Thursday, December 27, 2007

Results of Kenyan National Elections to Close to Call

Kenyans vote in tight race

Counting has continued through the night in polling stations across Kenya, in what is seen as the country's closest-ever elections.

An election official said that turnout could reach 70%.

Voting was extended in areas where polls opened several hours late - notably in the Nairobi slum of Kibera.

President Mwai Kibaki faces his strongest challenge from his former ally, Raila Odinga, who alleged fraud before the polls opened.

An Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) spokesman told the BBC that turnout had been "massive" - maybe more than 70%.

Some say the huge numbers overwhelmed the authorities.

Correspondents say that in Kenya's previous elections, the outcome has been obvious before polling, or at least there has been a strong favourite.

When Mr Odinga first turned up to vote in Kibera, his name was missing from the electoral register - like many other people whose names began with "R" or "O".

The BBC's Karen Allen in Kibera says this will fuel suspicions of a plot to rig the election, although other say it was merely a bureaucratic mix-up.

Mr Odinga, who has led recent opinion polls, was allowed to vote later - to cheering crowds in the constituency he represents in parliament.

Milking delayed

There is tight security around the Kenyatta International Conference Centre in Nairobi, where the results will be announced.

The first presidential results are expected on Friday but parliamentary results could be known earlier.

Mr Kibaki was able to vote unhindered in the central town of Nyeri.

"I am sure we will win. Thank you Kenyans for giving me an opportunity and I will not tire serving you," he said.

People started to queue before dawn on Thursday.

"I have not even milked my cow because today we are putting our country first," said Mary Muthoni Gikiri as she waited to vote in Mr Kibaki's hometown of Othaya, some 200km (125 miles) from the capital, Nairobi.

The queue of voters stretched for more than a kilometre outside some polling stations.

In the North-Eastern Province, one old man collapsed and died while waiting to vote.

There were isolated reports of violence. A man was shot dead in Kibera - police say it was criminal, but Mr Odinga's Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) says it was political.

At least two other deaths were reported in western Kenya.

Evidence

Earlier, chief EU election monitor Alexander Graf Lambsdorff invited anyone with evidence of election fraud to come forward.

"As far as allegations of rigging are concerned, they are just that - allegations," he told the BBC.

Mr Odinga's supporters have accused the president of using state security agents to help rig the polls.

On Wednesday three police officers were killed in Kisumu, after the opposition alleged that they were carrying pre-marked ballot papers.

The president has denied involvement in any election fraud.

More than 14 million Kenyans were eligible to take part in Thursday's polls - which also included parliamentary and local elections.

President Kibaki, running under the banner of a broad-based coalition known as the Party of National Unity, hopes his economic record will secure a second term.

Mr Odinga played a key role in Mr Kibaki's 2002 victory.

But the pair fell out soon afterwards.

Mr Kibaki's critics accuse him of failing to keep his promise to tackle corruption.

There are eight candidates standing in the presidential elections.


Kenya awaits result of tight presidential race

Friday, December 28

NAIROBI (AFP) - - Polling wound up in Kenya after a presidential vote marked by relative calm and high turnout, while counting began to confirm whether Mwai Kibaki would keep his job or be unseated by opposition leader Raila Odinga.

One person was killed in western Kenya and another in a Nairobi slum but police and election observers reported few incidents despite what appeared to be a larger turnout than in the 2002 polls that brought Kibaki to power.

The 76-year-old Kibaki is seeking a second term, boasting a solid economic record and continued stability, while former political prisoner Raila Odinga, 62, aims to clinch the job.

For the first time since 1963 independence from Britain in 1963, Kenya's 14 million voters were urged to the 27,000 polling stations with no certainty of the winner's identity.

"Those polling stations that opened on time have closed and those where voting started late are going on," said Jack Tumwa, an official with the Electoral Commission of Kenya.

Hundreds of people had started lining up in the dark when the first polling stations opened at 6:00 am (0300 GMT) and queues several kilometres (miles) long quickly formed in the capital Nairobi and elsewhere.

"I slept here because I want to ensure that there is no rigging. We want to vote for change, for change," said Robert Kipkurui, an Odinga supporter in the western Rift Valley town of Eldoret.

"There is more turnout than in 2002, there are more youth and more and more people enlightened about chosing their leaders," said Teresia Kiilu, a polling station official in Nairobi's sprawling Kibera slum.

After lavish campaigns, the run-up to Kenya's fourth elections since a multi-party system was reintroduced was marred by opposition accusations that Kibaki's camp was planning to rig the ballot.

Walking out of a polling station in his Nairobi constituency, Odinga said he had not been able to vote because his name was not on the register.

"As you can see this is not by accident but by design," said Odinga, who was eventually able to vote after filing a complaint with the Electoral Commission of Kenya.

"I'm sure we are going to win, not by a narrow margin but by a landslide," he said after casting his ballot.

Kibaki, who voted near the central Kenya town of Nyeri, seemed equally confident of victory. "I am sure we will win. Thank you Kenyans for giving me an opportunity and I will not tire serving you," he said.

Kenya is considered a beacon of democracy and stability in a region plagued by conflict, but its history of electoral violence sparked fears of communal unrest after a campaign loaded with tribal rhetoric.

One man was killed by a mob and an electoral official was stabbed northwest of Nairobi, while one person was shot dead and three wounded during an incident near a polling station in the Kibera slum, police said.

But police stressed the incidents were isolated and welcomed the general order that prevailed.

"Up to now, voting has been peaceful across the country and this peace has allowed some police officers who had been initially deployed to maintain law and order to vote. This is a key development," a senior police official told AFP.

Final opinion polls released last week gave Odinga 43 to 45 percent, ahead of Kibaki's 36.7 to 43 percent. Only a survey conducted by US pollster Gallup showed Kibaki on top, with 44 percent to Odinga's 43 percent.

There are few noticeable ideological differences between the frontrunners but financial circles lean towards Kibaki, under whose tenure Kenya's economy -- the region's largest -- has expanded by an average of five percent a year.

While Odinga has cast himself as the candidate of change and the champion of the poor, Kibaki has advocated continuity despite being criticised for failing to tackle corruption and deliver constitutional reforms.

Kalonzo Musyoka, a 54-year-old born again Christian who was in Odinga's party until a few months ago, is tipped to come in third, while six other candidates are expected to record negligible scores.

Kenyans are also electing 210 members of parliament and more than 2,000 local councillors, with some observers predicting that increasingly demanding voters could oust up to 70 percent of sitting MPs.


Polls close in Kenyan election

Thu Dec 27, 4:07 PM

Kenyans went to the polls Thursday to choose a new president, as well as national and local legislators.

Observers said the main race, between President Mwai Kibaki and his former ally-turned-challenger Raila Odinga, was too close to call.

After violence left hundreds dead in the pre-election period, voting day was relatively calm.

There was one report of a death of a man suspected of bribing voters, and three police officers were stoned to death in western Kenya on Wednesday, after being accused of trying to rig the vote.

There was also little evidence of election fraud, said European Union election monitor Alexander Gaf Lambsdorff. "But we should keep in mind that the counting and the tally are still ahead."

The polls closed at 9 a.m. ET, but official results are not expected until late Thursday or early Friday.

Kibaki, 76, was elected in 2002 after the Kenya African National Union ruled for 39 years. He pledged to reduce corruption, and is credited with improving the economy.

Odinga, 62, has his power base in the Nairobi slum of Kibera. He has promised to help the poor.

There are 14 million registered voters in the country who also voted for 210 members of parliament and local councillors.

With files from the Associated Press


Raila finally votes

Published on December 27, 2007, 12:00 am
By Peter Opiyo
East African Standard Online

ODM presidential candidate Mr Raila Odinga finally voted on Thursday at 12.36pm.

Earlier in the morning, Raila and his wife, Ida, had failed to cast their votes because his name was allegedly missing from the Electoral Commission of Kenya (ECK) LangÕata constituency voter register.

Raila, who had come to the station at 9.50am, was forced to rush to ECK offices at KICC, when he learned there was a problem with the voter register.

Tension and confusion reigned at Old Kibera Primary School when it was discovered that apart from Raila, names of other voters were missing from the register.

Some voters whose surnames start with letters O, P, Q, R, A and W were affected in an incident that forced the ECK chairman, Mr Samuel Kivuitu to visit the centre.

Incidentally, bearers of names with these initials hail from communities where ODM presidential candidate enjoys a large following.

Kivuitu who came later, found himself in trouble as angry voters animatedly sought explanations over the anomaly. Police rescued him from the angry crowd.

He promised to look into the matter urgently and pledged to compensate for the voting time lost.

Raila and his wife, Ida, later voted at 12.36pm after the anomaly had been rectified.

Addressing the Press after casting his ballot, Raila said the scenario was an indication that the government wanted to rig polls.

Said he: 'This is definitely a scheme to rig polls. The Government's intention was to rig me out of Langata constituency, but it will fail.'

Earlier, ECK Commissioner Jack Tumwa had assured him that a full register would be availed to all the affected polling stations.

Tumwa attributed the mishap to splitting of registers using alphabetical order.

"No name has been deleted from the register. All names are there," Tumwa assured the Press at KICC where the ECK has set up a media centre.

But in a nine-minute interview, that also saw him address ARD-German TV journalists in German, Raila said he was disappointed by the anomaly, taking note that ECK had all the time to rectify any mistake.

Despite this, he stated that he would win with a landslide given that he enjoys countrywide support.

Raila played down the hitch saying it was unlikely to affect the polls results countrywide.

There had been earlier reports that members of President Mwai Kibaki's PNU had hatched a scheme to lock Raila out of Langata in a bid to bar him from ascending to power if ODM wins the General Election.

Raila is Kibaki's main challenger in the State House duel. Various opinion polls had put Raila ahead of Kibaki by at least four points.


Kenyans vote in close election, violence feared

Katie Nguyen,
Nairobi, Kenya
27 December 2007 01:29

Guarded by police, Kenyans voted on Thursday in a presidential election preceded by violence, tainted by allegations of rigging and likely to be the closest in more than four decades since independence from Britain.

President Mwai Kibaki (76) having unseated the East African country's 24-year ruling party in 2002, himself faces the possibility of losing power, despite a sound economic record.

Challenger Raila Odinga -- a businessman and former political prisoner under Kibaki's predecessor Daniel arap Moi -- has garnered support among members of tribes who believe the president's Kikuyu tribe have had it too good.

As dawn broke, thousands of people from the humid coast to the shantytowns and lush highlands queued at polling stations, many guarded by armed security forces.

"Kibaki is a true leader, he will win," said businesswoman Wanjiku Muteru in Kibaki's Othaya constituency, a tea-and-coffee-growing area.

"It is a shame there are loud-mouthed people spoiling his name. These selfish elements are only thinking with their stomachs," she said.

In the Lake Victoria town of Kisumu, Joseph Onyango was equally convinced that Kibaki's rival Odinga would win.

"It's now or never for Raila. Among the 42 tribes in Kenya, Raila has support in each and every one except the Kikuyus."

Odinga's Orange Democratic Movement (ODM) held a small lead over Kibaki's Party of National Unity (PNU) in polls leading up to the vote, which began at 6am (3am GMT).

Most political analysts say the outcome is too close to predict.

While some analysts say the possibility of a second transfer of power in two elections demonstrates the maturity of Kenya's democracy, others fear it heightens the prospects of trouble.

Policemen killed

Despite the formal end of campaigning, there was frantic political manoeuvring by both sides on the eve of election, with the opposition accusing the government of planning fraud.

Mobs in the western opposition heartland of Nyanza province killed at least three policemen and beat up a dozen others accused of being disguised as PNU party agents to gain access to polling stations and stuff ballot boxes.

Keen to preserve Kenya's reputation as an oasis of stability in a turbulent region, Kibaki denied the fraud allegations.

He said in a statement on Wednesday the government had no intention of rigging the voting and urged Kenya's 14-million voters to "let fair play, honesty and democracy prevail".

Although it has never suffered the all-out wars that have ravaged many of its neighbours, Kenya nevertheless has a history of election violence, and people were braced for more.

In Kenya's biggest slum, part of Odinga's Nairobi constituency, his supporters built bonfires to keep a vigil over polling stations as truckloads of military police patrolled the rubbish-strewn streets.

Kibaki supporters say his record on stability and development -- including 5% average annual economic growth -- means he deserves another five-year term.

Odinga supporters, however, say the president has betrayed Kenyans by failing to stamp out corruption.

While 62-year-old Odinga's outspokenness contrasts with Kibaki's more measured character, they differ little in policy.

Both are pledging to increase economic growth, provide free secondary education, and consolidate democratic advances.

Voting ends at 5pm (2pm GMT).

First official results are expected on Friday afternoon, but Kenyan media may give a picture overnight.

The winner will be the candidates who receives more votes than his closest challenger, plus 25 percent in five of the eight provinces.


Election view from 'forgotten Kenya'

ANDREW CAWTHORNE
Business Recorder, Pakistan

(December 28 2007)--Visitors to north-east Kenya from the capital Nairobi are sometimes asked "How's Kenya?" as if it was a foreign country. The question, offered with real curiosity not irony, shows just how isolated the mainly Muslim and nomadic people of this vast, arid region on the borders of Ethiopia and Somalia feel.

"We have been treated as outcasts, completely sidelined while they pour money into central and eastern," complains Mohamed Ali, deputy head of a school in tatty Mandera town.

With a presidential election, political parties headquartered in Nairobi are finally pledging to focus on development in North Eastern, one of Kenya's eight provinces. But with an electorate of barely 300,000 out of a total 14 million, the territory is clearly not a political priority.

Given the wilful neglect of the past, people give President Mwai Kibaki credit for some improvements, like more bore-holes for water, the most prized commodity in a drought-prone region. Most, however, say he has not done nearly enough - and seldom visited them.

That view, plus resentment over harassment of Muslims in anti-terrorism sweeps, means the province is expected to go for the opposition, which has led Kibaki in polls here. "They don't believe they are part of Kenya and they have good reason to think that," opposition leader Raila Odinga says, though whether he would deliver or not to an area far away from his tribal base is a matter of conjecture.

Their geographical isolation heightened by the total absence of decent roads, the northerners' ethnicity also unites them with tribes across the nearby borders rather than the rest of Swahili-speaking Kenya.

Both British colonialists and successive Kenyan governments have neglected development in the northern territories, leaving them bottom of most social indicators.

Amid a welter of statistics, many jump out. The ratio of qualified doctors to patients, for example, is 1 to 120,000 in North Eastern, compared to 1 to 20,000 in the far more populated Central Province, according to UN figures. Also, 93 percent of women here have no education at all, compared to 3 percent in central, the richest area.

"The social indicators are among the worst in the African continent," says Aadrian Sullivan, humanitarian adviser on Kenya and Somalia for the European Commission's humanitarian aid department ECHO, reeling off shocking malnutrition figures.

"Yet this is a country where people pour in for beach and safari holidays," adds the humanitarian expert for ECHO, a major aid donor to the region, with 16 million euros in 2006.

Northerners complain bitterly that the only proper attention they have had from central government was when soldiers poured into the region after Kenya's independence in 1963 to suppress a pro-Somali secessionist movement. Lasting four years, the "Shifta war", named after the local word for bandit, had far-reaching consequences, with the government keeping the region under a security blanket throughout the 1970s and 1980s.

"They shot dead many people and injured many under torture. They also killed many animals," said 68-year-old Yasin Abdi, recalling the war from his two-room dwelling in Isiolo town. Going back further, British authorities had also closed the unruly region - whose barren lands offered them nothing like the lush central highlands of Kenya - for long periods.

Passes were needed to get in and out. In more recent times, the region has suffered severe drought then floods, decimating livestock. A recovery of sorts is underway, but it is only a matter of time before the next drought hits, aid workers warn.

Humanitarian needs are exacerbated by the rising incidence of cross-border and inter-clan conflict, as the population squabbles over shrinking pasture lands and water access.

And war in Somalia across the border has added to the mix, disrupting trade and sending refugees into Kenya. With their traditional ways of life under greater pressure than ever, most locals are barely subsisting. At a feeding centre run by Action Against Hunger at a village outside Mandera, mother-of-seven Amina Musa Digsi brings her sick two-year-old boy in the hope of enrolling him.

Her story is typical of other women in the queue at a clearing under acacia trees - only two cows and two goats left from the 2005 drought; a sick, 70-year-old husband; and a paltry income when she's lucky enough to find and sell firewood.

A question about the election elicits bewilderment. "I will vote if I am told to vote," Digsi finally muses. Who for? "I don't know any of them. We are women, the politicians don't speak to us.

Pfizer Appeals Arrest Order for Company Officials in Nigeria

FDAnews Drug Daily Bulletin

Dec. 28, 2007
Vol. 4 No. 251

Pfizer Appeals Arrest Order for Company Officials in Nigeria

Pfizer will appeal a Nigerian judge’s arrest order for company officials who were charged with failing to appear in court in a civil and criminal case stemming from a 1996 pediatric clinical trial sponsored by the company.

The company said the arrest order issued in late December by a judge in Kano, Nigeria, “is improper and violates due process because the summonses required by law were not properly served on the defendants.” Pfizer said its local counsel is working to appeal the order, which, according to news reports, was issued by Judge Shehu Atiku for the head of Pfizer in Nigeria, Ngozi Edozien, and senior officials Lare Baale and Segun Donguro.

In May, Nigerian authorities took legal action against the company over the pediatric clinical trial of its oral antibiotic Trovan (trovafloxacin). State officials in Kano reportedly filed eight criminal charges and a civil lawsuit seeking more than $2 billion in damages and restitution.

The lawsuit, which also names eight current and former Pfizer executives, clinical investigators and the company’s local subsidiary as defendants, alleges that the parents were not informed that their children would be taking part in a clinical trial and were not informed that alternative treatments were available.

Pfizer said it “is committed to the rule of law in Nigeria and will vigorously defend itself against the untrue allegations in the government’s lawsuits.”

More Responses to the Assassination of Benazir Bhutto

What now for Pakistan?

Benazir Bhutto 1953-2007: She represented a faint hope but now even that has gone

By Peter Popham and Saeed Shah in Rawalpindi
28 December 2007

Benazir Bhutto, twice prime minister of Pakistan and the leading contender to win a third term in the coming election, has been assassinated in Rawalpindi, struck by bullets, then by shrapnel from a suicide bomb that killed at least 16 others. With her died the fragile hope that Pakistan might drag itself from the grip of the military and the jihadists and find its feet once again as a functioning democracy.

She had just finished speaking at a political rally yesterday and was waving to supporters from her car when she was targeted, first by gunshots then by a suicide bomb. Ms Bhutto was taken to hospital but died soon afterwards. "She has been martyred," Rehman Malik, a party official, announced tersely outside the Rawalpindi hospital as party supporters roared their grief, beat their breasts, smashed windows and stoned cars.

Pakistan is not new to political assassinations, a red vein of violence runs through its brief history. Yet, there was a cruel symmetry about Ms Bhutto's death coming in the same garrison town where her father was executed nearly three decades ago.

In 1979, the military dictator was General Zia ul-Haq who had Benazir's father – former prime minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto–hanged in Rawalpindi District Jail.

She was only 26 at the time and was smuggled news of his death via their lawyer. She would go on to inherit his party, his popular standing and his fate.

Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had faults and made mistakes but, like his daughter, he had enjoyed huge popular support; as prime minister he made peace with India, improved ties with China and gave Pakistan some standing and legitimacy in the world. When, on General Zia's orders, he was sentenced to death, pleas for clemency poured in from world leaders. All to no effect.

General Zia was pitiless because Pakistani politics has never left much space for tolerance and forgiveness. The same logic has now condemned Zulfikar's daughter to a terrible death.

The reverberations from her murder were felt immediately and worldwide. Condemnations and tributes of world leaders poured in and Pakistan itself braced for a violent backlash from her supporters.

As fires burned in cities across Pakistan last night, fears mounted that this huge country of 167 million, the only Muslim nation with the nuclear bomb, might begin to rip apart at the seams.

As prime minister twice before, Ms Bhutto had performed without distinction and had been hounded out of the country by her successor Nawaz Sharif with a sheaf of court cases. But no one could question her courage or her democratic credentials. Like her father, she held Pakistan's frail hopes in her hands. Like him she has been killed.

"It is not a sad day," said Nawaz Sharif, her former nemesis and main rival for power in the forthcoming election, "it is the darkest, gloomiest day in the history of this country." He blamed the government for "a serious lapse in security".

"It is the act of those who want Pakistan to disintegrate," said Farzana Raja, a senior official in her party, the Pakistan People's Party, "because she was a symbol of unity. They have finished the Bhutto family. They are the enemies of Pakistan."

President Musharraf also condemned the killing and declared three days of mourning.

Aged 54, educated at Oxford, Ms Bhutto returned to Pakistan from voluntary exile in the West with a good prospect of winning a third term in power in the election scheduled for 8 January. But, from her arrival, assassins dogged her steps. In Peshawar this week, hundreds came to hear her when thousands had been expected, fear of more bombings keeping the crowds away. Yesterday, in the garrison city that is President Musharraf's headquarters and should be the safest city in the country, the killers caught up with her.

Hope has never been a commodity in great supply in Pakistan, an artificial nation created by wrenching the majority Muslim states of British India out of India and smashing them together in a single country. Every step of its way has been punctuated by bloody death and disorder.

Benazir was the fourth Pakistani leader in 60 years to die violently. Liaqat Ali Khan, prime minister from 1948, was also killed in Rawalpindi, shot down while addressing a political meeting there in 1951, three years after coming to power. The crowd overpowered his assassin and lynched him.

Zia ul-Haq, Bhutto's executioner and Pakistan's military ruler in the 1980s, oversaw the country's Islamisation: he was the front line in the proxy war in Afghanistan, which saw billions of American dollars funnelled by Inter-Services Intelligence, Pakistan's military intelligence agency (itself staffed increasingly by the devout) to Afghan and Arab mujahedin fighting Soviet troops in Afghanistan. The Taliban and al-Qa'ida were only the most obvious fruits of his rule.

But Zia also died violently, killed in a plane crash in 1988, the probable victim – although blame has never been ascertained – of rival factions in the army.

Civilian rule was restored and Ms Bhutto was elected prime minister later the same year, aged 35. As the first democratically elected woman leader of a Muslim nation at a moment when the whole world was on the cusp of seismic political change, her victory seemed charged with significance.

But Pakistan remained fatally divided and, despite her brains and eloquence Ms Bhutto had none of her father's gift for ramming through reforms.

The hope she held out may have been a fragile one. But now even that has gone.

'I am 70, but today I feel like an orphan'

Another exhausting election rally behind her, Benazir Bhutto waved to the crowd one last time, her head and torso sticking up through the open sun roof of her white jeep. Shots rang out. She slumped back in the vehicle and fell to one side just as there was a huge explosion to her left. Blood poured from her head. She never regained consciousness.

Ms Bhutto was assassinated after making a campaign appearance in Rawalpindi, the garrison city that houses the headquarters of the Pakistan army, an institution that has always seemed opposed to her. Just a couple of miles across town, her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, Pakistan's first democratically elected prime minister, was executed in 1979 by a previous military regime.

Eyewitnesses to yesterday's massacre said that the assassin was jumped by Ms Bhutto's squad of bodyguards and promptly detonated his explosives, ripping those around him to shreds. All ambulance crews could do was gather pieces of human flesh from the blood-red street.

Farhatullah Babar, Ms Bhutto's spokesman, was travelling one car in front when the attack took place and recalled the final moments of the woman seen by the West as Pakistan's democratic darling.

"We were leaving the rally, and Ms Bhutto was in the car behind me with her security personnel and her political secretary," Mr Babar said. "Just 50 metres away from the gate, she opened the sun roof and stood up to wave to the crowds outside. Then we heard shots being fired and a blast."

Witnesses said between three and five shots were fired. At least one hit Ms Bhutto in the neck. The leader of the Pakistan People's Party and the other casualties were taken to Rawalpindi hospital, where distraught supporters massed. Pushing their way in, they wept and shouted with no doubt in their minds about who was to blame. "Musharraf is a dog," they chanted. "Musharraf murderer," they yelled. Others could only wail. "Baji Bibi", sobbed one woman. "Sister Bhutto".

Inside the operating room, the former prime minister's body lay on a stretcher, covered with a white sheet, a white bandage wrapped around the neck.

Outon the streets of Rawalpindi, victims of the bombing, their clothes blown off, lay on the road. Two were face down. All that remained of one was a severed hand. The more fortunate, with minor shrapnel wounds, wandered dazed near the Liaquat Bagh Park.

At the hospital, a frail old man reflected on the day's tragic events, tears rolling down his cheeks. "I am 70," Saqib Hussain said, "but today I feel like an orphan."

Ms Bhutto's body was being taken last night, by special flight, to the south of the country, to her home town of Larkana, where her father's body lies in a giant mausoleum.

Saeed Shah


Bhutto’s death raises spectre of instability

By Farhan Bokhari in Karachi,
Jo Johnson in London and agencies
December 27 2007 12:35

The body of Benazir Bhutto, leader of one of Pakistan’s main opposition parties, was taken to her family village for burial on Friday, a day after she was assassinated by a suicide bomber, throwing the nuclear-armed country into turmoil in the run-up to next month’s general election.

The popular but divisive politician was the first elected female leader of a Muslim state and served as Pakistan’s prime minister twice between 1988 and 1996. She sustained fatal injuries as she left an election rally in the Pakistani city of Rawalpindi.

Within hours of her death, former prime minister Nawaz Sharif said his party, the Pakistan Muslim League, would boycott the elections in honour of Ms Bhutto and demanded that Pervez Musharraf step down as the nation’s president. He also called for a nationwide strike on Friday.

Doctors at a hospital in Rawalpindi failed to revive Ms Bhutto, 54, leader of the Pakistan People’s party.

Police officer Mohammad Shahid said a suicide bomber had fired gunshots at Ms Bhutto as she was leaving a rally in her campaign vehicle before blowing himself up. Local media said she had suffered head and neck injuries.

It was reported that about 20 others died in the attack, which was followed by reports of riots around Pakistan, along with more fatalities.

Western diplomats warned that the assassination would be a setback to the Bush administration’s hopes of bringing about “a transition to democracy” in ­Pakistan.

Ms Bhutto’s return to Pakistan in October from eight years of exile was widely seen to have taken place with the support of the US administration, which was keen to promote a moderate politician who could extend a lifeline to Mr Musharraf and buttress the important US ally’s slender base of domestic political support.

“This is an extremely destabilising development for the future of Pakistan,” warned Hasan Askari Rizvi, a commentator on security affairs.

Ms Bhutto’s supporters held angry protests in several cities on Thursday night, attacking police and vehicles and starting fires. Up to 10 people were reported to have died in the violence.

Abida Hussain, a former member of parliament and a PPP leader, warned that violence would escalate.

“Conditions across Pakistan will spin out of control,” she said. “This situation will just not settle down unless president Pervez Musharraf steps down from power. Much of the anger is, in fact, directed against him.”

Officials initially reported that Ms Bhutto, who leaves behind three children, was safe after the attack, one of several attempts on her life since her return from exile on October 18.

The centre-left politician had been defiant in the face of threats, even after a suicide bomber killed almost 140 people at her homecoming parade in the southern city of Karachi.

Mr Musharraf, who came to power in a coup in 1999 against Mr Sharif, quickly condemned the attack and announced three days of mourning. “This cruelty is the work of those terrorists with whom we are fighting,” Mr Musharraf said. “I seek unity and support from the nation.

“We will not sit and rest until we get rid of these terrorists.”

Mr Sharif called the assassination a “tragedy” and blamed Mr Musharraf for the security lapse in Rawalpindi, the same town in which Ms Bhutto’s father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, was executed in 1979. “Benazir Bhutto was also my sister and I will be with you to take the revenge for her death,” Mr Sharif told grieving supporters outside the hospital in which she underwent emergency surgery.

The shock of the assassination reverberated around the world. Hamid Karzai, Afghanistan’s president, who had met Ms Bhutto hours before her murder, said he was “deeply sorry, deeply pained, [that] this brave sister of ours, brave daughter of the Muslim world is no longer with us.”

Gordon Brown called the day’s events “a tragic hour for Pakistan”. US president George W. Bush said his nation strongly condemned “this cowardly act by murderous extremists who are trying to undermine Pakistani democracy”.


Bhutto's Killing May Threaten Pakistan's Stability

by Thalif Deen

UNITED NATIONS, Dec 27 (IPS) - The assassination of Pakistan's opposition leader and former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto threatens to de-stabilise a country which the United States describes as a trusted ally and a frontline fighter in the global war on terrorism.

The attack on Bhutto in Rawalpindi Thursday was an attempt to thwart her election as prime minister of a civilian government. The polls were scheduled to take place next month.

"The military didn't really want civilian politicians in power," says Barnett Rubin, director of studies and senior fellow at the Centre on International Cooperation at New York University.

"They wanted to use them to legitimate indirect rule, and they were going to do it by rigging the election," he added.

Rubin said Washington's strategy is in "tatters" and that it will be scrambling to say the election either needs to be held as planned or postponed rather than cancelled. But Musharraf, he pointed out, is in a position to pre-empt that, "presumably by declaring a state of emergency."

Zia Mian at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs at Princeton University described the murder of Bhutto and dozens of her supporters as "a tragic event".

He said it casts "a grim shadow" over the national elections scheduled for Jan. 8, which may be postponed.

"It also raises questions about the future of President [Pervez] Musharraf, who is backed by Washington but deeply unpopular at home, and had hoped to use the elections to create legitimacy and support," Mian told IPS.

Mian pointed out that Bhutto's death also throws into question the viability of her Pakistan People's Party (PPP)--which had been founded by her father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto -- and "which she treated as a personal inheritance and vehicle for her ambition."

In an interview with IPS in October, Bhutto took a tough stand against military rule. "Under a democratic government of the PPP, the army will have to be in barracks and do its duty to defend the country's borders as its constitutional duty," she said.

"We are not looking at the army sharing power with the civil and political authority. The army must remain subservient to the civil authority," she insisted.

Anticipating political chaos in Pakistan, the 15-member U.N. Security Council met Thursday to urge all Pakistanis "to exercise restraint and maintain stability in the country."

In a presidential statement, the Council also "condemned in the strongest terms the terrorist suicide attack by extremists."

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said that Bhutto's assassination "represents an assault on stability in Pakistan and its democratic processes."

"I strongly condemn this heinous crime and call for the perpetrators to be brought to justice as soon as possible," Ban added.

Daniel Markey, a senior fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR), a U.S.-based think-tank, says that although he thought it highly unlikely that Musharraf was behind the killing, many people in Pakistan are holding him accountable.

Markey -- whose work concentrates on India, Pakistan and South Asia -- described the assassination as a "significant blow" to the U.S., which has provided over 10 billion dollars in aid since 2002, primarily to boost Pakistan's war on terrorism.

He said the worst-case scenario, which was unlikely to happen, was that if the army proved "incapable of controlling [the street violence], it may break down."

Markey said there was a "general consensus" among the top leadership of the U.S. administration that "while Musharraf is not perfect, he is still very much of a helpful partner."

"This latest tragedy is likely to reinforce [that view]," Markey added, stressing that the administration is, "likely to stick with him until the bitter end".

In a letter to Musharraf last month, Bhutto accused Pakistan's intelligence services of "involvement" in an attempt on her life last October.

"If something happens to me," she said, "I will hold them responsible rather than militant groups like the Taliban, al Qaeda or the Pakistani Taliban."

Musharraf, a former army general who shed his military uniform only last month, was accused of running a dictatorship by silencing the opposition, muzzling the press and hijacking the judiciary.

In a television interview last month, U.S. President George W. Bush virtually went into raptures over the Pakistani President when he said that Musharraf has not crossed any legitimate boundaries to be deemed a political outcast.

"As a matter of fact, I don't think he will cross any lines. We didn't necessarily agree with his decision to impose emergency rule, and hopefully he'll get rid of the rule," he added.

Bush's support for Musharraf’s increasingly authoritarian regime also drew stinging criticism from several U.S. Congressmen.

Perhaps the sharpest reaction came from presidential aspirant Senator Joe Biden -- chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee -- whose response was laced with political sarcasm.

"What exactly would it take for the president [Bush] to conclude Musharraf has crossed the line? Suspend the constitution? Impose emergency law? Beat and jail his political opponents and human rights activists?" Biden asked.

"He's already done all that. If the president sees Musharraf as a democrat, he must be wearing the same glasses he had on when he looked in [Russian President] Vladimir Putin's soul, [and said he was "a man deeply committed to his country and the best interests of his country."]

Musharraf is holding the U.S. for ransom primarily for two reasons, according to political analysts. The Pakistani President has been considered by the Bush administration as a "loyal ally" in the U.S.-led global war against terrorism-notwithstanding his ineffectiveness in curbing terrorism in his own backyard.

Secondly, Musharraf has guaranteed the safety of his arsenal of nuclear weapons as long as he is in power. But if Musharraf is ousted, the nukes may be up for grabs.

In such an event, the U.S. has to have contingency plans to ensure the "security" of Pakistan's nuclear weapons.


The Pakistan realities behind the photogenic Benazir Bhutto

Thirty seconds from death

London Daily Mail
A reality check from Andy McCarthy…

A recent CNN poll showed that 46 percent of Pakistanis approve of Osama bin Laden. Aspirants to the American presidency should hope to score so highly in the United States. In Pakistan, though, the al-Qaeda emir easily beat out that country’s current president, Pervez Musharraf, who polled at 38 percent.

President George Bush, the face of a campaign to bring democracy — or, at least, some form of sharia-lite that might pass for democracy — to the Islamic world, registered nine percent. Nine!

If you want to know what to make of former prime minister Benazir Bhutto’s murder today in Pakistan, ponder that.

There is the Pakistan of our fantasy. The burgeoning democracy in whose vanguard are judges and lawyers and human rights activists using the “rule of law” as a cudgel to bring down a military junta. In the fantasy, Bhutto, an attractive, American-educated socialist whose prominent family made common cause with Soviets and whose tenures were rife with corruption, was somehow the second coming of James Madison.


Ron Paul: U.S. policy to blame for Bhutto killing

Ron Paul blames the assassination of Benazir Bhutto on the “interventionist” policy of the United States, and says Al Qaeda is justified in being “annoyed” at us.

Podhoretz: Bhutto killing ends primary’s 'holiday from history'


GFA Leader Says Assassination has Global Repercussions

"The assassination of Benazir Bhutto has far-reaching affects across the Indian Subcontinent and around the world," says Dr. K.P. Yohannan, president and founder of Gospel for Asia, which has more than 16,500 missionaries working in the region.

Ms. Bhutto, a Pakistan opposition leader and former prime minister, died Thursday in Rawalpindi, Pakistan, after a suicide attacker shot her twice then detonated the bomb he was carrying. Along with Bhutto, 20 spectators died in the attack.

The leader had just spoken at a political campaign rally to prepare for elections on January 8 and was inside a vehicle at the time of the shooting. She was rushed to the hospital, but despite emergency surgery she could not be saved.

This was the second assassination attempt against Bhutto. The first was in October, and the attack killed at least 136 people and wounded nearly 400.

While no one has taken responsibility for the assassination, many suspect terrorist activity. Many of Bhutto's supporters reacted to the news of her death with riots and violence, which is resulting in much unrest in the country.

"Our GFA leaders in India told me that this event is bringing a huge crisis to the Indian Subcontinent," Dr. Yohannan reported. "Local newspapers indicate that al-Qaida terrorism may now become a factor in South Asia. Regardless of its origin, the stability of the entire region is being shaken."

"Pakistan is one of the largest Muslim countries and has nuclear weapons," he said, "so this event has repercussions throughout the world."

Bhutto served as Pakistan's prime minister in 1988 and 1996. She was viewed by many as a ray of hope for the country's future. Because of the tremendous instability her assassination has caused, the Pakistani government is considering postponing the upcoming elections.

Dr. Yohannan pointed out that the Church, both in Pakistan and in other South Asian nations, is not separated from the larger society.

"This situation affects the kingdom's work," he said, "making life more difficult for everyone.

"But is it my prayer that through this terrible event, the people of Pakistan and India will realize the need for a greater reality. I ask all Christians to join with me in praying for the people of Pakistan, and that God will use this crisis to open the eyes of those who do not know Him."

"We pray for the peace of the entire region," he added.

Gospel for Asia is a mission organization involved in evangelism and church planting in Asia's unreached regions. Currently Gospel for Asia supports more than 16,500 native missionaries in 10 countries. On average, these missionaries establish approximately 10 fellowships every day among unreached villages and people groups. Gospel for Asia is also committed to training native missionaries in its 54 Bible colleges.

Source: Christian Newswire
judythpiazza@newsblaze.com

Pakistan Update: Benazir Bhutto Assassinated; Obituary; Behind the Jan. 8 Elections

Benazir Bhutto killed in attack

Pakistani former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto has been killed in a presumed suicide attack.

News of her death was confirmed by a military spokesman and members of her Pakistan People's Party (PPP).

Ms Bhutto had just addressed an election rally in Rawalpindi when gunfire and an explosion occurred.

At least 15 other people are reported killed in the attack and several more were injured. Ms Bhutto had twice been the country's prime minister.

She had been campaigning ahead of elections due in January.

Nawaz Sharif, also a former prime minister and a political rival, told the BBC her death was a tragedy for "the entire nation".

"I can't tell you what the feelings of the people of Pakistan are today," he told BBC News 24 after returning from the hospital where she was brought.

The BBC's Barbara Plett says the killing is likely to provoke an agonised response from her followers, especially from her loyal following in Sindh Province.

Ms Bhutto was key to her party, she was the focus of her party and she was a major political player amongst all those fighting for seats in the forthcoming elections, our correspondent adds.

The PPP has the largest support of any party in the country.

Analysts note that Rawalpindi, a garrison city, is seen as one of the country's most secure cities, making the attack even more embarrassing for the military authorities.

Scene of grief

The explosion occurred close to an entrance gate of the park in Rawalpindi where Ms Bhutto had been speaking.

Wasif Ali Khan, a member of the PPP who was at Rawalpindi General Hospital, said she died at 1816 (1316 GMT).

Supporters at the hospital began chanting "Dog, Musharraf, dog", referring to President Pervez Musharraf, the Associated Press (AP) reports.

Some broke the glass door at the main entrance to the emergency unit as others wept.

A man with a PPP flag tied around his head could be seen beating his chest, the agency adds.

An interior ministry spokesman, Javed Cheema, was quoted as saying by AFP that she may have been killed by pellets packed into the suicide bomber's vest.

However, AP quoted a PPP security adviser as saying she was shot in the neck and chest as she got into her vehicle, before the gunman blew himself up.

Mr Sharif said there had been a "serious lapse in security" by the government.

Earlier on Thursday, at least four people were killed ahead of an election rally he himself had been preparing to attend close to Rawalpindi.

Return from exile

The killing was condemned by the US and Russia.

-----------------------------------------------------
BENAZIR BHUTTO
Educated at Harvard and Oxford
Father led Pakistan before being executed in 1979
Spent five years in prison
Served as PM from 1988-1990 and 1993-1996
Sacked twice by president on corruption charges
Formed alliance with rival ex-PM Nawaz Sharif in 2006
Ended self-imposed exile by returning to Pakistan in October
-----------------------------------------------------------
"The attack shows that there are still those in Pakistan trying to undermine reconciliation and democratic development in Pakistan," a US state department official said.

Russia's foreign ministry condemned the attack, offered condolences to Ms Bhutto's family and said it hoped the Pakistani leadership would "manage to take necessary steps to ensure stability in the country".

France spoke of an "odious" act and said it was deeply concerned.

Ms Bhutto returned from self-imposed exile in October after years out of Pakistan where she had faced corruption charges.

Her return was the result of a power-sharing agreement with President Musharraf in which he granted an amnesty that covered the court cases she was facing.

Since her return relations with Mr Musharraf had broken down.

On the day of her return she led a motor cavalcade through the city of Karachi. It was hit by a double suicide attack that left some 130 dead.

Are you in Rawalpindi? Do you witness the blast? Send us your comments using the form below

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/7161590.stm
Published: 2007/12/27 14:57:51 GMT


Bhutto Assassinated by Suicide Attacker

Pakistan Rocked by Latest Killing

Dec. 27, 2007

Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was killed today by an assassin who shot her and then blew himself up as she was leaving a campaign rally, ABC News has confirmed.

Bhutto was among at least 20 killed in the blast. A security adviser to Bhutto's party said she was shot in the neck and chest as she got into her vehicle to leave the rally in Rawalpindi, near the capital city of Islamabad.

The gunman then blew himself up.

"At 6:16 p.m. she expired," Wasif Ali Khan, a member of Bhutto's party who was at Rawalpindi General Hospital, told The Associated Press.

At the hospital, her supporters began chanting "dog, Musharraf, dog," a reference to Pakistan's president, Pervez Musharraf.

The attack took place as Bhutto was leaving a political rally where she addressed thousands before the country's Jan. 8 parliamentary elections.

Bhutto twice served as prime minister of the Islamic nation between 1988 and 1996.

Oct. 18, she returned to Pakistan from an eight-year exile. During her triumphant arrival in Karachi, Pakistan, a suicide attacker blew himself up, killing more than 140 people. Bhutto escaped injury in that attack.

Bhutto has been the target of nine previous assassination attempts.

Information from The Associated Press contributed to this report.


Obituary: Benazir Bhutto

Benazir Bhutto followed her father into politics, and both of them died because of it - he was executed in 1979, she fell victim to an apparent suicide bomb attack.

Her two brothers also suffered violent deaths.

Like the Nehru-Gandhi family in India, the Bhuttos of Pakistan are one of the world's most famous political dynasties. Benazir's father, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, was prime minister of Pakistan in the early 1970s.

His government was one of the few in the 30 years following independence that was not run by the army.

Born in 1953 in the province of Sindh and educated at Harvard and Oxford, Ms Bhutto gained credibility from her father's high profile, even though she was a reluctant convert to politics.

She was twice prime minister of Pakistan, from 1988 to 1990, and from 1993 to 1996.

Stubbornness

On both occasions she was dismissed from office by the president for alleged corruption.

The dismissals typified her volatile political career, which was characterised by numerous peaks and troughs. At the height of her popularity - shortly after her first election - she was one of the most high-profile women leaders in the world.

Young and glamorous, she successfully portrayed herself as a refreshing contrast to the overwhelmingly male-dominated political establishment.

But after her second fall from power, her name came to be seen by some as synonymous with corruption and bad governance.

The determination and stubbornness for which Ms Bhutto was renowned was first seen after her father was imprisoned and charged with murder by Gen Zia ul-Haq in 1977, following a military coup. Two years later he was executed.

Ms Bhutto was imprisoned just before her father's death and spent most of her five-year jail term in solitary confinement. She described the conditions as extremely hard.

During stints out of prison for medical treatment, Ms Bhutto set up a Pakistan People's Party office in London, and began a campaign against General Zia.

She returned to Pakistan in 1986, attracting huge crowds to political rallies.

After Gen Zia died in an explosion on board his aircraft in 1988, she became one of the first democratically elected female prime ministers in an Islamic country.

Corruption charges

During both her stints in power, the role of Ms Bhutto's husband, Asif Zardari, proved highly controversial.

He played a prominent role in both her administrations, and has been accused by various Pakistani governments of stealing millions of dollars from state coffers - charges he denies, as did Ms Bhutto herself.

Many commentators argued that the downfall of Ms Bhutto's government was accelerated by the alleged greed of her husband.

None of about 18 corruption and criminal cases against Mr Zardari has been proved in court after 10 years. But he served at least eight years in jail.

He was freed on bail in 2004, amid accusations that the charges against him were weak and going nowhere.

Ms Bhutto also steadfastly denied all the corruption charges against her, which she said were politically motivated.

She faced corruption charges in at least five cases, all without a conviction, until amnestied in October 2007.

She was convicted in 1999 for failing to appear in court, but the Supreme Court later overturned that judgement.

Soon after the conviction, audiotapes of conversations between the judge and some top aides of then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif were discovered that showed that the judge had been under pressure to convict.

Ms Bhutto left Pakistan in 1999 to live abroad, but questions about her and her husband's wealth continued to dog her.

She appealed against a conviction in the Swiss courts for money-laundering.

During her years outside Pakistan, Ms Bhutto lived with her three children in Dubai, where she was joined by her husband after he was freed in 2004.

She was a regular visitor to Western capitals, delivering lectures at universities and think-tanks and meeting government officials.

Army mistrust

Ms Bhutto returned to Pakistan on 18 October 2007 after President Musharraf signed into law an ordinance granting her and others an amnesty from corruption charges.

Observers said the military regime saw her as a natural ally in its efforts to isolate religious forces and their surrogate militants.

She declined a government offer to let her party head the national government after the 2002 elections, in which the party received the largest number of votes.

In the months before her death, she had emerged again as a strong contender for power.

Some in Pakistan believe her secret talks with the military regime amounted to betrayal of democratic forces as these talks shored up President Musharraf's grip on the country.

Others said such talks indicated that the military might at long last be getting over its decades-old mistrust of Ms Bhutto and her party, and interpreted it as a good omen for democracy.

Western powers saw in her a popular leader with liberal leanings who could bring much needed legitimacy to Mr Musharraf's role in the "war against terror".

Unhappy family

Benazir Bhutto was the last remaining bearer of her late father's political legacy.

Her brother, Murtaza - who was once expected to play the role of party leader - fled to the then-communist Afghanistan after his father's fall.

From there, and various Middle Eastern capitals, he mounted a campaign against Pakistan's military government with a militant group called al-Zulfikar.

He won elections from exile in 1993 and became a provincial legislator, returning home soon afterwards, only to be shot dead under mysterious circumstances in 1996.

Benazir's other brother, Shahnawaz - also politically active but in less violent ways than Murtaza - was found dead in his French Riviera apartment in 1985.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/2228796.stm
Published: 2007/12/27 14:04:38 GMT


Former premier Benazir Bhutto assassinated in Pakistan

AFP - 53 minutes ago

RAWALPINDI, Pakistan (AFP) - - Pakistan opposition leader Benazir Bhutto was assassinated in a suicide attack on Thursday, just two months after the former premier returned from exile for a political comeback.

Bhutto, a two-time former prime minister, had just addressed a campaign rally for next month's parliamentary elections when a suicide bomber blew himself up outside the venue, killing her and at least 10 other people.

There were unconfirmed reports that the attacker had also opened fire on her with a weapon before the explosion.

"It may have been pellets packed into the suicide bomber's vest that hit her," interior ministry spokesman Javed Cheema told AFP.

It was the second suicide attack at a Bhutto event since she had returned from exile in October, aiming to contest the elections, and comes amid an unprecedented wave of violence in the country.

The deadliest terror attack in Pakistan's history targetted her homecoming rally just hours after her return, leaving 139 people dead.

After that attack, authorities repeatedly warned her they had information that Islamic militants were trying to kill her.

Government officials said President Pervez Musharraf had been privately told of her death.

The killing will deepen the political crisis in Pakistan, where Islamic militants have vowed to disrupt the vote and Musharraf's opponents -- including Bhutto -- accused him of planning to rig the result.

There have been more than 40 suicide attacks in Pakistan this year that have left at least 770 people dead.

Bhutto, educated at Oxford and Harvard, became the first female prime minister of a Muslim country when she took the helm in Pakistan in 1988. Her father, also a Pakistani prime minister, was hanged by the military in 1979 after being ousted from power.

Recalling how she stood at his grave, Bhutto once wrote: "At that moment I pledged to myself that I would not rest until democracy had returned to Pakistan."

She had repeatedly accused President Musharraf of being dictator and had been campaigning with fierce criticisms of what she said was his autocratic rule, vowing her Pakistan People's Party would deliver democracy.

Her killing was immediately condemned by the United States, which counts Pakistan as a pivotal ally in the US-led "war on terror".

Deputy State Department spokesman Tom Casey could not confirm that Bhutto had been killed in the bombing.

But he said: "We obviously condemn the attack that shows that there are people out there who are trying to disrupt the building of democracy in Pakistan."

A shaken Nawaz Sharif, Bhutto's main rival in the January 8 election, said he shared the grief of the entire nation and promised to take up her fight.

"I assure you that I will fight your war from now on," he told Bhutto's supporters, who were crying and wailing outside the hospital in the city of Rawalpindi.


Al-Qaeda plays dealbreaker in Pakistan

By Syed Saleem Shahzad
Asia Times

KARACHI - The extraordinary "escape" from police custody of Rashid Rauf, a British subject of Pakistani origin, points to a deal between the authorities in Islamabad and militants in an effort to ensure smooth national elections on January 8, but al-Qaeda remains a threat to this seemingly inventive initiative.

Police reported on Monday that Rauf, 26, had disappeared a day earlier while returning from court to Adiala jail, a high-security prison in the garrison city of Rawalpindi, near Islamabad. He is said to have asked his two police guards for time to say afternoon prayers at a mosque. He went in handcuffed, and never came out.

Rauf was raised in Britain and returned to Pakistan in 2002, where he married and settled. He was arrested by Pakistani authorities in August 2006 in connection with a plot to use liquid explosives to blow up aircraft flying from Britain to the United States. This led to scores of arrests in Britain - the suspects are still to be charged - and prompted a major security alert at airports worldwide. Stiff restrictions on passengers' carry-on items also resulted.

But Rauf was cleared in Pakistan of terrorism charges last December and only faced charges relating to possessing chemicals that could be used in making explosives and with carrying forged travel documents.

These charges were dropped, but Rauf remained in custody over an extradition request from Britain in connection with the killing of his maternal uncle, Mohammed Saeed, who was stabbed to death in Birmingham in April 2002.

Pakistani Interior Minister Hamid Nawaz is reported to have told British Ambassador Robert Brinkely that Rauf's recapture is a "priority". It could be, though, that his release was more of a priority.

Islamabad, with Washington's support, is determined to stage credible elections next month to usher in a pro-West liberal democratic administration. President Pervez Musharraf has shed his military uniform after eight years of presidency, which has gone some way to improving the country's military dictatorship image, and the main political parties have gone back on their threats to boycott the polls.

This leaves the Pakistani Taliban militants, whose base is in the tribal areas of the country on the border with Afghanistan and who are calling for a boycott of the elections. This area, which includes North and South Waziristan and is for all intents and purposes beyond the writ of the federal government, has been proclaimed by the militants to be Islamic emirates.

The top leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, has vowed to struggle for the enforcement of Islamic law, to wage a "defensive" jihad against Pakistan, and to support the war against occupying troops in Afghanistan.

And importantly, he called for a boycott of the elections, a move that could seriously disrupt voting and undermine the credibility of the polls. Fearful of this, the authorities have tried to build bridges with the Taliban - once again - and recently bowed to their demands that scores of militants be released and that the security forces curtail their operations against militants in the tribal areas.

As a result, Baitullah reversed his demand for an election boycott. Contacts familiar with security issues who spoke to Asia Times Online are convinced that Rauf's "escape" can be seen in the context of this reversal.

The contacts point out that while Rauf might have been cleared in Pakistan of terrorist charges, he is potentially a high-value prisoner and should have been guarded by a much bigger security detail, including personnel from at least three intelligence agencies, beside the police.

It was Baitullah who announced in October that he would have former premier Benazir Bhutto killed on her return from exile. Baitullah subsequently backtracked and issued a denial of his statement after negotiating with the authorities. Nevertheless, al-Qaeda launched its own attack on Bhutto's convoy after her arrival in Karachi, with suicide bombers killing 136 people and injuring at least 450. Bhutto was unhurt.

In the same same vein, the real instigator behind the establishment of Islamic emirates in the border areas is al-Qaeda, and it will not sit idly by as the Pakistani Taliban strike deals with the establishment.

Al-Qaeda has learned from Iraq, where Baghdad made deals with Sunni militants at al-Qaeda's expense, that any peace initiatives are not in its best interests.

It is no coincidence, then, that since Baitullah's agreement not to call for an election boycott, there have been three major suicide attacks on the armed forces. In the latest incident, on Monday at least nine soldiers were killed and four wounded in an attack in the garrison city of Kohat in North-West Frontier Province. The attack is also the third since Musharraf lifted the state of emergency at the weekend, saying that "militant violence has been stopped".

The result is that the armed forces will be forced to remain proactive over the coming weeks. This is doubly troubling for them. Firstly, their efforts will be hampered as North Atlantic Treaty Organization forces across the border traditionally scale down their activities at this time. This will allow militants to easily seek haven in Afghanistan.

Secondly, as per the understanding with Baitullah, the military is meant to be backing off. The last thing Islamabad wants in the runup to the elections is highly unpopular operations in the tribal areas.

But from al-Qaeda's perspective, continued military operations are essential to keep this "war on terror" theater open and undermine any Iraq-like concessions to local militants so as to isolate al-Qaeda.

In al-Qaeda's favor, Pakistan has tried this solution many times, but it has always come to nothing. Unlike in Iraq, al-Qaeda's roots run deep in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Hundreds of Pakistani jihadis were trained in al-Qaeda's camps in Afghanistan before September 11, 2001, and al-Qaeda members have a decades-old understanding with veteran Afghan Taliban commanders.

Al-Qaeda relocated to the Waziristans after the fall of the Taliban in 2001 and immediately focused on the ideological grooming of local youths, besides introducing training programs. In the past few years, scattered Pakistani jihadis have been reorganized in al-Qaeda's camps in the Waziristans. This has led to the emergence of the neo-Taliban, a far different group from the traditional Taliban who took over Afghanistan in 1996. The neo-Taliban are strongly behind al-Qaeda and will not allow its isolation.

Al-Qaeda will continue to nurture the neo-Taliban, and the establishment of the Islamic emirates, announced by Baitullah but prompted by al-Qaeda, is an effective buffer against any Washington-backed bids to initiate peace dialogue with Taliban commanders.

Thus, the release of militants and the contrived release of Rauf hardly matter in the bigger picture of al-Qaeda's do-or-die battle in Pakistan's tribal areas and beyond.

Syed Saleem Shahzad is Asia Times Online's Pakistan Bureau Chief. He can be reached at saleem_shahzad2002@yahoo.com

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

French Aid Workers Sentenced to Hard Labour in Chad

French aid workers get hard labour

The workers blame local intermediaries for misleading them over the identity of the children

A court in Chad has sentenced six French aid workers to eight years of forced labour after finding them guilty of trying to kidnap 103 children from the African country.

The court in the capital, N'Djamena, handed down its sentence on the fourth day of the trial of the members of the French humanitarian group Zoe's Ark.

A Chadian and a Sudanese also on trial were given four years in prison and two other Chadians were acquitted on Wednesday.

The six were arrested in October for trying to fly the children, aged one to 10, to Europe.

The defendants denied the charges, saying they were on a humanitarian mission to fly sick and destitute orphans from Sudan's Darfur region for fostering with European families.

They said international law justified the operation.

Eric Breteau, Zoe's Ark's leader, told the court: "I maintain what I've said since the start of this affair ... our intention was to fetch orphans from Darfur."

"Feel the abyss"

Defence lawyers had accused the Chadian court of rushing the trial under political pressure from the French government. They also said their clients were depressed.

"They feel the abyss just a few centimetres away, they are lost, completely lost," they said.

Chad's government maintains that Zoe's Ark had been given no authorisation to take the infants out of the country.

Prosecutors said the group, led by Breteau and Emilie Lelouch, duped parents in eastern Chad into handing over their children with promises of schooling.

State lawyer Philippe Houssine said the sentences requested by the prosecution were justified because Breteau and Lelouch had shown no remorse.

Houssine told reporters: "On the contrary, he [Breteau] displays an arrogant, insolent attitude, which means this is a person who is ready to do it again if asked."

The prosecutor requested that damages be awarded for each of the 103 children in the case $9m in all.

Paris reaction

France, while calling the verdict a "sovereign decision", said it would ask Chad to implement a 1976 bilateral judicial accord to allow the convicts to be transferred to serve jail sentences in their own country.

Pascale Andreani, a spokesperson for the French foreign ministry, said in Paris: "France, after obtaining the agreement of the members of Zoe's Ark, and examining the implementation of the judicial co-operation accord between France and Chad, in particular article 29, will ask the Chadian authorities for the transfer of the prisoners to France."

Gilbert Collard, a defence lawyer, criticised the sentence, saying there was no justice in Chad.

"I hope the French government will move to quickly bring home our compatriots, who have been caught in a trap," he said.

Marian Coulibaly Indiaye, head of Unicef in Chad, refused to comment on the verdict, saying her organisation's job was to serve the best interests of the chidren.

Indiaye told Al Jazeera that the children had not been reunited with their relatives yet, pending a green light from the concerned Chadian authorities.

'Diplomatic deal'

It is widely expected that a deal between Paris and N'Djamena could soon return the aid workers.

France is an ally of Idriss Deby, the Chadian president, and has a military contingent stationed in the landlocked former French colony.

French troops have been supporting Deby's forces against opposition forces in the east and will provide the bulk of a European Union peacekeeping force due to be deployed there in January.

Janine Lelouch, mother of Emilie Lelouch, told France's LCI television: "I think we have to hope that they're transferred quickly to France because they can't stand it much longer."

The French have blamed their local intermediaries for misleading them over the identity of the children, who Chadian and UN officials said were mostly not orphans and came from villages in Chad on its eastern border with Darfur.

John Horse and the Black Seminole Warriors: Celebrating a Victory for Freedom

Celebrating A Victory for Freedom

Written by William Loren Katz
Monday, 17 December 2007
By William Loren Katz

This Christmas Eve, the freedom-loving Bush administration had a chance to mark the anniversary of a great victory for formerly oppressed people on U.S. soil. The President is unlikely, however, to notice or heed the meaning of this particular milestone, whose cast of characters and historical lessons he would undoubtedly regard as all wrong.

December 24th, 1837 marks the 170th anniversary of the U.S. government's first significant military defeat in its first foreign incursion. The place was Florida, then a Spanish colony. The foe was a united force of Africans, on the run from the south's slave plantations, and Seminoles, whose self-determination was endangered.

The runaway Africans had been establishing prosperous, self-governing communities in the peninsula since 1738. During the American Revolution they merged with Seminole Indians into a multicultural nation that cultivated crops according to techniques learned in Senegambia and Sierra Leone. Out of this came an alliance that shaped effective diplomatic and military responses to invaders and slave catchers.

By the early 19th century, U.S. slaveholding classes saw these groups as a clear and present threat to their system of wealth production through chattel slavery. Hoping to plug the leak, they began invading Florida during the administration of President James Madison, father of the U.S. Constitution and Virginia slaveholder.

Then in 1811, Madison authorized covert U.S. military operations to assist the posses, and in 1816 General Andrew Jackson invaded, seeking annexation. A leader in that invasion, Army Lt. Colonel Duncan Clinch, reported: "The American negroes had principally settled along the Appalachicola River and a number of them had left their fields and gone over to the Seminoles on hearing of our approach. Their corn fields extended nearly fifty miles up the river and their numbers were daily increasing."

Spain, whose claim to Florida rested on a visit by Ponce De Leon and imperial hubris, gave in to U.S. persuasion and agreed to sell the colony. But this led to a protracted U.S. occupation known as the “Three Seminoles Wars." In 1837, the well-informed Major General Sidney Thomas Jesup found that Africans had become resistance leaders.

He stated: "Throughout my operations I have found the negroes the most active and determined warriors; and during conferences with the Indian chiefs I ascertained they exercised an almost controlling influence over them."

Citing the dangers presented by the two peoples from different continents having forged a single nation, he said, "The two races, the negro and the Indian, are rapidly approximating; they are identical in interests and feelings . . . . Should the Indians remain in this territory the negroes among them will form a rallying point for runaway negroes from the adjacent states; and if they remove, the fastness of the country will be immediately occupied by negroes."

Although U.S. forces destroyed crops, cattle and horses, violated agreements, and seized women and children as hostages, the multicultural Seminoles, as they protected their families and homes, ran circles around the technologically and numerically superior invaders. U.S. tactics aimed at racially dividing the Africans and Seminoles also failed. "The negroes rule the Indians,” Jesup observed, and to seek peace, “it is important that they should feel themselves secure." But peace lay two decades in the future.

The day before Christmas in 1837, U.S. Colonel Zachary Taylor marched 1,000 troops in pursuit of about 400 Seminoles. Commander Wild Cat and his sub-chief, the African Seminole known as John Horse, positioned their black and red marksmen in trees and tall grass in the northeast corner of Florida's Lake Okeechobee. As Taylor's 180 Missouri riflemen, 800 soldiers from the U.S. Sixth, Fourth, and First Infantry Regiments and 70 Delaware scouts approached, the wary Delawares hesitated, then fled. Next, the Missourians broke and ran. Taylor then ordered his regular Army forward, reporting later that pinpoint Seminole rifle fire had brought down "every officer, with one exception, as well as most of the non-commissioned officers" and left "but four . . . untouched."

On Christmas morning Taylor found the Seminoles had fled in canoes. He counted 26 U.S. dead and 112 wounded, found less than half a dozen slain Seminoles and took no prisoners. This Second Seminole War alone (1835-1842) would involve U.S. Naval and Marine units, at times half of the Army, cost 1500 military deaths and taxpayers $30,000,000.

Once his decimated army limped back to Fort Gardner, Zachary Taylor won promotion by claiming, "the Indians were driven in every direction." Later, his self-promotion as an "Indian fighter," won Taylor election as the 12th President of the United States.

Lake Okeechobee was the Army's worst defeat in Florida. But the truth of that battle and the war remain buried or distorted. For example, Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. in The Almanac of American History, wrote: "Fighting in the Second Seminole War, General Zachary Taylor defeats a group of Seminoles at Okeechobee Swamp, Florida." Well, not exactly.

The Seminoles' sustained and heroic resistance to the new American Republic's first foreign invasion created one of liberty's proudest moments. Those who cherish freedom-fighters should know their story. And how about those in power who have a penchant for waging "preemptive" wars?
____________________________________________________
Copyright William Loren Katz. He is the author of BLACK INDIANS: A HIDDEN HERITAGE [Atheneum Publishers] from which this article is adapted. His website is: http://www.williamlkatz.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Chad Update: French Go On Trial for Child Kidnapping; UN To Establish Fund For Displaced

French on trial for Chad 'kidnap'

The case has sparked anti-French protests in Chad

Six French nationals accused of trying to kidnap 103 children have gone on trial in the Chad capital, N'Djamena.

The staff from the Zoe's Ark charity held hands as they arrived at court. They say the children were orphans from Darfur who were being taken to France.

Their leader testified the operation had the support of the French and Chadian governments and the UN.

The six, who have gone on hunger strike, could face 20-year hard labour terms if found guilty.

The French government has appealed for leniency.

The court will try to establish whether the children were the beneficiaries of a humanitarian project that went wrong, or the victims of child-trafficking.

'Truth'

The BBC's John James in N'Djamena says the leader of the six, Eric Breteau, looked gaunt but composed in court.

"I dispute the charges I am accused of. I intend to respond point by point," he told the packed courtroom.

Tight security as trial starts

"Nobody ever expressed even the tiniest doubt about the Sudanese origins of the children present at our bases," Mr Breteau told the court, apparently in response to accusations that the children were not really from Darfur.

He said the operation had been kept secret from local authorities in Chad "in order not to put the mission in danger ... and so as not to alert the suspicions of the Sudanese secret service," Mr Breteau said, quoted by the AFP news agency.

"Before the operation was launched... all the French authorities were informed in writing of our action," he added.

The governments of France and Chad have denied any knowledge of the operation.

The accused chatted to each other during breaks in proceedings but otherwise followed closely.

The court was surrounded by anti-riot police, armed with machine-guns.

The courtroom was packed, included many journalists from the French media. Outside, there was a crowd of about 100 people.

The case has sparked protests in oil-producing Chad amid claims the accused might benefit from special treatment because they are Europeans.

"Our clients will tell the truth, that they came here to do good," said Mario Stasi, lawyer for the charity's nurse, Nadia Merimi.

The six were stopped by officials as they went to catch a flight from Chad to France in late October with the children.

Most of the children have been found to have at least one living parent or guardian.

'Fight to the end'

The judge will want to know why, when none of the children was injured, they were bandaged and caked in fake blood ahead of their flight.

One of the accused, Emilie Lelouche, told France Info radio on Thursday: "We're going to fight to the end."

The aid workers have been on a hunger strike since earlier this month, refusing food but drinking water, and have accused the French government of deserting them.

On Thursday, French Junior Foreign Minister Rama Yade said the government had appealed to Chad to treat the accused with a "certain clemency".

French Justice Minister Rachida Dati said this week that if convicted the six might be able to serve their sentences in France because of a bilateral judicial agreement.

Analysts have speculated a diplomatic deal could be struck after French President Nicolas Sarkozy met Chadian President Idriss Deby last week in Lisbon during a European and African leaders' summit.

But an unnamed Chad government official told Reuters news agency: "Have you ever seen an African sent back home after committing a crime as serious as the one [allegedly] committed by the members of Zoe's Ark?"

Three Chadians and one Sudanese refugee are also on trial for conspiracy.

In all, 17 Europeans were arrested in the eastern Chadian town of Abeche on 25 October but 11 others - three French journalists, seven Spanish flight crew and a Belgian pilot - have since been repatriated.


Chad kidnap accused 'were duped'

The case has sparked anti-French protests in Chad

One of six French aid workers charged in Chad with abducting children has told a court they were duped to believe the youngsters were Darfur war orphans.

Local intermediaries had assured the Zoe's Ark aid workers the children were from Darfur, Emilie Lelouch claimed.

But a Sudanese co-defendant criticised the French workers, saying the six had concealed plans to take the youngsters back to France.

They deny wrongdoing, and could face 20 years' hard labour if convicted.

Ms Lelouch told the second day of the trial on Saturday in Chad's capital, N'Djamena, that the operation was aimed at evacuating war orphans from the troubled Sudanese region of Darfur.

'No doubt'

"I never had any doubt whatsoever about [the children's] Sudanese origins," she was quoted as saying by Associated Press news agency.

Tight security as trial starts

Three Chadians and a Sudanese man are also charged with fraud and abduction after officials stopped a convoy on 25 October carrying 103 children that the charity were planning to fly to France.

Investigators found out most of the children were Chadians who lived with at least one parent or close relative.

The families have told police that they were not told their children were about to be taken abroad.

They have claimed that the aid workers misled them into believing the youngsters would be offered temporary local school places.

'Tricked'

Ms Lelouch and another Zoe's Ark member, Nadia Merimi Aubry, denied this.

But the families' account has been confirmed by a journalist who accompanied the aid workers.

The claims by the charity's staff were also contradicted by fellow accused, Souleimane Ibrahim Adam, who denies helping kidnap 63 of the children.

He told the court: "[The aid workers] tricked me. They told me [the children] were going to remain. Had I known it was to take the children elsewhere, I wouldn't have agreed."

More than a week ago, the aid workers began a hunger strike in protest at their treatment.

The case has sparked protests in the oil-producing former French colony amid claims the charity workers might benefit from special treatment because they are Europeans.

Analysts have speculated a diplomatic deal could be struck to allow the French to return home after the verdict.


Should the New International Force Be 'Neutral' Or 'Impartial'?

UN Integrated Regional Information Networks
NEWS
24 December 2007
Ndjamena

A new European Union force and UN mission set to deploy in Chad are mandated to protect aid groups assisting hundreds of thousands of people, amid violence by armed bandits, militias, rebels, soldiers and some foreign fighters. But humanitarian officials in Chad are concerned that if the mission does not remain distinct and separate from relief efforts it risks undermining them.

"Understanding the distinction between the terms 'neutrality' and 'impartiality' is particularly crucial in this type of conflict," the head of the International Committee for the Red Cross in Chad, Thomas Merkelbach, told IRIN. Aid officials are airing their concerns in meetings with military advance teams.

Merkelbach said he was struck by how some of the officials he talked with in the European Union force (EUFOR) and the UN mission for the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT) did not seem to appreciate the difference.

"I keep hearing officials using the terms interchangeably," Merkelbach said, adding that the success or failure of the mission could hinge on officials' ability to discern between the two and act accordingly.

Neutrality is above all a political concept, he said. As stated in the Red Cross movement statutes neutrality is "to endeavour not take sides in hostilities or engage at any time in controversies of a political, racial, religious or ideological nature."

Impartiality, on the other hand, refers to the delivery of humanitarian assistance. Its aim, according to the Red Cross statutes, is "to relieve the suffering of individuals, being guided solely by their needs, and to give priority to the most urgent cases of distress."

The mandate of the international military force coming to Chad is not to 'relieve suffering' but to provide protection to humanitarian aid groups so that they can provide the relief more effectively.

Yet Merkelbach and many humanitarian officials IRIN spoke with in Chad said they are concerned that key officials do not understand why it is important to make the distinction.

Neutrality

"Our fear is that we will be associated with EUFOR," the country head of International Rescue Committee (IRC) Jef Imans told IRIN.

"If some armed groups do not perceive the international force as neutral and those armed groups associate the international force with international humanitarian operations then we may become targets," he said.

There are reasons armed groups may not perceive EUFOR as neutral. The UN resolution gives it the right to use force in some circumstances, in accordance with Chapter VII of the UN charter. (MINURCAT is a police training and monitoring mission and does not include armed troops.) But more importantly, many of the more than 3,500 troops expected to make up EUFOR will be transferred from a contingent of French troops already based in the former French colony.

The French army told IRIN that it is providing support to the Chadian army "indirectly". Various rebel groups have also declared war on France.

If EUFOR were to engage rebels it too would be likely to be perceived as pro-government, the programme coordinator of the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs Philippe Verstraeten told IRIN. "And if the rebels then associate EUFOR with the international humanitarians in eastern Chad then it could much become harder and more dangerous for us to operate".

Humanitarians fear that they will no longer be accepted by the very people they seek to help, ICRC communications coordinator in Chad Inah Kaloga told IRIN.

That risk - of EUFOR being viewed as neither neutral nor impartial - is why aid workers say it is particularly important that EUFOR refrain from mixing security operations with humanitarian relief.

"That is why we are so insistent on this distinction between what the international military forces do and what we humanitarians do," Kaloga said.

Several aid officials said that the international military officials they have talked with in Chad have not always understood why. The international military forces often have better logistical support by which to provide water and food to civilians, the IRC representative said. "They may also be eager to do it to win hearts and minds of locals so they are not perceived as enemies."

Military impartiality

EUFOR made it clear to IRIN that it has no intention of blurring the lines between their security operations and the assistance being given by aid groups.

"We might need to have an airstrip or bridge built for logistical reasons which humanitarians may also end up using," EUFOR's head of public information Lieutenant-Colonel Patrick Poulain told IRIN. "But our mandate is to provide security and if we succeed at that then that's all the hearts and minds we need to get the population on our side."

Still there may be times when the international military are compelled to provide humanitarian assistance, ICRC's Kaloga said. "Imagine if a EUFOR military patrol comes across civilians and combatants who have been wounded on the battlefield and who urgently need medical attention," she said.

In moments like that the international force should be compelled to undertake humanitarian action, Kaloga said. "It must act to 'relieve the suffering' of the injured and do so impartially no matter from what side the injured come from," she said.

The larger problem Kaloga points to is that there is always a political dimension to a military mission. "The mission may be led into debate which requires political choices," she said. "This could make the mission neither neutral nor impartial and we humanitarian groups run the risk of also being politicised if we are too closely associated."

Neither 'neutrality' nor 'impartiality' is mentioned in UN Security Council and EU Parliament resolution authorising EUFOR while for ICRC neutrality and impartiality are central to its mandate. "For us they are not just abstract ideas," Kaloga said, "They are active principles that we apply as a means to an end."

This report does not necessarily reflect the views of the Pan-African News Wire


UN Fund Set Up to Help Protect Refugees in Chad, Central African Republic

UN News Service (New York)
NEWS
24 December 2007

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon has set up a trust fund to help the Governments of Chad and Central African Republic (CAR) build the law and order capacity needed to ensure the security of hundreds of thousands of refugees and internally displaced persons (IDPs) endangered by the spill over of violence from Sudan's war-torn Darfur region.

The Fund, supporting the UN Mission in the Central African Republic and Chad (MINURCAT), has already received $2.2 million from the Government of Japan, $1 million from the Government of Norway and -250,000 from the Government of Belgium, Mr. Ban's spokesperson announced today in a statement.

Discussions are advanced with the European Commission for a contribution of -10 million.

"The Secretary-General appreciates these generous donations and would like to use this opportunity to invite all interested donors to support MINURCAT's mandate through a contribution to the United Nations Trust Fund," the statement said.

MINURCAT, for which the UN General Assembly has already authorized $182 million, was set up by the Security Council in September as a multidimensional presence including European Union military forces and comprising 300 police and 50 military liaison officers, as well as civilian staff, focusing on the areas of civil affairs, human rights, the rule of law and mission support.

More than 400,000 refugees and IDPs have been driven from their homes by fighting and insecurity in the two countries and neighbouring Sudan, and an estimated 700,000 others in host communities have also been affected.