Tuesday, June 23, 2026

Kenyan Health Minister Halts Controversial US-backed Ebola Site

By Africa News

Kenya has ordered a halt to preparations for a US-run Ebola quarantine facility, the health minister told a court Tuesday after being held in contempt for ignoring a previous stop-work order.

"I have directed the immediate and complete cessation of any intended construction, site preparation, or related activities concerning the Laikipia Air Base facility pending the hearing and determination of the substantive petition or until further orders of this court," health minister Aden Duale said.

The facility at Laikipia Air Base, about 200 kilometres from Nairobi, was intended to treat or quarantine US citizens evacuated from DR Congo, the epicenter of an ongoing Ebola outbreak. Kenyans have strongly opposed the plan and there have been deadly protests since it was announced last month.

Duale apologised to the court and said he had understood the court order to apply only to Kenya's collaboration with the US, not to the construction of the facility.

"I was driven by a zealous attempt to ensure that public health is always assured," Duale said.

The court accepted Duale's apology and spared him a possible jail sentence. But it issued a warning against any future non-compliance.

Washington has pledged $13.5 million to support Kenya's Ebola preparedness efforts, but critics oppose what they see as colonial overtones in the arrangement.

UK Placed UAE Ties Over Preventing Atrocities in El-Fasher: Testimony

By Al Mayadeen English

23 Jun 2026 19:22

A war crimes investigator told UK MPs that Britain failed to act on warnings of mass killings in Sudan’s El Fasher due to UAE diplomatic concerns.

The British government has been accused of deliberately suppressing intelligence and obstructing international action during the genocidal assault on El-Fasher in Sudan, where an estimated 60,000 civilians were killed, according to testimony presented to a parliamentary committee.

The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) reportedly received repeated alerts describing the situation as potentially one of the largest mass casualty events of the 21st century. These warnings came ahead of the UAE-backed RSF’s assault on El-Fasher after the extended siege.

Nathaniel Raymond, executive director of the Humanitarian Research Lab (HRL) at the Yale School of Public Health, told the International Development Committee that his team provided UK officials with real-time intelligence for more than two years. He said the data consistently indicated that the siege would result in large-scale civilian killings.

Raymond said officials were informed that the situation was escalating toward mass atrocities, yet policy action did not follow at a level he described as necessary to prevent the outcome.

Economic ties prioritized over genocide prevention

Raymond told MPs that UK officials prioritized diplomatic and economic relations with the United Arab Emirates over preventing mass civilian deaths in El-Fasher. He said concerns over the UAE’s role in the conflict influenced how the UK responded to the intelligence provided.

He stated that officials “prioritised HMG’s [His Majesty’s Government’s] economic, security, and diplomatic relationships with the UAE above preventing the intentional starvation, forced displacement, and the genocidal slaughter of tens of thousands of civilians living in El Fasher and its surrounding communities,” in written testimony to MPs.

The HRL had used satellite imagery and open-source intelligence to track developments in El-Fasher. He said UK officials were given a detailed analysis showing the likely trajectory of the siege and its humanitarian consequences.

The UK, as the UN Security Council penholder on Sudan, had access to sufficient intelligence to develop policy responses that could have altered the outcome, including potential sanctions and diplomatic pressure, he said.

El-Fasher drowns in civilian blood

The RSF captured El-Fasher in October after an 18-month siege. UN investigators later said the operation bore the hallmarks of genocide.

Raymond told MPs that at least 60,000 people may have been killed in the weeks following the city’s fall, based on satellite imagery and open-source intelligence. He compared the scale of destruction to some of the most lethal modern mass casualty events.

The UK, he stated, had policy options available during the escalation, including sanctions targeting individuals linked to external support networks for the RSF, arguing that stronger diplomatic pressure could have disrupted weapons flows and altered the course of events.

He told MPs that UK officials acknowledged internal constraints linked to political sensitivities, including the potential reaction from the UAE.

Foreign Office censorship

Raymond also described meetings in which Foreign Office officials discussed limits on public warnings from civil society groups. NGOs were reportedly cautioned against repeatedly issuing alerts about the fall of El-Fasher, to avoid diminishing credibility.

He said the FCDO interpreted its obligations under a UN Security Council resolution narrowly, limiting additional action against the RSF’s external backers.

RSF operations briefly paused following the adoption of a UN Security Council resolution demanding an end to the siege in 2024. He said sources indicated that RSF leadership considered whether international consequences would follow.

However, once it became clear that no meaningful consequences were expected, Raymond said operations resumed.

Limits of intelligence without political action

Raymond concluded that while advanced intelligence and satellite analysis can provide early warning, they do not substitute for political will. He told MPs that the El-Fasher case demonstrates how timely intelligence alone is insufficient without decisive governmental action.

The period covered by his testimony spans the final months of the Sunak government and the early months of the Starmer administration. The relevant foreign secretaries during this period included Lord David Cameron, David Lammy, and Yvette Cooper.

Egypt Claim Historic First World Cup Win Against New Zealand

By Al Mayadeen English

22 Jun 2026 07:59

Egypt secured their first-ever World Cup victory with a 3-1 comeback win over New Zealand, as Mohamed Salah starred in a second-half turnaround that sent the Pharaohs to the top of Group G.

Egypt secured their first-ever FIFA World Cup victory after overturning a first-half deficit to defeat New Zealand 3-1 in a dramatic Group G encounter, moving to the top of the standings and boosting their chances of reaching the knockout stages.

After being frustrated for much of the opening half and trailing at the break, the Pharaohs responded with a dominant second-half display led by captain Mohamed Salah, who scored once and provided an assist as Egypt made history.

“It’s a great achievement for all the players. It’s a great win. It’s a great vibe. The next game is very important,” Salah said after the final whistle.

The victory leaves Egypt atop Group G with four points from two matches after opening their campaign with a 1-1 draw against Belgium. New Zealand, who drew 2-2 with Iran in their first match, remain bottom of the group with one point.

Salah inspires second-half turnaround

New Zealand entered the match with a disciplined approach and was rewarded midway through the first half.

Defender Finn Surman broke the deadlock in the 15th minute, rising above his marker to power a header past the Egyptian goalkeeper from Tim Payne's corner.

The goal stunned the heavily pro-Egyptian crowd at BC Place and handed the All Whites a deserved advantage after a composed opening period.

However, Egypt emerged after halftime with greater urgency and attacking intent.

Their pressure paid off in the 58th minute when Mostafa Ziko headed home a precise cross from Mohamed Hany to restore parity and ignite the Egyptian supporters.

Just nine minutes later, Salah delivered the moment fans had been waiting for.

The Liverpool star surged down the right flank, exchanged passes with Ziko, and calmly slotted the ball into the far corner to complete Egypt's comeback.

Pharaohs move top of Group G

Egypt continued to dominate as New Zealand struggled to regain control of the contest.

Salah nearly added a second goal in the 81st minute after cutting inside from the right, but his deflected effort flew over the crossbar.

From the resulting corner, however, he turned provider.

Substitute Trézéguet met the delivery with a diving header at the near post to seal Egypt's third goal and put the result beyond doubt.

The New Zealand side continued to fight until the closing stages, while Egypt were forced into a late change after defender Hossam Abdelmaguid suffered a suspected concussion following a collision.

Knockout hopes strengthened after landmark win

As the match entered stoppage time, Egyptian supporters inside the stadium sensed the significance of the occasion.

When the referee blew the final whistle, celebrations erupted among players and fans alike as Egypt secured the country's first World Cup victory.

Head coach Hossam Hassan joined the celebrations by carrying an Egyptian flag around the stadium, while players embraced on the pitch after a result that could prove decisive in the battle for qualification.

With one group match remaining against Iran set to take place on June 27, Egypt now controls its own destiny and has taken a major step toward a place in the knockout rounds.

Resistance is Lebanon's Sole Guarantee Against Occupation: Sheikh Naim

By Al Mayadeen English

23 Jun 2026 20:16

Sheikh Naim Qassem says resistance remains Lebanon's only guarantee against occupation, calls for a full Israeli withdrawal, and urges authorities to draw on Hezbollah's strength.

Hezbollah Secretary-General Sheikh Naim Qassem reaffirmed the Resistance's commitment to the Taif Agreement and the Lebanese Constitution, asserting Hezbollah's experience as one of the country's foremost models of national engagement and coexistence.

Addressing critics who claim the mantle of patriotism, Sheikh Qassem said that some political forces in Lebanon had historically resorted to massacres and violence in attempts to eliminate their rivals, but argued that dialogue remains possible among Lebanese factions, warning that "Israel" neither respects nor spares anyone.

Sheikh Naim underscored that developments on the battlefield were the decisive factor in shaping the current reality. Without the Resistance's presence in the field and the sacrifices of its "legendary and martyrdom-seeking youth," he said, the outcome would have been fundamentally different.

He further credited the resilience of martyrs, the wounded, prisoners, and the families that rallied around the Resistance with thwarting a broader project aimed at dismantling Hezbollah. "Our right is not up for negotiation," he declared, stressing that defending Lebanese territory remains a non-negotiable principle whose costs the Resistance has consciously accepted.

According to Sheikh Qassem, resistance remains the only credible guarantee for liberating occupied land, insisting that "Israel" has failed to achieve its objectives on the battlefield and will remain incapable of doing so regardless of the passage of time.

He argued that had the battlefield collapsed, "Israel" would have advanced its project of eliminating Hezbollah and realizing the "Greater Israel" project.

US abandoned 2024 ceasefire, Israeli aggression failed

Addressing the ceasefire arrangements, Sheikh Qassem said Washington had initially presented itself as a guarantor of the November 27 agreement but subsequently disavowed that role. He explained that patience had constituted an integral part of the battlefield strategy before the Resistance transitioned to direct combat once it judged that the timing and circumstances were appropriate.

Sheikh Qassem said the battlefield trajectory ultimately yielded the current ceasefire, which, in his view, must be followed by a complete Israeli withdrawal from Lebanese territory.

He expressed gratitude to Iran, describing it as "among the most honorable of nations in the world," and maintained that the Israeli aggression had failed to realize its goals despite the heavy sacrifices borne by the Resistance and the Lebanese people.

Resistance is always ready

Reiterating Hezbollah's conditions for a lasting resolution, the Hezbollah leader insisted that "Israel's" withdrawal from Lebanon must occur according to a clear timetable and that no portion of Lebanese territory could remain under occupation "under any pretext whatsoever."

He also called for an end to Israeli attacks by land, sea, and air, alongside the deployment of the Lebanese Army, the return of detainees, the return of displaced residents to their villages, and the launch of reconstruction efforts.

Within the framework of "mutual security," Sheikh Naim said Hezbollah would continue cooperating with the Lebanese Army to the fullest extent, stressing that "Israel" has no role in determining Lebanon's internal arrangements and must be prevented from interfering in domestic affairs.

Addressing the Lebanese authorities directly, he concluded: "Benefit from the Resistance and its strength. We are ready."

Palestine Decries Vandalization of Ibrahimi Mosque by Israel

Tuesday, 23 June 2026 7:20 PM

The photo shows Ibrahimi Mosque in the occupied West Bank city of West Bank.

The Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs has strongly condemned the latest Israeli actions in the courtyard of the Ibrahimi Mosque in the occupied West Bank city of al-Khalil.

These measures constitute a blatant attack on the holy site and form part of a deliberate effort to alter its Islamic and historical character.

In a statement issued on Tuesday, the ministry reported that Israeli occupation forces have begun removing the canopy in the mosque courtyard.

It described the move as a “new Judaization crime” and warned that it is part of a broader settlement project aimed at imposing a “new Judaization reality” inside the sacred site.

The ministry further stated that Israel’s claim of roofing the courtyard is merely a pretext for a policy designed to impose complete Zionist control over the Ibrahimi Mosque and eventually convert it into a Jewish synagogue.

It emphasized that these actions represent a direct assault on the mosque and an attempt to erase its Islamic, historical, and cultural identity.

The ministry stressed that the Ibrahimi Mosque is a purely Islamic endowment in its entirety, including its courtyards, arcades, and walls, and that the Zionist entity has no right whatsoever to interfere in its affairs or alter any part of its urban and historical structure.

These violations, it said, breach international laws and agreements that protect places of worship and religious sites.

The ministry called on the international community, UNESCO, and human rights organizations to take urgent action to stop the illegal Israeli measures.

It also urged Palestinians to increase their presence at the Ibrahimi Mosque to protect and defend it and to thwart the occupation’s plans to erase its Islamic identity.

The mosque lies in the Old City of al-Khalil, which remains under full Israeli control. There, approximately 400 Israeli settlers live under the protection of around 1,500 Israeli soldiers.

Settlers raze more land in West Bank as Israel intensifies Judaization drive in Palestinian territories

Israeli settlers raze a historic neighborhood near Ibrahimi Mosque in the occupied West Bank city of al-Khalil.

In 1994, following the massacre carried out by an Israeli settler that killed 29 Palestinian worshippers, Israel divided the mosque, allocating 63% to Jewish worshippers and 37% to Muslims.

Until recently, the al-Khalil municipality, the Palestinian Ministry of Awqaf and Religious Affairs, and the al-Khalil Rehabilitation Committee managed the technical and service aspects of the mosque under a 1997 agreement.

In January, Israel transferred construction licensing powers in al-Khalil from the Palestinian municipality to the so-called Israeli Civil Administration, a clear step in the Zionist regime’s ongoing campaign to Judaize the city.

Former PM Admits Israel Smuggled Starlinks to Iran During January Riots

Tuesday, 23 June 2026 6:28 PM

Former Israeli Prime Minister, Naftali Bennett. (File photo)

Former Israeli prime minister Naftali Bennett has admitted that Israel secretly smuggled Starlink satellite internet receivers into Iran to help organize riot groups and undermine the Islamic government.

Speaking at the JNS International Policy Conference in occupied al-Quds on Tuesday, Bennett revealed that the Israeli regime had initiated a plan to supply and smuggle tens of thousands of Starlink receivers into Iran.

Although Starlink, owned by Elon Musk’s SpaceX, has no official license to operate in Iran, Musk has previously confirmed that the service is active in the country.

Bennett said the devices were intended to allow “rioters to coordinate with each other and ultimately bring down the Iranian government.”

He added: “Unfortunately, the current ineffective Israeli cabinet stopped this plan, and when the riots took place, that infrastructure was not in place.”

The Starlink network was activated in Iran during the period between the 12-day US-Israeli aggression in June 2025 and the subsequent US-Israeli aggression in January 2026.

In February, the Wall Street Journal reported that the US government had secretly transferred thousands of Starlink terminals into Iran.

Later, Reuters reported that during the second US-Israeli aggression against Iran, US armed forces used Starlink internet infrastructure to direct drones in attacks on Iranian territory, resulting in the killing of civilians.

Iran has previously pointed to the role of Israel and the US in smuggling such equipment into the country with the aim of weakening its internal security.

Bennett, who leads a right-wing party and is among opposition figures challenging Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu in upcoming elections, said he would continue efforts to weaken the Iranian government if he returns to power.

He stated that such measures could include non-military actions such as economic and industrial sabotage, with the explicit goal of overthrowing the Iranian government.

What I witnessed in Tehran was rioters torching banks, smashing ATMs, burning buses, blocking roads, and filming destruction – which was ultimately rejected by the people through a massive national rally.

The January unrest in Iran began as peaceful protests by shopkeepers in commercial districts over the depreciation of the Iranian rial against the US dollar.

The protests were later escalated into violent disturbances by militant groups linked to Israel and the United States.

Armed individuals involved in the unrest killed civilians and security personnel and damaged public and private property. In response, the government deployed security forces to restore order and arrest the ringleaders.

Attacks on Lebanon 'Red Line'; Iran to Respond to Israeli Violations: Senior Diplomat

Tuesday, 23 June 2026 11:57 PM

Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations headquarters in Geneva, Ali Bahreini

A senior Iranian diplomat describes Lebanon as an unquestionable part of the recently signed memorandum of understanding between the Islamic Republic and the US, warning that Tehran will respond to Israeli violations against the Lebanese territory.

Iran’s Ambassador to the United Nations headquarters in Geneva, Ali Bahreini made the remarks on Tuesday.

The diplomat underlined that aggression targeting Lebanon, including the country's southern areas and the capital Beirut, constitute a "red line" for Iran, adding that the Israeli regime's potential contraventions would warrant Iranian response.

Iran and the United States signed the memorandum earlier this month. The understanding seeks to end the cycle arising out of the latest round of unprovoked American-Israeli aggression, which targeted the Islamic Republic between February 28 and April 7.

As part of the MoU, Iran has insisted on cessation of aggression on all fronts, including Lebanon.

Bahreini noted that initiation of negotiations between Tehran and Washington on a potential official agreement is contingent upon complete implementation of several clauses of the understanding, including cessation of the aggression.

Tehran has insisted that the launch of the negotiations should also be preceded by realization of such imperatives as recognition and continuation of the Islamic Republic's sovereignty over the Strait of Hormuz, removal of illegal sanctions, and unfreezing of Iranian assets.

Bahreini, meanwhile, noted that contrary to US claims, no discussions have taken place regarding permission for International Atomic Energy Agency inspectors to enter Iran, adding that the nuclear issue has been postponed to a later stage of talks.

Regarding the issue of unfreezing Iranian assets, Bahreini said, "Iran is the only country that will decide how to use its own assets. Therefore, I reject any claim [by Washington] that another country should have a role in these decisions or influence them."

Regarding Donald Trump’s threatening messages during talks in Switzerland on implementation of the MoU, he said these statements posed a very serious risk to the diplomatic process.

Pezeshkian Rules Out Talks on Iran's Defense Capabilities, Says Missiles Prevented Fate of Gaza

Tuesday, 23 June 2026 7:12 PM

President Masoud Pezeshkian shakes hands with Pakistani PM Shahbaz Sharif during a state visit to Islamabad on June 23, 2026.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said that Tehran would never negotiate over its defense and deterrence capabilities, arguing that the country's missile arsenal had prevented it from suffering the same fate as Gaza.

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian on Tuesday firmly ruled out any negotiations over Iran's military capabilities, saying the country's defense strength was essential to safeguarding its sovereignty against external threats.

Speaking alongside Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif during a joint press conference in Islamabad, Pezeshkian said Iran would never discuss its defense and deterrence capabilities with any party under any circumstances.

"We will never negotiate with anyone over our defense capabilities," he said. "Had we not built the missiles needed to defend ourselves, Israel and the United States would have treated Iran as they treated Gaza, showing no mercy to the old or the young."

The Iranian president said Tehran's military strength had served as a deterrent against aggression, rejecting calls for discussions on the country's defense program.

"The Islamic Republic of Iran will never, under any conditions, hold talks with any side about its defense and deterrence capabilities," he said.

Pezeshkian arrives in Pakistan on first foreign trip since Iran’s victory over US-Israeli aggression

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian arrived in Islamabad on Monday, where he was welcomed by Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif at the start of his visit to the Pakistani capital.

Pezeshkian also criticized Western countries that portray themselves as defenders of human rights, saying such claims were inconsistent with their actions.

"Those who speak of human rights are telling a great lie," he said. "If we were unable to defend ourselves, they certainly would not have shown mercy to our country and would have sought to destroy our power."

His remarks came amid lingering tensions between Tehran and Washington despite a recently signed memorandum of understanding aimed at ending a war that erupted following US-Israeli aggression against Iran earlier this year.

Pakistan played a key role in facilitating the Iran-US MoU, with Prime Minister Sharif and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir helping mediate negotiations. The agreement paved the way for a ceasefire and outlined future discussions on issues including sanctions relief and regional security.

However, Iranian officials have repeatedly stressed that any future diplomacy must lead to the full implementation of the agreement, including the lifting of sanctions and guarantees against further military action.

Pezeshkian's comments on Iran's defense posture came during a one-day visit to Pakistan, where he held talks with Sharif, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari and Field Marshal Munir.

Opening his remarks with verses from renowned poet Muhammad Iqbal, the Iranian president described Tehran-Islamabad ties as being rooted in mutual respect, goodwill and historical trust.

He said discussions with Pakistani leaders had covered bilateral relations as well as regional and international developments, adding that both sides were determined to capitalize on the current positive atmosphere to open "a new chapter" in relations.

Pezeshkian said Iran believes peace, stability and prosperity in West Asia and the Persian Gulf can only be achieved through sincere dialogue, regional cooperation and interactions based on mutual respect.

Iran, Pakistan discuss strategic cooperation as Pezeshkian meets Munir and Zardari in Islamabad

President Masoud Pezeshkian and Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir discuss regional developments, bilateral relations and ways to expand strategic cooperation between Tehran and Islamabad.

He also called for closer cooperation among Muslim countries, saying Iran was extending "the hand of friendship" to regional states in pursuit of a new security architecture. He named Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Turkey as countries that could play an effective role in shaping such a framework.

The Iranian president thanked Pakistan's leadership and people for what he described as their support for Iran during the recent war.

"The people of Pakistan stood sincerely and wholeheartedly by our side from the beginning of this war," he said. "We have come here to express our gratitude for that unwavering support."

'Productive discussions'

Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif described his talks with Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian as "very productive discussions in a very cordial atmosphere," saying the meeting felt "like a family reunion" between two brotherly nations.

He stressed that Pakistan and Iran have consistently supported each other during difficult times and that recent events had once again demonstrated the strength of their partnership.

Sharif called the visit a "historic moment between Pakistan and Iran" and welcomed the end of the war between Iran and the United States under the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding.

He said it was "a matter of great happiness that this war has come to an end, which could have engulfed the entire region and beyond."

The premier highlighted Pakistan's role as an "honest and sincere mediator" in the peace process and thanked Iran's leadership for trusting Islamabad's efforts. He also praised the support provided by Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Egypt in facilitating diplomacy.

Expressing solidarity with Iran, Sharif said, "Your happiness is our happiness. Your sorrow is our sorrow," adding, "Iran’s success is our success. Iran’s loss is our loss." He announced plans to visit Tehran next week to attend the funeral procession of the late Islamic Revolution Leader Martyr Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei.

Senate for First Time Approves a War Powers Resolution in a Rebuke to Trump over Iran Conflict

LISA MASCARO

Tue, June 23, 2026 at 1:37 PM EDT

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate for the first time approved a war powers resolution Tuesday seeking to block U.S. military action against Iran, as lawmakers warily watch President Donald Trump's efforts to resolve a conflict that the administration launched on its own and now needs Congress to fund.

It was the 10th time the Senate has tried to stop the war, and the outcome, on a vote of 50-48, was a stunning turnaround from past efforts. While the resolution is largely symbolic, and does not carry the full force of law, it reflects the growing concerns from a number of Republican lawmakers in both the House and Senate over both the war and the deal Trump struck with Iran to end it. The House approved the resolution earlier this month.

"Time after time, the vast majority of Senate Republicans sided with Trump and his war instead of the American people," said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer of New York.

Schumer said Americans have paid the price for "Trump's historic blunder in Iran. It'll go down in the history books as one of the worst foreign policy forays America has ever made."

In the past, as many as four GOP senators have voted for the war powers resolutions, and they did so Tuesday — Republicans Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Susan Collins of Maine, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Bill Cassidy of Louisiana. One Democrat, Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania, voted against.

On this vote, the absence of two Republicans, including Sen. Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, who was admitted to the hospital recently for an undisclosed matter, left the GOP without a full majority to halt the effort. Sen. Dave McCormick, R-Pa., also missed the vote.

The vote comes as the Pentagon is seeking $80 billion from Congress mostly for the Iran war as it backfills munitions and stockpiles.

Trump to meet senators as Republicans balk at Iran deal

Trump himself is headed to the Capitol on Wednesday to meet with GOP senators after Vice President JD Vance was overseas working to negotiate with Iran to end its nuclear ambitions — which had been among the stated rationales for the war.

The president is not pleased with the Republicans who have been critical of the deal he struck with Iran, according to one GOP senator granted anonymity to discuss the private dynamics.

The terms of the Iran deal are spelled out in a memorandum of understanding that Trump signed last week, starting a 60-day clock for the sides to reach a broader agreement over ending Iran's nuclear program.

But Republicans have particularly objected to the $300 billion fund to help Iran rebuild, which is far greater than the $1.7 billion then-President Barack Obama refunded the country under his administration's 2015 Iran deal.

"I believe President Trump is getting very poor advice on Iran," Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, said last week on his podcast after the deal was made public.

Democrats have repeatedly forced Iran votes

Over and again, Democrats have been forcing votes on the Iran war, almost since the U.S. and Israel launched missile strikes on Iran on Feb. 28.

Nearly each week they're in session, the Senate Democrats have put forward war powers resolutions, but they have failed to amass the majority needed for passage in the narrowly split chamber, where Trump's Republican Party holds the majority. Trump would almost certainly veto any measure that passed.

The House pushed its own version to passage earlier this month, with four Republicans joining all Democrats in approving the war powers resolution, over the objections of House Speaker Mike Johnson and the GOP leadership.

While the House- and Senate-passed resolution does not go to the president for his signature, passage stands as a powerful, if symbolic, statement from Congress and a rebuke of the administration's military actions.

Sen. Tim Kaine, the Democrat from Virginia who has led his party's efforts, said the pause in warfighting, as Trump's team works to shore up a fragile ceasefire, provides the perfect time for Congress to step back and assess "what should the next chapter be."

Hegseth seeks $80 billion from Congress for the Iran war

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is on Capitol Hill this week, seeking roughly $80 billion in supplemental funding to shore up defense supplies in the aftermath of the Iran war, which is drawing scrutiny when many Americans are reeling from high gas prices and costs of living.

The Pentagon early on had estimated the war cost $11.3 billion during its first week, and senators said experts put the overall price tag of Operation Epic Fury higher, at some $100 billion.

The Defense Department's funding request is part of a broader beef-up of military money the White House wants as part of its budget request this year.

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries said Tuesday, "We should not spend another dime of taxpayer dollars on Operation Epic Failure."

The Trump administration is seeking $1.5 trillion in defense funding this year — a nearly 50% increase — including $350 billion that it wants in a so-called budget reconciliation package. Johnson and GOP leaders are working to pass that package on their own, over the objections of Democrats, much the way they approved Trump's big tax cuts bill last year.

The 2025 tax cuts package also included a sizable increase for the military.

Revolving Door in Britain and the Crisis of Governance in the West

The resignation of Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will result in the seventh leader in the United Kingdom in a decade as the working class faces worsening socioeconomic conditions amid a growth in far-right electoral successes and racist violence in the streets

By Abayomi Azikiwe

Editor, Pan-African News Wire

Monday June 22, 2026

Political Review

After months of political defections and electoral defeats on the local level, UK Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer announced his resignation as leader of the ruling Labor Party.

Starmer, who came into office two years ago with a mandate to reverse the 14-year devastating rule by the Conservative Party, has failed to make significant changes which would benefit the majority of the working class and people of color communities throughout the country. 

On the morning of June 22, Starmer walked out of 10 Downing Street and declared that he would exit his position while allowing a leadership contest beginning on July 9. It is anticipated that the former Mayor of Greater Manchester, Andy Burnham, will be the next leader of the Labor Party and Prime Minister.

Burnham won a recent by-election in Makerfield in the North of England, coming out ahead of the far-right Reform Party led by Nigel Farage. The Labor Party, after suffering huge defeats by Reform in the most recent local government elections, quickly sought to have him replace Starmer in an effort to salvage the political status of the organization.

Burnham traveled by train from Manchester to Central London on June 22 to be sworn into parliament at the Palace of Westminster. His reception by Labor Members of Parliament (MPs) was enthusiastic when he entered the chambers to be sworn in by the Speaker of the House of Commons. Yet, the question is will this shift in leadership for Labor change the fortunes of the people of the UK who are suffering deteriorating economic conditions?

In an article published by the Morning Star, the daily newspaper of the Communist Party of Great Britain (CPGB), it notes that the failure of Starmer requires radical change in order to improve the living conditions of the working class. The British trade union movement has long expressed dissatisfaction with Starmer and his Labor government for its inability to raise wages, improve the conditions within the battered National Health Services (NHS) and raise the levels of anticipation for young people facing massive unemployment and impoverishment.

The Morning Star said on June 22 that:

“Unions welcomed Sir Keir Starmer’s decision to quit today but warned that the government needed a radical shift in policies as well as leadership. Unite general secretary Sharon Graham called Sir Keir’s move ‘right and honorable,’ adding ‘There is no time to waste, everyday people are literally on their knees. Labor has one last shot to learn from the errors of the last two years. A failure to act will result in a doomsday scenario for Labor. In the short term we need policies that make workers’ lives easier.’ National Education Union (NEU) general secretary Daniel Kebede insisted the ‘stakes could not be higher’ and insisted the next prime minister must fix the funding crisis in schools. He said, ‘The country had seen enough of Keir Starmer’s government to know that it is not going to deliver the meaningful change that was promised by Labor two years ago. If we have more of the same from our next prime minister, we risk sleepwalking into the disaster that would be a Reform UK government. Whoever does replace Keir Starmer needs to set Britain on a different economic path and deliver fundamental change.’” (https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/unions-welcome-starmers-departure-and-warn-labour-need-radical-shift-policies)

Starmer Led a Purge of Labor MPs on the Left Charging Them Falsely with Antisemitism and Challenging His Corporate-oriented Agenda

Over the last few years, the Labor Party in Britain has moved to the right by removing many stalwarts who advocated solidarity with Palestine. Britain has been a focal point in opposing the genocide taking place in Gaza and Palestine as a whole.

Demonstrations involving millions were held on a weekly basis as the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) carried out its carnage in Gaza after the escalation of the struggle in October 2023. When Starmer and the majority Labor parliament took office two years ago the mass demonstrations against the political, economic and military support to Tel Aviv continued.

Starmer refused to openly denounce the apartheid regime in Occupied Palestine. He would eventually “recognize a Palestinian state” with no real consequences for actual conditions on the ground in Gaza and the West Bank. 

The grassroots movement known as Palestine Action has been criminalized by the British state. After the UK Court dismissed the claims that Palestine Action was a terrorist organization, an appeals decision reimposed this designation, making it a criminal offense to even mention the name of the organization. 

One of the most egregious actions of the current Labor government was the appointment of Lord Peter Mendelson to the position of UK Ambassador to the United States. Mendelson was a close confidant of deceased child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. 

Mendelson was compelled to resign from his position in Washington due to documents released in the Epstein files which the administration of President Donald Trump sought to suppress. Political pressure from both the U.S. House of Representatives and the Senate forced the release of many files which were heavily redacted. 

After the second ascendancy of Trump to the presidency in early 2025, Starmer ran to the White House carrying an invitation from the British royal family requesting a state visit by the Republican head-of-state. When Trump did visit England, he was largely confined to areas around the royal palace due to mass demonstrations taking place in London against his presence in the country. 

Many of his own Labor MPs began to demand Starmer’s resignation. Subsequently, resignations by leading Labor Party cabinet ministers eroded his political base of support. The British press seriously questioned his judgment involving appointments and his inability to resolve fundamental issues within the country.  

Former Labor leader Jeremy Corbin has established an alternative grouping called “Your Party.” He along with other Labor MPs formed this party to continue their advocacy for the rights of working people.

According to the Morning Star on June 22, Zara Sultana of Your Party along with the rising Greens, foresaw the collapse of the Starmer government, saying:

“YOUR Party MP Zarah Sultana said ‘good riddance’ to the departing Keir Starmer today.The Coventry South MP, suspended from Labor by Sir Keir for challenging the two-child benefit cap, said that ‘history will judge Keir Starmer as a man who lied his way to the top of the Labor Party.’ She accused him of using that power to evoke Enoch Powell with his ‘island of strangers’ speech, keeping children in poverty, attacking disabled people, scapegoating refugees, stripping back civil liberties, and handing our public services to Palantir. ‘A man who gave the top diplomatic job to the ‘best pal’ of a convicted pedophile, said Israel has the right to cut off water and electricity to Gaza, rolled out the red carpet for Israeli war criminals, and kept the weapons flowing to the Israeli military as it committed genocide. Good riddance,’ she added. Green Party leader Zack Polanski called for ‘a bold change of direction’ after Sir Keir’s departure. He said, ‘Starmer lost the confidence of the country because of his abject failure to challenge the power and wealth of an Establishment which has taken for themselves while leaving the vast majority in a cost-of-living crisis. We are still waiting to see which version of Andy Burnham is going to show up in Downing Street. While he has talked about a change of course, the early indications are not encouraging and suggest more of the same with better communication skills. The time for half measures and sticking plasters is long gone — Burnham must be bold or he will be bust.’” (https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/sultana-says-good-riddance-starmer)

Britain and Other Imperialist States Facing the Threat of Fascism

There is a real threat of the imposition of fascism in the UK as exemplified by the rising electoral support for the Reform Party led by Nigel Farage. In the last local government elections, Reform won more seats than any other party. 

Manifestations such as the “Unite the Kingdom” rallies have illustrated the rising specter of racist violence and imperialist war. Soon after Starmer took office in 2024, racists attacked residences of migrants demanding that they leave the UK. 

In recent weeks in Belfast Northern Ireland, people from Loyalist areas burned vehicles, buses and the homes of people of color. Reform and other right-wing formations are demanding the mass deportation of people from Africa, Latin America and Asia.

These actions mirror events inside the U.S. where state entities such as the Immigration and Custom Enforcement (ICE) have conducted raids throughout the country arresting, brutalizing and killing suspected undocumented migrants and those who oppose the administration’s anti-immigrant policies.

In other western industrialized states such as France and Germany, far right parties are growing in popularity. These parties and organizations are being heavily influenced by financiers based in the U.S. who are utilizing the concept of “free speech” to promote racism and violence against people of color and migrants.

These issues will continue until there are broad-based united fronts to reverse the fascist threats. The U.S. and Western Europe will undoubtedly continue to decline under the economic policies which favor the rich at the expense of the working people and nationally oppressed.

Ethiopia Unveils Landmark Refugee Inclusion Roadmap, Setting New Standard for Africa

Addis Ababa, June 18, 2026 (ENA) —Ethiopia has launched the groundbreaking Makatet Roadmap, a comprehensive national framework aimed at advancing the socio-economic inclusion of refugees while strengthening opportunities and services for host communities.

Officially unveiled at the Adwa Victory Memorial Museum, the roadmap marks a historic shift from traditional humanitarian assistance toward a long-term, government-led development approach that integrates refugees into national systems and promotes self-reliance.

The initiative seeks to transform refugee settlements into inclusive and sustainable communities linked to Ethiopia’s education, healthcare, and economic development systems, benefiting both refugees and the communities that host them.

Speaking at the launch, Tagesse Chafo described the roadmap as a landmark national strategy that will expand protection, opportunity, and shared prosperity for refugees and host communities alike.

Director-General of the Refugees and Returnees Service, Teyiba Hassen, said the initiative represents a decisive move beyond traditional encampment policies, establishing a unified framework in which refugees and local communities can thrive together.

Minister of Finance Ahmed Shide emphasized that integrating refugee services into national systems will improve resource efficiency, strengthen economic resilience, and create sustainable development outcomes.

The roadmap received strong endorsement from international partners. 

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Barham Salih on his part praised Ethiopia’s refugee response, described the launch of the Refugee Inclusive Socio-Economic Roadmap as a milestone in improving refugee livelihoods. 

He expressed appreciation for the leadership of Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed and praised Ethiopia's longstanding tradition of providing refuge to people fleeing conflict, persecution, and instability.

Meanwhile, African Union Commissioner for Infrastructure and Energy Lerato Dorothy Mataboge said the Makatet Roadmap offers a timely and practical example of how African countries can translate refugee inclusion commitments into concrete action. She noted that Ethiopia's initiative has consistently been highlighted as a model of political commitment, national ownership, and whole-of-government engagement.

According to the commissioner, the roadmap demonstrates how refugee inclusion, self-reliance, and durable solutions can be advanced in line with Agenda 2063's vision of an integrated, prosperous, and inclusive Africa that leaves no one behind.

Widely hailed as a pioneering framework, the Makatet Roadmap positions Ethiopia at the forefront of refugee inclusion efforts on the continent, offering a compelling blueprint for balancing refugee protection with sustainable national development and community resilience.

Seventh General Election Peaceful, Orderly and Transparent, Says EWLA

Addis Ababa, June 21, 2026 (ENA) —The Ethiopian Women Lawyers Association has reaffirmed that Ethiopia’s Seventh General Election, held on June 1, 2026, was conducted in a peaceful, orderly, transparent, and inclusive manner.

Speaking at the official election results announcement ceremony organized by the National Election Board of Ethiopia today, EWLA Executive Director Hiberet Abahoy said the election was free, fair, and peaceful in the areas observed by the association.

Hiberet noted that EWLA implemented extensive election observation and protection measures throughout the electoral process to promote women’s participation and safeguard their rights.

“We successfully carried out our planned activities to prevent violence against women during the election period and to create a safe environment where women could exercise their democratic rights without fear,” she said.

According to the Executive Director, EWLA monitored the electoral process at 136 polling stations across the country and found that voting was conducted in a free, peaceful, orderly, and transparent manner.

She stated that voter turnout was encouraging and that the calm and secure environment enabled women to participate confidently in the election process and freely exercise their democratic rights.

Hiberet further emphasized that the orderly conduct of the election and the active participation of women reflected meaningful progress toward a more inclusive, credible, and representative democratic process.

She added that EWLA worked closely with government institutions, civil society organizations, development partners, and other stakeholders to ensure that women were able to exercise their constitutionally guaranteed rights without intimidation or discrimination throughout the election period.

Commending the efforts of NEBE, Hiberet said the measures undertaken by the Board from the pre-election period through polling day were encouraging and contributed significantly to enhancing women’s safety, participation, and confidence in the electoral process.

As part of its election observation mission, EWLA monitored 136 polling stations nationwide on election day. The association’s findings indicated that a significant number of women cast their votes for political parties they believed would best safeguard their security, wellbeing, and interests.

The observation report also revealed that 92.5 percent of the polling stations observed were accessible to pregnant women, nursing mothers, older persons, and people with disabilities, demonstrating a strong commitment to inclusivity and equal participation.

Hiberet underscored that the successful conduct of the Seventh General Election was made possible through the coordinated efforts of civil society organizations, development partners, government institutions, election officials, and other stakeholders.

“The success of the election demonstrates the importance of collaboration among all actors involved in the democratic process,” she said.

She concluded by stressing that continued cooperation among stakeholders will be essential to further strengthening Ethiopia’s democratic institutions and promoting inclusive participation in future elections.

Monday, June 22, 2026

Prosperity Party Wins with Huge Majority in Ethiopia’s June 1 Election

Addis Ababa, June 21, 2026 (ENA) —The National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE) has officially announced the final results of Ethiopia’s Seventh General Election for both the House of People’s Representatives and Regional State Councils.

The Board has confirmed a decisive victory for the ruling Prosperity Party.

According to the results released today, the Prosperity Party secured the largest share of seats nationwide, winning an overwhelming majority in both the federal parliament and regional councils.

The results were announced by NEBE Deputy Chairperson Tesfaye Neway during an official ceremony attended by President Taye Atske Selassie, NEBE Chairperson Melatwork Hailu, leaders of political parties, representatives of civic organizations, ambassadors, international partners, and other invited guests.

As the Prosperity Party won a majority of seats in the House of Peoples’ Representatives, it has secured the mandate for the incumbent party to form the next federal government and appoint a new cabinet.

The party also registered strong performances in regional council elections, winning majorities in several regional states and further consolidating its political position across the country.

The announcement marks the culmination of one of the largest electoral exercises in Ethiopia’s history. 

Over 54 million citizens registered to vote, with millions participating in the nationwide electoral process.

The final results indicate that Ethiopian voters have given the Prosperity Party a decisive mandate to lead the country’s next phase of governance and development.

Prosperity Party Secures Landslide Victory, Pledges to Advance Democracy and National Prosperity

ADDIS ABABA, June 21, 2026 (ENA) — The Prosperity Party has secured a commanding mandate to form Ethiopia’s next government following the official announcement of the final results of the country’s 7th General Election.

The National Election Board of Ethiopia (NEBE) today officially released the final results for elections to the House of People’s Representatives and Regional State Councils, confirming a decisive victory for the ruling Prosperity Party.

In a statement issued following the announcement, the Party reaffirmed its commitment to deepen democratic governance, accelerate development, and strengthen national unity.

According to the results, the party won an overwhelming majority of seats nationwide, securing the largest representation in both the federal parliament and regional councils and earning the mandate to lead the next administration.

Prosperity Party expressed profound gratitude to the Ethiopian people for the trust bestowed upon it, stressing that it accepts the victory with humility, responsibility, and a renewed commitment to public service.

The party also commended the more than 54 million citizens who participated in the electoral process, as well as political parties, election officials, observers, security institutions, and international partners who contributed to the peaceful and successful conduct of the polls.

Describing the election as a significant milestone in Ethiopia’s democratic journey, the party noted that the peaceful, free, and credible completion of the vote reflects the growing maturity of the nation’s democratic institutions and demonstrates Africa’s capacity to build and sustain home-grown democratic systems.

With a renewed mandate from the electorate, the Prosperity Party pledged to intensify efforts to deliver inclusive economic growth, improve livelihoods, and create greater opportunities for citizens across the country.

The party outlined key priorities for its new term, including strengthening the rule of law, stabilizing the cost of living, enhancing food security, expanding employment opportunities, and accelerating sustainable economic transformation.

It also vowed to modernize public service delivery through technology-driven reforms, eliminate bureaucratic inefficiencies, strengthen the fight against corruption, and support the successful completion of the National Dialogue process to foster lasting peace, national consensus, and social cohesion.

Reaffirming its vision of building a prosperous, democratic, and united Ethiopia, the Prosperity Party stated that the renewed public mandate represents both a vote of confidence and a call to deliver tangible results for all citizens.

The party pledged to work closely with all stakeholders to transform the aspirations expressed through the ballot box into meaningful progress, ensuring a future defined by peace, shared prosperity, and national renewal.

Cape Verde Fans Celebrate as Team's Magical World Cup Start Keeps Going

Cape Verde supporters celebrate after the World Cup Group H soccer match between Uruguay and Cape Verde in Brockton, Mass., June 21, 2026

By Africa News

Cape Verde’s magical start to its first World Cup isn’t over.

It might just be getting started.

The tiny island nation that stunned tournament favorite Spain last week did it again against Uruguay on Sunday, coming from behind for a 2-2 draw.

Kevin Pina scored on a free kick for Cape Verde’s first-ever goal in the World Cup.

Helio Varela scored the equalizer for what has become one of the most surprising teams of the expanded 48-team tournament – a club now with a legitimate chance of getting into the knockout stage.

The results sparked spontaneous celebrations at a large watch party in a restaurant in the Massachusetts town of Brockton, home to one of the largest Cape Verdean communities in the United States.

Celebrations quickly spilled onto the streets, where drivers honked their horns, passengers waved the Cape Verdean flag and team jersey and other residents lit fireworks.

"We come from a lineage of being comeback champs," said Denise Mendes, a Cape Verdean living in the US. "So we're here to compete. So don't underestimate CV (Cape Verde) because we're to go as far as we can get. But as far I'm concerned, I'm very proud of my country because we've definitely made headway. Yeah, made ourselves known."

Cape Verde's next match is against Saudi Arabia on Saturday.

Arab League Confirms Egyptian Diplomat Nabil Fahmy as Secretary General

Egyptian foreign minister Nabil Fahmy, right, accompanies his Russian counterpart Sergei Lavrov following their meeting in Cairo, Egypt, Thursday, Nov. 14, 2013.

Arab League

The Arab League on Monday confirmed Egyptian veteran diplomat Nabil Fahmy as its new chief during a meeting of foreign ministers in Amman, a statement said.

Fahmy's five-year term as secretary general is to begin at the start of July, succeeding Ahmed Aboul Gheit who served two consecutive terms as head of the regional body.

The former top diplomat, who led Egypt's foreign ministry from June 2013 to July 2014, will become the eighth Egyptian head of the Cairo-based regional bloc. He was unanimously nominated for the post in March.

The 22-member bloc has only had one non-Egyptian secretary general -- Tunisian Chedli Klibi in the 1980s -- when Egypt was suspended for signing a peace deal with Israel, at the time breaking a regional consensus.

Fahmy, 75, said in March that the role was a "great responsibility" to bear, given "the blatant violations of international law perpetrated by aggressors who have treacherously attacked our countries and our security, and by others whose prolonged occupation of our lands have obstructed our brothers from exercising their legitimate rights".

He did not explicitly name Iran or Israel, but his statement echoed his predecessor's line on both.

The Arab League, founded in 1945, is a mostly political forum for Arab countries to discuss and communicate points of consensus.

More Than 3000 Malawian Nationals Deported in South Africa

Malawian migrants stand in a queue for their deportation at a temporary centre, in South Africa, Thursday, June 18, 2026. (AP Photo/Themba Hadebe)

Malawi

More than 3000 Malawian nationals have been deported in South Africa after thousands protested earlier this year in Johannesburg and other parts of the country against illegal immigration that has fueled tensions between locals and foreign nationals.

Stella Ndau, High Commissioner of Malawi to South Africa said: "Since the repatriation started, we have 1,549 that have arrived in Malawi. We have about 1,260 that are en route, and we also have 700 that were deported, so in total we have 3,509 Malawians that have been repatriated and also with the assistance of the South African government 700 that have gone to Malawi."

South Africa started building a second temporary deportation center on Thursday to process the repatriation of Malawians. The new site is meant to alleviate the unfolding crisis that has seen women and young children packed in the overcrowded site with thousands of men.

Meanwhile, thousands more Malawian nationals arrived at the first deportation center, also in the city of Durban, in an area known as Sherwood, where an estimated 10,000 have been camping for more than a week, waiting to be sent home. Pearson Kaunda who is a Malawian National and has been residing in South Africa for over 10 years told The Associated Press things are not good in the country.

"South Africa, I'm telling you is so bad just now. So we're supposed to go home, you can't live here like that." South African and Malawian authorities have been coordinating in recent weeks to facilitate the repatriation of thousands of Malawian citizens gathered at the site in Durban, claiming to flee anti-migrant tensions and fears of violence.

However, South African officials said the deportation process required the Malawians to appear in court as they were in the country illegally. The process has also been slow due to insufficient number of buses sent by the Malawian government, which has also asked for donations to help bus the returnees home, the officials said.

Malawi is the latest among at least three African countries to facilitate the repatriation of some of their citizens from South Africa as frustrations over illegal migration in the country worsen and some foreign national express fear of violent attacks.

Britain's Revolving Door: The Fall of Six Prime Ministers in a Decade of Political Upheaval

Jun 22, 2026, 02:35:00 PM 

Synopsis

Britain braces for its seventh prime minister in a decade as Keir Starmer resigns, marking another turbulent chapter. Since the 2016 Brexit vote, a whirlwind of crises from negotiations to pandemics has seen leaders fall rapidly. Each departure highlights a nation grappling with immense challenges, leaving the next leader to tackle economic woes and public trust.

With Keir Starmer announcing his resignation, Britain is preparing for its seventh prime minister in a decade. Since the Brexit referendum in 2016, six prime ministers have left office, each brought down by a different combination of political, economic and electoral pressures.

The period has seen Brexit negotiations, the Covid-19 pandemic, market turmoil, leadership challenges and general election defeats reshape British politics. No prime minister since David Cameron has completed a full term in office, making the past decade one of the most turbulent periods for leadership changes in recent UK history.

The extraordinary turnover means Britain has changed prime ministers almost every 18 months on average over the past decade. No other period in modern British political history has witnessed such rapid leadership change outside wartime.

The Economic Times

From David Cameron's resignation after losing the Brexit referendum to Starmer's downfall following Labour's internal rebellion, each departure tells the story of a country struggling to navigate one crisis after another.

Also Read| Keir Starmer steps down as Labour Party leader, says will remain UK PM until successor chosen

David Cameron (May 2010 – July 2016)

Time in office: 6 years, 2 months

David Cameron triggered the chain of events that would reshape British politics. Seeking to settle divisions within his Conservative Party, he called a referendum on Britain's membership of the European Union.

The gamble failed. On June 23, 2016, voters backed Brexit by 52 percent to 48 percent. Cameron, who had campaigned to remain in the EU, concluded that he could not lead the negotiations for a policy he opposed.

Less than 24 hours after the result, he announced his resignation.

His departure marked the beginning of a decade dominated by Brexit and political instability.

Theresa May (July 2016 – July 2019)

Theresa May inherited one of the most difficult tasks faced by any modern British leader: taking the country out of the European Union while keeping Parliament united.

She negotiated a Brexit withdrawal agreement with Brussels, but lawmakers rejected the deal three times. Hardline Brexit supporters argued it kept Britain too closely tied to Europe, while pro-European MPs believed it would damage the economy.

Unable to break the deadlock and facing growing pressure from her own party, May announced her resignation in May 2019.

Boris Johnson (July 2019 – September 2022)

Boris Johnson came to power promising to end the Brexit stalemate. He secured a large parliamentary majority and completed Britain's exit from the European Union.

However, his premiership became overshadowed by controversy.

The most damaging scandal involved reports that parties and social gatherings had taken place inside government buildings while strict COVID-19 restrictions were in force. The "Partygate" affair triggered investigations, fines and widespread public anger.

The final blow came when dozens of ministers resigned from his government in July 2022, arguing he could no longer govern effectively. Johnson resigned soon after.

Liz Truss (September 2022 – October 2022)

Liz Truss became prime minister promising tax cuts and faster economic growth.

Her government unveiled a major package of unfunded tax reductions and borrowing plans known as the "mini-budget." Financial markets reacted sharply. The pound fell, government borrowing costs surged and pension funds faced severe stress.

The economic shock rattled investors and Conservative MPs alike.

Support for Truss collapsed within weeks. She resigned after just 49 days, becoming the shortest-serving prime minister in British history.

Rishi Sunak (October 2022 – July 2024)

Rishi Sunak took over with a promise to restore stability after the Truss crisis.

While his government helped calm financial markets and reduce inflation, voters remained frustrated by rising living costs, strained public services and slow economic growth.

After months of poor polling, Sunak called a general election in 2024.

The Conservatives suffered a historic defeat, ending 14 years in power. Sunak accepted responsibility for the result and left office.

Keir Starmer (July 2024 – June 2026)

Keir Starmer entered Downing Street after leading Labour to a landslide victory in the 2024 general election.

Initially viewed as the leader who would restore stability after years of Conservative turmoil, Starmer soon faced challenges of his own. Labour's popularity declined sharply amid voter dissatisfaction over economic conditions, immigration, public services and government performance. Poor local election results in 2026 intensified criticism from within the party.

His position weakened further after senior ministers resigned and Labour MPs openly discussed replacing him. Pressure increased after former Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham returned to Parliament and emerged as a potential leadership challenger.

On June 22, 2026, Starmer announced his resignation, saying he had informed King Charles III of his decision. Reports indicated that he concluded he no longer had sufficient support within the parliamentary party to continue effectively. He is expected to remain in office until Labour chooses a successor.

Britain's seventh Prime Minister in a decade

With Keir Starmer stepping down, attention has shifted to who could become Britain's next prime minister and Labour leader.

Former Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is widely seen as one of the leading contenders. Burnham, a former cabinet minister who served under Labour governments before moving into local politics, has long been regarded as a prominent figure within the party. His criticism of some government policies and his strong profile outside Westminster have led many Labour MPs to view him as a potential successor.

Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner is also expected to be discussed as a possible candidate. As one of Labour's most senior figures, Rayner has played a key role in the government and retains support among sections of the party.

Other names being mentioned include Health Secretary Wes Streeting and Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, both of whom hold senior cabinet positions and have significant experience in national politics.

Labour's rules require the party to elect a new leader through a contest involving MPs, party members and affiliated supporters. Until a successor is chosen, Starmer will remain in office in a caretaker capacity.

Whoever emerges victorious will become Britain's seventh prime minister since the 2016 Brexit referendum and inherit a government facing pressure to improve economic growth, public services and voter confidence.

A Decade of Chaos: Britain Prepares for Seventh Prime Minister

LONDON — British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would quit on Monday, paving the way for the country to have its seventh leader in 10 years.

The chaos dates back to the Brexit referendum, 10 years ago to the day on Tuesday.

In the years since the vote, Britain has tried to forge its own path but struggled to boost its low-growth economy, hamstrung by high debts and a growing welfare bill, at a time of growing geopolitical volatility.

JUNE 2016: UK VOTES FOR BREXIT, PM CAMERON QUITS

Britons cause a global shock by voting 52%-48% to leave the European Union, ending a more than 40-year union and plunging the country into its biggest political crisis since World War II. Conservative Prime Minister David Cameron resigns, and the party chooses Theresa May to succeed him.

JUNE 2017: SNAP ELECTION GAMBLE BACKFIRES

Riding high in opinion polls and seeking a bigger majority in parliament to push Brexit legislation through, May calls a snap election. The Conservatives lose their majority and form a government by striking a deal with Northern Ireland's pro-UK Democratic Unionist Party.

MAY 2019: BREXIT PARALYSIS, MAY RESIGNS, JOHNSON TAKES OVER

May quits after failing to break a parliamentary deadlock over how Britain should leave the EU. Boris Johnson, one of the main faces of the pro-Brexit campaign, wins the internal Conservative Party contest to succeed her.

BRITAIN-EU/

Britain's Prime Minister Boris Johnson gestures during a press conference at the European Union leaders summit dominated by Brexit, in Brussels, Belgium, Oct. 17, 2019.

DECEMBER 2019: JOHNSON LEADS CONSERVATIVES TO SWEEPING WIN

With parliament paralyzed over Brexit, Johnson calls a snap election. Campaigning under the slogan "Get Brexit Done," he steers the Conservatives to their biggest election win since Margaret Thatcher's landslide victory in 1987.

JANUARY 2020: BREXIT GETS DONE

Johnson uses his mandate to drive a Brexit deal through parliament and Brussels, and Britain exits the EU on Jan. 31, 2020, becoming the first state to withdraw from the bloc.

JULY 2022: JOHNSON OUSTED

Johnson leads Britain during the COVID-19 pandemic — at one point being hospitalized himself with the disease — but a long list of scandals and missteps proves too much, and he steps down after a ministerial revolt.

SEPTEMBER 2022: TRUSS' CHAOTIC PREMIERSHIP

Liz Truss beats Rishi Sunak in a contest to succeed Johnson. Her "mini-budget" containing unfunded tax cuts spooks financial markets, sharply pushing up borrowing costs and further tarnishing Britain's reputation for political and fiscal stability. She lasts only 44 days before announcing her resignation.

OCTOBER 2022: SUNAK BECOMES PRIME MINISTER

Sunak takes over as Britain's third prime minister in as many months, pledging to restore stability to government. He makes five key pledges focused on the economy, stopping illegal immigration and improving the health system. In February 2023, Sunak strikes a deal with the EU on trade rules for Northern Ireland, improving ties with the bloc.

MAY 2024: SUNAK CALLS ELECTION

Trailing the Labour Party by around 20 points in the polls, Sunak calls an election for July 4.

JULY 2024: STARMER BECOMES PRIME MINISTER

"We said we would end the chaos and we will," Keir Starmer, leader of the Labour Party, told supporters on July 5, 2024, after winning a landslide election but with the smallest share of the electoral vote of any majority government in modern history.

AUGUST 2024: STARMER WARNS 'THINGS WILL GET WORSE'

Starmer warns over the state of the public finances, saying the Labour Party has inherited "an economic black hole" and tells voters "things will get worse before they get better."

OCTOBER 2024: LABOUR'S FIRST BUDGET

Finance minister Rachel Reeves announces tax rises worth £40 billion ($52.76 billion) a year, primarily by raising employers' social security contributions, bringing the tax burden to its highest level on record in peacetime and prompting an outcry from businesses.

BRITAIN-POLITICS/MAKERFIELD

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage arrives at a polling station during the Makerfield by-election, triggered by the resignation of Labour MP John Simons, at St. Aidan's Parish Centre, Wigan, Britain, June 18.

FEBRUARY 2025: NIGEL FARAGE'S REFORM UK PARTY SURGES

Right-wing anti-immigration party Reform UK overtakes Labour in a national opinion poll for the first time. Reform UK, led by Brexit campaigner Nigel Farage, has topped polls ever since.

JUNE 2025: REBELLION FORCES STARMER U-TURN ON WELFARE

Starmer is forced to reverse plans to cut Britain's welfare bill after his own lawmakers threatened to defeat the government.

SEPTEMBER-APRIL 2025: MANDELSON SCANDAL

Pressure on Starmer ramps up over his appointment of Peter Mandelson as Britain's ambassador to Washington. Mandelson was later sacked over his ties to the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, as questions emerge over Starmer's judgment and the vetting process involved.

MAY 2026: LOCAL ELECTION DISASTER

The Labour Party suffers heavy losses in English local elections and votes for the Scottish and Welsh assemblies, deepening questions over Starmer's ability to govern, with Reform UK the main beneficiary.

BRITAIN-POLITICS/

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaks as he announces the timeline for his resignation, outside 10 Downing Street, in London, June 22.

MAY 2026: WES STREETING RESIGNS AS HEALTH MINISTER

Health Minister Wes Streeting quits saying he had lost confidence in Starmer's leadership and calls for a leadership contest, in which he said he would hope to compete.

JUNE 2026: DEFENCE MINISTER JOHN HEALEY QUITS

British Defence Minister John Healey quits over a months-long dispute over defense spending, accusing Starmer of failing to commit the money needed to keep the country safe from mounting threats.

JUNE 2026: ANDY BURNHAM SHOWS HE CAN BEAT REFORM UK

Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham wins an election in the north of England, trouncing Reform UK in the process, and allowing him to return to Westminster, removing a key obstacle to any leadership challenge against Starmer.

UK Leader Keir Starmer to Step Down as Prime Minister Two Years After Historic Election Victory

Labour leader bows to mounting pressure after Andy Burnham’s success against Reform UK in Makerfield

Mon 22 Jun 2026 07.19 EDT

Keir Starmer has announced he will stand down as prime minister after days of intense pressure from Labour MPs, paving the way for Andy Burnham to take over at Downing Street.

Less than two years after a historic election victory, Starmer had faced calls from his MPs, including privately from cabinet ministers, to set out a timeline for his departure, with many of them unnerved by the threat from Nigel Farage’s party before the next general election.

Starmer’s decision to announce his departure kickstarted the process to become the UK’s seventh prime minister in 10 years.

Burnham confirmed he would run for the Labour leadership, saying an “orderly and responsible” transition of power would ensure “stability, seriousness and a continued focus” on the issues that mattered most to the country.

Within minutes of Burnham’s statement, Wes Streeting – the politician most likely to have run against the former mayor of Greater Manchester – announced he was instead throwing his weight behind Burnham, making a coronation highly likely despite the misgivings of some MPs.

Burnham, who was travelling down to Westminster from Manchester on Monday, is likely to have just over three weeks to prepare for government, including confirming his policy priorities and picking his cabinet, with his choice of chancellor eagerly anticipated.

Under this timetable, he would be in office by the time of a big reset summit with the EU on 22 July. Key outstanding policy decisions such as on the defence investment plan are likely to be held back until his arrival.

Speaking on Monday from behind a lectern outside No 10, Starmer said: “The question my party is asking now is whether I am best placed to lead us into the next general election.

“I have heard the answer of my parliamentary party to that question, and I accept that answer with good grace. Every decision I have taken has been about putting the country I love first, that is why I will resign as leader of the Labour party.”

While Starmer had insisted on Friday that he would fight any leadership contest, conversations with ministers and time with his wife, Victoria, at Chequers over the weekend shifted his thinking.

More than half a dozen cabinet ministers are understood to have privately told him his time was up, while Starmer and his inner circle began work on drafts of a resignation speech on Saturday.

Starmer said he would ask Labour’s ruling national executive committee to set out a timetable for a contest with nominations opening on 9 July and completed by summer recess just a week later.

The prime minister said he would remain in post until parliament returned in September, meaning he would represent the UK at the next Nato summit in early July. But if there is no contest, as looks likely, Burnham could take over as early as 16 or 17 July.

In words aimed towards his likely successor, Starmer said he would do “everything I can” to ensure an orderly handover of power, despite what insiders have described as his earlier anger and frustration over Burnham’s ambitions.

“I will also give my successor my full and unequivocal support, knowing that they will inherit a Britain that is far stronger and fairer than the one I inherited two years ago, better prepared for the challenges ahead and better able to ensure the Labour party secures a second term in office,” he said.

Burnham is being sworn in as an MP on Monday afternoon after seeing off Reform UK to win the Makerfield byelection last week. He is then expected to easily clear the 81 nominations threshold required to run for leadership of the party, with his allies saying he has the support of well over 200 MPs.

In a statement shortly after Starmer’s resignation on Monday, Burnham said: “Keir has given huge service to our country and I want to thank him for his leadership and dedication during such a challenging period.

“His decision marks the beginning of a transition and it is important that this process is conducted in an orderly and responsible way. I will put myself forward as part of this process. The country expects stability, seriousness and a continued focus on the issues that matter most and that is what it will get.”

Streeting, the former health secretary who quit over Starmer’s leadership, also confirmed he would not be running, though it was unclear whether he had done any deal with the former mayor of Greater Manchester for a cabinet post.

“Having spoken at length with Andy in recent days, I’m convinced that there is a place for those ideas under his leadership; that he is committed to building an inclusive party that draws on the best of our political traditions; and that he can win the fight of our lives against the forces of nationalism,” he said.

“We could spend the summer exaggerating small differences, or we can roll up our sleeves and help him to deliver the change our party and our country needs. That is the choice that I am making and I hope that everyone else will back Andy, too.”

Starmer’s successor will take on the serious challenges of the UK economy and a precarious international backdrop, as well as Labour’s battle against the threat from Reform UK.

Some Labour MPs are concerned that Burnham may be unprepared for the role, and had wanted him to face the scrutiny of a full contest, although others feared that would have further damaged Labour’s ratings with the public, and that they should make as swift a transition as possible.

In his speech, which was watched on Downing Street by his closest ministerial allies and aides, Starmer’s voice broke with emotion as he paid tribute to friends and colleagues who had been at his side over the last six years as Labour leader – and to his family.

“When I leave the biggest job in the country, I shall spend more time on the most important job, being the best husband I can to my fantastic wife, Vic, who has been a rock by my side through good times and bad, and being the best dad I can to my beautiful children, who are my pride and my joy,” he said.

Starmer steps down after months of pressure over his leadership, which was first almost derailed in February when Anas Sarwar, the party’s leader in Scotland, called for him to quit. At that point, the cabinet rallied round him.

Despite his poor personal approval ratings, he had seemed on firmer ground in recent months over his handling of the Middle East crisis and refusal to do Donald Trump’s bidding by taking the UK into war with Iran.

However, any respite was blown apart when the Guardian revealed in April that Peter Mandelson, his controversial pick for UK ambassador to Washington, had been appointed despite failing his security vetting.

Mandelson’s appointment was the latest in what many inside Labour regard as a long line of political misjudgments by Starmer, including restricting winter fuel payments and welfare cuts, which caused the party to sink in the polls.

His willingness to reverse those decisions only added to his unpopularity among the parliamentary Labour party, large parts of which increasingly came to view him as weak and ineffectual. Some MPs were also concerned about his poor communication skills.

Multiple MPs were shocked by the scale of Starmer’s unpopularity on the doorstep as they campaigned during the May elections, which many believed became a lightning rod for wider frustrations with the political system itself.

As the results rolled in, with significant losses across the country, the scale of the electoral challenge facing Labour became clear, and the trickle of voices from MPs calling for Starmer to name an exit date turned into a steady stream.

The increasingly precarious nature of Starmer’s premiership was underlined by the resignation of Streeting days later – after seemingly failing to get the numbers to launch a challenge – and then a vacancy in the seat of Makerfield, which gave Burnham a route back into parliament.

Since then, Starmer has also lost his defence secretary, John Healey, over military spending plans, and a view settled among Labour MPs that Starmer’s leadership was so fragile that – despite his insistence he would fight on – his days in Downing Street were numbered.

Starmer’s exit caps a calamitous fall from grace since becoming only the fourth Labour leader to win an election, taking more seats in 2024 than anyone since Tony Blair’s landslide in 1997.