Sunday, December 30, 2012

Zimbabwe President Mugabe An African Icon--Says South African Television Host

President Mugabe an African icon — Tambo

Sunday, 30 December 2012 00:00
Zimbabwe Sunday Mail

Top South African television presenter Dali Tambo has described President Mugabe as a true African icon whose legacy should be upheld throughout the continent.

Tambo is the son of the late African National Congress stalwart Cde Oliver Tambo and is highly respected across the continent.

Speaking after filming a documentary of Cde Mugabe for his weekly talk show, People of the South, at State House last week, Tambo said the President “is a person of substance” whose appeal is unique and overarching.

He said the Head of State and Government and Commander-in-Chief of the Zimbabwe Defence Forces remains iconic despite criticism from his detractors.

The documentary — capturing Cde Mugabe’s political career and personal life — will be aired on South African television channel SABC3 in January.

“No African should doubt that President Mugabe is an icon. He is a good example of an undeniable icon of Africa,” he said.

Tambo said President Mugabe bore a distinct sense of national identity throughout the interview, which is expected to evoke African pride among viewers.

“The aim of People of the South is to interview people of substance who have a unique and overarching appeal to viewers. President Mugabe fits this bill in every sense because his presence creates a strong sense of national identity and evokes a sense of pride in viewers,” said Tambo, who expressed his gratitude for being afforded the opportunity to spend time with the President.

Tambo jetted into the country on December 18. Accompanied by a 14-member crew, he filmed the documentary from December 19 to 21.

Lead cameraman Perseverance Dube said spending time with the First Family awakened him to the reality of Western propaganda against Zimbabwe.

“I am surprised by how down-to-earth and friendly the First Family is, considering all the bad publicity the Western media makes out of these good people,” he said.

“We were given access to the places the President holds dear; that include his rural home, the Gushungo Farm and the new school that is about to open. I am in awe of the good works the First Family is doing to reach out to the community.”

Dube said the President — during the interview — shares intimate details of his upbringing, his road to national leadership as well as his life as a husband and father.

“Most of the footage comprises the President telling the audience of all the facets of his life: how he was brought up, what made him start his political career, his days in jail and exile, the inspirational people in his life and the principles he upholds as a father and the President of a nation.

“These will be further illustrated visually by inter-cutting archive footage, photographs and personal memorabilia. The episode will culminate in a celebratory dinner where Dali encourages reminiscing, good humour, and a great sense of occasion.

“We also included detailed separate interviews of the First Lady and two of their children, Bona and Chatunga. We are convinced that we have come up with a riveting piece of work that will set the tone for the anticipated second season of People of the South and will grip the audience from start to finish.”

M23 Rebels Attack United Nations Helicopters In Eastern DRC

M23 rebels attack UN helicopters in eastern DRC

Sat Dec 29, 2012 3:17AM GMT
presstv.ir

The UN peacekeeping mission in the Democratic Republic of Congo says the March 23 (M23) rebels have opened fire on two of their helicopters in the east of the Central African state.

The UN mission (MONUSCO) said in a statement issued on Friday that the two helicopters were fired upon as they passed over the M23-controlled towns of Kibumba and Kanyamahoro on Wednesday night.

“This is the second time that UN helicopters have been deliberately targeted by M23 elements during the month of December 2012,” the statement said, adding that the helicopters are often used for medical evacuations.

The statement noted that any attack on MONUSCO helicopters “constitutes a war crime”.

“Those responsible for such acts will be prosecuted and brought to justice,” it said.

However, M23 spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Vianney Kazarama denied the claims about attacks on UN helicopters.

“We never attacked MONUSCO, we fired at helicopters from the FARDC (Congolese army), who were flying reconnaissance over M23 zones,” he was quoted as saying on Friday.

Peace talks between the DRC government and the M23 rebels were suspended on December 21, nearly two weeks after they began in the Ugandan capital Kampala.

Both sides, however, agreed to resume negotiations in January after the New Year holidays.

The M23 rebels defected from the Congolese army in April in protest over alleged mistreatment in the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC). They had previously been integrated into the Congolese army under a peace deal signed in 2009.

Since early May, over 900,000 people have fled their homes in the eastern Congo. Most of them have resettled in Congo, but tens of thousands have crossed into neighboring Rwanda and Uganda.

Congo has faced numerous problems over the past few decades, such as grinding poverty, crumbling infrastructure, and a war in the east of the country that has dragged on for over a decade and left over 5.5 million people dead.

Bolivia Nationalizes Two Spanish-owned Electrical Utilities

Bolivia nationalizes 2 Spanish-owned electrical utilities

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:31AM GMT
presstv.ir

Bolivia has nationalized two electrical utilities owned by Spain, following a decree by President Evo Morales.

On Saturday, the Bolivian president announced that the South American country nationalized the two utilities, which belonged to Iberdrola, Spain’s largest energy group.

Morales stated that the measure was taken in an effort to enhance rural energy services in the country.

“We considered this measure necessary to ensure equitable energy tariffs ... and to see to it that the quality of electricity service is uniform in rural as well as urban areas,” he said.

He also said Iberdrola would be compensated after a valuation is drawn up by an independent arbiter.

The two utilities, which are called Electropaz and Elfeo, are located in capital La Paz and in Oruro, 370 kilometers (230 miles) south of the capital, respectively.

Iberdrola’s office in La Paz was guarded by police forces on Saturday.

According to AFP, police seized the offices and took control of the power plants later.

An Iberdrola spokesman told Reuters that the company was investigating the situation, but he did not comment any further.

Iberdrola, which is a Spanish private multinational electric utility based in Bilbao, has operated in Bolivia since the late 1990s.

In May, a subsidiary of another Spanish power group, the Red Ectrica Corporacion, was nationalized in the country.

Egypt Allows Tons of Building Materials Into Gaza

Egypt allows tons of building materials into Gaza

Sun Dec 30, 2012 4:41AM GMT
presstv.ir

Egypt has allowed building materials into the Gaza Strip through the Rafah border crossing for the first time since Israel imposed a blockade on the Palestinian territory more than five years ago.

According to Egyptian and Palestinian officials, thousands of tons of cement, steel and other building materials started crossing into Gaza on Saturday.

A Hamas government official confirmed that a total of 20 trucks carrying materials crossed the Rafah border into Gaza.

Under the authoritarian rule of former Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak, building materials were not allowed to cross into the coastal enclave.

The Egyptians launched a revolution against the pro-Israeli regime in January 2011, which eventually ended the 30-year dictatorship of Mubarak in February 2011.

Gaza has been blockaded since June 2007, a situation that has caused a decline in the standard of living, unprecedented levels of unemployment and unrelenting poverty for Palestinians.

The apartheid regime of Israel denies about 1.7 million people in Gaza their basic rights such as freedom of movement, jobs that pay proper wages and adequate healthcare and education.

West Not Interested In Resolving Syria Crisis

West not interested in resolving Syria crisis: Iran envoy

Sun Dec 30, 2012 5:33AM GMT
presstv.ir

Iranian Ambassador to Lebanon Ghazanfar Roknabadi says Western countries are not interested in resolving the ongoing crisis in Syria.

Roknabadi also said that “The majority of Syrians want reforms to be implemented by the country’s President Bashar al-Assad.”

Damascus says that the chaos in Syria is being orchestrated from outside, and there are reports that a very large number of the militants in the country are foreign nationals.

The Iranian ambassador added that the Syrian people “inside the country” are the representatives of Syria.

Many people, including large numbers of security forces, have been killed in the turmoil that began in Syria in March 2011.

On December 16, Iran unveiled the details of a six-point plan to resolve the crisis in Syria. The plan calls for an immediate end to the violence, and urges the Syrian government and the representatives of all Syrian groups regardless of their political and social tendencies to hold talks in order to form a national reconciliation committee.

The plan also calls for the dispatch of humanitarian aid to Syrians following the end of all conflicts, the lifting of all economic sanctions imposed against the country, and the facilitation of the return of displaced Syrians to their homes.

Roknabadi said Iran’s six-point plan stresses the importance of dialogue, holding a fair election and respecting the choice of the Syrian people.

Referring to the first round of talks regarding the Syrian crisis in Tehran, Roknabadi said the next round of meetings would be held in the Syrian capital, Damascus.

The West 'Prays' Russia and China Will Continue Blocking Syria Action

The West ‘prays’ Russia and China will continue blocking Syria action

22 December, 2012, 23:53
Rt.com

The West has “no appetite” for a military intervention in Syria, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said on Saturday. At the same time, Moscow’s intelligence shows the Arab country’s chemical arsenal is “so far” secured, he revealed.

­“No one has any appetite for intervention. Behind the scenes, I have a feeling they are praying that Russia and China go on blocking intervention, as sanctioning it would mean they must act – and they are not ready,” Lavrov told journalists on a flight back to Moscow from an EU summit in Brussels.

The FM was assessing the current mood in the UN Security Council after NATO cleared the stationing of Patriot missiles in Turkey. Ankara and the alliance say this is a containment tool to prevent any further Syrian violence from spilling over the border, but political analysts believe the step might signal the West and their Middle East allies are preparing to intervene in Syria.

Chemical weapons ‘so far’ secured, but US needs to ‘decide on priorities’

Syria’s chemical arsenal remains one of the major international concerns since the topic first emerged in July. Lavrov says that President Bashar Assad’s government is doing whatever’s possible to secure the weapons.

“So far, the arsenal is under control. The Syrian authorities have gathered all the stock in one or two locations. It used to be scattered all over the country,” the FM said adding that Moscow and Washington’s intelligence agree on the matter.

Syria is reportedly in possession of nerve agents, including mustard gas, as well as the Scud missiles needed to deliver them. The country is a non-signatory to the Chemical Weapons Convention, which outlaws their production.

Since July, Assad’s government has repeatedly stated that chemical weapons will not be used on Syria, but Syrian officials have not excluded the possibility they might be deployed in the event of “a foreign attack.”

The threat has drawn international condemnation.

The EU, US and many others are also worried that Syria’s chemical weapons might fall into the hands of the Syrian rebels, some of whom have links to Al-Qaeda.

But Lavrov pointed out at some inconsistency in Washington’s approach where the chemical arsenal issues overlap with US support for the Syrian opposition.

“Our American partners admit that the main threat is rebels seizing the chemical arsenal. The opposition forces include all kinds of groups even ones the US has recently proclaimed terror groups. We tell them: ‘Guys but you support the opposition and its armed struggle. This armed struggle might result in exactly what you fear. You decide on your priorities.’ But there is no clear response to that,” said Lavrov.

‘No one will win this war’

Russia refuses to act as an intermediary trying to Assad into fleeing, Lavrov also said. At the same time Moscow is not going to accommodate the Syrian president should he step down: “Assad is not going anywhere, no matter what anyone says, be it China or Russia.”

On being asked whether the rebels will eventually oust President Assad, Lavrov replied: “Listen, no one is going to win this war.”

The situation in Syria remains volatile with new deaths reported daily by human rights groups. According to those reports, the death toll in the country which has been engulfed in the civil unrest since March 2011 has exceeded 40,000 people. The UN Human Rights Committee also says the conflict made 164,000 refugees.

Moscow insists the Syrian conflict should be resolved through direct and unconditional negotiations between the government and opposition. Russia insists the country should be given the right to self-determination and neither side should be supported.

The US, the UK, France, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and a number of other countries in the West and the Middle East, on the other hand, call on President Assad to step down immediately and grant financial and military support to the Syrian opposition forces. But despite all the support, the Syrian National Coalition which was deemed to become an umbrella for all the Syrian opposition groups still failed to unify Assad’s opponents and therefore does not have leverage on all the forces fighting the goverment’s troops on the ground.

The UN says the Syrian war is growing more sectarian than civic with each day and that there is no end in sight to the conflict.

Syria Chemical Attack Claims Aim to Justify Foreign Interference

Syria chemical attack claims aim to justify foreign interference – Moscow

27 December, 2012, 14:41
Rt.com

Accusations that forces backing Syrian President Assad allegedly used chemical weapons against the opposition is a provocation aimed at making an excuse for foreign military intervention, says the Russian Foreign Ministry.

Another goal of such reports is to stir up panic among Syrians and foreigners who remain in the country, the ministry’s spokesman Aleksandr Lukashevich told the media on Thursday.

The use of weapon of mass destruction is unacceptable, the diplomat stressed. The Syrian government repeatedly assured Russia, as well as Western partners and the UN that it would not use chemical weapons. Moscow is keeping a close watch on the situation and has no information that the Syrian government plans to use chemical arms.

“We hope that all opposition forces will assume similar obligations and strictly follow these commitments,” Lukashevich pointed out.

Earlier, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said the use of chemical weapons “would be a political suicide” for Assad regime.

“Every time we hear rumors, or pieces of information come to surface that the Syrians are doing something with the chemical weapons we double-check, we triple-check, we go directly to the government and all the time we get very firm assurances that this is not going to be used under any circumstances,” he said in an exclusive interview with RT.

Meanwhile, the Syrian opposition claims the government troops did use chemical warfare in an attack on the city of Homs on Sunday, killing seven people and injuring dozens more with poison gas. A number of videos were posted online showing, opposition activists claim, victims of the alleged chemical attack.

Syria's Ambassador to Moscow Riyad Haddad denied the report saying that the information “was absolutely wrong.”

"Naturally, it was a provocation and a part of plans to put psychological pressure on the government in Syria," he told Interfax. According to the diplomat, it is all done to make a pretext for a foreign intervention into the Arab Republic. He expressed hope though that thanks to Russian and Chinese efforts it will not happen.

Permanent members of the UN Security Council, Moscow and Beijing stand for a political solution to the Syrian crisis.

“The only path to put an end to the sufferings of Syrian people lies through a dialogue and talks,” Lukashevich reiterated on Thursday. On the whole, the situation in Syria is extremely complicated and “is following the most unfavorable scenario." Responsibility for continuing the bloodshed in the republic is laid with those who incite further fratricidal war in Syria, the Russian diplomat pointed out.

Russia Hopes 'Reasonable' Syrian Opposition Will Seek Dialogue

Russia hopes ‘reasonable’ Syrian opposition will seek dialogue

Published: 28 December, 2012, 13:55
Rt.com

Moscow hopes that the Syrian opposition will substantially size up the situation in the country and search for ways to begin a political dialogue with President Bashar Assad’s government, says Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

Russia pushes for a diplomatic solution to the Syrian crisis that has been going on for almost two years and urges the conflicting sides to get to the negotiating table.

Moscow representatives have already had contacts with the National Coalition for Syrian Revolutionary and Opposition Forces which was formed in November in Qatar, Lavrov said on Friday. Now Russian diplomats are ready to meet for talks with the leader of the group – Ahmed Moaz al-Khatib. The National Coalition does not object to talks either, he added.

According to Lavrov, Moscow was “certainly disappointed” over the coalition’s main goal, which was proclaimed when it was created in Doha. It stands for the overthrow of the Assad regime and “the dismantling of all the institutions of power.”

Russia’s main concern is that such a scenario would only lead to non-stop violence in the Arab republic. The only solution is to reach a mutually-acceptable compromise between the rivalry parties.

In July, President Vladimir Putin said that in the case if the Syrian authorities are displaced, “they will simply swap places with the current opposition and this will cause a civil war that would go on for no one knows how long.”

Moscow has also repeatedly stressed that it is up to Syrians to decide the future of their country as well as the fate of President Assad.

Speaking on Friday, Lavrov underlined that the international community should not incite the sides of the conflict to continue bloodshed. On the contrary, they should urge all the Syrian political, religious and ethnic groups to find ways to come to an agreement on what future they want for their country, the Russian Foreign Minister told the media after a meeting with his Egyptian counterpart Mohamed Amr in Moscow.

Russia appreciates the efforts of Egypt – which hosts the Syrian Coalition’s main headquarters – in trying to convince the opposition to agree for a political dialogue, Lavrov added.

United Nations Envoy to Syria Holds Discussions With Russian Foreign Minister in Moscow

December 29, 2012

Insisting on Assad’s Exit Will Cost More Lives, Russian Says

By ELLEN BARRY
New York Times

MOSCOW — Russia’s foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov, said Saturday that there was “no possibility” of persuading President Bashar al-Assad to leave Syria, leaving little hope for a breakthrough in the standoff. He also said that the opposition leaders’ insistence on Mr. Assad’s departure as a precondition for peace talks would come at the cost of “more and more lives of Syrian citizens” in a conflict that has already killed tens of thousands.

Moscow has made a muscular push for a political solution in recent days, sending signals that the Kremlin, one of Mr. Assad’s most important allies, sees a pressing need for political change. As an international consensus forms around the notion of a transitional government, it has been snagged on the thorny question of what role, if any, Mr. Assad would occupy in it.

But after talks in Moscow on Saturday with Lakhdar Brahimi, the United Nations and Arab League envoy on Syria, Mr. Lavrov said that Russia could not press Mr. Assad to give up power. Mr. Lavrov has said that Russia “isn’t in the business of regime change,” but his characterization of Mr. Assad’s stance on Saturday sounded more definitive.

“He has repeatedly said, both publicly and privately, including during his meeting with Lakhdar Brahimi not long ago, that he has no plans to go anywhere, that he will stay in his post until the end, that he will, as he says, protect the Syrian people, Syrian sovereignty and so forth,” Mr. Lavrov said. “There is no possibility of changing this position.”

There have been evident changes in the standoff over Syria in recent weeks, as Russia acknowledged that government forces were losing territory and distanced itself from Mr. Assad. In televised remarks, President Vladimir V. Putin said that Russian leaders “are not preoccupied by the fate of Assad’s regime” and that after 40 years of rule by one family, “undoubtedly there is a call for change.”

But Moscow has watched the recent Arab uprisings with mounting worry, arguing that the West was unleashing dangerous turbulence by supporting popular rebellions, and it has vehemently opposed any international intervention in Syria as a matter of principle.

Developments on the battlefield have accelerated the pace of diplomacy.

Anti-Assad activists on Saturday reported fierce fighting and large numbers of casualties in the central city of Homs, where they said government troops were completely surrounding the Deir Ba’alba neighborhood after storming the area on Friday. An activist reached by telephone, who said he was less than a mile from the neighborhood on Saturday night, said he heard gunfire and saw houses in flames. Communications to the area had been cut, and civilians and rebel fighters who had managed to flee were “traumatized,” he said.

Mr. Brahimi, an Algerian statesman who is viewed sympathetically in Moscow, recommended last week that a transitional government be established, perhaps within months, and that it should rule Syria until elections could be held.

Like Russia, Mr. Brahimi hopes to arrange a political settlement on the basis of an international agreement reached this summer in Geneva, which envisages a transitional government and a peacekeeping force. But the Geneva document does not address Mr. Assad’s fate, nor does it invoke tough sanctions against the Syrian government under Chapter VII of the United Nations Charter, which authorizes economic measures and, if necessary, military action.

On Saturday, Mr. Brahimi said that it might be necessary to “make some small changes to the Geneva agreement.”

“Nonetheless,” he added, “I consider that it is a wonderful basis for the continuation of the political process.” He warned that if a political solution was not possible, Syria would be overrun by violence, like Somalia. He also said his recent visit to Damascus had convinced him that continued fighting in the country could turn into “something horrible,” and he envisioned the flight of a million people across Syria’s borders into Jordan and Lebanon.

“The problem could grow to such proportions that it could have a substantial effect on our future, and we cannot ignore this,” Mr. Brahimi said.

Russia has set the stage for forward momentum, announcing a gathering in mid-January between the United States, Russia and Mr. Brahimi to discuss Syria.

Moscow may see these talks as a chance to rebuild its prestige in the Arab world, where Russia’s historically strong alliances have been badly damaged by the standoff over Syria. Mr. Lavrov bridled on Saturday when a reporter from an Arabic news channel asked him to comment on criticism that Russia was “a participant in the Syrian conflict” because it continued to fulfill weapons contracts with Damascus after the outbreak of violence.

The accusation, Mr. Lavrov said, “is so far from the truth that there’s no way to comment on it.” He said that Russia did not supply the government with offensive weapons, and that much of Syria’s arsenal dated to the Soviet era. He also said the opposition was receiving a far more deadly flow of weapons and aid.

The leader of the main opposition coalition, Sheik Ahmad Moaz al-Khatib, responded coolly to an overture on Friday from Russia, saying Moscow should publicly apologize for its pro-government position. He also refused to meet with Russian leaders in Moscow, saying a meeting was possible only in an Arab country.

Mr. Lavrov said Saturday that he would agree to such a meeting, but he responded to Mr. Khatib’s remarks with an equally chilly response.

“I know that Mr. Khatib is probably not very experienced in politics,” he said. “If he aspires to the role of a serious politician, he will nonetheless understand that it is in his own interests to hear our analysis directly from us.”

Hwaida Saad contributed reporting from Beirut, Lebanon.

Venezuela Deports Alleged French Agent Accused in Plot to Assassinate President Chavez

Venezuela deports alleged French agent accused of plotting to kill Hugo Chavez

Published December 29, 2012
Associated Press

CARACAS, Venezuela – Venezuelan authorities said Saturday that they had deported a man they described as a French intelligence agent who was jailed for alleged involvement in a plot to assassinate President Hugo Chavez.

The minister of prisons, Iris Varela, announced the expulsion of Frederic Laurent Bouquet in a Twitter message Saturday.

Varela said Bouquet was arrested on June 18, 2009, and confessed that he came to Venezuela to assassinate Chavez. She said he was caught with weapons.

She offered no other details on the case. It was unclear if the man was ever formally charged.

Varela did not say where Bouquet was being sent. She said only that he was being deported under a law that allows the government to expel anyone who threatens Venezuela's security.

A photo that accompanied Varela's tweet showed a handcuffed man wearing a bullet-proof vest and being escorted by police.

Officials at the ministry of prisons did not return phone calls asking for further comment on the announcement.

Nobody answered the phone at the French Embassy in Caracas.

Saturday, December 29, 2012

Africa 2012 In Review: Imperialism Advances While Resistance Spreads

Africa 2012 In Review: Imperialism Advances While Resistance Spreads
From Cairo to Cape Town the African masses struggle for justice and self-determination
By Abayomi Azikiwe
Editor, Pan-African News Wire

During late 2012, the Obama administration announced that it would be dispatching additional military personnel to the African continent. The deployment of regular troops and Special Forces are purportedly tasked with fighting a growing threat from Islamists under the guise of a growing "al-Qaeda threat."

Yet the placing of more troops in Africa by the Pentagon follows a pattern of escalating U.S. militarism on the continent. The previous year, 2011, saw the first full-blown project of the U.S. Africa Command (AFRICOM) in the support for a counter-revolutionary insurgency and massive bombing campaign against the North African state of Libya.

In Libya, 2012 was a year of further political repression, economic depravation and social chaos. Persecutions of Black Libyans and supporters of the former Jamahiriya under the leadership of Col. Muammar Gaddafi continued.

Counter-revolutionaries in the east of the oil-rich state, where the rebellion of 2011 saw its origins, advocated the partitioning of the country due to the vast resource wealth in that region. There was widespread rejection of the sham national elections by people in both the east and the south of the country.

In Benghazi, people burned ballot papers and objected to the proposed political dispensation which disproportionately allocated more nominal power to the U.S.-backed politicians based in the west around the capital of Tripoli. Even among the elites in the capital, there were clashes among rival militias and threats against the politicians by the armed rebels who refused to be disarmed and "integrated" into a "national army."

The situation in Libya was further exposed on September 11 when a U.S. compound and annex was destroyed by over 100 armed combatants. The attacks led to the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens and three other personnel, which were later identified as Navy Seals and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) operatives.

A subsequent attempted cover-up of the September 11 incident in Libya resulted in a major scandal in Washington centering around the failure of the Obama administration to secure the compound after repeated warnings that U.S. interests in the Benghazi area were under threat. Susan Rice, Washington's representative at the United Nations, was forced to take the fall for the Benghazi disaster despite the fact that Stevens post was ostensibly under the control of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

What was even more revealing was the claim by the New York Times later that the attacks in Benghazi against U.S. interests were the biggest blow to the CIA in over three decades. Obviously Stevens' role in Libya was one of a CIA official who was responsible for the coordination of the counter-revolution.

Despite the scandal involving Rice's false claims on national television indicating that the deaths of Stevens and the others resulted from a demonstration against the vile "Innocence of Muslims" film that was circulating on the internet, the deaths of the U.S. personnel in Benghazi did not jeopardize the Obama presidency. Even though the Republicans attempted to utilize the scandal to undermine the Obama campaign, the fact of the matter is that they too were as adamant against the previous Libyan government under Gaddafi as the Democrats.

Obama's core constituency including African Americans, Latinos, trade unions and others saw the alternative Romney bid for the presidency as a threat to their well-being although objectively the people of the U.S. have grown poorer and more economically distressed over the last four years. The U.S. bi-polar political system provides no real alternatives to working people and the oppressed.

The Obama administration has in actuality increased imperialist military intervention in Africa as well as other parts of the world. Over the last four years there has been no positive initiatives related to the peace and security of the continent and the world under the present regime in Washington.

Theoretical Perspectives on Imperialism in Africa

Obama's Africa policy is a continuation of imperialist efforts to dominate and exploit the people. From slavery to colonialism and neo-colonialism, the U.S. has been on the wrong side of history against the interests of the African workers, farmers and youth.

Kwame Nkrumah, the president of the First Republic of Ghana, and the leading theoretical and organizational figure within the post-World War II Pan-African Movement, wrote in 1968 that "Every state emerging from colonialism has to face, sooner or later, the threat to its independence of an alliance between local, reactionary elements and imperialist and neo-colonialist interests. The problem is serious, but not insurmountable, once its true nature is assessed and adequate steps are taken in time to prevent it from becoming deep-rooted." (Dark Days in Ghana, pp. 157-8)

Nkrumah continues noting that "We must be constantly vigilant. Imperialist intelligence organizations are hard at work in Africa, manipulating political pressures internally and externally within developing, independent states. Evidence of their activities may be seen hitherto virtually outside our political experience, but in recent years a painful reminder that we are not yet masters in our own house."

Later this same author stresses that "Government officials, police and army officers, party leaders, newspaper editors and others have been bribed and black-mailed. Local bourgeois reactionaries, dishonest intellectuals and retrogressive chiefs are being used to subvert progressive governments. The tragedy is, that some African Heads of State are themselves actually aiding and abetting imperialists and neo-colonialists."

This is even more true in 2012 than it was in 1968. The subversion of the popular political will of the workers and rural proletariat of Africa serves as a major impediment to the organization of the masses for a genuine struggle against foreign domination and military intervention.

In most of the countries throughout the continent where the U.S. has strategic interests there are military campaigns designed to continue Washington's influence. From Egypt, Tunisia, Sudan, the Central African Republic, Mali, Somalia, South Africa, Zimbabwe, Nigeria and others, the financiers of Wall Street and the arms producers and generals in the service of the Pentagon are poised for greater interference in the internal affairs of these states.

Obama's announcement about the deployment of U.S. forces to 35 states is linked to the crisis within the world capitalist system, where unemployment, national debt and escalating poverty has increased to unprecedented levels within the imperialists states since World War II.

Some Concrete Examples of Imperialist Policy and Mass Resistance

Egypt and the struggle for revolutionary democracy in North Africa and the Middle East has reached a critical stage with the holding of a referendum on the draft constitution put in place by the ruling Freedom and Justice Party (FJP) and its Islamist allies in the Constiutent Assembly and the administration of President Mohamed Morsi. Although the referendum won by a 64-36 percent margin, overall participation within the electorate was less than one-third of those qualified to vote.

Leading up to the referendum on December 15 and 22, there were mass demonstrations by opposition parties and coalitions throughout the country of 83 million people. Several people were killed in the protests with a National Salvation Front being formed to demand the withdrawal of the presidential decree of November 22 and the rushed constitutional process.

The Muslim Brotherhood and allied organizations are facing a serious political crisis. They have sought to address the problems of neo-colonialism, stemming from decades of U.S. influence militarily, politically and economically, by a continuation of an alliance with the White House and the Pentagon.

This path on the part of the Egyptian government that came to power after a national election in June, will not benefit the workers and farmers of the country. The Morsi administration is seeking a $US4.8 billion loan from the International Monetary Fund (IMF), an institution that has caused massive suffering on the African continent for decades.

In addition, Egypt's positions on the war in Syria, which is another regime-change effort on the part of imperialism, and its less than firm stance in defense of the Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank, is a reflection of ongoing U.S. dominance over its foreign policy. Promises of investments from Qatar, the European Union along with the proposed IMF loan will consolidate a neo-colonial framework even under the FJP government.

This same process is also talking place in neighboring Tunisia which is the cradle of the uprisings which were initiated two years ago. In Tunisia, the rights of women, youth and workers must be addressed in order for the struggle for national development and genuine independence to proceed.

It is not enough to overthrow the longtime puppets of U.S. and French imperialism, although this is monumental in its significance. The real struggle is to establish an economic and foreign policy independence as the only road towards national liberation and social justice for the majority of people within the society. The process taking place in Egypt and Tunisia is instructive for viewing developments in other parts of the African continent and the Middle East.

Sudan after being partitioned in the vote of 2011 in the South of the country, these developments have weakened both separate states. This split has also caused greater consternation and internal conflict in both the Republic of Sudan and the Republic of South Sudan.

In the fighting around the Heglig oil fields earlier in the year, the country was exposed to the threat of the collapse of its economies. Demonstrations surfaced in Khartoum fueled by opposition parties demanding regime-change aimed at toppling the National Congress Party (NCP) government of President Omar Hassan al-Bashir.

South Sudan has experienced the aggravated plight of neo-colonial African states. Complaints of massive corruption coupled with internecine warfare among various regions and nationalities has hampered any economic benefit from its newly independent status.

Peace talks between the two states could gain results if it were not for the interference of the U.S. and the state of Israel. The Israel Air Force (IAF) bombed a munitions factory in the capital of Khartoum in late October while Sudan and the Islamic Republic of Iran were conducting joint naval manueveres around the eastern port.

The State Department's role in the Sudans is to maintain and inflame the divisions inside the country due to the oil-wealth and the role of the People's Republic of China and Iran. Both states collectively must resist these pressures and form a national unity pact that cannot be penetrated and undermined by the imperialists led by the ruling class in the U.S.

In defiance of Washington and Tel Aviv, the Republic of Sudan has escalated its solidarity efforts with the Palestinian people and the Iranians. The defeat of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in their latest onslaught against the people of Gaza militarily--and diplomatically with the attempt to deny greater recognition of the Palesinians in the United Nations General Assembly--proved that the policies of the U.S. and Israel are more vunerable than ever.

The Republic of South Sudan's alliance with the state of Israel proved problematic when South Sudanese fell victim to the racist domestic policies of Tel Aviv. Sudanese and other Africans were openly attacked in the streets of the occupationist state where a new prison to house Africans is being constructed amid official statements by Zionist politicians which call for the forced removal of Africans alongside a similar program for the Palestinians.

Military coups struck both Mali and Guinea-Bissau during March and April. These military coups were a reflection of the class struggle in Africa where with the interference of the imperialists, the post-colonial African state is incapable of maintaining the economic viability or national security of its territory and people.

Mali had been heavily infiltrated by the Pentagon through AFRICOM's joint military operations with Bamako. In Guinea-Bissau, the ruling African Party for the Independence of Guinea and Cape Verde PAIGC) was overthrown by elements within the military which sought to maintain its corrupt actions in league with the capitalist ruling class.

Despite the call by the masses in both countries for an end to military rule, the lower-ranking soldiers continue to hold power. A proposed intervention in Mali by the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) and the African Union (AU) will be coordinated and financed by the Pentagon and the French military, but will not solve the problems of divisions and militarism in West Africa.

At some point African states must break with the western military alliances and form their own independent military forces that can take on continental problems in the best interests of the masses within these various countries. There is a threat of more military coups in Africa with the burgeoning economic crisis and the escalating intervention of the Pentagon, the IDF, France, Britain and other NATO forces.

Developments in the Horn of Africa illustrate clearly the dangers of militarism and intelligence penetration. Somalia has been a battleground for the U.S. and its allies for over two decades. The invasion of December 1992 began a process of attempted domination of the region both inland and offshore.

The intervention of Washington and its allies in the region has worsened the humanitarian crises of the people. Massive dislocation, disease and death are the by-products of U.S. imperialism.

With 17,000 surrogate troops occupying Somalia under the rubric of the African Union Mission to Somalia (AMISOM) in conjunction with Ethiopian soldiers and the Kenya Defense Forces, the U.S. is in a position to strengthen the presence of the CIA and the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA). Drones have become a regular weapon within the Somalia theater and these drones are being deployed throughout East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula as well as the Indian Ocean.

Despite the heavy U.S.-led war against the people of Somalia, the country has yet to be subdued. The Al-Shabab resistance fighters are regrouping and launching renewed attacks in the south and central regions of the country.

Oil is a key factor in the struggle for Somalia. New findings of both oil and natural gas inland and offshore throughout East Africa underlines the intensification of Pentagon and CIA presence in this region of the world.

These findings provide new avenues of exploitation for the transnational corporations and the banks. The U.S. has troops deployed in Uganda, the Central African Republic, South Sudan and the eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

The DRC is rich with mineral resources much of which is not being exploited to the benefit of the national government based in Kinshasa. A recent insurgency by M23 is financed and coordinated by Rwanda, a surrogate of Washington and Wall Street in East Africa. Inside the DRC and the East and Central Africa region, millions have been killed over the last fifteen years in wars engineered by the Pentagon, the State Department and the CIA.

Nigeria, the largest importer of African oil into the U.S., is being systematically destabilized resulting from imperialist dependence and manipulation. Nigeria has opened negotiations with the People's Republic of China related to cooperation in the petroleum industry.

Yet the U.S. and Britain are determined to keep Nigeria within its sphere of influence. Joint so-called "counter-terrorism" operations are leading to deeper penetrations by U.S. intelligence over the Nigerian state apparatus and military. Nonetheless, in 2012, Nigerian workers rose up in strikes and mass demonstations against the cancellation of fuel subsidies and other economic issues. These struggles must be politicized and directed towards winning greater economic independence from the U.S. and Europe.

Southern Africa is still a focal point in the anti-capitalist and anti-imperialist struggle. In South Africa the world was shocked and horrified with the killing of 34 workers in a massacre by police at Marikana on August 16. The wildcat and protected strikes that spread throughout the country, which has Africa's largest economy, is rooted in the world economic crisis.

The ruling African National Congress (ANC) came to power in 1994 on the wave of unprecedented mass actions that mobilied and organized millions of African workers, youth and farmers. However, the current economic crisis impacting the country can only be ameliorated with the seizure of industry and agricultural resources inside the country.

As the economic crisis of capitalism worsens, the ANC government will come under greater pressure to grant further concessions to the imperialists. There have already been large-scale downsizing in the gold sector--and platinum, which the country has the world's largest supply--will also follow suit although with more difficulty for the mining bosses.

The National Democratic Revolution has no choice but to move towards socialism and the power of the working class in South Africa is poised to do so. The lessons of Zimbabwe since 2000 will be instructive to the people of South Africa in their quest for genuine economic and political independence.

In Zimbabwe, the ruling Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front party (ZANU-PF) has nationalized millions of acres of land and turned it over to African farmers. At present the party is seeking to "indigenize" mining ownership and production.

Zimbabawe has been villified and attacked by the imperialist states. Sanctions imposed by the U.S. and Britain remain in force even under the African American President Barack Obama. Nonetheless, the country and party is gaining strength amid these ongoing destabilization efforts.

Prospects for Progress in 2013

In order for Africa to develop their must be a break with imperialism. The growing alliance with the People's Republic of China illlustrates that Africa is looking for alternative economic and political alliances away from the western states.

Nkrumah points out that "In Africa, the resistance of the masses to imperialist aggression grows daily. African freedom and unity have become their watchwords. In that alone lies their fulfilment. The higher the level of a people's political awareness the greater is their understanding of their historical mission. Africa is ripe for armed revolution." (Dark Days in Ghana, p. 158)

The same text goes on emphasizing that "This great upsurge of the African peoples can only be effective if it is organized, and if it is armed. The time has past for half-measures and piecemeal solutions. No compromise is possible while reactionary and counter-revolutionary elements exist in Africa, and while imperialists and neo-colonialists are able to make use of them for their own ends."

Today in 2013, the imperialists are more desperate than at any point during the post-World War II period. This crisis has its origins within the western capitalist states under the leadership of the U.S.

Consequently, U.S. interests must be challenged throughout Africa in order for economic and political liberation to be realized. Once the ruling class interests have been subdued, the continent can move towards rebuilding from the centuries of slavery, colonialism and neo-colonialism.

As Nkrumah proclaimed that "If for a while the imperialists appear to be gaining ground, we must not be discouraged. For time is on our side. The permanency of the masses is the deciding factor, and no power on earth can prevent its ultimate decisive effect on the revolutionary struggle." (Dark Days in Ghana, p. 159)

People's Struggle Against Home Foreclosures Advances in New Jersey

People’s struggle against home foreclosures advances in NJ

By David Hungerford
fightbacknews.org
December 28, 2012

Trenton, NJ, - The people’s struggle against foreclosures took a new turn before the New Jersey Court of Appeals here, Dec. 19.

Foreclosure today is capitalism in chaos, a capitalism of swindling even on its own terms. New problems require new tactics of struggle.

In early December, Attorney Adam Deutsch was invited to speak to the Coalition to Save Our Homes, a group in Essex County that organizes homeowners to take the initiative in the struggle against predatory lending. He suggested that one thing people can do is turn out and pack the courtroom when important foreclosure defense motions are presented.

He later mentioned a case in progress that shows the marks of chaos. The bank, HSBC, had never met the requirements of law to prove it held a financial interest in the mortgage. In the foreclosure trial the judge pointed out to the HSBC attorney that the mortgage note, the crucial point of the bank’s financial interest in the property, had not been submitted to the court. The attorney replied that no defense was being made.

No one would argue that, if someone walked into a store when no one was there, they could lawfully clean out the till and walk off with the money. The judge should have stopped right there and not allowed HSBC to continue until it proved it had a claim on the house. Instead HSBC was allowed to proceed. This defect and others in HSBC’s case were not removed in the foreclosure hearing when final judgment (i.e., order of foreclosure) was granted against the homeowner.

A big problem for the defense appeal is that the homeowner did not come to court to defend before judgment of foreclosure was issued. The defense therefore had to deal with procedural issues of delays in filing, as well as seizure of property by a bank with no proven financial interest in it. The defense also says lower court decisions were made in error and should be reversed.

These issues figure in millions of predatory lending cases. Courts far too often exhibit a double standard. Homeowners are excused for nothing and banks for anything.

The difference in the Dec. 19 hearing was that homeowners, activists, and organized labor representatives showed up in court. A case that ordinarily would have been heard before an empty courtroom was heard before a body of citizens with their own sense of justice. The discomfort of the bank’s attorney was obvious. He began in a mumbling tone of voice and an attendee called out, “We can’t hear you.” Ordinarily that is a big no-no in court but the only result was that the attorney spoke up. He distanced himself from the issue of ownership of the mortgage note. The court asked if the bank had submitted properly certified proof of ownership - the defense contends it had not - and the response was a stammered, “I guess so.”

Decisions are not delivered at appeals court hearings. The judges take the case under advisement and issue their decision later.

However the decision turns out, the day showed the way forward. The people’s forces felt a sense of unity and empowerment. We can fight the banks, we can fight foreclosure. We don’t have to settle for making the best of a bad situation. We can attack the bad situation itself. If there is no justice in the halls of justice we will bring our own standard of justice. We will depend on ourselves to build a broader, stronger, more united movement for people’s economic justice, and we will succeed.

Friday, December 28, 2012

Protest at Headquarters of Boeing, Maker of Spy Drones Used Against Iran

Protest at HQ of Boeing, maker of spy drones used against Iran

By Staff
fightbacknews.org
December 21, 2012

Chicago, IL - As the first winter storm of the season arrived here, Dec. 20, 20 hearty souls stood outside the Boeing Company headquarters by the Chicago River, carrying signs opposing war.

“Hands off Syria!” “Hands off Iran!” and “Who is the terrorist? Boeing is the terrorist!” they chanted as rain poured down.

Boeing responded to the anti-war protest with a show of force by security guards, guard dogs and Chicago Police.

Shivering in the cold, Kait McIntyre of the Anti-War Committee of Chicago was not backing down from the weather or the cops. “Boeing makes fighter jets and attack helicopters. They make uranium depleted bombs for example, that were dropped on Gaza in 2008, causing an increase in birth defects. And in addition, Boeing makes spy drones for the U.S. to use over Iran.” She concluded, “We have to speak out against the growing threat of war against Syria and Iran and to demand that money go to funding human needs at home, not wars that profit companies like Boeing.”

U.S. 'Terror' and Gun Laws Extended to Somalia

U.S. ‘terror’ and gun laws extended to Somalia

Somalis face New York City trial

By Mick Kelly
December 28, 2012
fightbacknews.org

Brooklyn, NY - Three men from Somalia, Ali Yasin Ahmed, Madhi Hashi and Mohamed Yusuf, appeared in Federal District Court here, Dec. 21, on charges of violating U.S. “material support for terrorism” and gun laws. What makes this case different from the dozens of U.S. cases involving Somali men and women in Minnesota, California and other states is that there is no indication the men are U.S. residents or citizens, or that they have ever traveled to the U.S.

The conspiracy to provide “material support to a foreign terrorist organization” stems from their alleged membership in the Somali resistance organization, al Shabaab. Al Shabaab is an Islamic political movement that is fighting the U.S.-backed foreign intervention in Somalia.

The gun charge, according to a Dec. 21 press release form the New York Eastern District U.S. Attorney’s Office, involves the “unlawful use of machine guns” in Somalia.

The case against the three men rests on the dubious legal theory that U.S. laws can be applied anywhere in the world. The New York Times states, “Court documents show no connection between the alleged crimes and the United States.”

Two of the men, Mohamed Yusuf and Ali Yasin Ahmed, lived in Sweden for a time. Madhi Hashi was born in Somalia and grew up in England. The British newspaper, The Independent reported on Dec. 23 that when Hashi lived in London, he was one of a group of young people who said they were pressured by the UK intelligence agency, MI5, to become informants. After his return to Somalia, Hashi’s UK citizenship was revoked.

The Independent says of Hashi, “His family had no idea where he was for five months until he appeared in a New York court on Friday accused of terrorism. Last night, his British lawyer, Saghir Hussain, said: ‘This has all the hallmarks of rendition. It appears the withdrawal of citizenship and the kidnapping by the Americans may have been co-ordinated.’”

The U.S. Attorney’s Office claims, “In early August 2012, the defendants were apprehended in Africa by local authorities while on their way to Yemen.” On Oct. 18, 2012, a grand jury in the Eastern District of New York returned a sealed indictment against the defendants. On Nov. 14, 2012, the Federal Bureau of Investigation took custody of the defendants and brought them to the Eastern District of New York.”

The Independent quotes Hashi’s father, Mohamed, “’We are not some slaves who can be passed around from one owner to another,’ he said. ‘Why was our son sent to the U.S.? He has been a British citizen for 15 years but then his citizenship was taken away suddenly and now we find out that he's in New York? Our family had to find out this news from public news sources as no one has contacted us until now. We are very worried about his condition as we have no information. The U.S. have not given our son any rights – we don't know where he's being held, how to contact him or how he's being treated. It is shocking that something like this can be done to someone based on accusations and suspicion only.’”

Among those who announced the charges against the three men Dec. 21 was Raymond Kelly, the Commissioner of New York City Police Department. The NYPD has built a massive intelligence network that spys on Arabs and Muslims around the U.S. It is also setting up satellite offices in other countries.

Kenyan Oil Expectations Rise for 2013

Kenya: Oil Expectations Rise in 2013

By Solomon Kirimi, 28 December 2012
The Star

Kenya has no confirmed oil deposits yet but the year 2012 will remain the best for Kenya's quest to join the league of oil producers.

For a country which a year ago had no reason to think of ever becoming an oil producer, two wells at appraisal stage in Northern Kenya and gas finds at the coast is exciting.

It all started on March 26th of 2012, with the announcement that Ngamia-1 oil well in Lokichar area of Turkana in the Rift Basin had 20 metres of net oil pay.

Tullow Oil made the announcement that the Ngamia-1 exploration well, located in Block 10BB, had then been drilled to a depth of 1,041 metres, within which light waxy crude was discovered.

"This is an excellent start to our major exploration campaign in the East African rift basins and to make a good oil discovery in our first well is beyond our expectations and bodes well for the material programme ahead of us," said Tullow Exploration Director Angus McCoss, We look forward to further success as seismic and drilling activities continue to gather pace."

Two months later the Ngamia-1 well encountered oil and gas shows over a gross interval of 140 metres from a depth of 1,800 metres to 1,940 metres.

"God can not be so unfair to give our neighbor oil and gas and leave Kenya with nothing," energy minister Kiraitu Murungi said in reference to oil discoveries in Uganda, huge gas deposit find in Tanzania and the already oil producing Sudan.

The discoveries by Tullow suddenly the interest in exploration of in Kenya were revived just over a half a year after being dampened by the exit of Chinese explorer CNOOC from Isiolo in October 2012 after finding just traces of gas.

The Isiolo Boghal-1 well in block 9 well was plugged and abandoned because the gas was deemed to be of no commercial value.

"If the gas was of commercial value, Kenya would have received a lot of interest for exploration blocks," The then discouraged Energy permanent secretary Patrick Nyoike said.

CNOOC had sunk $26 million (Sh2.2 billion) to drill the well to a depth of 5,085 metres and quit before reaching 5,556 metres initial target.

CNOOC partner in the initial venture African Oil have now partnered with Marathon Oil to re-open the well following the successes by Tullow oil up north.

The lucky streak by Tullow oil followed them offshore to Mbawa1 in Lamu basin where 50 metres of net gas pay was found.

Tullow is a minor shareholder in the block L8 with Amerca's Apache corporation, Austalia's Pancontinental. Although the gas find was not of commercial value and was plugged, this increased the appetite for explorers with prospects looking good for presence of oil and gas of the Kenyan coast.

Tullow Oil's good run of results followed them to Twiga South-1 exploration well in Block 13T where in late November they encountered oil, confirming a rush announcement by partners Africa Oil Corp on October 26 2012.

Tullow Oil plc announced that the Twiga South-1 exploration well drilling had encountered 30 metres of net oil pay. A further potential of a gross interval of 796 metres net pay is to be assessed before being declared.

The finds have now moved Kenya from a high risk exploration country to high value target for world majors looking for a piece of the action in a region promising to be latest exploration frontier.

On the Cusp of Change: The Future of Africa's Working Women

On the Cusp of Change: The Future of Africa's Working Women

By Abbie Saunders
THURSDAY DECEMBER 27, 2012
The International

Last week the Rwandan President Paul Kagame spoke out about the importance of self-sustaining economic growth in 2013. The withdrawal of certain charitable aids from the country came after Kagame criticized reliance upon international organizations. The President declared that “this (headquarter) initiative is aimed at showcasing the Rwandese energy and capacity to be self reliant, and that no one can come from abroad and build our capacity like this facility.”

The initiative itself, termed ‘Agaciro’, is reminiscent of the Mali’s self-sufficiency ideal, which was encouraged by the country’s workers after March’s coup d’état. 75% of Malian workers are farmers and many prefer to reject international aid in favour of cultivating their own arable land for their most prolific agricultural exports: cotton, rice, vegetables, shea butter, and tuna. Mali’s trade industry is dominated by local women, and by the end of 2011, foreign investment in Mali’s arable land had increased by 60%. Wealthy nations such as China and Saudi Arabia have invested in the land for their own cultivation purposes, destroying many of the trees and plants that Malians rely so heavily upon for their own trade.

The coup d’état of March 2012 necessitated the withdrawal of various foreign organizations, such as the instalment of the sugar-plantation project SOSUMAR. In the recent ‘Why Poverty?’ documentary ‘Land Rush’ the working women of Mali were interviewed, expressing their support for the project. But in a country where 90% of African working women already operate in the manufacture of trading goods, how will the withdrawal of international charities affect their role?

How is Malian trade affected by women working on arable land?

African working women are indispensable to trade. The Women of Africa charity quotes that “50-60% of the workforce in developing countries [work] in the informal sector” with women comprising “90% of […] the informal sector”. Opinions on the level of feminist consciousness in Africa are strongly divided. Women make up 70% of the 1.8 billion people that live from less than $1 per day, and yet women are responsible for some of the most profitable African exports.

In 2008, Mali was responsible for exporting 80,000 tons of shea nuts, ranking second only to Burkina Faso having exported 90,000 tons in the same year. The shea tree is unique to Africa. Sonja Melissa Perakis in her study of Shea trade in Mali quotes that “most rural women residing in the ‘shea belt’ participate in the production, processing (handling), and marketing of shea.” The African shea trees are responsible for the livelihood and employment of the majority of Malian women. As a result, they generate an estimated $20million trade per annum, based upon the projection of USAID in conjunction with West Africa Trade Hub’s figures in March 2010.

Despite the prolific nature of shea trade, many of these women live at the very bottom of the world poverty scale. It is the relationship between working and earning that polarizes opinions about how the development of Malian land by international organizations might affect the role of the African working woman.

When the SOSUMAR sugar-plantation was proposed, it was allotted 25,000 hectares of land. According to the National Coordination of Peasant Organizations, only 280 hectares are presently occupied. Working women were divided over the initial development. In ‘Land Rush’, several women voice their concerns over the replacement of shea trees with the sugar plantation. They consider that their already prolific local trade is being destroyed and replaced by an American or a European corporation trade system that will not benefit them. “If they give us a lot of money for our land, then our land is more valuable than their money”, says one local.

One working woman interviewed by ‘Why Poverty?’ remarks upon the benefits of the development project. She says that working opportunities for women will be provided by the sugar-plantation, working opportunities that may generate a greater income for the individual working woman. The majority of women that work in the shea butter trade are still expected to live from less than $1 per day. On the sugar plantation many Malian women believe that men and women will have equal access to both working and earning.

Since the coup d’état the majority of land allotted to the project has been abandoned. The organizations were forced to withdraw their development project as a result of the uprising. As 2012 draws to a close, many countries in Africa are attempting to reform their charity and land distribution policies. The spotlight falls once again upon Mali as divided opinions about self-sufficiency cast a shadow upon the long-standing traditions of working women in Africa.

How may the traditions of working women in Africa change as a result of charity and land distribution policies in 2013?

Different charities and land distribution policies established in these African third-world countries ultimately have different goals. Some land distribution deprives the working women of their land altogether by attributing it to a foreign source, whilst some actually provide women with the opportunity to work and earn on behalf of a charitable corporate project. Women’s views are polarized about charitable aid in Mali; some believe that it will help them pursue their own independence, whilst others believe that it encourages a dependence on charitable corporation by hindering their own trade.

It is a violation of Malian property law for the government to sell local arable land, and yet before the coup d’état foreign agro-investment increased by 60%. The world food crisis of 2008 and consequent poverty led to China, Ukraine, and Saudi Arabia purchasing vast amounts of land against Malian legislation. These countries are destroying the trees and plants that are central to Mali’s local trade. They are cultivating the land to provide food for their own densely-populated countries.

The strong militant presence in Mali has damaged charitable investment and capital generated by tourism in recent months. In the same way as Rwanda officials are discouraging charitable presence, Mali is now forced to be largely self-sufficient. But is it too late for Malian self-reliance? It is among the 25 poorest countries in the world and landlocked, having illegally sacrificed large quantities of land to foreign agribusiness. Self-reliance for women in the present Malian economic climate has been compromised by a hindrance of their local trade; now that their land has been sacrificed, can Malian women be expected to have the resources to sustain a self-sufficient industry and lifestyle?

Oxfam claim that Malian women have enjoyed “few land rights”, stating that their agricultural livelihood hangs in the balance due to competition with bio fuel production. Oxfam asks “will employment prospects cover the livelihood of women?” In an increasingly restricted local agribusiness infrastructure and with restricted access to education, women are largely confined to the informal trade workforce of Mali. In the battle between the foreign mechanization of agribusiness and local self-sufficiency, both options provide alternative outcomes. Either women are forced to sacrifice their local trade to become part of a corporate workforce, or they sacrifice a stable working opportunity to continue working in an environment that is increasingly challenged by restricted land, bio fuel and mass production. Since the mutinous uprising of March 2012, the growing number of corporate projects have become largely redundant. The land was allotted to the projects, and abandoned in the light of political turmoil. Thousands of hectares of this land remain unused. Charitable aid, however, remains key to the growth and sustainability of Malian trade. Organizations such as “Women of Africa” work with small groups of girls and women, teaching them how to control their own development, encouraging future self-management. The charities have worked specifically with the women of Mali for the valorization of local products and trade.

The development of policies concerning Malian agribusiness will be crucial in 2013. However, until charity and land distribution policies are reformed, the role of the African working woman remains fragile. Whatever employment prospects arise, Oxfam questions the livelihood of women, asking whether or not in the future “women may be completely eliminated from the scene”. Women’s fragility in Mali and other African third-world countries remains abnormal. And with the rejection of charitable aid, these governments risk damaging themselves and their local trade further. “Women of Africa” recognize that Malian women are “crucial to ensure the sustainability of our societies, because they are working, courageous, responsible and good managers”. If charitable organizations are forced to withdraw from the country in 2013, Mali’s women may ultimately be forced to reject the opportunity to become truly “powerful” women through the training and practice that charities such as “Women of Africa” offer. For now, the roles of such strong women remain fragile, and this abnormal irony continues to define the working women of Mali.

U.S. Diplomats Leave Central African Republic's Capital as Rebels Advance

U.S. diplomats leave Central African Republic’s capital as rebels advance

HIPPOLYTE MARBOUA and KRISTA LARSON
BANGUI — The Associated Press
Friday, Dec. 28 2012, 9:15 PM EST

Renewed fighting between government forces and rebels seeking to overthrow the president broke out Friday in Central African Republic’s third largest city, a military official said, hours after the U.S. ambassador and his team were evacuated from the capital.

Government soldiers appeared to be in control of Bambari after the clashes, according to military officials. The town is located about 385 kilometres from the capital and had been under rebel control for five days.

The United States evacuated about 40 people, including the U.S. ambassador, on a U.S. Air Force plane bound for Kenya, said U.S. officials, who insisted on anonymity because they weren’t authorized to discuss the operation. The United States has special forces in the country who are assisting in the hunt for Joseph Kony, the fugitive leader of another rebel group known as the Lord’s Resistance Army. The U.S. special forces remain in the country, the U.S. military’s Africa Command said from its headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany.

The evacuation of the U.S. diplomats came in the wake of criticism of how the U.S. handled diplomatic security before and during the attack on its consulate in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11. The ambassador and three other Americans were killed in that attack.

France’s diplomats are staying despite a violent demonstration outside its embassy earlier this week. Dozens of protesters, angry about a lack of help against rebel forces, threw rocks at the French embassy in Bangui and stole a French flag. French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius spoke via phone with President François Bozize, asking him to take responsibility for the safety of French nationals and diplomatic missions in Central African Republic.

Mr. Bozize on Thursday urgently called on former colonial ruler France and other foreign powers to help his government fend off rebels, who are quickly seizing territory and approaching the capital. But French President François Hollande said France wants to protect its interests in Central African Republic and not Mr. Bozize’s government.

This landlocked nation of 4.4 million people has suffered decades of army revolts, coups and rebellions since gaining independence in 1960 and remains one of the poorest countries in the world. The current President himself came to power nearly a decade ago in the wake of a rebellion.

Speaking to crowds in Bangui, a city of 600,000, Mr. Bozize pleaded with foreign powers to do what they could. He pointed in particular to France. About 200 French soldiers are already in the country, providing technical support and helping to train the local army, according to the French Defence Ministry.

“France has the means to stop [the rebels] but unfortunately they have done nothing for us until now,” Mr. Bozize said.

The rebels behind the most recent instability signed a 2007 peace accord allowing them to join the regular army, but insurgent leaders say the deal wasn’t fully implemented. The rebel forces have seized at least 10 towns across the sparsely populated north of the country, and residents in the capital now fear the insurgents could attack at any time, despite assurances by rebel leaders that they are willing to engage in dialogue instead of attacking Bangui.

The rebels have claimed that their actions are justified in light of the “thirst for justice, for peace, for security and for economic development of the people of Central African Republic.”

Despite CAR’s wealth of gold, diamonds, timber and uranium, the government remains perpetually cash-strapped.

The United Nations’ most powerful body condemned the recent violence and expressed concern about the developments.

“The members of the Security Council reiterate their demand that the armed groups immediately cease hostilities, withdraw from captured cities and cease any further advance toward the city of Bangui,” the statement said.

December in Libya: Political Epitaph of Obama, Cameron

December in Libya: Political epitaph of Obama, Cameron...

29.12.2012
Pravda.ru

One of NATO's "defenceless civilians"

Two years on, under the guidance of the FUKUS Axis (France, UK, US) terrorists, Libya continues to live a nightmare of chaos sown by these demonic hordes, entering villages to murder, commit ethnic cleansing, rape, torture, steal and install regimes of terror in local communities formerly living together in peace.

A fitting political legacy for Messrs. Obama, Cameron and Hollande, also Hillary Clinton, William Hague and Laurent Fabius in 2012 is the fact that two years on, there are Libyans risking their lives getting the truth out, telling the outside world about what is really going on in the country formerly (under al-Qadhafi) with the highest development rates and living standards in Africa.

And what is going on is utterly shocking. Development rates and standard of living indices have plummeted, to the extent that there is no available data. The lies spun by NATO in general and the FUKUS trio in particular over the casus belli in Libya are now famous: al-Qadhafi was not killing his own people, he was not bombing his own people, he was desperately trying to fight against Al-Qaeda which the United States of America, the United Kingdom and France let back into Libya.

The heroic Green Resistance formed among the loyalists to Muammar al-Qadhafi, standing up for the Jamahiriya system of government which saw local communities solve their own problems asking the central Government to provide for their needs, standing up for the communities trying to fight against the foreign-backed terrorist scourge which has plagued Libyan villages, towns and cities. The Green Resistance today fights against these murderers, rapists and thieves, fights against the FUKUS intervention in Libya, engendered to steal Libya's money and resources and the members of the Green resistance risk their lives to bring us the truth.

The least we can do is spread the word. And the word, in December 2012, is this: a terrorist leader Mankoosh was seized in Morocco at the beginning of December (he dared not even stay in Libya) and he is supposed to have been exterminated; the terrorist leader Bahr Addin es-Sulimani has allegedly been liquidated by Green Resistance fighters in the southern city of Sebha.

Refugees (black Libyans, ethnically cleansed by NATO-backed terrorists) from Taverga were massacred by FUKUS supported murderers in Tripoli. Many such incidents have taken place over the past year and a half and not one word from Obama, Cameron or Hollande, Clinton, Hague or Fabius. After all, there is nothing for them to say or do except hang their heads in shame. But they are too arrogant even to do so. Their "freedom delivery" in Libya has to be judged by the consequences of their idiotic, criminal and murderous policy, and it shall be... it shall be.

Many Libyan citizens have been freed from concentration and rape and torture camps manned by the FUKUS Axis terrorists. Many Libyan citizens kidnapped by the FUKUS terrorist filth had their organs removed, often (almost always) without anaesthetic; women and children were held as sex slaves and many were sold off to brothels abroad. It is obvious that the Libyan "rebels" were the dregs of society, common criminals aided and abetted by the USA, UK and France, given guns and a carte blanche to perpetrate their fantasies on law-abiding citizens. We now put the recent document alleging that Saudi Arabia has released the dregs from its mental hospitals and prisons into Syria, elements backed by the same (who else?) FUKUS Axis into this context.

Read "Syria" into "Libya". A group of some 50 terrorists were exterminated over Christmas on the border with Chad; the Green Resistance informs that the entire herd of this filth was liquidated, not one of them survived to infest other areas of Libya. Some sources claim that once more there were western elements or elements from the Gulf Cooperation Council (Qatar, Saudi Arabia and other friends of the FUKUS Axis in the Middle East doing its dirty work against other Arabs) among the terrorist scourge.

What a disgusting and revolting comment on the foreign policies of the USA, UK and France and how equally disgusting and revolting it is that people in these countries sit back and do nothing. As for the Gulf States, as al-Qadhafi said, donkeys ridden by foreigners. I personally would go further, much further.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey
Pravda.Ru

Hundreds Protest Against Rebel Militias in Occupied Libya

Hundreds protest against militias in Libya's Benghazi

By blade
Created 28/12/2012 - 19:28

Some 2,000 people rallied in Libya's second city Benghazi on Friday to demand that militias made up of former rebels who helped oust dictator Moamer Kadhafi disband and join the army or police.

"Our demands are: dissolve all militias and make their members individually enter the army or police force," activist and law student Bilal Bettamer said.

"And we want all pro-Kadhafi and Kadhafi-era criminals to be removed from the police and army. We want to end this stalemate between the army and militias," he added.

Former rebels who have refused to join the security forces insist that the authorities first purge them of remnants of the Kadhafi regime.

Helicopters and fighter jets flew over the "Benghazi will not die" rally, which came a week after the army deployed units in the city to bolster security.

Banners read: "We want a unified army," and "no more assassinations."

Benghazi has witnessed a series of attacks against police stations and assassinations targeting military officers.

It has also become a focus for jihadist groups, including militants who killed ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans in a September 11 attack on the US consulate.

AFP
Mid-East
-------------------------------------------------
Source URL: http://www.france24.com/en/20121228-hundreds-protest-against-militias-libyas-benghazi