Tuesday, May 04, 2010

Law Protect Workers, Writes South African Deputy President Kgalema Motlanthe

Laws protect workers, writes Kgalema Motlanthe

04 May 2010
Kgalema Motlanthe
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Struggles for 8-hour working day have spawned fair labour practices
FOR over 124 years May 1 has been celebrated around the world as International Workers’ Day.

This workers’ holiday began with the struggle for an eight-hour day in Australia, England, the US and Canada.

It reflects the history of the sweat and blood of the toiling masses since the beginning of the industrial revolution.

The first roots of May Day are to be found in Australian working people’s conditions.

As Rosa Luxemburg put it: “The happy idea of using a proletarian holiday celebration as a means to attain the eight-hour day was first born in Australia. The workers there decided in 1856 to organise a day of complete stoppage together with meetings and entertainment as a demonstration in favour of the eight-hour day.”

Thus the demand for a paid holiday and amelioration of working conditions exemplified by the demand for an 8-hour working day are historically interwoven.

Then, working conditions were atrocious and many a worker lost life and limb because of exhaustion and lapse of concentration which, in many cases, resulted in serious physical injury.

Industrial production had imposed objectionable working conditions such as long hours, child labour and a 16-hour working day.

Given this history, May Day therefore reflects the social and economic achievements of the labour movement. In 1817, Robert Owen, a Welsh socialist intellectual and revolutionary, evocatively captured the idea of an eight-hour working day in the slogan: “Eight hours labour, Eight hours recreation, Eight hours rest”.

What Owen meant was that the first eight hours of the day were for labour while the second would be for recreational activities such as reading, sports, and so on. The last eight hours would be for rest to replenish energy expended at work.

This was to be an important conceptual framework of how the rights of workers were to be understood. The first eight hours of labour were to be committed to work, this being a drastic reduction from the 16 hours extracted from workers before.

As an international labour practice, the 8-hour working day, adopted throughout the world under the rubric of fair labour practice, has been absorbed in South Africa’s democratic dispensation.

In fact, in South Africa, workers started celebrating this day in 1915 and continued to fight for it to become a paid public holiday. The SA democratic government has since elevated May Day to its rightful national status.

Recognising the exploitation of South African workers, the government has been working for the betterment of workers’ conditions since 1994.

Our Constitution guarantees workers rights such as fair labour practice, the right to form and join trade unions, strike and picket, and the right to collective bargaining.

In 1995 the government introduced, among other progressive labour laws, the Labour Rations Act (LRA) which gives rights to all workers, including domestic, farm and public sector workers.

The LRA ensures that workers cannot be dismissed for being members of a union or for legal strike action. It further requires employers to consult on major decisions such as retrenchment. Also, it set up the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration to provide easier and faster dispute settlement.

All of these changes are not an outcome of
government “benevolence” but the result of sustained workers’ struggles. It is these struggles here and elsewhere in the world that have resulted in improved working conditions protected by progressive labour laws.

As Owen’s slogan states, workers need leisure time as much as they need work time. Unfortunately, with the onset of colonialism, the experiences of the working people from developing countries have not changed much. In South Africa under apartheid black workers were exploited at the factory floor and denied social justice outside their places of work.

For instance, the Group Areas Act had located living spaces of black people far away from their places of work, meaning that they had to use most of their leisure time travelling to work.

Many residential areas designated for black people scarcely had amenities for leisure and even fewer had facilities for intellectual stimulation such as libraries.

The rhetorical question that arose out of this situation was: what is the black worker to do with his- her leisure time, in the absence of suitable conditions?

Thus part of challenges government is wrestling with as it transforms our society is to address the basic needs of the poor.

Addressing this historical backlog also happens against the background of globalisation and related economic ills such as the recent global economic recession.

The recession has had a devastating effect on workers all over the world, not least on many South African workers.

The writer is deputy president of South Africa

The Role of Africans in the Atlantic Slave Trade

Feature: The role of Africans in the slave trade

By Kofi Nti

I have always wondered why most historians and black elite rely on history books written mainly by slave traders or slave trade sympathizers, as a reference when they are writing new history books or articles on slavery. I also find it strange when some Africans jump the gun and blame our ancestors for everything concerning slavery without analyzing the thought process that informed decisions. Why not try to get firsthand oral accounts on the slave trade from descendants in Africa instead of relying mainly on European writers who in some cases twisted history to justify their bad behavior?

One feature of the Trans Atlantic slave trade that has always been buried in history books and articles written by most historians and elite African Americans is the role of ‘Prisoners of War’. It is a known fact that prisoners of war were the largest source for the slave trade.

“Prisoners of war were enslaved and they usually constituted the largest proportion of the total slave output. Warfare was rife among the savanna and forest states of West, East, Central and Southern Africa” Pacheco Pereira reported that because the kingdom of Benin in modern Nigeria was usually at war with its neighbours it possessed many captives. (Esmeraldo de Situ Orbis, D. Pacheco Pereira, translated and edited by G.H.T. Kimble, London 1937, p. 126).

Even with the above facts, almost every book or movie on slavery portrays black Africans running in the jungle chasing and kidnapping their brothers and sisters and then selling them to the white man.

Before we analyze the actions of our ancestors that resulted in “giving out” our brothers and sisters into slavery, let us try to understand how “slavery” was practiced in most African communities pre Transatlantic Slave Trade. There is this myopic thinking by some African American elites that Africans at that time must have known how harsh slavery was because many elite Africans visited Europe in that era. Many African elites?

Did the African “King” think that slavery as practiced in the Gold Coast and other communities was going to be very different from that of other faraway lands? Again Dr. Gates states and I quote “African monarchs also sent their children along these same slave routes to be educated in Europe. And there were thousands of former slaves who returned to settle Liberia and Sierra Leone.” Have we asked ourselves which schools in Europe were these sons of monarchs trained?

Not many Africans south of the Sahara had gone to the west to be educated pre independence. So what happened to the many children of the royals sent to be educated in Europe? Did they return to Africa and what does history say after they returned? i.e., if many of them did not become victims of the trade.

The other point is that Africa is a big continent so one cannot assume that because a son of a monarch travelled on the same ship out to Europe and returned home, all Africans Kings/chiefs were informed about the evils slavery as practiced by the west. Also is Dr. Gates suggesting that the former slaves who returned to Liberia and Sierra Leone were themselves engaged in the slave trade even after their experiences?

Below are some excerpts culled from N Miers & Kopytoff, Slavery, p. 111, 129, 271, 424-425; Derrick, Africa, p. 95 and accessgambia.com/information/slave-treatment-rights-privileges

“Rights:

Slaves in pre-colonial Africa enjoyed certain rights and privileges. They had the right to be fed, clothed, housed and granted the privileges of children while staying with their owners. They had the right to marry. They could marry among themselves or marry free people.

Customary rites were performed to give such marriages legal backing. Slaves enjoyed the privilege of an independent income. The Akan of Ghana say "Akoa nim som a, ofa ne ti ade di" (a loyal and faithful slave or servant has debts to his/her owner remitted). Slaves who farmed for their owners were also given plots of land on which to farm and enjoy its proceeds.

Slaves could inherit property as well as hold property of their own. The Akan say Akoa a onim som di ne wura ade ( slave or servant who knows how to serve succeeds to his/her owner's property). Slave owners did not have absolute power over their slaves, only the king or chief had power of life and death over the slave.

Indeed the king or chief had power over every citizen of the state, including the slave owners. Hence the Akan saying Ohene nkoa na owo sikan ( It is only the king/chief who wields the knife/sword).

In Ghana for example anyone who maltreated the slave to the point of death had to face the full rigors of the law. In Akyem and Asante for example, such people were asked to pay heavy fines.

The slave was entitled to legal protection. There were also avenues for social, political and economic mobility. Many African societies asserted that slavery was for life and yet they granted slaves the privilege of manumission or redemption.

The Sena of Mozambique, the Kerebe of Tanzania, the Mende of Sierra Leone and the Kongo of central Africa for example made provision for the manumission or redemption of slaves (Miers & Kopytoff, Slavery, p. 111, 129, 271, 424-425; Derrick, Africa, p. 95).

All the ethnic groups in Ghana made provision for the manumission of slaves. The slave in Ghana gained freedom through formal and informal means. The informal means was over a period of time. It was buttressed by the famous saying attributed to Asantehene Osei Tutu Obi nkyere obi ase (No one should disclose the origins of another person).

The point is further demonstrated by how almost every tribe in Ghana today uses Akan/Ashanti names which shows clearly how slaves were treated as part of a community.

Treatment:

The treatment of slaves in pre-colonial African society depended on the owner, the family and the household in which the slave resided. On the whole oral and written records portray a picture of humane treatment.

Observers from outside Africa expressed surprise at the humane treatment of slaves. Freeman, Klose, Dr. Madden, Beecham, Crowther and some British Commissioners were a few of such observers. Freeman remarked that slavery in Africa was very different from that of Europe, North America and the West Indies.

Klose stated that the slave in Africa was much better off than his/her counterpart in Europe or America. In the 1840's, Dr. Madden described the treatment of slaves as mild.

District Commissioner Crowther who worked in Ghana at the turn of the 20th century in his evidence before the Committee of West African Lands in London on 7th February, 1913, described slaves in Ghana as more like adopted children. That doesn't mean to say that harsh treatment was never meted out to them as was the case with adulterers and sometimes to prisoners of war.

Now that we have a better understanding of how “slaves” were treated pre the slave trade, let us try to look in the minds of some of our Kings/chiefs who were engaged in this practice.

Have you ever asked yourself what happened to the prisoners of war during prolonged periods of war between tribes and communities in West, Central, East and Southern Africa? There were 1000s of wars between various communities at that time of our history. What happened to a community after they were defeated at war? Some were exiled and those who went into exile later became slaves. The Trans Atlantic slave trade made it much easier for communities to get rid of their adversaries.

The rationale behind my point is what incentive is there for a conquering tribe to retain able bodied fighters from their adversaries within their midst as prisoners of war rather than exiling them away in a far away land. Then you had the European armies also exiling a big portion through conquest. What happened to the Ashanti men when they were defeated by the British? Did the Brits keep them locked up somewhere in Cape Coast and only freed them after slavery was abolished? No they were shipped out to places as far away as the Seychelles.

It was a common practice as the British on January 1, 1897, deported King of the Ashanits, Nana Prempeh and his party to the Seychelles Islands. According to Dr. Gates “The historians John Thornton and Linda Heywood of Boston University estimate that 90 percent of those shipped to the New World were enslaved by Africans and then sold to European traders.” What about those African communities/kingdoms defeated at various wars by the European armies? That number accounts for only +/-10%?

Why import gold?

As to whether all prisoners of war were SOLD or some were just sent away is a subject for further research. “The savage chiefs of the western coasts of Africa, who for ages have been accustomed to selling their captives into bondage and pocketing the ready cash for them,” Dr Gates goes on to say and I quote “But the sad truth is that the conquest and capture of Africans and their sale to Europeans was one of the main sources of foreign exchange for several African kingdoms for a very long time.

Slaves were the main export of the kingdom of Kongo; the Asante Empire in Ghana exported slaves and used the profits to import gold.” How can the Asante Empire from the Gold Coast of Africa with all the gold at their disposal sell salves to import gold?. His point is erroneous and should be researched further.

Why sell your own Army?

Think about it, did it make sense for the kings/chiefs of the various communities to round up their strongest men and sell them to the white man? How were they going to defend their kingdoms if every single able bodied man was sold?

I advocate continued review of this collective historical crime that is informed by more thorough research that is objective and dispassionate in its quest for truth.

It is patently obvious that slavery is abhorrent and evil, African culpability in this heinous practice indisputable however a more thorough review and understanding of the motivating factors influencing African involvement is warranted and frankly long overdue.

For them it was better for an enemy of their community to be a “slave” in a far away land rather than keeping the enemy around only for them to come back and fight another day?

It is hard to argue this justification lacks merit but what most of the early writers sought to do was belittle the black ancestor as a dumb King/chief who was only interested in Liquor, Mirror, gold etc. It was more sophisticated than that. This does not mean that some of the African kings and leaders were not buffoons.

Author: Kofi Nti
Email: ntimo2001@yahoo.com

Story from Myjoyonline.Com News:
http://news.myjoyonline.com/features/201005/45619.asp
Published: 5/4/2010

Joy FM's Oppong-Nkrumah Attends World Economic Forum for Africa in Tanzania

Joy FM's Oppong-Nkrumah attends World Economic Forum

Joy FM’s Super Morning Show host, Kojo Oppong-Nkrumah, is this week attending the World Economic Forum on Africa taking place in Dar es Salem, Tanzania.

The forum, which is an annual gathering of the most influential business and political leaders in Africa, will this year explore ways by which government and development partners can speed up growth in Africa.

As part of Joy FM's coverage, Kojo would be running interviews with top policy and business advocates on Africa’s development agenda. He would also be assessing the execution of commitments by World Bank and African government officials at last year’s forum.

Speaking on the Super Morning Show on Tuesday, Kojo said: “Listeners would recall that speaking to Joy FM at last year’s forum, former UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan and the World Bank Vice President for the Africa Region, Obiageli Ezekwesili, challenged African governments to take advantage of the global economic crises.

In response, African leaders committed to embark on specific policy changes aimed at making their economies more attractive to western capital. Our objective is to find out this year how much ground has been covered.”

Up to 11 heads of state and hundreds of business leaders are expected to attend this year’s forum.

A series of special reports live from the Forum in Tanzania would be aired on the Super Morning Show, Joy News and the Joy Business Report.

In his absence Evans Mensah will anchor the Super Morning Show.

Source: Myjoyonline.com/Ghana

Story from Myjoyonline.Com News:
http://news.myjoyonline.com/business/201005/45635.asp
Published: 5/4/2010

Greek Strikers Hit Athens Streets

Greek strikers hit Athens streets

Greek public sector workers have stormed the Acropolis and scuffled with riot police after launching a 48-hour strike against austerity measures.

Their action comes ahead of a nationwide general strike on Wednesday.

The austerity measures were outlined in a draft bill submitted to the Greek parliament and will be voted on by the end of the week.

They have been introduced in return for a 110bn euro (£95bn) international rescue package agreed for the country.

The measures include wage freezes, pension cuts and tax rises.

They aim to achieve fresh budget cuts of 30bn euros over three years, with the goal of cutting Greece's public deficit to less than 3% of GDP by 2014. It currently stands at 13.6%.

Union leaders say the cuts target low-income Greeks.

"There are other things the [government] can do, before taking money from a pensioner who earns 500 euros (£430) a month," Spyros Papaspyros, leader of the public servants' union ADEDY, told Greek private television.

Dozens of Communist protesters broke into the ancient Acropolis at dawn, draping giant banners on the Parthenon temple reading: "Peoples of Europe Rise Up."

"We want to send a message to the farthest reaches of Greece and Europe," Communist MP Nikos Papaconstantinou said.

"Similar measures that eliminate social security are taken across Europe. But popular anger will rattle imperialist organisations."

Silent parade

Several thousand teachers and students marched to parliament, carrying black flags and banners.

The demonstration was largely peaceful. Some protesters handed red roses to riot policemen. But some scuffles broke out near the parliament building, with demonstrators throwing stones at riot police, who responded with pepper spray.

In other signs of discontent, on Monday a group of teachers forced their way into the main state broadcaster's studios in Athens to protest about education cuts.

Also in Athens, some 150 members of the armed forces staged a silent parade to protest at having their bonuses cut.

The EU has agreed to provide 80bn euros (£69bn) in funding, while the rest will come from the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

The deal is designed to prevent Greece from defaulting on its massive debt.

However, it must first be approved by some parliaments in the 15 other eurozone countries.

Germany's Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble said private banks were willing to chip in to to Germany's part of the deal, which is expected to be the largest individual contribution, at about 22m euros.

In return for the loans, Greece will make major austerity cuts which Prime Minister George Papandreou said involved "great sacrifices".

Measures include:
Scrapping bonus payments for public sector workers
Capping annual holiday bonuses and axing them for higher earners
Banning increases in public sector salaries and pensions for at least three years
Increasing VAT from 21% to 23%
Raising taxes on fuel, alcohol and tobacco by 10%
Taxing illegal construction

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/europe/8658973.stm
Published: 2010/05/04 13:24:51 GMT

DPRK Leader Visits the People's Republic of China

Monday, May 03, 2010
08:35 Mecca time, 05:35 GMT

North Korea's Kim 'visits China'

Vehicles crossing the Friendship Bridge linking North Korea's Sinuiju with Dandong on Monday ]

North Korea's reclusive leader, Kim Jong-il, has reportedly arrived in China for his first overseas visit since a suspected stroke in 2008.

South Korea's Yonhap news agency said Kim arrived in the Chinese border city of Dandong early on Monday, citing an unnamed South Korean government official.

"We have confirmed the arrival of a special train at Dandong, and we believe it is highly likely that Chairman Kim is on board," the official told Yonhap.

Kim's first visit to China in four years comes at a time when South Korea is considering ways to respond to a suspected North Korean attack on one of its naval ships that left 46 sailors dead in one of the deadliest incidents since the end of the 1950-53 Korean war.

Peace-building trips

Kim's previous trips to China, North Korea's biggest benefactor, have led to steps that have reduced security concerns between the rival Koreas.

In 2000, Kim's trip was soon followed by a summit in Pyongyang with South Korea's leader and the start of two major joint development projects in North Korea.

South Korea is expected to seek economic and political punishment against Pyongyang for the attack on the ship but avoid a revenge strike that might spark an escalating conflict between the rivals and devastate its own recovering economy.

China, fearful of a collapse of the Kim family regime that could bring chaos to its border, has supported the Kim and his father for decades.

Analysts say Beijing wants to prevent an escalation of military tension but is unlikely to punish its neighbour if it were to blame for the attack on the warship.

Seeking aid

Analysts also say Kim may be heading to China to seek financial aid in exchange for a return to international nuclear disarmament-for-aid talks hosted by Beijing that Pyongyang has boycotted for over a year.

The North has come under pressure to return to six-country nuclear talks due to UN sanctions imposed after a May 2009 atomic test that have dealt another blow to its already shaky economy.

A South Korean naval ship sinking killed 46 sailors last month [EPA]
A 2004 trip to China led to a push for talks on the North's nuclear programmes and in his last trip in 2006, Kim toured China's industrial centres for a look at the engine of its neighbour's rapidly growing economy.

Dalian, a thriving city that has attracted major foreign investment, is a symbol of development that Beijing's leaders have advocated for years to Kim and his father and state founder Kim Il-sung, to revive the North's moribund economy.

Kim is even more reliant on China's help after a botched currency reform at the end of last year worsened inflation and sparked rare civil unrest that raised questions about Kim's grip on power in the state his family has run for more than 60 years.

There has been no official confirmation of the trip, and reporters, camping out along the railway line that Kim's special armoured train would have to use to enter China, were chased out of the area by Chinese security agents just before the suspected crossing.

Yonhap said the train thought to have carried Kim crossed in the pre dawn hours of Monday with several hundred Chinese security agents sealing off the area around the train station.

Witnesses at the border said the security clampdown ended a few hours later.

Source: Agencies

Iran President Ahmadinejad Speech Met With Walkout by Imperialist States at United Nations

Monday, May 03, 2010
21:48 Mecca time, 18:48 GMT

Ahmadinejad speech met by walkout

The Non-Proliferation Treaty seeks to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons around the world

Delegates from the US, Britain and France have walked out of a nuclear non-proliferation conference at the UN general assembly in New York after Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Iran's president, criticised nuclear weapon states.

The lower-level diplomats of the three Western nuclear-armed countries left the assembly's hall after Ahmadinejad accused nuclear states of threatening those without them.

Ahmadinejad is the only head of state taking part in the UN nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) review conference, which is hosting delegations from 189 countries.

The president rejected allegations by world powers that his country is developing nuclear weapons, citing "not a single credible proof".

'Balancing act'

Ahmadinejad urged "the suspension of members in the board of governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which use or threaten to use nuclear weapons".

"How can the United States be a member of the board of governors when it used nuclear weapons against Japan," he said.

He said nuclear atomic weapons were an encouragement to other countries to develop similar arsenals and called for a timetable for elimination of nuclear arms worldwide.

Alireza Ronaghi, Al Jazeera's correspondent in Tehran, said: "We have to be realistic about what he wanted to achieve.

"The walkouts were expected, they were announced before, he doesn't have any worries about the people who walked out, his message will come across and be heard despite the walkouts.

"The speech was less aggressive [than previous speeches].

"He is under enormous pressure from people in Iran, who accuse him of being too soft, to sign out of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

"It is a difficult balancing act that he is trying to carry out."

Speaking from New York, Marwan Bishara, Al Jazeera's senior political analyst, said: "The US and Iran obsessionwith each other is paralysing the international community, is hindering the process from moving forward.

"There is a lot of dragging and there is a long way to go. Those who have the nuclear weapons are insensitive to those who do not have them.

"His [Ahmadinejad] message was that 'we are the victims, they [the nuclear powers] are the aggressors'.

"The forum is at risk of turning into a circus where the US and Iran attack each other while leaving the rest of the international community outside the cage."

'Serious concern'

Tehran has refused to abandon its enrichment programme and now faces the prospect of UN-backed sanctions as a result of its defiance in the face of international pressure.

Hillary Clinton, the US secretary of state, is set to address the assembly later on Monday.

She cautioned last week that any efforts to disrupt the talks will fail.

"If President Ahmadinejad wants to come and announce that Iran will abide by their non-proliferation requirements under the NPT, that would be very good news indeed," she said on Thursday

Clinton said if he tried to "divert attention from this very important global effort or cause confusion that might possibly throw into doubt what Iran has been up to ... I don't believe he will have a particularly receptive audience".

The month-long NPT review conference is held twice a decade to discuss the implementation of the treaty, which calls on signatories to abandon nuclear weapons and to prevent the spread of the technology.

Ban Ki-moon, the UN secretary-general, said over the weekend that more progress needs to be made in disarmament efforts, which have been boosted by new pledges from the US and Russia in recent months.

Ban also said Iran's and North Korea's nuclear programmes were "of serious concern to global efforts to curb nuclear proliferation".

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Yemeni-owned Commercial Ship Hijacked by Somali Pirates

09:59, May 04, 2010

Yemeni-owned commercial ship hijacked by Somali pirates

A Yemeni-owned commercial ship was hijacked by Somali pirates off Yemen's southern coast with nine Yemeni crew members on board, the country's Interior Ministry said on Monday.

The ministry's report cited a statement by the Yemeni police coastguard at the Gulf of Aden as saying that the hijack took place over the past few days after the ship left the port city of Mukall, Hadramout province, sailing towards Yemeni city port of Aden.

"The ship with the license registration name of Al-Asa'a carrying various merchandise along with nine Yemeni sailors on board has been moved by pirates to Karta area in the northern coast of Somalia," the report added.

The Gulf of Aden, off the northern coast of Somalia, has the highest risk of piracy in the world. Every year about 25,000 ships use the channel south of Yemen between the Red Sea and the Arabian Sea.

Source: Xinhua

Somalia Resistance Movement Seize Pirate Haven Without a Fight

Somali insurgent seize pirate haven without a fight

Tuesday, May 4, 2010
Reuters

MOGADISHU -- Somali insurgent group Hizbul Islam seized the pirate haven of Haradheere on Sunday without a fight and pledged to take control of more towns in the region, the rebel group said.

Haradheere, and Hobyo further up the coast, are two of the main bases for pirates operating out of Somalia. The gunmen have made tens of millions of dollars by hijacking merchant vessels, bringing them to the coast and demanding ransoms.

So far, neither Hizbul Islam nor al-Qaida-linked al Shabaab rebels have been directly involved in piracy, a business that has flourished in the absence of strong government and any rule of law in the Horn of Africa nation.

"Our Mujahideen fighters are in Haradheere now, they will cross into the other towns in the region," Sheikh Mohamed Osman Arus, Hizbul Islam spokesman, told Reuters.

He denied the group wanted to get involved in piracy.

Pirates in Haradheere, however, said Hizbul Islam sent agents to the coastal town demanding a slice of the business a few days ago, but the pirates refused.

Democratic Republic of Congo Rejects Report of Army Atrocities

Kinshasa Rejects Report of Congolese Army Atrocities

Emmanuel Chaco

MBANDAKA, DR Congo, May 3 (IPS) - A report alleging that government troops summarily executed fifty civilians in early April in fighting around Mbandaka, the capital of the Democratic Republic of Congo's northwestern Équateur Province has been rejected by the government.

"About fifty Congolese civilians were killed without warning by the Congolese Armed Forces (known by its French acronym, FARDC) in April 2010," says a report by human rights group ASADHO (Association africaine de défense des droits de l’homme), a group based in Kinshasa, capital of Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC).

The report also held the Eyélé rebels for the murder of two civilians.

The report lists the victims, and claims that the killings took place while the FARDC was confronting a local rebellion that briefly took control of the airport in Mbandaka.

At a press conference on Apr. 22, Lambert Omalanga Mende, Congolese Minister of Communications and Media, said the report was riddled with inaccuracies. "it was shown that no ASADHO researchers went to Équateur to investigate the allegations contained in the report," he said.

Mende said that neither the (provincial) Governor Jean-Claude Baender nor any member of his government, the mayor and councillors of Mbandaka, nor General Ekutsu and his staff of the Thirrd Military Region, nor General Gideon and his police collaborators, or any magistrates remember having met with ASADHO investigators.

The minister said this strips of any credibility the report's claim that investigators had met politico-administrative, judicial, military and police authorities and rejected ASADHO's call for an independent commission be established to shed light on the circumstances around the killings.

Responding without giving details of the researchers who carried out the research, George Kapiamba, vice president of ASADHO, told IPS that "the investigation was indeed carried out by a team of professionals on the ground in Équateur."

A source close to the provincial government who spoke on condition of anonymity told IPS that the report has merit.

"The ASADHO report is quite true on the whole as there were indeed massacres, although it may appear to have exaggerated the number of victims, which does not change the fact that the FARDC executed innocent civilians."

Pierre Bofunda, a former soldier turned human rights advocate, also supported ASADHO's claims of extra-judicial killings by the army. "For example, Monday, April 19, a student and a young pregnant woman were executed at their home in the 'Bolenge pêcheur' neighborhood, about 10 km from the town of Mbandaka."

Bofunda says that continuing insecurity in the province is due to FARDC troops attacking people at night, stealing money, mobile phones and any valuables found on their victims.

"Besides, the provincial governor who attended the open hearing after the double murder of Apr. 19, organised a major campaign the following day against the prevailing insecurity in the province by inviting citizens to take the streets and make an uproar when a neighbor is attacked or when they hear of a case," said Bofunda.

"What do they have to lose by taking the content of this report and launching a proper investigation in collaboration with its authors?" asked Sophie Ekanga, a teacher from Mbandaka. She said she was disgusted that the Congolese authorities were again placing so little value on human life.

Few expect that anyone there will be an investigation, or that anyone will be prosecuted if executions are found to have taken place. Cyprian Abangapakwa, a retired judge, said "The Congolese judicial system, known to be very weak, is not the best institution for the job. Its members can still participate in a investigating committee.

"The fourteen Mbandaka magistrates - ill-equipped, poorly paid, badly housed, scattered throughout the city - are unable to carry out a proper investigation."

Update on the Foreclosure Case of Keith Sadler in Stony Ridge, Ohio

Update on the Foreclosure Case of Keith Sadler

The Toledo Foreclosure Defense League calls for a demonstration against the the State Bank and Trust, the bank that is foreclosing on Keith Sadler's home.

The demonstration will be on Wednesday, May 5, at 12 noon, at 610 East South Boundary Street; Perrysburg, OH 43551-2535.

This location is about a 5 minute drive away from Keith Sadler's home, which gives ample time to traverse back and forth should a raid occur while the public is at the bank.

For those that cannot attend the demonstration, you may also demonstrate your opposition to the bank's foreclosure by calling the bank and the sheriff at the following phone numbers:

Local bank branch: 419-874-2090
Bank HQ: 419-783-8950

Wood County Sheriff's office: 419-354-9001
Sheriff's direct line: 419-354-9008
Sheriff's personal email: wasyl@wcnet.org

Call and email often!

You are also encouraged to join a growing number of supporters who are gathering at Keith Sadler's home and staying for the duration. Supporters are encouraged to bring their tents and sleeping -bags there is plenty of space in his yard.

Background info:

On May 2, Sadler, along with five supporters barricaded themselves inside Sadler's home to protest his bank's foreclosing on his home of 20 years. "It's been home for me, my daughter and nephews for periods of time, my nine cats and this was my grandson's first home after he was born," Sadler told Moratorium NOW! members who traveled to a media conference and rally at his home today.

A longtime UAW member in various manufacturing plants, Sadler was unable to work after a repetitive strain injury became acute in July 2008. After being out of work for some time due to his injury and two surgeries on his right hand, Sadler's income decreased and thus it became a severe challenge for him to meet his mortgage payments. The bank foreclosed on his home in 2009 and refused any loan modification. Despite delaying court proceedings through various means and attempting to procure legal aid assistance, Sadler's home was sold to the bank at a Sheriff's sale in January 2010. Sadler was thereafter served with a notice of eviction for midnight, May 2.

"I basically did everything within the system to save my house and it all came to nothing. We are taking a stand. We are drawing a line in the sand and saying 'enough is enough.' We're standing up and we hope others will too. We want an indefinite moratorium on all foreclosures. Having people's homes stole right out from under them by the banks is not acceptable. We must fight back."

Supporters are encouraged to visit Sadler's home anytime. Call 419-309-7040 for schedule of activities.

Keith Sadler's home
5947 Fremont Pike
Stony Ridge, Ohio 43463
(Look for banners and placards on porch and trees)

Toledo Foreclosure Defense League Media spokesperson
Lance: 419-309-7040

Keith Sadler Foreclosure Resistance Live on UStream
http://www.ustream.tv/channel/keith-sadler-foreclosure-resistance-live

News coverage:
http://www.foxtoledo.com/dpp/news/ohio/Stony-Ridge-squatters-WUPW-50210

31 MDC-T Supporters Defect to ZANU-PF

31 MDC-T supporters defect to Zanu –PF

From George Maponga in Masvingo
Zimbabwe Herald

At least 31 MDC-T supporters here publicly denounced their party and joined Zanu-PF at the weekend.

Zanu-PF political commissar Cde Webster Shamu hailed them for their decision and reminded Zimbabweans to uphold the virtues of honesty and integrity which were the cornerstone of the successful execution of the war of liberation.

The former MDC-T supporters told a gathering comprising senior Zanu-PF leaders in Masvingo that they were fed up with empty rhetoric and had decided to go to the party that brought Independence.

All of them — who come from Masvingo North constituency — denounced MDC-T saying it was an instrument of imperialists to further their own interests that were alien to the aspirations of the majority of Zimbabweans. The new converts threw away their MDC-T party cards and regalia and pledged to fully support Zanu-PF because of its people-centred policies like the land reform programme and indigenisation of the economy. Cde Shamu led Zanu-PF officials in welcoming the group and gave them the party's regalia.

The political commissar said, "We should always remember that this country came as a result of a lot of sacrifice during the war of liberation and Zanu-PF as a party should always be guided by the wishes of the majority.

"Zanu-PF is a party of honesty and transparency and it demands as much from its leaders for it to retain the support of the masses. We do now want leaders who enrich themselves but we want leaders who serve the majority."

Quoting the Biblical parable of the prodigal son, Cde Shamu said former MDC-T supporters who had rejoined Zanu-PF were not supposed to be discriminated against.

Cde Shamu said Zanu-PF was a progressive revolutionary party.

"I want to appeal to Zanu-PF supporters and the leadership at various levels not to discriminate against them but speedily incorporate them into Zanu-PF structures because we are not a retributive but a progressive party," said Cde Shamu.

Masvingo North House of Assembly representative Cde Stan Mudenge (Zanu-PF) said he was relieved that people in his constituency were beginning to realise the "folly of backing MDC-T", which he said was a party without clear people-centred ideological direction.

Monday, May 03, 2010

The Legacy of the Bandung Conference

The Legacy of the Bandung Conference

By Norman (Otis) Richmond

It has been 55 years since so-called Third World nations from Asia and Africa came together in Bandung, Indonesia to promote economic and cultural cooperation and to oppose colonialism. History will record two Bandung Conferences: In 2005,a conference marking the golden jubilee of the first; and the one held in April 1955, at which 29 African and Asian nations jomet.

Africans in North America paid close attention to this historic event. In Toronto, Canada, Daniel Braithwaite's organization, which had a relationship with the U.S.-based Council on African Affairs (CAA), sent a message of support. Braithwaite was so impressed by CAA co-founder Paul Robeson that he not only started a CAA chapter in Toronto, he also named his own son Paul, currently a lawyer, in tribute to Robeson. Other Africanists like W.E.B. DuBois, Alphaeus and Dorothy Hunton, along with Robeson, were members of the Council on African Affairs.

The idea of the Bandung Conference came from Ahmed Sukarno of Indonesia. It was conceived in Colombo, Indonesia, where the Colombo Powers: India, Pakistan, Ceylon (now Sri Lanka), Burma (now Myanmar) and Indonesia (the host country) met in April 1954. The Bandung Conference led to the 1961 creation of the Non-Aligned Movement.

The first head of state to arrive at the 2005 Conference was former South African President Thabo Mbeki. Ironically, South Africa, along with Israel, Taiwan,and North and South Korea were all barred from the 1955 conference. In light of tragic events of 2005, Mbeki visited the tsunami-stricken province of Aceh before he proceeded to the Conference.

I first heard about the Bandung Conference in the mid-1960s while listening to a speech by El-Hajj Malik Shabazz (Malcolm X), titled "Message to the Grassroots,” which was first delivered at the King Solomon Baptist Church in Detroit on November 10, 1963. Malcolm talked about places and faces I had never heard of, however, he didn't get it completely correct. There were White people at the Bandung conference. Marshal Tito represented Yugoslavia, and there were American, Australian and numerous members of the European press at the Conference. In fact, African American journalist Ethel Payne, who was at Bandung, pointed out, “The British had sent just hordes of correspondents, and the Dutch and the Germans and all the European countries."

At the time of the first Bandung Conference, the North American left, in general, and the African American liberation movement, in particular, were under attack. Senator Joseph McCarthy was looking for a "red under every bed.” Robeson, "the Tallest Tree in Our Forest," wanted to attend the Conference but couldn't because the U.S. government had taken his passport. Ditto for DuBois. However, several African American politicians and journalists found themselves in Indonesia from April 18-25, 1955. Adam Clayton Powell Jr., Carl T. Rowan, Dr. Marguerite Cartwright, journalist Payne and Richard Wright all were there.

Powell, the Congressman from Harlem, went to the Conference on a dare. He wanted to attend the event to represent the interests of U.S. imperialism by talking about the progress the Negro in America was making. "It will mark the first time in history that the world's non-White people have held such a gathering," he told reporters in Washington, D.C., "and it could be the most important of this century." Powell, no matter what we think of him, knew what time it was. His appeals to President Dwight D. Eisenhower and others in the State Department fell on deaf ears. The flamboyant Powell was told the U.S. government saw no need to send an official observer to Bandung. However, he got there compliments of the African American weekly newspaper, New York Age-Defender.

Karl Evanzz pointed out in his brilliant book, The Judas Factor, "There was at least one unofficial observer: at the request of John Foster Dulles' brother, CIA Director Allen Dulles, a young African American journalist named Carl T. Rowan covered the conference."
Rowan went on to become the Director of the United States Information Agency. He also went on to alienate himself from a generation of African Americans after the February 21, 1965 assassination of Malcolm X. Rowan's statement after Malcolm's death was, "All this about an ex-convict, ex-dope peddler who became a racial fanatic."

Of the two female African American journalists at the Conference, the well-connected Dr. Cartwright represented a chain of White dailies and the United Nations. The lesser-known Payne was the new kid on the block and represented the Chicago Defender, which was part of John Sengstacke's chain of Black weeklies.

Payne, who went on to be crowned "The First Lady of the Black Press," said she had little or no contact in Indonesia with Dr. Cartwright. Of Cartwright, Payne said, "She had a desk at the U.N. and so she had quite a lot of access that I didn't have." However, Payne did network with writer Richard Wright, a one-time member of the Communist Party U.S.A. After he had left the Party, Wright wrote the book, Color Curtain, about The Bandung Conference.

Color Curtain was first published by University Press of Mississippi in 1956, and in it Wright wrote about the faces and places in 1955 Indonesia. In reading his book, one can feel him learning about what would come to be called "The Third World.”

The first Bandung Conference was attended by 21 Asian, 7 African and 1 Eastern European country. The second was attended by 54 Asian and 52 African nations. The Asian-African Conference has been transformed into the Asia-Africa Summit. A recent re-reading of Robeson's Here I Stand made me realize how important these two Conferences are to humanity. At both, questions of world peace, South-South cooperation, nuclear weapons and Palestine were discussed.

Toronto-based journalist and radio producer Norman (Otis) Richmond a.k.a. Jalali,can be heard on Diasporic Music on Uhuru Radio, every other Sunday from 2pm to 4pm on the net http://uhurunews.com/ He can be reached by e-mail Norman.o.richmond@gmail.com

Sunday, May 02, 2010

May Day Marches and Rallies Held in Over 70 Cities Throughout the U.S.; 35 Reported Arrested

May Day March in Detroit Draws Thousands in Support of Immigrant and Workers Rights

PANW Editor's Note: May Day in Detroit began at Patton Park and the crowd of several thousand marched to Clark Park. The event was organized by Latinos Unidos and supported by the Michigan Emergency Committee Against War & Injustice (MECAWI). Speakers at the rally in Clark Park represented the Farm Labor Organizing Committee (FLOC), Latinos Unidos and MECAWI.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

May 1, 2010

Immigration Advocates Rally for Change

By JULIA PRESTON
New York Times

WASHINGTON — In protests fueled by anger over a tough anti-illegal immigrant law in Arizona, tens of thousands of demonstrators joined marches and rallies Saturday in cities across the country, calling on Congress to pass an immigration overhaul.

In Los Angeles, the police said the crowd had peaked at 50,000. Protesters numbered 25,000 in Dallas, more than 10,000 in Chicago and Milwaukee, in the thousands in San Francisco and here in Washington, D.C., according to the police and independent estimates. Organizers said rallies and vigils were held in more than 70 places around the country.

In Washington, Representative Luis V. Gutierrez, Democrat of Illinois, was arrested after staging a sit-in on the sidewalk in front of the White House with about three dozen other people, in front of a crowd of thousands.

At a rally before he was arrested, Mr. Gutierrez, speaking in English and in Spanish, evoked memories of the civil rights movement of the 1960s.

“There are moments in which you say, ‘We will escalate this struggle,’ ” he said. “Today they will put handcuffs on us. But one day we will be free at last in the country we love.”

In all, 35 people were arrested in the sit-in, the United States Park Police said.

At rally after rally across the nation, protesters chanted “shame, shame, Arizona,” and carried signs saying, “Todos Somos Arizona,” or “We are All Arizona.”

The bigger demonstrations were far larger than planners had anticipated in March, when the events were first announced. The protests were originally called by immigrant advocates who had set May 1 as the deadline for Congress to introduce overhaul legislation that would include measures to give legal status to millions of illegal immigrants.

But organizers said the Arizona legislation, which was signed into law April 23, had been a watershed event for disparate advocate organizations, transforming them into something akin to a civil rights movement with a national profile.

The Arizona law made it a crime to be present in the state without legal immigration status and authorized the police to question people about their status based on a suspicion that they might be illegal immigrants.

Supporters of the law, including Gov. Jan Brewer of Arizona, a Republican, said the state had to act because the federal government had failed to enforce the immigration laws. Critics across the country said the law would lead to racial profiling and spread fear in immigrant communities.

In Los Angeles, protesters marched through the streets and held a crowded rally downtown, just down the street from the Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels.

Demonstrators waved American flags and signs, including one that said: “We Latinos are the Jews of the 21st century.” Mayor Antonio R. Villaraigosa told the crowd that a federal immigration overhaul was long overdue.

“Let me be clear about those laws that make suspects out of people based on the color of their skin,” Mr. Villaraigosa said. “They have no place in our great country.”

Cardinal Roger M. Mahony of Los Angeles drew cheers when he said, “Everyone in God’s eyes is legal.”

“Every time we have an economic downturn, there is a new attack on immigrants,” Cardinal Mahony said.

One Los Angeles protester, Dorien Grunbaum, 67, a teacher at a community college in the city, said she was there “primarily to support the immigrants in Arizona. I’m disgusted by what’s happening there,” Ms. Grunbaum said.

No overhaul legislation has been introduced in Congress, and President Obama said last week that lawmakers “may not have the appetite” for a volatile debate on immigration this year. A group of Democratic senators on Thursday presented an outline for an overhaul bill, written primarily by Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York.

In Washington, Mr. Gutierrez sat crossed-legged on the sidewalk in front of the White House at about 3 p.m., holding a small American flag and wearing a white T-shirt with red letters that read, “Arrest me not my friends.” The protesters each held letters that spelled out the message, “Obama, stop deporting our families.”

Mr. Gutierrez was handcuffed behind his back with plastic cuffs by the Park Police, and he walked in silence when an officer led him away along the black wrought-iron fence in front of the White House. Among others arrested with him were Jaime Contreras, director for Washington, D.C., of the Service Employees International Union; Joshua Hoyt, Ali Noorani, Deepak Bhargava, and Gustavo Torres, leaders of immigrant advocate organizations; and Gregory Cendana, president of the United States Student Association.

The protesters were arrested for violations of a regulation requiring people to keep moving when they pass in front of the White House, said Sergeant David Schlosser, a spokesman for the Park Police.

In Chicago, Mr. Obama’s hometown, thousands of people marched through downtown with signs that said, “Being brown is not a crime” and “Hey Obama! Don’t deport my mama.”

Many of the Chicago protesters expressed frustration at what they saw as the president’s lack of action on immigration.

Dulce Blanco, 48, was at the rally with a church group. She said she voted for Mr. Obama after attending a meeting where he said he would pass immigration reform. “If they don’t pass reform, we won’t vote for Obama again,” she said in Spanish.

Guadalupe Concepcion, a 22-year-old student in Chicago, began to cry during one of the speeches. She said she had been an illegal immigrant until she married her husband and that her parents faced discrimination because they are not here legally.

“The Arizona law is just plain racist,” she said. “It happened with African-Americans in the past, and now they want to do the same thing with us.”

Addressing the Chicago crowd, the Rev. Jesse Jackson encouraged a boycott of Arizona, saying the law would encourage racial profiling. “Arizona has become the Selma,” he said. “It is a showdown.”

In downtown Dallas, demonstrators gathered at the Cathedral Shrine of the Virgin of Guadalupe, named for the patroness of Mexico, and marched to City Hall. Many carried American flags, or draped them over their shoulders.

Among the widening reverberations from the Arizona law, the Alpha Phi Alpha Fraternity, a historically black organization whose members included Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. and Justice Thurgood Marshall, announced that it was moving its annual convention in July to Las Vegas from Phoenix. The fraternity said it had been expecting as many as 10,000 people, including members and their families, to come to the meeting.

The fraternity’s board decided that it could not host a meeting in a state with “a law that could put the civil rights and the very dignity of our members at risk during their stay in Phoenix,” said Herman Mason, the general president.

In Phoenix on Saturday, a far smaller and more subdued crowd of about 1,000 people gathered by 3 p.m. on the lawn at the State Capitol.

Most had handmade signs, including one with Governor Brewer wearing a black witch hat and reading “Jan Brewer: Arizona’s wicked witch of the West.”

The rally was primarily peaceful with the mostly Latino crowd marching around the Capitol, but a few arguments broke out with people who supported the law.

One demonstrator, Martina Paz, 42, of Phoenix, held a photograph of her 23-year-old son, Adan Buelna, who she said was in the Army stationed in Texas and was waiting to be deployed to the Middle East.

“My son will be protecting the rights and liberty of people on the other side of the world, but who is going to protect our rights here in Arizona,” Ms. Paz said.

She said that she feared that even though she and her husband have submitted applications to become legal residents, they will be stopped by the police and possibly be deported.

Lilly Fowler contributed reporting from Los Angeles, Ana Facio Contreras from Phoenix, Emma Graves Fitzsimmons from Chicago and James C. McKinley Jr. from Houston.

Taking a Stand for Political Prisoners in the U.S.

Taking a Stand for Political Prisoners in the U.S.

By asha bandele, AlterNet
Posted on April 30, 2010
http://www.alternet.org/story/146692/

It is 1990 and I am the newly elected student government president at Hunter College of the City University of New York. My political worldview, largely shaped heretofore by my active opposition to apartheid, Ronald Reagan and nuclear proliferation, is about to make a mighty leap forward. I know, then, that racism is a vise still choking Black people, even those of us born post the Civil Rights movement. I know the philosophy of Martin Luther King. I love Nelson and Winnie Mandela, and have even traveled Zimbabwe in the wake of its liberation struggle. I know some feminist theory, some feminist history. But for all the knowledge I have gathered at this point, I do not know enough to predict the learning curve I am about to embark upon, in large part because it is in this period that I meet Safiya Bukhari.

Under her mentorship I will come to have not only an intimate understanding of which political prisoners are in the U.S., but I will learn how to organize and run a defense campaign for them. Under her mentorship and because she led by example, I will learn never to downplay my leadership as a nod to the patriarchy that shapes, both silently and loud, the role of women in too many of our movements and organizations. Under her leadership, I will learn the power of human touch, the holding of hand of a man or woman who is about to enter their second generation locked down. I will learn patience; the first political prisoner case I worked on was for the New York 3 and it was 1991 and we were fighting to get them an evidentiary hearing; we did. But to get there, Safiya and I worked for months, including one long night where we stood for hours in a downtown New York law school and copied non-feedable onion skin page of transcript after another until all the thousands of them were done and we could get them to the attorneys who were volunteering their time. We lost that hearing but because we came within a hair's breadth of winning, and because we were just off the victories of Mandela on one side of the planet and Dhoruba on another, and mostly because I had come to deeply love Herman Bell, Jalil Muntaquim and Albert Nuh Washington, the loss shook me in all my naivité to the core. But at the moment when I could have given up, perhaps would have given up, I learned from Safiya Bukhari that we do indeed soldier on, that we come from a long-line of women and men who were kicked down, beaten down, shut down, shut up but got up and got up and got up again. She got up again and made me get up and went on to forge the New York Chapter of Mumia abu Jamal's support committee and organize the Jericho Movement, a call for the liberation of all U.S. political prisoners and prisoners of war.

The organization exists still today and is known nationally and internationally despite her death in 2003, a loss that put many of us, both behind the wall and not, on our collective knees. I was a pallbearer that mean August day we buried her and I remember feeling so profoundly as we carried her coffin up the stairs of the House of the Lord Church, what many of us feel when someone important to us dies: please God, can have just one more day, one more hour, one more hug or touch or kiss or moment in silence or laugh or cry or anything. Anything.

My call out to the Universe didn't come to pass that day, but on this day it has because I have my Safiya back with me when every time I pick up this important, this urgent new collection, The War Before: The True Life Story of Becoming a Black Panther, Keeping the Faith in Prison, & Fighting for Those Left Behind (The Feminist Press, 2010).

Edited by former political prisoner and former Weatherman Laura Whitehorn, this book which includes a forward by Angela Y. Davis, and an afterword by Mumia abu Jamal, has pulled together the political writings of woman who lived the sprit of transformation and with the unshakeable belief that a new world was possible. After her untimely death, Laura and Safiya's daughter, Wonda Jones, undertook the work of collecting and collating the organizer's writings and interviews into a comprehensive volume that is now this book, The WarBefore. Here I sit down with Laura to discuss who Safiya was and what we can learn from the vision of a woman, a wise and committed, loving and giving worker woman.

asha: What was your relationship to Safiya Bukhari?

I first met Safiya in the late 1990s, when I was in prison in California and she came to visit. She came in to see all the women political prisoners who were there at the time -- the Puerto Rican Independentistas Carmen Valentin, Alicia and Lucy Rodriguez, and Dylcia Pagan; my sister anti-imperialists (and my co-defendants) Marilyn Buck and Linda Evans; and me. It was one of many visits she made to prisoners during the organizing for a 1998 Jericho rally at the White House demanding recognition and amnesty for U.S. political prisoners. After my release in 1999, Safiya and I talked together at conferences and events, but I was not permitted to see her much because I was on parole. She died in 2003 while I was still on parole.

What was one of the most important things Safiya taught you?

From Safiya I drew a model of how to be serious about the work of supporting political prisoners. She knew from her own years behind bars the danger of promising prisoners you'll do things you can't deliver. She knew the critical importance of outside support. In her writings she says that while she was serving her eight-plus years in Goochland, Virginia, her biggest challenge was maintaining her sense of her own identity as a political person--as someone committed to fighting for justice. That is so opposite to what prisons are, it sometimes can feel like you are in a dream world. Her hard work in support of political prisoners, and the energy and joy--the sense of optimism--she brought to all of us was something I felt in my bones to be critical.

Again and again as I do this work, I remember what she said at a party when I got out of prison: When you leave prison, and you leave those others behind, it's like you leave part of you inside the institution. So you have to continue to do the work, because as long as there's a political prisoner -- any prisoner -- inside this country, that means that you're not truly free.

Given that this book was published posthumously, would you please talk a little bit about the process of gathering her papers and putting them into one collection?

Safiya had left a small manuscript of essays, including her own autobiographical narrative and a paper on sexism in the Black Panther Party, among other articles. Once those were all put into the computer and edited, though, it became clear that a huge part of Safiya's work was missing -- years of speeches, articles, and interviews reviewing the history of the Panthers and arguing that the people still doing time from those years should be supported and freed. We found some little-known pieces, such as a debate over whether the U.S. should grant amnesty to political prisoners -- the opposing team included some high-power government attorneys. We also found an article Safiya wrote describing post-traumatic stress disorder as a result of the government attack on the Panthers.

The first round of challenges was to choose amongst all these materials. At first I tended to want to include everything, because finding the items was sort of a process of discovery, and so many of them are historic. But it was clear that what was needed was not a recapitulation of every word Safiya had written or spoken, but rather a selection, to reflect the development of her thinking and, more importantly, the history of the movements she was part of. For example, Safiya considered at various points the nature of divisions within Left organizations, and how those allowed the government to use provocateurs and informants to divide groups and ultimately destroy them. She returned several times to that theme, and to the question of how individual weaknesses played a role. She tied those themes, again and again, to the overriding theme of how Black people and other oppressed people can struggle for justice in this country. No small task.

At each point, Wonda and I tried to be objective and yet faithful to what Safiya might have wanted. She did not set out to write a book; she was an organizer. We hope that the book will not only be educational but also agitational--that, as Angela Davis writes in the foreword, "readers of The War Before will commit themselves to the campaign to bring Assata Shakur home, and to freeing Mumia, Leonard Peltier, and every one of the human beings for whom Safiya Bukhari so passionately gave her life."

What makes this book different than other books written by Black Panthers?

This book is unique precisely because Safiya did not try to write a book. The War Before consists of primary source material--Safiya's accounts of life in the Black Panther Party as it was happening; her thoughts and reflections at several points during her history -- rather than a retrospective summing up of the history and her conclusions about it. Safiya's writings about the Panthers have an in-the-moment quality that I think is similar only to Mumia Abu-Jamal's book, We Want Freedom. Safiya allows the reader to participate in the conclusions she is suggesting, rather than presenting a summary of those conclusions.

The War Before is also not a polemic. Safiya considers various points of view about the history of the liberation movements. She is above all self-aware, self-critical, honest. She is not protecting her own decisions and role, she is questioning those, looking for answers rather than asserting them. Unlike many books about the 60s and 70s, Safiya's writings assert again and again that the history of that era is not frozen in the past. She talks intimately about the members of the Black Panther Party who remain in prison, and how that reality belies any sense that the battles the Panthers fought are over and done, relics of the past. One of the most moving sections of the book involves a discussion between Safiya and a former Panther who was then dying in prison, Albert Nuh Washington. In the discussion, only a few months before his death, Nuh talks about their shared history and its significance. He, too, is re-evaluating, considering the past as living history that continues to exert influence on what we do now and how we see the world.

What do we learn as women about the Panthers and the Black Power movement from this book?

In addition to a thoughtful essay on sexism and the Black Panther Party, Safiya writes and speaks frequently about the role of women. From those specific writings, we glean a sense of how women influenced the Party toward programs dealing with the basic needs of the Black community. But her writings elucidate a much deeper importance of the role of women in the Black Power movement: She shows that militancy is much more than standing up to U.S. state power in demonstrations, or with guns. By the end of "The War Before" I think readers will understand that true militancy does not exist in how we act, but in what we struggle for--and in how consistently we struggle. Safiya's power lay very much in her willingness to keep fighting. She kept fighting for political prisoners when many others had given up. As Cleo Silvers, another former Black Panther, put it, Safiya showed not only how to be a revolutionary woman during a revolutionary period but, more important, how to be a revolutionary woman during a very non-revolutionary time. The other thing I think Safiya teaches us about the role of women concerns the nature of solidarity. The way Safiya writes about political ideals is not abstract. What we are fighting for, she shows us, is an extension of the best in human beings who rise out of oppression and construct liberation. She shows us her feelings, too, and reflects a depth of collectivity very different from what we see in other histories of the second half of the twentieth century.

What do you think Safiya would say the most urgent issue for people to be working on today is?

For Safiya, the continued incarceration of people like Herman Bell and Jalil Muntaqim, Mumia Abu-Jamal, Russell Maroon Shoatz and Eddie Conway -- former Black Panthers who remain behind bars for up to 40 years and more--demanded urgent attention and action. I think she would say that many struggles are critical, but that if we do not fight to release our comrades then our movements will suffer. But from Safiya's writings you get a sense of an ongoing struggle. And I think you get a picture of a struggle that has not been won, but has not been lost. That is a very different sense of the history of the Black Panther Party than you get from many other sources. So I think that really Safiya would say, if you are fighting for justice, you are doing the most urgent work there is to be done.

asha bandele is an award-winning author and journalist whose most recent book is Something Like Beautiful: One Single Mother’s Journey (HarperCollins, 2009)

Burkino Faso Offers Niger 5,000 Tons of Cereals to Help Fight Famine

18:31, April 30, 2010

Burkina Faso offers Niger 5,000 tons of cereals to help fight famine

Burkina Faso has offered 5, 000 tons of cereals to Niger to help fight famine, which is threatening nearly half of its 11 million population, according to the government.

The humanitarian aid is a token of friendly relations and good neighborhood between the two African countries and is part of efforts to save the Sahalian children and women being affected by hunger, a cabinet report said on Thursday.

Niger also donated food and other kinds of relief worth 50 million FCFA to help victims of floods in Burkina Faso in September 2009.

Food shortages are currently threatening other countries of the Sahalian strip, including Chad, Mauritania, Burkina Faso and Mali, the UN food agency FAO said in a recent report, calling for international aid to the African countries.

Burkina Faso began to sell cereals at subsidized prices in March in the northern part of the country which was the most affected with the famine.

The World Food Program has opened centers in Ouagadougou and Bobo Dioulasso to distribute free kits of rice, sugar and oil to the most vulnerable households.

Source: Xinhua

Nepal Maoists Call For General Strike at May Day Rally

Saturday, May 01, 2010
17:51 Mecca time, 14:51 GMT

Nepal Maoists call general strike

Dahal said the nationwide strike would be 'peaceful' and that the Maoists were open to dialogue

Nepal's Maoists have announced a general strike beginning on Sunday after the country's prime minister refused to heed calls for him to step down.

At least 150,000 people had gathered in Kathmandu, the capital, on Saturday to show their support for the Maoists' demand.

"We're compelled to call for an indefinite strike from tomorrow because of the government's lack of concern about taking the peace and constitution-making processes forward," Pushpa Kamal Dahal, the Maoist leader, told the crowd.

Dahal, also known by his nom de guerre Prachanda, promised that the nationwide shutdown would be "peaceful" and the "door for dialogue" remained open.

Dahal briefly led a coalition government after winning polls in 2008, but resigned from government last year when he was prevented from dismissing the army chief.

The Maoists still hold the largest number of seats in parliament.

Political impasse

Madhav Kumar Nepal, the country's prime minister, said that bringing the nation to a halt would do nothing to strengthen democracy and appealed to the Maoists, formally called the Communist Party of Nepal, to call off the strike.

"Shutting down the nation is not the way to find a solution to this impasse," he said in a live television address.

"All-party consensus is the only alternative that will pave the way forward."

About 15,000 riot police were deployed across Kathmandu for Saturday's protest, but the event passed without violence.

Demonstrators waved red flags and chanted "dissolve this puppet government and set up a national government".

Shops and businesses were closed and residents were stockpiling food in fear that supplies might run short in the event of a national shutdown.

As demonstrators were massing for the rally, the Maoists were meeting representatives of other major parties to try to break the political deadlock.

Karin Landgren, the chief of United Nations peace mission in Nepal, said she had met Maoists leaders to appeal for peaceful resolution.

"I am deeply concerned that despite these peaceful intentions, potential spoilers of the peace process could provoke a clash," Landgren said on Friday.

The Maoists fought government troops until 2006 when they gave up their decade-old uprising and joined a peace process.

Source: Al Jazeera and agencies

Riot Police Clash With Greek Protesters Over Cuts

May 1, 2010

Riot police clash with Greek protesters over cuts

Robin Henry Tear gas has been fired at demonstrators in Greece protesting against the government’s planned austerity cuts to save their failing economy.

Thousands of left-wing and union demonstrators have descended on Athens for a march to oppose the wage cuts, tax rises and pension reductions being proposed.

Riot police deployed tear gas into the crowds after protesters hurled rocks at the Finance Ministry this morning.

There were similar scenes in the northern city of Thessaloniki as youths attacked business premises, smashing store fronts and ATMs.

Greece must cut it’s budget deficit by 24 billion euros to secure a £120 billion loan from the European Union and International Monetary Fund for the next three years.

The details of the cuts will not be revealed until after the loan is secured, but Prime Minister George Papandreou has warned the country to prepare for a period of hardship.

The French government said today it hopes to have a deal agreed by the end of the weekend.

Without the loan the financially crippled country will almost certainly default on its debts, which would not only be devastating for its own economy, but send shockwaves throughout the eurozone.

However many Greeks are opposing the austerity drive and a number of left-wing groups have vowed to escalate the public protests.

Saturday’s demonstration marched passed the Athens offices of the European Union and US Embassy.

Nikos Diamantopoulos, who was participating in a rally organized by pro-Communist unions, said: “These measures are death. How people are going to live tomorrow, how they’re going to survive, I do not understand.”

Left Coalition leader Alexis Tsipras told reporters at one of the Athens rallies: “The Greek people do not owe anything to anybody. Those who have brazenly robbed public money and pension funds.”

Government spending in Greece has run-up debts equalling 115 percent of the gross domestic product, resulting in a lowering of their economy’s credit rating. Last week the country’s debts were downgraded to “junk” status, sparking a drop in the value of the euro and fears of a “contagion effect” in the similarly vulnerable south European economies of Spain and Portugal.

United Nations Says Rebels Operating in Congo Killed Scores in Attack on Village in Northeast

May 1, 2010

U.N. Says Congo Rebels Killed Scores in Attack on Village in the Northeast

By JEFFREY GETTLEMA
New York Times

KISANGANI, Congo — United Nations officials said Saturday that the Lord’s Resistance Army rebel force killed up to 100 people in a previously unreported massacre in the remote northeastern corner of this country.

Details are still emerging of exactly what happened. But according to John Holmes, the United Nation’s top humanitarian official, the L.R.A. struck a small village in February, two months after it killed more than 300 people from several villages in the surrounding area.

United Nations investigators have spoken with several witnesses and victims of the massacre in February, including two fishermen who said they saw dozens of bodies.

But the investigators have been unable to reach the exact location because of the difficulties of traveling in one of the most rugged and isolated corners of Africa.

Mr. Holmes said that while recent military operations may have weakened the L.R.A., “they are still capable of wreaking absolute havoc — and they still do.”

He said he learned about the February attack on Saturday, when he met with local authorities and victims in Niangara, an old trading post hidden away in the Congolese jungle that has recently been ringed by roving bands of L.R.A. marauders.

One of the people he met was a young woman whose lips had been sliced off last month. She was attacked by rebels while working in her field, she said Saturday, sitting in a hospital bed, her face a mask of gauze and tape.

“They told me I was talking too much,” she said.

The L.R.A. has been waging a brutal and bizarre rebellion for more than 20 years, starting in northern Uganda in the late 1980s.

Originally, it said it was guided by the Ten Commandments, but soon it was breaking every one, massacring and mutilating civilians and becoming notorious for kidnapping young children and turning them into 4-foot-tall killing machines.

The Ugandan Army eventually drove the L.R.A. out of Uganda but the rebels simply marched into neighboring northeastern Congo, where they set up bases in isolated areas.

Recently, the Ugandan military has killed dozens of fighters hiding out in Congo and the Central African Republic, though the L.R.A.’s leader, Joseph Kony, who has been indicted by the International Criminal Court on crimes against humanity, is still on the loose.

In the December massacre, the L.R.A. killed more than 300 people in a brutal recruitment campaign near Niangara, in which a few dozen rebel fighters abducted hundreds of civilians, marching them in a human chain from village to village. Along the way, the fighters beat to death men, women and children they did not want to keep in their ranks.

“For anyone saying that the L.R.A. is finished, I would be careful not to count them out,” Mr. Holmes said. “They have an amazing capacity to regenerate themselves, especially by kidnapping children.”

Saturday, May 01, 2010

Bombs Hit Mosque in Somalia's Capital

May 1, 2010

Bombs Hit Mosque in Somalia’s Capital, Killing Dozens

By JEFFREY GETTLEMAN and MOHAMED IBRAHIM
New York Times

Dozens of people were killed on Saturday in a rare mosque bombing in Somalia’s capital, Mogadishu, in what may be a sign of increased bloodletting between Islamist insurgent groups.

According to witnesses, two powerful bombs ripped through a mosque in Bakaro market, an infamous trading den that has been under insurgent control for years. Several worshipers were killed, and some elders said a high-ranking commander of the Shabab insurgent group who preached there on Saturday may have been among the wounded.

In the past few months, as Somalia’s weak transitional government has been gearing up for a major offensive, tensions have been steadily rising between the country’s two most dangerous rebel groups, the Shabab and Hizbul Islam, both of which have strong presences in Bakaro. The two used to be close, and their hard-line Islamist ideologies, which called for amputations and public stonings, were virtually indistinguishable.

But their partnership has been souring. They have openly clashed several times in recent months, and this spring, a large explosion rocked another Shabab hide-out, leaving dozens dead. Somali security services blamed that on feuding between Islamist factions.

Describing the attack on Saturday, Abdulkadir Omar, who owns a stationery shop nearby, called it “a shocking event.”

“I saw more than 17 people removed from the mosque,” he said. “And then we couldn’t get access, because Shabab militias besieged the area.”

A few minutes later, the second bomb went off outside the mosque. Witnesses estimated between 25 and 40 people were killed in total.

The Shabab’s official spokesman, Sheik Ali Mohamoud Rageh, who often addresses journalists in Somalia by conference calls from unknown locations, blamed foreign mercenaries working for the government for the attack.

He also fueled speculation that one of the Shabab’s most senior commanders, Fuad Mohamed Khalaf, whose assets were recently frozen by the United State on suspicion of terrorist activities, was among the wounded. Witnesses said Mr. Khalaf frequently preached at the mosque, and had again on Saturday, finishing just around noon when the first bomb exploded.

“We are to sorry to inform you that a religious scholar who was teaching at the mosque was seriously wounded,” Sheik Ali said. He did not specify who that was. But many elders in Mogadishu said that was indeed Mr. Khalaf.

The attack was presaged earlier this week by an explosion outside another mosque in the same neighborhood, though it is not clear how many people were killed or wounded.

As Somalia’s Islamist fighters have drawn closer to Al Qaeda and recruited foreign fighters, including even some Americans, the number of Iraq-style suicide attacks and roadside bombs has steadily increased. But until now, mosques had seemed to be off limits. Many Somalis fear this bombing could mark a new wave of attacks on civilians.

At the same time, fighting continues between the government and the rebels. On Saturday night, the Hodan neighborhood in Mogadishu became yet another engulfed in combat, when a government-allied militia tried to drive out insurgents. Witnesses said that at least one person was killed and several wounded.

The United States has provided millions of dollars of military aid to Somalia’s transitional government in the hopes that it can quash the rebels and seize back the capital. Right now, government troops control only small slices of the city and poisonous political divisions within the government threaten to imperil any upcoming military operations.

Zimbabwe President Mugabe Urges ZANU-PF Party Members to Uphold Founding Principles

President urges party members to uphold founding principles

Herald Reporter

President Mugabe yesterday urged Zanu-PF members to respect the party’s founding principles and ensure ordinary people continue to play a leading role in its affairs.

The President said this when he officially relaunched the party’s website at Zanu-PF’s headquarters in Harare yesterday.

"We are a people-oriented and revolutionary party and that aspect must continue to ring loud and clear from the party.

"The spokesmen of the party should proudly blow their trumpets; they are allowed to do so," he said.

President Mugabe said the indigenisation programme was meant to replicate the situation with land reforms though in a different manner. "What has happened to land must apply to other socio-economic sectors — that is the principle, that is why we came up with the Indigenisation (Act).

"We say to ourselves, our approach should not exactly be the same that we applied to land, that we apply a system which is statutory-based," President Mugabe said.

Government in February gazetted the Indigenisation and Economic Empowerment Regulations that operationalise the Indigenisation Act and outline procedures to be followed during the process.

President Mugabe has said the regulations would not be reversed despite opposition from some sectors of society opposed to the empowerment of the formerly disadvantaged black majority.

Speaking after the relaunch, Zanu-PF secretary for information and publicity Cde Rugare Gumbo encouraged people to visit the site and learn about the party and Zimbabwe’s history.

"This is an encouraging development and those people inside and outside the country should visit the site and see what the party has done and intends to do and what it stands for," he said.China to help build 2 electricity plants


China to Assist in Construction of Two Electricity Plants

Herald Reporter

THE Chinese government will assist Zimbabwe construct two electricity plants and a biogas facility in the next three years among various other developmental initiatives, Beijing’s Ambassador in Harare, Mr Xin Shunkang, has said.

He said this at a special performance by Shanghai Acrobat and Dance Group for President Mugabe at the Harare International Conference Centre yesterday.

The ambassador said China would install giant televisions in Harare to ensure as many people as possible get to watch the 2010 Fifa Soccer World Cup in South Africa.

"In the next three years, China will help Zimbabwe to build one more primary school and one secondary school; build one solar generating station and one hydropower station; establish a biogas project, build a new hospital and some boreholes," he said.

Ambassador Xin said China will also second more agricultural experts and reassured Zimbabwe of Beijing’s continued support.

"We will send more agricultural experts to Zimbabwe and provide more financial support. I reassure you that China will stand with Zimbabwe and is ready to further strengthen the existing China-Zimbabwe friendship," he said.

The Chinese ambassador said Zimbabwean businesspeople should take advantage of the World Expo that opened yesterday in Shanghai to seek investment.

"It is another historical moment for China to attract more than 200 countries and at least 700 million visitors including our Zimbabwean friends."

President Mugabe thanked the Chinese group for its performance saying it demonstrated the cordial relations between the two countries.

"Your coming to Zimbabwe demonstrates the very warm relationship, very intimate relationship, that is there between the people of China and Zimbabwe.

"I want to assure you that it is not just the performance by some people but people who are close to our hearts; our true friends.

"You are here among the closest of your friends, you are here — therefore — in your second home," he said.

President Mugabe had the audience, which included various Cabinet ministers and other dignitaries, in stitches when he jokingly warned the acrobats not to break themselves.

"Continue your good work, but don’t break yourselves," he said.

While the audience was still drying its tears, President Mugabe added that Zimbabweans could not replicate such agile performances because they were "too fat", eliciting more laughter.

He described the performance as a sign of intensive training and discipline.

"It is a demonstration of real discipline and intensive training and a high element of dance and rhythm very, very rare to see in our own society and I would want to congratulate the acrobats and dancers for this very impressive show they have provided," said President Mugabe.