Failure of Anti-DPRK Hostile Policy Inevitable
Rodong Sinmun, organ of the Central Committee of the Workers’ Party of Korea, carried on its October 27 issue an article under the title of “Inevitable is the failure of anti-DPRK hostile policy of the US, empire of the devil”.
The article claimed that the US policy of hostility to the DPRK will inevitably end in failure as it is oblivious of the tradition of victory on the DPRK’s side and history of defeat on the part of the US in the DPRK-US showdown and as it dreamed of the DPRK’s system collapse”, starting from ignorance of its line and policy and views sanctions and pressure as an omnipotent means without knowing the DPRK’s independent characters.
It said:
The Fatherland Liberation War, or the Korean war in the 1950s, was a fierce military clash between the two-year-old DPRK and the imperialist allied forces led by the US, which boasted of being the “strongest” in the world. However, the US suffered the most ignominious defeat in the war, which can be claimed to be a conflict between rifle and A-bomb.
The same was true with Johnson and Nixon who threatened to start a war on the pretext of the capture of the USS Pueblo and interception of large reconnaissance plane EC-121 in the 1960s, Ford who blackmailed the DPRK with the Panmunjom incident in the 1970s and Clinton, Bush and Obama, who kicked up a fuss about the DPRK’s nuclear programme in the 1990s and early 2000s. They were also branded as losers in the showdown with the DPRK like the remnants of the defeated American troops in the Korean war.
A defeat can be seen as an incident, but if it is repeated twice or thrice, it is the inevitability.
The DPRK has faced the US for many years, and the latter, in the former’s eyes, is nothing but a low-brow and primitive group, whose members are busy satisfying their instinctive and impulsive greed while bluffing in front of the weak but are petrified of the strong rival.
However hard they try, the US politicians can never deny the history and tradition of heroic Korea which emerged victorious for years and they had better keep in mind that no “miracle” would be wrought for them.
The US likes to spread the argument about the “collapse” of the DPRK’s socialist system so often.
Underlying this preposterous argument made in the hope that the DPRK would collapse of its own accord and are the extreme ignorance about and prejudice against the essence and characteristic features of the DPRK system.
As steel is tempered in fire, the DPRK’s is the most advantageous people-centred socialism which has proven its validity and truthfulness and whose features and might have grown clearer and stronger in the tempests of the times.
Single-minded unity is the political basis of the DPRK’s society and cornerstone of its existence.
The US had better refrain from talking about the “collapse” of the DPRK which is based on single-mindedness that no force on earth can break, and worry about its own gloomy future which has gone steadily downhill due to its reactionary, corrupt and backward nature.
The lines and policies desired and supported by the people never fail, but succeed and win victory—it is science. Those of the DPRK state and the Workers’ Party of Korea are the reflection of the aspirations and demand of the masses of the people and the banner of struggle which illuminates the correct ways and methods.
The hostile forces refer to the temporary economic difficulties the DPRK suffers as a “failure”, but it is nothing more than a subjective expectation and self-deception of those stupefied by the world startling miraculous achievements that occur one after another in such harsh pressure that others must have succumbed to, and the happy laughter and merry songs of the locals who pull through the unimaginable trials and difficulties by dint of the spirit of self-development. They should see this reality squarely and talk about it accordingly.
The world-recognized DPRK’s nameplate is independence.
The DPRK has held fast to political independence as the grand principle of the revolution and construction without deviating even an inch from it, and emerged victorious under its banner.
The US probably expects something similar to that of its colonial stooge, south Korea, but the DPRK has never had and will never have any “suzerain state” or “big brother”.
It is an outrageous logic of the arrogant US that it can bring any country to its knees by waving the purse of dollars and wielding the nuclear stick, and it is fully embodied in its anti-DPRK policy of hostility. But whereas the US takes sanctions and military pressure as the trump card of its anti-DPRK policy, the DPRK views the line of pushing economic construction and nuclear buildup simultaneously as the revolutionary counter strategy.
The DPRK is fully ready for anything as it has lived and worked to shape its destiny under the US sanctions and pressure for decades so far.
As the US mounts the level of aggression, threat, sanctions and pressure, the DPRK has nothing but to respond to them with tougher countermeasures.
It is time to put an end to the US anti-DPRK policy which has posed serious menace to its dignity and rights to sovereignty, existence and development with cruel and vicious sanctions and pressure.
An American scholar once said what the US should recognize and feel, referring to the DPRK that grows stronger with the passage of time, is that the entity of north Korea the US has stood face to face with for decades is a special, strong bulwark beyond comparison with any force in existing communism and the US’ north Korea policy should be reexamined in view of this political entity.
He frankly admitted the failure and pessimistic future of the US. If it has any reasonable policymakers who worry about the future of their country and rationalists who can see the situation correctly, they should make a bold decision to drop the anti-DPRK hard-line policy, which was sternly judged by the past history.
The article claimed that the US policy of hostility to the DPRK will inevitably end in failure as it is oblivious of the tradition of victory on the DPRK’s side and history of defeat on the part of the US in the DPRK-US showdown and as it dreamed of the DPRK’s system collapse”, starting from ignorance of its line and policy and views sanctions and pressure as an omnipotent means without knowing the DPRK’s independent characters.
It said:
The Fatherland Liberation War, or the Korean war in the 1950s, was a fierce military clash between the two-year-old DPRK and the imperialist allied forces led by the US, which boasted of being the “strongest” in the world. However, the US suffered the most ignominious defeat in the war, which can be claimed to be a conflict between rifle and A-bomb.
The same was true with Johnson and Nixon who threatened to start a war on the pretext of the capture of the USS Pueblo and interception of large reconnaissance plane EC-121 in the 1960s, Ford who blackmailed the DPRK with the Panmunjom incident in the 1970s and Clinton, Bush and Obama, who kicked up a fuss about the DPRK’s nuclear programme in the 1990s and early 2000s. They were also branded as losers in the showdown with the DPRK like the remnants of the defeated American troops in the Korean war.
A defeat can be seen as an incident, but if it is repeated twice or thrice, it is the inevitability.
The DPRK has faced the US for many years, and the latter, in the former’s eyes, is nothing but a low-brow and primitive group, whose members are busy satisfying their instinctive and impulsive greed while bluffing in front of the weak but are petrified of the strong rival.
However hard they try, the US politicians can never deny the history and tradition of heroic Korea which emerged victorious for years and they had better keep in mind that no “miracle” would be wrought for them.
The US likes to spread the argument about the “collapse” of the DPRK’s socialist system so often.
Underlying this preposterous argument made in the hope that the DPRK would collapse of its own accord and are the extreme ignorance about and prejudice against the essence and characteristic features of the DPRK system.
As steel is tempered in fire, the DPRK’s is the most advantageous people-centred socialism which has proven its validity and truthfulness and whose features and might have grown clearer and stronger in the tempests of the times.
Single-minded unity is the political basis of the DPRK’s society and cornerstone of its existence.
The US had better refrain from talking about the “collapse” of the DPRK which is based on single-mindedness that no force on earth can break, and worry about its own gloomy future which has gone steadily downhill due to its reactionary, corrupt and backward nature.
The lines and policies desired and supported by the people never fail, but succeed and win victory—it is science. Those of the DPRK state and the Workers’ Party of Korea are the reflection of the aspirations and demand of the masses of the people and the banner of struggle which illuminates the correct ways and methods.
The hostile forces refer to the temporary economic difficulties the DPRK suffers as a “failure”, but it is nothing more than a subjective expectation and self-deception of those stupefied by the world startling miraculous achievements that occur one after another in such harsh pressure that others must have succumbed to, and the happy laughter and merry songs of the locals who pull through the unimaginable trials and difficulties by dint of the spirit of self-development. They should see this reality squarely and talk about it accordingly.
The world-recognized DPRK’s nameplate is independence.
The DPRK has held fast to political independence as the grand principle of the revolution and construction without deviating even an inch from it, and emerged victorious under its banner.
The US probably expects something similar to that of its colonial stooge, south Korea, but the DPRK has never had and will never have any “suzerain state” or “big brother”.
It is an outrageous logic of the arrogant US that it can bring any country to its knees by waving the purse of dollars and wielding the nuclear stick, and it is fully embodied in its anti-DPRK policy of hostility. But whereas the US takes sanctions and military pressure as the trump card of its anti-DPRK policy, the DPRK views the line of pushing economic construction and nuclear buildup simultaneously as the revolutionary counter strategy.
The DPRK is fully ready for anything as it has lived and worked to shape its destiny under the US sanctions and pressure for decades so far.
As the US mounts the level of aggression, threat, sanctions and pressure, the DPRK has nothing but to respond to them with tougher countermeasures.
It is time to put an end to the US anti-DPRK policy which has posed serious menace to its dignity and rights to sovereignty, existence and development with cruel and vicious sanctions and pressure.
An American scholar once said what the US should recognize and feel, referring to the DPRK that grows stronger with the passage of time, is that the entity of north Korea the US has stood face to face with for decades is a special, strong bulwark beyond comparison with any force in existing communism and the US’ north Korea policy should be reexamined in view of this political entity.
He frankly admitted the failure and pessimistic future of the US. If it has any reasonable policymakers who worry about the future of their country and rationalists who can see the situation correctly, they should make a bold decision to drop the anti-DPRK hard-line policy, which was sternly judged by the past history.
No comments:
Post a Comment