surrounding villages.

The war between the RSF and the military began in 2023, when tensions erupted between the two former allies that were meant to oversee a democratic transition after a 2019 uprising. The fighting has killed at least 40,000 people, according to the World Health Organization, and displaced 12 million. However, aid groups say the true death toll could be many times higher.

In late October, RSF fighters launched attacks in the town of Bara in North Kordofan, killing at least 47 people, including women and children, the local aid group Sudan Doctors Network said at the time.

The IOM estimated that nearly 39,000 people had fled several villages and towns in North Kordofan since Oct. 26. They were mostly headed north, toward the Sudanese capital of Khartoum and the adjacent Omdurman region, as well as Sheikan in North Kordofan.

Also Monday, the RSF claimed its fighters entered the town of Babanusa in West Kordofan province and were heading toward the army headquarters.

Salah Semsaya, a volunteer with the local group Emergency Response Rooms, told The Associated Press that other volunteers from the town of Babanusa working with charity kitchens in the area reported a decline in the number of families coming to get food — apparently an indication that many had left or fled the area. Definitive figures could not be confirmed.

Darfur atrocities

In Darfur meanwhile, Sudan Doctors Network reported on Sunday that the RSF collected hundreds of bodies from the streets of el-Fasher and buried some in mass graves while burning others.

The RSF was acting in a “desperate attempt to conceal evidence of their crimes against civilians,” the network said.

Satellite images analyzed last week appeared to show the RSF disposing of bodies after they seized and rampaged through el-Fasher. Images by the Colorado-based firm Vantor show a fire at the Saudi hospital in el-Fasher on Thursday, near a collection of white objects seen days earlier in other Vantor photos.

The Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian Research Lab described the images as showing the “burning of objects that may be consistent with bodies.”

FATMA KHALED

Khaled is based in the Middle East region. She covers humanitarian crises, conflict, among other news beats for The Associated Press.

South Africa’s Apartheid-era Crimes Inquiry is Delayed Over Legal Objections

South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa attends the 17th annual BRICS summit in Rio de Janeiro, Sunday, July 6, 2025. (AP Photo/Eraldo Peres, file)

By MICHELLE GUMEDE

1:00 PM EST, November 10, 2025

JOHANNESBURG (AP) — An inquiry into allegations that South Africa’s Black-led governments interfered with investigations into apartheid-era crimes was postponed on its first day Monday over objections to one of the inquiry’s lawyers.

President Cyril Ramaphosa ordered the inquiry in April after decades of pressure from families of victims who say post-apartheid governments have failed them by not prosecuting those responsible. The country’s racist system of apartheid officially ended in 1994.

The National Prosecuting Authority on Monday argued that Ishmael Semenya, the inquiry’s chief evidence leader, was compromised because he previously advised on a former prosecuting policy for apartheid-era crimes that was declared unconstitutional.

The inquiry’s head, Judge Sisi Khampepe, ordered the NPA and others backing the objection, including South Africa’s justice department, to file any application for Semenya’s recusal by Wednesday. The judge ordered the inquiry to continue on Nov. 26, when the application would be considered. Semenya did not comment.

Around 150 cases of apartheid-era crimes had been recommended for prosecution by South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission, which was established by then- President Nelson Mandela in 1996 and aimed at documenting the era’s abuses.

What to know about 

That commission offered some perpetrators amnesty in exchange for their confessions, but many did not ask for or receive amnesty, and the lack of prosecutions has long been a grievance for many South Africans.

Mandela’s African National Congress party was pivotal in ending apartheid, but ANC-led governments since then have been criticized for failing to ensure abuses were investigated.

In 2008, a court in the capital, Pretoria, criticized a National Prosecuting Authority policy as “absurd and unconstitutional” and said it did not prioritize prosecutions for apartheid-era crimes. Semenya advised on that policy.

In January, more than 20 families of apartheid-era victims sued Ramaphosa and his government, seeking around $9.7 million in damages and an independent inquiry into possible interference in investigations.

Ramaphosa ordered the inquiry as part of the settlement in that case. Damages are still being considered by a court.

South Africa’s government has moved to confront the legacy of apartheid this year by ordering new inquiries into the killings of several prominent figures by apartheid security forces, some of them over a half-century later.

Last month, a new inquest found that then-ANC leader Albert Luthuli was beaten to death in 1967 and did not die after being hit by a freight train, as an original inquest by apartheid authorities found. Luthuli’s family had called for his death to be investigated.

___

MICHELLE GUMEDE

Gumede is a Johannesburg-based text news reporter for The Associated Press. She covers a wide range of news topics, including health, climate change, and politics in South Africa.

How Trump’s Support for a White Minority Group in South Africa Led to a US Boycott of the G20 Summit

By GERALD IMRAY

1:31 PM EST, November 10, 2025

CAPE TOWN, South Africa (AP) — U.S. President Donald Trump says that his government will boycott the Group of 20 summit this month in South Africa over his claims that a white minority group there is being violently persecuted. Those claims have been widely rejected.

Trump announced Friday on social media that no U.S. government official will attend the Nov. 22-23 summit in Johannesburg “as long as these Human Rights abuses continue.” South Africa’s Black-led government has been a regular target for Trump since he returned to office.

In February, Trump issued an executive order stopping U.S. financial assistance to South Africa, citing its treatment of the Afrikaner white minority. His administration has also prioritized Afrikaners for refugee status in the U.S. and says they will be given most of the 7,500 places available this fiscal year.

The South African government — and some Afrikaners themselves — say Trump’s claims of persecution are baseless.

Descendants of European settlers

Afrikaners are South Africans who are descended mainly from Dutch but also French and German colonial settlers who first came to the country in the 17th century.

Afrikaners were at the heart of the apartheid system of white minority rule from 1948-1994, leading to decades of hostility between them and South Africa’s Black majority. But Afrikaners are not a homogenous group, and some fought against apartheid. There are an estimated 2.7 million Afrikaners in South Africa’s population of 62 million.

Afrikaners are divided over Trump’s claims. Some say they face discrimination, but a group of leading Afrikaner business figures and academics said in an open letter last month that “the narrative that casts Afrikaners as victims of racial persecution in post-apartheid South Africa” is misleading.

Afrikaners’ Dutch-derived language is widely spoken in South Africa and is one of the country’s 12 official languages. Afrikaners are represented in every aspect of society. Afrikaners are some of South Africa’s richest entrepreneurs and some of its most successful sports stars, and also serve in government. Most are largely committed to South Africa’s multiracial democracy.

Trump claims they’re being ‘killed and slaughtered’

Trump asserted that Afrikaners “are being killed and slaughtered, and their land and farms are being illegally confiscated.” The president’s comments are in reference to a relatively small number of attacks on Afrikaner farmers that he and others claim are racially motivated.

Trump has also pointed to a highly contentious law introduced by the South African government that allows land to be appropriated from private owners without compensation. Some Afrikaners fear that law is aimed at removing them from their land in favor of South Africa’s poor Black majority. Many South Africans, including opposition parties, have criticized the law, but it hasn’t led to land confiscations.

Trump first made baseless claims of widespread killing of white South African farmers and land seizures during his first term in response to allegations aired on conservative media personality Tucker Carlson’s former show on Fox News. Trump ordered then-U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to look into the allegations, but nothing came of any investigation.

South Africa rejects the claims

The South African government said in response to Trump’s social media post that his claims were “not substantiated by fact.” It has said that Trump’s criticism of South Africa over Afrikaners is a result of misinformation because it misses the context that Black farmers and farmworkers are also killed in rural attacks, which make up a tiny percentage of the country’s high violent crime rate.

There were more than 26,000 homicides in South Africa in 2024. Of those, 37 were farm murders, according to an Afrikaner lobby group that tracks them. Experts on rural attacks in South Africa have said the overriding motive for the violent farm invasions is robbery and not race.

Other pressure on South Africa

Trump said it is a “total disgrace” that the G20 summit — a meeting of the leaders of the 19 top rich and developing economies, the European Union and the African Union — is being held in South Africa. He had already said he wouldn’t attend, and Vice President JD Vance was due to go in his place. The U.S. will take on the rotating presidency of the G20 after South Africa.

Trump also said in a speech last week that South Africa should be thrown out of the G20.

Trump’s criticism of Africa’s most developed economy has gone beyond the issue of Afrikaners. His executive order in February said South Africa had taken “aggressive positions towards the United States and its allies,” specifically with its decision to accuse Israel of genocide against Palestinians in Gaza at the United Nations’ top court.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio boycotted a G20 foreign ministers meeting in South Africa in February after deriding the host country’s G20 slogan of “solidarity, equality and sustainability” as “DEI and climate change.”

Millions of Venezuelans Join Volunteer Militias as US Attacks Continue

November 8, 2025 

Answering the call of the government of President Nicolás Maduro, people sign up to join Venezuela's civil militias at a square in Caracas, the capital, on Aug. 23, 2025. Photo: Ariana Cubillos/AP Photo.

Following a decade of economic sanctions on Venezuela, the current wave of boat strikes isn’t actually aimed at stopping drug trafficking.

CARACAS, Venezuela – At the Fort Tiuna military base in Venezuela’s capital, people of varied ages and physical conditions take target practice. They swing across rivers on ropes, dash and hide between mounds and climb trees to analyze the terrain. They are some of the over 8 million Venezuelans who have no military experience, but who have voluntarily enlisted in the Bolivarian National Militia in case President Donald Trump decides to attack their country.

On Sept. 29, the Venezuelan government signed a decree of “external commotion,” to be activated in the event of any aggression against the country. The emergency measure would grant special powers of national administration and defense for a renewable 90-day period. The announcement of the measure was accompanied by large-scale military exercises in La Orchila, an island military base off the Venezuelan coast, involving thousands of soldiers and militia members in joint naval and aerial maneuvers. President Nicolás Maduro also recently highlighted the power of Venezuela’s Igla-S arsenal, a portable air defense system designed by Russia to shoot down low-altitude aircraft, helicopters and drones.

Venezuela is responding to U.S. strikes against civilian boats in its coastal waters. In late August, the U.S. government ordered a massive deployment to the Caribbean Sea that included guided missile destroyers, amphibious assault ships, a nuclear submarine and more than 4,500 Marines, and 10 F-35 stealth fighters stationed in Puerto Rico. With the cost of its military operations in the Caribbean estimated at $18 million per day, the U.S. government has announced that an aircraft carrier with another group of destroyers would join this contingent “soon.”

Since Sept. 2, the United States has attacked 15 vessels in the Caribbean and eastern Pacific, killing 64 crew members whose names and nationalities are unknown. The Trump administration argues that its ships are on an “official mission to combat drug trafficking” and alleged cartels linked to the Venezuelan government, but hasn’t provided any proof that the attacked vessels were trafficking drugs.

In addition to these lethal attacks — described by Venezuela’s ambassador to the United Nations, Samuel Moncada, as extrajudicial killings — there have been provocations involving U.S. warplanes entering Venezuelan airspace. Trump stated that the United States is evaluating potential “attacks on land-based targets” in Venezuelan territory and he confirmed he had authorized the CIA to conduct covert operations in Venezuela.

Experts assert in several media outlets that this deployment — the largest in the region in over half a century — actually aims to destabilize and eventually overthrow Maduro. During his first term, Trump stated that “all options are on the table.” Now, when questioned about whether he seeks “regime change,” he has said, “We’ll see what happens.”

The current scenario is very different from 2019, when opposition legislator Juan Guaidó swore himself in as “interim president” of Venezuela and his unelected leadership was recognized by 60 countries, including the U.S. Six years later, the opposition no longer has a “parallel” government, and Trump claims he does not know who opposition leader, and recent Nobel Peace Prize winner, María Corina Machado is. The opposition’s presidential candidate, Edmundo González, is in exile in Spain.

Essentially, the United States has increased its direct threat against Venezuela, but without a visible and organized opposition force to support it. The last time the opposition called for a protest, in January, the turnout was well below their expectations, and there has been no active public protest movement since.

In Bolívar Square in Caracas there is a relaxed, festive atmosphere despite the current hostilities. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim)

“After 2019, we saw a much more diplomatic and media-driven offensive against Venezuela. The international media talked about Venezuela daily for two years,” Ociel Alí López, a sociologist and professor at the Central University of Venezuela, tells Truthdig. “That is not the case now. Today, Venezuela is not in the spotlight, but now there is a real military threat.”

López highlights the changes in the region, with the Colombian and Brazilian governments opposing a military attack on Venezuela, and Venezuela now maintaining commercial ties with the U.S. via a license granted to Chevron to extract and export Venezuela’s oil.

Venezuela doesn’t produce illegal drugs

Washington justifies its deadly attacks on Venezuelan boats with the allegation that the boats carry narcotics, and has put forward the theory that the rise in overdose deaths in the U.S. constitutes an “armed attack” by cartels, pointing the finger at Venezuela to justify the use of lethal force. However, the data doesn’t support the notion of Venezuela as a narco-terrorist threat.

The overdose crisis in the United States is primarily based on the consumption of fentanyl, and much of the illicit fentanyl comes from Mexico, with precursor chemicals legally supplied by companies based in China. As for cocaine, Venezuela is not a producer country, and the Caribbean Sea route has accounted for only a tiny proportion of the cocaine flow into the United States.

“The figures provided by the United Nations, the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration itself, and so-called independent studies within the United States, state that between 80% and 90% of the cocaine that reaches the country comes via the Pacific,” María Fernanda Barreto, a Colombian Venezuelan political analyst, tells Truthdig.

In the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime reports from 1999 to 2025, Venezuela does not appear as a country of significance in the realm of illicit drugs, narcotics or stimulants. Not even the DEA’s 2024 annual report mentions Venezuela.

Pino Arlacchi, the former secretary-general of the U.N. office, stated that the U.S.’ real goal is to seize control of Venezuela’s oil reserves, the largest in the world. It’s also worth asking, as Venezuelan Vice President Delcy Rodríguez did, why did Venezuela’s anti-drug performance improve after the DEA was expelled from the country in 2005?

U.S. institutions also play a key role in managing the drug trade, Barreto argues, saying, “U.S. banks launder the capital.” Indeed, banks such as HSBC, Wells Fargo and TD Bank have received record fines for their involvement in laundering money from drug trafficking.

Life for ordinary Venezuelans

Two distinct moods are palpable on the streets of Venezuela: tension mixed with fear, and disinterest tinged with disbelief. Despite this, people are also continuing with everyday life, participating in celebrations of the beatification of Venezuela’s first saints, José Gregorio Hernández and Carmen Rendiles, and planning their Christmas festivities. Most are at least as concerned about the cost of preparing our traditional Christmas dishes as they are about speculating over Trump’s intentions.

The sudden military pressure from the U.S. only compounds the effects of a decade of economic and media-based attacks. The U.S.’ unilateral sanctions, especially on the country’s oil industry, have led to extreme hardship. In 2021, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on unilateral coercive measures, Alena Douhan, warned that, due to the sanctions, food availability had decreased by 73%; 180,000 surgeries could not be performed due to a lack of antibiotics or anesthesia; 2.6 million children were deprived of vaccines for meningitis, rotavirus, malaria, measles, yellow fever and influenza; and 80,000 HIV/AIDS patients had to suspend their treatment.

This has forced Venezuela to develop its local production capacity, and it is now able to produce 97% of the food it consumes, while domestic medicine manufacturing has reached 80%. But even if the basics are available now, people often lack the means to acquire them, with many working multiple jobs or struggling to save amid persistent inflation.

The Venezuelan government has had to perform a difficult balancing act in its attempt to stabilize the economy. Since October last year, the Central Bank of Venezuela (BCV) has been progressively devaluing the national currency. The exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and the bolivar has increased from 1 to 40 to over 1 to 200 over the past year — a loss of 80% of the bolivar’s value.

The exchange rate has also been affected by the terms of a new license issued to Chevron at the end of July that allows the company to operate in Venezuela but limits its payments in foreign currency. In this regard, the amount of foreign currency that the BCV has provided through its foreign exchange desks is 32.26% lower than last year, likely due to limited international reserves.

López said the U.S. military attacks have forced the government to allocate resources to defense, reducing the amount of foreign currency available for the rest of the economy. “The gap between the official exchange rate and the parallel rate is almost 50%. That is having a tremendous effect on prices, especially on food,” he added.

Since August, the price of meat in Caracas stores jumped from $9.80 per kilo to at least $15 per kilo. In addition, public transportation fares, which had been frozen since April, rose by 60%.

In the Guaicaipuro Market in Caracas, people are starting to shop for end-of-year festivities. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim)

Tony Boza, an economist and United Socialist Party of Venezuela legislator, believes the Venezuelan economy is suffering the consequences of dollarization and the government’s “monetarist vision.” While he acknowledges that the U.S. sanctions have hit the oil industry and isolated the country, he maintains that current policies prioritize inflation control over the well-being of the majority.

“According to figures from some private analysts — because the BCV does not publish them — the size of our current economy is around $140 billion, but the current liquidity is less than 3%,” Boza tells Truthdig. “At the worst moment, which was in 1950, the liquidity in circulation was equivalent to 10% of GDP.”

According to Boza, the focus on reducing liquidity to prevent inflation is leading to low wages and pensions. The monthly minimum wage in Venezuela is less than one U.S. dollar, and most income is received as bonuses. Pensioners get about $50 a month in bonuses, for example. Since May 1, public sector workers have been receiving $160 a month, which mostly comes from the Economic War Bonus.

Furthermore, Boza points out that the distribution of foreign currency by the BCV is a nontransparent mechanism. “We don’t know if the U.S. dollars are being given to businesspeople who bring in supplies for their production or to shell companies that speculate and create the exchange rate gap,” he says.

The legislator from Zulia state argues that the Venezuelan government has “neglected” fundamental issues such as the distribution of wealth.

“The publication of the Gini coefficient was discontinued because wages are the pivot point for wealth distribution and have an impact not only on the public sector but also on the private sector,” he says. In his view, in economic terms and within this context of growing external pressure, the country is experiencing a “free-for-all” that the government must correct.

People and government act in response to the U.S. boat strikes

The government has sought to project an image of stability conducive to foreign investment. But now, as it prepares to protect its sovereignty, its attention has turned to defense and diplomacy. Venezuela convened an emergency meeting of the United Nations Security Council and over the past few weeks, countries like Russia and China, as well as multilateral organizations like the Non-Aligned Movement, have condemned the United States’ attacks. One Russian legislator reportedly said on Tuesday that his country has sent air defense systems to Venezuela.

Domestically, the Maduro government has focused on a mobilization campaign and says a total of 8.2 million Venezuelans participated in the first two days of military readiness activities for the Bolivarian Militia, a voluntary corps that complements the conventional armed forces. The militia was initially created in 2005 as the National Reserve, then in 2009 it took on its current name.

Anaís Márquez, a spokesperson for the 5 de Marzo Comandante Eterno Commune in Caracas and a member of the National Directorate of the Communes Union, tells Truthdig that the organized grassroots, including militias and commune members, are ready for what may come.

Anaís Márquez, a spokesperson for the 5 de Marzo Comandante Eterno Commune in Caracas, said Venezuelan volunteers “are preparing ourselves both physically and psychologically” for a possible U.S. invasion. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim) 

Anaís Márquez, a spokesperson for the 5 de Marzo Comandante Eterno Commune in Caracas, said Venezuelan volunteers “are preparing ourselves both physically and psychologically” for a possible U.S. invasion. (Jessica Dos Santos Jardim)

“We have answered the call from our president, we have enlisted, and we are preparing ourselves both physically and psychologically,” she says. “This is a new kind of war against Venezuela … and we cannot deny that it has us on edge, but we trust in a government that has known how to be strategic and stand its ground.”

Márquez said that the volunteers hold “physical preparedness” drills every Saturday at Fort Tiuna, one of the best-known military bases in Caracas. “These exercises are open to all who wish to participate, but those who are most aware of what is happening are the ones who attend. And, the psychological preparation focuses on workshops to debunk the fake news that is generated, especially on social media.”

In her opinion, “If they were to try and take Venezuela by land,” the organized grassroots would deploy as the final line of defense. “We are not fully prepared, but we are working on it.” However, Márquez rejects the way Trump and some media outlets have mocked the Venezuelan people, especially the women in the communes and militia.

She says the majority of the Venezuelan people want “our country to remain a territory of peace, where one works to achieve dreams,” and that only some members of the opposition advocate for military intervention.

National private polling firms like Datanálisis show that, although a sector of the Venezuelan population wants political change, only 3% would support a foreign military intervention.

(Truthdig)

Jessica Dos Santos

Jessica Dos Santos is a journalist at Radio del Sur and a writer for the web portal 15yUltimo and Épale CCS magazine. She is the author of the book “Caracas en Alpargatas” (2018) and a university professor. She’s won the Aníbal Nazoa Journalism Prize in 2014 and received honorable mentions in the Simón Bolívar National Journalism prize in 2016 and 2018.

President Maduro Calls on CELAC Summit to Condemn Militarization of Caribbean

November 10, 2025 

Photo composition showing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro with the logo of the CELAC-EU Summit in Santa Marta, Colombia. Photo: Venezuela News.

Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro addressed a letter to the leaders of the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) meeting in Santa Marta, Colombia, calling for a unified continental response to the US military deployment in the Caribbean that has already caused nearly 70 civilian deaths at sea.

“The principle at stake today is clear and decisive: the sovereignty of states and the free self-determination of peoples. Venezuela declares this with absolute clarity: it does not accept and will not accept any tutelage. We do not accept that under euphemisms such as ‘security’ or the ‘war on drugs,’ the old Monroe Doctrine be imposed, seeking to turn our America into a stage for invasions and ‘regime change’ coups to steal our immense wealth and natural resources,” the Venezuelan president wrote in the letter.

Addressing those gathered at the site where Simón Bolívar delivered his last proclamation in 1830, Maduro drew a historical parallel between the Spanish reconquest expedition of 1815—commanded by Pablo Morillo with 10,000 men and 60 ships—and the current deployment of aircraft carriers, missile destroyers, and nuclear submarines in Caribbean waters.

“The forms of siege have changed, but not its essence,” President Maduro noted, linking the two episodes separated by two centuries. The letter, dated November 9, 2024, articulates a direct critique of US military strikes that UN experts and the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights have described as extrajudicial executions.

UN Security Council

President Maduro pointed out that these allegations were presented before the United Nations Security Council, where, according to the president, the United States acknowledged its crimes. The seriousness of the accusations contrasts sharply with the official justification of these operations under the pretext of security and the fight against drug trafficking.

Maduro condemned what he considers a resurgence of the Monroe Doctrine, formulated in 1823, which proclaimed US hegemony over the American continent. In response, he proposed elevating the “Bolivarian Doctrine” as the guiding principle of regional independence.

The letter recalled fragments of the Jamaica Letter of 1815, in which Simón Bolívar defined Latin American identity as “an intermediate species between the legitimate owners of the land and the Spanish usurpers,” emphasizing the mestizo condition as the foundation of sovereignty.

CELAC as an instrument of autonomy

The Venezuelan president recalled that CELAC was founded in Caracas in December 2011, with the participation of 33 heads of state, as a regional alternative that excludes the United States and Canada. He quoted former president Hugo Chávez, who proclaimed at the time that “only unity will make us free.”

President Maduro’s letter makes four specific demands: to reiterate the proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, to categorically repudiate the militarization of the Caribbean, to demand an independent investigation of the US extrajudicial executions, and to establish regional mechanisms for humanitarian cooperation and collective defense.

President Maduro reiterated his condemnation of the blockade against Cuba, calling it “criminal and inhumane,” and condemned the island’s inclusion on the US list of countries that allegedly sponsor terrorism. He extended his criticism to the European Union’s sanctions, arguing that they result in the violation of fundamental rights via individual measures.

Call on CELAC to condemn the militarization of the Caribbean

The letter invokes three foundational moments of Bolivarian thought: the Jamaica Letter (1815), the Congress of Angostura (1819), and the Amphictyonic Congress of Panama (1826), the latter hindered by US imperial interests.

“Let us not allow the pettiness of external powers or the ambition of some oligarchies to divide us,” Maduro wrote, calling for the summit to transcend “the ritual exercise” and become “an act of firmness.”

CELAC-EU summit

With a call to revitalize biregional dialogue amid a complex political climate, the fourth summit between the CELAC and the EU opened in Colombia on Sunday. The meeting, held at the Santa Marta Convention Center, aims to strengthen strategic cooperation between the two blocs and establish a common roadmap for the next two years.

Despite the absence of some heads of state and the political tensions spreading through the region, the summit is taking place with the participation of over 60 delegations, reflecting the shared interest in keeping channels of dialogue and cooperation open.

The central focus of the meeting revolves around energy, digital, and environmental transition, with an agenda aimed at addressing global challenges such as climate change, the technological gap, and sustainable productive transformation.

International relations experts said President Maduro did not attend the summit due to security concerns, noting that the US government’s military and intelligence agencies have a strong presence in Colombia. The experts also cited the US government’s announcement of a $50 million bounty for the Venezuelan president last August. In his place, Venezuela’s Foreign Minister Yván Gil joined the summit on Sunday afternoon.

(Telesur) with Orinoco Tribune content

Civilian Death Toll Rises to 75 in US SOUTHCOM’s Killing Spree

November 10, 2025 

One of the two small boats struck by the US military in the Eastern Pacific, leaving three victims dead on November 9, 2025. Photo: X/@SecWar.

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Monday, US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth reported that the US regime bombed two ships in the Pacific Ocean the previous day. He did not specify the precise locations or near which countries’ coasts the strikes occurred.

The information was disclosed in a social media post, where Hegseth stressed that the attacks were ordered by the US president, Donald Trump. The post copied what has become a shadowy template used to inform about these United Nations-labeled extrajudicial killings.

Hegseth stated that the small boats “were known by our intelligence to be associated with illicit narcotics smuggling, were carrying narcotics, and were transiting along a known narco-trafficking transit route in the Eastern Pacific.” He presented no evidence beyond a blurred video showing the moment of the bombing.

He later confessed to the killings, noting that six civilians were murdered because they were presumed to be drug traffickers: “Both strikes were conducted in international waters and 3 male narco-terrorists were aboard each vessel. All 6 were killed. No US forces were harmed.”

Many analysts wonder why the US continues to report that no US troops were harmed, given that the strikes are conducted by drones or missiles against small boats that pose no imminent threat.

These bombings coincide with the US regime’s deployment of troops to the Caribbean Sea under the “war on drugs” argument. They were initiated days after the US Department of Justice raised the bounty against Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to US$50 million.

The Trump administration has attempted to portray Venezuela as a narco-state, claiming President Maduro heads the nonexistent Cartel de los Soles, the Tren de Aragua criminal gang, and even the Sinaloa Cartel. On numerous occasions, United Nations reports have demonstrated that Venezuela plays only a marginal role in this multinational crime.

The nationalities of those killed on Sunday are officially unknown, as the US does not provide records or details of its controversial military operations. Among those reported killed in previous attacks were natives of Trinidad and Tobago, Colombia, and Venezuela, along with an Ecuadorian survivor.

So far, 75 civilians have been assassinated during this US Southern Command killing spree, which began in early September. Officials have reported 19 strikes against 23 small boats, as summarized in the table below.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

Venezuela Begins Election of 264,000 Local Committees for National Defense

November 9, 2025 

People's assembly to choose CBBI's members in Carupano, Sucre state, November 8, 2025. Photo: IG/@partidopsuv.

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—Popular assemblies convened by the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) have begun electing members for the Bolivarian Comprehensive Base Committees (CBBI) in more than 264,000 streets across Venezuela. The process that started on Saturday, November 8, is scheduled to finish on November 16.

In a video on social media, President Nicolás Maduro highlighted the importance of this new collective structure, which will replace street leaders within the ruling party and has a national defense responsibility amid unprecedented US military threats.

“I propose that we take a leap and that those 264,000 streets of the country immediately form the CBBI, a collective, team structure, of no less than nine members who take the oath, the commitment to develop Bolivarian values, the direction, the leadership and the preparation for the integral defense of the homeland and for the exercise of power,” the president wrote.

The Venezuelan president explained that each CBBI will have leadership but will function as a team with a permanent work agenda and action plan. He said that their priorities will include education, comprehensive preparation for defense, and organizing revolutionary, Bolivarian and socialist families at the grassroots level in their territory.

“We are referring to about 2.5 million men and women at the grassroots level, working, organizing, and leading our people in the depths of our national identity,” he said earlier this week during the plenary session of the 5th PSUV Congress.

During the same event, President Maduro sent a message to the entire PSUV structure: “I send an embrace of gratitude to all the street leaders of the UBCH community and to all the work teams who are the reason for our existence and are a pillar of peace and a guarantee of combat in the territory.”

According to PSUV General Secretary Diosdado Cabello, each CBBI will be made up of nine members elected directly by their community’s residents. A regulation approved by the PSUV congress states that only citizens from each street can participate, “without outside interference” from public officials, party members or anyone else outside the community, as reported on Con el Mazo Dando.

The assemblies to elect the members will be held on November 8, 9, 15 and 16.

States such as Apure, Aragua, Cojedes, Guarico, Lara, Nueva Esparta, Portuguesa, Carabobo, Sucre, and Barinas participated massively in the process, as seen from images shared on social media by the PSUV.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff

Zone of Peace, Gaza Genocide, Cuba Blockade: CELAC-EU Declaration Plagued by Objections From US Allies

November 10, 2025 

Group photo of the 4th CELAC-EU Summit held in Santa Marta, Colombia, on November 9-10, 2025. Photo: European Council.

Caracas (OrinocoTribune.com)—On Sunday, the Fourth Summit between the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) and the European Union (EU) issued a joint declaration. The 52-paragraph document was signed by 32 of the 33 CELAC countries. Venezuela was the only country that decided not to sign it.

At the end of the document, seven countries—Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Panama, Paraguay, and Trinidad and Tobago—presented formal objections to critical paragraphs. They distanced themselves from positions reaffirming the region as a Zone of Peace, condemning the genocide in Gaza, and demanding an end to the economic blockade against Cuba, among others.

The declaration also includes paragraph number 14 regarding the Ukrainian conflict, which appears to respond more to the interests of the European Union than to those of the Latin American countries. It was not questioned by any of the signatories.

This diplomatic maneuver coincides with the agenda of countries that have subordinated themselves to the United States’ foreign policy in recent months, seeking to weaken the unified position of Latin America and the Caribbean against foreign intervention.

The footnotes on the final declaration read as follows:

• Argentina dissociates from paragraphs 10, 15, 18, 42, 44, the reference to “gender” in paragraph 9, the reference to “Pact for the Future” in paragraph 20, and the reference to “Agenda 2030 and its 17 Sustainable Development Goals SDGs” in paragraph 22.

• Costa Rica dissociates from paragraphs 10 and 18.

• Ecuador dissociates from paragraphs 10, 15, and 18.

• El Salvador dissociates from paragraphs 10 and 18.

• Panama dissociates from paragraphs 10 and 15.

• Paraguay dissociates from paragraphs 10, 15, 18, 20, 22, and 44.

• Trinidad and Tobago dissociates from paragraph 10 and the reference to “We reiterate the importance of regional migration dialogue frameworks” in paragraph 47.

Paragraphs 10, 15, and 18 were the most objected to by the group of countries that currently serve as partners of the United States in the region.

Venezuela has not yet made any comments about its decision not to sign the final declaration. However, many analysts speculate that the reasons might be partly due to a possible clause that Venezuela might have wanted to incorporate without success.

Paragraph 10 is about the Zone of Peace and reads as follows:

Noting that CELAC has declared itself as a Zone of Peace, committed to the settlement of disputes through dialogue and cooperation in accordance with international law, we recognize the ongoing efforts to achieve peace in the region, highlighting our support for the peace process in Colombia with the backing of the international community and the United Nations. We discussed the importance of maritime security and regional stability in the Caribbean. We agreed on the importance of international cooperation, mutual respect, and full compliance with international law, including in combating transnational organized crime and drug trafficking. Several CELAC member States emphasized their national positions regarding the situation in the Caribbean and the Pacific. We reiterate our commitment to strengthening mechanisms for dialogue, coordination, and technical assistance to jointly address these challenges.

As can be seen, this paragraph is a reiteration of a fundamental CELAC principle referring to the Zone of Peace, aiming to resolve disputes through dialogue. It emphasized its “support for the peace process in Colombia,” while keeping the region a war-free zone. It was rejected by Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, Panama, Paraguay, and Trinidad and Tobago.

The refusal to endorse this paragraph comes amid a growing US militarization of the region, a situation condemned during the summit by Venezuelan Foreign Minister Yván Gil. By distancing themselves from this paragraph, these governments tacitly legitimize the presence of US forces in the region and the killing spree that has already taken the lives of 75 civilians from various countries.

Paragraph 15, dedicated to the Israeli genocide in Gaza, reads as follows:

We recognize the agreement reached on the first phase of the Comprehensive Plan to end the Gaza Conflict, as well as the outcome of the Sharm el-Sheikh Summit for Peace, held on 13 October 2025. In this regard, we recall the High-Level Conference for the Peaceful Settlement of the Question of Palestine and the Implementation of the Two-State Solution, held in New York. We reiterate our unequivocal condemnation of the October 7, 2023, terrorist attacks. We reiterate our firm condemnation of the escalation of violence in the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, following the increased settler violence, the expansion of illegal settlements, and Israel’s military operation. We call on all parties to fully commit to implementing all phases of the Plan and to refrain from any actions that could jeopardize the agreement. To alleviate the dire humanitarian situation, we call for immediate, unimpeded access and sustained distribution of humanitarian aid at scale into and throughout Gaza. All parties must comply with international law, including international humanitarian law. We reiterate our strong commitment to a comprehensive, just, and lasting peace, in accordance with the relevant United Nations Security Council resolutions, based on the two-state solution. We also reaffirm our commitment to the reconstruction and recovery of Gaza.

Many analysts criticize that this paragraph did not label Israeli operations in Palestine as a genocide, despite the murder of over 65,000 Palestinians, and supports a two-state solution that is heavily repudiated by many in West Asia. However, even with the diplomatically neutral shape it took, the paragraph was rejected by Argentina, Ecuador, Panama, and Paraguay.

This stance aligns those countries with the position of Washington, Israel’s main ally and financier, distancing them from the global consensus demanding a just peace in the region.

Paragraph 18, dedicated to the US blockade of Cuba, reads as follows:

The countries that supported the United Nations General Assembly Resolution A/RES/80/7 of 29 October 2025, reiterate the need to put an end to the economic, commercial, and financial embargo imposed against Cuba, as well as their opposition to laws and regulations with extraterritorial effects. The designation of Cuba as a state sponsor of terrorism, and its continuation on the list, has introduced obstacles to international financial transactions with the island.

In an extremely diplomatic tone, the paragraph calls attention to the illegal US blockade of Cuba and the illegal US sanctions. It was rejected, however, by Argentina, Costa Rica, Ecuador, El Salvador, and Paraguay.

This rejection shows their support towards an illegal US suffocation of Cuba that has caused hardship to the Cuban people for over six decades, and has been overwhelmingly condemned year after year in the UN General Assembly.

Other Objections

Argentina’s position caused tension over its objection to the term “gender equality” in paragraph 9, which reiterated a basic diplomatic, human rights defense script. This shows that the internal condemnation in Argentina against President Javier Milei’s misogyny is not unfounded.

Argentina and Paraguay also rejected paragraph 44, which recognized the advance of the EU-LAC Digital Alliance and referred to satellite connectivity. Some analysts speculate that there might be internal interests in these countries against these initiatives.

Lastly, it is worth mentioning that Trinidad and Tobago rejected a section of paragraph 48—incorrectly numbered as 47 in the document—due to the phrase: “We reiterate the importance of regional frameworks of migration dialogue.”

This paragraph highlighted the importance of cooperation on migration issues. The Trinidadian position only reinforces the xenophobic stance of Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar toward migration, especially that from Venezuela.

Despite the controversial rejections in the final declaration, many analysts consider it a victory that the majority of countries, despite not being overly friendly with the Venezuelan government, are concerned about an escalation of violence in the region.

Special for Orinoco Tribune by staff