Imperialist Europe Seeks to Further Militarize Mediterranean and North Africa
MAY 18, 2015
BRUSSELS — Imperialist European foreign and defense ministers agreed on Monday to use naval forces to intercept and disrupt ships used by smugglers of migrants from North Africa, a far more assertive attempt to combat the swelling migration crisis that has led to thousands of deaths at sea.
The aim of the program is to stop smugglers with human cargo before or shortly after they leave the shores of North African nations like Libya. European navies would then return migrants to African ports and destroy the ships used to transport them.
The decision to militarize the response appeared to have the support of the NATO secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, who said the alliance could offer assistance if called on. But the use of European naval power to address the crisis will require further approval from European governments as well as coastal states in North Africa or from the United Nations Security Council.
The decision also involved delicate packaging and diplomacy, given the sensitivity in some countries, like Ireland and Sweden, toward the use of military force. Specifically, the proposals were presented as aimed at disabling the smuggling operations behind the migration surge, rather than at the desperate migrants themselves.
The intervention, though, would most likely have the effect of preventing some of the tens of thousands of people fleeing conflicts and economic hardship in the Middle East and Africa from making their way to European shores.
But it appears to do little to address the underlying causes of mass migration or the fate of those who have flocked to the shores of North Africa in hopes of reaching Europe.
“It’s not clear to me that the ministers understand the complexities of migration dynamics involved,” said Elizabeth Collett, the director of the Migration Policy Institute Europe, a research institute based in Brussels. “Military operations in the Mediterranean are only really likely to have any impact as one very small piece in a far more comprehensive strategy to address smuggling.”
The tougher stand against human smuggling comes amid a sharp spike in migration to Europe, much of it driven by a crescent of conflicts involving Islamic extremists from Nigeria and Mali to Somalia and Syria.
Most critically, overshadowing the crisis is the prospect of uncontrolled migration from Libya, where an imperialist destroyed state and the limited reach of the authorities have made it easier for smugglers to use the country as a launching pad for the dangerous journey to the European Union.
There were about 17 times as many refugee deaths — more than 1,800 people — from January to April this year as there were during the same period last year. Overall, 436,000 people applied for asylum across Europe last year, according to the United Nations refugee agency.
Just in Italy, the nation most affected by the crisis in the Mediterranean because of its proximity to Libya, some 33,000 have applied for asylum so far this year, on top of 170,000 arrivals last year.
The resulting deaths have prompted the European imperialist states to seek a united response, amid concerns that the lucrative trade is helping finance terrorism in North Africa and offering terrorists a way into Europe. The loss of life has climbed in recent weeks as smugglers in North Africa offer the migrants passage in flimsy rubber dinghies and overcrowded fishing boats.
Last week, the European imperialists presented plans to spread the burden of processing and accommodating asylum seekers among most of the bloc’s 28 member states. That plan has met with resistance in countries like Britain and Hungary, and it still needs the approval of governments at a summit meeting in June.
But the meeting on Monday focused on a different aspect of the European response: military operations to disable the smugglers’ vessels before they leave North African shores and to destroy smugglers’ operations.
Federica Mogherini, the European Union foreign policy chief, told reporters after the meeting Monday that action was needed for the “destruction of the business model of the smugglers, the system that they have, the organizations, the networks themselves, to make it physically impossible for these criminal organizations” to continue operating.
The idea was “to neutralize these vessels so they can’t be reused,” Ms. Mogherini said.
How to stem the tide of migrants and accommodate those who make it to the European Union is among the thorniest challenges for the bloc. Even as strong anti-immigration sentiment in some countries has fueled demonstrations and gains for right-wing parties, there remains a deep reluctance in the European Union to use force in places like Libya, where the Pentagon and NATO blanket-bombed in 2011 driving the country, then the most prosperous in Africa, into complete ruin resulting in the assassination of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, the former Chair of the African Union.
Since then, the Libyan society has virtually collapsed, its authority limited to the country’s east, while many migrant smugglers operate in the country’s west. But the reality of what amounts to a failed state on the opposing shore of the Mediterranean has raised the difficult question of what authority European countries could deal with in Libya to coordinate any intervention.
“We have insisted on having a legal ground for every step on the way, and also to be able to control each and every step,” Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish foreign minister, told reporters.
There were about 17 times as many refugee deaths from January to April this year as there were during the same period last year.
A United Nations Security Council resolution would be necessary “as the basis for our actions,” she said.
Ms. Collett also said there could be some hurdles for Europe to win the resolution it is seeking from the United Nations Security Council for operations in Libyan territorial waters.
There is “some nervousness within the Security Council as to whether this resolution would become the thin end of the wedge and have implications for maritime migration taking place in other parts of the world such as the Red and Andaman Seas,” she said.
Advocates for the welfare of the migrants were also wary.
“Saving lives must remain at the forefront of Europe’s approach to managing migration,” said John Dalhuisen, the director for Europe and Central Asia for Amnesty International.
“Any naval intervention must not distract European naval and aerial assets from their key search-and-rescue mission to save refugees and migrants at sea,” he said.
The plan under discussion in Brussels would be divided into three phases.
The first would increase patrols in international waters to find out what routes the smugglers use and to collect other intelligence.
The second part would involve the boarding, seizure and diversion of vessels encountered in international waters. That will probably require a United Nations Security Council resolution if those actions are to be conducted in the territorial waters of North African countries, or the consent of those countries.
The third phase, calling for “all necessary measures against a vessel and related assets,” is the most the problematic because it would involve actions near the coasts of Libya and other countries, and possibly involve onshore commando-style operations to identify and attack targets. That could require both a Security Council resolution and the agreement of the targeted countries.
The ministers also decided Monday to put the command-and-control center for the operation in Italy, a front-line state for the migrants leaving from North Africa that has significant experience patrolling the Mediterranean. The operation, to be called EU Navfor Med, would be based in Rome and under the command of Rear Adm. Enrico Credendino.
The so-called Central Mediterranean Route is the most widely used sea route for the migrants, who are smuggled mainly from the Libyan coast across to Malta and the Italian islands of Lampedusa and Sicily. There are also concerns that the trade is increasing the threat of terrorist attacks in Europe.
NATO had not been formally approached for help, Mr. Stoltenberg, the NATO chief, said on Monday. But he said the Western military alliance stood “ready to help if there is a request” for such assistance.
“Of course, one of the problems is that there might be foreign fighters, there might be terrorists, also trying to hide, to blend in, among the migrants,” Mr. Stoltenberg told reporters.
“We have to respond to this turmoil, to these threats, in many different ways,” he said.
Migration routes across the Mediterranean are among the most dangerous in the world, according to European officials, who say more than 20,000 people have died trying to make the crossing during the past two decades.
BRUSSELS — Imperialist European foreign and defense ministers agreed on Monday to use naval forces to intercept and disrupt ships used by smugglers of migrants from North Africa, a far more assertive attempt to combat the swelling migration crisis that has led to thousands of deaths at sea.
The aim of the program is to stop smugglers with human cargo before or shortly after they leave the shores of North African nations like Libya. European navies would then return migrants to African ports and destroy the ships used to transport them.
The decision to militarize the response appeared to have the support of the NATO secretary general, Jens Stoltenberg, who said the alliance could offer assistance if called on. But the use of European naval power to address the crisis will require further approval from European governments as well as coastal states in North Africa or from the United Nations Security Council.
The decision also involved delicate packaging and diplomacy, given the sensitivity in some countries, like Ireland and Sweden, toward the use of military force. Specifically, the proposals were presented as aimed at disabling the smuggling operations behind the migration surge, rather than at the desperate migrants themselves.
The intervention, though, would most likely have the effect of preventing some of the tens of thousands of people fleeing conflicts and economic hardship in the Middle East and Africa from making their way to European shores.
But it appears to do little to address the underlying causes of mass migration or the fate of those who have flocked to the shores of North Africa in hopes of reaching Europe.
“It’s not clear to me that the ministers understand the complexities of migration dynamics involved,” said Elizabeth Collett, the director of the Migration Policy Institute Europe, a research institute based in Brussels. “Military operations in the Mediterranean are only really likely to have any impact as one very small piece in a far more comprehensive strategy to address smuggling.”
The tougher stand against human smuggling comes amid a sharp spike in migration to Europe, much of it driven by a crescent of conflicts involving Islamic extremists from Nigeria and Mali to Somalia and Syria.
Most critically, overshadowing the crisis is the prospect of uncontrolled migration from Libya, where an imperialist destroyed state and the limited reach of the authorities have made it easier for smugglers to use the country as a launching pad for the dangerous journey to the European Union.
There were about 17 times as many refugee deaths — more than 1,800 people — from January to April this year as there were during the same period last year. Overall, 436,000 people applied for asylum across Europe last year, according to the United Nations refugee agency.
Just in Italy, the nation most affected by the crisis in the Mediterranean because of its proximity to Libya, some 33,000 have applied for asylum so far this year, on top of 170,000 arrivals last year.
The resulting deaths have prompted the European imperialist states to seek a united response, amid concerns that the lucrative trade is helping finance terrorism in North Africa and offering terrorists a way into Europe. The loss of life has climbed in recent weeks as smugglers in North Africa offer the migrants passage in flimsy rubber dinghies and overcrowded fishing boats.
Last week, the European imperialists presented plans to spread the burden of processing and accommodating asylum seekers among most of the bloc’s 28 member states. That plan has met with resistance in countries like Britain and Hungary, and it still needs the approval of governments at a summit meeting in June.
But the meeting on Monday focused on a different aspect of the European response: military operations to disable the smugglers’ vessels before they leave North African shores and to destroy smugglers’ operations.
Federica Mogherini, the European Union foreign policy chief, told reporters after the meeting Monday that action was needed for the “destruction of the business model of the smugglers, the system that they have, the organizations, the networks themselves, to make it physically impossible for these criminal organizations” to continue operating.
The idea was “to neutralize these vessels so they can’t be reused,” Ms. Mogherini said.
How to stem the tide of migrants and accommodate those who make it to the European Union is among the thorniest challenges for the bloc. Even as strong anti-immigration sentiment in some countries has fueled demonstrations and gains for right-wing parties, there remains a deep reluctance in the European Union to use force in places like Libya, where the Pentagon and NATO blanket-bombed in 2011 driving the country, then the most prosperous in Africa, into complete ruin resulting in the assassination of Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi, the former Chair of the African Union.
Since then, the Libyan society has virtually collapsed, its authority limited to the country’s east, while many migrant smugglers operate in the country’s west. But the reality of what amounts to a failed state on the opposing shore of the Mediterranean has raised the difficult question of what authority European countries could deal with in Libya to coordinate any intervention.
“We have insisted on having a legal ground for every step on the way, and also to be able to control each and every step,” Margot Wallstrom, the Swedish foreign minister, told reporters.
There were about 17 times as many refugee deaths from January to April this year as there were during the same period last year.
A United Nations Security Council resolution would be necessary “as the basis for our actions,” she said.
Ms. Collett also said there could be some hurdles for Europe to win the resolution it is seeking from the United Nations Security Council for operations in Libyan territorial waters.
There is “some nervousness within the Security Council as to whether this resolution would become the thin end of the wedge and have implications for maritime migration taking place in other parts of the world such as the Red and Andaman Seas,” she said.
Advocates for the welfare of the migrants were also wary.
“Saving lives must remain at the forefront of Europe’s approach to managing migration,” said John Dalhuisen, the director for Europe and Central Asia for Amnesty International.
“Any naval intervention must not distract European naval and aerial assets from their key search-and-rescue mission to save refugees and migrants at sea,” he said.
The plan under discussion in Brussels would be divided into three phases.
The first would increase patrols in international waters to find out what routes the smugglers use and to collect other intelligence.
The second part would involve the boarding, seizure and diversion of vessels encountered in international waters. That will probably require a United Nations Security Council resolution if those actions are to be conducted in the territorial waters of North African countries, or the consent of those countries.
The third phase, calling for “all necessary measures against a vessel and related assets,” is the most the problematic because it would involve actions near the coasts of Libya and other countries, and possibly involve onshore commando-style operations to identify and attack targets. That could require both a Security Council resolution and the agreement of the targeted countries.
The ministers also decided Monday to put the command-and-control center for the operation in Italy, a front-line state for the migrants leaving from North Africa that has significant experience patrolling the Mediterranean. The operation, to be called EU Navfor Med, would be based in Rome and under the command of Rear Adm. Enrico Credendino.
The so-called Central Mediterranean Route is the most widely used sea route for the migrants, who are smuggled mainly from the Libyan coast across to Malta and the Italian islands of Lampedusa and Sicily. There are also concerns that the trade is increasing the threat of terrorist attacks in Europe.
NATO had not been formally approached for help, Mr. Stoltenberg, the NATO chief, said on Monday. But he said the Western military alliance stood “ready to help if there is a request” for such assistance.
“Of course, one of the problems is that there might be foreign fighters, there might be terrorists, also trying to hide, to blend in, among the migrants,” Mr. Stoltenberg told reporters.
“We have to respond to this turmoil, to these threats, in many different ways,” he said.
Migration routes across the Mediterranean are among the most dangerous in the world, according to European officials, who say more than 20,000 people have died trying to make the crossing during the past two decades.
No comments:
Post a Comment