Friday, April 10, 2009

US Judge Allows Apartheid-era Cases Seeking Damages From Multi-National Corporations That Conducted Business in Racist South Africa

US judge says apartheid suits against firms can go ahead


South African victims of apartheid got the go ahead in the United States this week to continue their pursuit of damage payments from five major US and German firms for aiding decades of oppression under white rule.

In two cases that test the reach of the Alien Tort Claims Act, Southern District of New York Judge Shira Scheindlin said cases seeking payouts from Germany's Daimler and Rheinmetall Group and the US-based Ford, General Motors and IBM could go ahead, the website reported on Thursday.

The plaintiffs -- two groups of South Africans -- argue that the firms supported apartheid by selling vehicles, weapons, computer equipment and other items to the regime.

In South Africa, human rights groups welcomed the decision. But Marjorie Dobson of the Khulumani Support Group said that it would appeal the judge's dismissal of cases against international banks.

Scheindlin, who made the rulings on Wednesday, warned that there were limits on the rights of the plaintiffs, which include tens of thousands of South Africans who want payment for their suffering.

Nonetheless, Michael Hausfeld, lawyer for the apartheid victims in New York, greeted the ruling as representing "great progress".

Jan Tjan, a US spokesperson for Daimler, called the charges against his firm unjustified.

"We are confident that this will be decided in our interest," he said.

The cases had been originally rejected by US courts, but were revived under appeal. The US State Department objected to the cases out of concern they could damage South African-US relations.

Scheindlin narrowed the cases, putting the brake on some of the charges, including that some of them were directly involved in killings. She also dismissed some cases.

Scheindlin conceded that the "commission of inhumane acts" that sustained the brutal regime was "indisputably a tort under customary international law".

But she added that private firms could not be made responsible for all of apartheid's ills, saying the international legal system "has not thus far definitively established liability for non-state actors who follow or even further state-sponsored racial oppression".

Scheindlin found that the plaintiffs' lawyers had adequately made their point that Daimler, Ford and General Motors and their security personnel were "intimately involved" in several torture cases. The companies also knew equipment sold to the regime was being used to oppress the black majority.

Along the same lines, Scheindlin found that the IBM case could proceed because it knew its computers and software were being used to "register individuals, strip them of their citizenship, and segregate them in particular areas of South Africa".

The case against Rheinmetall Group, which will also go forward, argues that the German company aided and abetted extrajudicial killing and apartheid through the sale of weapons to South African security forces.

Scheindlin put the brake on cases that argued more serious charges against Daimler, Ford and GM -- that they were directly involved in killings -- but left it open to being pleaded anew.

Similar claims that IBM and Japan's Fujitsu were involved in killings and torture were dismissed.

The judge also dismissed claims against Barclays Bank for job discrimination and against Britain's Barclays and the Swiss UBS for loaning money and backing the purchase of South African defence forces bonds, reported.

Under US law, non-American citizens are allowed to go to court against companies that have a foothold in the US, as long as they can prove that international human rights law has been violated. – Sapa-DPA

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address:

Friday, April 10, 2009
05:58 Mecca time, 02:58 GMT

US court allows apartheid cases

General Motors is one of the companies set to face legal action

A US court has ruled that victims of South Africa's apartheid-era government can sue General Motors, IBM and other corporations accused of complicity in human rights abuses.

A federal judge in New York ruled on Wednesday that joint actions against the corporations under a US law allowing rights claims from abroad should be addressed in a US court.

Car-makers Ford and Daimler and defence firm Rheinmetall are the other companies set to face legal action from South African plaintiffs.

However, Judge Shira Scheindlin also dismissed claims against banks UBS and Barclays but allowed the plaintiffs the opportunity to refile their case against electronics firm Fujitsu.

Michael Hausfeld, one of the lawyers representing the South African plaintiffs, said the verdict was "a major advancement in international law".

Torture claims

The lawsuits argue that the car-makers knew their vehicles were being used by South African forces to violently suppress protests.

They also claim that IBM and Fujitsu knew their computers were being used by South Africa's white minority government to help strip black citizens of their rights.

Apartheid ended in 1994 when South Africa held its first free elections, bringing Nelson Mandela and the African National Congress to power.

The judge disagreed with arguments made by the companies that it was not their responsibility to tell clients how to use their products.

"That level of wilful blindness in the face of crimes in violation of the law of nations cannot defeat an otherwise clear showing of knowledge that the assistance IBM provided would directly and substantially support apartheid," she said.

Scheindlen allowed lawsuits against IBM for "aiding and abetting arbitrary denationalisation and apartheid".

She said that the plaintiffs could pursue claims against Daimler, GM and Ford "for aiding and abetting torture... extrajudicial killing, and apartheid".

And against Rheinmetall, the German parent company of Swiss-based arms manufacturer Oerlikon, for "aiding and abetting extrajudicial killing and apartheid".

Khulumani, a South African organisation that helps apartheid victims and is one of the plaintiffs in the court action, hailed the court decision.

"We are convinced that this lawsuit, should it be successful, will go a long way in satisfying members' material needs; and that will go a long way in contributing to social reconciliation," said Marjorie Jobson, a Khulumani director.

Source: Agencies

No comments: