Sunday, August 02, 2015

Iraq Authorities Plead With Kurdish PKK to Retreat From ISIS Fight Amid Turkish Air Strikes
AUGUST 02, 2015 7:02AM

TURKEY has killed 260 Kurdish militants in a week-long air offensive on targets in northern Iraq as regional Iraqi authorities said it was time the Kurds withdraw from the front line with ISIS as concerns grow over civilian casualties.

Turkey said it had launched a probe after pro-Kurdish media reports said nine civilians had been killed in a botched air strike, as the military pressed on with its relentless air bombardment campaign against Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) militants in northern Iraq.

Ankara has launched a two-pronged “anti-terror” offensive against Islamic State (IS) jihadists in Syria and PKK militants based in northern Iraq after a wave of attacks inside Turkey.

But so far the bombardments have focused far more on the Kurdish rebels and a report by Turkey’s official Anatolia news agency of 260 alleged PKK militants killed and up to 400 wounded was the first concrete indication of the scale of the casualties.

Turkish F-16 jets carried out more air strikes Saturday morning, NTV television said.

On Friday, 28 Turkish F-16s destroyed 65 targets of the PKK including shelters and arms depots, following heavy air strikes the day before when 80 Turkish aircraft hit 100 PKK targets, Anatolia said.

“For the peace and security of our people, the fight against terror organisations will continue without interruption,” the office of Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu said in a statement.

The PKK’s insurgency for greater rights and powers for Turkey’s Kurdish minority, begun more than 30 years ago, has left tens of thousands dead. A ceasefire declared in 2013 has been shattered by the current violence.

Iraqi Kurds tell PKK to go

Turkey’s Kurdish militants have sought cover in neighbouring northern Iraq where the presence of the PKK has long been tolerated in Iraq’s Kurdish-ruled region. More fighters also crossed into the area from Turkey as part of the 2013 ceasefire.

Yet the PKK’s relations with the autonomous Iraqi Kurdish authorities in Arbil have been beset by tensions, while Iraqi Kurds have expanded economic cooperation and relations with Turkey.

The office of the region’s president Massud Barzani said in a statement Saturday that the PKK rebels should move out of the region to prevent civilian casualties.

“The PKK must keep the battlefield away from the Kurdistan region in order for civilians not to become victims of this war,” it said.

The Kurdistan regional government issued a slightly softer statement urging the PKK to keep its “forces ... away from populated areas.” Iraqi Kurdish officials said Saturday six people had been killed in a pre-dawn strike by Turkish war planes on the village of Zarkel and there have been reports of civilian casualties.

The pro-PKK Firat news agency described the attack as a “massacre” which had left at least nine civilians dead.

The Turkish foreign ministry promised a “full investigation” into the claims but also accused the PKK of using civilians as “human shields”.

Anatolia said that among those wounded in the northern Iraq strikes was Nurettin Demirtas, the brother of the leader of the pro-Kurdish Peoples’ Democratic Party (HDP), Selahattin Demirtas.

Demirtas openly acknowledges that his elder brother Nurettin had gone to the Kandil Mountain in northern Iraq where the PKK’s military headquarters are based.

But he said Sunday he could not confirm the Anatolia report as Nurettin had moved on. He is “resisting IS on behalf of the people,” said Demirtas, without giving further details.

The Turkish authorities have also been upping the pressure on the HDP with prosecutors opening criminal investigations against both its co-leaders.

The HDP has angrily claimed that the current security crisis was provoked by President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to call snap elections and avenge the ruling party’s disappointing performance in June 7 polls.

Demirtas said Sunday that a legal adviser to Erdogan, Burhan Kuzu, was planning to close the party possibly “by the end of the year”.

“We will stop this fascist approach,” he said.

Within Turkey, at least 14 police and soldiers have been killed in attacks blamed on the PKK in the last 10 days in an escalating cycle of violence.

A Turkish soldier was killed Saturday in a mine attack in the Kars region of north-eastern Turkey, NTV television reported.

In the Catak district of the Van region in the east of Turkey, two suspected PKK members were killed overnight when they tried to attack the local police headquarters, Anatolia said.

It said a total of 10 “terrorists” had been killed in clashes in Turkey over the last few days.

Saturday, August 01, 2015

Pages From History: Dr. Kwame Nkrumah on the 14th Anniversary of the CPP, June 12, 1963
FOURTEENTH ANNIVERSARY OF THE CONVENTION PEOPLE’S PARTY
Accra, June 12, 1963

Today marks the fourteenth year of the birth of our Party and l take this opportunity to salute all Party Comrades for their sustained effort and solidarity, their heroic struggle and vigilance throughout the years of our existence as a Party.

As we celebrate this Anniversary today, it is useful once again to re-examine our position and analyse the present stage of the struggle. Before we do so, however, let us, as usual bow our heads in a minute’s silence and remember all those comrades of our dear Party who gave up their lives in the cause of our country’s freedom.

On previous Anniversary occasions, we have recounted the glorious history of our Party, the strategy and tactics which it adopted to circumvent and rout Colonialism in Ghana. Although the struggle continues unabated, I must point out that the emphasis of the struggle has now shifted to the African scene and I crave your indulgence to turn to this sphere before coming home to our internal affairs, as this anniversary follows closely on the historic Addis Ababa Conference. You all remember what I said on the declaration of our Independence in 1957, namely: "That the independence of Ghana is meaningless unless it is linked up with the total liberation of the African Continent."

These words form the cornerstone of our Foreign Policy. In April, 1958, a Conference of Independent African States was held here at which date there were only 8 Independent African States.

Today as I have said, following subsequent Conferences organised on our initiative in pursuance of our policy, there are 31 Independent African States. This phenomenal rise in the number of Independent States of Africa is a vindication of the correctness of our African Policy. It also shows the soundness of our philosophy on the African liberation Movement and African Unity.

A new period has opened in contemporary African history with the convening of the Addis Ababa Conference, a period in which the peoples of Africa have demonstrated their revolutionary determination to forge a common indissoluble link in shaping their collective effort to the collective advantage of their own peoples. The realisation of this noble aim is a hopeful step in the consolidation of world peace, because the existence of colonialism in all its forms in Africa and for that matter anywhere in the world constitutes a threat to world peace.

We live in an age when the peoples of Africa are resolutely throwing off the abominable yoke of colonialism, in order to organise their national economies in the paramount interest of their peoples after centuries of foreign unjust domination.

The theme of Addis Ababa was, "The Unity of the African Peoples;" in order to attain the overwhelming economic, financial and cultural advantage which lie readily available to all of us upon our unity. What I have striven to emphasise is that although political independence has been proclaimed, the struggle for independence still continues because political independence is not the end; it is a means to an end.

Our political independence must be used to raise the standard of living of our peoples. But our concrete African conditions demand that all African states mould work together for the consolidation of their gains in the liberation of our people. We can survive only within the context of African Unity and independence.

Now I turn to Party Organisation. The new tasks of the Party at the present stage of the struggle coupled with the role which our country plays in international affairs make it necessary for the organisation of our Party to be streamlined and strengthened to enable it to cope with the new responsibilities Ghana is committed to discharge. Accordingly, our Party must ever be concerned with multiplying and strengthening its contacts with the masses of the people and winning their confidence as their defenders against the evils of poverty, disease, hunger, ignorance and squalor to whose elimination we are dedicated.

The Party gains strength with the masses, if it practises inner Party democracy and self-criticism. All members of our Party should be encouraged in every possible way to take active part in discussing all major questions of Party life. If this is done, it will follow conclusively that all decisions of the Party are decisions of the entire membership who will correctly understand and appreciate them. Democracy will then be at its plenitude throughout all the levels of our Party. I must once again emphasise that the masses of the people form the backbone of our Party and their living conditions and their welfare must be paramount in everything we do. It is for them in particular and Africa in general that our Party exists. So much for our tact with the masses of the people.

To achieve the foregoing objectives, there is a clear need to reorganise the Party so that it touches every single individual wherever he or she may live in order not only to bring the entire people into participation in the administration of the country, but also to make it impossible to external and internal reactionaries and their agents to interfere with the security of our State and the progress being made in all spheres of our national life. Our Party has shown by its victory over Colonialism and all its new forms in our dear land that it can cope with any situation for which it prepares itself and we must fortify our ranks with mass vigilance to deal a death-blow at subversion and other un-Ghanaian activities wherever they may rear their ugly head. For this reason, the Party must now base its organisation on reaching the people directly by house to-house and street by street method, all over the country, so that we may chase out the enemy, routing him without giving him a moment’s rest to re-group his forces.

Our Party’s new down-to-earth organisation will also enable our development work to be tackled more forcefully and on mass basis, as we shall be able to bring everyone into useful local activity.

As l have written elsewhere, l will not hide the fact that l am impatient when it comes to building Ghana, and this task rests on the shoulders of my colleagues in Government. We have to get on with the job resolutely in order to fulfil our promises to the people. Each Minister must regard himself as a managing director and get his particular job done in the allotted time, and properly done. Success follows organisation and inauguration. Real difficulties leading to legitimate delay always receive understanding consideration. But the driving urge to succeed must permeate every branch of government, steaming from the ministerial fountain-head, who must combine a high sense of responsibility with a high sense of urgency. Ministers and Party officials must show themselves as examples to the people by their devotion to their work, by simple living, by leading in service.

Ghana faces immense difficulties in her task of reconstruction. It is by no means a simple business to raise educational levels, to train skilled workers and to impart a sense of responsibility speedily, especially in circumstances of restricted availability of local qualified personnel and material resources. Nevertheless, there is much that can be done quickly, if everyone puts every ounce of ability and strength into the building of the nation. It is a prime task of leadership in Ghana to make the people aware of the compelling need to put forth their most intense effort on behalf of the progress of the country.

A new stage is set for Party ideological education. Every Party member must now be educated to understand precisely what the Party stands for. The philosophy of our Party, which had led to victory over Colonialism in our country and which governs our international relations or more particularly our relations with other African countries, has been proved sound and correct through its application in practice, the concrete situation in Africa. This Philosophy has been profusely propounded in various forms and underlines our full realisation of party education. In our Programme for work and Happiness is embodied, the concrete results of our political awakening and ideological understanding. To understand the ideology of our Party is to appreciate the need to improve the well-being of the greatest number of the people.

May God give us peace in our time to work for the welfare of the people of Ghana, Africa and the world
Page From History: Dr. Kwame Nkrumah on Ghana's 7-Year Development Plan, March 11, 1964
Dr. Kwame Nkrumah of Africa, the first president
of modern day Ghana. Nkrumah was a leading
Pan-Africanist and socialist who was overthrown by
the CIA and the US State Departmen in 1966.
11th March, 1964

I have come here today to present to you, and to the people of Ghana, our Seven-Year Development Plan, which when completed, will bring Ghana to the threshold of a modem State based on a highly organised and efficient agricultural and industrial programme.

The main tasks of the Plan are: firstly, to speed up the rate of growth of our national economy. Secondly, it is to enable us to embark upon the socialist transformation of our economy through the rapid development of the State and cooperative sectors. Thirdly, it is our aim, by this Plan, to eradicate completely the colonial structure of our economy. On this occasion, let me take the opportunity here and now to thank all those experienced men and women, Ghanaians and non Ghanaians, who have contributed so much to the preparation of this Plan.

Mr. Speaker, when the Convention People’s Party came to power in 1951, the pace of development was so slow and confused that we decided to speed it up by attempting to implement in five years, the programme of reconstruction which was designed by the colonial administration to take place over a period of ten years. That programme was not a development plan. It was a collection of various individual petty projects that had to be built in preparation for future planning.

At the conclusion of this programme, it became necessary to pause for two years in order to consolidate our position. By the time we reached the stage of implementing the next phase of our programme, it had already become quite clear to us that the only real solution to the reconstruction of Ghana lay in the long run, in the adoption of a socialist and cooperative programme for industry, and the mechanisation and diversification of our agriculture. Our hopes in this regard lay in the Volta River Project, about which 1 will have more to say later on.

Mr. Speaker, this Seven-Year Development Plan which 1 now lay before you is therefore the first really integrated and comprehensive economic plan ever drawn up for Ghana’s development after a thorough examination of our needs and resources. The Plan is designed to give effect to the Party’s Programme of Work and Happiness which has already been accepted by the country. It also embodies a long view of the path which should lead to a self-sustaining economy, based on socialist production and distribution. An economy balanced between industry and agriculture, providing a sufficiency of food for the people, and supporting secondary industries based on the products of our agriculture. In other words, an economy founded securely on the basis of socialist production and distribution.

Our aim, under this Plan, is to build in Ghana, a socialist State which accepts full responsibility for promoting the well-being of the masses. Our national wealth must be built up and used in such a way that economic power shall not be allowed to exploit the worker in town or village, but be used for the supreme welfare and happiness of our people. The people, through the State, should have an effective share in the economy of the country and an effective control over it.

A socialist Ghana must also secure for every citizen, at the earliest possible date, an adequate level of education and nutrition and a satisfactory standard of clothing, housing and leisure.

The Party has always proclaimed socialism as the objective of our social, industrial and economic programmes. Socialism, however, will continue to remain a slogan until industrialisation is achieved. Socialism demands a very different kind of planning and economic structure from the type that was evolved by the colonial administration. This is why in l96l, we set up a Planning Commission and charged it with the responsibility for drawing up this Development Plan which I present to you today as an installment in the process by which we hope to turn Ghana into the sort of country we envisage.

A socialist State cannot come by itself nor can it be established by the formulation of plans. Socialism has to be worked for and even sacrificed for. Socialism, which is aimed at the emancipation of the people from exploitation, has to be built by the people. It is the expression of the people whose Government accepts responsibility for promoting their welfare to the fullest possible extent.

Our youth from the primary schools, through the secondary schools to the universities and higher institutions of learning, should and must be taught and trained in the socialist philosophy. They must be taught to know the working of neo-colonialism and trained to recognise it wherever it may rear its head. They must not only know the trappings of colonialism and imperialism, but they must also be able to smell out the hide-outs of neo-colonialism.

In this endeavour, we shall expect from each citizen, a maximum contribution to the national economy according to his ability and training. It is only in proportion to the contribution which each of us makes to the work of the Nation that we can expect to share in the material gains which the socialist development of the economy will make possible.

Mr. Speaker, in order to accomplish our objectives, we have decided that the economy of Ghana will, for some time to come, remain a mixed economy in which a vigorous public and cooperative sector will operate along with the private sector. Let me make it clear that our socialist objectives demand that the public and cooperative sector of the productive economy should expand at the maximum possible rate, especially in those strategic areas of production upon which the economy of the country essentially depends.

We are determined that the economic independence of Ghana shall be achieved and maintained so as to avoid the social antagonisms resulting from the unequal distribution of economic power. We are equally determined to ensure that the operation of a mixed economy leads to the socialist transformation we envisage, and not to the defeat of our socialist aims. It is essential, therefore, that we should remind ourselves at all times of the necessity;
• Firstly, to promote to the maximum, the development of the State and cooperative sectors;
• secondly, to regulate the pattern of State investment in order to give the highest priority to productive investment, and
• Thirdly, to determine and direct the forms and conditions of foreign investment, in order to safeguard our socialist policy and national independence.

In this way, we shall ensure that the growth rate of the public and cooperative sector of our economy will exceed the growth rate of the private, sector, particularly in industry and agriculture.

Mr. Speaker, as you know, we have already established many industrial projects and enterprises, as a means of securing our economic independence and assisting in the national control of the economy. I must make it clear that these State Enterprises were not set up to lose money at the expense of the tax payers. Like all business undertakings, they are expected to maintain themselves efficiency, and to show profits. Such profits should be sufficient to build up capital for further investment as well as to finance a large proportion of the public services which it is the responsibility of the State to provide.

In every socialist country, state enterprises provide the bulk of State revenues, and we intend to follow the same pattern here. Our State Enterprises will be set yearly, financial and production targets so that they may work towards definite objectives and goals and thereby given every stimulus to operate efficiently and profitably. Hence, the managers of our State Enterprises, and those in charge of our State organisations and apparatus should be men trained in management; honest and dedicated men; men with integrity; men who are incorruptible.

When we have succeeded in establishing these principles, Government will then be in a position to lower taxes progressively, to lessen steadily the burden of taxation on the people and eventually to abolish many of them, if not all of them.

I have set up a State Management Committee to bring these ideas to life and to help in building up strong, well managed, efficient and profitable State enterprises.

I intend, however, that the State Management Committee shall do more than that. I want to ensure that the people of this country are fully informed of Government’s intentions and plans, particularly with regard to industrialisation and agriculture. The people have every right to be fully informed in order that they may know what our objectives are, what progress we are making and how Government funds are being spent in the interest of this country’s economic development.

I am convinced that with this knowledge will come that understanding which will give our people the necessary impetus to do all they can to help achieve our objectives for work and happiness and accelerated development.

Mr. Speaker, foreign investment as the private sector of our industrial development can play an important role in our economy. It has a valuable contribution to make to our economy and to the attainment of certain specific objectives. Among these will be production of consumer goods, the local processing of Ghanaian raw material and the utilization of Ghana’s natural resources in those lines of economic activity where a large volume of investment is required.

We expect, however, that such investments will not be operated so as to exploit our people. On the contrary, we expect such enterprises to assist in the expansion of the economy of the country in line with our general objectives.

Foreign investment enterprises will contribute personal initiative, managerial ability and technical skills towards the development of the country. They will also further the growth of similar initiative, ability, technical skills and habits of saving among Ghanaians.

We welcome foreign investors in a spirit of partnership. They can earn their profits here, provided they leave us an agreed portion for promoting the welfare and happiness of our people as a whole as against the greedy ambitions of the few. From what we get out of this partnership, we hope to be able to expand the health services of our people, to feed and house them well, to give them more and better educational institutions and to see to it that they have a rising standard of living. This in a nutshell is what we expect from our socialist objectives.

Mr. Speaker, in pursuing these objectives, we shall exert our efforts towards the maximum extension of the public sector within the productive economy. As I have said, within this framework, we do not intend or desire to limit private investment.

Our Government has always insisted that the operations of all economic enterprises in Ghana should conform to the national economic objectives and be subject to the rules and regulations which are made in pursuance of our socialist policies. Our experience has been that foreign investors have been willing to invest in Ghana so long as the limits within which they can work are fair and clearly defined, and we shall continue to consult with them in order to ensure that cooperation is as full as possible.

Ghana’s economy, particularly at the present stage, has room for all the investment capital which is likely to be provided by foreign investors, by the Central and Local Governments and by individual Ghanaians. In this respect, l believe that there are a considerable number of individual Ghanaians who are in a position materially to assist in finding the necessary capital for the Seven-Year Development Plan.

One of the worst features of colonialism was that it produced an unbalanced economy in which there was little room for investment of the profits which were made by expatriate firms. In colonial days, it was natural that profits made in Ghana should be invested abroad. Today, the situation is entirely different. An investor who lays out his money wisely in Ghana is likely to make a larger profit, than if he invested it in a more developed country. Nevertheless, old habits of investment persist and there are a considerable number of Ghanaians who still maintain their savings in foreign investments and in property outside Ghana.

Under our Exchange Control laws, it is of course, illegal for Ghanaians to have property abroad without having declared this to the appropriate authorities. This aspect of our law is not always understood. The Government has therefore decided not to penalise any Ghanaian firm or individual who, within the next three months, repatriates foreign holdings of money to Ghana, or who declares ownership of foreign property. A thorough investigation is afoot to discover the extent of holdings of foreign exchange and properties by Ghanaians, and those who do not take advantage of this offer, but continues to conceal their foreign assets, must expect, after the three-month period of grace, to be subject to the full rigours of the law.

Mr. Speaker, the Seven-Year Development Plan makes provisions for a maximum volume of investment from all sources. We intend that the State should retain control of the strategic branches of the economy, including public utilities, raw materials and heavy industry. The State will also participate in light and consumer goods industries in which the rates of return on capital should be highest. We intend also that those industries which provide the basic living needs of the people shall be State-owned, in order to prevent any exploitation.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, let me now turn to the specific proposals of the Seven-Year Plan. In the next seven years, it is proposed that there will be a total expenditure of one-thousand and sixteen million pounds, that is, over a billion pounds sterling, on development projects in the Plan. Of this total, it is intended that four-hundred and seventy-six million pounds should be provided by the Central Government foreign investors, individual Ghanaians, Local Authorities and the Cooperative sector are expected to invest about four-hundred and forty million pounds. We also hope that individual Ghanaians will contribute nearly one-hundred million pounds worth of direct labour in the construction of buildings, in community development and in the extension of their farms.

The total government investment will be four-hundred and seventy-six million pounds. Investment throughout the Seven-Year Plan period will average one-hundred and thirty million pounds a year. Of this, approximately one half, or sixty-six million pounds a year, will be invested by Government, and the rest by private investors.

We continue to look to the outside world to contribute to our national development. We expect the more advanced and industrialised countries to facilitate our trade in primary commodities and manufactured goods so that we can finance the bulk of our development out of our own resources and earnings.

We hope that where necessary, the Government of Ghana will be able to borrow money on reasonable terms for essential and productive projects. Let me say again that we welcome foreign investors to come and invest in Ghana’s progress. We offer them every assistance, substantial material benefits, and the advantages of a coherent long-term economic strategy which will give them plenty of scope for planning and development. At the same time, we expect them to re-invest an adequate share of their profits in the further progress, both of Ghana and of themselves.

In order to be able to manage these new investments as well as our existing capital with the maximum of efficiency, the country needs a well-trained labour force under competent management. In this sense, the educational programme under the Plan is crucial to the success of the whole Plan. It is directed towards giving education .in Ghana a new and more practical orientation and making it available to all who can profit by it. In order to make real economic progress, Ghana must adopt an improved technology in all lines of production. We look to the educational system and educational institutions to equip our people with the latest advancements in industrial and agricultural technology. We expect our academy of sciences and our research organisations to adapt this technology to the conditions of Ghana. And we look to the managers of our enterprises to adopt the technology which is developed and to foster skills by a maximum programme of “on the job” training.

The development of Ghana has hitherto not been sufficiently balanced between different parts of the country. It is the deliberate policy of this Plan to correct this imbalance. Naturally, we must develop in each part of the country the type of economic activity to which it is best suited by reason of natural resources and geographical location. But a special effort has to be made in order to ensure that the rate of progress in the less favoured parts of the country is even greater than the rate of progress in those sections which have hitherto been more favoured. It is only by this means that we can achieve a more harmonious national development.

In the present Plan period, it is proposed to pay special attention to the modernising of agriculture in the savannah areas of the Northern and Upper Regions. It is hoped through secondary industries based on agricultural raw material, to turn the Northern areas into major sources of food supplies for the whole country. In this regard, the Government has recognised the importance of irrigation and water conservation in the country, and has already initiated far reaching plans for major schemes of irrigation and water conservation. Mr. Speaker, the backbone of Ghana’s agriculture has always been its farmers who, particularly in recent years, have made a fine contribution to the economy and expressed their patriotism in a number of unselfish ways. The developments the Government is proposing in the areas of State and cooperative farming will bring them a share of the local facilities they have so long been denied. More than this: they will have the opportunity also to share in the up-to-date techniques of farming that must be employed, if greater yields and diversity of crops are to be attained.

I want our farmers to understand that the State Farms and Cooperative enterprises are not being encouraged as alternatives to peasant farming. The interests of individual peasant farmers will not be made subservient to those of the State Farms and Cooperatives. We need the efforts of our individual farmers more than ever, along with our State Farms and Cooperatives, if we are to achieve, at an increased pace, the agricultural targets we have set ourselves. We look to our individual peasant farmers for the enlargement of investment in our agriculture.

Mr. Speaker, as I have stressed time and again, the revolution taking place in Ghana is chiefly a revolution of the workers and the tillers of the land. A vital phase of this revolution is the implementation of the Seven-Year Development Plan which aims at the total expansion of all sections of our economy to raise the standard of living of the people of Ghana. I am happy that the workers have demonstrated their complete dedication to our revolutionary cause. Upon the attainment of independence, the Party, as the conscious political vanguard of the Trade Union Movement, worked with the Trade Unions and created a new and more effective structure of the Trades Union Congress. Government supported the desire of the workers for this new Trade Union structure.

Thus, we were able to create in our labour and industrial laws, conditions for resolving quickly and expeditiously, the problems of our working population. This, also, the workers accepted the responsibility to contribute to the economic and social reconstruction of our economy.

In the State sector of our economy, the workers employed in our State Corporations will be afforded full and equal opportunities for participating in the planning and execution of our industrial projects. It is only in this way that the workers will closely identify themselves with the attainment of the economic and social objectives of our new society and will thus equate their own welfare with the prosperity of our country. Such new working relationships will enable the workers to acquire the sense of complete belonging and full participation and they will no longer consider themselves as working for colonialist exploiters. I have given instructions that some of our State enterprises be handed over completely to the workers who will manage them for themselves on behalf of the State.

The success of this Seven-Year Development Plan will only be attained, if the enthusiasm of our workers is mobilized and they know the part they ought to play and are drawn into full consultation in the execution of our Plan.

I therefore call upon all workers, farmers, fishermen and peasants of our country to accept this challenge and fulfil the hopes and aspirations of our people.

Mr. Speaker, when I spoke at the opening of the Unilever Soap Factory at Tema on the 24th August, 1963, l said among other things that, in order to pay tribute to the importance of labour in the development of Ghana, the Government has decided to institute a special Order to be known as the "Order of the Black Star of Labour." Details of this Order, which will rank among the highest honours of the State, have now been worked out and all classes of labour will qualify for this Order. It is my confident expectation that this award will provide an ample incentive to all workers, and that every worker of the nation will make it his ambition to qualify for the title of Worker of the Year and to become heroes and heroines of Labour.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, I am happy to inform the House that on present estimates, it is confidently expected that the Volta River Project will begin to generate electrical power by September, 1965. On that date, we shall come to the end of one phase of our cherished goal and usher in the beginning of a new and more exciting endeavour to utilise the vast electric power which will be at the country’s disposal for the enrichment of our economy and our people.

Completion of the Volta Project will enable us to develop the industrial potential of Ghana. Indeed, the possibilities for our agriculture and industry will be completely revolutionised. First and foremost, the Volta Project will increase by nearly 500 percent, the installed electrical capacity of the country. Nearly one half of this new capacity will be taken up by the aluminium smelter in Tema. But there will be an ample reserve of power for other users, and Ghana will have liberated herself decisively from the possibility of power shortage becoming again a brake on the rate of economic progress.

I would like in this context to point out the degree to which the Volta Scheme fits into our chosen combination of a mixed economy with socialist and co-operative goals. A major part of the scheme is being financed by the Ghana Government; but the American and British Governments have joined in the financing of it, together with the World Bank, and we have had the most helpful and fruitful collaboration with American enterprise in the shape of the Kaiser Group of Industries.

Meanwhile, our Italian contractors, Impregilo, have achieved the remarkable feat of taking one year off the time of construction of the dam. Throughout the scheme, we have worked together in the greatest harmony. I regard this great scheme as an example of the way in which careful and proper planning together with foreign investment, public control and participation, and the devoted labours of the people can revolutionize the economic base of society.

Such an achievement can have significance far beyond Ghana’s frontiers. It is only by strengthening our economy in this way that we can make an effective contribution to our brothers in Africa and the political unification of our continent. In this endeavour the Seven-Year Plan makes provision for the undertaking of joint enterprises in individual fields of industry and also for the harmonisation of our total programme of economic development with that of other African countries.

The Plan we are launching today, relates to projects and developments which we wish to see take place in Ghana. It grieves me that we in Ghana, who so strongly advocate the unity of the African Continent, should be forced to take so narrow a view of planning. I have advocated for closer union of Africa, times without number. I have emphasised the need for a continental union Government for Africa as the only solution to Africa’s ills and problems. Since the Addis Ababa Conference, it has been made abundantly clear that artificial borders which we inherited from the colonial powers should be made obsolete and unnecessary. While we wait for the setting up of a Union Government for Africa, we must begin immediately to harmonize our plans for Africa’s total development. For example, I see no reason why the independent African States should not, with advantage to each other, join together in an economic union and draw up together a joint Development Plan which will give us greater scope and flexibility to our mutual advantage. By the same token, I see no reason why the independent African States should not have common shipping and air lines in the interest of improved services and economy. With such rationalisation of our economic policies, we could have common objectives and thus, eliminate unnecessary competition and frontier barriers and disputes.

As every day passes, it is becoming clearer and clearer that it is only the establishment of a Union Government of Africa which can save our separate States not only from neo-colonialism, but from imperialism itself. We in Ghana are determined to make our wholehearted contribution towards this objective. We are prepared to make whatever further provisions may be required to enable us to play our part in the achievement and consolidation of African Unity.

Recent events in East Africa and in other parts of Africa have shown how urgent is the need for the establishment of a central machinery for dealing with the serious political and economic questions confronting us in Africa today.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, the object of the Seven-Year Plan which I have out—lined to you is to modernise our agriculture and develop our industry as a basis of our socialist society. I, for my part, am determined that the Plan shall succeed. Its success must rest on the support of each and every one of you and on the devotion and hard work of the officials, Heads of Corporations and Enterprises, whose duty it will be to translate the Plan into action. In the seven years ahead, all our energies must be concentrated on its implementation.

It has long been apparent that the administrative machinery which we inherited was not designed for a country working within the framework of an overall plan, and in which the activities of individual agencies of the nation are directed to clearly defined goals of development. An effective reform of the governmental machinery is therefore needed, if the Seven-Year Plan is not to falter on the inadequacies of administration. The first task in this regard will be to attune more closely, the policies and actions of every agency or organ of Government to the overall national policy as defined in the Seven-Year Development Plan.

I have caused to be published with the Seven-Year Plan, a guide to its implementation. This guide should be studied most carefully by Members of this House, by the Party and Government officials, Managers of State Enterprises, the farmers’ organisation, the Trades Union Congress and all those who will be concerned with the implementation of the Plan.

I have, earlier this month, established several organisations whose responsibility it will be to see to the rapid execution of the Plan. These are, firstly, the National Planning Commission, through which the people will be associated with the Plan, and which will be enlarged to include Ministers, Regional Commissioners, representatives of Corporations and organisations and integral wings of the Party.

Secondly, the State Planning Committee which, under my Chairmanship, will be the key body for co-ordinating action and policy on the Plan, and for giving directions on its execution and implementation.

Thirdly, there is the Budget Committee, which will make recommendations for the policy of the annual budget.

Fourthly, the Foreign Exchange Committee, which will make recommendations regarding the size of yearly imports and exports.

And lastly, though by no means the least, there is the State Management Committee which will direct the operations and activities of State Corporations and State Enterprises in order to ensure their efficient and profitable management.

I am sure that if these five bodies carry out their duties honestly and energetically, we shall achieve and even exceed our goals under this Plan. We might even complete the Plan ahead of schedule that is to say in less than seven years.

Mr. Speaker, all our efforts should henceforth be directed to ensuring that everything is done to make this Plan a success. I am sure that all the people of this country are determined in their efforts to ensure that we achieve all our Plan objectives and make our country a happy, progressive, prosperous and advanced nation. We must therefore ensure that State funds and resources are not frittered away uselessly or wastefully or that they find their way into private pockets.

We shall, in order to implement the Plan, be awarding a number of contracts to organisations both here and abroad; we shall also be entering into sales agreements as well as acquiring goods locally. I intend that all contracts whether for the construction of factories or offices, or for any purchase or sale, should be so safeguarded that our funds will be properly husbanded and utilised for Ghana’s advancement and for the welfare and happiness of the people.

In order that our resources are not waste by corrupt practices and in order to prevent any attempts at personal greed and aggrandisement at the expense of the people and the State, steps will be taken to ensure that no contractor, shall offer or give or agree to give to any person in the service of the Government of Ghana any gift or consideration of any kind as an inducement or reward for doing, or forbearing to do, or for having done any act in relation to the obtaining or execution of any contract for the Government of Ghana, or for showing favour or disfavour to any person in relation to any other contract for the Government of Ghana.

We shall also see to it that no contractor shall enter into any contract with the Government of Ghana in connection with which a commission has been paid or agreed to be paid by him or on his behalf, or to his knowledge, unless before the contract is made, particulars of any such commission and of the terms and conditions of any agreement for the payment thereof have been disclosed in writing to a special committee to be appointed by me to represent the Government of Ghana.

Any breach of these conditions shall entitle the Government to determine any contract, and recover from the contractor the amount of any loss which may have resulted from such determination and the amount or value of any such gifts, consideration or commission.

I have therefore directed that every contract for the supply of goods and services or for the execution of any Government project shall embody clauses to give effect to this decision. These conditions are being made in the interest of the tax payer who ultimately has to find the money to pay for these gifts and bribes.

I want the world to know that we shall do everything to set our own house in order. I want all of us here in Ghana also to realise that nothing must be allowed to hamper our efforts to achieve our Plan objectives and that no individuals will be permitted to hamper that effort, to retard our advancement in any way or to grow rich by corrupt practices. Those who have ears to hear, let them hear. The progress, welfare and happiness of the masses is our supreme concern.

Mr. Speaker, we know that the desire of people is to have enough to eat without spending too great a part of their income upon food. They want a reasonably comfortable place to sleep; they want light, a ready supply of water, education for the growing children and future generation, adequate medical care and welfare services. Our present plan will go a long way to fulfilling these very legitimate desires of the people. The Volta project will provide us with abundant light and water. In addition, a whole programme of irrigation and water development is engaging our attention very seriously.

Housing, too, is one of our main preoccupations. We are at this moment in the last stages of formulating large-scale housing projects, which we hope to have ready soon. A factory for prefabricated concrete units is now under construction and will come into production sometime this year. When these plans are completed, we shall be able to put up low-cost housing to meet the needs of our working people at the rate of about two hundred houses a month. This should go a long way to offset the pressing housing problem.

In transforming the many centres of over-crowded and insanitary housing that at present exist in some areas, we shall look carefully into the traditional community customs of our people and will, wherever it is feasible and possible, try to maintain such communities in their traditional locations, but with a newer, better and more pleasant look.

Mr. Speaker, we would be hampering our advance to socialism, if we were to encourage the growth of Ghanaian private capitalism in our midst. This would, of course, be in antipathy to our economic and social objectives. There are some few among us who are seeking outlets for small enterprises. Such people we appreciate have initiative which it would be well to employ suitably in our socialist undertakings. There are some who have small capital savings which they consider they can profitably employ in business that will provide goods and services which are in public demand. Such small businessmen will be encouraged to operate enterprises provided they accept certain limitations as the Government will find it necessary to impose as to the size of the enterprise and the number of persons to be employed in their undertakings.

In this connection, it is necessary to distinguish between two types of business which have grown up within recent years. The first is the type which it is the Government’s intention to encourage, that of the small businessman who employs his capital in an industry or trade with which he is familiar, and in so doing, fulfils a public need.

The second type is very different. It consists of that class of Ghanaian businesses which are modelled on the old type of colonial exploitation. Individuals, who can command capital, use their money not in productive endeavour, but by the purchase and re-sale, at high prices, of such commodities as fish, salt and other items of food and consumer goods which are in demand by the people. This type of business serves no social purpose and steps will be taken to see that our banking resources are not used to provide credit for this type of business.

Even more harmful to the economy is yet another type of enterprise in which some Ghanaians have been participating. This consists of setting up bogus agencies for foreign companies which are in fact nothing, but organisations for distributing bribes and exerting improper pressures on behalf of foreign companies. lt is the intention of the Government to carry out a wholesale investigation into the activities of these firms. They can do incalculable harm to our economy and they must be ruthlessly suppressed.

The initiative of Ghanaian businessmen will not be cramped, but we must take steps to see that it is channelled towards desirable social ends and is not expended in the exploitation of the community. The Government will encourage Ghanaian businessmen to join with each other in cooperative forms of organisation. In this way, Ghanaian businessmen will be able to contribute actively in broadening the vitality of our economy and cooperation, and will provide a stronger form of organisation than can be achieved through individual small businesses.

We must also discourage anything that can threaten our socialist construction. For this reason, no Ghanaian will be allowed to take up shares in any enterprise under foreign investment. On tile contrary, we shall l encourage our people with savings to invest in the State sector and cooperative undertakings. I know that among our Ghanaian businessmen, there are some who are ready and willing to turn their businesses into cooperative undertakings. Where well run private enterprises are offered to and taken over by the State or cooperative undertakings, we hope that businessmen will offer themselves as managers and administrators.

In the same way, Mr. Speaker, I want to refer to money-lending which, along with other problems, has been left to us by colonialism. I know that many of those who are carrying on this business of lending money at criminal rates of interest are non-Ghanaians. But, unhappily, not a few of our own people have joined the ranks of those who make quick and easy money out of the difficulties and misery of others. Money-lending and usury are intolerable and inconsistent with the ideals of a socialist state. We should see to it that this practice is eliminated from our society.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, I am sure that imbued with the spirit of the Party’s programme of Work and Happiness, all those who are responsible for the interpretation and implementation of this Plan will do their work honestly and devotedly. It may be that, in the course of the next seven years some of us will from time to time attempt to change the choice of emphasis that we have made and try to direct proportionately more of our national resources into immediate welfare services and proportionately less into agriculture and industry. It will be the duty of those who are charged with the implementation of the Plan to ensure that these pressures are resisted. Otherwise, we shall end up in the long run with an economy weak in its productive base and backward in its level of technology.

The Seven-Year Development Plan can only be accounted a success, if by 1970, the year in which we conclude the Plan and the year in which we celebrate the Tenth Anniversary of our Republic, we can truly say that the productive base of the economy has been revolutionised and that the level of technology and productivity in Ghana is approaching modem standards over the adequate area of the national economy.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, 1964, the year in which we launch the Seven-Year Development Plan, will be hailed as the turning point in the history of Ghana. In a little over a year from now, we shall be generating electricity from the Volta River Project to feed our expanding factories throughout the country. The Kwame Nkrumah Steel Works in Tema will soon be completed. Tema Harbour itself is already being extended to meet the needs of our expanding economy, and in Tema a growing number of industrial projects are already in production and more are being established. In this connection, I want to mention, particularly, the Aluminium Smelter which will produce aluminium for domestic consumption and export, the Dry Dock and Ship Repair
Yard which will be one of the finest and biggest in Africa and the Accra Tema Freeway, which will provide fast and safe travelling between the capital and the port of Tema.

I can already see, in my mind’s eye, a picture of Ghana as it will be by the end of the Plan period. I see a State with a strong and virile economy, its agriculture and industry buoyant and prosperous, an industrialised nation serving the needs of its people.
Let us therefore, as from today, move forward together, united in devotion and determination, to give of our best in the execution and implementation of this Seven-Year Plan.

Mr. Speaker, Members of the National Assembly, it gives me a great pleasure on this historic occasion, and in this House, to launch our Seven-Year Development Plan.

I now leave you to your deliberations. May you continue to be guided by Providence in the highest interests of our Nation.
Despite Differences in Agenda, Obama's Africa Visit 'May Herald Bright Future Relations'
Gamal Nkrumah
Ahram Online
Thursday 30 Jul 2015

PANW Editor's Note: We wonder what this author's father, Dr. Kwame Nkrumah, the president of Ghana's First Republic, a leading Pan-Africanist and chief strategist of the African Revolution, would have thought of such an analysis of US imperialism's designs on the continent in the 21st century. The author, who is based in Egypt, should know quite well the impact of Washington's foreign policy in Africa. Saying that the major impediment to Africa's "growth" and not development, is the lack of good governance and corruption, regurgitating the line of the Obama administration, is a complete distortion of modern day realities. By not mentioning imperialism as the source of the underdevelopment of Africa over the last six centuries, absolves the West of the historical and contemporary culpability for the failed "growth" agendas of the last five to six decades. It is imperialism which has fostered instability through the ongoing unequal terms of trade, intelligence and military penetration of Africa. Overall the volume of trade between Africa and the US has declined by 40 percent since Obama has been in office. Yet Pentagon and Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) activity has accelerated resulting in the continuing maintenance of military rule in Egypt, the destruction of Libya, the partitioning of Sudan and the fragmentation as well as famine and sectarianism in Somalia and Kenya, among other issues. Until Africa breaks with imperialism there cannot be any genuine development on the continent. The phenomenal "growth" scenario in Africa one year and the decline in currency values, labor unrest and near bankruptcy the next, such as the situations in Nigeria and Ghana, is not an anomaly but two sides of the same underlying crisis of neo-colonialism.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
President Obama's five-day trip to the African continent put in focus a number of prickly issues. What was the US agenda and what will be the repercussions?

"By the pricking of my thumbs, Something wicked this way comes" — Shakespeare, Macbeth.

But perhaps the presidential tour portends good and not evil, a prophetic omen that unfolds as Africa changes with the times. Only time will tell.

Africa and the United States may not often see their agendas overlap. At any rate, there are 55 countries on the African continent. Of these nations, 54 are members of the African Union. Morocco is the only African nation that is not a member of the AU. Presumably, every African nation has its own agenda, with the possible exception of the failed and fragile states, and there are several of these in Africa.

Kenya and Ethiopia, neither of them in the least can be labeled failed states and are the two East African nations that US President Barack Obama visited this week, have an unambiguous agenda. The problem is with hidden agendas, as they are as abstruse as they are profound. Washington's agenda is also categorical.

"People are being lifted out of poverty, incomes are up, the middle class is growing and young people like you are harnessing technology to change the way Africa is doing business," Obama said, addressing a pan-African audience in Kenya amid rapturous applause.

Obama's Kenyan counterpart, Uhuru Kenyatta, concurred. "The narrative of African despair is false, and indeed was never true," Kenyatta declared. "Let them know that Africa is open and ready for business," Kenyatta expounded.

True, but Africa is doing brisk business with China and not with America. So is the US competing with China for markets in the continent one of Washington's hidden agendas?

Obama is the first US president to address the African Union, ironically at its Chinese-built headquarters in the Ethiopian capital Addis Ababa. Obama held talks with regional leaders on the ongoing civil war in South Sudan, a failed state. Obama spoke about the "cancer of corruption," that threatens to derail the African economic boom. He contended that corruption was "draining billions of dollars" from the emerging economies of Africa.

Government malfeasance is at the heart of Africa's political malaise. Yet, American complicity counts. And the double standards that Washington adopts with impunity have far-reaching repercussions. Take the cases of Kenya and Ethiopia. Washington has turned a blind eye to human rights violations primarily because the two nations are allies in the US-led war against terrorism in East Africa.

Africa is the world's second-largest and second-most-populous continent after Asia. Africa has enormous economic potential and some African economies are among the fastest growing in the world, including Ethiopia and Kenya. Nevertheless, Africa is the least developed continent and has been the least capable of poverty reduction.

To counter Chinese economic expansionism in the continent, Obama launched Trade Africa and announced that the US would invest $7 billion in infrastructure and target specific promising nations such as Kenya and Ethiopia. Obama was optimistic about the continent's economic future, noting that current growth rates are bashing "old stereotypes."

Even so, without a decisive mechanism for combatting corruption and advancing good governance, the African continent would continue to be mired in prolonged periods of uncertainty. It transpired during Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari's visit to Washington last month that a former Nigerian minister, so far unnamed, had pilfered $6 billion from Nigerian state coffers.

Awash with oil and natural gas, Nigeria, Africa's largest economy with a GDP of $521 billion, is a prime example of how corruption can cripple the continent's full economic potential. Buhari has embarked on a worthy anti-corruption campaign. The groundbreaking Nigerian news website Sahara Reporters alleged that Nigeria's President Buhari ordered the arrest of his own brother-in-law, Alhaji Musa Yola, on corruption charges, a claim that was later denied by the presidency.

The benefits of accountability and transparency in the political and economic spheres are there for the taking. Obama touched a raw nerve when he told the AU in Addis Ababa that the outdated practices of nepotism and presidency for life are detracting from the continent's social, political and economic potential. "Nobody should be president for life," Obama stressed.

Perhaps, he was alluding to Burundi's President Pierre Nkurunziza and his bid for a third term in office despite the fact that it contravenes the country's constitution. Such heinous political practices only bolster graft and gratuity. "I don't understand why people want to stay so long, especially when they have got a lot of money," Obama extrapolated.

Obama's host in Kenya, Kenyatta, was indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, based in The Hague, Netherlands. Kenyatta, a most congenial and convivial host, had a brush with Obama over a number of issues of cultural concerns that create political tensions between Africa and the US. Homosexuality springs to mind.

Why did Obama insist on speaking his mind concerning this most controversial and prickly topic in Africa? Surely, he understands how the vast majority of Africans disapprove of gay rights. Obama did not refrain from openly spotlighting the gay rights agenda. Does he not know that in Kenya, the birthplace of his father, gay sex is punishable by up to 14 years in prison?

Homosexuality was possibly the most anticipated clash of civilisations controversy to crop up during Obama's five-day tour. In the American context, perhaps it is true that liberal Americans are "painfully aware of the history when people are treated differently under the law," as Obama so aptly put it.

"When a government gets in the habit of treating people differently, those habits can spread,” Obama extrapolated. His host begged to differ. Gay rights “is not really an issue on the foremost mind of Kenyans. And that is a fact," said President Kenyatta.

Kenyan Deputy President William Ruto concurred, contending that homosexuality was "against the plan of God," whatever that may be.

The point is that the squabble of gay rights highlighted how many Africans are deeply offended by what they see as America's "civilising mission" and pompous preaching, meddling in cultural issues that from an African perspective should not be atop the agenda on such an august occasion. It should not have popped up in the first place.

The onus should have been on more consequential and meaningful matters, such as militant Islamist terrorism in East Africa and the 2013 attack on Nairobi’s Westgate Mall and the April attack this year in Garissa that killed nearly 150 people, both carried out by militant Islamist terrorists. Most Kenyan Muslims are law abiding citizens who abhor violence.

Kenya's foreign minister, Amina Mohamed, is herself a Muslim and a most outspoken critic of terrorism. Africans question America's motives. The challenge is least steep on the tricky question of terrorism. The US Africa Command (AFRICOM) is a key concern.

African troops are being increasingly deployed and US troops are no longer dispatched to war zones in Africa. The logic of this manoeuvre is simultaneously obvious and enduring.

Likewise, Obama is the first sitting US president to visit Ethiopia. Ethiopia's Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn officially welcomed Obama to the strategic Horn of Africa nation.

Ethiopia, Africa's second most populous nation, has one of the fastest growing economies on earth. Yet, Ethiopia's ruling party, the Ethiopian People's Revolutionary Democratic Front (EPRDF) won all 546, or 100 percent, of parliamentary seats in last month's polls.

African Union observers pronounced the elections free and fair, and the polls passed off without incident. The EPRDF has its roots in Marxism–Leninism. But neither Marxism-Leninism or the Maoism of Mao Zedong is regarded as a sacred cow anymore. The golden calf is capitalism.

Critics of the EPRDF claim that there was a break in the chain of control of ballot boxes and the opposition cried foul. Be that as it may, Ethiopia is vital to Washington's war on terror in East Africa. Fighting terrorism topped the agenda in Ethiopia.

The rainy season has begun in earnest in Ethiopia with ominous dark clouds unleashing torrents as Obama's plane skidded on the sodden tarmac of Bole International Airport in Addis Ababa. Was this an ill omen? No, and emphatically so, is the honest answer.

Ethiopia is unequivocally the most important member state of the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD) — the eight-nation regional trading bloc. IGAD, however, is as political as it is economic. And therefore, whatever their differences, Ethiopia will always be a key East African ally of the US, with or without a restrictive, authoritarian regime.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/136562.aspx
Researcher Explains Ebola Trial's Success
by Carol Pearson
VOA

The head of the scientific group that designed and oversaw the field test in Guinea says international collaboration and community involvement were key to the successful trial of a new Ebola vaccine.

In a break with traditional research methods, the team working on the Ebola vaccine did not use placebos on a control group. Instead they devised a "ring approach," administering vaccine to everyone in small groups considered most at risk of contracting the virus. Results were compared between those who received vaccinations immediately after an infection was detected and those who got the drug three weeks later.

Such "rings" of vaccination took place either immediately after an Ebola infection was confirmed or three weeks later, according to the researchers' random assignments. Of 2,014 people vaccinated immediately, no one had contracted Ebola when tested 10 days after receiving the new drug. In the clusters where people were vaccinated three weeks later — 2,380 people — 16 people contracted the virus.

​​In an interview with VOA, John-Arne Røttingen, director of the Division of Infectious Disease Control at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health, said his institute worked closely with Guinean representatives, international health organizations and researchers from other academic institutions to design and conduct the vaccine test, which involved thousands of people.

“We decided to have a very kind of local profile,” in order to persuade local residents to take part in the trial vaccinations, "Røttingen said in an interview from Norway.

“Almost 80, 90 percent of all those who have contributed in the trial on the ground in both follow-up teams and vaccination teams, they are from Guinea or from other West African countries,” he said.

“We wanted people with expertise in the local culture, and also knowledge of local languages, to be the ones who could go out to the different villages and the different communities and start a discussion on the potential involvement in a trial,” he explained.

In many cases, it was necessary to explain to the potential test subjects what a vaccination is and how it could help to protect them from Ebola.

“We started with local people who had knowledge of the society who went out to the communities and started a dialogue with the chief of the village or the chief of the community and potentially also religious leaders,” Røttingen said.

“When there was a trust established, an agreement, then at that stage we moved in with the vaccination teams.”

Røttingen said the group decided against providing a placebo, or non-effective vaccine, to a control group because they wanted to be sure to provide protection against Ebola for all those in the trial in the event the vaccine was effective.

“What we did was to follow the epidemic in a way, we identified contacts of new cases, and also contact of their contacts, and therefore we identified a ring of high-risk individuals. And those were the ones who were enrolled in the study.”

​​Røttingen pointed out that the vaccine, while apparently effective, is still not licensed for general use.

He said additional testing is needed, not only to verify the initial results but also as a way to continue offering protection against Ebola to those at risk from the disease.

The Norwegian scientist said the latest medical breakthrough could provide a “platform” for developing vaccines against other hemorrhagic viruses, but that the kind of international cooperation that produced the Ebola vaccine will be key to future successes.

“I think that is potentially the most important learning from the Ebola vaccination and vaccine development processes during this outbreak, that we have demonstrated that by good coordination and strong collaboration, the world is able to actually develop new technologies at high speed,” he said.

“So we should really utilize this experience to also go ahead with other emerging diseases and other important infections.”
Ebola Vaccine Works, Offering 100% Protection in African Trial
Martin is a contributing news editor and writer based in Amsterdam

By Martin Enserink
Science Magazine
31 July 2015 10:00 am

A highly unusual clinical trial in Guinea has shown for the first time that an Ebola vaccine protects people from the deadly virus. The study, published online today by The Lancet, shows that the injection offered contacts of Ebola cases 100% protection starting 10 days after they received a single shot of the vaccine, which is produced by Merck. Scientists say the vaccine could help to finally bring an end to the epidemic in West Africa, now more than 18 months old.

"This will go down in history as one of those hallmark public health efforts," says Michael Osterholm, the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy in Twin Cities, Minnesota, who wasn't involved in the study. "We will teach about this in public health schools."

"It's a wonderful result and a fantastic illustration of how vaccines can be developed very quickly and can be used in an outbreak situation to control the disease," says Adrian Hill, a vaccine researcher at the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom, also not involved in the work.

The vaccine, first developed by researchers at the Public Health Agency of Canada, consists of the Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV), which causes disease in livestock but not people, with the Ebola surface protein stitched into it. It is one of two vaccines currently being tested in the Ebola-stricken countries; the other one is produced by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK). The study of the Merck vaccine was led by Ana Maria Henao-Restrepo of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva, together with colleagues at the Norwegian Institute of Public Health in Oslo, the Guinean Ministry of Health, and others.

The decision to start the trial was taken in October, but it didn't get off the ground until March. By then, Ebola cases had already begun to plummet, and they were scattered across a large area in Guinea. To show efficacy in a standard randomized controlled trial, the researchers would have had to enroll far more people than was feasible.

Instead, they opted for a design called ring vaccination, in which only contacts of new Ebola patients, as well as the contacts' contacts, were vaccinated. The rings, or clusters, were randomized; in 48 of them, vaccination occurred as soon as possible after the detection of the Ebola case in their community. In the 42 other clusters, the vaccination teams came to give the shots three weeks later. The researchers then counted the number of new Ebola cases in each ring; because they weren't sure how long it takes for the vaccine's protection to kick in, they only included cases that occurred at least 10 days after vaccination in their primary analysis of the data. There were zero such cases among the  2014 people who were vaccinated right away, and 16 among the 2380 who got the shot 3 weeks later. That translates to 100% vaccine efficacy, at least in this study, the researchers write.

The idea of a ring vaccination design, never before used in a formal vaccine study, "was absolutely very creative," says Osterholm, and it allowed the team to follow the epidemic wherever it went. "Had this been a standard, straightforward randomized controlled trial, we would never had this answer.”

"It surprised me how quickly you can intervene with a vaccination and have an effect," says Jeremy Farrar, the head of the Wellcome Trust research charity, which co-funded the study. "It’s possible to do that sort of complex work in very, very complex environments—ethically, socially, culturally and scientifically. You can do it. That is a revelation for many people." The outcome was so convincing that the trial's data and safety monitoring board-an independent group watching over the safety of participants—recommended to end it in its current form, and start vaccinating all clusters immediately from now on, which the team has now started doing. The vaccine should also be rolled out in Sierra Leone, says Osterholm, which also still has cases. It may well help to finally bring the number of cases to zero, he says.

WHO director-general Margaret Chan called the study "exciting" at a press conference this morning but cautioned that follow-up studies are needed. "If proven effective this is going to be a game-changer. It will change the management of the current Ebola outbreak and future outbreaks," Chan said.

There were only seven new cases of Ebola last week, WHO reported its most recent situation report on the epidemic: four in Guinea and three in Sierra Leone. That's the lowest in well over a year, but WHO has warned that the disease can easily flare up again. There were only 12 cases one week in May, for instance, but the virus bounced back to more than 30 cases per week in July.

With reporting by Kai Kupferschmidt
Egypt's Sisi Expresses Support for Bahrain's Efforts in Alliance With US Imperialism
Ahram Online
Friday 31 Jul 2015

El-Sisi made a phone call to King Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa

Three days after a bombing in Bahrain killed two policemen, Egypt’s President Abdel-Fattah El-Sisi has said that Cairo supports the Gulf state's “anti-terrorism efforts”, state news agency MENA reported.

A presidential statement said that El-Sisi made a phone call on Thursday to King of Bahrain Hamad bin Isa Al-Khalifa where he asserted that Arab national security, including that of Bahrain, is a “red line”.

He added that Cairo is committed to Bahrain’s “security and stability” and rejects intervention in its local affairs.

King Hamad commended relations between Cairo and Manama, according to the statement, stressing the importance of enhancing the relationship on all fronts.

Egypt’s foreign ministry had previously condemned the bomb attack on Tuesday that killed two Bahraini policemen in the mainly Shia village of Sitra, south of Manama.

The bomb attack occurred days after the Bahraini government said it had foiled a plot that involved arms smuggling by two Bahraini citizens with ties to Iran, according to Reuters.

“Egypt stands by and fully supports the leadership, government, and people of Bahrain in combating terrorism,” the spokesperson of the Egyptian foreign ministry said on Tuesday.

Bahrain has been confronting an opposition movement among Bahraini Shias over the past four years.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/136615.aspx
New F-16s to Fly Over Cairo to Celebrate Arrival From United States
Ahram Online
Friday 31 Jul 2015

Eight new F-16 fighter jets have arrived from the US

Eight F-16 fighter jets will take to Cairo’s skies on Friday in a display celebrating their arrival from the United States.

The flyover is scheduled from 16.00 to 16.30 CLT (GMT+2), according to Al-Ahram Arabic news website.

The US embassy in Cairo issued a statement on Thursday saying that the delivery of the aircraft on Thursday and Friday comes as part of the US’s ongoing support to the country, which includes $1.3 billion in aid this year.

The aircraft “provide a valuable capability that is needed during these times of regional instability” said Major General Charles Hooper, a senior defence official at the US embassy who was quoted in the statement.

“Extremists threaten regional security and these weapon systems provide a new tool to help Egypt fight terrorism,” he added.

The eight jets, which were flown to Egypt from Texas, will be integrated into Egypt’s air force once they arrive.

Four more are scheduled to be delivered this autumn, according to the statement.

Earlier in July,Egypt received three Rafale jet fighters from France in a ceremony at a French military base, the first batch of 24 warplanes acquired by Cairo in a 5.2 billion euro ($5.6 billion) deal in February.

They also flew over Cairo in a show to celebrate their delivery.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/136632.aspx
Kerry Off to Mideast With Egypt, Iran Deal, Syria on Agenda
Ahram Online
Friday 31 Jul 2015

Secretary of State John Kerry is returning to the Middle East on Friday for security talks in Egypt and discussions in Qatar with Arab foreign ministers whose countries are wary of the nuclear deal struck with Iran. He will not visit Israel, America's foremost Mideast ally and the primary foreign opponent of the Iran agreement.

U.S. officials rejected suggestions that Kerry's omission of Israel from the itinerary signaled that the Obama administration had given up trying to convince Israeli leaders of the merits of the Iran deal. They noted that Defense Secretary Ash Carter had visited the Jewish state in mid-July and that contacts with Israeli officials continue to be robust.

The last time Kerry spoke with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was on July 16, two days after the Iran deal was concluded.

Officials said the Iran-related portion of the trip was primarily designed to follow-up on a May meeting that President Barack Obama hosted for Arab leaders at Camp David at which the U.S. promised them enhanced security cooperation and expedited defense sales to guard against a potential Iranian threat. The officials, who spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss Kerry's trip publicly, said the talks in Qatar would take stock of progress made on those goals, particularly since the Iran deal was signed.

One U.S. official said that Kerry would use the meeting with the foreign ministers of the Gulf Cooperation Council to "try to respond to any remaining questions they might have, hopefully satisfy them and ensure that they are supporting our effort going forward."

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif visited Kuwait, Qatar and Iraq in a similar tour earlier this week to talk to his counterparts about the Iran deal.

Saudi Arabia is the largest and most influential member of the council and has been publicly supportive of the Iran deal, albeit with reservations. Just this week, the State Department authorized the sale to Saudi Arabia of $5.4 billion in Patriot missiles and related equipment along with $500 million in ammunition.

In addition to Iran, Kerry and the Arab ministers are expected to look closely at the situation in Syria and Iraq, which continue to be ravaged by conflict and the spread of the Islamic State extremist group, the officials said. Kerry has said he plans to meet separately in Doha with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov to discuss Syria, Iran and the ongoing crisis in Ukraine.

Kerry's first stop will be in Cairo where he will participate on Sunday in a strategic dialogue with Egyptian officials that has been on hiatus because of political unrest since 2009. Despite its continuing human rights concerns, the Obama administration is increasing military assistance to Egypt as it confronts growing threats from extremists, particularly on the Sinai peninsula.

Sinai-based militants have launched increasingly sophisticated attacks in recent months that have killed dozens of Egyptian soldiers and police. The latest wave of violence began after the ouster of Islamist President Mohamed Morsi two years ago.

U.S. military assistance to Egypt had been on hold until earlier this year due to human rights and democracy concerns in the wake of Morsi's ouster but was resumed after the administration decided to waive those provisions for national security reasons.

The U.S. announced this week it would be delivering eight F-16 warplanes to Egypt on Friday as part of an ongoing military support package to help the Egyptians combat terrorism. Four more F-16s are to be delivered this fall.

Some lawmakers and numerous advocacy groups are urging Kerry to raise human rights issues with Egyptian authorities, including the arrests of dissidents and journalists, mass trials and sentencings of Morsi supporters. The U.S. officials said those concerns would be raised at all of Kerry's meetings in Cairo and noted that the State Department's top diplomat for human rights and democracy would be accompanying him.

Broadening U.S.-Egyptian trade and economic ties will also be on the table during Kerry's Egypt visit, which comes just days before the country inaugurates a second, parallel waterway to allow two-way traffic on the Suez Canal. Egyptian officials are hoping the opening will boost its flagging economy.

According to a short statement issued by the Egyptian Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Friday, Sameh Shoukri and Kerry discussed on the phone preparations for the strategic dialogue sessions and the bilateral relations between the two countries.

They held talks over the latest developments in the Middle East region as well as the war on terrorism.

In a previous media statement issued by foreign ministry spokesperson Badr Abdel-Atti, the upcoming dialogue is aimed at boosting the bilateral strategic partnership between Egypt and the US.

Relations between Cairo and Washington have become strained since the ouster of Morsi in 2013.

After leaving the Middle East, Kerry will travel to Southeast Asia, stopping in Singapore, Malaysia and Vietnam before returning to Washington.

http://english.ahram.org.eg/News/136651.aspx
EU Announces Release of Aid for Burundi Refugees
English.news.cn  
2015-07-31 17:37:06

KIGALI, July 30 (Xinhua) -- The European Commission announced on Thursday that it is releasing 4.5 million euros (4.93 million U.S. dollars) in humanitarian assistance to help the increasing number of refugees from Burundi who have fled to neighboring countries.

More than 175,000 people, the majority of whom are women and children, are estimated to have left the country.

"We cannot overlook the deteriorating humanitarian situation affecting Burundi. Refugee numbers are up in the last three months which is a serious cause of concern in an already fragile region. This additional EU humanitarian funding will help neighboring countries accommodate refugees and meet their most urgent needs. It is a strong signal of the EU's solidarity with the most vulnerable people caught in a difficult situation beyond their control," said Christos Stylianides,the EU Commissioner for Humanitarian Aid and Crisis Management, in a statement Thursday.

The most urgent humanitarian needs to address are shelter, water and sanitation, as well as health assistance to stop the possible surge of diseases and epidemics, such as cholera. A key concern ahead of the rainy season is overpopulation of certain refugee camps, according to officials.

This funding increase brings the total humanitarian aid to the Great Lakes region for 2015 to 56.5 million euros (61.9 million U.S. dollars).

Michael Ryan, Head of the EU Delegation in Rwanda, said the funds would go solely to assist in the Burundi refugee crisis.

"It is well needed...the EU is committed to continue its support of Rwanda and the neighboring countries in this crisis," said Ryan.

Rwanda, Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Uganda have been experiencing influx of refugees from Burundi since April. Those arriving cite intimidation, threats and fear of violence as reasons for fleeing the country.

Rwanda hosts slightly more than 70,000 Burundians, with reports indicating that some have started to repatriate following a lull in violence after a controversial election won by President Pierre Nkurunziza.

Tanzania is so far the main hosting country with nearly 80,000 Burundi refugees, followed by Rwanda with 71,158, the Democratic Republic of Congo with 13,368, and Uganda with 11,165.
Burundi's Opposition Leader Rwasa Becomes Deputy Speaker
30 July 2015
BBC World Servce

Burundi opposition leader Agathon Rwasa speaks during an interview in the capital Bujumbura on 22 July 2015

Despite boycotting the presidential poll Mr Rwasa still won nearly 20% of the vote.

Burundi's opposition leader Agathon Rwasa has been elected as a deputy speaker of parliament, despite strident criticism of recent legislative and presidential polls.

There has been a political crisis since President Pierre Nkurunziza announced he would run for a third term.

Mr Rwasa withdrew from this month's presidential election and described Mr Nkurunziza's victory as "a joke".

He now says he will "play the game" to bring peace, AFP news agency reports.

Mr Rwasa supported the protests, that began in April, against Mr Nkurunziza's third-term bid in which more than 70 people have died in clashes with the police.

There was also a failed coup attempt in May.

Weeks of protest and a failed coup attempt followed Mr Nkurunziza's third-term bid
Mr Rwasa's opposition coalition also called for a boycott of June's parliamentary elections, but with its name on the ballot paper it still won 21 seats.

There is a faltering negotiation process, chaired by Uganda, that is aimed at solving the crisis.

Mr Rwasa took up his seat in parliament to some surprise on Monday saying that as the talks were still going on it was worth participating in the political process.

Fellow opposition leader Charles Nditije said Mr Rwasa's move betrayed those who died during the protests.

He was elected as one of parliament's deputy speakers with the backing of MPs from Mr Nkuruniziza's CNDD-FDD party.

The BBC's Prime Ndikumagenge in Burundi's capital, Bujumbura, says that it is difficult to see what Mr Rwasa's strategy is.

But the opposition leader may now have more influence on the politics of the country in his new post, he says.
Burundian Foreign Minister: Government Ready for Talks
by Mohammed Yusuf
VOA

Burundi’s foreign affairs minister says the government is ready to talk to opposition parties and other opponents of President Pierre Nkurunziza's re-election bid, which resulted in a landslide victory last week.

Opposition parties boycotted last week's presidential election in Burundi, and United Nations electoral observers said the overall environment in Burundi was not conducive to free and fair elections.

The government is insisting it won the election fairly. In an interview with VOA, Burundian Foreign Affairs Minister Alain Nyamitwe says the high turnout, reported at 74 percent, was a sign people have faith in the country’s political leaders and systems.

“Frankly speaking, I continue to believe firmly that the atmosphere was okay, that people were able to go and vote is a testimony to the fact that people believed in their leaders, people believed in the peace that they have enjoyed over the last couple of years,” he said.
​​
​​President Nkurunziza is set to begin a third term after coasting to victory with 69 percent of the vote.

His nearest competitor, opposition leader Agathon Rwasa, won 19 percent.

Political challenges

However, the president is facing challenges. On Thursday, Rwasa became deputy speaker in parliament.

And according to Reuters news agency, a group of exiled opposition figures, including three former presidents and the leaders of a failed coup, met in Ethiopia's capital Thursday to discuss setting up an alternative Burundi government.

​​Nyamitwe says the government is ready for talks with political opponents — but the will of the people must be considered too.

"Let us dialogue, let us discuss, let us talk on all those issues they think are contentious," he said.

"But I believe that at the end of the day the people of Burundi should be given an opportunity also to say what they think.”

Opposition concerns

Human rights groups have accused Burundian security forces and the Imbonerakure militia group of attacking and intimidating protesters and voters during the heated election period.

Some opposition members have expressed concern that the president, having broken the two-term limit in the constitution, may try to do away with term limits altogether.

Nyamitwe tells VOA that he does not support any constitutional changes, and that it is up to Burundians to decide the future of their country.

“I do not applaud changing the rules of the game ... it's up to the people to decide, and when I say 'the people,' I am not saying a few people in the capital," he said. "I am talking about people generally in the country.”

During his Nairobi visit on Saturday, U.S. President Barack Obama denounced the recent Burundi election as "not credible" and said the U.S. wants to see a dialogue between the government and opposition.

http://www.voanews.com/content/burundi-government-ready-to-talk-to-opponents/2888315.html
Burundi's President Urges National Unity After Winning Contentious Elections
Associated Press July 31, 2015
11:59 a.m. EDT

BUJUMBURA, Burundi (AP) — Burundi's re-elected president is urging unity after winning contentious polls that the international community says were not credible.

In a televised speech Thursday night, Pierre Nkurunziza said he would be a president for all, including those who did not vote for him.

He said that during his presidency "everyone will enjoy the same rights and opportunities without favoritism."

Nkurunziza won 69 percent of the vote while his closest rival, Agathon Rwasa, got 19 percent in the July 21 elections.

The elections took place amid violence stemming from regular street protests against Nkurunziza's bid for a third term in office, which many saw as unconstitutional.

The U.N. had urged Burundi's government to delay the elections until the situation was sufficiently calm to hold credible, free and fair elections.