Benton Harbor mass demonstration, July 12, 2003. This march took place several weeks after the rebellion that was sparked by police brutality resulting in the death of an African-American youth. (Photo: Abayomi Azikiwe, PANW)
Originally uploaded by Pan-African News Wire File Photos.
Sundays, 10a.m. – 11a.m.
Airdate: Sunday, May 13, 2007
Activist Guest, Rev. Edward Pinkney will speak to our audience the day before his sentencing.
JOIN “FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE” IN SUPPORTING REV. PINKNEY
*See below for Rev. Pinkney Background Info
If you would like to ride to Benton Harbor on Monday, May 14th and support Rev. Pinkney, please call The Detroit Coalition Against Police Brutality at 313.963.8116 to reserve your seat on the bus.
-JUST BEING A MOTHER:
JOY, SORROW AND THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE
Mothers who have lost children as a result of police brutality will share their thoughts this Sunday, the day celebrated as Mother's Day.
-Views and Opinions from Michigan's Most Informed Listening Audience.
-& MORE! DON’T MISS IT!!!!!
Rev. Pinkney’s supporters mobilize for sentencing
By Cheryl LaBash
Published Apr 12, 2007 10:05 PM
The Rev. Edward Pinkney won’t be alone in Benton Harbor, Mich., when he faces the racist power structure that is trying to silence him and his organization, BANCO (Black Autonomy Network of Community Organizations). On March 21, the Rev. Edward Pinkney was convicted by an all-white jury on charges that supporters explain were highly motivated by political struggles taking place in Berrien County, Mich.
Detroit supporters are already organizing bus transportation to fill the
courtroom when he is sentenced on May 14.
Rev. Pinkney was accused of five counts of election improprieties during the successful 2005 recall election of Glen Yarbrough, Benton Harbor city commissioner and supporter of the Harbor Shores Development.
In the first trial, a jury with two African-American participants could not
reach agreement. Charges included merely having another person’s absentee ballot in his possession. Pinkney admitted giving stamps and labels to people who could not afford to buy stamps to send in their absentee ballots.
A well-known community leader, Rev. Pinkney relentlessly exposes the racist court and economic system oppressing the mostly African-American people of Benton Harbor. The details of his trial and the jury selection prove once again what he has said all along about the unjust and racist treatment of the Benton Harbor people, especially the exclusion of Black jurors….
For Additional Information:
MECAWI Films Presents "Haiti: We Must Kill The Bandits"
Location: 5922 Second Ave. in Detroit
MX5: Malcolm. Message. Mobilizing. Method. Music
Location: The Michigan Building, 220 Bagley, 10th Floor in Detroit
Contact: DCAPB, 313.963.8116 or DetCoalition@sbcglobal.net
Event Announcement: EXCLUSIVE INTRODUCTORY SPECIAL $20*
*(with a four spot minimum purchase)
Support OUR SPONSORS
Web Development/Graphic Design
ADVERTISE ON THE RADIO
60 Second Commercial =
30 Second Commercial =
FIGHTING FOR JUSTICE
Monday, May 07, 2007
PINKNEY PASSES POLYGRAPH
STAGE SET FOR SENTENCING AN INNOCENT MAN
The stage is set for the sentencing of Rev. Edward Pinkney on May 14 in St. Joseph, Michigan. Pinkney's attorneys have received the pre-sentence investigation (PSI), which recommends that Pinkney be sentenced to a minimum of 14 and a maximum of 43 months in prison.
Pinkney's attorneys will argue that the sentencing guidelines were incorrectly scored and that the minimum/maximum range should be lower. Even then, Pinkney is almost certain to get some time in jail or prison.
On Monday, May 7, Pinkney's lawyers filed a motion for bond pending appeal and another motion to delay the sentencing because the Legislature is considering changes in the law which would reduce the maximum penalties in Pinkney's case from five years to two years.
Most importantly, Pinkney's attorneys revealed to the judge and to the public for the first time that Pinkney passed a polygraph (lie detector) test on April 13 on all issues. The polygraph was conducted by Christopher J. Lanfear, the polygraph examiner for the Oakland County Sheriff's Department. There is no question of Mr. Lanfear's integrity and impartiality.
Pinkney was asked the following of series of questions:
1. (Q) Did you direct Brenda Fox to illegally influence any voter?
2. (Q) Regarding Brenda Fox, did you recruit her to pay people five dollars to vote?
3. (Q) Did you handle absentee ballots from either of the Williams' sisters (Danielle and LaToya), like they said?
4. (Q) Did you handle an absentee ballot from Rosie Miles, like she said?
After analyzing Pinkney's responses to those questions, which cover every act that he stands convicted of, Lanfear wrote:
It is the opinion of the undersigned examiner, based on the analysis of the polygraph examination of EDWARD JUNIOR PINKNEY, that he is being truthful to the pertinent test questions.
Pinkney's attorneys gave the prosecutor a confidential copy of the report and offered for Pinkney to take another test. The prosecution refused.
Is it because they do not care? Because they already know he is innocent, having framed him in the first place? Because they do not want to have him pass their own test and have it used against them? Whatever the reason, it is clear that the prosecutor, like the all-white jury, is not interested in truth and justice.
Although polygraph tests are not admissible as evidence, the test supports Pinkney's argument for the most lenient possible sentence and for bond pending appeal.
WHAT WILL THE COURTS DO WHEN THEY KNOW THEY HAVE CONVICTED AN INNOCENT MAN?
WHAT WILL WE DO TO MAKE SURE THAT THEY "DO THE RIGHT THING?"
The second significant development is that the Prosecuting Attorneys Association of Michigan has recommended to the Legislature, and the Governor agrees, that the maximum penalty for the felonies against Pinkney should be reduced from five years to two years. Getting the Judge to delay the sentencing would be a significant victory and an indication that he is inclined to be lenient. The legislation is being held up because of the overall budget crisis in Michigan; not much legislation will go forward until some of those problems are solved.
WE MUST PREPARE TO START A LEGISLATIVE CAMPAIGN.
On the question of the jury challenge and the all-white jury, Pinkney has filed a motion for reconsideration of the judge's denial, showing that the information given to his lawyers and expert in order to analyze racial disparities was inadequate, incomplete, and prevented them from doing so. Further, the judge's refusal to adjourn the trial so that there could be a further investigation of the necessary data to prove racial under-representation prevented Pinkney from having a fair hearing on this fundamental constitutional issue.
For all of the courageous court watchers who went to the trial and were either badly treated or prevented from getting into the courtroom, Pinkney's lawyers have gathered affidavits from people about the fact that the television monitor where they were sent to watch jury selection did not work for about half the time. Further, even when it was working, it was not possible to see much, including the potential jurors.
After the trial began, security was tightened to the point where people were not allowed to enter the courtroom unless they were inside before the session began. Pinkney claims that these were violations of his constitutional right to a public trial.
The fact that the situation occurred at all is an indication of the overall fear and suspicion of Pinkney and his supporters by the Berrien County criminal justice system. The people who came to the trial were community supporters, church members, members of progressive organizations, progressive media, interested citizens, etc. They were united by one desire--to show support for a man who had fought for the community and was being falsely prosecuted because he was successful. They were respectful and interested. They represented no threat of disruption.
Pinkney's attorneys are preparing other motions for the sentencing and appeal. We will update you as they are filed.
WHAT CAN YOU DO NOW?
1. Forward this message, emphasizing the fact that especially with the positive polygraph test, the judge has a duty to avoid sentencing or imprisoning an innocent man.
2. Ask the judge to delay the sentencing in light of the proposed legislation reducing Pinkney's potential sentence.
3. Tell the judge that you want a full investigation of the jury system before Pinkney goes to jail. Tell him to give Pinkney a new trial under the new system.
4. Tell the judge that you, Pinkney, and his supporters are not violent, disruptive or threatening. You only want to see justice for Reverend Pinkney.
PLEASE SEND DIRECTLY TO:
Honorable Albert M. Butzbaugh Berrien County Circuit Court 811 Port Street St. Joseph, MI 49085-1187
AND A COPY TO:
Hugh M. Davis Constitutional Litigation Associates, P.C. 450 W. Fort Street, Suite 200 Detroit, MI 48226