Thursday, June 20, 2024

Ill-fitting Coalition: Why South Africa's Unity Government is Good for Africa

THURSDAY JUNE 20 2024

By Abdisaid M. Ali

South Africa’s elections, last month, showed us new things. The African National Congress (ANC) failed to get a clear majority for the first time since 1994. It was then compelled into the formation of an unprecedented coalition government.

President Cyril Ramaphosa, who won his second term, invited parties, including the Democratic Alliance (DA) and the Inkatha Freedom Party (IFP), to form a national unity government.

The general sense appears to be that the ANC’s failure to get a majority is evidence of growing democracy and stronger ownership of political processes by citizens who are making their votes count.

Yet there are many who have warned against the coalition, arguing that it would undo all the good achievements of the ANC and make critical issues around land, migration, foreign policy and others difficult to tackle. This is because ANC and the DA have always been at odds on these issues, historically.

There is something good in this ‘convenient marriage’, however.  Some observers have rightly considered it a success story for South Africa, and maybe Africa as a whole. The ANC and DA are two parties that have primarily seen each other as enemies. Now it sounds like a great milestone that they are able to hold dialogue with each other, find common ground, and see a future where they work together for South Africa. It could be the best direction for South Africa to take.

In Africa, such Governments of National Unity (GNU) have often arisen out of conflicts as a compromise power-sharing arrangement to end war or solve a disputed election. We have seen it in South Sudan after the signing of the revitalised peace agreement in 2018. We also saw it in Kenya after the 2008 post-election violence. Zimbabwe too had some form of government of national unity.

The ANC, however, reached out to partners even when the election result was not in dispute. It did so to turn its internal crisis into a national crisis. That may not be fair to South Africans. From a conflict prevention perspective, however, going the coalition/GNU route was a better option.

That it went for an arch-enemy was also telling. But perhaps it was because choices were limited.

On the other hand, the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) party of Jacob Zuma, which started shortly before the election and received competitive votes, made it the third largest party in the country that could roil the ANC further. Some argue that the MK is simply another faction of the ANC, in essence, and that its success represents the deep-rooted divisions and discontent that were problematic within the ANC.

The votes that the MK party received may have mostly come from the ANC voters tired of the Mandela party. The MK party apparently also told voters they were still the ANC, just not the ANC of President Ramaphosa. They would work with the ANC if Ramaphosa was ousted. So that means the growth of the MK primarily is the loss of the ANC.

From this perspective, the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF)’s loss, as some claim (it still maintained its position), we have just witnessed a split of the ANC. The ANC hence avoided reuniting with those it split with in the first place.

But why is ANC avoiding the devils (EFF, MK) they know? In fact, it got into union with another devil they knew. The coalition with DA was unimaginable given the huge differences in the origins and policies of both parties. The DA to some degree represented the legacy of apartheid, given its white majority orientation. It also pursued free market liberalism and a desire to westernise South Africa. The ANC, on the other hand, represented the legacy of the liberation struggle from apartheid and a continuous fight for justice and transformation with reference to South Africa’s history.

On the other hand, the GNU could force diverse opposition parties to rally together to check the GNU’s excesses. So far, the MK party is seeking its own coalitions to form a strong opposition against the current government. One possibility is that we might just see an emerging EFF-like opposition to the coalition, but with less friendly goals and policies than the EFF.

Now that parliamentarians have been sworn in and a president elected, they have the authority to govern but need to also critically engage questions around how the coalition agreements are finalised. The events of the past weeks continue to, in my view, position South Africa uniquely within the African continent as exemplifying peaceful, free and fair electoral processes, adherence to the constitution and rule of law, and a growing democracy that is resilient and adapts to difficult situations and change.

While President Ramaphosa may have some weaknesses, his handling of the post-election situation and going the dialogue and collaboration route is true to his character. Through this action, South Africa sets an example of peaceful transitions, inclusivity, bridging divides and conflict prevention. The call for GNU is pragmatic and prevents conflicts.

It pursues collaboration over tensions and creates an environment for stability for the economy to remain stable and thrive. It also gives South Africa to approach critical bipartisan issues more collaboratively.

Abdisaid M. Ali is the chairperson of Lomé Peace and Security Forum, Former Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and Former National Security Advisor, Somalia.

Kenya’s Anti-tax Demos Spread Across Cities and Towns

THURSDAY JUNE 20 2024   

Youths demonstrate in Eldoret town

Youths demonstrate in Eldoret town, Uasin Gishu, while agitating for rejection of the Finance Bill on June 20, 2024. Jared Nyataya | Nation Media Group

By NATION AFRICA

Anti-Finance Bill protests in Kenya have spread from the capital Nairobi to various parts of the country, as taxpayers continue to oppose President William Ruto’s plan to finance his Ksh3.9 trillion ($31 billion) Budget.

On Thursday morning, street demos returned to the streets of Nairobi after a 24-hour break, with armed police firing teargas to disperse protesters.

The officers engaged crowds of mostly youthful demonstrators, who were attempting to access Parliament Buildings, in running battles.

Anti-riot police blocked several roads near Parliament to man it and ensure no civilians access it.

“We shall use other ways to get to Parliament and occupy it,” a protester said.

Similar demos were witnessed in other cities and towns— including Kisumu, Lodwar, Kakamega, Kisii, Nakuru, Eldoret, Nyeri, Meru, Nanyuki, Mombasa and Kilifi at the Coast.

The protesters, who forced Dr Ruto to climb down on some of his tax measures, now want the entire bill shot down by the members of Parliament.

“Don’t Amend, Reject! Ruto Must Go!,” they chanted as they engaged police in cat-and-mouse games in Nairobi’s Central Business District.

In Dr Ruto’s hometown of Eldoret, thousands of youthful protesters poured on the streets, bringing business in the town to a standstill.

The large crowds that took part in #OccupyEldoret demos mimicked the sea of humanity that was witnessed during celebration of President Ruto’s 2022 election win, and when he was sworn into office.

The demonstrators caused excitement in the town, with onlookers expressing support for their push to have the Kenya Kwanza administration drop punitive taxes in Finance Bill 2024.

As witnessed in Nairobi and other cities, the majority of the protestors in Eldoret were the Generation Zs, with a few millennials joining them in the demos that appeared to be very organised.

Waving protest placards and chanting anti-Finance Bill, anti-Ruto, anti-government tunes, the protesters had initially organised themselves into about four groups of several hundred before converging at different spots on the outskirts of the town.

The messages were strong: Ruto Must Go! Occupy Eldoret! Reject Finance Bill!

The protesters called out their elected leaders as they warned that they would keenly watch MPs as they vote on the bill on Thursday afternoon.

The demos were mostly peaceful, with no single case of tear gas canisters being lobbed as police walked alongside the protesters.

While there was a heavy presence of police, the law enforcement officers were peacefully guiding and protecting the demonstrators.

In Kilifi County, thousands of youths poured into the streets to add their voices against the Finance Bill 2024.

While chanting slogans against the bill and the Kenya Kwanza regime at large, the protesters crisscrossed the streets of Kilif, bringing business to a standstill.

Although the protests earlier started with students, mainly from Pwani University, the crowd grew as it marched along the streets, joined by some of the residents and boda boda riders.

The protesters, dressed in black outfits, walked from Pwani University to the town market, along Kilifi bridge and back to the town, where they made stopovers driving their point home.

For a moment, they also blocked access to the Kilifi Huduma Centre and later on headed to the governor’s office.

In Voi, Taita Taveta County, the protests against the Finance Bill that had been planned by various groups failed to gain the momentum as expected.

Despite a group of youths showing up to demonstrate, the protests were short-lived as the crowd failed to draw more protesters.

However, law enforcement officers were seen conducting patrols in Voi town to deter any potential acts of lawlessness.

In Mombasa, protesters who had participated in the Wednesday’s gathering marched on Moi Avenue to oppose the bill.

In Kisumu, protests turned ugly after a section of the demonstrators engaged police in running battles.

The law enforcers were forced fire tear gas canisters at demonstrators to disperse them.

The protests started early in the morning at the famous Kondele Roundabout, with hundreds of residents, donning black outfits and waving placards, converging there.

The protesters later marched to the central business district via Kenyatta Avenue where they disrupted traffic.

They passed through Kibuye market, the main Kisumu Bus Park, Ang’awa Street before finding their way into the CBD through Oginga Odinga Street.

Some businesses were quickly closed down when the demonstrators, in the hundreds, poured into the CBD.

Youth hold peaceful protests along Kenyatta Avenue in Nakuru town. Boniface Mwangi | Nation Media Group

Earlier, City Manager Abala Wanga had warned the police against the use of excessive force, and the protestors against destruction of property and vandalism.

“It is imperative that the security personnel exercise restraint and avoid the use of excessive force against peaceful demonstrators. Their primary role should be to prevent any unlawful activities, such as vandalism or disruption of businesses,” said Mr Wanga.

According to Mr Obungu Owich, who was among those leading the protest in Kisumu, the residents decided to join the rest of the country in making their voices heard.

“We are asking the president to consider the plight of Kenyans and reduce the high cost of living. We reject the proposed Finance Bill in totality,” said Mr Owich.

In Nakuru, hundreds of residents took to the streets to protest against the Finance Bill, 2024, and the high cost of living.

Youths protest along Kimathi Street.

The protesters want MPs to reject the bill during the Thursday session.

In Embu, scores of residents accused the government of oppressing Kenyans.

Tension ran high as the demonstrators loudly shouted in protest, demanding that President William Ruto pack up and go home.

"Ruto must go! Ruto must go!" they shouted as they paralysed transport in the usually busy town.

The protesters accused the government of overburdening Kenyans with more taxes despite the prevailing high cost of living.

" This government does not care about us, these taxes are punitive and we shall not accept them," one of the protesters said.

They vowed to continue protesting until their demands are met.

Reports by Caroline Wafula, Loise Wangui, Eric Matara, Mercy Koskei, Harry Misiko, Wachira Mwangi, Lucy Mkanyika, Rushdie Oudia, Hilary Kimuyu, Jurgen Nambeka, Valentine Obara, George Munene and Evans Jaola.

Russia-Vietnam Joint Statement Following Putin’s Visit: Key Provisions

Russia and Vietnam "consistently strengthen the comprehensive strategic partnership in the spirit of friendship and mutual assistance amid the tough international situation"

© Gavriil Grigorov/Russian Presidential Press and Information Office/TASS

MOSCOW, June 20. /TASS/. Russia and Vietnam have issued a joint statement following President Vladimir Putin’s visit to Hanoi, in which the sides outlined plans for further cooperation and interaction in the international arena.

Putin invited the Vietnamese authorities to visit Russia at any convenient time, and the invitation was accepted.

TASS has summarized the main provisions of the document.

Support for Putin’s foreign policy

Vietnam welcomes Vladimir Putin's re-election as Russian president in spring 2024 and believes that his re-election speaks volumes about how the Russian people feel about the direction the country is headed.

This support is due, among other things, to the foreign policy course, "an important direction of which is the development of cooperation with Vietnam."

Strengthening cooperation

Russia and Vietnam "consistently strengthen the comprehensive strategic partnership in the spirit of friendship and mutual assistance amid the tough international situation." Moscow and Hanoi "pay great attention to direct inter-regional ties, exchanges through non-governmental and party organizations, advocate making more efficient the existing formats and mechanisms of cooperation and, if necessary, creating new ones."

The sides agreed to step up economic cooperation, so they will create a high-level working group on priority investment projects.

Russia promised to speed up the construction of the Center of Nuclear Science and Technology. In addition, the sides advocated stepping up cooperation in tourism, "including by increasing the number of direct scheduled and charter flights between the two countries and simplifying conditions for mutual travel of citizens."

Fight with terrorism

Moscow and Hanoi support the development of an international convention to combat biological and chemical terrorism. Vietnam also condemned the terrorist attack on the Moscow Region’s Crocus City Hall in March 2024 and expressed solidarity with Russia in the fight against terrorists and extremists.

Asia-Pacific region security architecture

Interaction in the defense and security spheres "is of special importance in Russia-Vietnam relations. At the same time, "it is not directed against third countries and is characterized by a high level of mutual trust and is implemented in strict compliance with the principles and norms of the international legal system."

The goal of this partnership is "ensuring peace, stability and sustainable development" in the Asia-Pacific region and the world as a whole. Moscow and Hanoi support ensuring equal and indivisible security on the basis of non-aligned principles in the Asia-Pacific region.

Promoting multipolar world order

Russia and Vietnam will contribute to establishing a just multipolar world order based on the UN Charter.

The sides emphasize that "international obligations in connection with the immunity of the heads of state and their property must be strictly observed."

Information

Russia and Vietnam note common approaches to ensuring information security and agree to deepen cooperation in this sphere.

The sides will develop the international legal basis in this sphere and help each other in combating crimes committed with the help of information technologies. The sides support UN efforts to develop an international convention on combating cybercrime.

Space arms race

The sides voiced concern about the "threat of an arms race in outer space." Russia and Vietnam favor negotiating a treaty to prevent the placement of weapons in space.

ASEAN's role

Russia and Vietnam support strengthening the central role of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in the system of interstate relations in the Asia-Pacific region. Also, Moscow and Hanoi will promote increased cooperation between ASEAN, the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).

Ukrainian crisis

Russia highly appreciates Vietnam's balanced and objective position on the Ukrainian crisis. Moscow welcomes Vietnam's readiness to join international efforts to find ways to "peacefully and reliably resolve the conflict."

Middle East conflict

Russia and Vietnam are in favor of strengthening stability in the Middle East and are against interference in the region's internal affairs. The countries support the establishment of an independent Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

Interaction in BRICS

Moscow will continue to work to strengthen ties "between BRICS members and developing countries, including Vietnam."

Historic Event Demonstrating Friendship, Unity and Genuine Relations of Comrades-in-Arms Between Peoples of DPRK and Russia

Grand Ceremony Held to Welcome President of Russian Federation

Hundreds of Thousands of Pyongyang Citizens Greet President of Russian Federation as Highest Honoured Guest of State

Pyongyang, the capital city of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea, has greeted a goodwill mission of the fraternal Russian people as the highest honoured guests of the state and is filled with a welcoming atmosphere.

Large portraits of Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin were displayed on the front walls of high-rise apartment buildings and skyscrapers in the capital city, draped with the national flags of the DPRK and the Russian Federation. Seen in different parts of the city were posters and signboards bearing such slogans and catchphrases as “Welcome President Vladimir Putin of the Russian Federation”, “Welcome Putin”, “Long Live Invincible DPRK-Russia Friendship and Unity!” and “The DPRK-Russia Friendship Is Everlasting!”

Both sides of streets extending scores of kilometres, decorated with beautiful flowerbeds, flags and buntings, were crowded with a large number of people from all walks of life who came out to greet the dearest friends from a friendly neighbouring country.

Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin’s presidential limousine, which, escorted by motorcycles, left the Kumsusan State Guesthouse, was given a rapturous welcome by Pyongyang citizens along the route.

The citizens enthusiastically waved the national flags of the two countries and bouquets, chanting welcoming slogans with warm feelings about the militant kinship between the DPRK and Russia which are boldly opening up the new horizon of friendly and cooperative relations through whole-hearted mutual support and selfless encouragement for the joint cause despite geographical differences.

On Ryomyong and Kaeson streets and along the road at the foot of Moran Hill, where the Liberation Tower symbolic of the militant friendship between the peoples of the DPRK and Russia stands, and on other streets citizens expressed their deep respect for and trust in Putin.

A ceremony for welcoming the president of the Russian Federation took place at Kim Il Sung Square on June 19.

The national flags of the DPRK and the Russian Federation were fluttering and the guard of honour of the Korean People’s Army, the honorary cavalry and the central military band of the Ministry of National Defence lined up at the square elaborately decorated for the day’s grand ceremony.

Present there were Kim Tok Hun, vice-president of the State Affairs Commission of the DPRK and premier of the Cabinet, Choe Ryong Hae, first vice-president of the State Affairs Commission of the DPRK and chairman of the Standing Committee of the Supreme People’s Assembly, Choe Son Hui, foreign minister of the DPRK, secretaries of the Central Committee of the WPK and other senior officials of the Party and the government.

Also present at the ceremony were Kang Sun Nam, minister of National Defence of the DPRK, and other commanding officers of the ministry.

Pyongyangites, service personnel of the KPA, youth and students and children stood with the national flags of the two countries and bouquets in their hands.

Kim Jong Un, general secretary of the Workers’ Party of Korea and president of the State Affairs of the DPRK, came to the venue for the ceremony.

At 12:00 President Putin’s limousine arrived at Kim Il Sung Square.

The respected Comrade Kim Jong Un warmly greeted Comrade Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin amid the playing of welcome music.

Kim Jong Un introduced the leading officials of the Party, government and military to Putin.

Kim Jong Un exchanged greetings with Foreign Minister of Russian Federation Sergei Lavrov, First Deputy Prime Minister Denis Mantrov, Deputy Prime Minister Alexandr Nobak, Deputy Head of the Presidential Administration and President’s Press Secretary Dmitri Peskov, Aide to the President of Russia for Foreign Policy Yuri Ushakov, Minister of Defense Andrei Beloussov, Minister of Natural Resources and Ecology and Chairman of the Russian Side of the Russia-DPRK Inter-Governmental Committee for Cooperation in Trade, Economy, Science and Technology Alexandr Kozlov, Minister of Health Mikhail Murashuko, Minister of Transport Roman Starovoyt and other entourage members of the Russian side.

A ceremony of welcoming the Russian president began.

When Kim Jong Un took the platform together with Putin, a 21-gun salute was fired amid the playing of the national anthems of the Russian Federation and the DPRK.

Putin received a salute from the head of the guard of honour of the KPA.

Guided by Kim Jong Un, Putin reviewed the guard of honour of the KPA.

There took place a march-past of the guard of honour of the KPA.

At the end of the ceremony, a large number of balloons were released into the sky amid rousing cheers, beautifully decorating the bright sky of June.

Jets of the KPA Air Force flew past the sky above the square, giving off tricolor trails symbolic of the national flag of the Russian Federation.

Putin expressed his heartfelt thanks to Kim Jong Un for paying close attention to his Pyongyang visit and lavishing cordial hospitality on him.

Kim Jong Un and Putin took an open limousine amid a sea of dancers sweeping the square.

The people cheered enthusiastically, looking up to the top leaders who have more firmly cemented the durable and genuine ties of friendship between the DPRK and Russia with a long history and traditions and confidently led them to the road of comprehensive and strategic development as required by the new era.

The top leaders of the DPRK and Russia warmly acknowledged the cheering crowds.

The ceremony of welcoming Russian President Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin on his visit to the DPRK at time-honoured Kim Il Sung Square was recorded as a historic event that clearly demonstrated the friendship, unity and genuine relations of comrades-in-arms between the peoples of the two countries.

KCNA

2024-06-20

Agreements Between Governments of DPRK and Russian Federation Signed

Agreements were signed between the governments of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation on building a motorcar bridge over the Tuman River on the DPRK-Russia border and on cooperation in the fields of public health, medical education and science.

Present at the signing ceremony held at the Mansudae Assembly Hall were Kim Kyong Jun, minister of Land and Environment Protection, Jong Mu Rim, minister of Public Health, and officials of the Foreign Ministry from the DPRK side.

Present there from the Russian side were Minister of Transport Roman Starovoyt, Minister of Health Mikhail Murashuko, working officials and staff members of the Russian embassy in Pyongyang, the capital of the DPRK.

Kim Kyong Jun and Jong Mu Rim signed the agreements respectively on behalf of the DPRK government, and Roman Starovoyt and Mikhail Murashuko on behalf of the government of the Russian Federation.

KCNA

2024-06-20

Russia Sees its Agreements with North Korea as Deterrent — Putin

The Russian leader noted the treaty between Russia and North Korea was almost identical to the bilateral pact that had previously expired

© Kristina Kormilitsyna/POOL/TASS

HANOI, June 20. /TASS/. Moscow expects that its agreements with Pyongyang will deter the crisis in the Korean Peninsula from escalating into a hot phase, Russian President Vladimir Putin told reporters.

"The Korean crisis is a simmering crisis. But we assume and hope that our agreements with the Democratic People's Republic of Korea will serve as a deterrent to a certain extent to prevent this crisis from escalating into a hot phase," he said.

Putin said the treaty between Russia and North Korea is almost identical to the bilateral pact that previously expired.

"So, there is nothing new here," the president said.

When asked why North Korean leader Kim Jong Un decided to sign the treaty when an "undeclared war is being waged against Russia," Putin replied: "You ask him that.".

Sanctions and Peace Initiatives: What Putin Told Reporters in Hanoi

Possible changes in Russia’s nuclear doctrine, a treaty on military aid with North Korea, peace initiatives and sanctions were among the issues raised by the Russian president

Russia's President Vladimir Putin Vladimir Smirnov/POOL/TASS

© Vladimir Smirnov/POOL/TASS

HANOI, June 21. /TASS/. Possible changes in Russia’s nuclear doctrine, a treaty on military aid with North Korea, peace initiatives and sanctions were among the issues raised by Russian President Vladimir Putin when he concluded his visit to Vietnam.

TASS gathered the Russian leader’s key statements

Treaty on strategic partnership with North Korea

Russia has signed a strategic partnership treaty with North Korea to replace the old one, and there is "nothing new" about it. "Of course, in modern-day conditions it looks particularly resonant in some way, but nevertheless we have changed almost nothing," Putin said. "The Democratic People's Republic of Korea has similar treaties with other countries as well."

Moscow expects its agreements with Pyongyang to "serve as a deterrent to a certain extent" that will prevent the Korean crisis "from escalating into a hot phase."

Countries that deliver weapons to the Kiev regime take no responsibility for their future use, and, in this context, Moscow reserves the right to supply weapons to other countries and regions: "Given our agreements with North Korea, I do not rule this out."

Commenting on a recent Wall Street Journal report that said the US hadn’t anticipated the agreement, Putin said: "We are talking about it openly, and you don't need to do electronic intelligence or engage assets for intelligence to understand where things are going."

Special military operation

Russia has not asked North Korea for help in the conflict with Ukraine, and Pyongyang has never offered it.

The mutual defense pact with North Korea applies "in the event of aggression, military aggression," but "the Ukrainian regime did not start aggression against Russia." "It started aggression against the Donetsk and Lugansk people's republics that we recognized as independent - before they became part of the Russian Federation," the Russian president said.

Ukrainian attempts to drive out Russian forces from the Kharkov Region at any price "will again cost the Ukrainian armed forces very dearly." The West is pushing Ukraine into driving the Russian forces out of the region so that it can later be declared a "major success of 2024." At the same time, Russia has no goal of approaching Kharkov. The Russian armed forces are prepared for "all possible developments" on the frontline.

Peace initiatives

Russia’s preconditions for peace talks will change depending on the situation on the ground. Russia is ready to negotiate a settlement of the Ukrainian conflict as early as tomorrow, its proposals "are on the table," and it does not matter where the negotiations will take place: in Minsk, Istanbul or Switzerland.

However, the negotiations "will never happen" if Kiev continues to name the withdrawal of Russian troops among its essential preconditions.

West’s response to Russia’s peace initiatives was expected: " I think that some level-headed politicians will think about whether my proposals are realistic enough, unbiased, and in accord with the interests of all contracting parties."

Kiev government

The incumbent Kiev government is reluctant to give up power and, therefore, has no plans of holding elections in accordance with Ukraine’s constitution: "They will keep delaying a ceasefire, they are interested in our military presence in these territories, because they are not interested in holding elections."

NATO in Asia

The bloc system is becoming more active in Asia, NATO is practically ‘moving’ to the region, which poses a security threat to Russia and demands a response. "We see what is going on in Asia: the bloc system is being put together. NATO is practically moving there permanently. This, of course, poses a threat to all countries in the region, including Russia. We are obliged to respond to this, and we will do so," Putin said.

South Korea’s concerns

The Republic of Korea has nothing to worry about the new Russian-DPRK treaty, because Russian military aid "will happen only in case of an aggression against one signatory." the Russian leader said. South Korea does not plan an aggression against North Korea, which means "there is no need to be afraid of our cooperation in this area."

Possible changes in nuclear doctrine

Russia’s strategic nuclear forces are always in a state of full combat readiness, and that is why "what is being done now in the Western countries is of little concern to us." "But we are watching it closely and, in case of any threats begin to grow, we will respond properly and proportionately," Putin added.

However, unfriendly countries are working to create new elements of weapons to lower the threshold for activating their nuclear weapons, so Russia is now considering amendments to its nuclear doctrine. "This is because new elements are arising - at least we know that the potential adversary is working on it - related to lowering the threshold for using nuclear weapons. In particular, ultra-low-power nuclear explosive devices are being developed."

However, Russia has no intentions to include a provision on the possibility of a preemptive nuclear strike into its nuclear doctrine, because a retaliatory strike will be enough to destroy the enemy.

West’s pressure

West’s regime of sanctions against North Korea is inhumane and reminiscent of the Siege of Leningrad. "The sanctions that are introduced, first of all for political reasons in this case, must correspond to the current level of humanity’s development," he said. We all need to think together about how and what needs to be changed in this sanction regime, and whether it generally meets the requirements of today."

The intensity of the US government’s policy of pressure and sanctions "is not always beneficial for them." "It harms them from the strategic standpoint, because no one likes snobs." Apparently, the West is fuelling the escalation in the hope of intimidating Russia and forcing it to give up, but this will mean "an end to the millennia-old history" of the Russian state. "So, a question arises: what’s the point in being scared. Would not it be better to find to the end in this case?"

Russia has learned how to cope with sanctions: "In fact, we are succeeding in all areas. There are certain difficulties, but there are also ways to resolve all these difficulties."

United Nations

The global situation is changing, and this necessitates a reform of the United Nations, which should be "based on broad consensus," not on "behind-the-scenes decisions made by a group of nations." Otherwise, the UN Security Council will lose its ability to be "an instrument for settling disputes."

Cooperation with Vietnam

Russia can both produce liquefied natural gas in Vietnam and supply it to the country from its territory. "There are different options here: we can take part in the construction of the appropriate liquefaction capacities, or we can supply our liquefied gas from the territory of the Russian Federation. Either way, it’s possible, there are prospects here, there are corresponding blocks where we can operate and produce liquefied natural gas.".

Russian National Team Wins Medal Count of BRICS Games

Russian athletes have won 173 gold medals

Belarus' Niurgun Skriabin and Russia's Kurban Shirayev Yegor Aleyev/TASS

© Yegor Aleyev/TASS

KAZAN, June 20. /TASS/. The Russian national team has become an early winner of the medal count of the BRICS Games taking place in Kazan.

Russian athletes have won 173 gold medals. The Belarusian national team ranks second, its athletes have received 32 gold medals. Another 140 sets of medals remain to be played at the BRICS Games, with Belarusian athletes not participating in two disciplines. A total 387 sets of medals will be played at the BRICS Games.

Russians also have 101 silver and 69 bronze medals. Belarusians have won 56 silver and 68 bronze medals. The Chinese team ranks third with 17 gold, 17 silver and 12 bronze medals.

The BRICS Games will conclude on June 23.

Malawi: Chilima's Family Wants Govt to Institute a Comprehensive Inquiry Into the Plane Crash

Saulos Klaus Chilima, vice-président du Malawi

16 JUNE 2024

Nyasa Times (Leeds)

The departed Vice-President Saulos Chilima's brother Ben Chilima has asked government to institute a "comprehensive" inquiry into the plane crash that killed him and eight others.

This he said will help the country to avoid an accident of similar nature in future.

In his eulogy, the brother also disclosed that all belongings that were found at the site of the crash including watch, wedding ring, rosary, prayer book, phone and clothes have been handed to the family.

Ben said the family is grateful for the support offered to them during this painful moment.

He has also thanked to all the people who helped to search for Chilima and others in Chikangawa Forest during that tragic plane crash.

"We want to say thank you to the clergy who gave us the support after the announcement of plane missing till the death of our brother. We are grateful to the pathologists who did the autopsy.

"As the family we want to go further with the investigation with the incident that led to the plane crush and autopsy," Chilima said.

Ben further said his brother passionately hated corruption and any of his family members using his name to get favours.

Western Sahara's Battle for Independence Gains New Lease of Life

Marc B. Sanganee

20th June 2024, 07:18 GMT

Life under occupation is a constant struggle. This is continually expressed at the international media conference in a refugee camp in Western Sahara. The conference took place starting May 15 and was organized by the Sahrawi Union of Journalists and Writers (UPES).

Western Sahara is occupied by Morocco, a country where King Muhammad VI has full control over Morocco's armed forces, judiciary, and all foreign policy.

In Western Sahara, the Moroccan monarchy violates the human rights of the Sahrawi people. Children suffer from malnutrition, journalists are thrown in prison, and international observers are denied access to the occupied territories.

Morocco's colonization of Western Sahara has been going on since 1975; however, the occupation receives little attention from the international community. Through the occupation, Morocco offers trade opportunities to Western companies while the Moroccan intelligence service uses Israeli spyware to monitor the Sahrawis.

But the revolutionary Sahrawi freedom movement-Polisario Front-is not giving up: In 2020, Polisario resumed its armed struggle against Morocco. The Sahrawis hope that a new world order, not dominated by the West, will open up new possibilities in the fight for a free and independent Western Sahara.

Occupied Land

The media conference takes place in Wilayah of Bojador, one of five Sahrawi refugee camps located in Algeria on the border with Western Sahara. Algeria has given the area to Polisario, which administers the refugee camps.

Thus, you could say that Western Sahara is divided into three areas. There are the occupied territories of Western Sahara, where Morocco is in power. There are the liberated areas of Western Sahara, where Polisario is in power. And then there are the refugee camps in Algeria, where Polisario is also in power.

People may have traveled from all over the world to attend the media conference. However, it is the participants from the occupied territories of Western Sahara who receive the most acclaim at the opening of the various debates. This is due to the harsh living conditions in the occupied territories.

After 40 years, still waiting for justice: Western Sahara, Africa's last colony

"Today, many children suffer from malnutrition due to the occupation," says Buhubeini Yahya, head of the non-governmental organization (NGO) Sahrawi Red Crescent (SRC), which operates in the occupied territories.

Problems with malnutrition are partly due to the fact that Morocco currently blocks Polisario's access to the occupied territories, making the freedom movement unable to deliver humanitarian assistance to the local population.

Journalists and Activists

Sahrawi journalists-who want to cover malnutrition among children in the occupied territories, for example-are doing a job that can cost them dearly.

Bhakha*, who works as a journalist in the territories, knows this.

"My colleagues and I are trying to expose Morocco's crimes. But several have been arrested, some have received 27 years in prison," Bhakha says from the stage.

"Moroccan police kidnap journalists and confiscate our phones and cameras. Media people are having their bank accounts blocked and our websites are being cyberattacked," he continues.

Bhakha says that in the occupied territories, Morocco is cracking down on activists who organize demonstrations and speak out against the occupation. According to him, activists have been "thrown off tall buildings" as punishment for protesting.

"The Moroccan authorities have intensified their spate of violations against pro-independence Sahrawi activists through ill-treatment, arrests, detentions, and harassment in an attempt to silence or punish them," the NGO Amnesty International wrote in 2021.

In eight months, Amnesty had recorded "seven cases of torture or other ill-treatment, three house raids, two de facto house arrests and nine cases of arrests, detentions and harassment of individuals in relation to their peaceful exercise of their freedom of expression and assembly."

Tough Prisons

Sukina can't hold back the tears. She is attending the media conference to talk about her brother Hussein, an activist from the occupied territories who has been thrown in prison for speaking out in favor of independence for Western Sahara.

"I find it very difficult to talk about how much my brother is suffering in prison," says Sukina.

Next to Sukina is journalist Mustaffa, who himself was locked up in a Moroccan prison as a political prisoner because he reported on the Moroccan occupation. Mustaffa describes a harsh prison system where inmates live in "miserable conditions" with many diseases circulating.

According to Prison Insider, a prison information platform, human rights organizations are concerned about Morocco's "massive use of torture and ill-treatment of prisoners in Morocco and Western Sahara, where political prisoners are numerous and are particularly vulnerable."

Sukina says that her family has to go through a lot to even see her brother Hussein in the Moroccan prison where he is being held. Just getting to the prison can take more than a day.

"The prison is many kilometers away from my family's home. We have been forced to walk so far that my mother is now suffering from a kidney disease. There is nowhere near the prison where we can stay overnight. We have to go back and forth on the same day," she says.

Sukina continues, "Once we get there, it is not at all certain that the Moroccan prison guards will even let us see my brother. They have rejected us several times with mocking remarks."

"And when they do let us meet with Hussein, it is always too short a meeting [and] under the supervision of the prison guards. My brother is not allowed to say a word about the conditions in the prison," Sukina sighs.

At the media conference in the refugee camp, many local participants express frustration that the international community generally turns a blind eye to Morocco's occupation of Western Sahara.

According to several experts on stage, the lack of focus is due to Morocco offering Western companies access to natural resources and other commercial opportunities in the occupied territories.

Here, European companies are involved-through imports, exports, or the provision of technical services-in phosphate mining, wind power projects, agriculture, and fishing.

The economic exploitation of Western Sahara without the consent of the Sahrawi people is in violation of international law. The Sahrawis have not accepted the economic activities in the occupied territories and do not receive a share of the profits.

In 2017, the Danish shipping companies Ultrabulk and Clipper were caught in a political crossfire when it emerged that the shipping companies were shipping cargo from occupied Western Sahara. Anders Samuelsen, then the Danish foreign minister from the neoliberal party Liberal Alliance, refused to intervene.

In this way, Western companies and governments are helping to maintain the Moroccan occupation of Western Sahara.

Connections to Israel

During the conference, there are repeated expressions of support for the Palestinians who are currently suffering from Israel's genocide. All participants stand up and observe a minute of silence in solidarity with Palestine.

In this way, one occupied people shows solidarity with another. The Sahrawis and the Palestinians are fighting against their respective occupying powers, who are collaborating with each other.

In December 2020, a month before his presidential term expired, Donald Trump declared that the United States now considered all of Western Sahara to be part of Moroccan territory. This is one of the decisions that current U.S. President Joe Biden has chosen not to change.

In exchange for the declaration, the United States demanded that Morocco establish diplomatic relations with Israel. Today, Morocco recognizes Israel as a state and Israel recognizes Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara.

It has also come to light that Morocco is using the Israeli spyware Pegasus to spy on Sahrawi human rights activists.

"Morocco uses Pegasus against all content related to Western Sahara," says Hamada Salma, Minister of Information of Western Sahara.

Armed Struggle Resumed

Although most of the world ignores Morocco's oppression of the Sahrawis, the Sahrawis have not given up.

In 2020, the revolutionary freedom movement Polisario decided to resume its armed struggle against Morocco.

This happened after Morocco broke a long-standing ceasefire dating back to 1991. The ceasefire between Polisario and Morocco was initiated by the UN.

The ceasefire was based on an agreement that the UN would organize a referendum where the Sahrawis would vote on whether they wanted an independent Western Sahara or a Western Sahara integrated into Morocco.

Twenty-nine years later, the referendum had not materialized. And when Morocco broke the ceasefire on November 13, 2020, by launching a military mission against peaceful protesters, Polisario decided to resume the armed struggle.

During the media conference, Polisario soldier Barak Mamir talks about the armed resistance against Morocco. In different regions, the Polisario is attacking Moroccan forces along the "Wall of Shame," a 2,700-kilometer fortification built by Morocco across Western Sahara.

"Since November 13, 2020, we have carried out a total of 3,500 attacks," says Barak Mamir.

Affecting the Economy

According to Barak Mamir, Polisario's attacks against Morocco's military have had a significant effect on the Moroccan economy.

"As a result of our attacks, Morocco has been forced to double its military budget. This means that the price of basic necessities for the average Moroccan has increased significantly," he says.

In 2023, the pan-African news network Africanews reported that the price of vegetables in Moroccan markets was "almost as expensive as in some French supermarkets," even though the minimum wage in France was five times higher than in Morocco.

"The Moroccan regime is doing everything it can to keep the cost of the conflict out of the public eye," says Barak Mimir from the stage.

This also applies when Moroccan soldiers fall in battle.

Fighting for Freedom

"When a family in Morocco is informed that their son has been killed in action, they are told not to post anything about it on social media," says Barak Mimir.

According to him, several Moroccan soldiers have also been prosecuted for choosing to flee instead of fighting the Polisario. Dozens of Moroccan soldiers have even left the military in opposition to the Moroccan monarchy.

This has happened even though the Moroccan military is armed with state-of-the-art military technology such as drones.

A Polisario soldier explains that there are significant differences between Moroccan and Sahrawi soldiers:

"The soldiers from Western Sahara know the country, and we fight for the freedom of our people. Moroccan soldiers, on the other hand, have not chosen to fight but have been forced to do so as part of their job."

According to the soldier, this is one of the reasons why Polisario has managed to break through the Wall of Shame, which is divided into a series of lines: barbed wire, dogs, a moat, the wall itself, 150,000 soldiers and 8 million landmines.

In one of the refugee camps is the Museum of Resistance, where visitors can see several of the tanks, artillery systems, and other weapons that Polisario soldiers have managed to take from the Moroccan army after breaking through the wall.

But for a revolutionary freedom movement, fighting against a Moroccan military power armed with modern weapons that have primarily been produced in the West is no walk in the park. Many Sahrawis have fallen in battle.

It's not that the Sahrawis want war either. The goal is to be able to live in an independent and peaceful Western Sahara, it is repeated several times at the media conference.

The new multipolar world order, where non-Western powers have more and more say, is seen by several participants at the conference as a positive development that can open the door for the liberation of Western Sahara.

Morocco has historically benefited from the unipolar world order, which for decades after the end of the Cold War in 1991 was dominated by the United States. This allowed Morocco to occupy Western Sahara without consequences.

But now a new world order is emerging, and it is making its presence felt in Western Sahara's neighborhood. Countries like Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso have thrown out Western soldiers from the United States and France, respectively, to strengthen cooperation with Russia.

"New powers are emerging, more different countries are rising up. The multipolar world, where the U.S. does not dominate, will strengthen Western Sahara's struggle for liberation," says Syrian Mahmoud Al-Saleh, chairman of the Arab Committee of Solidarity with the Sahrawi People.

A Sahrawi journalist says that Polisario's struggle against the Moroccan occupation is receiving better coverage in non-Western media such as Russia Today, a state-owned Russian media that is also participating in this media conference.

"There is a long way to go before the international community becomes objective. If you only had access to Western media, the world would see us as terrorists," says the journalist.

This article was produced by Globetrotter. Marc B. Sanganee is editor-in-chief of Arbejderen, an online newspaper in Denmark.

Source: Globetrotter

*Disclaimer: Some conference participants are referred to by first name only and names in the article may not be spelled correctly.

Ramaphosa Sworn in as South African President After Reelection

By Al Mayadeen English

19 Jun 2024 18:14

During the inauguration ceremony, Ramaphosa swore to be "faithful to the Republic of South Africa, and will obey, observe, uphold and maintain the Constitution and all other law of the Republic."

Reelected South African President Cyril Ramaphosa was inaugurated in on Wednesday, pledging to uphold and enforce the republic's fundamental and other laws.

Ramaphosa was reelected for a second term by lawmakers, following a historic coalition agreement between his African National Congress (ANC) of the late Nelson Mandela and the Democratic Alliance (DA), setting aside their long-standing rivalry.

Ramaphosa secured the late Friday vote with 283 votes, defeating Julius Malema, leader of the far-left Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF), who received 44 votes.

During the inauguration ceremony, Ramaphosa swore to be " faithful to the Republic of South Africa, and will obey, observe, uphold and maintain the Constitution and all other law of the Republic."

The National Assembly reelected Ramaphosa as president last week after his African National Congress (ANC), which has been in power since the first post-apartheid election in 1994, forged a national unity government with two smaller parties.

Although leading opposition parties such as MK Party and the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have their roots in the ANC, the parties have starkly set themselves apart due to past in-party disputes that led to the formation of MK and EFF. 

Historically, the ANC, led by President Cyril Ramaphosa, and the DA have been rivals, with the DA leading the opposition from 1999 until the 2024 elections. On the other hand, the ANC, coming out of the South African revolution led by Nelson Mandela, has held a near majority position in the South African National Assembly since 1994. 

However, this year, the ANC suffered a resounding setback of 71 seats in the National Congress, forcing it to form a coalition government with the DA. 

Hunger is Rapidly Getting Worse in Gaza

Ruwaida Amer 

The Electronic Intifada 

17 June 2024

Searching for food puts enormous strain on Gaza’s people.  Omar AshtawyAPA images

An especially bizarre example of propaganda has been published by the Israeli military over the past few days.

Despite how it is perpetrating a genocide in Gaza, the army boasted of conducting “humanitarian aid efforts” throughout the current war.

Palestinians have not witnessed any work by Israel that could accurately be categorized as “humanitarian.”

Amani Labad has been in the northern part of Gaza since the war began. She has been uprooted many times.

“I have been fighting all kinds of death,” Amani said. “Death from violence and from severe hunger.”

Her family can only eat one meal a day.

“The army has bulldozed the agricultural lands and there are no vegetables in the markets,” she said.

Amani is extremely worried that one or more of her four children could die from malnutrition.

“I am very tired of being displaced from one place to another, searching for safety for my children,” she said. “And then comes the suffering of searching for food as well.”

Ahmad Kurd is from Jabaliya refugee camp in northern Gaza.

“I have 10 grandchildren and I cannot bear to hear them crying from hunger,” he said.

“It is very painful.”

“How long will we remain in this situation?” he added. “We are all so tired.”

For a number of months, the problems of hunger and malnutrition were more acute in northern Gaza than in the south.

Yet the World Food Programme has now warned that the situation in southern Gaza is “quickly deteriorating.”

Israel’s invasion of Rafah has meant that the crossing between that city and Egypt is closed. Far less food is entering Gaza as a result.

Rami Labda is from Khan Younis, another city in southern Gaza.

“They have closed the crossing and left us to die,” he said.

“I have a child with very weak immunity because of malnutrition,” Rami added. “He craves fruit and asks me for some every day but I am unable to provide it.”

Echoing a widespread view, Rami said, “Why do they not want the war to stop? Sometimes we feel like we are going to lose our minds because of what we are going through.”

Ruwaida Amer is a journalist based in Gaza.

Nothing to Eat at Eid

Ruwaida Amer 

The Electronic Intifada 

18 June 2024

Since the first day of this horrible war, we have been waiting for its end.

We had hoped that it would end with the arrival of 2024. But then the new year came and Israel did not halt its genocide.

Ramadan arrived later.

We fast for long hours during Ramadan. It is a month in which we need peace and calm.

But the war did not stop then. Nor did it stop at Eid al-Fitr.

And now it is continuing during Eid al-Adha.

My father and brother would normally prepare for Eid al-Adha by going to see the sacrifice of animals with our neighbor Abu Alaa.

That is not possible this year. Abu Alaa has left Gaza so that he could take care of his daughter, who lost her husband and child in a huge explosion.

We fast during the 10 days leading to Eid al-Adha. Then Eid begins with its beautiful takbir – a preface to prayer.

My brother and father would normally collect the meat for the Eid feast. Then we would distribute meat among our extended family.

Various relatives would call and express appreciation for the meat – both the quality and the quantity.

It is completely different this Eid.

For more than a month, there has been no meat or fish available in the markets.

The only food available are some legumes and canned foods that our stomachs no longer tolerate.

We had hoped that Israel would allow food to enter Gaza ahead of Eid. But Israel did not do so.

All the evidence indicates that Israel has a deliberate policy of starving our people.

For the first time, I did not wake up to the sound of an Eid takbir from the mosque. It was as if the sound was so low that nobody could hear it.

I woke up and said some kind words to my family. But there was a great sadness and exhaustion in my heart.

We would normally coordinate our Eid preparations with my sister.

That is not possible this year. Her house and its contents have been destroyed by Israel.

You can see the sadness in my sister’s eyes; she cries every day. She cannot spend Eid in her home.

She has not been able to buy Eid clothes for her children. There are no clothes in the market.

Fortunately, they already had some good clothes that they could wear.

The sacrificing of animals cannot be arranged in the normal way. Prices of farm animals are astronomical.

A small skinny sheep costs approximately $1,000. It used to cost $400.

The quality of meat is low, too, as there is not enough feed for livestock.

We are all going through a famine because of Israel’s invasion of Rafah. It forced the closure of the crossing between that city and Egypt.

My father used to drive to my aunts’ houses and give them meat.

This Eid, my aunts are not in their homes. Each of them is in a tent.

The Israeli army destroyed their homes when it invaded the city of Khan Younis.

My father still went to check on my aunts this Eid. The trip took hours as he had no means of transport.

When he came back to us, he was so exhausted that he could barely stand. His clothes were in a poor condition from all the dust and rubble to which he was exposed.

My mother tried to call some relatives. But she could not get a connection.

She is accustomed to being visited by her nephews. None of them came this Eid.

The distance is too long and the journey too difficult. They are all in tents.

No joy

I am not well. I feel like I am going to collapse from exhaustion.

My head almost explodes when I contrast my life before and during the war.

At one point this Eid, there were just three of us at home. One of my sisters, my mother and myself.

“What do you want to eat?” my sister asked.

I told her that I hated this question. My stomach is tired of legumes and canned food but we have nothing else.

I used to go to the mall every day and bring home groceries for my family. I cannot do so now because there is almost nothing to buy.

There is no joy at Eid this year.

The sound of bombing has not stopped. We can also hear shells being fired from tanks.

And we can hear ambulances.

When I heard an ambulance, I wondered who had been martyred on the first day of Eid al-Adha.

The streets are quiet. There are no children playing in them.

The only visitor we had was my uncle who came to check on us. He asked if the war will end or if we will be killed.

This war has deprived us of everything.

We have lost our happiness and security.

We have been robbed of the right to food and water.

Children have lost their childhood.

Youth have lost their future.

This war has meant that we are going through what our parents went through during the Nakba, the 1948 ethnic cleansing of Palestine. Yet our experience is more difficult than that of our grandparents.

Israel is committing a genocide with weapons from the US, the world’s only superpower.

It is as if the language of peace no longer exists. It has been replaced by the language of death and war.

Ruwaida Amer is a journalist based in Gaza.

Massacres in Rafah, Nuseirat | Gallant to Visit Washington | US Pier Reconnected – Day 258

June 20, 2024

Israel continues to carry out massacres against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.(Photo: Mahmoud Ajjour, Palestine Chronicle)

By Palestine Chronicle Staff  

At least two women were killed and 12 Palestinians were wounded in an Israeli shelling that targeted a house in the Al-Hasayneh area, west of Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will visit the United States next week.

The US pier in Gaza was reconnected on Wednesday after being temporarily separated last Friday due to poor conditions at sea.

According to Gaza’s Ministry of Health, 37,396 Palestinians have been killed, and 85,523 wounded in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza starting on October 7.

Thursday, June 20, 10:00 am

PALESTINIAN MEDIA: At least 10 Palestinians were killed and dozens were injured by an Israeli airstrike targeting a group of civilians on Salah Eddin Street, east of Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip.

ISRAELI MEDIA: Israeli Channel 14 quoted the Minister of Religious Affairs as saying that they are preparing themselves in Israel for mass burial scenarios in preparation for a war in the north.

Thursday, June 20, 09:00 am

CHANNEL 12: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to establish a mini-ministerial security body with the participation of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.

AL-JAZEERA: Demonstrators closed the Ayalon axis in Tel Aviv and raised slogans demanding the conclusion of a prisoner exchange deal.

Thursday, June 20, 08:00 am

CHANNEL 12: Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will visit the United States next week.

Thursday, June 20, 07:00 am

FORMER US AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL: Congressional leaders should cancel their invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to deliver a speech.

ISRAELI CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS: Foreign direct investments in Israel decreased to $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2024, a decline of 55.8% compared to the last quarter of 2023.

Thursday, June 20, 05:10 am

REUTERS (Citing US officials): The US pier in Gaza was reconnected on Wednesday after being temporarily separated last Friday due to poor conditions at sea.

AL-JAZEERA: Two women were killed and 12 Palestinians were wounded in an Israeli shelling that targeted a house in the Al-Hasayneh area, west of Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip.

(The Palestine Chronicle)

Massacres in Rafah, Nuseirat | Gallant to Visit Washington | US Pier Reconnected – Day 258

June 20, 2024

Israel continues to carry out massacres against Palestinian civilians in Gaza.(Photo: Mahmoud Ajjour, Palestine Chronicle)

By Palestine Chronicle Staff  

At least two women were killed and 12 Palestinians were wounded in an Israeli shelling that targeted a house in the Al-Hasayneh area, west of Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip.

Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will visit the United States next week.

The US pier in Gaza was reconnected on Wednesday after being temporarily separated last Friday due to poor conditions at sea.

According to Gaza’s Ministry of Health, 37,396 Palestinians have been killed, and 85,523 wounded in Israel’s ongoing genocide in Gaza starting on October 7.

Thursday, June 20, 10:00 am

PALESTINIAN MEDIA: At least 10 Palestinians were killed and dozens were injured by an Israeli airstrike targeting a group of civilians on Salah Eddin Street, east of Rafah, in the southern Gaza Strip.

ISRAELI MEDIA: Israeli Channel 14 quoted the Minister of Religious Affairs as saying that they are preparing themselves in Israel for mass burial scenarios in preparation for a war in the north.

Thursday, June 20, 09:00 am

CHANNEL 12: Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to establish a mini-ministerial security body with the participation of National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir.

AL-JAZEERA: Demonstrators closed the Ayalon axis in Tel Aviv and raised slogans demanding the conclusion of a prisoner exchange deal.

Thursday, June 20, 08:00 am

CHANNEL 12: Israeli Defense Minister Yoav Gallant will visit the United States next week.

Thursday, June 20, 07:00 am

FORMER US AMBASSADOR TO ISRAEL: Congressional leaders should cancel their invitation to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to deliver a speech.

ISRAELI CENTRAL BUREAU OF STATISTICS: Foreign direct investments in Israel decreased to $1.1 billion in the first quarter of 2024, a decline of 55.8% compared to the last quarter of 2023.

Thursday, June 20, 05:10 am

REUTERS (Citing US officials): The US pier in Gaza was reconnected on Wednesday after being temporarily separated last Friday due to poor conditions at sea.

AL-JAZEERA: Two women were killed and 12 Palestinians were wounded in an Israeli shelling that targeted a house in the Al-Hasayneh area, west of Nuseirat in the central Gaza Strip.

(The Palestine Chronicle)

‘Dust in the Eyes’ – What Did Hagari Mean by ‘Destroying Hamas is Not Possible’?

June 19, 2024

Israeli army spokesperson Daniel Hagari. (Photo: via Al-Jazeera Arabic)

By Palestine Chronicle Editors

The Israeli army has always been frustrated with Netanyahu, even before the start of the war. But since October 7, the rift between the military and political establishments has reached new heights. 

“Whoever thinks it is possible to destroy Hamas is mistaken,” Israeli army spokesman Daniel Hagari said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 13 on Wednesday.

“Saying that it is possible to destroy Hamas and to make it disappear is to throw dust into the public’s eyes,” Hagari added.

The latest statement is a complete departure from every single announcement that Hagari himself had made about Israel’s war objectives in Gaza. In his daily press statements, Hagari has described what seemed the systematic destruction of Hamas’ military capabilities throughout the Gaza Strip. 

Hagari’s recent words also contradict the latest assertion by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu where he, once more, insisted on a “total victory” in Gaza.

The contradictions can easily be attributed to the growing conflict between the Israeli army and the political establishment of Netanyahu and his far-right ministers in Tel Aviv. 

Indeed, in an unprecedented episode, the Israeli army has declared a “tactical pause” in southern Gaza without consulting with its political leadership, a decision that raised the ire of Netanyahu and his allies. 

“We have a country with an army, not an army with a country,” he said during a cabinet meeting on June 16.

The Israeli army has always been frustrated with Netanyahu, even before the start of the war. But since October 7, the rift between the military and political establishments has reached new heights. 

Still, much of that tension was frequently contained due to the fact that the Israeli wars – in Gaza and Lebanon – were largely managed by a war council, which involved opposition leaders and individuals with high credibility within the military institution. 

The anticipated resignation of Israeli opposition leader, Benny Gantz – who was the Chief of Staff of the Israeli army in 2014 – Gadi Eisenkot and others, and the subsequent dismantling of the war council changed the political dynamics that governed Israel throughout the last nine months. 

The army now feels emboldened and is openly voicing its frustration due to the lack of a post-war political plan. 

It must also be stated that while, indeed, the Israeli army has served a central role in the very foundation of Israel, a conflict of this nature is unprecedented. 

Historically, Israeli generals are incorporated into the political establishment once they retire, or they tend to serve as consultants in major Israeli military manufacturing firms. 

Netanyahu’s new political formation, however, has deliberately sidelined the military establishment altogether. 

The Israeli military leadership must have realized that the post-war scenario in Israel must include the recentering of its political role as part of the political establishment. To do so, far-right characters such as ministers Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich, both with no military experience, cannot be part of the political formation of the ‘day after’ scenario.

This should explain the context of the current rivalry underway in Israel, the consequences of which are surely to be far-reaching.

(The Palestine Chronicle)

Ignore Race and Religion – It’s Political, Not Ethnic

June 19, 2024

Zionism is a racist, colonial ideology. (Image: Palestine Chronicle)

By Blake Alcott

Colonized have been fighting colonizers for millennia. Not because the colonizers were Christian Crusaders or Moslem Tatars, or Buddhists, or French, Belgian, British or German, but rather because of what colonizing is: collective slavery.

When a Palestinian resistance fighter shoots an Israeli soldier, who is he actually shooting? By all evidence, he is not shooting a Jew because he or she is a Jew, but because he or she is a colonial occupier.

The Palestinian resistance has always – yes: ever since the years of the British Mandate – said it is fighting colonial occupiers whose race and religion don’t matter. I believe them, the more so as there is no history of anti-Jewishness in the Arab world.

The PLO cannot have had anything against Jews as Jews – that is, because they were Jews – seeing as Article 6 of its Charter included indigenous Jews in its definition of ‘Palestinians’.

Towards the middle of the British occupation, the Palestinian leadership increasingly said they would accept as Palestinians those Jewish immigrants who had become Palestinian citizens under Mandate law – despite the fact that they’d come to Palestine in order to take it over. Again and again they stressed that it was Zionist immigration they were against, not necessarily Jewish immigration.

So by the correct definition of ‘antisemitism,’ the Palestinians have never been antisemites. But more: neither Jews as Jews, nor Zionism, have anything to do with the core of Palestinians’ liberation problem, which is simply that they are colonized, by whomsoever.

My choice for Article of the Year 2023 appeared in Mondoweiss on 26 September, written by Mohammed El-Kurd with the title: “Jewish settlers stole my house. It’s not my fault they’re Jewish.”

It’s Political, Not Ethnic

Colonized have been fighting colonizers for millennia. Not because the colonizers were Christian Crusaders or Moslem Tatars, or Buddhists, or French, Belgian, British or German, but rather because of what colonizing is: collective slavery.

The ethnicity (or ‘race’ – in this article they are synonymous) and religion of the colonial occupier of Palestine is thus incidental in the Palestinians’ freedom fight. From 1918 until 1948 the colonial power was Christian Britain. It could have been anybody. Now the occupiers insist on calling their colonial state ‘Jewish’. But as Mohammed El-Kurd wrote, that’s their business.

Zionists are a mixture of Israelis, Western politicians, and the apologists for racist-colonialism in the Western press, from the Washington Post all the way down to Zürich’s Tages-Anzeiger. It is these Zionists who unrelentingly commit the intellectual crime of conflating Israel’s nature as colonizer and its self-bestowed nature as Jewish. They assault our brains daily with the literally untrue equation of Zionism and Jewishness, always underlying the ethnicity or religion of the Israeli majority rather than its role as oppressor since 1948.

If they instead wrote that up to 1200 occupying settlers and soldiers had been killed on October 7, 2023, the current battle would finally be accurately described: it’s political. For the Israelis, to be sure, it is also racial and religious, but not for the Palestinians. As Hamas wrote in its Document of General Principles & Policies in 2017.

Hamas does not wage a struggle against the Jews because they are Jewish but wages a struggle against the Zionists who occupy Palestine. Yet, it is the Zionists who constantly identify Judaism and the Jews with their own colonial project and illegal entity.

The lesson for those of us in Palestine solidarity is that we should never speak or write of the ‘Jewish state’, only of ‘Israel’ or the ‘colonial state’ or maybe the ‘Zionist entity’ or, following common Arabic-language usage, simply ‘the occupation’.

A Little History

When freed from Ottoman rule the Palestinians – the people in the southern part of al-Sham – were thirsting for simple independence. In the terms of Article 22 of the Covenant of the League of Nations, they wanted to “stand on their own”.

Nobody denies that the role of colonizer passed from the Ottomans to the British just after World War I. The British ran Palestine for thirty years out of their Colonial Office in London. Rule was shaped and enforced by bureaucrats and soldiers from a big island northwest of France, not by indigenous Palestinians. The more so as the League of Nations exercised no control over its ‘mandated’ territories, whoever wants to deny that ‘Mandate’ was a mere euphemism for ‘colony’ should step forward.

But as of 1948, when it comes to Israel, confusion takes over. It and its apologists burn the midnight oil trying to show that Israel is not a (settler-)colony, although the facts make their job very tough.

A few facts: The Jewish Colonization Association was founded already in 1891 to help settle European Jews in Palestine. The Jewish Colonial Trust was a bank formed in London in 1899 for similar purposes. The Articles describing Britain’s task as ‘Mandatory’ literally included the 1917 Balfour Declaration’s pledge to establish (alas, in Palestine) a “national home for the Jewish people” and furthermore specified as the main colonization tool a “Jewish agency” which would “facilitate Jewish immigration” “encourage the close settlement of Jews on the land” and “facilitate the acquisition of Palestinian citizenship by Jews”.

That is, the mechanics of British and Jewish-Zionist colonization were never separate. Governor of Jerusalem Ronald Storrs called the British entity in Palestine the “Zionist Mandate” – a Zionist colony. The European immigrants routinely described their new settlements as ‘colonies’. And their use of the word ‘return’ to describe their movement from Europe into Palestine was an acknowledgment that in the real-life twentieth century, they were coming from somewhere else.

In 1921, Palestinian anti-Zionist Mohamed Osman flabbergastedly wrote to Colonial Secretary Churchill that “we have never heard of a country being given wholesale to a people who have never seen it or whose fathers never lived in it.” In 1930 Awni Abdul Hadi rhetorically asked a League of Nations commission, “How can these British politicians make promises in a land they don’t own to a group of foreigners in a country that is not theirs either?” He repeated this sentiment to David Gruen’s face in 1934. These were the first indigenous conceptualizations of settler-colonialism.

Repeated ‘Legislative Councils’ floated by Britain foresaw a majority of seats for supporters of the colonization project. The Cabinet Committee on Palestine in 1939, fed up with the ruinous cost of the Great Revolt as well as the Mandate in general, discussed “handing over a whole colony to the Jews” for their state – e.g. British Guiana or Honduras. And George Antonius in 1940 wrote that the ‘Jewish national home’, hitherto non-existent, could logically only denote a colony.

Except for a handful, the actual Zionists who were forced upon Palestine before 1948 came from Europe or the Americas, and by 1948 they were over 500,000 strong and together with the Arab Jews made up 32% of Palestine’s population.

The Declaration of the Establishment (not ‘Independence’) of Israel was signed by 37 people. One was born in Palestine, one in Yemen, and 35 in Eastern Europe. If this is not the establishment of a European colony, what is?

Usurpation of Political Land

The rest of the colonies established just after the First World War – Lebanon, Syria, Iraq, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Egypt – got their independence. Only Palestine remained and remains colonized. Britain had done its job in passing the baton on to Israel, the state it had enabled.

Today’s Israelis thus in fact exercise colonial power, and therefore we have a perfectly adequate non-racial, non-religious vocabulary with which to describe the colonized’s battle. When for instance we talk of the attack on the Zionist state on October 7, referring to that state’s self-defined Jewishness can take the back seat.

In terms of actual land area taken into military control, by the end of 1948 about 78% of Palestine had been robbed and squatted on by settlers. UN General Assembly Resolution 181 had recommended the new ethno-state’s colonization of 56% of Palestine, but guns and violence secured roughly another 22%. (And since Jordan and Egypt took the rest, all of Palestine had then been politically usurped – colonized.)

We know the details of the ethnic cleansing on the basis of non-Jewishness. The result was that today at least two-thirds of Palestinians are displaced. They live under appalling injustice, both historical and current. Like all violated people they do and will fight back, whatever the race or religion of the wrong-doers. Similarly, in Hollywood movies the landowner stands on his porch with his shotgun, telling the trespassers ‘Get off my land!’ without asking after the race or religion of the trespassers.

This is not to deny that many Palestinians are motivated not only by their vision of liberation but also by their religion, whether Christianity or Islam. The Al-Aqsa Flood is aptly named. But the topic of Islamism in the freedom fight goes way beyond the scope of this article.

Race and Religion are Weapons

Racism and religious bias are extremely frowned upon in the pages of public opinion, and of course, Jews as Jews were horribly destroyed in Europe pre-1948. So the anti-Palestinians can only profit if public opinion sees the freedom fight in racial and religious terms.

Britain laid the groundwork for ‘religionizing’ Palestine. In the Balfour Declaration it set up two groups – “Jews” and “non-Jews” – and later invented a ‘Supreme Moslem Council’. It furthermore reserved Legislative Council seats for Christians, Jews and Moslems separately.

It is seldom remarked that it is only the Israeli side that defines its groupness in ethno-religious terms. The Palestinians have always included all of the three above-named religions in their group, defining themselves only in terms of place, language and culture. Even the Islamic Resistance Movement Hamas primarily defines itself, not Palestine, as Islamic, and has never denied that Druze, Christians and Jews are ‘Palestinians’.

Thus, any talk of two ‘sides’, and especially of two ‘peoples’, is false. At best it is comparing apples and pears, while at worst it unfairly ethnicizes the Palestinian polity.

But mainly, without this ethno-religious framing the antisemitism weapon falls from the Zionists’ hands. This weapon is now powerful even if, due to its inherent nonsensicality, its days are numbered. It has convinced hundreds of millions of voters in the pro-Zionist Western countries.

The ongoing genocide, to be sure, is a matter of race and religion, but only because the perpetrators want it that way. It is they who brutally discriminate in terms of ethnicity.

We need to start right now boycotting the premise that the struggle is between two religions or ‘peoples’, and use only its accurate description as an anti-colonial fight. You fight to get your physical and political land back, whoever took it. You resist Israelis who are Jews, but not because they are Jews. There is no need to especially ponder the Jewishness of colonial power Israel.

Fourteen million Palestinians will get their homeland back. That will be easier if the Palestinian cause can be politically explained to people in countries full of Zionist apologists – people who could remove their current leaders. I think that we can do this job more effectively if we realize that this is not about Jews. Jewish Israelis come into the picture only because as a matter of historical accident they are the occupiers. It’s not even about Zionism. It’s about Palestinians.

– Blake Alcott is a retired cabinetmaker and ecological economist who has been a solidarity activist since 2010, now living in Zürich. He is Director of ODS in Palestine (UK), an NGO working to make One Democratic State more understandable to the public. His 2023 book, The Rape of Palestine: A Mandate Chronology, consists of 490 instances of the dialogue, such as it was, between the British and the Palestinians during the years 1917-1948. He contributed this article to The Palestine Chronicle

Unconditional Support – The United States Is the Main Obstacle to Peace in Palestine

June 17, 2024

Protests continue in the US calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. (Image: Palestine Chronicle)

By Medea Benjamin & Nicolas J.S. Davies

The United States seems determined to share Israel’s self-inflicted isolation from voices calling for peace from all over the world.

On June 13, Hamas responded to persistent needling by US Secretary of State Antony Blinken over the US proposal for a pause in the Israeli massacre in Gaza. The group said it has “dealt positively… with the latest proposal and all proposals to reach a ceasefire agreement.” Hamas added, by contrast, that, “while Blinken continues to talk about ‘Israel’s approval of the latest proposal, we have not heard any Israeli official voicing approval.”

The full details of the US proposal have yet to be made public, but the pause in Israeli attacks and release of hostages in the first phase would reportedly lead to further negotiations for a more lasting ceasefire and the Israeli withdrawal from Gaza in the second phase. But there is no guarantee that the second round of negotiations would succeed.

As former Israeli Labor Party prime minister Ehud Barak told Israel Radio on June 3, “How do you think (Gaza military commander) Sinwar will react when he is told: but be quick, because we still have to kill you, after you return all the hostages?”

Meanwhile, as Hamas pointed out, Israel has not publicly accepted the terms of the latest US ceasefire proposal, so it has only the word of US officials that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has privately agreed to it. In public, Netanyahu still insists that he is committed to the complete destruction of Hamas and its governing authority in Gaza, and has actually stepped up Israel’s vicious attacks in central and southern Gaza.

The basic disagreement that President Joe Biden and Secretary Blinken’s smoke and mirrors cannot hide is that Hamas, like every Palestinian, wants a real end to the genocide, while the Israeli and US governments do not.

Biden or Netanyahu could end the slaughter very quickly if they wanted to—Netanyahu by agreeing to a permanent ceasefire, or Biden by ending or suspending US weapons deliveries to Israel.

Israel could not carry out this war without US military and diplomatic support. But Biden refuses to use his leverage, even though he has admitted in an interview that it was “reasonable” to conclude that Netanyahu is prolonging the war for his own political benefit.

The US is still sending weapons to Israel to continue the massacre in violation of a ceasefire order by the International Court of Justice. Bipartisan US leaders have invited Netanyahu to address a joint session of the US Congress on July 24, even as the International Criminal Court reviews a request by its chief prosecutor for an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for war crimes, crimes against humanity and murder.

The United States seems determined to share Israel’s self-inflicted isolation from voices calling for peace from all over the world, including large majorities of countries in the UN General Assembly and Security Council.

But perhaps this is appropriate, as the United States bears a great deal of responsibility for that isolation. By its decades of unconditional support for Israel, and by using its UN Security Council veto dozens of times to shield Israel from international accountability, the United States has enabled successive Israeli governments to pursue flagrantly criminal policies and to thumb their noses at the growing outrage of people and countries across the world.

This pattern of US support for Israel goes all the way back to its founding, when Zionist leaders in Palestine unleashed a well-planned operation to seize much more territory than the UN allocated to their new state in its partition plan, which the Palestinians and neighboring countries already firmly opposed.

The massacres, the bulldozed villages and the ethnic cleansing of 750,000 to a million people in the Nakba have been meticulously documented, despite an extraordinary propaganda campaign to persuade two generations of Israelis, Americans and Europeans that they never happened.

The US was the first country to grant Israel de facto recognition on May 14, 1948, and played a leading role in the 1949 UN votes to recognize the new state of Israel within its illegally seized borders. President Eisenhower had the wisdom to oppose Britain, France and Israel in their war to capture the Suez Canal in 1956, but Israel’s seizure of the Occupied Palestinian Territories in 1967 persuaded U.S. leaders that it could be a valuable military ally in the Middle East.

Unconditional US support for Israel’s illegal occupation and annexation of more and more territory over the past 57 years has corrupted Israeli politics and encouraged increasingly extreme and racist Israeli governments to keep expanding their genocidal territorial ambitions. Netanyahu’s Likud party and government now fully embrace their Greater Israel plan to annex all of occupied Palestine and parts of other countries, wherever and whenever new opportunities for expansion present themselves.

Israel’s de facto expansion has been facilitated by the United States monopoly over mediation between Israel and Palestine, which it has aggressively staked out and defended against the UN and other countries. The irreconcilable contradiction between the US’ conflicting roles as Israel’s most powerful military ally and the principal mediator between Israel and Palestine is obvious to the whole world.

But as we see even in the midst of the genocide in Gaza, the rest of the world and the UN have failed to break this US monopoly and establish legitimate, impartial mediation by the UN or neutral countries that respect the lives of Palestinians and their human and civil rights.

Qatar mediated a temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in November 2023, but it has since been upstaged by US moves to prolong the massacre through deceptive proposals, cynical posturing and Security Council vetoes. The US consistently vetoes all but its own proposals on Israel and Palestine in the UN Security Council, even when its own proposals are deliberately meaningless, ineffective or counterproductive.

The UN General Assembly is united in support of Palestine, voting almost unanimously year after year to demand an end to the Israeli occupation. 

A hundred and forty-four countries have recognized Palestine as a country, and only the US veto denies it full UN membership. The Israeli genocide in Gaza has even shamed the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and the International Criminal Court (ICC) into suspending their ingrained pro-Western bias and pursuing cases against Israel.

One way that the nations of the world could come together to apply greater pressure on Israel to end its assault on Gaza would be a “Uniting for Peace” resolution in the UN General Assembly. This is a measure the General Assembly can take when the Security Council is prevented from acting to restore peace and security by the veto of a permanent member.

Israel has demonstrated that it is prepared to ignore ceasefire resolutions by the General Assembly and the Security Council, and an order by the ICJ, but a Uniting for Peace resolution could impose penalties on Israel for its actions, such as an arms embargo or an economic boycott. If the United States still insists on continuing its complicity in Israel’s international crimes, the General Assembly could take action against the US too.

A General Assembly resolution would change the terms of the international debate and shift the focus back from Biden and Blinken’s diversionary tactics to the urgency of enforcing the lasting ceasefire that the whole world is calling for.

It is time for the United Nations and neutral countries to push Israel’s US partner in genocide to the side, and for legitimate international authorities and mediators to take responsibility for enforcing international law, ending the Israeli occupation of Palestine and bringing peace to the Middle East.

– Medea Benjamin and Nicolas J. S. Davies are the authors of War in Ukraine: Making Sense of a Senseless Conflict, published by OR Books in November 2022.

– Medea Benjamin is the cofounder of CODEPINK for Peace, and the author of several books, including Inside Iran: The Real History and Politics of the Islamic Republic of Iran. 

– Nicolas J. S. Davies is an independent journalist, a researcher for CODEPINK and the author of Blood on Our Hands: The American Invasion and Destruction of Iraq.