Sunday, November 08, 2026

African American Voter Turnout Helped Contribute to Major Democratic Wins

November 6, 20264:53 PM ET

Heard on All Things Considered

By Marc Rivers

Ailsa Chang

Tinbete Ermyas

Transcript

NPR's Ailsa Chang speaks with political scientist Andra Gillespie about Black voter turnout during the 2026 midterm election.

AILSA CHANG, HOST:

The blue tsunami of Democratic victories in the midterms was partly powered by a groundswell of support among Black voters. That's especially true in the South, where many voting rights activists had feared the Supreme Court decision gutting the Voting Rights Act would have weakened Black voting power. To help us make sense of all of this, we have called Andra Gillespie. She's a professor of political science at Emory University in Atlanta. Welcome.

ANDRA GILLESPIE: Thank you.

CHANG: So I know we're just a few days out from the election, and there are still some races that have yet to be called, but overall, how big of an increase in Black voter participation did we see in this election compared to the 2024 election or even previous midterm election cycles, do you think?

GILLESPIE: So I'm going to use my state of Georgia as an example because Georgia does collect data on voter turnout by race. That would be really helpful in this election cycle. So in absolute terms, compared to 2022, we saw higher voter turnout amongst African Americans, Latinos and Asian American voters in the state of Georgia. White voters actually had lower voter turnout compared to 2022. And so that actually helps to contribute to overall Black and Asian American voters in particular making up a larger share of the 2026 electorate than they did amongst registered voters.

CHANG: What about Black male voters? I want to focus on them for a moment because President Trump did make some inroads with Black men back in 2024, even though they still largely voted for Kamala Harris. And now I see that exit polls are showing a swing back to Democrats among Black men. So I'm curious, why do you think this is happening, or what is happening?

GILLESPIE: If I had to proffer a hypothesis...

CHANG: Yeah.

GILLESPIE: ...It's probably because of economic issues. One of the things that's actually really interesting nationally if we look at the voter poll or the exit poll data, the economy ranked as the top issue amongst voters overall, but especially in southern states like South Carolina and Georgia and Mississippi, Black voters were actually more likely to cite the economy as their top issue than we saw in those national averages.

CHANG: I want to talk about the historic nature of this election that maybe transcends party politics. I mean, in the governor races, you see this especially. There were a number of historic firsts. You had David Crowley elected as Wisconsin's first Black governor, Keisha Lance Bottoms, the country's first Black woman governor, Byron Donalds, who was elected to become Florida's first Black governor. And I know that these are all different races. These are distinct individuals I'm talking about. But do you see any through line in the role that Black voters may have played in these particular historic wins?

GILLESPIE: Well, yes, but I think there's also this larger issue of candidates supply and Black politicians feeling confident enough that they can run for statewide office. You know, a generation ago, two generations ago, this would have been a risky move, so if you had a really safe congressional seat, like Congressman Donalds', had you might not choose to run (ph), especially if you were a Democrat for statewide office, because you're going to give up a guaranteed seat in order to take a risk and run for a seat that you might not eventually win.

CHANG: Yeah.

GILLESPIE: Well, there's been more examples of Blacks being able to run successfully for statewide office in both the Democratic and the Republican Parties. And I think Stacey Abrams' work in 2018, though it was unsuccessful in getting her to the governor's mansion, actually proved that Black candidates could be viable.

CHANG: What about the role of redistricting? Because earlier this year, the Supreme Court struck down a key provision of the Voting Rights Act, right? And many Democrats and voting rights activists thought this would weaken Black voting power. Then we saw a number of Southern states move to redraw congressional maps in a way that experts said would further diminish Black representation across all levels of government. But it doesn't look like that happened. Why not, you think?

GILLESPIE: What we saw across the South in North Carolina, in Tennessee, Texas, you see these instances of Republican voting strength being diluted to try to create as many seats as possible. And what it did in a wave or tsunami election year was create these districts that Democrats could actually compete in.

CHANG: Was there anything about this year's elections that gave you any indications about where the Black vote might go going forward after this particular midterm election?

GILLESPIE: Republicans miscalculated in 2024 that those defections towards the Republican Party in that election were evidence of some type of permanent realignment...

CHANG: Right.

GILLESPIE: ...Instead of looking at what factors might have been influencing people to vote. What that means going forward is that neither party should consider this current election as indicative of what's going to happen in future elections.

CHANG: Andra Gillespie, political science professor at Emory University, thank you very much for joining us today.

GILLESPIE: Thank you.

African American Candidates for Governor Make History with 2026 Midterm Victories

By Emily Mae Czachor

November 5, 2026 / 2:07 PM EST / CBS News

Americans elected their first Black woman into a gubernatorial role during the 2026 midterms, alongside four other Black candidates who won races for governor around the United States on Tuesday.

The races culminated, respectively, in victories for Keisha Lance Bottoms, a Democrat, in Georgia; Byron Donalds, a Republican, in Florida; David Crowley, a Democrat, in Wisconsin; Aaron Ford, a Democrat, in Nevada; and Wes Moore, also a Democrat, who was reelected to serve a second term as governor of Maryland. He became the state's first Black governor when he was elected in 2022. 

Including Moore, only three Black Americans have previously been elected to serve as U.S. governors. Former New York Gov. David Paterson, who is also Black, became governor when Eliot Spitzer resigned in 2008. 

Once Bottoms and Crowley were projected the winners in their races, Moore reflected on their wins to CBS News on Tuesday, calling the victories "incredibly important."

"This is exciting, because up until this moment, I was the only Black governor in America. And I was very clear that that's a title that I did not want to hold onto for very long," said Moore. "I'm only the third African American ever elected governor in the 250-year history of this country, and, now, in one cycle, we have at least doubled that number. I just think it's incredibly important. It's a historic moment."

Bottoms has been hailed as a trailblazer for more reasons than one, as she will become the first Black woman elected to a gubernatorial position in U.S. history. She will also be the first woman to serve as governor of Georgia when she joins the ranks of a record-high number of women — 17 — in governor's offices nationwide. 

She told "CBS Mornings" co-host Gayle King on Wednesday that she had been trying to tune out the results when she learned that she won.

"I had put in my AirPods to work on my speech, and my husband was on the sofa near me, laying near me, and he kicked me," said Bottoms, a former Atlanta mayor. "I went like, 'What?' He said, 'They called it.' And I said, 'Called what?' And so that's how I knew."

Donalds, who served as U.S. representative for Florida's 19th District after his election to that spot in 2020, is now also slated to become Florida's first Black governor. He is also the first Black Republican elected governor in the nation.

In Wisconsin, Crowley, a moderate Democrat, defeated Republican challenger Tom Tiffany in the culmination of a governor's race that played out in one of the country's most purple states. Tiffany, a U.S. representative, is also one of President Trump's top allies. 

Ford, who was elected as Nevada's attorney general in 2018, won his state's gubernatorial race against Republican Gov. Joe Lombardo, CBS News projected on Thursday. He will become Nevada's first Black governor and the first Black governor ever elected west of the Mississippi. 

African Americans Played a Pivotal Role the Michigan Senate Race Bringing El Sayed to Victory

November 5, 2026 3:56pm EST

The Conversation

Progressive Abdul El-Sayed’s victory in Michigan’s U.S. Senate race was one of the most-watched contests in the 2026 midterm elections

As the results for this race came in, I had my eye on one demographic: Black voters. I am a political scientist who studies Black political behavior. My research has been published in numerous journals, as well as in my forthcoming book, “Black Resilience,” which examines Black voters’ political participation.

Wayne County voters

The support of Black voters for El-Sayed was not a given. In the August primary, 62% of Detroit voters chose U.S. Rep. Haley Stevens over El-Sayed. Many pundits predicted it would be difficult for El-Sayed to gain support in Detroit, which is about 75% Black.

After the primary, El-Sayed made overtures by sharing his plans to improve the lives of Black Americans, which included supporting the growth of minority-owned businesses, creating more affordable housing, eliminating food deserts and expanding the Rx Kids cash assistance program nationwide.

About 91.8% of Detroit voters supported El-Sayed in the general election, according to the city’s unofficial results. Detroit City Clerk Janice Winfrey said 209,924 residents voted in the 2026 midterms, up about 21% from the 2022 midterm elections. For the 2024 presidential election, 247,770 city residents cast a ballot.

In fact, El-Sayed received 70.6% of Wayne County votes, which includes Detroit. In 2024, Kamala Harris received 62.7% of the vote in Wayne County.

Statewide support is holding steady

In the 2024 presidential election, Michigan’s Democratic vote share fell to 48.3%, from 50.6% in 2020, as the state went for Donald Trump instead of Democratic nominee Harris.

Despite their ideological differences, Sen. Elissa Slotkin and El-Sayed drew similar support among Black voters. In 2024, Slotkin – a moderate Democrat – won 48.6% of the vote, a small margin over Mike Rogers, who was the Republican candidate in that race. In 2026, El-Sayed defeated Rogers statewide by a substantially wider margin, winning 52% of the vote.

In other words, these early election results do not indicate whether Black voters embraced El-Sayed’s progressive platform or simply voted for the Democratic candidate. Voters may have been rejecting Republican Party politics or expressing anger toward Trump over pocketbook issues.

Researchers from Michigan State University found that precincts with more than 80% of Black voters supported Democratic statewide candidates over Republicans at a rate of 92% to 94% during the 2024 general election, which is only slightly lower than the 94% to 95% levels observed in similar precincts during the 2020 contest between Trump and Joe Biden.

Even while Black voters overwhelmingly support Democrats, small shifts in their support and turnout can influence the outcome of close and competitive races. These shifts may help explain differing outcomes, including El-Sayed’s victory in 2026 and Harris’ defeat there in 2024.

While Black voter support for El-Sayed was high, estimated at around 86% statewide, Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s support among Black voters was about 94% in the 2022 gubernatorial race, according to an ABC exit poll.

Similarly, preelection polling indicated that Jocelyn Benson, the Democratic nominee for governor, polled more favorably among nonwhite voters compared to El-Sayed. NBC exit poll data shows that 86% of Black voters in Michigan supported El-Sayed, while 90% supported Benson, who won the governorship over Republican John James.

Historic power and unity

Black voters are often strategic voters who support the candidate they believe best aligns with Black interests, which has usually been the Democratic candidate since the Civil Rights Movement.

Generally, Black voters have made their electoral choices based on what’s believed to be best for the group as a whole – a concept described by political scientist Michael C. Dawson as linked fate.

However, recent research shows that Black social networks and institutions, including churches and civic organizations, reinforce expectations of political solidarity. Weaker ties to these networks may lessen the social pressure that encourages Black Americans to participate in politics and support Democratic candidates.

Lower participation by Black Americans could lead to elected officials paying less attention to issues important to Black voters, such as affordability and the cost of living, healthcare, and reducing racial discrimination. If officials assume Black voters will remain loyal to Democrats, they’re under less pressure to win their votes by addressing their concerns.

My research has demonstrated that after the 2024 election, Black women in particular felt frustrated with the Democratic Party, yet they participated in elections despite these frustrations.

An agenda that matters

El-Sayed was part of a field of notable Democratic candidates in this election cycle. For example, Angie Nixon, a state representative in Florida, championed affordability alongside a moratorium on evictions and a universal jobs program, while James Talarico, a former schoolteacher in Texas, focused on public education.

El-Sayed is a former public health official who had not previously held elected office. This may have turned off some Black voters who often value governing experience. El-Sayed advocated for Medicare For All and lowering the costs of gas prices and groceries.

Although he doesn’t identify as a democratic socialist, El-Sayed campaigned with several progressive elected officials, such as U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders endorsed El-Sayed on the day he announced his candidacy in 2025. El-Sayed also campaigned with the Black establishment, including U.S. Rep. Jim Clyburn of South Carolina. Former President Barack Obama spoke at a rally for El-Sayed in Detroit in October 2026.

Stevens, who lost the Democratic nomination to El-Sayed in the primary, endorsed Republican Mike Rogers after she attended a service with the Republican candidate at a predominantly Black church in Detroit two days before the election. Stevens’ tactic drew severe backlash from Democratic leaders and may have mobilized some Black voters to turn out for El-Sayed on Election Day.

“I felt like she pimped my community,” one Black voter from Detroit told ABC News in response to Stevens’ last-minute endorsement of Rogers.

Note: This article does not reflect the views of the Pan-African News Wire on the events leading to the victory of Dr. Abdulrahman Mohamed El-Sayed.

SLU Puts African American Studies Department Under Review, Students Say Gutting is Not an Option

St. Louis Public Radio | By Andrea Y. Henderson

Nov. 6, 2026 at 5:00 a.m. CST

St. Louis University students CJ Summers, left, and Hadiya Abdul-Mu'min, in blue, attend a meeting of concerned faculty, students, staff and community members on campus on Monday. They talked about how the African American Studies department changed their lives for the better.

Students and alumni are demanding that St. Louis University not eliminate or downsize its African American Studies department, just five years after its creation. The university had put the department under review in September, along with 10 other arts and sciences majors.

Over 150 students, staff, faculty and alumni gathered on campus Monday night for an African American Studies town hall and teach-in to affirm the importance of the department’s existence and to warn university leaders that community members and students are activating accordingly.

The threat to dismantle African American Studies sends a clear message to the community and students that Black life is not valuable to St. Louis University, said CJ Summers, a junior African American Studies major.

“This principle of displacement is being performed by SLU right now when they have African American Studies under review, when they're trying to displace our professors from the suite that we have within the African American Studies office, when we see that they may try to displace students into other majors and force us to study other things,” Summers said. “I want to study African American Studies.”

Monday night’s teach-in was standing room only as a panel of students and alumni discussed how SLU’s African American Studies department and major changed their lives for the better. The panel also encouraged other concerned students, faculty and staff to continue to push back against the university as it moves forward with the department’s review.

Once students learned of the university’s call to review its African American Studies department, they began holding informational meetings, and the university’s Society of African American Studies began posting social media messages about the threat to dismantle it. They called on the community and students to rally around the department to help save it. They also created a petition, which has garnered over 2,500 signatures, calling on the university to uphold its Jesuit mission and not destroy or restructure its African American Studies department. The university cites budget shortfalls for program and department reviews, which is also being conducted for nearly 30 programs across the university. The African American Studies department’s fate is to be decided by the end of the year.

The department’s review could examine a number of measures, such as graduation rates, the number of majors and minors and class enrollment numbers.

St. Louis University’s African American Studies department teaches critical thinking and helps students navigate a hostile world; it is not the dead weight of the university, said Christopher Tinson, chair of the African American Studies department.

“A healthy Black Studies or African American Studies department, wherever they exist, have an impact on the general well-being and health of the faculty of color at that university,” Tinson said. “If we are concerned about retention, if we are concerned about the promotion and tenure and just feeling of belonging at universities, that often relies on a healthy African American Studies department.”

Isaiah Banks, a mechanical engineering junior, said the department is more than just an academic division of the school; it is a second home for some students.

“Once I found out about it [the department], and once I started coming into the office more, and once I started meeting all the faculty and the students within the office, I felt a lot more like I belonged on campus,” Banks said. “I felt like I really created a family within the Black community at SLU, which I did not have before I came into the [African American Studies] office.”

Many students said the university does not do a good job of exposing students to what the African American Studies department offers academically.

“A lot of the STEM and engineering majors know that our department is very secluded from the African American Studies department as a whole … and coming to SLU as a freshman, we're not really aware of all of the opportunities that are on this side of campus because we're on the other side of campus pretty much all day.

“We aren't really exposed to these things unless someone tells us to come to this side of campus, and a lot of the time our academic advisers do not really tell us about these opportunities,” said Banks, who is also the student senator for SLU’s chapter of National Society of Black Engineers.

Students said if it were not for conversations with friends, meetings with African American Studies faculty members or talking with Black faculty with ties to the department, they could have gone their entire college careers without knowing about the department.

Students, alumni and faculty listen as a panel of people share their experiences at St. Louis University with its African American Studies department on Monday.

Since the federal government’s push to rid colleges and universities of diversity, equity and inclusion efforts, many universities that offer courses on African Americans and their history have either quietly eliminated them, drastically cut department funding or have placed them under review. St. Louis Alderwoman Alisha Sonnier told the crowd that the national efforts to erase Black history concerned her, so she spoke with SLU’s leadership about their position on African American Studies.

“As soon as I found out that the department was under review, I was actually shocked because just a few months prior, I had been told by leadership that African American Studies or Women and Gender Studies were some departments that were not on the table for consideration of being cut; they were looked at as being essential to the university fulfilling its Jesuit mission of higher good, greater truth,” Sonnier said.

While at the university, Sonnier majored in African American Studies. She told the crowd that she would not be an elected official or an activist without the department’s guidance.

“I remember very distinctly at the time when I was here, similar to just first learning about Black movements, Black struggle, really learning that a lot of my experiences were not unique,” she said. “Many of the things that I was advocating for and fighting for and felt strongly for, so too did the class before me, so too did the class 10 years before me, so too did people 20 years before me, so too did my ancestors before we were even allowed to be admitted to the institution, even though we built it.”

Descendants of the enslaved people who built St. Louis University were also among the crowd. Students lifted their stories, as did those families in the former Mill Creek Valley community, who were forced to leave their homes in the mid-to-late 1900s to make room for parts of St. Louis University. Students and alumni brought their existence to the forefront, so leadership can remember that Black people have been erased from the university’s history before and that they do not want it to continue.

Robin Proudie, the executive director of Descendants of the St. Louis University Enslaved, told engaged students and faculty that the nearly 200 known ancestors and their descendants are foundational to the university and should be treated as such.

“It's two communities central to the founding of this university: the Jesuits — the Society of Jesus — who have core curriculum classes … but there's another community, my ancestors and the Black community to which SLU sits on, who is also foundational,” said Proudie, a junior. “How can you be built off the backs of Black people, and then don't want to have a place or the academic arm to where you're going to teach about that Black experience.”

Black Studies history

African American students have been at the center of the push for change from SLU’s leadership to advance their academic freedom and equality on campus. Over the past five decades, they have been demanding the university step up and provide racial and economic equity for Black students, faculty and staff.

The nation’s first Black Studies department was created at San Francisco State University in 1968. In 1973, Black veterans organized a student sit-in on SLU’s campus and demanded an academic program be offered that reflected the Black experience. Through the protest, students gained an institute that offered a certificate program in which students could develop their own major. The university finally declared African American Studies a major in 2010.

It was not until 2021 that the university accelerated the approval for the program to become a department. It was because of the students' demands for racial and economic equity in October 2020 after police killed George Floyd and Breonna Taylor. However, students had been pushing for the department since 2014 after the police killings of Michael Brown Jr. and VonDerrit Myers Jr. Students occupied campus and demanded leaders to make the school more equitable for Black students, staff and faculty. The occupation produced the Clock Tower Accords. The first accord was to increase the African American Studies program's budget.

Alumni say the strenuous efforts they have made over the decades to bolster the African American Studies department and advance racial equity on campus should be enough for SLU’s leadership to see the department’s importance.

“I have four degrees from the school (SLU), and the other degrees are worthless if it was not for the African American Studies degree, because it is a centering degree that aims you so that you can use your superpowers in the most appropriate of ways,” said SLU alumnus Etefia Umana.

Umana, who attended the university in the 1980s and '90s, said that if the university is serious about its commitment to the Jesuit mission, it will recognize that the establishment and longevity of the African American Studies department are central to that mission.

“It's all about what the institution values. I'm assuming that theology and philosophy don't have a ton of majors, not pulling in a ton of money, probably don't even have the most renowned scholars in their field, but they wouldn't dare touch that pillar because it's part of the Jesuit curriculum,” he said. “There's a value there that they see above and beyond the fiscal resource that it brings to the institution.”

Students said they are willing to work with leadership to find ways to better support the department and attract more students without disrupting it or students’ academic achievement.

Ending the African American Studies department or even downsizing it is not negotiable, said Sonnier.

“If St. Louis University is to dismantle or decline African American Studies, you are doing something that's to the antithesis of your mission. All departments are important, but only so many groups’ literal blood, sweat and enslavement aided to the building of the institution,” she said. “It should be hands off African American Studies if the institution is to acknowledge its sin … if it's to be honest about who built this campus, if to be honest about who had to be displaced in order for the campus to further be built and expanded, then it should honor African American Studies.”

African-American Studies is the Foundation of Democratic Movements and A Guide to Resistance; It Cannot Be Erased

By Candece Monteil , National Urban League

11 AM EST, Sun Nov 8, 2026

TBE---BlackStudent1440.png

Marc H. Morial 

President and CEO

National Urban League

“A people without the knowledge of their history, origin, and culture is like a tree without roots.” - Marcus Garvey

When I graduated high school in New Orleans, America was a different place. Black Americans were all but locked out of economic opportunity because of the color of our skin and the racial caste system that saw us as no more than servants to White Americans; many of whom benefited financially and socially from our enslavement for centuries.

​Growing up in a city rife with segregation, I channeled my frustrations into my studies. When I enrolled at the University of Pennsylvania, an Ivy League institution that was built in part by enslaved people, my people, I knew the best way to reengineer the system was by understanding how it worked and its connection to the conditions of Black Americans in this country. My double major was in economics and African American Studies.

That education prepared me to become a leader who understood that, for America to progress as a nation, it had to provide pathways to financial independence, safety, and sustainability for the people who built it. It was clear to me that at every juncture in this nation’s history where African Americans began to create opportunity for themselves, the efforts were cut off systemically or with physical violence, as we saw in the case of the bombing of Tulsa in 1920.

The fallout from these events, and from policies that blocked the ballot box like literacy tests and poll taxes, has shown us that every effort to stifle us leads to cultural disarray and stalls our ability to move forward.

​Yet, today, we find ourselves once again succumbing to infighting about the same struggles we could have extinguished generations earlier by tackling systemic racism and its impact on our economy, our standing in the world, and our collective understanding of one another.

We have an administration that entered a zero-sum game targeting diversity initiatives with executive orders that so thinly veil their racism it's laughable. The result of those orders has been a massive spike in unemployment, creating a ripple effect through our entire economic system. It’s been cuts to university budgets and to schools that are simply trying to uphold our nation’s values of ensuring that all Americans have access to the American dream regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, or faith. Those cuts have stifled essential medical breakthroughs, cancer research, clean energy development, and the development of equitable, ethical artificial intelligence.

The next victim in the cutting spree is African-American studies.

The University of Texas at Austin, the University of Iowa, and the University of Kansas are just a few institutions that are shuddering or consolidating their African-American studies programs in this climate. Some are citing low enrollment as a reason for their reductions. But it is impossible to ignore the threats of budget cuts and the evaporation of essential federal dollars from an administration circling diversity programs like a hawk.

The restrictions have been so significant that simply mentioning the words “black,” women,” “disabled,” or “inclusion” can risk financial ruin.

But as Dr. Marcus Garvey stated, “A people without the knowledge of their history, origin, and culture is like a tree without roots.” I’d take it a step further and say that a nation without knowledge of its past, its origins, and its culture is like a tree without roots.

African-American studies teaches college students, the young people preparing to lead us into the future, why our country operates the way it does today and provides a blueprint for how to leverage our Democracy and constitutional rights to drive change.

African-American history is not only about the challenges that Black Americans have faced since we arrived in the 13 colonies in bondage; it shows the power of protesting, the endurance of community, and the meaning of community.

It’s a field of research that challenges harmful narratives, as Dr. W.E.B. Du Bois did in his 1935 book Black Reconstruction in America, overturning the prevailing racist Dunning School narrative, proving that post-Civil War democratic experiments failed not because of Black incompetence, but because white elites deliberately fractured multi-racial labor solidarity to re-establish control.

​It was also the focus of Kevin Roberts's Ph.D. dissertation, the President of the Heritage Foundation. The irony of studying slave communities, kinship networks, and survival strategies in Louisiana during the 18th and 19th centuries, while authoring Project 2025, a document designed to strip Americans of our Constitutional rights, cannot be overlooked.

There’s power in these programs and understanding Black history. There is also power to be gained by blocking an increasingly frustrated population’s access to historical practices, thereby demanding more from our leadership and government.

Philosopher George Santayana once said that "Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.”

We are at a critical juncture in our history, inching toward repeating the worst parts of our past and recreating a system that serves only a few. And the only way we will survive it is by standing together. And we can only stand together by understanding and accepting the flaws of our past to build a better future.

We cannot allow a field as precious as African-American Studies to die because of political pressure. Not now, not ever.

If we do, it will be at our own peril.

Floods Bring Rare Relief to US Southwest Reservoirs as Lake Powell Rises 20 Feet

By WUFEI YU

2:04 PM EST, November 8, 2026

PHOENIX (AP) — Recent flooding across the U.S. Southwest is providing rare relief to thirsty reservoirs that had fallen to record lows amid a yearslong megadrought.

Storms in late October and early November sent torrents of water through normally small or dry creeks that overflowed their banks and flooded local communities.

Hundreds of people were told to evacuate, and the flooding cut off access to some areas. Yet most of that water will end up feeding depleted lakes and underground aquifers, said Martin Hoerling, a climate scientist and hydrologist at the University of Colorado, Boulder.

“That’s somewhat of an unexpected boost from Mother Nature,” Hoerling said.

Last winter’s lackluster snowfall did little to recharge water bodies when it melted in the spring and summer, when they typically get their biggest bump of the year.

Then came the chaotic climate phenomenon, El Niño, that has intensified heavy rain and floods. Experts say its impacts will last several more months, potentially further boosting water supplies across the West where water primarily is stored in lakes, aquifers and snowpack.

Lake Powell, the second-largest reservoir in the U.S., rose more than 20 feet (6.1 meters) from its mid-September low — dwarfing its gains from this year’s snowmelt, Hoerling said. Still, the lake remained just over a quarter full, and 15 of its 17 boat launches remained unusable as of Friday.

The floodwaters and additional rain could raise the lake along the Arizona-Utah border further, for a total of over 1.2 million acre-feet — enough to support around 4 million average families for a year, Hoerling estimated.

Rain brings temporary relief to regional and local water supplies

Cities in the region reported some of their wettest weather in decades.

Before storms began dumping about 7 inches (17.78 centimeters) of rain around Pagosa Springs, Colorado, in October, more than 10,000 people in the town and surrounding communities were under water restrictions. Restaurants were encouraged to serve water only on request, town manager David Harris said. Those restrictions are now lifted.

“While the storm was destructive, I think there is a silver lining,” Harris said. “You’re getting a good start to the winter snowpack in the higher elevations.”

Upper Lake Mary, which captures spring snowmelt in Northern Arizona and supplies Flagstaff, Arizona, with up to 40% of its water, received more than 3 billion gallons of water since early October, said Flagstaff water production manager Brian Huntzinger.

Storms last weekend dumped the equivalent of more than two years of water into the town’s surface water supply and provided a buffer for an operation that depends heavily on underground aquifers, Huntzinger said.

“It’s just a great, great thing to see,” Huntzinger said. “We might be overflowing at this rate before we see any snow fly.”

In central Arizona, heavy floodwaters that trapped people in their homes gushed into streams that feed the Verde River. That prompted water officials to release water from two nearly full dams into the Verde’s normally dry stretch in metro Phoenix, said Bo Svoma, the principal meteorologist at the Salt River Project that manages reservoirs on the Salt and Verde rivers.

Wet weather is unlikely to change decisions on the Colorado River

The region remains in drought despite the intense rains.

And decisions already have been made to divvy up water in the Colorado River basin. The U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which manages reservoirs in the West, is unlikely to change its water releases from Lake Powell or other areas until it knows when snowpack has peaked, typically around April, said Jack Schmidt, a Utah State University professor who studies the Colorado River.

Reclamation spokesperson Mary Carlson acknowledged conditions have improved but added ”considerable uncertainty remains.”

Under the federal plan for managing the Colorado River’s Lower Basin, California, Nevada and Arizona will collectively reduce water use by 1.25 million acre-feet (about 1.54 billion cubic meters) annually in the next two years. That is enough to fill over 600,000 Olympic-sized swimming pools, with the possibility of larger cuts depending on conditions.

Nevada and Arizona are challenging the plan in court.

Some Arizona cities have agreed to fund preliminary work to reduce reliance on the Colorado River by expanding an existing dam on the Verde River to capture runoff from storms, Svoma said.

“We need to figure out how to be resilient in a drier future. And we’re not quite there yet,” Hoerling said.

Voters Demanded Economic Relief. Trump and Democrats Face Tough Choices on How to Deliver

Associated Press Economics Writer Joshua Boak. (AP Photo/J. David Ake)

By JOSH BOAK

7:44 AM EST, November 8, 2026

WASHINGTON (AP) — Voters have sent a strong election-year message to the new Democratic congressional majority and President Donald Trump: Repair the damage inflation has done to the economy.

Trump, who campaigned on the idea that a Democratic victory in the midterms would trigger a 1929-style economic depression, has maintained that the economy is booming. Since his party lost in Tuesday’s voting, he has claimed he is willing to work with Democrats in the House and Senate, though that’s not something he has done much of in the past.

“I’ll get along, probably, with the Democrats, unless they want to be destructive,” Trump told reporters last week.

After Friday’s strong jobs report showed employers adding 165,000 jobs and the unemployment rate dipping to 4.1%, Trump was defiant. “Democrats may control Congress, but I will NEVER stop fighting for you, and I will VETO anything that hurts America,” he said in a text message to his supporters.

Democrats are seeking to check Trump’s power and are preparing for early fights on government spending. Other challenges include chronic budget deficits, tariffs, artificial intelligence and difficult choices about a Social Security system that could run short of money in as little as six years.

But as long as rising prices keep making middle-class lives less affordable, Democrats and Republicans alike face the risk of angering and alienating voters in the next election cycle.

“Until inflation and interest rates are under control, the likelihood of change elections is going to be high on an ongoing basis,” said Marc Goldwein, senior vice president at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

Americans want lower prices

Trump’s tariffs and the war against Iran that he launched in February contributed to the consumer price index climbing to 3.7% annually. The president also tried to bully the Federal Reserve, an independent body tasked with keeping inflation low, to slash its benchmark interest rate in ways that could have worsened inflation.

The gridlock of a Republican White House and Democratic Congress gives the Fed more room to maneuver, possibly smoothing the central bank’s ability to return inflation to the 2% target it has failed to reach for nearly six years.

“I think that one of the surprise winners Tuesday was the Fed,” said Douglas Holtz-Eakin, an economist and president of the center-right American Action Forum.

The Democratic Senate could block Trump’s ability to fill potentially open spots on the Fed board, Holtz-Eakin said, removing “Trump’s incentives to meddle with the Fed” and clearing a path for Fed Chair Kevin Warsh “to follow his instincts and aggressively reduce inflation.”

Trump has maintained that the costs of oil, gasoline and diesel will all plummet once the Iran war ends. The problem is he refuses to say when or how the war will come to a conclusion.

John Cochrane, an economist at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, stressed that the Fed’s efforts to combat inflation would be helped if the federal government reduced budget deficits.

“It takes monetary and fiscal restraint,” he said.

The federal government keeps borrowing about $2 trillion annually

The U.S. government keeps amassing debt as tax revenues fall short of burgeoning spending on Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and other programs. Paying the interest on the national debt now tops $1 trillion annually and exceeds spending on the military. The problem could spiral because investors have pushed up the interest rates charged on government debt over the past year.

Neither the White House nor Democrats ran on spending cuts. The president wants an additional $500 billion a year for the military, while some Democratic candidates have pushed for restoring Affordable Care Act subsidies that lapsed under Trump.

Since August, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has repeatedly said the administration would put forward a plan to trim the roughly $2 trillion annual budget deficit. Bessent is working with White House budget director Russell Vought on cuts they’re branding as a “fiscal consolidation plan,” to be released after the election.

Deficit reduction would likely require some combination of tax increases and spending cuts, Goldwein said. But he said that the lowest hanging fruit would be to trim Medicare expenditures in ways that save money for both the government and patients.

“It’s not rocket science,” he said. “The most important thing you can do is reduce healthcare costs and find policies that lower the costs of Medicare, which will reduce deficits and interest rates.”

AI could power stronger growth, but voters have concerns about the technology

When Harvard University economist Jason Furman thinks about the most important economic issues facing the United States, AI is at the top of his list.

“It’s the most screamingly obvious investment boom this country has ever had, or, possibly, second to railroads” in the late 19th century, Furman said.

Using AI, Furman has built an economic analysis tool called Econvitals that replicates some of the work done when he was chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers in Democratic President Barack Obama’s administration.

Econvitals parsed construction spending data on Tuesday and found an 80.6% increase in data center construction over the past year, while spending on building homes, schools, factories and offices had fallen.

The stock market sold off last week on concerns that Democrats could restrict the construction of data centers and impose guardrails on AI. But the American economy still needs the technology to keep fueling growth now and into the future.

Trump has been vociferous in promoting the sector and has taken a hands-off stance on regulating AI, insisting that existing laws and voluntary agreements signed by tech companies are enough. He has shrugged off public concerns about the risks of job losses and large-scale cyberattacks, but a majority in The AP Voter Poll, a sweeping survey of the American electorate conducted in all 50 states, say AI does more harm than good for the economy.

The dilemma is that AI is helping to propel demand in the economy and sustain the stock market. If those slipped, there could be less consumer spending, lower growth and many in the U.S. feeling even worse off financially.

“Every time you have a single strength in an economy you are also having a big vulnerability,” Furman said.

Social Security needs to be rescued

Senators who won six-year terms last week will face the politically fraught challenge of working with Trump’s successor to find ways to save Social Security, which is projected to be unable to pay full benefits at the end of 2032.

Removing the cap on payroll taxes and increasing the retirement age are among the possible lifelines for sustaining the program that provides income to older Americans and those with disabilities. But any changes would likely need to be bipartisan to get enough votes to clear the Senate because Social Security overhauls cannot be made by party-line votes through the reconciliation process.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said she saw an opening earlier this year to fix Social Security when she overheard Sen. Bernie Moreno, an Ohio Republican, talk about the need to lift the cap on payroll taxes. “I reached out to him in a matter of days,” she said in an interview this summer. The two senators went public with a plan that is still being formulated as legislation.

Warren, who worked with the Republicans on a law this year to encourage the construction of more homes, said other bipartisan efforts had failed because Republican lawmakers had been afraid to cross Trump.

But with Social Security, there is a need to act now. Experts say “the checks that go out to seniors will drop by nearly a quarter” after 2032, Warren said.

“Think what that means, literally, to millions and millions of Americans, who depend on those Social Security checks, or who have parents who depend on them. And Congress is doing nothing,” she said.

Democrats Plan to Push Clean Energy to Lower Bills and Challenge Trump’s Fossil Fuel Agenda

Solar panels generate electricity Friday, Oct. 2, 2026, near Boulder City, Nev. (AP Photo/John Locher)

By  JENNIFER McDERMOTT

8:59 AM EST, November 8, 2026

Some Democrats are promising to push for more clean energy to help tackle rising energy costs when they take control of Congress in January, though President Donald Trump says he will use his veto power aggressively.

With new majorities in the House and Senate after last week’s midterms, Democrats can set an agenda boosting clean energy and addressing climate change. While those are traditionally core priorities of the party, climate was not a central topic in this election cycle.

Democrats can begin investigations and hold hearings into climate policy rollbacks and elimination of green energy grants by the Republican administration, potentially trying to undo some changes and restore renewable energy incentives.

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, the top Democrat on the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said Trump’s clean energy attacks drove up prices for taxpayers. He said Democrats will “work every angle to lower consumers’ energy costs, and we will demand accountability for the massive corruption wrought by Trump’s fossil-fuel donors.”

American Clean Power Association CEO Jason Grumet said everybody who is trying to build clean energy “feels bolstered.”

Enacting major changes would require Republican support because Democrats will lack the numbers to override presidential vetoes. Even then, lower energy bills are not guaranteed because prices also depend on fuel costs, demand and the expense of maintaining the electric grid.

“The wins give Democrats more leverage over spending and more political power to advance a coherent agenda; the question is whether they’ll use that power effectively,” said Lisa Sachs, director of the Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment. “The vote was for affordability and opportunity. Democrats now need to be clear about which policies deliver them.”

Trump said after Tuesday’s election that Democrats will send over “things that are insane” and he will veto them, speaking generally about legislation. But in the comments to Fox News, he predicted that “after a couple of months of vetoes,” he and Democrats will find ways to work together.

The White House said in a statement Wednesday that Trump is “committed to unleashing reliable, affordable, and secure energy sources to lower prices, strengthen our grid, and protect our national security, and is willing to work with anyone to accomplish this.”

Trump promised to lower energy prices. Instead, his war with Iran and other policies increased the price of gasoline, diesel and electricity. At the same time, the administration canceled many clean energy projects and grants and slowed clean energy permitting.

Trump particularly dislikes offshore wind. Developer Orsted said Thursday that Revolution Wind, a large wind farm in federal waters off Rhode Island, has started operating commercially.

Will the president change his tune on green energy? That’s doubtful, said former Sen. Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., co-chair of the government relations practice at ArentFox Schiff.

“He is likely to keep pushing his energy issues, and I think he will be forced to give some room for a new Congress to recreate a different strategy that will add clean energy,” Dorgan said in an email.

Trump promotes expanding production of oil, natural gas and coal, which cause climate change, because he argues that would give the U.S. the lowest-cost electricity. Mike Sommers, CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, the oil and gas industry’s top lobbying group, said that as voters have changed the balance of political power in Washington, “the affordability message is unmistakable.”

Sommers said in a statement there is a real opportunity for bipartisan cooperation to reduce costs and strengthen the economy, starting with an energy permitting reform proposal announced in September. The legislation is aimed at shortening the timeline to get big energy projects started.

Ife Kilimanjaro, executive director of the U.S. Climate Action Network, said Democrats should reject that proposal and use their stronger position to pass legislation that actually builds out much-needed clean energy.

Reversing Trump’s anti-climate policies

The administration has reshaped the Environmental Protection Agency, reversing pollution limits as it promotes fossil fuels.

Clear Street energy transition analyst Tim Moore said he expects Democrats to investigate the climate and environmental rollbacks, in an effort to block some from taking effect. Democrats could also try amending the Clean Air Act to cut carbon pollution and push back against EPA budget cuts, he added.

Rep. Sean Casten, D-Ill., said he is cautiously optimistic some Republicans will now seek to differentiate themselves from Trump and back pro-environmental policies. But without Republican support, Democrats’ more ambitious bills will largely lay out their agenda for 2028, he added.

Climate is not necessarily at the top of Democrats’ list of priorities. They are targeting healthcare access, trade tariffs and the Iran war.

Rep. Frank Pallone, the New Jersey Democrat who is expected to become chair of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said the party should focus on healthcare, affordability, consumer and environmental protections, clean energy and regulating Big Tech.

A potential stalemate seen on clean energy and climate policy

David Victor, a professor of innovation and public policy at the University of California, San Diego, largely expects a stalemate at the federal level on climate and energy policy because of the divided government. He said agreement could come on some bipartisan measures such as a permitting overhaul.

Victor thinks Democratic-led investigations and hearings will center on corruption and other topics that may only touch on energy and climate. Like Casten, Victor said many of the Democratic bills likely will not become law, but will outline what Democrats could accomplish if they win the White House in 2028.

“The Democrats are going to be drafting things that the administration’s not going to like. They don’t have the votes to override a veto, and on top of it, the administration is going to be in turmoil because of its own electoral failures and because of all the investigations,” Victor said. “This seems to me, at the federal level, largely a recipe for kind of intense chaos over the next two years.”

One of the biggest wild cards is the behavior of the administration, which could use executive power to double down on rollbacks of climate and environmental rules, he said.

States could advance clean energy without waiting for Congress

Democrats scored victories in races for governor in states long controlled by Republicans, including Texas and Georgia.

Leah Stokes, a political scientist at the UC Santa Barbara, said there could be a lot of state action on climate next year because of those wins. That is where climate leadership has traditionally come from, she noted. At the federal level, Stokes is optimistic about extending clean energy tax credits since some Republicans support that.

Jay Inslee, a former Democratic governor and congressman from Washington, also expects growing momentum for clean energy in states that elected Democratic governors, particularly in states where they also won legislative majorities.

“This is a really powerful instrument for the United States to join the rest of the world and get back in a leadership position, even if we still have a climate denier that might exercise a veto on some things that we want to do federally,” Inslee said. “So I hope people will pay attention to the big progress we’re going to make on a state-level basis.”

___

Associated Press writers Alexa St. John and Matthew Daly contributed to this report.

Native American Women Made History in Tribal, State and Federal Elections

By SAVANNAH PETERS

7:15 AM EST, November 8, 2026

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. (AP) — A third-grade field trip to the Navajo Nation Council sparked Crystalyne Curley’s political ambition when she witnessed a fiery debate erupt between two tribal lawmakers.

“I thought to myself at a very young age, that’s where I want to be,” Curley said.

On Election Day, Curley surpassed that childhood dream and broke a barrier she says she never imagined as a nine-year-old: She was elected the first woman president of the Navajo Nation.

This week’s elections brought a wave of milestone victories, from the nation’s first Black female governor to the first openly gay man and first Muslim elected to the U.S. Senate. It also marked a turning point for Native American women, whose leadership in their families and communities has rarely translated to formal political power.

Peggy Flanagan became the first Native American woman elected to the Senate, Deb Haaland the first to win a state governorship, and Curley the first to lead one of the largest tribes.

“This is a win for all Navajo women,” Curley told The Associated Press.

Jordan James Harvill, a Cherokee Nation citizen and strategist with the advocacy group Advance Native Political Leadership, said decades of political organizing are bearing fruit as more Native women run for and win office.

“This is a seismic shift that is happening in our communities,” he said.

The Navajo Nation elects its first woman president

Lene Bitsui supported Curley in the Navajo Nation election because she felt she was best positioned to restore order to the tribal government after what she sees as a period of dysfunction. But when Bitsui cast her ballot, she felt pessimistic.

“I thought our people weren’t ready for a female president,” Bitsui said. “I was wrong, and I feel so happy to have been wrong.”

The modern, centralized Navajo government has been led by men since its establishment under federal pressure over a century ago. Navajo has the largest land base of any federally recognized tribe, spanning 27,000 square miles (70,000 square kilometers) in Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, and is second in population to the Cherokee Nation in Oklahoma.

Some Navajo people believe traditional teachings prohibit women from holding top government positions. Others say women’s absence from the presidency stands in contrast to the matrilineal structure of Diné society.

“You see the language of tradition used to both deride the possibility of a woman being president and to say that women’s leadership is needed now,” said Jennifer Nez Denetdale, a professor of Diné studies at the University of New Mexico.

Curley, who narrowly defeated attorney Justin Jones, according to unofficial results, told the AP she faced sexist rhetoric while campaigning and expects to be held to a higher standard as the first woman president.

“As women, we have to work twice or triple as hard, especially within Navajo politics,” said Curley, who also was the first female to lead the tribe’s legislative branch as speaker of the tribal council.

After Curley and her running mate Chris Deschene take office in January, they plan to transition the Navajo Nation away from coal development, historically a major economic engine for the tribe, and reassert its leading role in national discussions around federal Indian policy.

The Seneca Nation of Indians in western New York also elected its first woman president, longtime council member Tina Abrams, on Tuesday.

Native women make gains in U.S. Congress

At her Senate victory celebration in St. Paul, Minnesota, Democrat Flanagan, a citizen of the White Earth Nation and the state’s outgoing lieutenant governor, credited supporters from her community.

“I could not run for the U. S. Senate without Native women. I could not exist in the way that I do without Native women,” Flanagan said.

More than 230 years after the U.S. Senate was established, only four Native people have served in the chamber, all men.

“This is a win that shows we can break every single glass ceiling,” Harvill said.

Flanagan will join Oklahoma Republican Sen. Tom Cole, a citizen of the Chickasaw Nation. A victory for Democrat Mary Peltola, a Yup’ik woman, in Alaska’s still unsettled Senate race, would mark the first time three Native people have served in the chamber simultaneously.

In the House, Kansas Democrat Sharice Davids, Ho-Chunk, and Oklahoma Republican Josh Brecheen, Choctaw, won reelection. New York Democrat Claire Valdez, a citizen of Ysleta del Sur Pueblo, and Michigan Democrat Sean McCann, a citizen of the Citizen Potawatomi Nation, became the first Native Americans elected to represent their states in Congress.

Deb Haaland notches another first in New Mexico

Haaland’s political career has been defined by historic milestones. She was one of the first two Native women elected to Congress in 2018 before becoming the first Native American to lead a U.S. Cabinet agency, the Interior Department.

Now, in her home state of New Mexico, the Laguna Pueblo citizen, will break ground as the first female Native governor of a U.S. state.

“I think it’s a long time coming,” said Haaland, who traces her ancestry in what is now New Mexico back 800 years.

She is tasked with making good on campaign promises to make life more affordable for struggling New Mexicans and addressing persistently poor education outcomes in the state.

Haaland, who is affectionately known as “Auntie Deb” in parts of Indian Country, was tearful reflecting on the support she has received from Native voters and other Native women in politics, including Davids and Flanagan.

“It makes me very happy that we’re able to have a presence,” Haaland said. “It’s not just a slogan. It matters that people feel represented.”

How a Mississippi Election Came Down to the Clerk’s Office

November 8, 2026 at 5:00 a.m. 

Summary

By Robert Samuels, Washington Post

DURANT, Miss. — The ripples of the blue tsunami started in the Delta. Down a tiny road covered in brown leaves from the large oak trees was a house with wood-paneled walls covered with quotes from Maya Angelou and photos of Harriet Tubman. There, Kameisha Smith, 31, sat at a folding table and pressed her long lavender nails on her laptop keyboard, staring at a spreadsheet of people who might solidify a historic change to this country’s political trajectory.

It was 36 hours after a jaw-dropping midterm election, and pundits across the country wondered how this deeply conservative state, with its history of disenfranchisement and disenchantment, ended up with an African American prosecutor named Scott Colom within striking distance of winning election to the U.S. Senate.

“This race has everybody on pins and needles, pins and needles,” Smith said. “This has been the most engagement from young people around here in this election, and everyone wants to know, what’s taking so long? And I’ve got to make sure all their votes count.”

Yes, Colom had zeitgeist-catching commercials and captured the resentment toward Republican Sen. Cindy Hyde-Smith, who had shrugged off worries about the high cost of beef. But there was a more desperate, more granular engine powering record-high turnout and engagement among the state’s Black youth.

Across the Mississippi Delta — poor, Black, rural — there were houses like the one where Smith was busy at work, where organizers spent months figuring out how to get a community of nonvoters excited about reengaging in democracy.

When Colom was trying to figure out the final message for his Senate campaign, he and his team chose to end with a commercial about Medgar Evers, the African American veteran whom white supremacists killed as he was conducting voter registration campaigns.

“We can’t just ask people to vote for me,” Colom said in an interview with The Washington Post on Thursday morning. “We just got to talk about sacrifice. We got to talk about the importance of voting.”

It was also about stressing the idea of what he called “Mississippi Values” — including Evers’s audacious and righteous response to abusive power. Those values were revealed in the work of Fannie Lou Hamer and the Mississippi Freedom Party, and others who worked during the Civil Rights Era to break some of the most racist policies in the South. Still, Colom knew it would take a herculean effort in a place that hadn’t elected a Black politician to statewide office since the fall of Reconstruction.

Smith just focused on reaching would-be voters where she grew up in Holmes County. It is one of the smaller counties in the state — about 15,000 people, 80 percent Black, with 34 percent living below the poverty line. But it was a place where Colom could run up the score to offset Whiter, more conservative districts.

Smith had enlisted canvassers, offering them an hourly wage that dwarfed what they could make at the local Sonic or the DG Market. They drove into housing projects and down country roads, looking to persuade young people to register and older people who had stopped casting ballots to start believing again that their vote matters.

This year, an expected 58 percent of eligible voters there cast ballots, the biggest increase since 2024 of any county in the state, according to a Post analysis of election results and census data. Holmes County had a 16-point increase in its voter turnout compared with 2018, the last midterm election with a similarly competitive Senate race. But there was still work to do. The Senate race between Colom and incumbent Hyde-Smith was too close to call, and Smith wanted to make sure that no ballot was thrown out unfair.

So, with one hand, she scanned down her list of voters that her group had registered and began calling and texting those voters with the other, double-checking if there was any trouble at the polling booths.

The phone blinked and buzzed with responses from first-time voters, which Smith found affirming. But they told her about many problems, too — some said they had to cast “affidavit ballots” because of some sort of mishap at the polling place.

A ballot could provisionally be set aside for a host of reasons. Maybe the voter showed up without an ID, or they might have voted in the wrong precinct or moved without changing their address. An election committee had to review those affidavit ballots by hand, and, in some cases, voters had five business days to address the mistake.

The campaigns estimated there were originally as many as 20,000 instances of voters who cast such ballots. They could make a difference in a race in which about 2,500 votes separate the two candidates.

Smith wanted to get as many ballots counted as possible.

“People are tired of it all,” she said. “They know that people are trying to change the rules on us. And because they voted, I want to make sure they all counted.”

So she and her team of canvassers vowed to crisscross the county to find them before it was too late.

Her phone buzzed again.

After the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act in April, all manner of organizations — from Black Voters Matter to the NAACP to regional nonprofits — were sowing money into the South to energize majority-Black districts with low voter turnout. Holmes County was high on their list.

Smith started organizing in her hometown when she was just in second grade, launching a petition lobbying the school board for new playground equipment. She was hooked, later forgoing finishing college to do community organizing and youth training around Holmes County.

National organizations sought the help of Smith and others to strategize on reviving activism after the Voting Rights Act decision this spring. But in meetings, Smith said, she grew tired of hearing older community leaders complaining about young people not caring enough about the future. No one asked them why. So, she put together a survey asking people under 35 about their voting habits. She distributed it online and at churches.

About 75 responded. Most said they were concerned about the high cost of insurance and neighborhood violence. Some said they were hesitant to vote because it was unclear what any elected official could do for them. Some avoided voting because they did not want to have to serve on a jury.

In response, Smith typed up four-by-six index cards explaining the difference between a senator and a House representative. She secured money to pay people $20 an hour to register voters.

Smith wanted her canvassers young. She signed up 15, 11 of them under 40, and taught them the importance of being nonpartisan when registering people to vote.

She encouraged them to start their voter registration journeys with their own families. One canvasser, Shan’terrius Sly, a 19-year-old honors student at Jackson State, persuaded two dozen family members to sign up. “I’ve always wanted to be an activist,” Sly said. “It’s really time for a new generation to step up and do things. Some of the older generations weren’t invested. Gen Z is aware. We see what’s going on. We aren’t going to let it slide.”

They knocked on doors in the housing projects and drove down long dirt roads to make sure people were registered. They found voters at community events where young people met to ride dirt bikes. If there was a house party, there was a canvasser.

“They were bringing 12 to 13 forms a day,” Smith said. “The county is small, so that’s a lot.”

Smith tallied that the group registered 283 new voters in a county with a voting population of around 12,000. And then, she made and printed guides featuring candidates and their positions, and handed them out to the men hanging out on the street and set up stations at Halloween events called “Trunk or Treat,” where neighbors decorate their cars and put candy in their trunks.

On Election Day, the canvassers gathered at the old house, known as the Nollie Jenkins Family Center, before checking on precincts. If they did not see any voters at the precinct, they drove into the community, rolled down their car windows and asked people if they needed a ride to the polls.

Smith herself drove 15 people, the last of them around 6:50 p.m., which is when she, too, stood in line to cast her ballot before the 7 p.m. deadline. When she handed over her ID, the poll worker looked at her and shook her head.

It turned out that Smith had been purged from the voting rolls because she didn’t update her address.

“I had been so busy trying to register other people that I didn’t check my own,” Smith said. Her ballot was one of 2,443 purged in the county. Her vote would not count.

After 7:30, the canvassers returned to the house and watched the returns. At the beginning, Hyde-Smith had a small, healthy lead. But Holmes County’s votes had not been submitted.

Close to midnight, the Holmes County votes came in. And Colom was ahead by 28 votes.

“We pushed him ahead,” Smith said. “I could not believe it. We showed that our votes matter.”

The next day, Colom traveled to a historically Black college outside Jackson with free pizza to thank the college students who supported him. At night, he ate wings in the basement of the chapel with volunteers. Hyde-Smith told the media she was certain she would emerge victorious, and the governor expressed certainty that she would win.

Attorneys flew in from across the country to help ensure that there would be no foul play when handling the ballots. And Smith’s phone kept buzzing, filled with messages from people from Holmes County who wanted to make sure their votes were not lost in the fray.

Colom has a history of being a trailblazer. At age 28, he became the youngest and first Black judge appointed in the history of Lowndes County and later the first Black city prosecutor for the city of Columbus. He successfully ran for district attorney for Circuit Court District 16 in 2015, running on a reformist agenda that emphasized diversion programs for nonviolent offenders, and unseated a nearly 30-year incumbent. As district attorney, he managed a small staff and personally prosecuted more than two dozen jury trials — obtaining guilty verdicts in nearly all of them.

But Rep. Bennie Thompson, the long-standing congressman from Jackson, told him in the early stages of his Senate campaign that it was most important to be known “as a listener. You’ve got to be out there so people feel like they know you.”

So he barnstormed the state, holding events in all 82 counties — and noting that Hyde-Smith had not hosted a town hall in six years.

“I know so much is at stake,” Colom told The Post after the election. “So because of my ancestors’ sacrifices, I knew that I had no excuse. If I was tired, I said, ‘Listen, I got to keep going.’ If I felt like somebody was like, ‘What would give you a day off?’ I’m like, ‘No, give me a town hall.’ I wanted to make sure I just left it all on the field. So at the end of it, regardless of the outcome, I could feel confident that I honor my ancestors. I honored their sacrifices by sacrificing in ways that’s not even comparable to their sacrifices.”

Colom went to a Trump rally in Corinth in a sweatshirt and tech pants, asking people what they thought about tariffs and gas prices. Video of his casual interactions with the group went viral. His campaign became known for its tart commercials, including a parody of “Sinners” written by his twin brother that portrays a fictional Hyde-Smith as a restless spirit asking for one more chance to keep her promises. Another mocked Hyde-Smith’s suggestion that residents just eat other proteins if beef prices were too high.

But while the national media marveled at their wit, people across the state marveled at something else: They actually knew the people talking in the videos.

“I recognized a man in the video because he used to buy lunch from me at the gas station,” said Alexis York, 29, a federal worker in Jackson, who said she was motivated to vote for the first time in this election. “And that made me feel like he really understood where we were coming from. He wasn’t using actors. So my spirit just told me that he should be the one to win.”

On Thursday morning, Colom walked into a popular greasy spoon called Brent’s Drugs to eat breakfast with volunteers. Three women — two Black, one White — sat at a table marveling at what his election would mean for the state.

“In the shadow of everything, especially with the Nolan Wells case, every time Mississippi comes up, it’s been a negative,” Nickie Gray, 57, said to the other volunteers. “My relatives who live outside, they’re afraid to come here. So with Scott in office, maybe we could let them know that this place has positive things.”

“They think it’s super racist here, and there’s an element of that,” Lee Parrott, 68, replied. “But [with this campaign], I think White people have shown they’re more willing to listen. They’re just frustrated with people thinking that Mississippi is so, so racist.”

Jackie Washington, 73, looked at Colom eating breakfast with his wife at the counter and told the women that she remembered when Black people couldn’t eat at that counter. Now, the Black person dining there was looking like he would represent the entire state, if things kept going the way they were going.

“This place can still change things,” Washington said. “Don’t count us out.”

Later that afternoon, Smith left her home base and headed to the clerk’s office in nearby Lexington to make sure votes were counted. As she pulled into the parking lot, she saw a tall Black man with tiny locks carrying a sheet of paper walking to the car.

“Did you vote?” she asked.

“This was my first time,” said Corey Ellington, 24, a high school football coach. “I was excited about it, but they said something was wrong with my address.”

“Did you get purged?” she asked.

“I don’t know,” Ellington said.

“All right, honey, I’ll find out for you,” she said before walking through the metal detectors and into the clerk’s office. It was a quiet place, with light caramel-colored walls and thick red reading books, and the air freshener made the place smell like a floral soap.

“I have questions about ballots,” she said as she walked to the back, where a county staffer was looking over the voter information. Smith gave him the name of a resident who said she had registered to vote on Sept. 6 but was told at the polls that her registration form was dated Oct. 6, one day after the deadline.

The clerk looked up the voter’s name and birthday, and confirmed the form was received Oct. 6. Smith asked him to pull the physical registration form, just to be sure, and the clerk pulled a stack of papers from the top of a cabinet and searched for the voter.

Smith looked behind him and watched him work. No dice. It turned out that the voter had an organization mail the form in for her, and the organization handed the forms in late. That vote was lost.

“This is why I always come to you and hand them in,” Smith said. “I don’t like when people mess with the mail.”

“Is there any other one I can help you with?” the clerk asked.

Smith rubbed her fingers on her temples and then pulled out notes on her phone with a list of names of voters who had complained about the ballots.

“Yes,” she exhaled.

In the courtroom next door, four election officials stood at a table in front of the bench with a box filled with affidavit ballots. Sly, the 19-year-old canvasser, and four other residents sat on the benches behind, watching the group to ensure that they did not toss out ballots unfairly.

The protocol: Election Commissioner Elnora Patton would read out the name, the address and the phone number — if all were provided — and then describe the issue with the ballot. As the committee read the names, Sly knew the potential voters so well that she could correct Patton when she mispronounced their names. And then, the list of voters with questionable ballots got even more familiar.

So many were family members she had helped to register. One was her cousin, whose 18th birthday was on Oct. 8. He was only 17 when he registered, but Sly thought he would be fine to vote because he would have been of age come Election Day.

“This ballot is rejected,” Patton said. He needed to be 18 by the registration deadline, not Election Day. Sly looked down, frustrated by her misunderstanding of the rules.

The next ballot they called was for Patricia Sly, her great-aunt. The election official eyed the ballot and said it would be rejected if Patricia Sly did not come to the booth with her ID.

“Excuse me,” Sly said. “I brought her to the office earlier today, and she showed her ID, and they said her ballot would count.”

“I don’t see it on the computer,” said another commissioner, looking at the voting rolls.

“Well, I know I brought her,” Sly said. “Please check again.”

The official left the courtroom and returned in a couple of minutes.

“Someone left a copy of the ID on my desk,” she said. The ballot was accepted.

Then came Lawanda Sly, another aunt. She also forgot to bring her ID to the polling place.

“I can get her over here!” Sly said.

But night had fallen, and the commission was closing up for the day. Sly vowed that she would bring her over the next day to make sure that the ballot counts were accurate.

On Friday morning, Sly climbed into her Audi and started blasting Kendrick Lamar as she made her way to pick up her Aunt Lawanda.

“When you’re doing activism, Kendrick just has a song for everything you’re feeling,” she said as the lyrics pounded: “We gon’ be alright.” Sly drove past the clerk’s office and the Dollar General and the large field of grass filled with cars with broken doors and trunks, then scaled up a rocky, pothole-filled street that led to her aunt’s house.

“You ready?” Sly asked.

Lawanda Sly walked out in a T-shirt and blue jeans, jumped into the car and started munching on Doritos from a bag in the back. At 41, she worked as a personal care assistant and did not regularly carry her ID, which is why it had slipped her mind when she went to the polls.

A Colom campaign rally last month in Tupelo. (Brad Vest/Getty Images)

“So did Colom win?” Lawanda asked.

“He’s still in the lead,” her niece replied. At this point, Colom’s lead had extended to 2,000 votes.

“I know that White woman’s mad,” Lawanda told her. “I’m excited for him.”

“It’s Mississippi, so you never know,” Sly replied. She understood the state’s history, its eagerness to purge votes.

Sly walked with her aunt into the courtroom, where the election officials were examining even more affidavit ballots.

“I found her!” Sly said, and the election official smiled. Lawanda giggled and beamed as she handed in her ID to the group, who verified it to be real.

“We are going to accept this ballot,” Patton said.

Lawanda and her niece smiled as they made their way back to the car.

Sly dropped her off and looked at her phone again. More messages. She drove to a stranger’s house with a dog barking and rang the doorbell before leaving a message that he should come to the clerk’s office to check on his ballot.

She called another stranger who promised he would show up with his license at the clerk’s office when he was off work. There was one woman who needed to bring her ID to the polls but left no address, so Sly and Smith were messaging and calling friends in Cruger — population 268 — to figure out if someone knew where she lived and could tell her to come check her ballot. She drove to pick up another woman who had lost her license and had not been sure her vote would count if she showed her voter ID — until she spoke with Sly.

“My vote’s going to count,” Lakeyda Jackson, 29, told her. “But I’m nervous. We got out and did it. The point has been made; our community went out and voted, and he’s ahead. Why haven’t they declared him the winner yet? It’s unfair to you and all the work you put in.”

“It’s like it’s unbelievable when Black people do something,” Sly said. “But we are going to make them believe it.”

They pulled up to the clerk’s office and stepped out of the car. She looked at her phone, and Smith had sent the names of even more people who had difficulties with ballots. So many voices had the potential to be lost.

“We’re doing it,” Sly said. And she walked in with Jackson to ensure that at least one more person’s voice was heard.

Patrick Marley, Katie Mettler and Lydia Sidhom contributed to this report.

Friday, November 06, 2026

Abayomi Azikiwe, PANW Editor, Featured on Black Agenda Report with Executive Editor Margaret Kimberley Analyzing the Midterm Elections with Emphasis on Michigan Senate Race

A hard fought Senate race in the state of Michigan resulted in a comfortable victory for Dr. Abdul Rahman Mohammed El-Sayed. He will be the first Muslim elected to the Senate in the United States.

To watch this interview in its entirety just click on the following URL: Abdul El-Sayed's Senate Victory in Michigan - YouTube

The victory in the Abdul for Senate campaign took place within the broader context of the triumph of Democratic candidates which swept the House of Representatives and the Senate.

Dr. El-Sayed came out in opposition to the war in Iran and for the end of the genocide in Gaza.

Huge numbers of new politicians will enter the House and Senate. Others were elected as Governors in several states particularly in the South.

These developments portend much for the future of politics and race relations in the United States over next few months and two years.

Africa Governance Centre Chair Hails Ethiopia’s Investments in Infrastructure and Energy

Addis Ababa, November 6, 2026 (ENA)— Ethiopia’s continued investments in infrastructure, energy, industry, and productive activities demonstrate the country's commitment to economic transformation, Africa Governance Centre Executive Chair Benedicta Lasi said.

Addressing the Second African Political Parties Summit on its second day, Lasi praised Ethiopia’s development efforts, congratulating Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed, his government, and the Ethiopian people for their commitment to transforming the country.

Ethiopia’s Medemer-led economic policies have gained traction over the last few years in driving sustainable transformation and bringing forward young leaders, she noted.

Stressing the role of political organizations, the Executive Chair stated that long-term development priorities such as industrialization, energy systems, and agricultural productivity require sustained commitment beyond electoral cycles. 

Lasi stressed that political parties must prepare capable leaders, develop sound policies, and strengthen institutional capacity before assuming government responsibilities.

 “An election can place a party in government overnight, but it cannot supply overnight knowledge required to run a ministry, negotiate a major contract, or manage the national economy,” she added.

The Executive Chair emphasized that party schools, research institutions, and policy structures are essential to test proposals, develop sector-specific knowledge, and prepare people for public office. 

Political parties, she added, should help maintain development priorities across changes in government to ensure that national programmes continue over time.

Lasi also emphasized the need for closer cooperation between the African Union and political parties to advance Agenda 2063 and the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA).

 She expressed hope that this cooperation would support the proposed African Political Parties Agenda 2040, which aims to establish standards for internal democracy, national development visions, and leadership development, while promoting women’s participation and young people’s contribution.

Highlighting the Africa Governance Centre’s work, the Executive Chairperson said its African Political Parties Initiative (APPI), launched in 2025, provides a platform for political parties to exchange experiences and strengthen their capacity to govern. 

She noted that the initiative has expanded international cooperation through partnerships in Latin America and Asia, leading to the launch of the Intercontinental Dialogue among Political Parties in Seoul, South Korea, in September 2026.

Lasi also highlighted the Centre’s collaboration with African legislative institutions to strengthen parliamentarians’ capacity to shape national development policies and support economic transformation.

AI Stock Crash Wipes $3.2trln off Wall Street in One Day, Asia Follows

By Al Mayadeen English

Source: FT + WSJ + AFP

6 Nov 2026 12:11

US stocks lost $3.2tn in a day after the Democratic midterm win raised fears of AI data center curbs, and the selloff hit Asia and Europe on Friday.

US stocks lost $3.2 trillion on Thursday, with the Nasdaq 100 plunging 6.4% and the S&P 500 falling 4.4%, after investors concluded that the Democratic midterm victory could slow the artificial intelligence spending boom that carried Wall Street to record highs this year.

The selling crossed into Asia on Friday, pushing Japan and Taiwan into bear markets and triggering a trading halt in Seoul, while European shares also opened lower.

The $3.2 trillion drop on the S&P Composite 1500 was the biggest in dollar terms since the turn of the millennium, according to Financial Times calculations based on FactSet data. The percentage fall was smaller than in past crises such as 2008, because US stocks are now worth far more, but the S&P 500’s 4.4% loss was its worst session since last year’s “liberation day” tariff turmoil.

The Nasdaq Composite fell 5.5%, its sharpest daily percentage loss since April 2025, AFP reported. In dollar terms, the damage was without precedent, with the index shedding an estimated $2.49 trillion in market value, according to Dow Jones Market Data cited by the Wall Street Journal. The previous record was $1.87 trillion, set on June 5. The PHLX Semiconductor index had its worst day since the depths of the pandemic, and the selling dragged every sector of the S&P 500 into the red.

Chipmakers, Musk’s companies lead the fall

Nvidia, the company most closely tied to the AI surge, tumbled 9.3%, wiping more than $400 billion off its value and leaving the stock down for the year, the FT and the WSJ reported.

Micron lost 17%, Broadcom 10% and Qualcomm 9.5%, while memory makers SanDisk and Western Digital, among this year’s best performers, dropped 22% and 17%. The Magnificent Seven group of tech giants lost roughly $1 trillion in combined value, according to the WSJ.

The rout reached beyond technology. Caterpillar slid 6.4%, and Walmart fell 1.1%. Tesla dropped 10.8% and SpaceX 9.1%, extending losses from Wednesday, with both companies tied to Elon Musk’s Texas operations, including the planned Terafab chip plant.

Data-center fears meet a concentrated market

Investors dumped shares on fears that newly elected Democrats would restrain the data-center expansion that underpins AI spending.

Michigan’s senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed has called for a “full-on pause” in frontier AI development, and South Carolina’s incoming senator Annie Andrews has proposed a two-year ban on new data-center construction.

In Texas, which has more planned data-center projects than any other state, Democratic governor-elect Gina Hinojosa wants new approvals halted until the Legislature can pass protections next year, the WSJ reported.

JonesTrading’s chief market strategist Mike O’Rourke told WSJ that next year’s earnings forecasts “can no longer be trusted” because AI infrastructure companies, especially chipmakers, drive S&P 500 earnings growth.

The scale of the fall reflects how top-heavy the market has become. The ten largest companies, dominated by the technology giants at the center of the AI buildout, made up 40.8% of the S&P 500 as of May 18, according to JP Morgan Asset Management. That was up from 26.6% at the peak of the dot-com bubble, and the ten generated just over a third of the index’s earnings. A shock to the spending plans behind a handful of firms therefore moves the whole market.

Goldman Sachs estimated in April that AI-linked stocks accounted for nearly 45% of the S&P 500, up from about 25% in 2022.

Trump blames voters and Democrats

Trump blamed the Democrats for the crash in posts on Truth Social on Thursday evening. He wrote that the market fell because the “Dumocrats” had a big Tuesday and told voters they “only have yourselves to blame.”

He added that Americans’ 401(k) retirement accounts had dropped as a result, and promised that the United States would soon be “bigger and stronger than ever before.”

Rout spreads to Asia

Japan’s Nikkei 225 fell 6% on Friday, its worst day since Trump launched his trade war in April 2025, leaving it 20% below its June peak.

Taiwan’s Taiex, dominated by chipmaker TSMC, dropped 4.5% and is also 20% below its October peak, putting both markets in bear territory.

South Korea’s Kospi fell 6%, after diving as much as 8.5% in early trade, which triggered a circuit breaker that halted trading for 20 minutes, AFP reported.

Memory chip makers took the heaviest losses. SK Hynix slid 10.8% and Samsung Electronics 6.4%, while SoftBank Group, which holds roughly 13% of OpenAI, plunged 10.4%. In early trading, Tokyo Electron fell about 9% and Kioxia 13%.

“There’s nowhere to hide,” Lotus Asset Management’s chief investment officer Hao Hong told FT, adding that the correction was “far from finished.” Another Asia investment chief cited by FT said many investors were being forced out of their technology positions by risk limits.

Europe falls less

The Stoxx Europe 600 and the FTSE 100 both opened 1.5% lower on Friday, after the Stoxx index slipped only 0.4% on Thursday. Europe has little direct exposure to AI stocks, and ASML fell just 0.3% at the open, with the technology sub-index down under 1%.

The weakness spread further than technology, however. More than 90% of Stoxx 600 stocks were in the red in early trading, with retail and healthcare shares down around 2%.

Lombard Odier’s multi-asset portfolio manager Florian Ielpo said the AI de-rating had turned into a broad de-risking, raising the question of how long it would last.

US stock futures signaled a calmer start on Friday, with Nasdaq 100 contracts up 0.3% and S&P 500 contracts 0.4% lower. Whether the pause holds depends on how fast Democrats move on data-center curbs and how much of this year’s AI spending plans survive them.