Thursday, September 03, 2009

Preparing for the G20 in Pittsburgh: A Historical Review of the Mellons and the Rise of Monopoly Capitalism

Mellons over Pittsburgh and the planet

By Stephen Millies
Published Aug 8, 2009 3:16 PM

The Rockefeller and Du Pont billionaire dynasties are hated around the world. Outside of Pennsylvania the super rich Mellon family isn’t as well known.

They should be. When Fortune magazine listed the eight richest people in the United States in 1957, four of them were Mellons. The family’s crown jewels then included Alcoa Aluminum, Gulf Oil—which merged with Rockefeller’s Chevron in 1984—and the Mellon National Bank.

Alcoa had sales of nearly $27 billion in 2008. Chevron was ten times bigger with sales of $273 billion.

In 2007 the Mellon Bank merged with the Bank of New York to form a financial octopus that operates in 34 countries. Bank of New York vice president Lucy Edwards admitted conspiring to launder more than $7 billion from Russia. (Bloomberg News, July 26, 2006)

The Bank of New York Mellon has $20.7 trillion in assets under custody or administration. That’s $6 trillion more than the entire gross domestic product of the United States.

Yet it still received a bailout of $3 billion while it was supposed to “oversee” the Troubled Assets Relief Program.

Much of the Mellon wealth is locked up in tax-dodging foundations. The Andrew W. Mellon foundation had $6.5 billion in assets in 2007.

Political power went along with this loot. George Bush made Paul O’Neill—the former CEO of Mellon-controlled Alcoa—his first treasury secretary in 2001.

Eighty years earlier, Andrew Mellon had to resign from 51 corporation boards when he became treasury secretary in 1921. Presidents Harding, Coolidge and Hoover took orders from the financier.

Mellon’s reign—the longest of any treasury secretary—extended the misery of the Great Depression. According to Herbert Hoover’s memoirs, Andrew Mellon’s attitude was to “liquidate labor, liquidate stocks, liquidate the farmers.”

“Liquidate labor” is exactly what happened to Pittsburgh where the Mellon fortune originated. Pittsburgh finally recovered from the Depression. But in the early 1980s the area lost 56,000 steel industry jobs and 54,000 other manufacturing jobs. (Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, May 16.)

Deindustrialization has led to 21 percent of Pittsburgh’s total population and a third of its African Americans living under the poverty line. Pittsburgh is where the G-20 summit is being held in September.

A bigoted miser

Founder of the family fortune was Thomas A. Mellon, an immigrant from Ulster who was born in 1813. He took great pride that his ancestors had crossed over from Scotland to Ulster after Oliver Cromwell slaughtered the local Irish population.

Mellon wrote in his autobiography, “It is very manifest that it would have been well for Ireland had this policy of extirpation been carried into effect throughout the entire island.”

This bigot became a lawyer and a loan shark. Mellon lent money at high interest rates and foreclosed on those who couldn’t pay up. He started a real estate empire that benefited from Pittsburgh becoming the steel capital.

By 1860 Thomas Mellon got himself elected judge. Later he wrote that there was nothing wrong with condemned prisoners committing suicide: “This growing tendency of self-destruction ... is not to be discouraged.”

The same year Mellon became a hanging judge Abraham Lincoln was elected president. Over 360,000 Pennsylvanians joined the Union Army to fight the slave masters. Pennsylvania Congressperson Thaddeus Stevens demanded land and freedom for Black people.

Even James Mellon, Thomas Mellon’s second son, wanted to enlist. Judge Mellon was furious. “It is only greenhorns who enlist,” wrote the father to his son. “There are plenty of other lives less valuable.”

It is “less valuable” workers who continue to fill Veterans Administration hospitals and military cemeteries.

The Mellon fortune takes off

As soon as his judgeship ended, Thomas Mellon opened a private bank on Jan. 2, 1870, on Smithfield Street. “T. Mellon & Sons’ Bank” had to close its doors during the 1873 crisis but reopened in a few months.

It was Thomas’s son Andrew who really sent the Mellon fortune into orbit. Daddy Mellon was already financing Henry Clay Frick and swindling farmers out of their land that lay over valuable coal deposits.

Like Wall Street’s J.P. Morgan, who started General Electric and U.S. Steel, Andrew Mellon began organizing corporations.

Charles Martin Hall discovered how to separate alumina from bauxite rock at the same time French inventor Paul Heroult did so.

Joining forces with metallurgist Alfred E. Hunt, they turned to the Mellon Bank seeking money to exploit Hall’s invention. In 1888 the Mellons financed the Pittsburgh Reduction Company—now called Alcoa—keeping 40 percent of the stock for themselves.

Hall’s U.S. patent—not recognized in Europe—and high tariffs gave Alcoa an absolute monopoly on aluminum in the Unites States until World War II.

But oil provided even more profits than aluminum. The Mellons were able to take over the fabulous Spindletop oilfield in Texas to form Gulf Oil.

After Andrew Mellon left the Treasury, he became U.S. ambassador to Britain. He demanded and got 50 percent of any oil found in Kuwait, which was then a British colony.

Sixty years later U.S. imperialism went to war with Iraq to protect Gulf Oil’s stake in Kuwait.


The Mellon family war against workers

Coal mines and machine guns

By Stephen Millies
Published Aug 17, 2009 6:50 PM

“You could not run a coal company without machine guns,” sums up the Mellon style of labor relations.

Richard Mellon broke the United Mine Workers union at the family’s Pittsburgh Coal Company in 1925. Three years later the U.S. Senate’s Interstate Commerce Committee traveled to Pittsburgh to question this strike-breaking brother of Treasury Secretary Andrew Mellon.

They asked Richard Mellon about the machine guns of Pennsylvania’s Coal and Iron Police, a notorious private strike-breaking outfit that functioned like Blackwater (now named XE) mercenaries do. Mellon answered, “It is necessary. You could not run without them.”

While Mellon was testifying, his coal bosses had been told to “keep our police in the background.” Eleven months later on Feb. 9, 1929, they beat union miner John Barkoski to death. Union supporter John Philipovich was shot to death on the porch of his store.

Much bloodier were the East St. Louis, Ill., race riots in 1917. Two thousand workers had gone on strike there at the Mellon-controlled Aluminum Ore Company plant. Unionists were conducting organizing drives at other local plants.

Mellon and other employers recruited thousands of African Americans from the South with false promises of employment. Whites were told that Black workers were going to take their jobs. The strike at Mellon’s plant was broken.

Unlike future Communist leader William Z. Foster, who was then organizing African-American and white meatpacking workers in Chicago’s stockyards, the white AFL union leaders in East St. Louis catered to racism.

These misleaders demanded Black workers be driven out of the city while local newspapers printed lurid, lying stories of a Black “crime wave.”

This deliberate instigation of racism led to a mob of thousands of armed whites hunting Black people on the streets on July 2, 1917. W.E.B. Du Bois estimated in his autobiography that 125 African Americans were murdered then.

Years before railroad tycoon Jay Gould bragged he could “hire half of the working class to shoot the other half.” Big capitalists became experts at pitting one group of workers against another.

The anger of white and U.S.-born workers against their bosses would often be diverted into hatred for African Americans, Latinas/os and immigrants.

Mellons are again today involved in attacking the working class and oppressed—this time in the debate on health care. Right-wing groups are conducting a vicious fight against any reforms of a rotten system where nearly 50 million people are uninsured. One of the biggest backers of the tax-free foundations leading this smear campaign is Richard Mellon Scaife, whose fortune is an estimated $1.2 billion.

Bayoneting workers

Family patriarch Thomas A. Mellon hated unions. He called union leaders “labor parasites” who were “promoters of socialism and anarchy.”

In 1880 Thomas Mellon busted a strike at the Waverly Coal Coke Company, which he partially owned. Mellon even had union leader David Jones prosecuted on “criminal conspiracy” charges for seeking to fix the price of labor!

Andrew Mellon’s friend and financial partner Henry Clay Frick broke the Homestead steel strike in 1892. Workers at Andrew Carnegie’s steel plant outside Pittsburgh had driven out Pinkerton private police thugs.

The 1892 presidential campaign receded into the background as the whole country focused on the long strike. Frick was so hated that anarchist Alexander Berkman tried to kill him. Berkman spent 14 years in prison for his deed.

It took the whole summer and 8,000 Pennsylvania National Guard troops to finally break the strike. Not until 45 years later in 1937 did the workers at Homestead win a union.

Alcoa workers spent decades winning a union. The Industrial Workers of the World led a 1913 strike at the company’s New Kensington plant, 18 miles northeast of Pittsburgh. Women armed themselves with blacksnake whips and lashed strikebreakers.

After six weeks of state troopers attacking picket lines, the workers had to settle for promises of arbitration.

Two years later in 1915 workers revolted at the Mellon’s Massena, N.Y., aluminum mill. Anticipating the sit-down strikes of the 1930s, they captured every section of the big plant while management fled.

St. Lawrence County Sheriff Thaddeus Day deputized a gang of businessmen to break the strike. New York state Gov. Whitman sent in two companies of the National Guard who bayoneted workers. They killed strike leader Joseph Solunski, who died in an Ogdensburg hospital on Aug. 2, 1915.

Aluminum Workers Local 19256 finally compelled the company to sign a contract in 1941.

In 1919 William Z. Foster led a national steel strike against the 12-hour day that was drowned in police violence. Members of Troop D of the Pennsylvania State Constabulary assaulted workers at Mellon’s Standard Steel Company plant outside Butler, Pa.

As terrible as the conditions in these U.S. plants were, workers were treated even worse in Mellon’s aluminum trust mines in Guyana, Surinam, Jamaica and Guinea.

Sources: “Mellon’s Millions” by Harvey O’Connor; “Mellon” by David Cannadine; Report of the National Advisory Commission on Civil Disorders, also known as the “Kerner Commission.”


The Mellons: Keeping Pittsburgh poor

By Stephen Millies
Published Aug 23, 2009 8:46 PM

Pittsburgh made the Mellons rich. The city was hell for workers.

A 12-hour day was standard in the steel mills.

Five hundred twenty-six workers were killed on the job in Allegheny County, which includes Pittsburgh, between July 1, 1906, and June 30, 1907.

Sixty percent of women workers earned less than $7 per week, according to the “Pittsburgh Survey,” a pioneering sociological study.

Pittsburgh had the highest death rate from typhoid fever in the country, since the water wasn’t even filtrated until 1907. Children suffered the worst. Between 1900 and 1907, an average of 226 out of 1,000 babies died before their first birthday.

This misery mattered to the Mellons about as much as the Johnstown, Pa., flood did.

Henry Clay Frick established the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club for Pittsburgh’s wealthy elite, including steel tycoon Andrew Carnegie. Frick’s friend Andrew Mellon was one of the first members.

On May 31, 1889, the club’s poorly maintained dam broke, pouring out 20 million tons of water that would kill 2,209 people in Johnstown. It conveniently put out of action the Cambria Iron and Steel works, Carnegie’s biggest competitor, for more than a year.

Bighearted Andy Mellon gave $1,000—45 cents per victim—in chump change to the relief fund.

In those “good old days” before successful lawsuits, legal cases against the South Fork Fishing and Hunting Club were thrown out of court. Club member and Mellon family lawyer Philander Knox successfully claimed the Johnstown flood was an “act of God.”

Knox collected his reward by being selected to be a U.S. senator, attorney general and secretary of state. After Panama was stolen to build a canal, Attorney General Knox advised President Teddy Roosevelt, “Do not let so great an achievement suffer from any taint of legality.”

Summoning Black labor to Pittsburgh

The “Great Migration” of African Americans from the South to Pittsburgh started during World War I. The Pittsburgh Courier became one of the most influential Black newspapers in the country.

By August 1917 there were 4,000 Black workers in the U.S. Steel plants around Pittsburgh. Jones and Laughlin Steel employed 1,400 African Americans. A generation later, in 1944, there were 11,500 Black workers in the area’s steel mills.

The dirty and dangerous jobs that African Americans held often gave them a chokehold on production. Steel mills need coke, and apartheid in steel had reserved coke ovens for Black workers.

African Americans at U.S. Steel’s Clairton, Pa., works carried out a series of strikes against discrimination between December 1943 and February 1944. They threatened to idle nearly 30,000 employees by cutting off coke and coal gas.

African-American communist Ben Careathers signed up 2,000 Black workers at J&L in the late 1930s.

In 1943, 450 Black workers at J&L’s Aliquippa plant went on strike after the company refused to upgrade two African Americans. The same year 28 Black firemen at J&L’s South Side Works in Pittsburgh—incensed that white counterparts were earning 11 cents more per hour—shut down the power plant and idled 11,000 workers.

Millions of Black sharecroppers never had the power that thousands of Black steel workers were using against the mightiest corporations in the land.

Urban removal

The Mellons didn’t like this power. Pittsburgh had the worst anti-communist witch hunt.

Ben Careathers and fellow Communist Party members were framed in both state and federal courts on thought-control charges. Steve Nelson, who fought in Spain against fascists, spent two years in jail.

In 1940 the Census counted 90,060 Black people in Allegheny County. Ohio’s Cuyahoga County, which includes Cleveland, had 87,145 African Americans.

By 1970 the Black population in Cuyahoga County had increased more than four times to 351,574. African Americans in Allegheny County saw their numbers increase by only 67 percent, to 150,118.

Why the difference in these two industrial areas just 130 miles apart? No other Black community in a major Northern metropolitan area grew more slowly than Pittsburgh’s. No other metropolitan area is under the thumb of one billionaire family—the Mellons.

“We have saved this city from becoming a Camden or a Gary,” bragged John P. Robin in 1980. The head of the local urban removal authority was actually claiming he prevented Pittsburgh from becoming a Black and Latino/a majority city.

“The philanthropist Richard King Mellon” was described by the New York Times (May 13, 2000) as having led this urban removal campaign, dubbed “Renaissance I.” In the Lower Hill District 1,500 Black families were driven out so an arena and luxury apartments could be built.

One result of this relatively smaller Black community was Local 1199 being thrown back when it tried to organize Pittsburgh’s hospitals in 1970. John Black, a founding member of Workers World Party who died in 2006, was one of the organizers. Even today health-care workers’ wages in Pittsburgh are among the lowest in the country.

Source: “Out of the Crucible, Black Steelworkers in Western Pennsylvania, 1875-1980,” by Dennis C. Dickerson


The Mellons: Blood, oil and profits

By Stephen Millies
Published Aug 30, 2009 11:54 PM

The Mellon fortune drips with blood and oil from every pore.

Gulf Oil Corp. became the biggest gusher of money for the Mellon family empire. By 1956 it was taking $160 million annually in profits out of Kuwait alone.

Violence was a vital ingredient of this stolen wealth. President Barack Obama admitted in his June 4th Cairo speech that “the United States played a role in the overthrow of a democratically elected Iranian government.”

The CIA’s “Operation Ajax” overthrew Iranian Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh in 1953. It was masterminded by CIA executive Kermit Roosevelt, a grandson of President Teddy Roosevelt. Mossadegh’s “crime” was nationalizing his country’s oil.

Iran was plunged into 26 years of dictatorship under the U.S.-imposed Shah. Thousands were tortured to death by the SAVAK secret police, which was modeled on the Nazi Gestapo. SAVAK agents were trained by Herman Norman Schwarzkopf, whose son, Gen. H. Norman Schwarzkopf Jr., led the 1991 U.S. invasion of Iraq.

This was wonderful for the Mellons, since Gulf Oil got a slice of Iranian oil. Kermit Roosevelt left the CIA and became a Gulf Oil vice president.

As in 1953, the U.S. is once again trying to overthrow a “democratically elected Iranian government.” Congress has approved $400 million for a new CIA destabilization campaign.

U.S. billionaires want to overthrow Iranian President Ahmadinejad, just like they got rid of Prime Minister Mossadegh.

It started in Texas

Croatian immigrant Anthony Lucas was convinced there was oil under an East Texas salt dome. Native people had known this for centuries.

Vindication came on Jan. 10, 1901, when the Spindletop gusher began throwing 100,000 barrels of oil into the sky every day. Nearby Beaumont became a boomtown.

The prospector—whose original name was Luchich—was forced to sell seven-eighths of his stake to Pittsburgh oilmen J.M. Guffey and John H. Galey. These oilmen needed more financing from the biggest Pittsburgh moneylenders—the Mellons.

The J.M. Guffey Petroleum Co. was born with a $15 million capitalization. Lucas—who was a classmate of Serbian electrical genius Nikola Tesla—got $400,000. Galey got something. The workers who risked their lives to put out a huge oil fire at Spindletop got nothing.

Guffey was kicked out by the Mellons in 1907 when Gulf Oil was incorporated. Andrew Mellon’s nephew, William Larimer Mellon, was installed as Gulf’s president.

He had organized the Crescent pipeline, which stretched across Pennsylvania. The Mellons sold it to the Rockefellers’ National Transit pipeline in 1895 for $4 million.

W.L. Mellon then organized a Pittsburgh streetcar monopoly in 1901 valued at $110 million. The Mellons were big into trolleys at that time, since it served their real estate interests.

Big Oil later spent decades destroying trolley systems in the interests of promoting the use of gas-guzzling automobiles. The 700-mile-long Pacific Electric system that once served the Los Angeles area shut down its last line to Long Beach in 1961.

Killing people around the world

Gulf Oil’s pipelines extended into Sapulpa, Okla., where oil was stolen from Native people. The prosperous Greenwood neighborhood in nearby Tulsa—called “Black Wall Street”—was destroyed by white racist mobs in 1921, with hundreds of African Americans killed.

The Gulf Oil refinery at Port Arthur, Texas, became the largest in the world in the 1920s. Black and Mexican workers did the dirtiest work there and got only 25 cents per hour.

Twenty-five sailors burned to death when the company’s tanker “Gulf of Venezuela” blew up in Port Arthur in 1926.

By this time Gulf had plenty of oil wells in Venezuela. The Mellons and Rockefellers backed Juan Vicente Gómez, who was the country’s dictator from 1908 until his death in 1935.

Gómez crushed unions and threw student protesters into chain gangs. Presently, democratically elected Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez Frías, with Cuban assistance, has brought health care to millions. Yet the corporate media that today attack President Chávez never even mentioned the dictator Gómez.

Gulf Oil was exploiting Mexico before it began ripping off Venezuela. But the Mellons didn’t like one important anti-imperialist result of the Mexican Revolution. In 1938 all the U.S. and British oil companies were thrown out of that country.

Colombia’s congress rejected concessions to Gulf and Standard Oil in 1928. Mellon lawyer Allen Dulles—who later was to be the CIA head during Mossadegh’s overthrow—was outraged. Colombia was forced to back down when its credit was shut off by Wall Street.

Gen. René Barrientos Ortuño staged a phony 1966 election in Bolivia with $800,000 in Gulf Oil bribes. The next year he and the CIA assassinated the heroic revolutionary, Che Guevara.

But Big Oil has now been kicked out of Bolivia.

Next the Mellons went to the Middle East and Africa. U.S. Ambassador to Britain Andrew Mellon demanded and got half of Kuwait’s oil deposits from its colonial overlords in London.

Gulf Oil was the paymaster for the Portuguese fascist regime’s war against the African people of Angola, Guinea-Bissau and Mozambique.

But African liberation fighters won independence for these countries and their victories also aided the successful struggle against fascism by the Portuguese workers, who overthrew dictator Marcelo Caetano in 1974.

What did working people in Pittsburgh get out of Gulf Oil’s crimes?

When Gulf Oil was taken over by Chevron in 1984, thousands of jobs were lost at its skyscraper headquarters in Pittsburgh. Mellon foundation grants to Carnegie-Mellon University didn’t stop 500 Gulf Oil scientists from being fired.

Sources: “Mellon’s Millions” by Harvey O’Connor and “Paul Mellon: Portrait of an Oil Baron” by William S. Hoffman.


The Mellons: Making people miserable with aluminum

By Stephen Millies
Published Sep 2, 2009 7:18 PM

In 2007 Alcoa’s top boss, Alain Belda, got $25,646,420– nearly a half-million dollars a week. That year the aluminum giant racked up $2.8 billion in profits.

In 2005 workers at Alcoa’s plants in Honduras were making between 68 to 87 cents per hour, according to the International Metalworkers Federation. Alcoa fired all its workers in Honduras when the automotive market plunged in 2008.

In 2001 base pay for the 15,600 Alcoa workers assembling automotive electrical systems in Mexico was $1.20 per hour. Alcoa provoked a work action in Mexico and fired 236 workers. It even sued nine union leaders for $1 million.

This fantastic exploitation of human beings is called imperialism. It’s why people are coming to Pittsburgh in late September to protest the G-20 summit, a gathering of treasury officials and bankers from 20 countries who are plotting how to protect their profits. A National March for Jobs will be held on Sept. 20, which will be followed by a Global Week in Solidarity with the Unemployed.

A 50-year monopoly

Alcoa was founded by the super-rich Mellon family as the Pittsburgh Reduction Company in 1888. Pittsburgh Reduction became the Aluminum Company of America in 1907 and then Alcoa in 1999.

Pittsburgh is also the home of the United Steelworkers union, which represents more than 15,000 Alcoa workers in the U.S. and Canada. The Steelworkers union has endorsed the Sept. 20 Jobs March in Pittsburgh, initiated by the Bail Out the People Movement.

Over the ages, people have learned to use copper, tin, iron and dozens of other metals. It took the Mellons to enforce a 50-year monopoly on aluminum in the United States. They controlled the patents of Charles Hall, who found out how to get alumina from bauxite—aluminum ore—at the same time French inventor Paul Heroult did.

The Cowles brothers, owners of the Electric Smelting & Aluminum Company in Lockport, N.Y., contested Hall’s patent. The brothers claimed that Hall got his ideas from their similar efforts.

But they lost a court battle when federal Judge William Howard Taft ruled for the Pittsburgh Reduction Company and its patents in 1894. Author Harvey O’Connor estimates that Taft’s decision was worth $100 million to the Mellons.

It was a smart decision for Taft, who became a U.S. president and chief justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Taft also served as U.S. Governor-General of the Philippines when hundreds of thousands of Filipinos were massacred.

The Mellons responded to Taft’s decree by jacking up the price of aluminum. After their patents expired, the Mellons used high tariffs to maintain their aluminum monopoly inside the United States. It didn’t hurt that Andrew Mellon was treasury secretary from 1921 to 1932. They also grabbed every bauxite mine.

Prices were kept so high that even Henry Ford complained that he couldn’t afford to use aluminum in his cars. Despite an antitrust suit filed in 1937, Alcoa still controlled 100 percent of all aluminum smelting in the United States as World War II began. They even made half of the country’s aluminum kitchen utensils.

“If America loses this war,” said Interior Secretary Harold Ickes on June 26, 1941, “it can thank the Aluminum Corporation of America.”

The emerging military-industrial complex was forced to break Alcoa’s total monopoly just to get enough aluminum to build planes. A federal court in 1950 carved up production capacity, with Alcoa getting 51 percent, Reynolds 31 percent and Kaiser 18 percent.

Worldwide plunder & strikebreaking in the U.S.

Alcoa also spread misery around the world. Pollutants from the company’s plants in Massena, N.Y., and other industries on the St. Lawrence River have poisoned fish caught downstream by the Mohawk Nation at Akwesasne.

Alcoa came to Suriname, then a Dutch colony, in 1916. During World War II, 75 percent of U.S. bauxite imports came from Suriname. In 1963 Alcoa flooded 600 square miles of Surinamese land when the Afobaka Dam was built. Six thousand Maroons, descendants of escaped

enslaved Africans, were driven out; each was given $3 in compensation.

Alcoa imposed draconian trade policies on other countries as well. Jamaica got only 12 cents per ton for its bauxite. When Jamaican Prime Minister Michael Manley imposed a 7.5 percent levy on the selling price of alumina in 1972, Jamaica’s bauxite revenues increased nine-fold in seven years.

Alcoa retaliated, and Jamaica’s percentage of world bauxite production fell from 27 percent in 1970 to 17 percent in 1975. Production was shifted to Guinea and Australia.

In Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah, first prime minister and then president of the country, planned to industrialize Ghana by harnessing the Volta River. The plan was thwarted by Alcoa. And in 1966 the company’s friends at the CIA overthrew Nkrumah.

Alcoa was also one of the biggest beneficiaries of the 1965 coup in Indonesia, in which a million people were killed.

The company also brutalized U.S. workers. The New York National Guard broke a 1915 strike at Alcoa’s Massena works and bayoneted strike leader Joseph Solunski to death. In appreciation, Alcoa plant manager Charles Moritz tried to give each guardsman a set of aluminum cooking utensils.

In 1917 an Alcoa subsidiary sparked the race riots in East St. Louis, Ill., in which at least 125 African Americans were murdered.

Workers at Alcoa, Tennessee went on strike in 1934 and 1937, where two strikers were killed. This company town had a segregated neighborhood for Black people.

Only in 1941 were many of Alcoa’s plants organized. The Steelworkers won recognition at the Cressona, Penn., plant in October 2008.

Sources: “Mellon’s Millions” by Harvey O’Connor; “Alcoa’s High Tech Sweatshop in Mexico” by Charles Kernaghan, published by the National Labor Committee.

Next: Mellon’s million-dollar lie machine.

Part 1: Mellons over Pittsburgh and the planet
Part 2: Coal mines and machine guns
Part 3: Keeping Pittsburgh poor
Part 4: Blood, oil and profits
Part 5: Making people miserable with aluminum
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Articles copyright 1995-2009 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Page printed from:
http://www.workers.org/2009/us/mellons_0910/

South African Police Commissioner Says Criminals Greedy But Not Racist

JOHANNESBURG 2 September 2009 Sapa

CRIMINALS GREEDY BUT NOT RACIST: CELE

Criminals do not target people because of their skin colour,
national police commissioner Bheki Cele said on Wednesday.

"Criminals in South Africa... they look at what you have, rather
than looking at your face," Cele said at a Southern African
Regional Police Chiefs Co-operation Organisation meeting in
Johannesburg.

He was reacting to a decision by Canadian authorities to grant
South African Brandon Huntley refugee status for alleging that the
government could not protect white South Africans from criminal
attacks by "African South Africans".

"My house was broken into and some stuff was taken... and I
remain black. Surely, my house was never broken into because I am
black," said Cele.

Huntley told immigration officials in Canada that black people
had attacked him on seven different occasions and that white people
were not safe in South Africa.

He did not lay any charges with the police after any of the
incidents, The Star newspaper reported on Wednesday.

"I've opened people's eyes," Huntley told the daily.

Canadian authorities granted him refugee status, to the ire of
the ruling African National Congress.

The South African government was not asked to make any
presentation in the case.

The chairman of the board who made the decision, William Davis,
ruled that Huntley "was a victim because of his race rather than a
victim of criminality".

"The evidence... shows a picture of indifference and inability
or unwillingness of the government and the security forces to
protect white South Africans from persecution by African South
Africans," said Davis.

Home affairs spokesman Ronnie Mamoepa said the decision was
based on "absolute rubbish", while the ANC described it as racist.


JOHANNESBURG 2 September 2009 Sapa-dpa

NEWS FEATURE: BLACK SA CRIME VICTIM SAYS BLACKS ALSO "PERSECUTED"

Thuli Ndlovu doesn't buy the claim of fellow South African,
Brandon Huntley, the country's first-known "crime refugee", that he
was singled out by criminals because he was white.

Canada's refugee authorities sensationally granted Huntley's
refugee status in August after accepting his assertion that he was
marked by criminals in South Africa because of his skin colour and
that the South African state was unwilling or unable to protect
him.

Cape Town native Huntley, 31, applied for refugee status last
year after his work permit ran out. Huntley said he had been mugged
and stabbed during several attempted robberies and been called a
"white dog" or "settler" by his "African South African" attackers.

The immigration and refugee board found "clear and convincing
proof" that Huntley was a "victim of his race rather than a victim
of criminality" and of an "indifference and inability, or
unwillingness, of the government and security forces to protect
white South Africans from persecution by African South Africans."

The ruling has caused a firestorm of controversy in South
Africa, which has a well-documented violent crime problem but where most of the victims are not whites, but poor blacks, whose stories go unnoticed.

Like Thuli, a 36-year-old tour guide and social worker from
Soweto township outside Johannesburg. "First it was my auntie," she
says, listing off the victims of violent crime in her family.

Thuli's aunt used to run a shebeen (unlicensed tavern) from her
home in eastern Johannesburg. It was there Makhosi was gunned down in front of her two children and patrons in the early hours of one
Sunday morning in 2000.

"I think they were trying to rob here but something went wrong
and they shot her," Thuli says.

The family were still mourning Makhosi, when four months later,
on a Lenten Good Friday, they were back at the graveside, burying
Thuli's brother.

Thokozani Ndlovu, 24, was attacked by two unknown men while
returning home to his pregnant fiance in Soweto from his job in a
bottle shop one evening.

They took his cellphone and wallet and, when he fought back,
pumped his head, chest and stomach with bullets. After his death,
his fiancee suffered a miscarriage.

And then there was Thuli's own brush with death in 1998 when she
was walking from the bus to her backyard home in another part of
Soweto.

After being robbed at gunpoint of her phone, money, watch, ring,
even earrings, she was shot twice for trying to get away, fearing
the next stage was rape.

After six months in hospital she was back on her feet, but one
bullet is still lodged in her spine and beeps when she passes
through metal detectors. No one was ever arrested in connection
with the murders. "They said they didn't have any lead," she said.

Understandably, Thuli disagrees with Huntley's claim that whites
are being singled out by criminals.

"They want what you have, whether you're what or black. It's
about unemployment (of 27.9 per cent)," she says with a resigned
air.

The South African government said it was "disgusted" at the
ruling which the ruling African National Congress called "racist."
Human rights groups, including the South African Institute of
Race Relations (SAIRR) and South African Human Rights Commission, also rubbished Huntley's claims of persecution.

"While South Africa is a very violent society the vast majority
of the victims of violent crime are black," SAIRR noted.

Whites, who make up 9 per cent of the population of 49.3
million, are generally safer because they can afford to pay for
private security, SAIRR deputy president Frans Cronje said,
referring to the legions of private security guards that watch over
the homes of the wealthy.

While a racial motive was sometimes detected in crimes, there
was no "general pattern of racial attacks on white South Africans
by black South Africans," SAIRR said.

And the racism, as the CEO of the Human Rights Commission
Tseliso Thipanyane points out, cuts both ways.

Unions representing white farmers in South Africa allege a
racial motive to the high number of violent farm attacks, but a
number of attacks by trigger-happy white farmers on farmworkers or
community members in recent years have also smacked of racism.

Popular reaction continued to pour in to radio phone-in
programmes and internet sites Wednesday, with most condemning
Huntley but a few saluting him for highlighting the crime scourge.

"I've opened people's eyes," Huntley told Johannesburg's The
Star newspaper.

Wednesday, September 02, 2009

Kwame Nkrumah: Pan-Africanist, Socialist and Revolutionary

Kwame Nkrumah: Pan-Africanist, Socialist and Revolutionary

Posted by rowlandkeshena on May 25, 2009

In celebration of this years 51st African Liberation Day I am re-posting this biography of African revolutionary leader Kwame Nkrumah.

Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah, or simply Kwame Nkrumah was born September 21st, 1909. He would become one of the most influential pan-Africanists, socialists and revolutionaries in the world, as well as the first leader of independent Ghana, and before that, its predecessor state, the Gold Coast.

In 1909, Madam Nyaniba gave birth to Francis Nwia Kofi Ngonloma in Nkroful, Gold Coast, a British Colony in the west of Africa. Nkrumah graduated from the Achimota School in Accra in 1930, later studying for the Roman Catholic Seminary and teaching at the Catholic school in Axim. In 1935 he decided to leave Ghana for the United States. In the United States he received his BA from Lincoln University in 1939, where he was also pledged to the Mu Chapter of Phi Beta Sigma Fraternity. He continued his academic studies in 1942, receiving his STB (Bachelor of Sacred Theology).

He also went on to earn a Master of Science in education from the University of Pennsylvania, also 1942, and a Master of Arts in philosophy the following year. While lecturing in political science at Lincoln he was elected president of the African Students Organization of America and Canada. As an undergraduate at Lincoln he participated in at least one student theater production and published an essay on European government in Africa in the student newspaper,The Lincolnian.

Over the course of his studies in the US, Nkrumah visited and preached in black Presbyterian Churches in Philadelphia and New York City, as well as read books on politics and divinity. It was during this time that he encountered the ideas of of pioneering pan-Africanist and black revolutionary Marcus Garvey. He also had a job tutoring fellow students in philosophy. Also at this time, in 1943, he met the Afro-Trinidadian Marxist and Trotskyist C.L.R. James. He would later describe how it was from James that he learnt how an underground movement worked.

Following his stint in the US he left for London, England, arriving in May 1945. He had intended to study at the London School of Economics, however, after meeting with George Padmore, another influential Afro-Trinidadian Marxist, he decided to help organize the Fifth Pan-African Congress in Manchester. After that he founded the West African National Secretariat to work for the decolonization of Africa. He also became Vice-President of the West African Students’ Union.

He was invited to serve as the General Secretary to the United Gold Coast Convention in fall, 1947 under Joseph B. Danquah. This convention had the intention of exploring paths to independence for the then British Colony of the Gold Coast (now Ghana). Nkrumah accepted the position and left immediately to return to his native home. After a series of brief stops in Sierra Leone, Liberia, and the Ivory Coast, he arrived in the Gold Coast in December 1947.

In February, 1948 the colonial police fired upon a protest being lead by ex-African servicemen. They were protesting the rapidly rising cost of living. The shooting itself went onto spur a series of riots across the capital of Accra, as well as Kumasi and elsewhere. The British authorities suspected the UGCC to have behind the protests and therefore took action by arresting Nkrumah and the other leading members of the movement. The imperialists soon realised their error, that the UGCC and Nkrumah had not been responsible for the riots, but it was already to late, for after his imprisonment by the colonial government, he emerged as the primary leader of the Ghanaian independence youth movement in 1948.

After his release from imperialist imprisonment, Nkrumah decided to journey around the country of his native country by way of hitch-hiking. In community after community that he visited he would proclaim that the Gold Coast needed self-government. On the basis of his community to community travels he was able to build a large base of support towards the cause of self-determination. Many rushed to his cause, such as the rural cocoa farmers who disagreed with British policy concerning the containment of swollen shoot disease. He also appealed greatly to women to become a part of the political process. This was at a time when women’s suffrage was new to, even to Western ‘Democracy’. His movement also found allies amongst working-class organisations, such as the unions. By 1949 he had coalesced these diverse groups into a new political party: The Convention People’s Party.

The British, who were making moves towards self-government for the Gold Coast, called for the drafting of a New Constitution that would grant local authorities some responsibility for policy decisions. The new constitution, which was drawn up under the influence of the Ghanaian national bourgeoisie, made wage and property requirements were the basis for suffrage. In opposition to this Nkrumah brought together his own “People’s Assembly” composed of representatives of party members, youth organizations, trade unions, farmers, and veterans. In contrast to the new bourgeoisie constitution, their proposals called for universal suffrage without property qualifications, a separate house of chiefs, and self-governing status under the Statute of Westminster. These amendments, known as the Constitutional Proposals of October 1949, were rejected by the colonial administration.

The colonial administration’s rejection of the People’s Assembly’s recommendations led directly to Nkrumah’s call for “Positive Action” in January 1950. His idea of Positive Action included civil disobedience, non-cooperation, boycotts, and strikes. In response the imperialist administration again arrested Nkrumah and many of his supporters in the CPP. Nkrumah was sentenced to three years in prison.

Under the ever increasing weight of both international protests and internal resistance, the British decided to pull out of the Gold Coast. They organized the first general election to be held in Africa under universal franchise; it was held on 5-10 February, 1951. Though in jail, Nkrumah won the election by a landslide, with the CPP taking 34 out of 38 elected seats in the Legislative Assembly.

On 12 February Nkrumah was released from prison, and on the 13th was summoned by the British Governor Charles Arden-Clarke and asked to form a government. On 20 February the new Legislative Assembly met, with Nkrumah as Leader of Government Business and E.C. Quist as President of the Assembly. A year later, on 10 March 1952, the constitution was amended to provide for a Prime Minister, and on 21 March Nkrumah was elected to that post by a secret ballot in the Assembly, 45 to 31, with eight abstentions. On 10 July 1953 he presented his “Motion of Destiny” to the Assembly, which approved it. The motion requested independence within the British Commonwealth “as soon as the necessary constitutional arrangements are made”.

As the leader of Ghana during the transition to independence he was faced with three major challenges: firstly he needed to learn the art of government on the job, secondly he needed to create a unified nation of Ghana from the four territories of the Gold Coast and finally he needed to win his nation’s independence.

On March 6, 1957, at 12 am, Nkrumah declared Ghana to be an independent nation. In celebration and in respect he was given the title of Osagyefo by the people, which translates roughly as “redeemer” or “the victorious one” in the Akan tongue.

On the same date three years later he introduced proposed constitutional changes, primarily that Ghana become a republic. In a truly revolutionary and internationalist move, the new set of proposals also called for the eventual surrender of Ghana’s sovereignty to a federal union of African states. On 19, 23, and 27 April 1960 a presidential election and plebiscite on the constitution were held. The constitution was ratified and Nkrumah elected president. Nkrumah was awarded the Lenin Peace Prize by the Soviet Union and Ghana also became a charter member of the Organization of African Unity in 1963.

While the Gold Coast was already one of the most wealthy and socially advanced territories in Africa, with schools, railways, hospitals, social security and an advanced economy. Under Nkrumah’s leadership, Ghana took steps towards a more socialist state. Nkrumah created a welfare system, started various community programs, and established schools. He ordered the construction of roads and bridges to further commerce and communication. In the interest of the nation’s health, he had tap water systems installed in the villages and ordered the construction of concrete drains for latrines.

In terms of his own personal politics, Nkrumah considered himself to be a non-aligned Marxist. He believed that the malign effects of capitalism and imperialism were going to stay with the newly independent states of Africa for a long time thereafter.

He was clear on distancing his Marxist socialism from the so-called “African socialism” of many of his contemporaries, such as Julius Nyerere of Tanzania and Ahmed Sékou Touré of Guinea. He argued that socialism was the system that would best accommodate the changes that capitalism had brought, while he still respected African values. His main piece articulating the differences between his Marxist socialism and African Socialism was “African Socialism Revisited”. In it he says:

“We know that the traditional African society was founded on principles of egalitarianism. In its actual workings, however, it had various shortcomings. Its humanist impulse, nevertheless, is something that continues to urge us towards our all-African socialist reconstruction. We postulate each man to be an end in himself, not merely a means; and we accept the necessity of guaranteeing each man equal opportunities for his development. The implications of this for socio-political practice have to be worked out scientifically, and the necessary social and economic policies pursued with resolution. Any meaningful humanism must begin from egalitarianism and must lead to objectively chosen policies for safeguarding and sustaining egalitarianism. Hence, socialism. Hence, also, scientific socialism.”

However, it is probably not for his socialism that he was best known, and best remembered for, but rather for being a pioneering advocate of pan-Africanism. He was inspired deeply by his interactions by his fore fathers in the field, people like Marcus Garvey, W.E.B. DuBois, George Padmore and C.L.R. James. Nkrumah would himself go onto inspire and encourage Pan-Africanist positions amongst a number of other African independence leaders and activists from the African diaspora, with perhaps Nkrumah’s biggest success in this area coming with his significant influence in the founding of the Organization of African Unity.

Towards this end he created the All-African People’s Revolutionary Party with the goal of creating and managing the political economic conditions necessary to the emergence of an All-African People’s Revolutionary Army. The A-APRA would the Africa-wide struggle against settler colonialism, Zionism, neo-colonialism, imperialism and all other forms of capitalist oppression and exploitation. The A-APRP still exists to this day, based out of Ghana, but with branches in many countries around Africa, the Caribbean, North America and Europe.

In February 1966 while he was away on a state visit to Vietnam, his government was overthrown in a CIA backed military coup. Following this, Nkrumah would never again return to Ghana, but nevertheless he continued to push for his vision of African unity from elsewhere. In particular he spent much of his exile in Conakry, Guinea, where he was the guest of Ahmed Sékou Touré, who made him honorary co-president of Guinea. He spent his time reading, writing, corresponding, gardening, and entertaining guests. Despite his retirement from public office, his fear of western intelligence agencies did not abate.

In August, 1971, with failing health he was medevaced to to Bucharest, Romania. In April, 1972 he passed away from skin cancer at the age of 62. He was buried in Ghana in a tomb (which is still present) at the village of his birth, Nkroful, but his remains were later transferred to a large national memorial tomb and park in Accra.

Today, Nkrumah is still one of the most respected leaders in African history. His legacy lives on today in the continued existence of the All-African People’s Revolutionary Party, still based out of his home of Ghana, but also in other radical pan-Africanists and socialists such as the African People’s Socialist Party and the International People’s Democratic Uhuru Movement, both of which are based out of the United States.

So on this 51st celebration of African Liberation Day, let us remember not just Osagyefo Kwame Nkrumah, but all the others who have struggled in Africa for liberation, and also those who have struggled around the world. Rest in Uhuru.

Shut-Off By DTE Energy: Moratorium NOW! Press Statement on the Plight of the Residents at Highland Towers

For Immediate Release

Press Statement on the Plight of Residents at the Highland Towers on Woodward Avenue

Event: Organizing Meeting to Declare Economic State of Emergency in Michigan
Location: Central United Methodist Church, Saturday, Sept. 12, 11:00am
Sponsors: Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop Foreclosures, Evictions, Utilty Shut-offs
Contact: 313.671.3715 or 887.4344
e-mail: moratorium@moratorium-mi.org
URL: http://moratorium-mi.org

Highland Towers Residents Left in the Dark by DTE; Children, Seniors, Infirm Imperiled;
Demand a Moratorium on Foreclosures, Evictions and Utility Shut-offs Now!

Members of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition to Stop Foreclosures, Evictions and Utility Shut-offs deplores the actions of DTE Energy for shutting off the electricity and natural gas services at the Highland Towers apartments located on Woodward avenue near Glendale in Highland Park, Michigan. This action by the major power company in metropolitan Detroit has endangered the lives and well-being of hundreds of residents.

According to DTE Energy, the owners of the building owed tens of thousands of dollars in back payments claiming financial difficulties. However, this was not the responsiblity of the residents who had paid their rents in which the cost of utilities were included. This respresents a growing problem in the metro Detroit area as slum landlords refuse to pay bills leaving tenants, who are unaware of the difficulties, facing power cuts and evictions without notice.

Inside the Highland Towers there are children, people with disabilities and those suffering from serious medical conditions. At least one dialysis patient resides in the building. When a representative of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition visited the building on September 1, residents were shocked and overwhelmed. One elderly man walked out into the street and laid down before oncoming traffic. He was soon retreived by residents of the building before a bus drove through the lane.

This situation and others throughout the city and region illustrates the failure of city, county, state and federal government agencies to protect the health and lives of the population. DTE Energy has refused to impose a moratorium on utility shut-offs despite the deaths of four people in June in northwest Detroit and the current situation involving the residents of Highland Towers in Highland Park.

The Moratorium NOW! Coalition is calling on the people to come out to an organizing meeting on September 12 to demand that Governor Granholm declare an economic state of emergency in Michigan and consequently impose moratoriums on foreclosures, evictions and utility-shutoffs. This meeting will be held at the Central United Methodist Church, located on Woodward and Adams in downtown Detroit on Saturday, September 12 beginning at 11:00 a.m.

The city of Detroit is facing a near 30% unemployment rate, while hundreds of thousands more are under threat of eviction and the shut-off of their utility services and water. This represents a state of emergency for the millions of residents of the state and should be acted upon immediately. Failure to take corrective action is endangering the health and welfare of people throughout Michigan.

Interim Mayor Dave Bing has demonstrated his total disdain for the working people of Detroit by proposing massive lay-offs and service cuts including the large-scale reduction in bus services. The city lay-offs and cuts in transportation will only create more foreclosures, evictions, utility shut-offs and job losses. Make no mistake about it, Bing is not working for the people of Detroit but for the banks and corporations whose policies have created the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Only the people organized into a mass movement can mobilize the energy and resources to fight the banks, corporations and their paid agents in government. The thousands of people who came out to public hearings to oppose the bus service cuts during the week of August 24 represent the true face of the people of this city. Bing represents the thieves of Wall Street who only wish to push the people backwards and exploit them even further.

Members of the Moratorium NOW! Coalition are available for comment at the numbers listed above.

Letters Requested for U.S. Political Prisoner Jalil Abdul Muntaqim's Parole Hearing in September 2009

Jalil's 2009 Parole Hearing

Jalil is asking that we write letters supporting his September 2009 parole. Please address the letter to the Parole Commissioners (Re: Parole application of Anthony Jalil Bottom #77A4283) but send to:
NYC Jericho, PO Box 1272, New York, NY 10013

The more personal and individual your letter is, the better. You can write about visiting or communicating with Jalil, or if you haven't been in direct touch with him, you can write about the articles you've read by him or any other knowledge you have of his activities while in prison. Please say that you are aware of the case for which he is serving his sentence. You can also talk about your own perspective - for example, if you are a teacher, you know how valuable it is that Jalil has counseled young prisoners. Any particular slant you can give to your assertion that he will be an excellent candidate for release can give the letter more force.

Some of Jalil's achievements while incarcerated:

In 1986, Mr. Bottom drafted a legislative bill for New York State prisoners to obtain good time off their sentence. The bill was submitted and introduced into the New York State Assembly - Committee on Corrections by former Assemblyman Arthur O. Eve.

In 1994, while incarcerated at Shawangunk Correctional Facility, Mr. Bottom established the first Men's Council in the United States prison. His efforts were featured on television in Japan and written about in the NY Times. During this period, he also graduated from SUNY New Paltz with a B.S. in Psychology and a B.A. in Sociology. Instead of resting on his success, he taught African Studies to a group of prisoners.

On two occasions, he received commendations from prison officials for quelling potential prison riots, one in the mess hall at Great Meadow Correctional Facility and another time in the auditorium at Greenhaven Correctional Facility.

From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Bottom was the office manager of the prison computer lab at Eastern Correctional Facility. His duties consisted of teaching prisoners keyboarding skills and how to use computer software programs. Despite his busy schedule, he found the time to raise money from inmate accounts to support the charitable Children's Funds.

In 1999, in Auburn Correctional Facility, Mr. Bottom established sociology, poetry, and legal research and discussion classes under the auspices of the Lifer's Committee that he chaired.

Mr. Bottom co-sponsored the Victory Gardens Project, a program in which farmers in Maine grew tons of fresh produce for distribution to poor urban communities in New York, New Jersey and Boston, Massachusetts. In the four years of its existence, the Project distributed nearly 10,000 pounds of fresh produce in urban centers.

In response to the tragedy of September 11, 2001, while in Auburn Correctional Facility, Mr. Bottom proposed raising funds from inmates to donate to the American Red Cross. Former Deputy Superintendent of Programs, R. Nelson acknowledged Anthony's efforts in a memorandum.

While in Auburn Correctional Facility he worked as a Pre-GED Teacher's Assistant, earned a vocational certificate for Architectural Drafting. Mr. Bottom has proposed and gained the approval for a Life Skills Program for inmates.

Mr. Bottom is a published poet and essayist; his writings are found in several University sponsored books of compilations of prison writers. He has also written an unpublished novel and teleplay.

To read about Jalil's parole release plans, go to the following URL http://www.freejalil.com

Free All Political Prisoners!
nycjericho@gmail.com • http://www.jerichony.org

September 20-25: A Global Week of Solidarity With the Unemployed, Surrounding the G20 Summit in Pittsburgh

A Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed

September 20 - 25

(During the G-20 Summit in Pittsburgh)

Yes to Jobs & Human Needs; No to War & Wall Street Greed

Sunday, September 20 - Rally & March for a Real Jobs Program
Building a Tent City in Pittsburgh for the Unemployed & Supporters the weekend before the G-20 Summit

Organizing Caravans of Unemployed People and Supporters to

Converge on Pittsburgh during the week of September 19-26
Marches, Protests and Events Before and During the G20 Summit addressing demands such as: Bring the Troops Home from Iraq & Afghanistan Now! & Free Mumia Abu-Jamal, World-Renown Political Prisoner, Journalist, Activists and 'Voice of the Voiceless!"

In September the eyes of the world will be on Pittsburgh, where the G20 countries will meet to consider what to do about the biggest global economic crisis since the 1930s. The heads of governments, finance ministers and central bankers that will be in Pittsburgh for the summit hear the concerns of bankers and corporate executives all the time. They need to listen to the voices of the millions of people who have lost their jobs and their homes because of the crisis. The Bail out the People Movement, a coalition of community, labor, religious, and grassroots activists, wants to help dramatize the crisis of joblessness, and the need for action both in the U.S. and worldwide to the G20 summit. It is now clear that the stimulus legislation passed by the U.S. Congress in March has done little to stop the loss of jobs. There is no recovery for the unemployed, the underemployed and the poor; and things are only getting worse. This is why we’re asking you to help make the idea of a Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed from September 19 through September 26, the week of the G20 Summit, a reality.

A TENT CITY AND MARCH FOR JOBS On Sunday, Sept. 20, the tent city will open with a rally and march for jobs. The main site for the tent city will be next to the Monumental Baptist Church in an historic section of the African-American community of Pittsburgh called “The Hill.” This location is just a short walk or march from the convention center where the G20 summit will be held, and from the rest of downtown Pittsburgh. Unemployed people and their supporters will inhabit the tent city from Sept 20 through Sept. 25. Additional locations for other encampments in Pittsburgh are being considered as well. This is why we’re asking you to help make the idea of a Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed from September 19 through September 26, the week of the G20 Summit, a reality.

IF YOU ARE STRUGGLING TO SURVIVE – THIS IS A WEEK OF SOLIDARITY WITH YOU The Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed is also a week of solidarity with those who have lost their homes to foreclosures and evictions; those who have been forced to take part-time or temporary jobs because there are no full-time jobs; workers who have seen their wages and hours cut; autoworkers whose plants have been closed; immigrant workers who are fighting for their rights; communities that are fighting gentrification and budget cuts to social programs; students who are being forced out of school because of the debt burden and rising tuition cost; the survivors and displaced victims of the Katrina/Rita hurricanes and the government's criminally negligent response; poor and working people everywhere, especially in poor countries who are bearing the cruel brunt of the economic crisis; workers everywhere fighting for the right to organize and in the U.S. for passage of the Employee Free Choice Act in the U.S.; All who need single payer health care; retirees who need their healthcare & pensions safeguarded; and young people, especially Black and Latina/o youths whom the system has condemned to a jobless future.

IT’S TIME TO BAILOUT THE UNEMPLOYED WITH A REAL JOBS PROGRAM In the days before and during the G20 summit, events and marches will take place to emphasize this central point: More than just another stimulus package is needed. It’s time for a serious, direct and massive jobs program on par with the Works Progress Administration of the 1930s. We must fight for a real jobs program for the unemployed and underemployed that pays a living wage performing socially meaningful work; and an income for those unable to work. Any claim that the resources for a serious jobs program are not available must be rejected. If governments, particularly the U.S. government, can make available trillions of dollars for bailing out banks and corporations as well as funding the Pentagon’s endless wars, & Occupations, they can find the resources to bail out the unemployed and underemployed.

THIS IS A GLOBAL CALL BECAUSE JOBLESSNESS IS A GLOBAL CRISIS Mass unemployment is a global phenomenon. The right to a job at a living wage must be a global demand. Instead of being pitted against each other, unemployed and working people across the world can only improve their conditions by working and fighting together for their common interests. Activists and organizations everywhere are encouraged to support the Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed and organize events in conjunction with it.

DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING'S FINAL CAUSE: THE RIGHT OF ALL TO A JOB OR AN INCOME The need and the right of everyone to either a job or a guaranteed income is the cause that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. dedicated the last year of his life to. The present global economic depression has made King’s last cause even more urgent today than it was when he was alive. Dr. King also knew that: no matter the magnitude of suffering, governments do not respond if those who are suffering remain invisible and silent. Even a history-making president like Obama is still not a substitute for the mass movement for social justice. During the depression of the 1930’s, President Franklyn Delano Roosevelt once told labor leaders who were asking him to do more to help workers and the poor “I agree with you, know make me do it”. FDR’s advice applies to Pres. Obama to. The purpose of the Global Week of Solidarity with the Unemployed is to make sure that people who are usually ignored are seen and heard.

ORGANIZING CARAVANS OF UNEMPLOYED PEOPLE AND SUPPORTERS TO PITTSBURGH Over the next 10 weeks, organizing will be going on in every region of the country to bring caravans of unemployed people and supporters to Pittsburgh in Sept.

THINGS THAT YOU CAN DO TO HELP:

Have your Union/Community/Religious or Student Organization.endorse - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20endorse.shtml
Donate to help with organizing expenses - http://bailoutpeople.org/donate.shtml
Organize car/s vans/ trucks & buses from your locality to participate in the caravans to Pittsburgh - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20volorgcents.shtml
Have an Organizer address a meeting of your organization - http://bailoutpeople.org/cmnt.shtml
Volunteer your time to work on this project - http://www.bailoutpeople.org/septg20volorgcents.shtml
Bail Out the People Movement
Solidarity Center
55 W. 17th St. #5C
New York, NY 10011
212.633.6646
http://www.BailOutPeople.org
Email: bailoutpeople.org/cmnt.shtml

South African Population Increases to 48.7 Million

SA population increases to 48,7m

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA
Sep 02 2009 12:07

South Africa's population increased from 45,6-million in July 2002 to 48,7-million in July 2008, according to Statistics South Africa's General Household Survey.

Released on Tuesday, the survey -- specifically designed to measure various aspects of the living circumstances of South African households -- showed that the percentage of individuals attending an educational institution increased slightly from 33,1% to 34,4% between 2002 and 2008.

The percentage of children aged nought to four years who were attending an educational institution increased from 7,4% in 2002 to 16,9% in 2008.

The Pretoria-based agency found that the percentage of children aged five to nine years who were attending an educational institution increased from 79,9% in 2002 to 88,6% in 2008.

The percentage of five year olds attending educational institutions increased from 40,4% in 2002 to 63,3% in 2008, while the percentage of learners in the six-years age group increased from 70,9% to 87,1%, the agency said.

The percentage of individuals with no education (aged 20 and above) decreased from 10,3% (2002) to 8,8% (2008).

According to the survey, the percentage of individuals who completed Grade 12 (Matric/NSC) increased from 22,8% in 2002 to 24,6% in 2008.

Among persons aged seven to 24 years that were not attending an educational institution, lack of money for fees remained the most common reason for not attending.

Turning to health, Statistics SA said that during the month preceding the survey, 13,7% of the population were ill or injured.

"This is the highest reported since 2002 when only 11,3% were ill or injured."

In the general population, 77,7% of those who were ill or injured consulted a health worker.

According to Statistics SA, the percentage of households countrywide with high satisfaction levels increased from 87,5% in 2002 to 89,1% in 2008.

More individuals who used public sector health care facilities were satisfied with the service they received in 2008 (91,2%) than in 2002 (81,1%).

Medical Aid coverage was lowest amongst blacks, with only 8,4% of individuals covered in 2008, and highest amongst the white population, with 68,5% coverage.

Turning to household assets, Statistics SA said there had been a marginal increase in the percentage of households that found themselves in informal dwellings (from 13,1% in 2002 to 13,4% in 2008).

"When households compared their current dwelling type (2008) with their own dwelling type of five years ago (2004), there has been some improvement," Statistics SA said.

It added that in all provinces, considerably more households no longer found themselves in informal or traditional structures as their main dwelling.

"A continued growth in ownership of those occupying formal separate dwelling is observed -- ownership increased from 62,6% in 2002 to 70,1% in 2008."

Cellphone ownership more than doubled between 2002 and 2008 (from 37,6% to 79,1%, Statistics SA said while television ownership increased from 59,3% in 2002 to 72,4% in 2008. -- Sapa

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-09-02-sa-population-increases-to-487m

Interpol Criticises Selebi Prosecution

Interpol criticises Selebi prosecution

JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA
Sep 02 2009 11:16

Interpol secretary general Ronald Noble on Wednesday criticised the slow prosecution of corruption-accused former South African police chief Jackie Selebi.

"I've never seen happening what is happening in South Africa," Noble told reporters at a Southern African Police Conference in Johannesburg.

He said he did not understand why it was taking so long to prosecute Selebi.

"If they have a case against him, charge him ... give him the dignity he deserves. Mr Selebi is an honourable man," said Noble.

He said accusing a head of any police organisation was " a serious charge".

"I sure hope that South Africa is still a country where people are innocent until proven guilty," said Noble.

Selebi took special leave in 2007, when it emerged he was about to be charged with alleged corruption relating to his relationship with convicted drug-trafficker Glenn Agliotti.

Agliotti was also a co-accused in the murder of mining magnate Brett Kebble, whose funds were allegedly used to pay Selebi.

Selebi faces two charges of corruption and one of defeating the ends of justice.

He made his first court appearance in February 2008 by agreement and without arrest, and his actual trial had been delayed by various applications and counter-applications relating to the investigation against him.

His trial was supposed to have started in April this year, but at his last court appearance in Johannesburg in May, he was angered by the delays.

The corruption trial was postponed to October 5.

Selebi served as Interpol president from 2004 until January 12 2008. He resigned after being suspended as police commissioner over the corruption allegations. -- Sapa

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-09-02-interpol-criticises-selebi-prosecution

Survey Reveals US Fares Poorly in Child Welfare

Survey reveals US fares poorly in child welfare

GREG KELLER | PARIS, FRANCE - Sep 02 2009 11:46

The United States (US) has some of the industrial world's worst rates of infant mortality, teenage pregnancy and child poverty, even though it spends more per child than better-performing countries such as Switzerland, Japan and the Netherlands, a new survey indicates.

The Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), a Paris-based watchdog of industrialised nations, urged the United States to shift more of its public spending to its youngest children, under the age of six, to improve their health and educational performance.

The report, released on Tuesday, is called Doing Better for Children, and marks the first time the OECD has reported on child well-being within its 30-member countries.

The US spends an average of $140 000 per child, well over the OECD average of $125 000. But this spending is skewed heavily toward older children between 12 and 17, the survey showed.

US spending on children under the age of six, a period the OECD says is key to children's future well-being, lags far behind that of other countries, amounting to only $20 000 per child on average compared to the organisation's average of $30 000, according to the survey.

"A better balance of spending between the 'Dora the Explorer' years of early childhood and the teenage 'Facebook' years would help improve the health, education and well-being of all children in the long term," the OECD said.

As a result, it says, infant mortality in the US is the fourth-worst in the OECD after Mexico, Turkey and Slovakia.

America's 15-year-olds rank seventh from the bottom on the OECD's measure of average educational achievement. Child poverty rates in the US are nearly double the organisation's average, at 21,6% compared to 12,4%.

The rate of teen births in the US is three times the OECD average, with only Mexico recording a higher rate among OECD countries, the report said.

Timothy Smeeding, author of Poor Kids in a Rich Country: America's Children in Comparative Perspective, said America's troubles stem from a flawed mix of government spending and not enough help for the working poor.

"Most of what we spend is for health care, so there is less money to spend on income support programs, to keep the incomes of the poor up. We do spend highly on education -- but it's off the charts on health care," he said.

Some European countries have public pre-schools and day care centres, for example.

"The parents in Europe aren't as poor. They have universal health care, and it's understood that you have access to health care without recrimination. They have children when they're ready," said Smeeding, who also heads the Institute for Research on Poverty at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

"A lot of kids born in our country are accidents," he said.

"Young women need to learn to wait to finish their education, not have a kid at 18 or 19. And it is these poor, unwed mothers having most of the babies in the US"

Among other OECD countries, France, Germany, Britain and Belgium spend more on their children than the US, while Switzerland, Ireland, Australia and Italy spend less, according to the survey.

The countries that spend the most on early childhood include Hungary, Finland and the Slovak Republic, which each devote well over a quarter of all childhood spending to children under the age of six.

Britain also spends more than the OECD average on its children, and like the US, devotes most of this spending to its older children between the ages of 12 and 17.

But Britain is plagued by high underage drinking and teenage pregnancy rates. British teen drunkenness, as measured by the number of 13 and 15-year-olds having been drunk at least twice, topped the charts at 33%, far above the OECD average of 20% and the 12% rate recorded in the US--Sapa

Associated Press Writer Rachel Kurowski in Paris contributed to this report

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-09-02-survey-reveals-us-fares-poorly-in-child-welfare

Tehran Offers to Resume Nuclear Talks With 'Updated' Proposal

Tehran offers to resume nuclear talks with 'updated' proposal

As a US deadline for Iran to respond to an offer of new nuclear talks looms, Iran's chief negotiator says Tehran has prepared an “updated nuclear proposal”. But a senior US official has dismissed the offer as containing "not a hint of substance"

REUTERS - Iran has prepared an "updated nuclear proposal" and is ready to talk to world powers, state television quoted the Islamic Republic's chief nuclear negotiator as saying on Tuesday.

The announcement was made a day before six world powers were expected to hold high-level talks in Germany on what to do about Iran's contentious nuclear programme. The West suspects the Islamic state is seeking to build bombs. Iran denies the charge.

"Iran has prepared an updated nuclear proposal and is ready to resume negotiations with world powers," al-Alam, Iran's Arabic-language satellite channel, quoted chief nuclear negotiator Saeed Jalili as saying.

The official IRNA news agency quoted him as saying Iran was ready to use its "capacities to remove common concerns on the international scene".

Such language may cause suspicion in Western capitals that Iran's proposal, like others before, fails to specifically address their concerns about its nuclear ambitions and is a ruse to buy time and avert the threat of more punitive measures.

A senior U.S. official was dismissive of the remarks attributed to Jalili, a leading nuclear hardliner, saying there was "not a hint of substance" in them.

The official told Reuters he believed the comments were "timed to split the P-5 (powers) by giving China and Russia reason to break ranks on Iran sanctions."

Moscow and Beijing, major trade partners of Iran, have long opposed harsh sanctions.

Iran has repeatedly rejected demands to halt uranium enrichment, which can have both military or civilian purposes, or even freeze it at current levels of output.

U.S. President Barack Obama gave Iran until later this month to take up a six-power offer of talks on trade benefits if it shelves nuclear fuel production, or face wider sanctions that could target Iran's vulnerable gasoline sector.

The content of Tehran's proposal and the extent to which it addressed the six powers' concerns, was not immediately clear.

"We've seen the reports, though we have not heard anything conclusively from the Iranians on that," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said. Of Obama's offer of talks, he said: "It's still out there, it is still waiting for a response."

ECONOMIC INCENTIVES

Asked about the report of Iran's readiness for talks, a Western diplomat told Reuters in Vienna: "If it is confirmed ... it would of course be very welcome."

But a German Foreign Ministry spokesman said it had not yet been contacted by Iran: "For us, the situation hasn't changed."

Germany will host talks on Iran's nuclear programme this week with the United States, China, France, Britain and Russia.

German Chancellor Angela Merkel, speaking at a joint news conference with French President Nicolas Sarkozy, said on Monday Iran should realise how "very serious" the Obama deadline was.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Hassan Qashqavi condemned those remarks and said sanctions would not work.

"Their interfering comments show that they do not have any realistic or correct understanding about developments in Iran and are a clear interference in other country's internal affairs," the official news agency IRNA quoted him as saying.

An International Atomic Energy Agency report last week said Iran had again ignored U.N. Security Council demands it stop enriching uranium and open up to IAEA investigators "to exclude the possibility of military dimensions" to its nuclear activity.

Washington and its allies may go after Iran's gasoline imports in a possible fourth round of sanctions. That could seriously hurt Iran, which, although it is the world's number five oil exporter, imports up to 40 percent of its gasoline.

Russia and China have reluctantly backed three rounds of moderate sanctions touching on Iran's nuclear and missile industries since 2006, though they managed to water down some measures before voting for them in the U.N. Security Council.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said back in April, before his disputed re-election in June, that Iran had prepared its own proposals to end the stalemate. But no details emerged.

The six powers originally offered Iran trade, financial and diplomatic incentives in 2006 in exchange for a suspension of enrichment. Iran's response hinted at some flexibility but ruled out suspension as a precondition for talks.

The six improved the offer in June 2008 but retained the precondition. Iran said it wanted a broader peace and security deal, dismissed by Western officials as vague and irrelevant, and rejected any "condescending" formula to shelve enrichment.

Diplomats say Western officials have suggested a face-saving way into talks could be a verified freeze in enrichment expansion, with suspension still the goal in exchange for benefits to Iran. But Tehran has ruled out any such freeze.

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

New York Artists Demand Freedom For Mumia Abu-Jamal

Artists demand: ‘Free Mumia!’

Published Aug 27, 2009 9:15 PM

New York—On Aug. 21 the Solidarity Center here was filled with five hours of inspiring sounds: music and spoken word from talented artists (photo right) brought together to support the case of political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal, known worldwide as the “voice of the voiceless.”

Black Waxx Recordings and Artists and Activists United for Peace organized the celebration to officially release a powerful two-disc CD called “On the Move—Sounds Inspired by Mumia Abu-Jamal.” It aims to help raise broader awareness of the political significance of Mumia’s case and why he should be set free immediately after spending more than 27 years on Pennsylvania’s death row. Throughout the evening, the audience clapped, sang, cried and chanted during the performances.

Some of the artists who lent their voices to the CD—such as Nana Soul, Stephanie Rice, SoSoon, Maya Azucena, Spiritchild, Latisha Devine, Melinda Davis and others—gave live performances. The acclaimed, legendary film director Melvin Van Peebles and Pam Africa from International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal gave special remarks. U-Savior Washington, a film director and a producer of the CD, presided over the program.

August 21 has been designated “Black August” because on this day, 38 years ago, Soledad Brother and Black Panther Party leader George Jackson was assassinated by prison guards in San Quentin prison.

To order the CD, e-mail info@blackwaxx.com.

—Report & photo by Monica Moorehead

From New Introduction to 'HIgh Tech, Low Pay'

From new introduction to ‘High Tech, Low Pay’

Does present crisis compare to Great Depression

Published Aug 30, 2009 11:48 PM

Here is our fourth installment of excerpts from a new introduction to the ground-breaking work “High Tech, Low Pay.” The book, written by Sam Marcy during the early stages of capitalist restructuring and first published in 1986, has long been out of print and will soon be reissued. Fred Goldstein, who wrote this introduction, is author of “Low-Wage Capitalism: Colossus with Feet of Clay.”

Many comparisons are made between the present crisis and the Great Depression. But while the depression of the 1930s is fully known, the present crisis is in its early stages and has yet to be played out. Many specifics cannot be known at this point. It is best from a Marxist point of view, i.e., from a materialist standpoint, to focus on what can be studied right now.

What can be compared are the historic periods leading up to the depression of the 1930s and later to the present crisis, which began with the collapse of the housing bubble in 2007. These periods can be effectively compared.

From Civil War to Great Depression

In the first crisis, the economic forces that drove U.S. capitalism forward in the 70 years from the U.S. Civil War to the world depression of the 1930s had exhausted themselves. They were no longer able to stimulate any significant capitalist revival during the entire decade from 1929 to 1939. No economic means could bring back capitalist prosperity.

What were those forces? The Indigenous nations had finally been driven from all their lands. The so-called “frontier” had been occupied, including the half of Mexico that was annexed to become the Southwest of the United States. After the Civil War the African-American population of the South had again been subjugated, this time into a state of semi-slavery through the sharecropping system. The railroad boom had run its course. Imperialist expansion in the so-called Spanish-American War of 1898 had brought Cuba, Puerto Rico and the Philippines into the U.S. empire, along with Samoa and Hawaii. U.S. businesses had pushed deeper into China and Latin America.

Profits rolled in from World War I and helped sustain the system for a period. There was rapid expansion of the auto industry, the electrification of the country and mass production of appliances. But by the late 1920s the expansion had led to overproduction. Massive credit and land speculation led to a crash in real estate and the stock market crash in 1929.

These were the forces that drove capitalism for 70 years after the Civil War. Once they were exhausted, the system went into a state of absolute decline and could only be revived by war preparations and, finally, World War II itself.

It took 15 million U.S. soldiers under arms and an emergency regime of total war production to alleviate mass unemployment in the U.S. It took the deaths of 50 million people or more and the destruction of factories, mines, ports, railroads, bridges and residential buildings throughout Europe and Asia to overcome the pre-war economic crisis and put capitalism back on its feet.

From World War II to 2007

A review of the situation leading up to the present crisis bears an ominous resemblance to that which preceded the Great Depression. Namely, the forces that have propelled U.S. capitalism and the development of the means of production to higher and higher levels throughout the last 70 years, since the beginning of World War II, have exhausted themselves. Artificial means employed to keep the system going are no longer sufficient to revive it in any significant way. This has led to a period of profound stagnation and perhaps to absolute decline.

In the period since World War II, U.S. capitalism has relied on various artificial methods to keep the system from collapsing. War and war preparation were a basic stimulant for decades during the post-war period. The Korean War, the Vietnam War, the military buildup during the Cold War—all served to generate capitalist production and profits, as the system could not rely on the civilian economy to automatically keep it going.

But by the end of the 1980s, even the $2 trillion Reagan military buildup in a “full-court press” to undermine the Soviet Union and the socialist camp was insufficient to sustain capitalist prosperity. The monstrous growth of the military-industrial complex has it limits as an economic stimulant.

Marcy dealt with the role of the military in bolstering the capitalist economy in Chapter 2. He showed how it fostered the scientific-technological revolution and shaped crucial sectors of the corporate economic structure to aid its design for world empire. At the same time, he showed how dependent even the largest corporations had become on the military.

The continuous development of the scientific-technological revolution, the restructuring of capitalist industry, the relentless anti-labor campaign of union-busting, the extraction of concessions, the destruction of benefits, the driving down of manufacturing wages and the steady expansion of the low-wage service economy—all enormously increased inequality in the national income in favor of capital and at the expense of the workers. All this served to bolster the profitability of the bosses and bankers. It gave the bosses a great infusion of surplus value, stolen from the workers, to ease the crisis of capital.

The collapse of the USSR and Eastern Europe in the 1990s and the opening up of China to capitalist investment gave imperialism a brief period of unprecedented global expansion. The monopolies seized this opportunity to create global networks of exploitation and vast super-profits as they engineered a worldwide wage competition among the international working class and promoted the vicious race to the bottom previously referred to. Driving down the value of labor is the time-tested method of capital for combating the declining rate of profit brought about by the growing cost allocated to constant capital (plant, equipment and raw materials) and the reduction in variable capital (wages).

Globalized production has now brought a worldwide epidemic of layoffs and mass unemployment.

Militarism, technological development and anti-labor attacks were not enough to save the banks and corporations. Huge injections of credit were required. The ruling class resorted to speculation, credit bubbles, mortgage schemes, exotic financial instruments and all manner of fraud to make profits based on trading in fictitious capital. To overcome the limitations on the profitability of industry, unlimited paper profits were conjured up.

To be continued.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Articles copyright 1995-2009 Workers World. Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in any medium without royalty provided this notice is preserved.

Workers World, 55 W. 17 St., NY, NY 10011
Email: ww@workers.org
Page printed from:
http://www.workers.org/2009/us/great_depression_0903/

Iranian Lawmakers Behind Ahmadinejad's Choice

Iranian lawmakers behind Ahmadinejad’s choice

AFP

TEHERAN. Iranian lawmakers yesterday unanimously backed President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad’s choice of defence minister, Ahmad Vahidi, who faces an arrest warrant from Argentina over a 1994 bombing in Buenos Aires.

Dressed in military uniform, Vahidi addressed the Iranian parliament and outlined his four-year plan ahead of a vote of confidence by parliament on the 21-member cabinet line-up today.

Vahidi faced no opposition in the parliament as he elaborated his plans for the ministry, which include "building innovative defence products and expansion of regional and international co-operation with an active defence diplomacy."

Argentina accuses Vahidi of being involved in the bombing of a Buenos Aires Jewish community centre that killed 85 people.

In 2007, Interpol formally distributed an Argentine arrest warrant for Vahidi to its 187 member countries.

Argentina has expressed outrage over Iran's nomination of Vahidi and has urged that he be arrested.

MP Hadi Ghavami, who had initially indicated he would oppose Vahidi’s nomination, said in a note read out by the parliament presiding board that he would now vote for the nominee due to the "sinister and meddling position taken by the Zionist regime (Israel)".

Gholam-Reza Karami, head of the assembly’s defence commission, expressed "strong support (for Vahidi) and strong objection to the Zionist lobbies" against Vahidi.

Karami’s statement was cheered by MPs, who chanted, "Death to Israel!"

Vahidi promised that if appointed defence minister he would "boost the deterrent capabilities . . . to change threats into opportunities in order to strengthen national security . . . "

Iranian media says Vahidi will win the vote of confidence as international opposition to him has actually helped unite the conservative Iranian lawmakers in his favour. — AFP.

African Union Observers Call For Calm in Gabon

AU observers call for calm in Gabon

Reuters

LIBREVILLE. African Union observers called for calm and Gabon’s security forces stepped up patrols in the capital yesterday as election officials further delayed the result of a hotly contested presidential vote.

Three rivals, including the son of Gabon’s late ruler Omar Bongo, have all claimed victory in Sunday’s election in the central African oil nation.

Authorities dismissed as speculation the unofficial estimates being circulated by rival camps.

"The figures doing the rounds do not in our view have any firm basis," Rene Aboghe Ella, president of the election commission, said, adding that the commission would meet to verify the results today.

"This is the standard timeframe, and one we have observed in the past," he said.

Opposition leaders accuse ex-defence minister Ali Ben Bongo of rigging the poll to ensure a dynastic transfer of power from his father, but election monitors and ex-colonial power France have said they are broadly satisfied with procedures so far.

"The mission calls on the candidates . . . and the entire population to ensure peace and democracy is maintained in Gabon by sticking to dialogue," Albert Tevoedjre, head of the AU election observer team in Gabon, said yesterday.

Omar Bongo’s death in June, aged 73, ended nearly 42 years of rule that brought stability to Gabon but also allegations that he lavished petrodollars on family and friends rather than using them to alleviate still widespread poverty.

Ben Bongo (50) had long been tipped as the favourite and was quick to declare victory on Monday.

But that call was disputed by former interior minister Andre Mba Obame and by Pierre Mamboundou, one of the few rival candidates with no history of ties to Bongo.

Both of Ben Bongo’s rivals also claimed victory.

A Reuters witness said anti-riot police had been deployed to Libreville’s Place de la Paix, one of the squares often used for political gatherings, while Republican Guard soldiers had joined the usual gendarme presence outside some government buildings.

Gabon’s electoral system allows for only one round of voting, meaning that a candidate need only win more votes than his nearest rival rather than the majority of the ballots cast.

Some analysts have said this clearly favours Ben Bongo as his opponents fielded more than 20 candidates and struggled to unite behind a single challenger until a handful dropped out to back Obame two days ahead of the vote.

"It is wait-and-see for the moment," said strategist Ridle Markus at Absa Capital Research of the investment outlook.

"There is no real risk or reason why they (investors) should get out. But at the same time we would be advising them not to go in until there is clarity about the result and in particular the reaction to the result," he added.

Gabon hosts oil firms including France’s Total and US-based Vaxalco, and is one of the few sub-Saharan countries to have launched a Eurobond.

The vote is the latest democracy test in a region that has seen a string of disputed polls and power grabs over the past year, including the move by Niger’s president to extend his term in office, and a disputed Congo Republic election won by the long-serving incumbent.

Some fear a transfer of power from Bongo father to son would encourage other ageing African leaders to groom their offspring for future rule, for example in Senegal and Libya where leaders’ sons are already in high-profile positions.

Analysts say any successor to Bongo will have to cope with dwindling oil reserves that will mean the loss of some revenue in the sector, which currently makes up half of national output. — Reuters.

African States and Common Currencies

African states and common currencies

The enduring poverty and trade handicaps besetting the continent could be eased by countries ditching nationalist sentiment and joining currency blocs

By Thorvaldur Gylfason
Saturday, Aug 29, 2009

If African countries were to adopt only one policy to boost economic growth and improve macroeconomic stability, they should reduce the number of currencies in circulation across the continent as quickly as possible. Doing so would most likely encourage trade, as happened in Europe with the arrival of the euro, and could help contain inflation — which is always good for growth — by imposing international discipline on monetary policy.

The African Union is now aiming at pooling all the continent’s currencies into a single currency by 2028. In the meantime, several regional monetary unions are on the drawing board, in addition to the two monetary unions that already exist — one de jure and the other de facto.

The premier and oldest of these unions is composed of the 14 countries that belong to the Economic and Monetary Community of Central Africa and the West African Economic and Monetary Union, which both use the CFA franc. The second of these unions is composed of Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland and now Zimbabwe, all of which use the South African rand. Disregarding Zimbabwe, a recent and incomplete convert, the 18 countries of the two existing monetary unions have, as intended, benefited from lower inflation than much of the rest of Africa.

‘The belief that sovereign national currencies ... are the best way to foster economic and social development ... is gradually falling by the wayside.’

To see why, consider Nigeria. Before independence, Nigeria’s legal tender was the British pound. With the establishment of the Central Bank of Nigeria in 1959, the Nigerian pound was introduced. Back then, 1 Nigerian pound was equivalent to 1 British pound (then about US$3). This arrangement remained intact until 1973, when Nigeria adopted a new currency, the naira. The exchange rate remained unchanged: one naira was equivalent to 1 British pound.

The naira was intended to bolster the country’s independence by making it possible for the central bank to pursue its own monetary policy. It was also a matter of national pride. The thinking behind the new arrangement was that an independent and flexible monetary policy would serve the nation’s interest better than a fixed exchange rate that tied the naira to the pound.

But the naira’s introduction quickly put an end to parity with the British pound. Government expenditure exceeded federal revenue, despite rapidly rising foreign-exchange earnings from oil exports after 1970. The federal government’s budget deficits were financed through foreign and domestic borrowing, and by printing money, which led to inflation and depreciation of the new currency. Today, it costs 220 naira to buy 1 British pound, which implies 15 percent annual average depreciation since 1973.

This depreciation would perhaps be justifiable had Nigeria managed to use easy money to narrow the gap between ordinary Nigerians’ standard of living and that of people living in Britain. But that did not happen. The purchasing power of national income per person in Nigeria is now 50 percent lower relative to Britain than in 1980.

In view of this experience, Nigeria now plans to abolish the naira in favor of joining a monetary union with four or five other West African countries (Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Sierra Leone and perhaps Liberia). But that planned monetary union, until recently envisaged to be launched this year, has been put on ice.

Why? The smallest countries show no signs of fear of being swamped by Nigeria, by far the most populous country in the group (accounting for 155 million of the six countries’ 200 million people), especially as the new West African Central Bank is to be located in Accra, the capital of Ghana (24 million). Others, though, may fear the dilution of their sovereignty when the new Central Bank of the West African Monetary Zone takes over some of the policymaking responsibilities of national central banks. But that, of course, is the chief purpose of a monetary union.

When the West African Monetary Zone is finally established, the number of currencies in Africa will equal about half the number of countries. And when the East African Community with its five members (Burundi, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Uganda) re-emerges as scheduled, the number of currencies will be reduced by another four.

The belief that sovereign national currencies, by enabling independent and flexible monetary policies, are the best way to foster economic and social development — the vision of Nigeria’s postcolonial leaders — is gradually falling by the wayside. Efficiency dictates the use of fewer and larger currencies (and foreign investors, understandably wary of weak and volatile currencies, demand it).

Indeed, the success of the EU and of the euro since its launch in 1999 has made a strong impression in Africa. Currencies, to paraphrase Winston Churchill, are like democracies: The best way to preserve their integrity is to share them.

Thorvaldur Gylfason is professor of economics at the University of Iceland.

South African Women Still Struggle For Equality

Women still struggle for equality

FARANAAZ PARKER | JOHANNESBURG, SOUTH AFRICA
Sep 01 2009 06:00

Women are still as underrepresented in the labour force and in management positions as they were four years ago. This is according to the annual MasterCard Worldwide Index of Women's Advancement, released earlier this month.

The survey showed that there has been little change in employment participation rates among men and women -- about 48% of women are engaged in the labour force compared with 82% of men.

These numbers have remained fairly static with only about a 1% difference in the past four years. In Australia 69% of women participate in the labour force compared with 80% of men.

The reasons for women’s low employment in South Africa are multifaceted.

"The unemployment rate is much higher for women than it is for men. That in itself discourages women from joining the labour force," said Dr Miriam Altman, executive director of the Centre for Poverty, Employment and Growth at the Human Sciences Research Council.

According to Altman, the chances of young South Africans finding a job are about 50-50, but the odds are even less for women, who face more barriers to finding work.

"Culturally, the expectation is that women will look after the children. About one-third of young women are HIV positive and a large proportion of women live in rural areas where there are fewer work opportunities," she said.

Altman said that to improve women’s participation in the workforce, the country would need to encourage them to get into non-traditional work, raise education levels and improve healthcare.

For mothers leaving rural areas to find work, "we need to make it safer, easier and cheaper for women to integrate into the city," she said.

Experts say that statistics on labour force participation can be skewed by increased unemployment rates -- if men lose their jobs, women are seen to be making up a larger percentage of the labour force.

The number of women who have given up looking for work is not reflected and neither is whether women are employed in skilled or unskilled work.

Carlene van der Westhuizen, a senior researcher in the Development Policy Research Unit at the University of Cape Town, said a study carried out between 1994 and 2005 showed that women got slightly more than half of net new jobs created.

"But most of those jobs were low-skilled or unskilled -- for example domestic work -- so they didn't necessarily benefit from skilled or semi-skilled jobs."

For academics, a more accurate way of measuring women's advancement in the economy is by looking at average earnings and the gender wage gap.

"Generally we've found that women earn less than men for the same kind of work," Van der Westhuizen said.

Women already in the labour force struggle to make headway in their careers. The survey found that only about 36% of women worked in managerial positions.

This number has dropped is the past three years.

Dr Elaine Salo, director of the Institute for Women's and Gender Studies at the University of Pretoria, said she suspects this may have something to do with the global economic downturn.

"There's a gendered ideology in the world of work that still considers women as having increased employment risk," she said.

Women are more likely to be accommodated when profit margins are high but when the financial climate cools employers tend to retain the men in their companies as they see women as carrying the "gendered risks" of getting married, getting pregnant or having to move for their families, Salo said.

South Africa needs to "play catch-up" when it comes to including women in the workplace, she said.

Oddly, women outstrip men when it comes to enrolment in tertiary education. The discrepancy between the percentage of women who study further and the percentage of women in management positions, though consistent with other countries surveyed, is glaring.

Altman said one reason for the discrepancy could be social — women often study for traditional roles such as nursing, psychology and other caring professions.

"They tend not to go into management-type jobs. They'll become teachers or nurses. Degrees like commerce or engineering are more likely to lead to management positions," she said.

Salo gave an alternative view: "It might be that women feel they need more skills to get the same jobs as men. It could also be that tertiary institutions are more sensitive to the need for equality [than businesses]," she said.

According to the World Economic Forum's 2008 Global Gender Gap Report -- which rates gender equality in terms of economic participation and opportunity, educational attainment, political empowerment, health and survival -- Norway, Finland and Sweden are the countries with the smallest gender gap overall.

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-09-01-women-still-struggle-for-equality


All women should be included

FARANAAZ PARKER - Aug 31 2009 06:00

Though the Broad-Based BEE Act definitively rules out white women as BEE beneficiaries, the question of whether they should be considered for affirmative action continues to spur debate.

Statistics show that women are underrepresented in the labour force and even more so higher up the career ladder.

In 2007 Jimmy Manyi, president of the Black Management Forum, caused waves when he said white women were overrepresented at executive levels and should be removed from the list of designated groups under the Employment Equity Act.

Earlier this year another controversy arose when former Absa chairperson Gill Marcus was named to replace Tito Mboweni as governor of the South African Reserve Bank at the end of the year.

Marcus, an ANC stalwart, is highly respected in financial circles and though her appointment is a first for women in the history of the bank, the news was overshadowed by a debate about “minorities” in the economic cluster.

Speaking to journalists after the announcement, ANC Youth League president Julius Malema said his organisation had expected “an African child to occupy that strategic position”.

But the position of the Businesswomen’s Association (BWA) has always been to “stand united” in the face of such debate. “The numbers speak for themselves -- women are underrepresented. We cannot start talking about degrees of disadvantage because it becomes petty and it takes the debate backwards,” said BWA board member Kunyalala Maphisa, adding that it is possible to take cognisance of these degrees of disadvantage without excluding certain women.

According to Maphisa, the BWA census did not bear out Manyi’s assertion that white women are over- represented.“Besides, the issue self-corrects when you consider BEE. All these interventions should be taking place concurrently,” said Maphisa.

She said she was not surprised by the findings of the MasterCard index or that affirmative action has failed to help women advance in the workplace.

“There are two questions. First, is it being implemented correctly, and second, are women taking advantage of it? Affirmative action is about empowerment. If women don’t acquire the requisite skills and experience to hold management positions, it becomes lip service. “There’s a lack of commitment on the part of our male counterparts to ensure adequate mentorship and many women choose not to go the managerial route because the environment is hostile.”

Maphisa said a process of “collective engagement” is required to get men to appreciate the position of women in the workplace. “Women tend to discuss their problems among themselves. That for me counts as a monologue; what you want is a dialogue with men,” she said.

Maphisa said the inclusion of women in the workplace is a matter of policy and will. She pointed to government’s commitment to gender equality as an example of how gender-bias can be corrected.

The BWA’s 2009 census of women leaders in government, state-owned enterprises and JSE-listed companies shows that government is ahead when it comes to gender equity in the workplace.

Although women represent only 0.5% of senior management in government, they make up 55.5% of all government workers and 48.3% of highly skilled workers.

When it comes to women in leadership positions, state-owned enterprises outperform the private sector -- women hold 40% of directorships in state-owned enterprises but only 13.2% of directorships in JSE-listed companies.

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-08-31-all-women-should-be-included


We celebrate otherness today

COLLEEN LOWE MORNA: COMMENT - Aug 31 2009 06:00

Long before the Caster Semenya sex-test row hit the headlines, South Africans in all their corners were questioning her identity.

Inevitably questions such as “would you want to be seen with her”, “would you marry her” and “she must be a lesbian” peppered conversation. It’s wonderful how the rainbow nation has rallied around its “golden girl”. But how deep, how broad, how far and for how long will this celebration of otherness last?

Remember, Semenya’s agony did not start with (though it will be considerably aggravated by) being thrust under the global media spotlight. It started with being a little girl who liked playing soccer in the dusty plains of Limpopo, who has been refused entry into public toilets and whose humiliation did not start in Berlin.

As I watched the headlines progress from “She’s a lady, man” and “Yes, she’s a girl” to “All black, all gold, she’s our girl”, I could not help but remember the story of Marco Ndlovu, one of many women who annually participate in workshops to chronicle their lives at Gender Links.

The following are a few lines from her testimony, written under the header “Finding the real me”: “I am a 39-year-old black lesbian born into to a family of eight, of whom only five survived. Gender violence has been so much a part of my life that at times I wonder if there is such a thing as a life free of violence.

“As a lesbian, hate, violence and misogyny follow me wherever I go. I became pregnant as a result of being raped by a man I believed to be a friend. I have been beaten almost to pulp because of my sexual orientation.

“I have a female lover, but since she is not ready to be open about our relationship, we have to keep it secret. While I look for whatever job I can get so that I can build a home for my children and grandchildren, I write poetry and create the world of my dreams with the words that flow from my pen.

I am Marco, a proud woman, who loves her two daughters, who loves other women, and who -- despite the pain and suffering that I have endured -- is finally finding the real me.”

I remembered Marco, because like Semenya she is athletic, muscular, flat-chested and could easily be mistaken for a man. Unlike Semenya, she will not have a hero’s welcome, meet the president or have the whole nation proclaim her right to be.

As we welcome Semenya home, it behoves us to ask how many others there are out there, men and women, who have refused to conform to societal templates, and whether we will stand up for them in the same way.

In the very same newspapers that have now shown us every angle of Semenya’s face, her facial hair, her crotch, her braided hair and her muscular body (whenever before has a woman athlete featured so prominently on the front page of any newspaper?), we have the obligatory blonde, blue-eyed, skinny pin-up girls from Planet Hollywood pasted on back pages.

On the same page heralding Semenya’s red-carpet welcome on Tuesday, one paper reported on Miss South Africa, Tatum Keshwar, saying she hopes she has done the nation proud by being selected seventh in the Miss Universe contest.

So now its official: women come in all shapes and forms. Why is that important? Because although sex is a biological given (though even that, we have learned, is far from straightforward), gender is a social construct: how society expects women and men to behave.

Precisely because girls are expected to be pretty faces with limited strength and thinking capacity, they retreat or are forced to retreat from sport, from public life, from hard beats in the media, from boardrooms and management, from entrepreneurship and jobs such as mining and security.

Stereotypes also limit men: they should not cry, feel, care or engage in “women’s work”. In the past several years we have been running a course called Business Unusual in different parts of Southern Africa.

In Tanzania we found Masai men making money by using their skill in braiding hair to run salons in a local market, describing how, by challenging their socialisation, they are doing a rip-roaring trade. Bravo to them.

Will women in South Africa, come the World Cup in 2010, get to play the game, drive taxis and build highways? If we fail to use this extraordinary event to breathe life into the celebration of diversity envisaged in the Constitution, our large turnout at Oliver Tambo Airport this week will have been little more than a fleeting show of national unity.

We will have raised a middle finger to the rest of the world but retreated into our cocoon of black and white, male and female -- not the rainbow nation we claim to be. Unlike Marco, we will still not have found our true selves.

Colleen Lowe Morna is executive director of Gender Links.

Source: Mail & Guardian Online
Web Address: http://www.mg.co.za/article/2009-08-31-we-celebrate-otherness-today