Sunday, February 28, 2016

Somalia: Five Intelligence Officers Killed in Mogadishu Car Bomb
MOGADISHU, Somalia-Thunderous explosions have rocked Mogadishu’s SYL hotel, just a few meters away from Villa Somalia presidential compound on Friday, Garowe Online reports.

Gunfire could be heard around the area where suspected Al Shabaab militants targeted with what seems to be apparently coordinated terror attack.

The car bomb attack occurred near an entertainment facility called ‘Peace Square’.

Families spend time with children there every Friday.

 Five intelligence officers and four attackers have been reported killed in a gun-battle ensued after car bombing.

Al Shabaab right away claimed responsibility for the attack that rattled the whole city on BBC and websites.

On Thursday, militants fired mortar shells on to Villa Somalia, killing three people from the same family in the barrage of mortar rounds.

GAROWE ONLINE


Shabab Militants Claim Deadly Attack on Hotel in Somalia

By MOHAMMED IBRAHIM
New York Times
FEB. 26, 2016

MOGADISHU, Somalia — Somali militants on Friday attacked a popular hotel and a nearby public garden in Mogadishu, the capital, killing at least 10 people and wounding more than 25, witnesses and officials said.

The Shabab, an Islamist extremist group, claimed responsibility for the attack. Four Shabab militants were killed in the clash, security officials said.

Somali security officials said that the attack began when explosives loaded into at least two vehicles were detonated close to a security checkpoint near the garden, killing two guards.

Gunmen using another car bomb then attacked the SYL Hotel and tried to storm the building, but they were stopped by members of the security forces, according to the National Intelligence and Security Agency. A total of four militants were killed at the two sites, security officials said.

There were conflicting reports about the number of civilian casualties. With a large number of people suffering wounds from the explosions, the death toll could rise, officials said.

The garden, known as the Peace Garden, is a popular attraction in the capital, especially on Fridays, when families tend to visit. The hotel, which is not far from the presidential palace in Mogadishu, often draws government officials and business people for meetings.

On Thursday, the Shabab militants claimed responsibility for a mortar attack that was believed to have been aimed at the presidential palace but fell short, killing at least three civilians and wounding at least eight.

Mogadishu has been plagued by violence for decades, after Somalia’s government collapsed in 1991. In recent years the city has struggled to enjoy something of a renaissance, attracting millions of dollars of new investment, which has helped build many hotels, restaurants and shops.

But the Shabab has not gone away. Assassinations and car bombings carried out by the group have become the city’s steady background noise. Many of the biggest hotels have been bombed, and in recent months the Shabab have stepped up their attacks across Somalia.

Many analysts warn of a Shabab comeback and say that unless Somalia’s leaders generate genuine popular support, the militants will be difficult to defeat. But Somalis widely suspect that their leaders are corrupt, which hinders the government’s efforts to mobilize support.

Jeffrey Gettleman contributed reporting from Nairobi, Kenya.



Sudan’s Ruling Party and DUP to Review Troubled Political Partnership
February 27, 2016 (KHARTOUM) - A joint committee between Sudan’s ruling National Congress Party (NCP) and the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) led by Mohamed Osman al-Merghani will discuss Tuesday the latter’s reservations about its participation in the government.

Last week, Sudan’s presidential aide and the de facto chairman of the DUP, Mohamed al-Hassan al-Merghani, threatened to withdraw from the government, saying no real job has been assigned to him since assuming office last year.

Al-Hassan further distributed a questionnaire among his party leaders and sectors seeking their ruling on whether to continue to join or pull out from the government.

Well-informed sources told Sudan Tribune that a joint committee including four members from each party has been formed to discuss the DUP’s reservations.

The same sources said the members of the committee from the DUP side include the minister of human development and labor in Khartoum state Osama Hassoun, the deputy parliament speaker Aisha Salih, the chairman of the DUP’s parliamentary bloc Ibrahim Mahgoub and the MP Ahmed al-Tayeb al-Mikabrabi.

According to the sources, the DUP members of the joint committee were selected by al-Hassan who is currently staying abroad.

Meanwhile, Sudan Tribune learnt that the members of the joint committee from the NCP side include the presidential aide Ibrahim Mahmoud Hamid, the head of the political sector Mustafa Osman Ismail and the political secretary Hamid Mumtaz.

A leading DUP figure said the joint committee will hold its first meeting on Tuesday to review the DUP’s participation in the executive and legislative bodies at both federal and states levels “quantitatively and qualitatively”.

He added the DUP would propose the political dossiers that must be assigned to its representatives in the government in order “to ensure that their participation in the government is real not decorative”.

He described the joint committee as the “final opportunity” to ensure the continuation of the partnership between the DUP and the NCP, saying its recommendations would determine the future of the DUP participation in the government.

The DUP left opposition ranks and joined the “broad-based” government of the NCP in December 2011, citing the “need to save the country” in the words of the party leader, Mohamed Osman al-Mirghani.

It is worth to mention that al-Hassan, who is the son of the DUP leader, has orchestrated the party’s participation in the general elections of last April despite stiff opposition from senior DUP figures.

The decision of one of Sudan’s biggest opposition parties to join the government has created a great deal of internal dissent that saw many members quitting in protest.

The party received the post of a presidential assistant and three ministries in the federal cabinet and continues to serve under this allocation.
South Sudanese Journalist Shot and Wounded in Wau State
February 27, 2016 (WAU) - A South Sudanese journalist working as a technician at Wau Radio station was Friday night shot and wounded by an unknown gunman.

Narrating his ordeal, Alfonse Ernest Makuei said a South Sudanese army (SPLA) soldier attacked him as he returned home from a club at about 7:00pm.

“I was coming from the club to my house and one of my neighbours was ahead of me. As she branched aside towards her house, person who shot me called me saying stop and I thought he was lost and needed help,” Makuei told Sudan Tribune Saturday.

Till now, it remains unclear why the soldier shot the radio technician, and neither army officials nor state authorities could comment on the matter.

The wounded journalist is reportedly undergoing treatment in Wau town.

Last year, five journalists were killed when unidentified gunmen ambushed an official convoy in South Sudan’s Western Bahr al Ghazal state, according to local journalists and news reports. The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) condemned the attack and called on authorities to apprehend the perpetrators and hold them accountable.

Press freedom in South Sudan has deteriorated since the country gained its independence in 2011, according to sources who spoke to CPJ in late 2014. Government security forces raided and briefly shut down numerous media outlets in Juba in 2014, and local journalists told CPJ they feared covering sensitive topics and censored themselves.

(ST)
SPLA Forces Desert Deployment Areas in Wau Due to Lack of Food, Ammunition
February 26, 2016 (BAGARI) – The soldiers of the South Sudan’s national army have started to desert their areas of deployment in the newly created Wau state due to lack of food and ammunition.

Some deserting soldiers who spoke to Sudan Tribune on condition of anonymity on Friday said they have been deployed in parts of Wau county in Bagari and Ngiso areas since last year to protect the civilians from the rebels but they decided to leave the areas because they are not being given food.

“We are there without enough ammunition and we are just close to the enemy. They used to attack our positions on daily basis but we have no ammunitions and heavy weapons that is why we are falling out,” said a soldier who declined to be identified .

“We are just about 100 troops controlling many areas but now we have come back to our headquarters in the town so that we can see if the administration should provide us with our needs or we remain in the town,” he further said.

Meanwhile, top military officers and state government officials close to the office of the state governor have accused the South Sudan’s chief of general staff, Paul Malong Awan, of being behind the crisis in Wau.

A top military officer in the Fifth Infantry Division in Wau said Malong has deployed across Wau town his private soldiers who have been responsible for looting and night killings of members of non Dinka ethnic groups in Wau town.

“Yes Mathiang – Anyor armed forces of Malong are in Wau and are not listening to our commands, who are in charge [of the] army in the state,” said the officer.

One of the state officials close to the office of the state governor, said Malong’s forces have been in Wau for the past two years after they were requested by the former governor Rizik Zecharia Hassan, to come to the state.

He said their mission was to protect the civilians in the area, but instead allegedly turned into “criminals” themselves, killing, looting and torturing the residents of Wau town.

Malong is accused of recruiting 10 thousands soldiers from Western Bahr el-Ghazal. However the SPLA headquarters denied the accusations several times.

(ST)
Tunisia Grapples With Racism, Violence Against Sub-Saharans
Daniel Levine-Spound
Saturday 27 February 2016 21:57 UTC

TUNIS - In early November, the badly bruised face of a Cameroonian university student made waves in Tunisia. Walking through Tunis' El Aouina neighbourhood, the 23-year-old law student was allegedly violently assaulted by four Tunisian men.

Days earlier, a group of Tunisians had assaulted a Congolese student in the same neighbourhood.

While the attacks in Tunis provoked outrage on social media, Sub-Saharan students and activists say they represent a wider challenge faced by their community ­‑- a phenomenon tied up in a relationship with Tunisia's deposed leader, Zine El Abidine Ben Ali.

While Ben Ali's fall in 2011 led to the creation of a new Tunisian constitution lauded as one of the most progressive in the region, Sub-Saharan students and activists say the country's laws still leave them vulnerable at a time when their community, perceived as privileged under the dictator, has seen a spike in violence against it.

“We are a lot more anxious now,” Hubert Ondo, project manager with the Association of African Students and Interns in Tunisia (AESAT), established in 1993 to advocate on behalf of Tunisia’s Sub-Saharan community and promote Sub-Saharan culture. “Under Ben Ali, people were too scared to attack foreigners. And if they had, the police would have responded. Now, we don’t know whether there will be an investigation.”

Lawmakers say they are aware of the problems, but are struggling against both the workload of a country in transition and a culture that won't change overnight.

“We are in the midst of re-making the institutions of the republic. Parliament is working around the clock, and hundreds of laws are pending," said Youssef Tlili, a member of Nidaa Tounes, the political party of Tunisian President Baji Caid Essebsi.

Tlili said politicians are working “to accelerate the process of finding solutions to the problem of racism, a disease that plagues all societies", but cautions that it will take more than laws.

“If we passed an anti-racism law today, what would that change?" Tlili asked. "We need to change the mentality."

'Friend of the community'?

Just months before the double attacks in El Aouina, violence had erupted across the country after Tunisia’s loss to Equatorial Guinea in the Africa Cup of Nations. After the match, in Tunis neighbourhoods including El Nasr and Ariana, and other cities like Sfax, mobs of Tunisian fans attacked Sub-Saharans, as well as other Tunisians attempting to defend them.

“Certain people were shouting, ‘Go home! Ben Ali isn’t here anymore,’” said Blamassi Toure, programme officer at the Tunis-based Maison du Droit et des Migrations, an organisation supporting Tunisian civil society groups, focused on migrant and refugee rights. “For many Tunisians, Ben Ali was a friend of the African community.”

The perceived connection between Ben Ali and the Sub-Saharan community stems largely from the African Development Bank (AfDB). One of the world’s largest international financial institutions, the AfDB is normally based in the Ivory Coast.

However, following the outbreak of the Ivorian civil war in 2002, the Ben Ali government welcomed the bank to temporarily relocate to Tunisia, where the AfDB remained headquartered until 2014.

As thousands of well-off Sub-Saharan bank employees and their families arrived in the capital, Ben Ali warned Tunisians against any mistreatment of the newcomers, Toure said.

“The Ministry of the Interior told the population to be very careful because they are the president’s invited guests,” said Toure. “Nothing bad is to happen to them.”

Along with the bank employees came the students from across Sub-Saharan Africa enrolling in Tunisia’s private, francophone universities. The timing was right. It had become progressively harder for students to obtain visas to the EU. Tunisia, on the other hand, automatically granted visas to citizens of numerous Sub-Saharan countries. For Sub-Saharan students seeking to study abroad, Tunis rapidly developed into an attractive plan B.

“Ben Ali had done everything possible to ensure that the situation in Tunisia was good for Sub-Saharans,” said Hubert Ondo, Project Manager at AESAT.

By 2009, about 12,000 Sub-Saharan students – six times more than the year after the bank had relocated to Tunis – were studying in Tunisia, according to AESAT.

With foreign students often spending several thousands of euros per year, the influx of Sub-Saharans was a boon for the country’s universities in particular and the Tunisian economy in general.

Or 'friend to no one'?

While the AfDB’s arrival was undoubtedly a turning point, public cooperation between the Sub-Saharan community and Ben Ali goes back even further.

In 1993, when few Tunisian civil society organisations had the right to operate legally, AESAT received state-sponsored office space and financial support. At the time, the government’s treatment of the organisation indicated to some that there was more to the relationship between the group and Ben Ali’s regime. Others however, thought AESAT's treatment might be a propaganda tool to show the world that Tunisia was open to foreigners.

For Toure, the group’s legal recognition ultimately served as a mechanism for surveillance.

Located directly across the street from a police station, the government-provided AESAT office “allowed the state to monitor the comings and goings of the Sub-Saharan community. Beginning in 2000, telephone conversations were bugged,” Toure said.

By monitoring communication and requiring AESAT to seek authorisation before working with Tunisian organisations, the government sought to control the Sub-Saharan community’s activities and influence, he added.

“Ben Ali wasn’t a friend to the Sub-Saharans,” Toure said. “He was a friend to no one.”

Whatever the exact nature and motivation behind Ben Ali’s relationship with AESAT and the AfDB, the perceived privilege of Sub-Saharans provoked anger among the wider populace, a frustration that is directly related to the recent spike in violence, experts say.

“Before the revolution, Sub-Saharan Africans and foreigners in general were well protected by the government,” said Jonathan Bahago, president of Afrique Intelligence. "If you touched a Sub-Saharan, my goodness, what the police would do to you!”

“But since the revolution,” he said, “there have been more attacks against Sub-Saharans, with people saying: ‘The one who was defending you before is gone’.”

Hard statistics on crimes committed against the Sub-Saharan community are hard to come by. In 2013, the Tunisian Interior Ministry launched Open Data, a website through which anyone can access a wide range of government statistics.

But while the programme includes crime data, no mention is made of “hate crimes,” or other attacks against specific communities. AESAT hopes to eventually create an effective data-gathering system, but currently doesn’t have one in place.

‘A rage I did not understand’

It’s also likely that a large proportion of attacks against Sub-Saharans go unreported.

“Most of the time, they are quite scared to go to the police,” said Anais El Bassil, coordinator of the Maison du Droit et des Migrations, which encourages victims to report attacks and provides financial assistance for legal fees.

Current students from Sub-Saharan countries studying in Tunisia agreed that there is fear about reporting assaults, including their own.

Grace, a student in management from Congo-Brazzaville, said she was in the north Tunis neighbourhood of El Nasr when several teenagers tried to steal her purse. When she resisted, the situation quickly escalated.

“They began throwing rocks at me and I had to run. One of my neighbours saw what was happening and came to my defence. He wanted to go to the police, but I didn’t want to. What would that accomplish? They’re not going to do anything,” she said.

Mariette, an IT student from Burundi, had a similar experience. In January, during the same month as the post-soccer attacks, a man robbed her at knifepoint in downtown Tunis. After stealing her bag, he continued to attack “with a rage I did not understand,” she said.

Her hand bleeding profusely, Mariette said she managed to flag down a passing car, whose driver pulled over to help. When the police arrived, she sensed their hostility.

“You could tell that they didn’t care what had happened. Whatever you did, you could see that the investigation would not go far,” she said.

One week later, her hand still healing from the knife wound, Mariette came across her attacker on the street. Though she immediately realised that he lived in the same neighbourhood, she didn’t bother alerting the police.

“As I knew who he was, I could’ve pressed charges. But I knew that nothing would come of it,” she said.

While concerned about violence against his community, Toure emphasised that recent attacks must be understood in context.

“Tunisia is going through a difficult period,” he said. “Clearly, there is racism. But there is also insecurity, which affects Tunisians as well as foreigners.”

Undoubtedly, security conditions in Tunisia have deteriorated enormously. After two major terrorist attacks last year at the Bardo National Museum and Sousse, a suicide bombing in November killed twelve members of the Presidential Guard in the heart of Tunis.

After the attack, Essebsi immediately re-instated a state of emergency previously in place for several months after the Sousse attack, and put the capital under curfew. Meanwhile, in parts of neighbouring Libya, the Islamic State militant group, which has claimed responsibility for all three attacks, continues to tighten its grip.

Beyond terrorist attacks, Tunisia has seen a significant rise in the crime rate since the 2011 revolution.

But for Sub-Saharans specifically, notable changes in police practices coupled with a climate of increased impunity in the context of the state at large has shaken the community’s confidence in the legal system.

“Under the former regime, under Ben Ali, we were well protected,’” said Rachid Ahmed Souleyman, an architecture student and the vice-president of AESAT. “There was a climate of trust and comfort living in Tunisia that is no longer there.”

Tlili, the member of Nidaa Tounes, said difficulties confronting Sub-Saharans cannot be separated from the broader challenges of Tunisia’s democratic transition, including rebuilding state institutions, serious economic problems and political instability.

“Insecurity is a general problem that affects everyone. The government and the authorities have an obligation to resolve these problems, and we’re working relentlessly to do so,” Tlili said.

Legal gaps

For activists, it’s crucial that the country address fundamental gaps in its legal system.

Racism is still not criminalised in Tunisia. Though discrimination in general is illegal, perpetrators of ethnically motivated attacks, for example, cannot be charged with “racism” or “hate crimes”.

This absence of legal protection against racism is not unique to Tunisia, but remains an issue across much of the region. However, given Tunisia’s widely praised new constitution, activists say it is worth noting the ways in which legislation has not changed since the revolution.

“These attacks happen all over the world. The problem here is the government’s non-recognition, the official denial,” said Toure, the programme officer at Maison du Droit et des Migrations. “In other countries, politicians and officials speak out. Why does this never happen in Tunisia?”

The lack of government discourse focused on racism generally and the problems of the Sub-Saharan community more specifically reflects the newness of Tunisia’s political transition, Tlili said.

“Tunisian political discourse is not very mature. We don’t have specialised politicians, and discourse is very general, more rhetorical battles than substantive debate,” he said. “Little by little, the political discourse will mature, and you will see discourse focused on the issues of specific communities.”

But even beyond the penal code, Sub-Saharans expressed frustration regarding the rules governing the carte de séjour, or residency permit. Upon arriving in Tunisia on a temporary visa, students and interns have a set amount of time to gather all paperwork necessary for the year-long carte de séjour.

Failure to submit required documents results in fines, which continue to accumulate as long as paperwork is not submitted and outstanding fines remain unpaid. According to students, it’s extremely difficult to avoid penalties and ending up, at least temporarily, in an irregular situation.

“There is a lack of coherence among the police,” said Rachid Ahmed Souleyman, AESAT vice-president.

“This week, I applied for my residency permit at a police station in Moncef Bay. I paid 75 dinars ($37), the amount required by law. However, multiple students told me they were required to pay as much as 300 dinars at other police stations. The problem is that different police apply the law differently. Consistent enforcement is a real problem.”

Toure went further: “For many people in an irregular situation in Tunisia, it’s more expensive to pay the accumulated fines than to the pay the smuggler. They’re potential candidates for the trip across the Mediterranean.”

‘A beautiful country’

Although their numbers have decreased since the collapse of the Ben Ali government, thousands of Sub-Saharans have continued to come to Tunisia, often for university studies. While reports of racism are widespread, many students said they still feel positively towards the country.

“Tunisia is a beautiful country and I don’t regret making the choice,” said Mariam, a communications student from Mali.

While the process of getting a residency permit presents “a serious problem,” she explained that she “does (her) best to take advantage of being in Tunisia as much as possible”.

Arthur, an economics student from Congo-Brazzaville, agreed: “I have a lot of Tunisian friends who invite me to their parties and to their weddings. There is racism here, but I wouldn’t say that Tunisia is a particularly racist country.”

Though many Sub-Saharans expressed a desire to leave, others have begun to see Tunisia as a second home. “At the beginning, it was a bit difficult,” Souleyman, AESAT’s vice president, said. “But now, even when other students go home for vacation, I stay in Tunisia. I love living here.”

- See more at: http://www.middleeasteye.net/news/tunisia-grapples-racism-violence-against-sub-saharans-705580668#sthash.qrLmhnxz.dpuf
How Tunisia Became a Top Source of ISIS Recruits
Thousands of Tunisians have gone to fight with Islamic State in Syria, Iraq

 By YAROSLAV TROFIMOV
Feb. 25, 2016 5:30 a.m. ET

TUNIS, Tunisia—The cradle of the Arab Spring, Tunisia remains the freest Arab democracy. It has one of the region’s most developed economies and highest literacy rates. And it is also by far the largest source of foreign fighters heading to join Islamic State in Syria and Iraq.

Between 6,000 and 7,000 Tunisians have left the small North African country to fight for the self-proclaimed caliphate—several times more than from much-more populous Algeria or Egypt. As many as 15,000 others have been barred from international travel because Tunisia’s government suspects them of planning to follow suit.

The Tunisian exodus is remarkable because it defies conventional wisdom that has long sought to explain terrorism by evoking “root causes” such as political repression by dictatorial regimes, or the frustrations of poverty.

The working-class Hay Ettadhamen suburb of Tunis, a spread of drab concrete buildings that wouldn’t be out of place in parts of Spain or Eastern Europe, is one of the hot spots for such departures to Syria and Iraq.

Ahmed Amine Jebri, a 27-year-old architecture student, counted some 20 neighbors who had joined Islamic State: a childhood friend with whom he used to play the “Counter-Strike” videogame, a classmate, an older man who sold dried fruit and cigarettes in a corner store. Several of them are now dead.

“So many people have left from here, and quite a few of them were rather well-off,” Mr. Jebri said. “Some in the neighborhood believe these guys are fools who had gone to Syria to get killed. But many others say they are now in paradise with the virgins.”

Increasingly, Tunisians also form the backbone of Islamic State’s growing presence in neighboring Libya. A U.S. airstrike last week on an Islamic State training camp west of Tripoli killed as many as 50 people, most of them Tunisian fighters.

So what explains this paradox? In a country that remains deeply divided, the answer, predictably, depends on whom you ask.

Tunisia’s functioning democracy remains an exception: Arab Spring revolutions elsewhere have either turned into civil wars, as in Syria, Libya or Yemen, or were crushed by re-established dictatorships, as in Egypt.

Yet even in Tunisia, popular disappointment is spreading, said Moncef Marzouki, a human-rights activist who served as democratic Tunisia’s first president from 2011 and until the end of 2014. While the country’s Jasmine Revolution ushered in democracy, it failed to spur economic growth or curb rampant corruption, he said.

“Why do we have educated people, people with jobs, who go to ISIS?” wondered Mr. Marzouki. “It’s not the matter of tackling socioeconomic roots. You have to go deeper and understand that these guys have a dream—and we don’t. We had a dream—our dream was called the Arab Spring. And our dream is now turning into a nightmare. But the young people need a dream, and the only dream available to them now is the caliphate.”

Mr. Marzouki’s successor as president, 89-year-old Beji Caid Essebsi, served as foreign minister and parliament speaker in prerevolutionary administrations. Many other former officials returned to power after the 2014 elections. To some, especially in disadvantaged areas, the new Tunisia isn’t that different from the Tunisia of old.

“In Tunisia, a policeman can, just as before, stop a citizen on the street and slap him,” said Rafik Ghaki, an attorney who represents hundreds of Tunisians who returned from battlefields in Syria and Iraq, usually to face immediate detention. “A woman who wears the veil, a young man with a beard—they still feel discriminated” against.

To more-secular Tunisians, such explanations ignore what they see as the ambiguous attitude of postrevolutionary governments toward Islamist extremists. The local branch of the Muslim Brotherhood dominated Tunisia’s administration after the first elections in 2011, and remains a minority partner in the current government.

An amnesty declared soon after the revolution freed imprisoned jihadists and allowed others to return from exile. The government initially tried to entice radical groups to participate in politics. It began to crack down on Islamist radicals after their attempt to storm the U.S. Embassy compound in 2012, followed by a series of assassinations and terrorist attacks.

To critics—including some relatives of jihadists—the government is still far too lenient to those who incite radicalism.

“These people have political cover here. Nobody interferes with them,” said Mohammed Iqbel Ben Rejeb, president of the Rescue Association of Tunisians Trapped Abroad, a group that unites some 250 families of Tunisians who joined extremist groups in Syria, Iraq and elsewhere.

Mr. Ben Rejeb’s brother Hamza—who moves in a wheelchair and has to use both hands to raise a glass of water because of his muscular dystrophy—left for Syria in 2013 along with six friends. Realizing how inhospitable Syria was, the brother managed to return home quickly.

“When a person is hypnotized, he doesn’t even know why he’s going there,” Mr. Ben Rejeb said. “It is like a virus.”

Write to Yaroslav Trofimov at yaroslav.trofimov@wsj.com

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Tunisia’s Labor Union Won the Nobel Peace Prize. But Can It Do Its Job?
By Ian M. Hartshorn
February 26

Tunisian Prime Minister Ali Larayedh, left, meets with Houcine Abassi, secretary general of the Tunisian General Labour Union (UGTT), as part of the dialogue between the country’s ruling Islamists and the opposition in Tunis on Jan. 6, 2014. (Fethi Belaid/AFP/Getty Images)
On Jan. 22, Tunisians in the impoverished interior regions of the country took to the streets, demanding increased economic development. Five years ago, similar protests sparked a revolution centered on economic justice. The Tunisian General Labor Union (UGTT), a working- and middle-class-based labor union, played a leading role in the transition process that followed, winning the 2015 Nobel Peace Prize as part of the group of civil society organizations credited with preserving Tunisia’s democratic transition.

For all these contributions, however, the UGTT is first and foremost a labor union, and the democratic transition has yet to achieve the economic gains of most concern to its constituents. Tunisia’s unemployment rate is over 15 percent, worse than before the revolution, with more than half of college educated youth out of work. In a survey last month, 86 percent of Tunisians said the economy was bad or somewhat bad, the highest since 2011. The emergency measures promised by the Cabinet and appeals for calm from the president and prime minister may have ended protests for a moment, but structural problems persist.

Later this year, the UGTT holds its national congress, likely to coincide with regional and municipal elections throughout the country. With no presidential or parliamentary elections until 2019, national power will remain split between the Islamist Ennahda party and the governing Nidaa Tounes, which is riven by internal divisions. This means that the local elections and the UGTT national congress will be an important moment in determining the politics of economic reforms over the next few years. These elections will reveal the balance between competing forces both within the union and the country: secular and Islamist, coastal and interior, left wing and conservative, with serious ramifications for the unemployed youth who drove the revolution and still await its material benefits.

The UGTT played an outsized role in the transition from authoritarianism to democracy in Tunisia. The idea of unions playing such a role in a transition isn’t a new one, but it cuts against some recent global trends. Unions played a key role in the so-called pacted transitions in places, such as Spain and Portugal, where elites cut deals to usher in liberal democratic rule. Unions have lost some of their power in an era of unruly transitions to — and away from — democracy. Globalization has also restricted some trade unions’ traditional power bases, leaving some to question whether they have any role to play.

The UGTT was a political force in the country before the country even existed, helping lead and organize the independence movement that freed Tunisia from French rule. During the long period of dictatorship under the regime of former president Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali, the union played a dual role: loyal part of the regime apparatus and protector of political life under authoritarian rule. The role was an uneasy one, and the union was pushed by its more activist members to join the nascent uprising from 2010 to 2011.

Like all national institutions, the UGTT faced pressure to reform following the revolution. Its efforts culminated in a national conference held in the city of Tabarka in December 2011. This congress selected a new executive board, including unionists with long histories inside the organization as well as some more militant rank-and-file members. Thirteen new members were elected to the leadership, a record for the organization. Throughout 2012, tensions rose between the governing “Troika” of the CPR, Ennahda and Ettakatol and other political forces in the country. The UGTT took up the mantle of opposition, calling for two national strikes during the transition process. The conflict polarized the rank-and-file and some Ennahda-affiliated trade unionists left the movement. The February 2014 ratification of the new constitution helped heal some if not all of these rifts. The strength of the UGTT, as well as their failure to build a robust Islamist alternative, led many Ennahda trade unionists to rejoin the organization.

These overlapping roles as independence-era champions, revolutionary leaders and vanguard of civil society often leave the union struggling to do its most basic job: provide better lives for its membership.

The members of the union span the working and middle classes and are concentrated in the public sector. Economic malaise following the revolution, exacerbated by several assassinations and terrorist attacks, has led to continued high unemployment, and a call for increased flexibility to hire and fire from business leaders, and for potentially shrinking the public sector from budget-conscious politicians. Yet it remains unclear to what extent the UGTT has a plan to deal with any of these issues.

The UGTT can claim several victories on behalf of workers. It has reduced some aspects of the corrupt labor brokerage system that functioned as a patronage network for the old regime. It has reduced the number of employees on short-term, insecure contracts, which often required employees to sign their own resignation letter upon hiring. Successful negotiations raised the minimum wage in the public sector.

In an interview I conducted in July 2015, UGTT Deputy Secretary General Belgacem Ayari laid out an ambitious agenda for the union. It included revising the labor code to come into compliance with international standards, introducing new clauses for gender parity, making it more difficult for employers to lay off workers, and representing more workers in small and medium-sized industries as well as those in the informal sector.

But these accomplishments pale beside the continuing and growing economic problems facing Tunisian workers. The UGTT struggles with its inability to increase employment or to bring about real change in economic development policies in the country’s struggling interior. The January protests starkly illustrated the mounting frustration with the failure of the UGTT to address this economic stagnation.

These failures have led internal critics of the UGTT to question its political focus. As Adnen Hajji, a longtime UGTT activist from the country’s industrial heartland, said, “The current situation is catastrophic. … The UGTT has changed its direction. … It is switching its role to a political one, which is sad.”

A similar tone is echoed by others across the political spectrum.

In a January interview, Mohammad Lakhdar Laajili, a member of parliament from the Ennahda Party who sits on a committee for regional development, stated, “The challenge is unemployment as well as local and international investment. …We had an article for positive discrimination for the interior regions but have failed to implement it.” When asked if long-standing issues of corruption in job placement in the interior region had abated following the revolution, Laajili said, “Of course not.”

One of the main problems the UGTT faces is that so few of those protesting in the nation’s interior are actually members. As Ayari reported earlier this month, the UGTT’s strength is in the public sector.

The vast majority of impoverished Tunisians are either not working — with unemployment levels at more than 40 percent for young people in the interior — or working in the informal sector. While the informal sector includes black market activities, such as drug smuggling and human trafficking, much of it is more benign. Selling small goods without a government license, smuggling cars or industrial parts across the Algerian border to avoid taxes and tariffs, and agricultural work outside the official structures could all be described as the “informal sector” or “parallel economy.”

In January, Mustapha Baccouche of the business federation UTICA said that “the parallel economy could grow to exceed legal commercial activity. … We need to bring it into the legal economy.” Much of this parallel economy is concentrated in the interior region, along the border with Libya where smuggling is common. But efforts to legalize and formalize these workers has been a challenge for both the union and the business community.

The UGTT therefore faces a stark choice about its future political role. If the union decides to keep its energy and attention focused on its own members, many of whom are middle aged and middle income, the institution will separate itself from the great mass of unemployed youth who helped drive the revolutionary project. On the other hand, the union could recognize these members as the future of Tunisian labor and take a more explicitly class-based role. However, to do so would likely open it to accusations of political partisanship and further alienation from the business community and center-right parties, including Ennahda.

As the union continues to grapple with its role in post-revolutionary Tunisia, the leadership balances its, sometimes conflicting, commitments to the state and its membership. However, if the UGTT fails to connect with disenfranchised youth and unrepresented workers, the recent protests will unlikely be the last.

Ian M. Hartshorn is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Nevada, Reno. You can follow him @imhartshorn.
Tunisia Working With Libya on Sabratha IS Identification, Steps Up Security Following US Raid
By Houda Mzioudet
Tunis, 27 February 2016:

The Tunisian authorities say they are coordinating investigations with their Libyan counterparts into the Tunisians killed in last week’s US air raid on facilities in Sabratha used by the so-called Islamic State (IS). Up to as many as 60 IS members, most of them believed to be Tunisians, were killed in the raids. The bodies of several have been returned to Tunisia and DNA tests are to be carried out in an attempt to identify them.

Tunisian Noureddine Chouchene, allegedly one of the masterminds of the Sousse beach resort attack in June 2015 and a target of the raid, was thought to have killed along with the others although there were subsequent reports that he was still alive. However, a body resembling his has now been found in the rubble of one of the blitzed buildings.

A Tunisian investigative judge in charge of anti-terrorism cases in Tunis has opened an investigation into those killed in the raid.

Since it happened, Tunisia has again increased security across the country as well as on the border with Libya.

Speaking on the its Watania 1 TV station talk show last night, former Tunisian foreign affairs minister and veteran diplomat Ahmed Ouanaies revealed that Libyan intelligence has been collaborating with neighbouring countries in the fight against IS. The decision to strike in Sabratha, he said, was “necessary and fast”.

Following it, there have been warnings that, fearing further air attacks against them in Libya, IS and other militants might move to Tunisia and carry out “retaliatory acts on Tunisia soil”.

The US has warned that the Sabratha attack was not a one-off, and that there will be raids.
Wave of Violent Student Demonstrations Has Erupted Across South Africa
Students at North-West University torched buildings and a science centre
Private security and police fought crowds with tear gas and rubber bullets
School pupils in North West province protest having their breasts 'groped'
Majority of protests demand lower tuition fees, more student housing and erasing remnants of the country's racist past

By IMOGEN CALDERWOOD
MAIL ONLINE
23:39 EST, 25 February 2016

Students have torched campus buildings at a university in South Africa after protests turned violent overnight, as school pupils launched protests against being 'groped' by male teachers.

It comes as violent student protests erupt across the country, the majority of which are calling for lower tuition fees, more student housing and erasing remnants of South Africa's racist past.

Three of the nation's top universities have been forced to close so far, as the violence continues.

Police and private security firms attempted to disperse the crowds of student demonstrators at North-West University last night with tear gas and rubber bullets, as students returned fire with stones.

Shocking footage of last night's protest show flames erupting from the windows of the university's administration buildings, which were also home to a science centre.

'I am as shocked as you are about the senseless violence and destruction of property that took place at our Mafikeng Campus yesterday,' said North-West University's Vice Chancellor, Professor Dan Kgwadi in a statement today.  

'Though the incident was related to the inauguration of the newly appointed Campus Student Representative Council (CSRC), we must realise that this was not an isolated incident.

'At many other universities protests have become violent and have escalated. Therefore the situation also needs to be addressed at national level.'

The violence at the university started after some students disrupted the inauguration of a new student council.

Defying a court order, suspended student leader Benz Mabengwane entered the university and addressed his supporters.

Mabengwane is part of a dissolved student council calling for the removal of Afrikaans as a teaching language, which it says unfairly benefits white students on the historically white Potchefstroom campus.

Mabengwane denied that his supporters were behind the fires.

The Mafikeng campus has now been evacuated and been shut down indefinitely.

South African President Jacob Zuma said: 'No amount of anger should drive students to burn their own university and deny themselves and others education.

'The burning of university buildings at a time when we are prioritising the education of our youth is inexplicable and can never be condoned.'

Elsewhere in the North West province, school students went on a rampage after claiming to have had enough of being sexually harassed and abused by their teachers.

Police had to be called in to control the situation at Jan Masibi Middle School at Disaneng village, west of Mafikeng, as pupils smashed windows and damaged ceilings.

Male students had been accused of touching female pupils' breasts under false pretences, such as when searching for mobile phones.

'Male teachers touch our breast saying they are looking for cellphones, and you can see they are enjoying it,' said a Grade 10 pupil.

Other pupils reported punishments that were completely disproportionate to their alleged misdemeanours.

Some claimed to have been suspended for seven days as a punishment after arriving late to school, while another reported being choked in front of other pupils for addressing a teacher in the Tswana language rather than in English.  

In recent days in South Africa, black and white students have even come to blows over the use of Afrikaans as a teaching language, an echo of the 1976 student uprising in the Soweto township south of Johannesburg against apartheid.

Those bloody protests, forcibly put down by security forces, erupted over a rule that classes be taught in Afrikaans, considered to be the language of the white oppressor.

A protest at the University of Pretoria over the use of Afrikaans led to clashes between black and white students, also forcing the university to shut down.

'The university is currently meeting with various student bodies and stakeholders to address the issues affecting learning,' spokeswoman Anna-Retha Bouwer told AFP.

Meanwhile, excrement was smeared across the floors of many lecture halls at the University of Cape Town (UCT) – one of the country’s top institutions – however the university remained open.

UCT vice chancellor Max Price expressed his 'abhorrence' after students on Wednesday threw faeces around university facilities.

'Not only is flinging poo around a dangerous health hazard; it is also an affront to our shared humanity,' he said in statement.

Last week, Price's office was petrol-bombed, and paintings ripped from walls and burnt outside.

Elsewhere, racial tension flared up at the Free State University in Bloemfontein when a rugby match was interrupted earlier this week. The Free State is the heartland of Afrikaners.

Black protesters walked in a line across the pitch during the game, before hundreds of white spectators ran on and a mass brawl erupted.

Workers at the campus in Bloemfontein, most of them black, have been protesting to demand an end to outsourcing -- when non-teaching services such as cleaning are taken on by private companies.

The university said in a statement that 'the reaction from the group of spectators…not only opened old wounds, it trampled, literally and figuratively, on the dignity and humanity of other human beings.'

Morne Mostert, leader of the cultural group's youth wing, told the South African Broadcasting Corporation that rather than do away with Afrikaans, universities should develop education in black African languages.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3464350/University-buildings-burned-students-protesting-teachers-regularly-groped-pupils-breasts-pretending-search-mobile-phones-South-Africa.html#ixzz41O58XnW2
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
Africa Urged to Increase Investment in Immunization
February 24, 2016
Roselyne Sachiti in ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA
Zimbabwe Herald

African countries, especially those that have attained middle class status have been urged to increase investment in immunisation and start making preparations to finance activities from their own national budgets and move from donor dependence. According to a new report “Fulfilling a promise: Ensuring immunisation for all in Africa” issued here by the World Health Organisation’s Regional Office for Africa and the Eastern Mediterranean region ahead of the first ever Ministerial Conference on Immunisation in Africa, only 15 African countries fund more than 50 percent of their national immunisation programmes.

These include Algeria, Cape Verde, Botswana, South Africa, Namibia, Seychelles, Mauritius and Equatorial Guinea.

Addressing journalists, WHO Regional Director for Africa, Dr Matshidiso Moeti said during the ministerial conference, they would further encourage health ministers to make more efforts to understand the importance of vaccines.

“For Africa to achieve its full potential and secure a bright future, we must unite to ensure that every child on the continent receives vaccines he or she needs to survive and thrive,” she said.

Currently, Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has invested heavily in supporting 70 percent of countries on the continent that is 38 out of 54 countries.

More than 240 million African children have been immunised through Gavi support since 2000.

Zimbabwe is one of the countries that receives funding from Gavi. Between the year 2000 and November 2015, Gavi disbursed $74 270 696 for measles (NVS), rubella and rota virus immunisation among others. African Union Commissioner for Social Affairs Dr Mustapha Sidiki Kaloko said a lot of work needs to be done to adress gaps.

This, he said, requires the highest political support at country and continental level.

Ethiopia Minister of Health Dr Kesetebirhan Admasu said Africa could do more. “We must do more to protect all our children from devastating illnesses – not only because it is our responsibility to ensure healthier futures for our citizens, but also because it is a smart economic decision,” said Dr Admasu.

African Union Commission Chairperson Dr Nkosazana Dlamini-Zuma said, “This is the start of a new era of health on our continent in which all countries commit to saving and improving children’s lives using one of the most powerful tools ever invented: vaccines.

“Africa’s unity on immunisation is our best hope for a better future,” said Dr Dlamini-Zuma.
Zimbabwe Tobacco Output to Decline
February 26, 2016
Zimbabwe Herald

ZIMBABWE’S tobacco output may decline by at least 10 percent this year, due to the late start of the cropping season and the effects of El-Nino induced drought, Tobacco Industry and Marketing Board chief executive Mr Andrew Matibiri said yesterday.

Last year, the country produced nearly 200 million kilogrammes, down from 216 million kg produced a year earlier, the record tobacco output in just over a decade.

“We will obviously be down by at least 10 percent this year,” said Mr Matibiri without providing the actual figures. “As you know the season has not been so good for us.”

Early this year, Dr Matibiri said the El-Nino effect came with prolonged dry and very hot weather during the transplanting phase of the crop and this decimated crops that could not be irrigated.

Farmer organisations, however, believe the crop size could range between 160 and 180 million kg.

“The reduction in the crop is mainly due to the poor season,” Zimbabwe National Farmers Union vice president Mr Garikayi Msika said in an interview.

“The issue of drought became known as far back as July last year, so many dry land farmers reduced their planned hectarage. Tobacco contractors were also very cautious.”

Zimbabwe earned $855 million from tobacco exports in 2015, about 11 percent higher than the previous year on higher prices and demand from China, according to the TIMB.

This makes tobacco the country’s single largest export commodity, ahead of gold and platinum.

While tobacco output will decline, the quality could be better, particularly the irrigated crop, Zimbabwe Research Board director Dr Delia Garwe said in an interview yesterday. Out of 91 160ha planted last season, about 15 000ha were put under irrigation.

“We are expecting a very good quality crop especially the irrigated crop,” said Dr Garwe.

The TIMB has not yet announced the opening date for this year’s selling season.

The Southern African region is bracing for a humanitarian crisis due to the worst ever drought induced by the El-Nino weather phenomenon, last recorded in almost two decades.

In recognition of the potential impact of the El-Nino induced drought on tobacco output, the Government reduced tobacco levy from 1,5 percent to 0,75 percent,” Finance and Economic Development Minister Patrick Chinamasa said in the 2016 National Budget.
Zimbabwe: President Welcomes New Envoys
By Felex Share
Zimbabwe Herald

Incoming United States ambassador to Zimbabwe Mr Harry Thomas Jnr yesterday struggled to explain why his country has maintained an illegal sanctions regime on Zimbabwe, mumbling inaudibly each time he tried to justify the embargo.

Mr Thomas, an African American diplomat who once served at the US Embassy in Harare, dithered when journalists took him to task over the illegal sanctions immediately after presenting his credentials to President Mugabe yesterday.

After being tongue-tied for some time, the envoy resorted to the usual mantra of alleged unfair elections and violation of human rights peddled by the Western media.

"Our sanctions are in place because aaah aaah, certain . . . how shall we say? . . . the . . .

He continued: "There are sanctions against individuals and corporations and we discussed this with President Mugabe as our senators did last week when he met them. We were not certain about elections that were held before but what we are talking now is politics and governance. We have to look at economic management as well as governance that includes human rights. Am I right or wrong?"

Three other ambassadors from Bulgaria, Georgia and Austria also presented their credentials to President Mugabe.

Relations between Harare and Washington turned sour at the turn of the millennium after the US government imposed sanctions on Zimbabwe in retaliation for a bilateral tiff between Zimbabwe and Britain over the land reform programme.

The US came up with a law, the Zimbabwe Transition to Democracy and Economic Recovery Act (ZIDERA) to back the illegal sanctions outside the purview of the UN system.

Mr Thomas, who takes over from Mr Bruce Wharton, said relations between the US and Zimbabwe were "people to people" with the former providing developmental assistance and humanitarian aid.

He said his country would continue working with Zimbabwe in combating human trafficking, HIV and Aids-related issues and education.

"I told him (President Mugabe) that we will continue to help the people of Zimbabwe to combat the effects of El Nino and drought," said Mr Thomas .

"We provide millions of dollars to Zimbabwe to go and study in the United States. We will continue to be the largest donor. I told the President that we are so excited the US government is constructing a new embassy. It will bring more than 800 jobs and $30 million into Harare. It's the largest construction project in years."

New Bulgaria Ambassador to Zimbabwe Ms Katya Deleva said there was need to restore the vibrant relations that existed between the two countries in the 1980s.

"Between our countries, we had very dynamic and good relations in the 80s but after that because of the changes (in the Bulgarian system), the relations just went down a little bit," she said.

"I am sure there are a lot of possibilities to strengthen the relations, to have exchanges between our business people. There are Bulgarian companies who have shown interest in areas like agriculture. I hope that they will do business together with Zimbabwean companies."

Mr Beka Dvali, who is the first Georgian ambassador to Zimbabwe, said his country needed co-operation with Zimbabwe in all spheres.

He said: "I am so much happy and thrilled to be the first Georgian ambassador to Zimbabwe. It was a long-waited kind of establishment of interaction between our nations. We are very much looking forward to establishing diverse relations between our two nations.
‘War Crimes’ in Neo-Colonial Libya Condemned
AGENCE FRANCE PRESSE
Published — Friday 26 February 2016

GENEVA: All sides in Libya’s chaotic conflict are likely guilty of war crimes, including torturing, raping and executing prisoners, the UN said Thursday, urging the world to do more to bring the perpetrators to justice.

“A multitude of actors, both state and non-state, are accused of very serious violations and abuses that may, in many cases, amount to war crimes,” UN human rights chief Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein said in a statement.

A report released Thursday documenting abuses committed in Libya between 2014 and 2015 warned the situation had deteriorated dramatically during that period.

Libya has had rival administrations since the summer of 2014 when the recognized government fled Tripoli after the Fajr Libya militia alliance including militants overran the capital.

A power vacuum since the 2011 toppling of former leader Muammar Qaddafi has fostered the rise of Daesh in the country, which is currently headquartered in the former dictator’s hometown of Sirte, but control of Benghazi remains divided between a collection of militias.

Thursday’s report details how most major armed groups in the country “have carried out unlawful killings,” mainly executing people they had taken captive and assassinating those seen voicing dissent.

The six-member investigation team behind the report was only able to visit Libya briefly during their year-long probe due to the dire security situation in Libya but conducted interviews with more than 200 victims and witnesses.

They described how bodies of people detained by different armed groups and the Libyan National Army, were found bearing clear evidence of torture and execution.

The report also details widespread and horrific torture by different factions, including beatings with plastic pipes and electrical cables, prolonged suspension in stress positions, electrocution and lack of food. According to the report, a number of detainees had been tortured to death.

The report, which was ordered by the UN Human Rights Council, said thousands of people were currently in detention, most without any proper examination of their cases, and many in secret detention centers.

Sexual violence, while difficult to document, appears to be rife in places of detention, the investigators said.

They detailed one case where a woman said she had been abducted in Tripoli by members of an unidentified armed group, before being drugged and repeatedly raped over six months. After her escape, she discovered she was pregnant.

The woman said she had seen six girls as young as 11 who were sexually abused by members of the same group.

The investigators also decried the forcible recruitment of children by armed groups, including those linked to Daesh, who celebrated the practice.

The report cited two boys, aged 10 and 14, who said they had been forced from their families to take part in Daesh weapons training, using live ammunition, and watch videos of beheadings.

“One of the most striking elements of this report lies in the complete impunity which continues to prevail in Libya and the systematic failures of the justice system,” Zeid said.

Thursday’s report called on the Security Council to list the “individuals responsible for violations or abuses” and slap them with sanctions.

They also complained that the International Criminal Court tasked with investigating the abuses did not have the resources to do so properly.
War-torn Libya's Competing Zones of Influence
After year and half of conflict, Libya is now territorially divided between two rival regimes, competing militias and the terrorist Daesh group

By Seifeddin al-Trabulsi and Moataz al-Mejbari
Anadolu News Agency
TRIPOLI, Libya

 The military struggle between Libya’s rival political camps began in earnest a year and a half ago and has since created new territorial divisions -- and areas of competing military influence -- across the North African country.

Libya has remained in a state of turmoil since a bloody rebellion in early 2011 -- part of the "Arab Spring" uprisings -- ended with the ouster and death of longtime Pan-Africanist Muammar Gaddafi.

Since then, the country’s stark political divisions have yielded two rival seats of government, one in Tobruk and one in capital Tripoli, each of which boasts its own institutions and military capacities.

The first political camp is the Tripoli-based General National Congress (GNC) and its affiliated government, led by Prime Minister Khalifa al-Ghweil.

The GNC is a legislative authority, members of which were elected in July of 2012 for two-year terms. In mid-2014, the GNC unilaterally extended its mandate and refused to transfer legislative authority to a newly-elected Council of Representatives.

The 200-member Council of Representatives, for its part, is now based in the eastern city of Tobruk under an "interim" government led by Abdullah al-Thani.

According to some observers, the Council of Representatives lacks legitimacy following a 2014 ruling by Libya’s Tripoli-based Supreme Constitutional Court.

On Nov. 6 of that year, the court ruled that an article in Libya’s constitution was unconstitutional, which essentially meant that the Council of Representatives itself lacked constitutionality.

The council, however, contested this claim, challenging the legitimacy of the court, which it said, was a tool of the Tripoli-based GNC.

As it currently stands, the political polarization in Libya has served to divide the country into different areas of administrative and military control, which are loosely as follows:

1. Areas of administrative control

The GNC currently controls most of western Libya, from the Tunisian border up to -- but not including -- the coastal city of Sirte. Areas under GNC control include capital Tripoli but exclude the city of Zintan and the Warshefana area.

The Tobruk-based government, meanwhile, now controls most of eastern Libya, including Benghazi, the country’s second largest city.

The Daesh terrorist group, for its part, has taken advantage of this ongoing rivalry to capture territory of its own.

Although the terrorist group lost the city of Derna to the Shura Council of Mujahideen -- an Islamist group loyal to neither Tobruk nor Tripoli -- late last year, it currently holds the city of Sirte, the hometown of late leader Gaddafi.

Estimates as to the number of Daesh terrorists currently based in Sirte range from 1,500 (Libyan sources) to 3,000 (sources cited by the western media).

2. Areas of military control

Western Libya is currently witnessing military conflict between the pro-GNC Fajr Libya ("Libyan Dawn") forces on the one hand and the self-styled "Army Operations Command" and the allied Al-Zintan Brigades -- both of which support the Tobruk government -- on the other.

Fajr Libya consists of revolutionaries who fought the Gaddafi regime in 2011. The group currently holds all the territory along the Libyan coast from the outskirts of Sirte to the border of Tunisia.

In eastern Libya, meanwhile, the army loyal to the Tobruk government is fighting Daesh and the "Shura Council of Benghazi Revolutionaries", who fought the Gaddafi regime in Benghazi in 2011.

The military conflict has remained ongoing since May 16, 2014, when -- in a move described as a "coup" by his opponents -- General Khalifa Haftar appeared on Libyan television to announce the dissolution of the Tripoli parliament, which had just unilaterally extended its mandate.

Haftar, with the support of the new government in Tobruk, went on to launch a wide-ranging military operation against the Ansar al-Sharia and Revolutionaries Brigades, both of which had fought the Gaddafi regime during the rebellion.

Haftar (who once served Gadadffi before defecting in the late 1980s) was later promoted to the rank of commander-in-chief of the Tobruk government’s armed forces.

The Daesh terrorist group, meanwhile, has continued to carry out sporadic raids in oil-rich areas of eastern Libya.

And in the country’s south, most territory is held by various tribes who have remained largely neutral in the ongoing conflict between Tobruk and Tripoli.
Al-Jaafari: Syrian Government Ready to Help Apply Cessation of Fighting Actions
27 February، 2016

New York, SANA-Syria’s permanent envoy to the UN Bashar al-Jaafari said on Friday that the Syrian government has spared no effort, since the beginning of the crisis, to find a political settlement to the crisis in the country.

“The Syrian government, in continuation of that approach and in light of its keenness on halting the bloodshed of the Syrians and restoring security and stability to the country, has officially announced its acceptance to the cessation of fighting actions on the basis of continuing the military efforts to combat terrorism against the Islamic State (ISIS) and Jabhat al-Nusra and other terrorist organizations affiliated to them or to al-Qaeda in accordance with the Russian-US joint declaration,” al-Jaafari said in a statement following the UN Security Council’s adoption of Resolution No. 2268 on the cessation of the fighting actions in Syria.

He added that the Syrian government considers the content of this declaration as an important step towards the political settlement and stresses readiness to contribute to applying the cessation of the fighting actions.

Al-Jaafari noted that the delegation of the Syrian Arab Republic has taken part in the latest Geneva talks with good intention and full seriousness in order to reach a political settlement to the crisis in Syria.

“The Syrian government is ready to actively participate in any sincere effort that aims at reaching this political settlement through which only the Syrian people determine the future of their country via a Syrian-led dialogue among the Syrians themselves and without any foreign intervention in a way that guarantees Syria’s sovereignty, independence and territorial integrity,” al-Jaafari said, affirming that these points are included in the second preliminary paragraph of the Resolution 2268 adopted by the Security Council.

He added that the Syrians are invited to work on consolidating the national reconciliations and mobilizing efforts to eliminate terrorism and start the reconstruction process as well as to build Syria and preserve its sovereignty and its independent decision.

Responding to allegations of US envoy to the Security Council that there is no existence for “Jabhat al-Nusra” in Daraya town in Damascus countryside, al-Jaafari said that this is categorically wrong as Jabhat al-Nusra is present in Daraya, pointing out to a new list that includes names of hundreds of terrorists who were killed in Syria in 2015, most of them belong to Jabhat al-Nusra and ISIS and some of them were killed in Daraya.

R.Milhim/Mazen


Security Council adopts resolution No. 2268 on cessation of combat activities in Syria

26 February، 2016

New York, SANA – The UN Security Council on Friday unanimously adopted resolution No. 2268 on cessation of combat activities in Syria.

The council reiterated commitment to Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, voicing support to settle the crisis in Syria through the UN, based on Geneva Statement and Vienna declarations.

Members of the Council called on UN Secretary General and his Special Envoy for Syria to resume the Syrian-Syrian dialogue as soon as possible.

Prior to the voting, UN Special Envoy for Syria Staffan de Mistura underlined that there is no substitute to the political solution to the crisis in Syria.

Concerning the Syrian-Syrian talks, de Mistura announced his intention to resume the talks on March 7th provided that “halting the fighting acts and continuing the process if delivering the humanitarian aid to the people in need.”

Russia and the United States had distributed the draft resolution earlier, in which ISIS, Jabhat al-Nusra, and other terrorist organizations were excluded from the cessation of combat activities.

In a statement after the Council adopted the resolution, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Gennady Gatilov stressed the need to stop the support provided for terrorist organizations by foreign sides because that hinders the political solution for the crisis in Syria.

Hazem Sabbagh/Mazen
Ten Civilians Killed, Scores Injured in Several Terrorist Attacks in Hama, Deir Ezzor, Aleppo
27 February، 2016

Aleppo, SANA- One person was killed another was injured in terrorists’ attacks at al-Sheikh Maqssoud, and Suleiman Halabi neighborhoods in Aleppo city Saturday, a source at Aleppo Police Command told SANA.

The source added that one person was killed and another was injured by terrorists’ sniper fires at the outskirts of al-Sheikh Maqssoud neighborhood.

Terrorists, positioned in Bustan Basha neighborhood, also fired a rocket shell at citizens houses in Suleiman Halabi neighborhood injuring a woman who was hospitalized, the source added.

Deir Ezzor

Three children were killed and 12 other people were injured Saturday in ten ISIS terrorists’ mortar and rocket shells against al-Joura and al-Qosour neighborhoods in Deir Ezzor, a source at the governorate told SANA.

The attacks fired from al-Haweiqa neighborhood,  also, caused material damage to citizens’ properties, the source added.

Hama

Six civilians were killed on Saturday and several others were injured in three terrorist explosions in Salamyieh area in the eastern countryside of Hama.

A Source at Hama Governorate told SANA that a suicide bomber blew himself up with a car bomb on Saturday at about 06:00 a.m., 1 km away from the eastern entrance of Salamyieh City in Hama countryside.

The source added that two civilians were killed and 4 others sustained serious injuries.

The terrorist attack also caused a material damage to the place and the hole at the site of the explosion proves that the car was a lorry and it was carrying about a ton of the explosive materials.

Later, the source said that a suicide bomber blew himself up with a motorcycle bomb at the entrance of al-Tayba village in the eastern countryside of Salamyieh, killing 4 civilians and injuring others.

The source added that a civilian was injured too in a terrorist bombing with an explosive device on the road of Salamyieh-Khneifes.
America’s Twenty-Five-Year Fiasco in Iraq
 Perry Cammack
National Interest

Twenty-five years ago this week, on February 24, 1991, the first United States ground invasion of Iraq began. The first Bush administration had clear UN and congressional mandates to liberate Kuwait. More than thirty countries contributed ground forces, and the Soviet Union was a critical diplomatic partner. After a punishing six-week air campaign, the ground battle seemed to be over almost as soon as it had started, displaying the American military’s tremendous tactical and technological superiority. But amid talk of a new world order, the hundred-hour ground invasion was only the opening chapter in America’s tragic twenty-five-year Iraq story.

Leaving Saddam in power was the correct decision, but it created a dilemma: what to do with an implacably hostile tyrant. As with Germany after World War I, Saddam had every incentive to challenge the postwar settlement. The economic embargo imposed to compel Iraq’s withdrawal from Kuwait remained after that withdrawal was complete. Because no real attempt was made to find a more durable postwar settlement—that would have constrained the Iraqi military and deterred chemical, biological and nuclear research, while mitigating the catastrophic impacts of a long-term full embargo—the diplomatic effort to sustain the sanctions regime was bound to increase with time.

Thus, tactical postwar adaptations gradually calcified into contradictory policy objectives of containment and regime change. Saddam’s willingness to sacrifice his people’s welfare gave him a powerful diplomatic weapon in resisting sanctions and weapons inspections. By the time the George W. Bush administration took office in 2001, the sanctions regime was unraveling amid growing outrage at the profound suffering of the Iraqi citizenry.

Then came 9/11.

It is now understood that Osama bin Laden’s masterstroke was blowback against the American military deployment in the Arabian Peninsula. But the second Bush administration’s response was a foreign policy blunder matched in modern American history only by the Vietnam War.

Saddam was removed from power in fewer than four weeks, but the incompetence of the occupation that followed defied comprehension. The simultaneous dismantling of the Iraqi army and the Baath Party exacerbated the devastation of decades of war and economic isolation, unleashing primordial forces that Washington struggled to comprehend, and that 150,000 American troops could not control.

Terrorist organizations had long operated in the shadows of the Middle East. But only since the second invasion of Iraq have they been able to recruit thousands of foreign fighters to the heart of the region, control vast territory and engage in nihilistic destruction on such a grand scale.

According to the Chicago Project on Security and Terrorism, an astounding 42 percent of the roughly 4,800 global suicide attacks since 1982 have occurred in Iraq, all of them since 2003. Before 2003, global suicide attacks averaged seventeen a year. Since then, they have increased by two thousand percent to an average of 370 per year.

Like Nixon’s Vietnam inheritance, President Obama faced an untenable commitment for marginal strategic benefit as he entered office in January 2009. Nearly four thousand American soldiers had died and credible estimates of the war’s full costs ran as high as $3 trillion, while Iraqi leaders were no closer to resolving fundamental political divisions.

Two months before leaving office, the second Bush administration signed a bilateral security agreement requiring American combat forces be withdrawn from Iraq by the end of 2011. Many believed the agreement would be extended, but President Obama was determined to fulfill his campaign commitment to complete the withdrawal. In December 2011, the withdrawal was completed and America’s war in Iraq—the second in two decades—was declared over. But this modicum of stability, too, proved illusory.

The American military occupation was deeply unpopular among Iraqis, and the parliament was never going to provide legal immunities necessary to allow a large-scale American troop presence to continue. But despite tepid negotiations for a follow-on military presence, Obama gave the distinct impression he was content to take no for an answer. A more determined approach might have yielded a creative political mechanism for a limited, noncombat, follow-on American troop presence.

Might the collapse of the Iraqi army against the self-proclaimed Islamic State (IS) in 2014 have been delayed or prevented? Certainly, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki’s unique incompetence belied the decades-long devastation of Iraq’s political culture. The reconstituted military and police retained certain dysfunctions that limited the effectiveness of their Saddam-era predecessors. On the other hand, Maliki’s most egregious blunder was the purging of Iraq’s senior officer corps, replacing them with corrupt cronies. An American noncombat military presence might have discouraged some of these worst sectarian impulses, improved accountability and ameliorated the sharp decline in morale.

Instead, Iraq began again to fall apart, slowly at first, then more quickly as armed revolution began to shake Syria. Eventually this disintegration forced Maliki’s ouster, but not before the Iraqi army collapsed like a house of cards in Mosul in June 2014, against a vastly outnumbered IS force. By August, the American bombing of Iraq had commenced again.

At it its core, the American experience in Iraq has been a failed twenty-five-year effort to address Iraq’s internal political dysfunction. The George H.W. Bush and Clinton administrations attempted this through an awkward balance of coercion, containment and, at least rhetorically, regime change. The second Bush administration undertook a disastrous imperial nation-building effort. The Obama administration was committed to disengagement until the declaration of a terrorist caliphate pulled it back in.

With a new administration taking office in less than a year, three important lessons can be drawn from this most unhappy experience. First, the United States needs to dispense with ideological approaches. The hubristic excesses of the second Bush administration in attempting to recreate the Middle East are well documented. But the Obama administration was itself slow to adapt to changing circumstances. As a result, U.S. policy toward Iraq since 2003 has resembled an ideological pivot on the narrow question of the efficacy of military force. While the military’s overuse has repeatedly been demonstrated incapable of resolving underlying political problems in the Middle East, both neoconservative and neo-isolationist approaches have proven profoundly lacking. Meanwhile, an assortment of economic, political and diplomatic instruments is too often treated as an afterthought.

Second, policy success is difficult to find where policy objectives are ill defined. Regrettably, the United States has lacked clear objectives in Iraq since Saddam’s eviction from Kuwait twenty-five years ago. As the borders between Syria and Iraq have been erased, the central locus for U.S. policy has shifted to Syria. In contrast with Putin’s ruthless focus on Assad’s preservation—which goes a long way toward explaining Russia’s relative success—American policies in Syria are every bit as contradictory today as in Iraq a decade ago. The next administration will have to clearly decide whether its overriding priority is the defeat of the Islamic State, the removal of Bashar al-Assad or ending the humanitarian catastrophe, since each requires a somewhat different approach.

Third, and perhaps most importantly, the global policy community desperately needs tools to address the profound institutional deficiencies of the broader Arab world. The U.S. military has solutions that are often quite effective in addressing security threats and challenges. Unlike in 1991, however, the fundamental challenges in the Middle East today are primarily political in nature. The Islamic State’s terrifying emergence is rooted in decades of catastrophic governance failures in Syria and Iraq, which cannot be bombed away. Yet, after twenty-five years of near-continuous U.S. military engagement, Washington is no more competent today in supporting better governance, suggesting that the United States is likely to remain marginal to such efforts going forward.

Addressing these institutional failings is central to the emergence of a more stable Middle East. An important starting point for the next administration is recognition of the magnitude of the challenge, understanding the relatively marginal role Washington will play, and appreciation for the profound tension between America’s short-term security needs and the region’s long-term reform needs.

The U.S. invasion of Iraq in February 1991 marked the high water mark of American post–Cold War power. The Berlin Wall had fallen; the Soviet Union was existential nemesis turned partner; the demons of Vietnam vanquished. Yet for twenty-five years, four successive administrations have bequeathed grim inheritances to their successors involving this faraway desert land, hitherto marginal to American foreign policy.

Eleven months from now, a fifth American administration will begin its own chapter with a happy ending nowhere in sight.

Perry Cammack is an associate in the Middle East Program at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Suicide Bombings in Afghanistan Kill at Least 26
By MUJIB MASHAL and JAWAD SUKHANYAR
New York Times
FEB. 27, 2016

Afghan mourners carried the coffin of the victim of a suicide attack in Kunar Province on Saturday.

KABUL, Afghanistan — Two separate suicide bombings in Afghanistan on Saturday left at least 26 people dead and nearly 50 wounded, officials said, days ahead of expected talks between the government and the Taliban.

The first attack, in Asadabad near the governor’s compound in the eastern province of Kunar, killed at least 14 people and wounded 41 others, said Wahidullah Kalimzai, the province’s governor.

Hours later, a suicide bomber in Kabul set off his explosives at the entrance of the Defense Ministry’s headquarters as soldiers and officials were leaving their offices, killing at least 12 people and wounding eight, a statement from the ministry said.

The Taliban were responsible for the Kabul attack, said a spokesman for the insurgents, Zabihullah Mujahid. No one claimed responsibility yet for the blast in Kunar.

Violence has not abated across Afghanistan this winter, unlike in previous years, and it is expected to intensify in the spring, customarily the start of the insurgent fighting season.

The government of President Ashraf Ghani has been trying to engage the Taliban in negotiations, in the hope of reaching a political resolution to the long war. Officials from Afghanistan, the United States, China and Pakistan, where the insurgency’s leadership is based, recently invited the Taliban to face-to-face talks in Islamabad, the Pakistani capital, in early March.

But the Taliban have yet to publicly declare whether they will attend, and Afghan officials have been playing down expectations that the talks would lead to a quick reduction in violence even if the insurgents participate.

The target of the attack in Asadabad, the provincial capital of Kunar Province, appeared to have been a tribal elder named Hajji Khan Jan, who had orchestrated a local uprising against the Taliban in his home district, Dangam. Mr. Jan was among the dead, Mr. Kalimzai, the governor, said.

The attack occurred on the main road in Asadabad, in a crowded area that includes a park frequented by children. The bomber, believed to have been riding a motorcycle, detonated his explosives in front of a soup vendor’s stall. Most of those who died were civilians, including three brothers from one family. The city’s hospital was overwhelmed by the number of wounded people and issued a public appeal for blood donations.

“I went to the bookstore to buy books for myself,” said Ahmad Zaher, 25, who was wounded in the blast. “When I looked out, I heard a bang and saw a flame of fire out on the street, then I woke up and saw I am in a hospital bed.”

The Kabul bomber also picked a crowded market area, near the entrance of the Defense Ministry. The bomber was on foot, said Abdul Basir Mujahid, a spokesman for the Kabul police. He said that employees of the ministry might be among the dead.

As has become a routine in Kabul, where such attacks are frequent, firefighters washed away the gory remains on the street soon after the area was cordoned off by the security forces.

Niamatullah Karyab reported from Asadabad, Afghanistan.